FRAGMENT- BASED DRUG DESIGN Yemane Mengistu Michigan State University January 30, 2008.

55

Transcript of FRAGMENT- BASED DRUG DESIGN Yemane Mengistu Michigan State University January 30, 2008.

Page 1: FRAGMENT- BASED DRUG DESIGN Yemane Mengistu Michigan State University January 30, 2008.
Page 2: FRAGMENT- BASED DRUG DESIGN Yemane Mengistu Michigan State University January 30, 2008.

FRAGMENT- BASED DRUG DESIGN

Yemane MengistuMichigan State UniversityJanuary 30, 2008

Page 3: FRAGMENT- BASED DRUG DESIGN Yemane Mengistu Michigan State University January 30, 2008.

Annual Research and Development Expense

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

1980

1984

1988

1992

1996

2000

2004

Exp

ense

($

Bill

ions

)

40

80

120

160

Ann

ual N

ME

App

rova

ls

R & D Investment

NME ( New Medical Entities )Source : Pharma, FDA, Lehman :

Page 4: FRAGMENT- BASED DRUG DESIGN Yemane Mengistu Michigan State University January 30, 2008.

Drug Discovery Process

Target moleculeeg. Enzymes

High-throughputScreening (HTS)

Combinatorial Chemistry Natural products

Lead &Drug

optimization

N

NR2

R3

R4

N

N

X N

H

R1

R1R1

- R2 : diverse substituentX= O, S

NHHO

HO

R2

R1

OH

Toxicity Clinical trials

Page 5: FRAGMENT- BASED DRUG DESIGN Yemane Mengistu Michigan State University January 30, 2008.

Creating a Library

NH

O

ON

O

OHOH

HO H

O

H

HN

OH

OHOH

O

R

O

NH

HO

HO

HO

O

Tunicamycins

O

Thymidinyl nucleoside

A Natural Product

Sun, D., Lee, R.E. Tetrahedron Lett. 2005, 46, 8497-8501

Page 6: FRAGMENT- BASED DRUG DESIGN Yemane Mengistu Michigan State University January 30, 2008.

NH

O

R

NO

N

R2O

R1

O

HNR3

OH

O

Thymidinyl nucleoside library

Creating a Library Using Ugi Chemistry

Page 7: FRAGMENT- BASED DRUG DESIGN Yemane Mengistu Michigan State University January 30, 2008.

Creating a Library Using Ugi Chemistry

R1 OH

O

R3 H

O

R2 NH2R4 NC R1 N

NR4

O

O

H

R2

R3

Walters, W.P., Stahl, M.T., Murcko, M.A. Drug Discovery Today 1998, 3,160-178

Page 8: FRAGMENT- BASED DRUG DESIGN Yemane Mengistu Michigan State University January 30, 2008.

Creating a Thymidinyl Ugi Library

Sun, D., Lee, R.E. Tetrahedron Lett. 2005, 46, 8497-8501

Si

Et

Cl

5'-azidonucleoside

N

NH

NH

O

O

R

NO

O

N3

=SiEt

Et

SnCl2/HSPh/NEt3

R1CHO

R2COOHR3NC

NH

O

O

R

NO

O

N

R2O

R1

O

HNR3

1.HF/pyridine

NH

O

O

R

NO

N

R2

O

R1

O

HNR3

R=Me, thymidinyl,R=H, 2'-deoxyuridinyl

NH

O

O

R

NO

O

H2N

OH

Et

Page 9: FRAGMENT- BASED DRUG DESIGN Yemane Mengistu Michigan State University January 30, 2008.

Thymidinyl Ugi Library

CHO

CHO

CHONC

Cl

Cl

HOCHO

S CHOH3C

O CHO

CHO

CHO

HO2C

CO2H

CO2H

CO2HCO2H

S

I

CO2Me

OBr COOH

CO2H

HO2CCO2H

MeO CO2H

OHO2C

COOHF

MeOO

NC

NC

NC

NONC

NN

NNC

S NCO O

Sun, D.; Lee, R.E. Tetrahedron Lett. 2005, 46, 8497-8501

NH

O

R

NO

N

R2O

R1

O

HNR3

OH

O

Page 10: FRAGMENT- BASED DRUG DESIGN Yemane Mengistu Michigan State University January 30, 2008.

High-throughput Screening (HTS)

A process of assaying a large number of compounds against biological targets.

Up to 100,000 compounds can be analyzed in a day. Robots can usually prepare and analyze many plates simultaneously.

http://www.metprog.org.uk/images/manufacturing_icon.jpg

Page 11: FRAGMENT- BASED DRUG DESIGN Yemane Mengistu Michigan State University January 30, 2008.

What types of compounds become leads from an

HTS?

Page 12: FRAGMENT- BASED DRUG DESIGN Yemane Mengistu Michigan State University January 30, 2008.

HTS Drug like (Rule of 5) Lead-likeness

Molecular weight 500

# Hydrogen Bond acceptors 10

Sum of N and O

# Hydrogen Bond Donors 5

Sum of NH and OH

ClogP<5

Molecular weight ~300

Fewer Hydrogen Bond Acceptors

Sum of N and O

ClogP<3

Low to high affinity for the target receptor

Lead like behaviorDrug like behavior

Lipophilicity Lipophilicity

Congreve, M. et al. Drug Disco. Today.2003,8, 876-877Lipinski, C.A. et al. Adv.Drug Deli.Rev.1997,23,3-25.

Lipinski’s Rules (Pfizer)

Page 13: FRAGMENT- BASED DRUG DESIGN Yemane Mengistu Michigan State University January 30, 2008.

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

Potency

Rel

ativ

e M

olec

ula

r M

ass

1µM 10 nM1mM

HTShits

Drugs

Lead optimization

Drug Candidates

HTS Library

Page 14: FRAGMENT- BASED DRUG DESIGN Yemane Mengistu Michigan State University January 30, 2008.

A Typical Drug Discovery Cascade

Incr

ease

d ris

k of

fai

lure

HTS

HTS Hits

Hits actives

Lead series

Drug candidates

Drug

1,000,000

2000

1200

50-200

10

1

Opera ,T.I. J Comput. Aided Mol Des 2002, 16, 323-334

Page 15: FRAGMENT- BASED DRUG DESIGN Yemane Mengistu Michigan State University January 30, 2008.

HTS

1996 1999 2003 2004

Compounds screened 100,000 430,000 615,000 1,050,000

Average lead potency 3,000 nM 400 nM 10 nM 10 nM

Screen success 20% 50% 58% 65%

Leads per target 1.0 1.7 1.9 2.0

GlaxoSmithKline’s HTS Scoreboard

Chemical engineering news, 2004, 82 ,23-32

Page 16: FRAGMENT- BASED DRUG DESIGN Yemane Mengistu Michigan State University January 30, 2008.

Fragnomics: Fragment Based Drug Design

An approach that uses small and relatively simple molecules to make lead compounds

Fragments Lead

Target Merge andExpand

PotentialMedicinal

compounds

Look for affinity

~Enzymes, etc

Page 17: FRAGMENT- BASED DRUG DESIGN Yemane Mengistu Michigan State University January 30, 2008.

MW of Average HTS Hits and Fragments

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

Potency

Rel

ativ

e M

olec

ula

r M

ass

1µM 10 nM1mM

Fragments

HTShits

Drugs

Lead optimiza

tion

Drug Candidates

Rees D.C, Congreve M, Murray C.W, Carr R .Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2004, 3:660

Page 18: FRAGMENT- BASED DRUG DESIGN Yemane Mengistu Michigan State University January 30, 2008.

Conventional HTS approach Fragment based drug design

Fragnomics: Fragment Based Drug Design

Erlason D.A, McDowell RS, O’Brien T. J Med Chem. 2004, 47:3463-82Lewis, W.G.et al Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2002, 41,1053-1057

Kd>100µM

Page 19: FRAGMENT- BASED DRUG DESIGN Yemane Mengistu Michigan State University January 30, 2008.

Fragnomics: Fragment Based Drug Design

Kd = 6.5

HN

N O

NH

H2N

O

OO

HN

NH

HN

O

O

OHO

NH

HN

O

O

Swayze, E.E, et al.J.Med.Chem. 2003, 46, 4232-4235

Conventional HTS approach Fragment based drug design

Kd > 100M

Page 20: FRAGMENT- BASED DRUG DESIGN Yemane Mengistu Michigan State University January 30, 2008.

What Qualifies Compounds to be Fragments?

HN

N O

NH

H2N

O

OO

HN

NH

HN

O

O

Congreve, M. et al. Drug Discov.Today 2003,8, 876-877

Molecular Weight Mr ~300 Da H-bond donors (HBD) <3 H-bond acceptors (HBA) <3

OHO

NH

HN

O

O

Page 21: FRAGMENT- BASED DRUG DESIGN Yemane Mengistu Michigan State University January 30, 2008.

What Qualifies Compounds to be Fragments?

N

NH2

O

Mr =200HBD= 2HBA=3

N

NH2

O

Cl

NH

N

O

FO

IC50 = 1.3mM

IC50 = 65 nM

Fragment

Lead for protein kinase inhibitor

Congreve, M. et al. Drug Discov.Today 2003,8, 876-877

Mr =456

Molecular Weight Mr ~300 Da

H-bond donors (HBD) <3

H-bond acceptors (HBA) <3

Page 22: FRAGMENT- BASED DRUG DESIGN Yemane Mengistu Michigan State University January 30, 2008.

What Qualifies Compounds to be Fragments?

Clog P=1.92PSA=48.14

Clog P=3.07PSA= 77.6

Congreve, M. et al. Drug Discov.Today 2003,8, 876-877 Ertl, P.et. al. J.Med.Chem. 2000, 43,3714-3717

Clog P <3 A measure of Lipophilicity of a compound

Polar Surface Area (PSA) <60 A measure of permeability through the cell membrane.

N

NH2

O

N

NH2

O

Cl

NH

N

O

FO

Fragment

Lead for protein kinase inhibitor

Page 23: FRAGMENT- BASED DRUG DESIGN Yemane Mengistu Michigan State University January 30, 2008.

Some Common Drug-Based Fragments

Hartshorn, M.J., Murray, C.W.et.al. J. Med. Chem. 2005, 48, 403-413

HN

N

N

N

N

N

HN

N

S

O

O

NH2

NH

NH2

O

NH

OH

OHN

HN N

NH

N

ON

N NH

O

Ring system from drug Heterocyclic system Side chains

Page 24: FRAGMENT- BASED DRUG DESIGN Yemane Mengistu Michigan State University January 30, 2008.

Conventional HTS vs. Fragonomics Based on Central Scaffold

A library with 1 million compounds

100 X R1

100 X R2, and 100 X R3 yields

100 100 100

Variations yield a library of only 300 compounds

Carr, R, and Hann, M. Modern Drug Discov. 2002, 45-48

N N

NH

R1

HN R3

O

R2

N N

NH

R1

HN CH3

O

CH3

N N

NH

H3CHN CH3

O

R2

N N

NH

H3CHN R3

O

CH3

Page 25: FRAGMENT- BASED DRUG DESIGN Yemane Mengistu Michigan State University January 30, 2008.

Conventional (HTS) Drug Design

Screen

100 Hits

~100,000,0008

104 Hypotheticalfragments

Erlanson, D.A, Hansen, K.S. Curr Opin Chem Biol. 2004, 8,399-406.

Page 26: FRAGMENT- BASED DRUG DESIGN Yemane Mengistu Michigan State University January 30, 2008.

Conventional (HTS) and Fragment Based Drug Design

SiteA

10 Ligands

10 Ligands

Site B100 Hits

Synthesis of 10 4

compounds

10,100 Molecules

Screen

100 Hits

~100,000,0008

104 Hypotheticalfragments

Erlanson, D.A, Hansen, K.S. Curr Opin Chem Biol. 2004, 8,399-406.

Page 27: FRAGMENT- BASED DRUG DESIGN Yemane Mengistu Michigan State University January 30, 2008.

1. Prepare set of potential binding elements with a common chemical linkage group

Maly, D.J., Choong, D.J., and Ellman, J.A. Proc.Natl.Acad.Sci.USA. 2000,97,2419-2424

Fragment Based Drug Design

Page 28: FRAGMENT- BASED DRUG DESIGN Yemane Mengistu Michigan State University January 30, 2008.

1. Prepare set of potential binding elements with a common chemical linkage group

2.Screen Potential binding elements

Maly, D.J., Choong, D.J., and Ellman, J.A. Proc.Natl.Acad.Sci.USA. 2000,97,2419-2424

Fragment Based Drug Design

Page 29: FRAGMENT- BASED DRUG DESIGN Yemane Mengistu Michigan State University January 30, 2008.

Fragment Based Drug Design1. Prepare set of potential binding elements with a common chemical linkage group

2.Screen Potential binding elements

3. Prepare library of all possible combinations of linked binding elements.

Maly, D.J., Choong, D.J., and Ellman, J.A. Proc.Natl.Acad.Sci.USA. 2000,97,2419-2424

Page 30: FRAGMENT- BASED DRUG DESIGN Yemane Mengistu Michigan State University January 30, 2008.

Fragment Based Drug Design1. Prepare set of potential binding elements with a common chemical linkage group

2.Screen Potential binding elements

3. Prepare library of all possible combinations of linked binding elements.

4.Screen library of linked binding elements

Maly, D.J., Choong, D.J., and Ellman, J.A. Proc.Natl.Acad.Sci.USA. 2000,97,2419-2424

Page 31: FRAGMENT- BASED DRUG DESIGN Yemane Mengistu Michigan State University January 30, 2008.

Application of Fragment based drug design

Maly, D.J., Choong, D.J., and Ellman, J.A. Proc.Natl.Acad.Sci.USA. 2000,97,2419-2424

1. Protein kinase inhibitors

Tyrosine kinase (Src) activate numerous signaling pathways within cells, leading to cell proliferation, differentiation , migration and metabolic changes

Src kinases have been implicated in the pathology of tumors, osteoclast-mediated Bone resorption and disorders associated with T-cell proliferation

Scapin,G. Drug Discovery today. 2002, 7,2002

Page 32: FRAGMENT- BASED DRUG DESIGN Yemane Mengistu Michigan State University January 30, 2008.

Library for the Protein kinase inhibitor

NH

NOCH3

O

N OCH3

O

N OCH3

OH

N OCH3

S

N OCH3

N OCH3

OH

OH

N

NOCH3

Cl

O

N OCH3

ClCl

N OCH3

N OCH3

OH

N

S N

OO

N

OCH3

O

N OCH3

OH

1

23 4

56

9 10

78

11 12

D.J.Maly, I.C.Choong and J.A, Ellman,Proc.Natl.Acad.Sci.USA,2000,97,2419-2424

Page 33: FRAGMENT- BASED DRUG DESIGN Yemane Mengistu Michigan State University January 30, 2008.

Library for the Protein kinase inhibitor

D.J.Maly, I.C.Choong and J.A, Ellman,Proc.Natl.Acad.Sci.USA,2000,97,2419-2424

Ki =41µM

NH

NOCH3

O

N OCH3

O

N OCH3

OH

N OCH3

S

N OCH3

N OCH3

OH

OH

N

NOCH3

Cl

O

N OCH3

ClCl

N OCH3

N OCH3

OH

N

S N

OO

N

OCH3

O

N OCH3

OH

1

23 4

56

9 10

78

11 12

Page 34: FRAGMENT- BASED DRUG DESIGN Yemane Mengistu Michigan State University January 30, 2008.

Library of protein kinase inhibitor

D.J.Maly, I.C.Choong and J.A, Ellman,Proc.Natl.Acad.Sci.USA,2000,97,2419-2424

F

F

F

F

F

N OCH3

O

BrBr

O

N OCH3

N

OH

N OCH3

N

N OCH3

O

N OCH3

HO

HO

N OCH3

O

OO

N OCH3

S

N OCH3

N OCH3S

N

OCH3

H3CO

C6H5H2CO

N

OCH3N

OCH3

16

17

18 1920

1314 15

21 22 23 24

Ki= 40M

Page 35: FRAGMENT- BASED DRUG DESIGN Yemane Mengistu Michigan State University January 30, 2008.

Fragment-Based Design : Protein Kinase Inhibition

D.J.Maly, I.C.Choong and J.A, Ellman,Proc.Natl.Acad.Sci.USA,2000,97,2419-2424

Compound IC50µM

C-Src Fyn Lyn Lck

[7] 41± 5 >1000 >1000 >1000

[16] 40± 16 64± 50 400± 170 >500

[7,16] 0.064± 0.038 5.0± 2.4 13 ± 2.4 >250

N

N OCH3

N

NO

N

O

HO

OHOH

OH

NH3CO

7 16

Page 36: FRAGMENT- BASED DRUG DESIGN Yemane Mengistu Michigan State University January 30, 2008.

Entry

1

2

3

4

6

7

8

Compound

7,16, n=2

Linker c-Src IC50, M

(CH2)n

7,16, n=3

7,16, n=4

7,16, n=5

7,16, n=6

7,16, cis

7,16, trans (1R,2R)

(CH2)n

(CH2)n

(CH2)n

(CH2)n

0.0640.038

1.10.2

6.53.0

6.50.8

5.32.1

1.20.6

0.620.02

N

N N

O

HO

OH

Olinker

Correlation of linker structure with IC50 values for c-Src Inhibition

Page 37: FRAGMENT- BASED DRUG DESIGN Yemane Mengistu Michigan State University January 30, 2008.

Application of Fragment Based Drug Design

2. Matrix Metalloproteinase inhibitors

Matrix Metalloproteinases is a family of zinc-dependent endopeptidases.

Implicated in a variety of diseases including arthritis and tumor metastasis.

Conventional high-throughput screening failed to get non-peptide inhibitor.

Haiduk, P.J. et al. JACS. 1997,119, 5818-5827

Page 38: FRAGMENT- BASED DRUG DESIGN Yemane Mengistu Michigan State University January 30, 2008.

Application of Fragment Based Drug Design

2. Matrix Metalloproteinase Inhibitors

HO

N

HN

O

HO

N

O

HN

O

HO

Kd=17 mMKd=0.2 mM

IC50=57 nM

Haiduk, P.J. et al. JACS. 1997,119, 5818-5827 Puerta, D.T, Lewis J.A. JACS. 2004, 126, 8389

Page 39: FRAGMENT- BASED DRUG DESIGN Yemane Mengistu Michigan State University January 30, 2008.

Application of Fragment Based Drug Design

2 Matrix Metalloproteinase Inhibitors

O

O

FF

F

S

O

O

O

HO

O

O

IC 50 = 0.5 nM

Wada, C.K, et al. J.Med.Chem. 2002, 45, 219-232

ABT-518 , a drug candidate in clinical trial by Abbot Pharmaceutical Company

Page 40: FRAGMENT- BASED DRUG DESIGN Yemane Mengistu Michigan State University January 30, 2008.

Application of Fragment Based Drug Design

3. Thymidylate synthase (TS)

Is the sole source for production of thymidine monophosphate (dTMP). dTMP plays a central role in DNA synthesis . It has been a target for dividing cancer cells.

Banerjee D, Mayer-Kuckuk P, Capiaux G, et al. Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 2002, 1587,:164-73.

Page 41: FRAGMENT- BASED DRUG DESIGN Yemane Mengistu Michigan State University January 30, 2008.

Application of Fragment based Drug Design

SHS S S SH S S S

S

NH2

S

H2N

S

NH2

S

NH2

Screen against library of Disulfide-containing small Molecules

R NH

SS

NH2

O

Erlanson, D.A, Braisted, A.C .Proc.Natl.Acad.Sci.USA. 2000, 97 ,9367–9372

TS

Site Directed Ligand Discovery for TS

Page 42: FRAGMENT- BASED DRUG DESIGN Yemane Mengistu Michigan State University January 30, 2008.

Preparation of Disulfide-Containing Library Members

Parlow, J.J. & Normansell, J.E.Mol.Diversity 1995,1, 266-269

O

OH

N

O

O COOH 1,3-disopropylcarbodiimide (DIC)

O

O

N

O

O

NH

SS

H2N

O

O

THF

NH

S

S

HNO

O

OTFA

DCMNH2

S

SHN

O

ODMF

Page 43: FRAGMENT- BASED DRUG DESIGN Yemane Mengistu Michigan State University January 30, 2008.

Synthesis of Sulfonyl Libraries

HNS

SNH2

OO

DCM

R S

O

O

Cl

NPoly vinyl pyridine

HNS

SNH

OO

S

O

O

R

HN

S

SNH

O

O

S

O

O

RTFA

H2N

S

SNH S

O

O

R

filteration

Erlanson, D.A, Braisted, A.C .Proc.Natl.Acad.Sci.USA. 2000, 97 ,9367–9372

Page 44: FRAGMENT- BASED DRUG DESIGN Yemane Mengistu Michigan State University January 30, 2008.

Thymidylate Synthase Inhibitor

N

SO

O

N

S

O

ON

linker

linker

HN

SO

O

linker

NH

SO

O

linker

linker N

S

O

O

F

linker

N

S

O

O

linker

N

S

O

O

linker

Cl

Erlanson, D.A, Braisted, A.C .Proc.Natl.Acad.Sci.USA. 2000, 97 ,9367–9372

Selected Non selected

linker = NH

SS

O

NH2

Page 45: FRAGMENT- BASED DRUG DESIGN Yemane Mengistu Michigan State University January 30, 2008.

N

O

HO

S

O

O

R

R'

N S

O

O

O

NHCO2H

CO2H

CH3

Compund R

NH

CO2H

O CO2H

NH

CO2NH2

O CO2H

NH

CO2H

O CO2NH2

NH

CO2H

O

Ki

1100

35

61

373

246

R' Ki

NH2

O

H

NH

CO2H

O

NH

N

O

NH

O

37

noncompetitive

0.33

12

> 100 only

2

3

4

5

Compound

1 6

7

8

9

10

Erlanson, D.A, Braisted, A.C .Proc.Natl.Acad.Sci.USA. 2000, 97, 9367–9372

Page 46: FRAGMENT- BASED DRUG DESIGN Yemane Mengistu Michigan State University January 30, 2008.

Thymidylate Synthase Inhibitor

NS

O

O

CO2H

HOOC

COOHHN O

N

O

HN

H2N N NH

N

H

HOOC

COOHHN

O

H

NS

O

O

CO2H

HOOC

COOHHN

O

H

NS

O

O O

NHCOOH

MethylenetetrahydrofolateKm= 14 M

N-tosyl-D-prolineki= 1.10.25 mM

ki= 24 7 M ki= 33040 nM

Erlanson, D.A, Braisted, A.C .Proc.Natl.Acad.Sci.USA. 2000, 97 ,9367–9372

Page 47: FRAGMENT- BASED DRUG DESIGN Yemane Mengistu Michigan State University January 30, 2008.

Application of Fragment Based Drug Design

4. Cysteine Aspartyl Protease-3 ( Caspase-3)

Mediator of apoptosis ( programmed cell death).

They are responsible for the cleavage of the key cellular proteins such as cytoskeleton proteins.

Reducing the apoptotic response in diseases with dysregulated apoptosis such as myocardial infarction, stroke, traumatic brain, Alzheimer’s disease, and Parkinson diseases could benefit .

Hotchkiss, R.S. et al. Nat. Immunol. 2000, 1 , 496-501

Page 48: FRAGMENT- BASED DRUG DESIGN Yemane Mengistu Michigan State University January 30, 2008.

Tethering with Extenders-dynamically Assembling Fragments

SH SRLG S SHS S S

S

H2N

S

NH2

S

NH2

S S S

xA

Caspase-3 using extender A

SH SRLG S SHS S S

S

H2N

S

NH2

S

NH2

S S S

NH2

Caspase-3 using extender B

S S SSH

Erlanson, D.A, Hansen, K.S. Curr Opin Chem Biol. 2004, 8,399-406.

Page 49: FRAGMENT- BASED DRUG DESIGN Yemane Mengistu Michigan State University January 30, 2008.

SH

SRLGxA

S SH

OHN

S

Cl

Cl O

O

HOOCO

O

OHN

S

Cl

Cl O

O

HOOC

O

Extender A Extender B

Casp SHN

SH

O

HOOCO

Caspase-3

S

OO

Caspase-3

Casp SHN

S

O

HOOC

O

SH

O

Assembly of the Extender with Enzyme and with Fragment Library

Page 50: FRAGMENT- BASED DRUG DESIGN Yemane Mengistu Michigan State University January 30, 2008.

Casp SHN

SH

O

HOOCO

Casp SHN

S

O

HOOC

O

SH

O

S SH

H2NS

SNH

SO O

COOH

OH

H2NS

SNH

SO O

COOH

H2NS

SNH

SO O

s SO2

FRAGMENTS

S S S

Assembly of the Extender with Enzyme and with Fragment Library

Erlanson, D.A, Lam, J.W, Wesmann ,C. Nat. Biotechnol. 2003, 21, 308-314

A

B

c

Page 51: FRAGMENT- BASED DRUG DESIGN Yemane Mengistu Michigan State University January 30, 2008.

O HN

HOOC

SS

ONH

S COOH

OH

O O

H

OHN

HOOCO

NHS

O O

H

OHN

HOOCO

NHS COOH

OH

O O

H

OHN

HOOCO

NHS

O OCOOH

H

OHN

HOOCO

NHS

O OCOOH

OH

SCaspase

Extender A + Fragment A

Compound Ki( M)

2.8

15.3

>100

0.2

1

2

3

4

Erlanson, D.A, Lam, J.W, Wesmann ,C. Nat. Biotechnol. 2003, 21, 308-314

Assembling the inhibitor

Page 52: FRAGMENT- BASED DRUG DESIGN Yemane Mengistu Michigan State University January 30, 2008.

Erlanson, D.A, Lam, J.W, Wesmann ,C. Nat. Biotechnol. 2003, 21, 308-314

Assembling the inhibitor

Page 53: FRAGMENT- BASED DRUG DESIGN Yemane Mengistu Michigan State University January 30, 2008.

Caspase-3

Superimposition of Inhibitor 1(Gray) and compound 4 (salmon) with Capsase 3

Erlanson, D.A, Lam, J.W, Wesmann ,C. Nat.Biotechnol.2003 , 21,308-314

Page 54: FRAGMENT- BASED DRUG DESIGN Yemane Mengistu Michigan State University January 30, 2008.

Summary

The use of fragment based drug design accompanied by different means of detection could increase the chance of finding new medical entities.

Site directed ligand discovery and fragment based lead discovery are still in their infancy, but the success of these emerging approaches could success.

No single technology will suffice, and the combination of HTS, site directed , and fragment-based lead discovery will likely become increasingly important.

Page 55: FRAGMENT- BASED DRUG DESIGN Yemane Mengistu Michigan State University January 30, 2008.

Acknowledgements Prof. Kevin D. Walker Prof. Babak Borhan Prof. Bill Wulff Prof. Bob Hausinger Dr. Philip J. Hajduk , Abbott Laboratories

Lab members:,Mark, Irosha, Washington, Danielle, Behnaz

Friends: Khassay, Mercy, Rahman, Anil, Munmun, Luis