From: LAZZARINI Peter [Peter.Lazzarini@dnrme.qld.gov.au]Sent: Wednesday, 8 March 2017 11:18 AMTo: matthew.pitman@ministerial.qld.gov.auCC: FEELY Alan; DOWNES MandySubject: Self-assessable veg codes

Hi Matt,Al just informed me that you want the self-assessable veg clearing codes to send to the Prem’s office. I just want to clarifywhich codes you wanted.

• Thinning and fodder harvesting codes which have been endorsed by the herbarium and are ready for approval?• The encroachment code that has been endorsed by the herbarium and is ready for public consultation?• Remaining 8 codes which have been drafted but are still waiting for endorsement from the herbarium before public

consultation? RegardsPeter Lazz

Peter LazzariniDirectorVegetation | Operations SupportDepartment of Natural Resources and Mines

P: 3199 7364 M: E: peter.lazzarini@dnrm.qld.gov.auA: Level 3, 1 William Street, Brisbane QLD 4000 | POBox 15216, City East, QLD 4002W: www.dnrm.qld.gov.au

17-361 File C Page 1 of 16

s.73 - Irrelevant information

Publis

hed o

n DNRME D

isclos

ure Lo

g

RTI Act

2009

From: LAZZARINI Peter [Peter.Lazzarini@dnrme.qld.gov.au]Sent: Wednesday, 8 March 2017 12:15 PMTo: Matthew PitmanCC: FEELY Alan; DOWNES MandySubject: RE: Self-assessable veg codesAttachments: 170207_DRAFT_Fodder harvesting_DG_clean.pdf;170207_DRAFT_Managing_thickened_vegetation_DG_clean.pdf; 170207_DRAFT_Encroachment_DG_clean.pdf

Hi again Matt,Fodder and Thinning codes attached. We have not set a date for public consultation as we have been waiting for approval to release from Min. Last year, the thinningand fodder codes were sent to the DP’s office for endorsement prior to release for public consultation. I have also attached theencroachment code in case you want to send it as well. RegardsPeter

From: Matthew Pitman [mailto:Matthew.Pitman@ministerial.qld.gov.au] Sent: Wednesday, 8 March 2017 11:21 AMTo: LAZZARINI Peter <Peter.Lazzarini@dnrm.qld.gov.au>Cc: FEELY Alan <Alan.Feely@dnrm.qld.gov.au>; DOWNES Mandy <Mandy.Downes@dnrm.qld.gov.au>Subject: RE: Self-assessable veg codes Thinning and fodder are fine for now thanks. When does the encroachment consultation begin? Matthew

Matthew PitmanPolicy AdvisorOffice of the Hon. Dr Anthony Lynham MPMinister for State Development and Natural Resources and Mines ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

P 07 3719 7368 M 1 William Street Brisbane QLD 4000

From: LAZZARINI Peter [mailto:Peter.Lazzarini@dnrm.qld.gov.au] Sent: Wednesday, 8 March 2017 11:19 AMTo: Matthew Pitman <Matthew.Pitman@ministerial.qld.gov.au>Cc: FEELY Alan <Alan.Feely@dnrm.qld.gov.au>; DOWNES Mandy <Mandy.Downes@dnrm.qld.gov.au>Subject: Self-assessable veg codes Hi Matt,Al just informed me that you want the self-assessable veg clearing codes to send to the Prem’s office. I just want to clarifywhich codes you wanted.

• Thinning and fodder harvesting codes which have been endorsed by the herbarium and are ready for approval?• The encroachment code that has been endorsed by the herbarium and is ready for public consultation?

17-361 File C Page 2 of 16

s.73 - Irrelevant information

Publis

hed o

n DNRME D

isclos

ure Lo

g

RTI Act

2009

• Remaining 8 codes which have been drafted but are still waiting for endorsement from the herbarium before publicconsultation?

RegardsPeter Lazz

Peter LazzariniDirectorVegetation | Operations SupportDepartment of Natural Resources and Mines

P: 3199 7364 M:E: peter.lazzarini@dnrm.qld.gov.auA: Level 3, 1 William Street, Brisbane QLD 4000 | POBox 15216, City East, QLD 4002W: www.dnrm.qld.gov.au

------------------------------

The information in this email together with any attachments is intended only for the person or entity to which it isaddressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. There is no waiver of any confidentiality/privilege by yourinadvertent receipt of this material.

Any form of review, disclosure, modification, distribution and/or publication of this email message is prohibited, unless asa necessary part of Departmental business.

If you have received this message in error, you are asked to inform the sender as quickly as possible and delete this messageand any copies of this message from your computer and/or your computer system network.

------------------------------

This email, together with any attachments, is intended for the named recipient(s) only; and may contain privileged andconfidential information. If received in error, you are asked to inform the sender as quickly as possible and delete thisemail and any copies of this from your computer system network.

If not an intended recipient of this email, you must not copy, distribute or take any action(s) that relies on it; any formof disclosure, modification, distribution and /or publication of this email is also prohibited.

Unless stated otherwise, this email represents only the views of the sender and not the views of the QueenslandGovernment.

Please consider the environment before printing this email.

17-361 File C Page 3 of 16

s.73 - Irrelevant information

Publis

hed o

n DNRME D

isclos

ure Lo

g

RTI Act

2009

From: LAZZARINI Peter [Peter.Lazzarini@dnrme.qld.gov.au]Sent: Friday, 1 September 2017 9:35 AMTo: Matthew Pitman; MACDONALD PeterSubject: RE: Veg

Hi Matthew,About 65% of the 2015-16 SLATS clearing rate was category X. The figure you need to look at in the report is the clearing rateof non-remnant vegetation (257,000 ha/yr). This will be close to the category X rate. The remnant clearing rate (138,000 ha/yr)equates to Category B on our veg maps.We haven’t received the veg map category breakdown of the figures from DISTI yet but they will be pretty close to the figuresabove.RegardsPeter Lazz

From: Matthew Pitman [mailto:Matthew.Pitman@ministerial.qld.gov.au] Sent: Friday, 1 September 2017 9:15 AMTo: LAZZARINI Peter <Peter.Lazzarini@dnrm.qld.gov.au>; MACDONALD Peter <Peter.Macdonald@dnrm.qld.gov.au>Subject: Veg Peters, Was just after a quick break down of veg clearing by category. As in Cat x is X% of total clearing etc. I’m looking through the last slats report and can’t seem to find them in there but I freely admit it was a pretty half baked look.

Matthew PitmanPolicy AdvisorOffice of the Hon. Dr Anthony Lynham MPMinister for State Development and Natural Resources and Mines ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

P 07 3719 7368 M 1 William Street Brisbane QLD 4000

This email, together with any attachments, is intended for the named recipient(s) only; and may contain privileged andconfidential information. If received in error, you are asked to inform the sender as quickly as possible and delete thisemail and any copies of this from your computer system network.

If not an intended recipient of this email, you must not copy, distribute or take any action(s) that relies on it; any formof disclosure, modification, distribution and /or publication of this email is also prohibited.

Unless stated otherwise, this email represents only the views of the sender and not the views of the QueenslandGovernment.

Please consider the environment before printing this email.

17-361 File C Page 4 of 16

s.73 - Irrelevant information

Publis

hed o

n DNRME D

isclos

ure Lo

g

RTI Act

2009

From: LAZZARINI Peter [Peter.Lazzarini@dnrme.qld.gov.au]Sent: Monday, 4 September 2017 4:56 PMTo: Matthew PitmanCC: MACDONALD PeterSubject: RE: SLATS

Hi Matt,DSITI has done some further analysis for us. Do you know what EHP are after so we can see if we have the info? I just had a call from someone in EHP chasing the breakdown of SLATS clearing rates in category X on PMAVs and category X onthe Regulated Veg Map. The difference is that the category X on PMAVs has been ‘locked in’ by landholders. If you can let me know I will follow up.RegardsPeter Lazz

From: Matthew Pitman [mailto:Matthew.Pitman@ministerial.qld.gov.au] Sent: Monday, 4 September 2017 3:24 PMTo: LAZZARINI Peter <Peter.Lazzarini@dnrm.qld.gov.au>; MACDONALD Peter <Peter.Macdonald@dnrm.qld.gov.au>Subject: SLATS Hi Guys, EHP Min office have just asked me about some of the analysis of the SLATS data we’ve done in previous years. Not asking for a supplementary report, just some of the stuff around carbon released from clearing etc. Do you know if any of that work has been done this year?

Matthew PitmanPolicy AdvisorOffice of the Hon. Dr Anthony Lynham MPMinister for State Development and Natural Resources and Mines ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

P 07 3719 7368 M 1 William Street Brisbane QLD 4000

This email, together with any attachments, is intended for the named recipient(s) only; and may contain privileged andconfidential information. If received in error, you are asked to inform the sender as quickly as possible and delete thisemail and any copies of this from your computer system network.

If not an intended recipient of this email, you must not copy, distribute or take any action(s) that relies on it; any formof disclosure, modification, distribution and /or publication of this email is also prohibited.

Unless stated otherwise, this email represents only the views of the sender and not the views of the QueenslandGovernment.

Please consider the environment before printing this email.

17-361 File C Page 5 of 16

s.73 - Irrelevant information

Publis

hed o

n DNRME D

isclos

ure Lo

g

RTI Act

2009

From: LAZZARINI Peter [Peter.Lazzarini@dnrme.qld.gov.au]Sent: Thursday, 14 December 2017 10:38 AMTo: Matthew PitmanCC: FEELY AlanSubject: Re: SACs

Hi MattWe have updated Thinning code and has been checked by the Herb. Fodder will be ready soon.Any word on possible release?Peter

Sent from my iPhone

On 14 Dec 2017, at 10:26 am, Matthew Pitman <Matthew.Pitman@ministerial.qld.gov.au> wrote:

Hey Guys, How are we going on the updated SACs, haven’t heard anything for a few days. Matthew <image002.png>Matthew PitmanPolicy AdvisorOffice of the Hon. Dr Anthony Lynham MPMinister for State Development and Natural Resources and Mines ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

P 07 3719 7368 M1 William Street Brisbane QLD 4000

This email, together with any attachments, is intended for the named recipient(s) only; and may containprivileged and confidential information. If received in error, you are asked to inform the sender as quicklyas possible and delete this email and any copies of this from your computer system network.

If not an intended recipient of this email, you must not copy, distribute or take any action(s) that relies onit; any form of disclosure, modification, distribution and /or publication of this email is also prohibited.

Unless stated otherwise, this email represents only the views of the sender and not the views of theQueensland Government.

Please consider the environment before printing this email.

17-361 File C Page 6 of 16

s.73 - Irrelevant information

Publis

hed o

n DNRME D

isclos

ure Lo

g

RTI Act

2009

From: LAZZARINI Peter [Peter.Lazzarini@dnrme.qld.gov.au]Sent: Thursday, 14 December 2017 11:17 AMTo: 'Matthew Pitman'CC: FEELY AlanSubject: RE: SACs

We will have the Fodder code done early this afternoon then we need to get the Herbarium's final endorsement. Hopefully they will get back to uslater this afternoon. If not, it will be early tomorrow morning.

-----Original Message-----From: Matthew Pitman [mailto:Matthew.Pitman@ministerial.qld.gov.au]Sent: Thursday, 14 December 2017 10:55 AMTo: LAZZARINI Peter <Peter.Lazzarini@dnrm.qld.gov.au>Cc: FEELY Alan <Alan.Feely@dnrm.qld.gov.au>Subject: RE: SACs

Nothing close to definitive sorry.

When do you think you will be in a position to brief on the first two?

Matthew PitmanPolicy AdvisorOffice of the Hon. Dr Anthony Lynham MP Minister for State Development and Natural Resources and Mines---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------P 07 3719 7368 M1 William Street Brisbane QLD 4000

-----Original Message-----From: LAZZARINI Peter [mailto:Peter.Lazzarini@dnrm.qld.gov.au]Sent: Thursday, 14 December 2017 10:38 AMTo: Matthew Pitman <Matthew.Pitman@ministerial.qld.gov.au>Cc: FEELY Alan <Alan.Feely@dnrm.qld.gov.au>Subject: Re: SACs

Hi MattWe have updated Thinning code and has been checked by the Herb. Fodder will be ready soon.Any word on possible release?Peter

Sent from my iPhone

On 14 Dec 2017, at 10:26 am, Matthew Pitman <Matthew.Pitman@ministerial.qld.gov.au<mailto:Matthew.Pitman@ministerial.qld.gov.au>>wrote:

Hey Guys,

How are we going on the updated SACs, haven't heard anything for a few days.

Matthew

<image002.png>Matthew PitmanPolicy AdvisorOffice of the Hon. Dr Anthony Lynham MPMinister for State Development and Natural Resources and Mines---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------P 07 3719 7368 M1 William Street Brisbane QLD 4000

17-361 File C Page 7 of 16

s.73 - Irrelevant information

s.73 - Irrelevant information

Publis

hed o

n DNRME D

isclos

ure Lo

g

RTI Act

2009

This email, together with any attachments, is intended for the named recipient(s) only; and may contain privileged and confidential information. Ifreceived in error, you are asked to inform the sender as quickly as possible and delete this email and any copies of this from your computer systemnetwork.

If not an intended recipient of this email, you must not copy, distribute or take any action(s) that relies on it; any form of disclosure, modification,distribution and /or publication of this email is also prohibited.

Unless stated otherwise, this email represents only the views of the sender and not the views of the Queensland Government.

Please consider the environment before printing this email.

------------------------------The information in this email together with any attachments is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may containconfidential and/or privileged material. There is no waiver of any confidentiality/privilege by your inadvertent receipt of this material.Any form of review, disclosure, modification, distribution and/or publication of this email message is prohibited, unless as a necessary part ofDepartmental business.If you have received this message in error, you are asked to inform the sender as quickly as possible and delete this message and any copies of thismessage from your computer and/or your computer system network.------------------------------This email, together with any attachments, is intended for the named recipient(s) only; and may contain privileged and confidential information. Ifreceived in error, you are asked to inform the sender as quickly as possible and delete this email and any copies of this from your computer systemnetwork.

If not an intended recipient of this email, you must not copy, distribute or take any action(s) that relies on it; any form of disclosure, modification,distribution and /or publication of this email is also prohibited.

Unless stated otherwise, this email represents only the views of the sender and not the views of the Queensland Government.

Please consider the environment before printing this email.

17-361 File C Page 8 of 16

Publis

hed o

n DNRME D

isclos

ure Lo

g

RTI Act

2009

From: LAZZARINI Peter [Peter.Lazzarini@dnrme.qld.gov.au]Sent: Monday, 18 December 2017 2:22 PMTo: DOWNES Mandy; MACDONALD Peter; PEART PrueSubject: FW: 171218_Vegetation Management options risks_tableAttachments: 171218_Vegetation Management options risks_table.docx

FYI

From: FEELY Alan Sent: Monday, 18 December 2017 2:18 PMTo: PURTILL James <James.Purtill@dnrme.qld.gov.au>; Adrian Jeffreys <adrian.jeffreys@premiers.qld.gov.au>; Matthew Pitman<Matthew.Pitman@ministerial.qld.gov.au>Cc: LAZZARINI Peter <Peter.Lazzarini@dnrme.qld.gov.au>; gordon.guymers@dsiti.qld.gov.auSubject: 171218_Vegetation Management options risks_table Hi see attached Table around veg regulation timing options. I think it is pretty clear the second week in January gives us better system security, more area under protection, avoids the“look “ of a Xmas eve issue, and has relatively low risk of substantive additional clearing occurring. I have highlighted the key bits, ta Al

17-361 File C Page 9 of 16

Publis

hed o

n DNRME D

isclos

ure Lo

g

RTI Act

2009

Vegetation Management Options

Timelines, risks and regulation of what can be delivered by when

Summary: Announcement on week of 18 December 2017 will increase the potential criticism of government due to possible system failure and no staff to answer calls due to Christmas closure. Risk of clearing of vegetation proposed for regulation will be minimised. Level of protection over regrowth reduced (through lack of essential habitat)

Announcement on second week of January 2018 will limit criticism of government due to system failure and answering calls but slightly increase the risk of vegetation proposed for regulation being cleared. Higher level of protection will be possible over regrowth areas (by adding essential habitat)

Date Version 10 mapping Risks of clearing

Business risks Proposed regulated map Availability High nature cons value regrowth

Remnant Essential habitat (over remnant)

Wetlands Watercourses High value regrowth (post 1999 regrowth)

Essential habitat (over regrowth)

Wetlands Reef watercourses (Consistent with HNC Network)

Week of 18 Dec 2017

Yes Will add 60,000 ha

Yes Will add 1.7 M ha to protection (existing 2.8 M ha)

Yes Will add 470,000ha to protection (existing 3.6 M ha)

No Existing watercourse mapping only

Reduced risk of clearing in areas of additional /proposed additional regulation

Online map deliver system will crash due to increased downloads (As occurred in past). No staff to take calls from clients. Mapping not tested. Increased risk of legal challenge due to retrospectivity.

Yes Will show 665,000 ha proposed for regulation

No No Yes Will show 360,000 ha proposed for regulation (over existing watercourses)

Globe Online maps (maps only, not property report) QSpatial (entire data layer)

No Will take about 12 months to redefine and map additional regrowth

Week of 8 January 2018

Yes As above

Yes As above

Yes As above

No As above

Low given landholders have had 15 months to clear or PMAV veg proposed for regulation. Based on SLATS rates est 8,000 ha of clearing max (in remnant) Less clearing occurs in wet season.

Limited additional risks as staff available to deal with. Increased risk of legal challenge due to retrospectivity.

Yes As above

Yes Will add (unknown) additional area for protection

Yes Will add (unknown) additional area for protection

Yes Will show 360,000 ha proposed for regulation (over existing watercourses)

Globe Online maps (maps and property report) QSpatial (entire data layer)

No As above

With a Veg Bill

Yes As above

Yes As above

Yes As above

Yes Will have updated more accurate watercourse mapping

Minimised by prior announcement

Limited additional risks as staff available to deal with.

Yes As above

Yes As above

Yes As above

Yes Will have updated more accurate watercourse mapping

Yes As above

No As above

Longer term

Yearly update

Yearly update

Yearly update

Yearly update Risk of increased clearing in these areas

Limited additional risks as staff available to deal with.

Yearly update

Yearly update Yearly update

Yearly update Yes As above

Yes Additional areas of regrowth identified and mapped

17-361 File C Page 10 of 16Release

Publis

hed o

n DNRME D

isclos

ure Lo

g

RTI Act

2009

From: LAZZARINI Peter [Peter.Lazzarini@dnrme.qld.gov.au]Sent: Monday, 18 December 2017 3:50 PMTo: FEELY Alan; PURTILL James; Adrian Jeffreys; Matthew PitmanCC: GUYMER Gordon; JONES Steve (DSITI); MACDONALD PeterSubject: RE: 171218_Vegetation Management options risks_tableAttachments: 171218_Vegetation Management options & risks_table_V2.docx

Hi All,I have just heard back from our mapping people and it is unlikely that they can provide updated essential habitat mapping andwetland mapping over proposed high value regrowth areas in the second week of January 2018. They would be able to deliverit in late January. I have updated the Table to reflect this info and highlighted the changes in red.RegardsPeter Lazz

From: FEELY Alan Sent: Monday, 18 December 2017 2:18 PMTo: PURTILL James <James.Purtill@dnrme.qld.gov.au>; Adrian Jeffreys <adrian.jeffreys@premiers.qld.gov.au>; Matthew Pitman<Matthew.Pitman@ministerial.qld.gov.au>Cc: LAZZARINI Peter <Peter.Lazzarini@dnrme.qld.gov.au>; gordon.guymers@dsiti.qld.gov.auSubject: 171218_Vegetation Management options risks_table Hi see attached Table around veg regulation timing options. I think it is pretty clear the second week in January gives us better system security, more area under protection, avoids the“look “ of a Xmas eve issue, and has relatively low risk of substantive additional clearing occurring. I have highlighted the key bits, ta Al

17-361 File C Page 11 of 16

Publis

hed o

n DNRME D

isclos

ure Lo

g

RTI Act

2009

Vegetation Management Options

Timelines, risks and regulation of what can be delivered by when

Summary: Announcement on week of 18 December 2017 will increase the potential criticism of government due to possible system failure and no staff to answer calls due to Christmas closure. Risk of clearing of vegetation proposed for regulation will be minimised. Level of protection over regrowth reduced (through lack of essential habitat)

Announcement on second week of January 2018 will limit criticism of government due to system failure and answering calls but slightly increase the risk of vegetation proposed for regulation being cleared. Higher level of protection will be possible over regrowth areas (by adding essential habitat)

Date Version 10 mapping Risks of clearing

Business risks Proposed regulated map Availability High nature cons value regrowth

Remnant Essential habitat (over remnant)

Wetlands Watercourses High value regrowth (post 1999 regrowth)

Essential habitat (over regrowth)

Wetlands Reef watercourses (Consistent with HNC Network)

Week of 18 Dec 2017

Yes Will add 60,000 ha

Yes Will add 1.7 M ha to protection (existing 2.8 M ha)

Yes Will add 470,000ha to protection (existing 3.6 M ha)

No Existing watercourse mapping only

Reduced risk of clearing in areas of additional /proposed additional regulation

Online map deliver system will crash due to increased downloads (As occurred in past). No staff to take calls from clients. Mapping not tested. Increased risk of legal challenge due to retrospectivity.

Yes Will show 665,000 ha proposed for regulation

No No Yes Will show 360,000 ha proposed for regulation (over existing watercourses)

Globe Online maps (maps only, not property report) QSpatial (entire data layer)

No Will take about 12 months to redefine and map additional regrowth

Week of 8 January 2018

Yes As above

Yes As above

Yes As above

No As above

Low given landholders have had 15 months to clear or PMAV veg proposed for regulation. Based on SLATS rates est 8,000 ha of clearing max (in remnant) Less clearing occurs in wet season.

Limited additional risks as staff available to deal with. Increased risk of legal challenge due to retrospectivity.

Yes As above

Yes No Will add (unknown) additional area for protection Would be available late January

Yes No Will add (unknown) additional area for protection Would be available late January

Yes Will show 360,000 ha proposed for regulation (over existing watercourses)

Globe Online maps (maps and property report) QSpatial (entire data layer)

No As above

With a Veg Bill

Yes As above

Yes As above

Yes As above

Yes Will have updated more accurate watercourse mapping

Minimised by prior announcement

Limited additional risks as staff available to deal with.

Yes As above

Yes Will add (unknown) additional area for protection As above

Yes Will add (unknown) additional area for protection As above

Yes Will have updated more accurate watercourse mapping

Yes As above

No As above

Longer term

Yearly update

Yearly update

Yearly update

Yearly update Risk of increased clearing in these areas

Limited additional risks as staff available to deal with.

Yearly update

Yearly update Yearly update

Yearly update Yes As above

Yes Additional areas of regrowth identified and mapped

17-361 File C Page 12 of 16

Publis

hed o

n DNRME D

isclos

ure Lo

g

RTI Act

2009

From: LAZZARINI Peter [Peter.Lazzarini@dnrme.qld.gov.au]Sent: Monday, 18 December 2017 5:04 PMTo: Adrian Jeffreys; FEELY Alan; PURTILL James; Matthew PitmanCC: GUYMER Gordon; JONES Steve (DSITI); MACDONALD PeterSubject: RE: 171218_Vegetation Management options risks_table

Adrian, Adding essential habitat over proposed high value regrowth (assuming that the current Category C self-assessable code wouldapply retrospectively), would

• prevent clearing for agricultural purposes• only allow clearing with an exchange area (a type of offset) for extractive industries• have no effect on any other purpose including thinning, minor infrastructure, encroachment, fodder harvesting and

weed control. There is no option to apply to clear high value or category R regrowth through a development approval. SACS are the onlycurrent option to clear regulated regrowth. A rough estimate of the total area of essential habitat that would be mapped as high value regrowth would be about 40,000hectares (out of the 665,000 ha total). So the effect on clearing in high value regrowth would be a very small proportion of thisthe 40,000 ha considering the dot points above. There would be greater effect on clearing in new essential habitat over remnant vegetation. There would be an additionalapprox 1.7 million hectares added to the map over remnant.Clearing essential habitat under existing remnant SACs is:

• prevented for agricultural purposes, extractive industries, fodder harvesting• allowed for native forest practice, thinning, encroachment, minor infrastructure and weed control.

A change proposed to the new Thinning SAC is to prevent clearing in essential habitat. So once is in place it will have a largerimpact. Where Landholders can’t use the SACs , they can apply for a development approval through SARA to be able to clear. For adevelopment approval to be issued over essential habitat, an offset is generally required where clearing involves total removalof veg. Wetlands are a much smaller increase and therefore effect (ie 470,000 ha increase to the existing 3.6 million hectares inremnant vegetation). Clearing is generally prevented in and within a varying buffer distance of wetlands.RegardsPeter

From: Adrian Jeffreys [mailto:adrian.jeffreys@premiers.qld.gov.au] Sent: Monday, 18 December 2017 4:04 PMTo: LAZZARINI Peter <Peter.Lazzarini@dnrme.qld.gov.au>; FEELY Alan <Alan.Feely@dnrme.qld.gov.au>; PURTILL James<James.Purtill@dnrme.qld.gov.au>; Matthew Pitman <Matthew.Pitman@ministerial.qld.gov.au>Cc: GUYMER Gordon <gordon.guymer@dsiti.qld.gov.au>; JONES Steve (DSITI) <steve.jones@dsiti.qld.gov.au>; MACDONALDPeter <Peter.Macdonald@dnrme.qld.gov.au>Subject: RE: 171218_Vegetation Management options risks_table

17-361 File C Page 13 of 16

Publis

hed o

n DNRME D

isclos

ure Lo

g

RTI Act

2009

Peter,• In a regulatory sense, what difference does having an area mapped as essential habitat or wetlands make for someone

wanting to clear?• What are the consequences of the remnant and HVR additions for existing SACs?

Adrian JeffreysExecutive DirectorEnvironment PolicyDepartment of the Premier and Cabinet ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

E adrian.jeffreys@premiers.qld.gov.au P 07 3003 9314 MLevel 30 1 William Street, Brisbane QLD 4000

PO Box 15185, City East, QLD 4002

From: LAZZARINI Peter [mailto:Peter.Lazzarini@dnrme.qld.gov.au] Sent: Monday, 18 December 2017 3:51 PMTo: FEELY Alan <Alan.Feely@dnrme.qld.gov.au>; PURTILL James <James.Purtill@dnrme.qld.gov.au>; Adrian Jeffreys<adrian.jeffreys@premiers.qld.gov.au>; Matthew Pitman <Matthew.Pitman@ministerial.qld.gov.au>Cc: GUYMER Gordon <gordon.guymer@dsiti.qld.gov.au>; JONES Steve (DSITI) <steve.jones@dsiti.qld.gov.au>; MACDONALDPeter <Peter.Macdonald@dnrme.qld.gov.au>Subject: RE: 171218_Vegetation Management options risks_table Hi All,I have just heard back from our mapping people and it is unlikely that they can provide updated essential habitat mapping andwetland mapping over proposed high value regrowth areas in the second week of January 2018. They would be able to deliverit in late January. I have updated the Table to reflect this info and highlighted the changes in red.RegardsPeter Lazz

From: FEELY Alan Sent: Monday, 18 December 2017 2:18 PMTo: PURTILL James <James.Purtill@dnrme.qld.gov.au>; Adrian Jeffreys <adrian.jeffreys@premiers.qld.gov.au>; Matthew Pitman<Matthew.Pitman@ministerial.qld.gov.au>Cc: LAZZARINI Peter <Peter.Lazzarini@dnrme.qld.gov.au>; gordon.guymers@dsiti.qld.gov.auSubject: 171218_Vegetation Management options risks_table Hi see attached Table around veg regulation timing options. I think it is pretty clear the second week in January gives us better system security, more area under protection, avoids the“look “ of a Xmas eve issue, and has relatively low risk of substantive additional clearing occurring. I have highlighted the key bits, ta AlThis email is intended only for the addressee. Its use is limited to that intended by the author at the time and it is not tobe distributed without the author's consent. Unless otherwise stated, the State of Queensland accepts no liability for thecontents of this email except where subsequently confirmed in writing. The opinions expressed in this email are thoseof the author and do not necessarily represent the views of the State of Queensland. This email is confidential and maybe subject to a claim of legal privilege. If you have received this email in error, please notify the author and delete thismessage immediately

17-361 File C Page 14 of 16

s.73 - Irrelevant information

Publis

hed o

n DNRME D

isclos

ure Lo

g

RTI Act

2009

1

MILTON Kerrie

From: LAZZARINI PeterSent: Tuesday, 15 May 2018 1:08 PMTo: Matthew PitmanSubject: Clearing timeline graph

Hi Matt,Is this what you are after?RegardsPeter

Peter LazzariniDirectorVegetation | Operations SupportDepartment of Natural Resources and Mines

P: 3199 7364 M:E: peter.lazzarini@dnrm.qld.gov.auA: Level 3, 1 William Street, Brisbane QLD 4000 | PO Box15216, City East, QLD 4002W: www.dnrm.qld.gov.au

17-361 File C Page 15 of 16

s.73 - Irrelevant information

Publis

hed o

n DNRME D

isclos

ure Lo

g

RTI Act

2009

From: LAZZARINI Peter [Peter.Lazzarini@dnrme.qld.gov.au]Sent: Thursday, 7 June 2018 11:01 AMTo: Matthew PitmanSubject: RE:

Yes he does

From: Matthew Pitman [mailto:Matthew.Pitman@ministerial.qld.gov.au] Sent: Thursday, 7 June 2018 10:51 AMTo: LAZZARINI Peter <Peter.Lazzarini@dnrme.qld.gov.au>Subject:

Hi Peter, Do you know if has a PMAV over his property? Matthew

This email, together with any attachments, is intended for the named recipient(s) only; and may contain privileged andconfidential information. If received in error, you are asked to inform the sender as quickly as possible and delete thisemail and any copies of this from your computer system network.

If not an intended recipient of this email, you must not copy, distribute or take any action(s) that relies on it; any formof disclosure, modification, distribution and /or publication of this email is also prohibited.

Unless stated otherwise, this email represents only the views of the sender and not the views of the QueenslandGovernment.

Please consider the environment before printing this email.

17-361 File C Page 16 of 16

s.73 - Irrelevant information

s.73 - Irrelevant information

s.73 - Irrelevant information

Publis

hed o

n DNRME D

isclos

ure Lo

g

RTI Act

2009