Foucault Hipotesis

7/30/2019 Foucault Hipotesis

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/foucault-hipotesis 1/13

PARRHESIA NUMBER9•2010•31-43

Foucault’s HypotHesis: From tHe critique oF

tHe juridico-discursive concept oF power to an

analytics oF governmentth lk

“F F!“—h h f bk b j B bh 1977.1 th f

Fh h F’ k h f b, b

f . B h h 30 h

f F’ k b h h f. t, b xh f h h, bk, phd h h

h F h f “ k”. th f h k h b hh

h. F h f f k f ,

, , , . 2

o h h f F’ h 1984 h f

. th f h Fh gouvernemental , “

”.3 th f h f h F’ k. i

h F b h ““ ““ f h hf f h

1970. a h f h h h f h b “”4

f h h h f . i h f , h

f b x. F, b b

k b h f k “h f h f ”,5 h

f f h f f-. s, h b f f h b k h h F

h k h “x f -k”.

F h f “ f h f

‘’”.6 i h b h h f

: h “’-’” f .7 th h bf

f h f h F . th f h



FoUcAUlt’SHyPotHESIS

f h f f h f 1978 1979 h cè F

“ f h ”. i h h i h h h f ff F’ k, x f ,

h. th f h h h

. i h h bk h h f

h f .

1. tHe “juridico-discursive” concept oF power

th f s lk h h x h h b

f : “The power of an individual or collectiveactor A with regard to an objective O is manifested if A achieves O by consent of one or more actors B.”8 lk h

h h b h w ff . th f

. i h h h bh h b o. B

, h f , B’ . a

lk h h f , h f hh . Bh f b h

h bk a. th h p, Hh a t

p, h h .. th Hbb, mx wb K mx.

th h f F’ f h f h

. i f h , b h f

. F b h , h

f bh : h f h f h f

f . H f h hh h b z

h.

F’ h h h w , f h

f h f : , , , . th “’-’”9

f b h f h f f () b h h h f h h. i f h h b

. F h f f h f ,

h h “ h f ”.10

F, h h b b h b z . thf F

k f h h . i h b

f, h b xh. i f ,

F f f . H h x

h f , (x h f ), z

f h f f ff:

“o b , b: , ; h

h h; h h b x

.”11

s, F h f h h

f . F - b -

, b f b . th,

f f b, h z h

. o h , h f h h f f h

. th b h —hh b f f f . a ,

h h h f k f f .12



tHomas lemKe

th, F h h h hz b f

h h f . a F, h b h h h h f x k , f , x

z bz, f k x h—h

h h h f f x,

b x. p , F, h x f ““ h h

, h b f . rh,

h : h b x

f f k .

F’ h h -1970 h h

f . th h h f h b

f f h h h f h h f h b, b

f h x f f . H, F’

h. th h b h

hz h f Discipline and Punish h f h History of sexuality.F, F h f h b

, z f h f f b. u

“nzh’ hh”,13 z h bf ,

bz. s, h “h f ” h F h

h f h x f

k h h h. a , h f h h

bh f b f b ; , b

f b b h f f b.14 i , h F’

ff h k’ h , h f z, ,

h h h “x ” 15 . i f

ff h k’ h, h h h h z b

b . p ff, h “ ff ” b h . af h,

h f : “H b h h h b f bh f h

h?”16

th f h f h F’ h cè F

1978 1979 F’ h x f b. i h h f

f h f b. o h h h, k b

h b f f b h h k f

2. tHe genealogy oF tHe modern state

th f 1978 1979 b h Security, Territory, Population The Birth of Biopolitics. th f

h F “ f h ”.17 wh F h f h

h f h f f . H

h h h h - h

h’ . lk nb e, h h - f - f

h b. B h e h f z h f (“h ”), F z h “ f

.”18 H f h f h .19 wh h h

, F b h h h 18 h h b f

x. g b

hh, , x. i b h ,

b f f-, f h f f h, f

h hh, h , h .




tk h , F h h “h f f ” f h “b

f ”.20 H b f , h f b -f b z h f

. th h “h f ‘’”21 “h f h b”,22

F h z b “ k b h

f z h f z ”.23

i h f h F x h “ f k”24 f h.

i h 1978 h h f f c gk r h

ch hh h f h , h h 1979

f h f b -b f f . a h b f h

, F f h b f b h k f a

sh, d H a F. i h b h z -b ,

f f -b: g -w b h b

f h ch sh, hh f h f, k fh, f.

F’ b h f h: h (w) h f x

b f “” “” . wh h f f h gk polis z

h, , b ., h ch h f h

h f . i z f f h k h

f h. F z h f f h x f h fh f h hh, h k

f f h. p f h h

b h x f h , h f h “ f h ”, h

f h h x . th ff b h

a gk r f h h ch h f

, h f h h k f h “ h”

f h . a b h h h f h

f h h h h . 25

a F, b h f h ch hh h 16h 17h . i z f f h f h f f

h , hh h f k b h h

h. th f f h f f h

h , h b h f . i , F z h

f “ ”. i f h h-

b f h f h p. i b f h

h “ f ” h 16h 17h , f b bk h

h f b h 18h , h f b f

h h 20h . F h h h f f

h b f . th h f b f h

f b , b h b f k: “h

hh hh b f

h f ; h , k , h f f , b f

ff .”26

th f f “ f f z”27 , h f h

f . H, b h h f

f h f h oikos. i h x, h b f

h h h f h .28 o h h f b k f

b . F z b

. rh, h b f h b h f h



tHomas lemKe

f f h f . lb

f, h f f h . lb h b h f x b— — h f f

k f . a h h f h

h , b h

f h f f f k: .29

F b “ f ”, h f f h h h

h h b f f h b h f h b x.

H h f b f f h f h h x b

. lb f b (f f h

k, f , f h .) h x f . q h

: b z h hh h x h b. i h

, f b f

. lb x h f f, h h

f— “ f”.30

B h f h f f, b h f h

. i h “f f f” b f f h h h

b “” “bz” h . a h h f b h

b x h b h f f h

f . lb f h bh f , , f f

. th b f b h f

h . i f h b f b x

, b h b b f : “ f ”31 h h

h f x f b . th x f h f

h f h h h bh f f.32

th b f f h h h b

f f. lb f bh b “h f “ h h - h - f b. a

F, h h 18h b f :

th f b f b h f , [...] b

h h f f h f h h f

. th x [...] h f f

h , h h f h ,

, b f h h , b h h b

b f.33

3. tHree tHeoretical displacements

B h h- f “h f “ f h b f

-f b, h f h f F’ k h . g h b “k ”34

“ ”35 f F’ f . i

hf “h hf”.36 F, h f ff f b h

f h ; , h ff b ;

h, h b h. i h f i k h f h

.



tHomas lemKe

a , F “h “43 f f : b b,

. p strategic games b f f h , f h b f f h. i f h h x

b -f f f . F h f h

b f , x b h f h x

f : “t , , h h h f h.

a h b b.”44 s

f b b ; h “” “b”

f b, f h “f” -k f .

Government f z, f ( “h”) h

b h x f h, f f f ( “”)

hh h b (“”) f h h . F x, h

, F h b h ch f

h f f h

. i h h , f f b ff h f .

Domination f h h b hh, x f

. F h “” f h h f hh h

b h f b f h “x f f”.45

th, F’ f f, x

hh f f b x . th hz b

h f h h bk h f bh

.46 B f h h k b h

x : h , h h ff f h f . th

f f h z, bz f h h

f . a F, h k f “”

b f .47

3.3. Politics and ethics

th f h x F’ h h

“ f h b”, hh h h f h h f h “H f x”.48

m h h h h f ,

f h f h 1970. i h h b b h h

h . F’ f b h h b h b

f . wh h h k, . i

h k f “bk“, b h k h b f h h b

h f h f h b. th f b, b

h b f h . F h f h hh

h b h “ b” x h f

f f h f f b. i h k, h h f z h

b h f h h “h f h f ”. th h hh ff b f h b, ,

hh ., f h f h .49

i x h b h h, b h f h h f f f-

h h h f f :




i hk h f z h f h b w z, h h k

h f b h f h f. l’ : h h k h b h f h—h f

h f h f. H h k h h h h f

f h h b hh h hf.

a , h h k h h h h f h f

f . th , h h b

h h h h, h , i hk . g

, h b f h , f h

h ; b, h b

h hh hh hh h f b

hf.50

th h b “” f h h h f

h h f h F’ f

h . th f h f f h f . ah k jü Hb, n F, ax Hh ch t f h b h F’

k hz b “h ”.51 th “ -

”52 h f . i h , F b f h

b f h h b h h b, h

h h.53

t h k f , F k h b b

. F, f h f h “h” h b f :

“p x f b, f h ‘f’”.54 th

h h f : “f h h f , h f

, , , b ”.55 F F h f a

f B h h h h h h h . 56

th f k h b f b h x f

h h f f b. F k f h f x b f f . p

x, F, h h f ff h b f f h: f

h f a f h f f B, h a x B.

t k f h . th f

h h h b h

h b

b. a, h h f h. th

b h , h hh h f h.

th f, b ,

h, x. o f h b f bb:

h h x z f f .57

a F, b, b “” h

f f .58 th h h h f h

. th h h x h , f

h f ff h f “ f f”.59

t h i h z b, F f h -h

Hb h: “th h h x f h

f h f, h ff, . th

f h h h b f, h h bk



tHomas lemKe

f f. i hk h x h , f b h h b

hh h f h. th b, h, h h f b h f , h

h, h , h ethos, h f f, h h f

h b.”60

4. conclusion: From Foucault’s HypotHesis to governmentality

studies

u 2004, F’ f 1978 1979 h cè F —x f h f h

1 Fb 1978—bh, b h c mh F. a ,

h k h “ f h ” h , F’

f b , k. Fh, h f

f kh h b h. F bk , hh h

ff f h f h f

. a, h h h h b b h k h h f

x h h h f.

g h x fb , h h F’ k h

h h . th fh b

h “ f h”61 h f h. Fç e, d df, g

p, p p j dz f

h, , , h f h f. th k f

h 18h 19h , h h k ch lzz, d r mh s

h f z f .62 wh h

k h b k F, f h h 15 h eh-

k . wh h f h f h h, h h b

“ ” h f f . th k h

f f f f -b h.

th b f h The Foucault Effect. Studies in Governmentality 1991

h . th , - b gh Bh, c g p m,

eh f h bh f 1978 h F x. i

b b h f h F k df, e dz, b

h k c g, gh Bh i Hk f a-sx bk. The Foucault Effect k h b f h F’ k, B, a

c. i h f b f bh h f h f

b b f f f f f- .63

th b h , b k h

x. i h 1980 1990 F f f

b b k- . i b h h

f f h x h .

th f ff h f f b. wh f f h f f ,

, f h f h f b

b b: f , hh x f h hh

f f f-. th h f x f -b f f

h f b f z ,

b h f . g h b

hf h “f” “” h f , x h x




f “ ” h h k h f “f-”

x . th h h h b “f” “h”.

Fh, h f f h f -b

x f h , h k f h f k.

th h h “” “h” h b “” “z”

b f . th b h h k f h h h (-)b

f b . th f k b

h f f f h f k f h “ f

” h “ f h k”, b h h - “ f ” f

.

i h h fh x h h f h h h

f h— h f h f

fk.64 l , , . i h , f “h”

“h” “h”. th b f f h

b h f k. th “k” b b h

f b b h. th h h,

“” fk f x b

f . i ff h h “” f f f

h b f h f f hk. i h , f

h F “h” “ f ”: “th

f b , , h, ,

b f k h ; b f , h, hh f

hh h f h h h h f h

x h h b f b h [ de leur franchissement possible ].”65

Thomas Lemke Hb-pf f s h f Bh, n

s h s s d f h gh-u Fkf/m g.

H h h, b, f

h. H b Biopolitik zur Einführung , Hb: j

v 2007; Der medizinische Blick in die Zukunft. Gesellschaftliche Implikationen prädiktiver Gentests (-

h h r Kk), Fkf m/n yk: c 2008; Governmentality. Current Issues and Future Challenges (- h uh Bök s K), n yk/

l: r (fh).



tHomas lemKe

notes

1. j B. Oublier Foucault . p: gé, 1977.

2. H bk h h : Foucault and the pol itical , Foucault and theWriting of History, Foucault and education. Disciplines and knowledge, Foucault and Feminism, Foucault and Literature, Foucault and the

Law, Foucault and the Critique of Institutions, Foucault and the Games of Truth, Foucault and Social Dialogue , Foucault Management and Organization Theory, Foucault and Religion: Spiritual Corporality and Political Spirituality , Foucault and Latin America, Michel Foucault and Theology: The Politics of Religious Experience, Foucault, Gender and the Iranian Revolution.3. s mh s, “c cx.” i mh F. Security, Territory, Population. n yk: p, 2007, 369-

401. th “” k bf F’ k. r Bh

h h “bb b b ” ( Mythologies. n yk: th n p, 1989, 130)

h 1950, h h h h f . F Bh,

f “h g b h h e f f” (130). F k

h “ ” ( Security, Territory, Population, 115), b h f h x. g

f h b h z , b h “z f

h x f ” (mh F. The Birth of Biopolitics, n yk: p,

2008, 2).

4. Security, Territory, Population, 363.

5. mh F, “th f h sf ’ (a h mh F h u f v, ob 1982”

i e. lh m, Hk g pk H. H, Technologies of the Self. A seminar with Michel Foucault . ah:

u f mh p.

6. mh F, “sb th” Michel Foucault, Ethics, Subjectivity and Truth. e. p rb. n yk: n

p, 88.

7. mh F. The History of Sexuality, vol. 1. An Introduction. t. rb H. l: p, 1980, 82.

8. s lk, . Power . l:m, 1974, 107, h : “ Die Macht eines oder mehrerer Handelnder A in Hinblick auf ein Ziel Z manifestiert sich dann, wenn A das Ziel Z durch das Einwilligen eines oder mehrerer Handelnder B erreicht.“ (h’

- f h g )

9. F, The History of Sexuality, 82.

10. mh F, “t l.” Power/Knowledge. e. c g. n yk: ph Bk, 1980, 95.

11. F, The History of Sexuality, 93.

12. o F’ f h rb j, “F - : F’ k

h, f, f .” Political Geography 26 (2007), 34-40; th lk. Eine Kritik der politischen Vernunft—Foucaults Analyse der modernen Gouv ernementalität

. B/Hb: a, 2007.13. mh F. Society must be defended . n yk: p, 2003, 14-19.

14. s p p. “p h f : F h h f

h. “e & s 22:1 (1993), 77-88; B H. Discourses of Power: from Hobbes to Foucault . oxf: oxf

u p, 1996; lk, Eine Kritik der politischen Vernunft , 110-125.

15. F, “t l,” 87.

16. mh d. Critical and Effective Histories. n yk: r, 1994, 156.

17. F, Security, Territory, Population, 354.

18. F, Society must be defended , 4.

19. s vk s. “r, r, obk.”Geschichtliche Grundbegriffe. Historisches Lexikon zur politisch-sozialen Sprachein Deutschland . e. o B, w cz, rh Kk s: K-c, 1984, 361-421; mh

s. Les arts de gouverner. Du regimen médiéval au concept de gouvernement . p: s, 1995.

20. mh F. “g.” The Foucault Effect . e. gh Bh, c g p m. H

H: H whhf, 1991, 88.

21. F, “g,” 102.

22. F, Security, Territory, p, 184.

23. mh F. “th sb p” Power. Essential Works of Michel Foucault, vol. 3. n yk: th n p,332.

24. F, Security, Territory, Population, 363.

25. F, “th b ,” 333; F, Security, Territory, Population.

26. F, “g,” 97.

27. F, “g,” 96-7

28. s F, “g,” 98.

29. s F, The Birth of Biopower , c g. “g : ” The Foucault Effect ,1-51.




30. F, The Birth of Biopolitics, 63; m Bf-Bh. Un libéralisme sans liberté. Du terme “libéralisme” dans la pensée

de Michel Foucault . p: l’H, 2001.31. F, Security, Territory, Population, 108.

32. s mh d. “lb g ah.” Economy and Society 31 (2002), 37-61; mh d.

“g hh : th f b .” Political Geography 26 (2007), 41-47.

33. F, Security, Territory, Population, 353; g, “g r,” 20.

34. B a. “g F.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 21:4 (1991), 421-440.

35. th K. “F g.” Philosophy and Social Criticism 1 (1982), 35-40.

36. mh F. The Use of Pleasure. n yk: ph, 1985, 6.

37. F, “th sb p,” 340-342.

38. F, “th sb p,” 340.

39. F, “th sb p,” 341, h .

40. F, “th sb p,” 341.

41. th F’ k f h 1970, .. h x Nietzsche, Genealogy, History:“H f b b h , h h f

f; h h f f h f

.” ( Aesthetics, Method and Epistemology, 378).

42. F, “sb th,” 299.43. mh F. “th eh f h c f h sf p f F” Ethics: Subjectivity and Truth. e.

p rb. n yk: th n p, 299.

44. F, “th sb p,” 343.

45. F, “th eh f h c f h sf,” 292.

46. F, “th sb p,” 347f.

47. H, Discourses of Power ; p p. “F‘ sb f p.” The Later Foucault. Politics and Philosophy. e.

j m. l: s, 1998, 64-77; mz lzz. “d b à b.” Multitudes 1(2000), 45-

57.

48. F, The Use of Pleasure; mh F. The Care of the Self . l: p, 1990.

49. mh F, “ab h B f h H f h sf ” Political Theory 21:2 (1993), 203; F,

“nzh, g, H.”

50. F, “ab h B f h H f h sf,” 203-204.

51. ch t. “F f h.” Political Theory 12:2 (1984), 179.

52. n F. “F m p: e ih n cf.” Praxis International 1:3

(1981), 286.

53. F, “F m p,” 283; jü Hb. “m p.” New GermanCritique 22, 3-14; jü Hb. The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity. t. Fk l. cb, ma: th

mit p, 1987.

54. F, “th sb p,” 342.

55. F, “th sb p,” 340.

56. F, “th sb p,” 340-341.

57. p, “F’ sb f p”; mh K, . Critique and Power: Recasting the Foucault/Habermas Debate. B: mit p, 1994; sh ah d o. Foucault contra Habermas. Recasting the Dialogue betweenGenealogy and Critical Theory. l: s, 1999.

58. s mh F. “o h g f eh: a o f wk p.’ Ethics: Subjectivity and Truth, 256.

59. F, “th eh f c f sf,” 283.

60. F, “th eh f c f sf,” 298.

61. F, “o h g f eh,” 325.

62. F f h () F s m. “l ’ x: “l

é“ mh F.” Travailler avec Foucault. Retours sur le politique. e. s m, m-cé n

th rb. puF: p, 2005, 13-36.

63. s f x a B, th ob nk r, . Foucault and Political Reason. Liberalism, neo-liberalism and rationalities of government . ch: u f ch p, 1996; mh d B H, .

Governing Australia. Studies in Contemporary Rationalities of Government . mb: cb u p, 1998; uh

Bök, s K th lk, . Gouvernementalität der Gegenwart. Studien zur Ökonomisierung des Sozialen .

Fkf: 2000.

64. F f f h h h f h j dz

j/g c. “c éé bé? l’ff F -x.” Esprit 11 (2005), 82-95; nk r, p o’m m v. “g.” Annual Review of Law and



tHomas lemKe

Social Science 2 (2006), 83-104; p m nk r. Governing the Present. Administering Economic, Social and Personal Life .

cb: p p, 1-25.65. mh F. “wh eh?” Power: Essential Works, vol.3. n yk: th n p, 1997, 319.

Foucault Hipotesis

Documents

Transcript of Foucault Hipotesis