Fostering Youth Employment in Public Services final report.pdf · 2 Youth employment in the EU: key...
Transcript of Fostering Youth Employment in Public Services final report.pdf · 2 Youth employment in the EU: key...
Experts’ report
Fostering Youth Employment in Public Services Report commissioned by CEEP and ETUC
April 2013
Fostering Youth Employment in Public Services
Experts’ report– April 2013
Document Control
Document Title Fostering Youth Employment in Public Services
Prepared by Claire Duchemin, Tina Weber
Checked by Tina Weber
Date April 2013
Fostering Youth Employment in Public Services
Experts’ report– April 2013
Contents
1 Introduction .........................................................................................................1 1.1 Public Services in Europe ........................................................................................................ 1 1.2 Approach and methodology ..................................................................................................... 2 1.3 Overview of the report .............................................................................................................. 2
2 Youth employment in the EU: key trends, challenges and policy interventions ......3 2.1 The crisis has aggravated the already fragile status of young people on labour markets ....... 3 2.2 Addressing youth unemployment has come to the top of the political agenda........................ 7
3 An overview of recent trends and challenges linked to youth employment in Public Services .................................................................................................... 12
3.2 The evolution of youth employment in Public Services in the context of the recession ........ 12 3.3 The importance of promoting of youth employment in public services .................................. 18
4 Fostering youth employment in Public Services: a review of initiatives and practices across Europe ...................................................................................... 24
4.1 Anticipating long-term recruitment needs in Public Services ................................................. 24 4.2 Raising the profile of Public Services as employers .............................................................. 25 4.3 Using apprenticeships and work placements to train and retain talent ................................. 26 4.4 Offering opportunities for quality training at the workplace .................................................... 29 4.5 Helping disadvantaged young people to access quality vocational training opportunities .... 30 4.6 Promoting the inclusion of disadvantaged youth via subsidised contracts ............................ 31 4.7 Adapting recruitment processes and creating fairer chances for young people to enter
and develop a career in Public Services ................................................................................ 33 4.8 Improving the representation of the interests of young employees in Public Services ......... 34
5 Bibliography ....................................................................................................... 35
1
Experts’ report
1 Introduction
This document has been prepared by ICF GHK as a background to, and to stimulate discussions at
a conference on ‘Fostering Youth Employment in Public Services’ taking place in Brussels on the
24th of April 2013.
This conference is organised as the culmination of a project jointly managed by CEEP, the
European Centre of Employers and Enterprises providing Public Services and ETUC, the
European Trade Union Confederation, with the financial support of the European Commission.
CEEP is the European association representing enterprises and employers’ organisations with
public participation and enterprises carrying out activities of general economic interest, whatever
their legal ownership or status. ETUC represents the interests of trade unionists at the European
level; it gathers 85 member organisations in Western, Central and Eastern Europe, and 10
European Trade Union Federations.
This project stemmed from the Work Programme for 2012-2014 of the European cross-industry
social partners (BUSINESSEUROPE, UEAPME, CEEP and ETUC) stating that ‘focusing on youth
and employment is the top priority for the coming year’. With more than 22% of young people being
unemployed in the EU, the issue of young unemployment is clearly a high priority where cross-
industry social partners have a role to play.
The conference will provide the opportunity to:
■ Disseminate information on the cross-industry social partner ‘Framework of Action for Youth
Employment’
■ Discuss initiatives taken by social partner organisations to support youth employment in the
Public Services
■ Exchange information on good practices as well as challenges facing Public Service employers
in seeking to offer opportunities to young people
1.1 Public Services in Europe
Public Services, also known as Services of General Interest, are services whose provider is
entrusted by a public authority (national, regional or local) with specific missions of general interest,
which can include Public Service Obligations or Universal Service Obligations. National, regional or
local public authorities decide the nature and scope of Services of General Interest as well as the
way there are operated (public authorities can provide them themselves or entrust the responsibility
to public or private entities) and therefore in practice, the operation of these services often differs
from one Member State to another.
Public Services in Europe are responsible for the delivery of essential services, which have a direct
impact on territorial and social cohesion and on the well-being of citizens as well as providing the
infrastructure for future growth and development. Public Services include ‘services of general
economic interest’ (provided for remuneration) such as postal services, telecommunications, public
transport and the supply of water, electricity and gas, as well as ‘non-economic services’ such as
police, justice and statutory social security schemes, healthcare and social work, public
administration and defence.1
Public Services employ in total around 30% of the EU’s workforce, i.e. more than 64 million
employees (CEEP, 2010). The main employment sectors in Public Services are: Health and social
work (20.5 million employees); public administration and defence (15.4 million employees);
education (15 million employees) and transport, postal services, and telecommunications (5.9
million employees).
1 This project uses the definition of Public Services elaborated as part of the ‘Mapping of Public Services’ research project undertaken
by CEEP and funded by the European Commission.
2
Experts’ report
1.2 Approach and methodology
While aiming to foster the debate on youth employment in Public Services across the EU, this
research focuses on particular on eight EU countries: Bulgaria, Denmark, France, Germany,
Greece, Italy, Netherlands and Spain.
This report builds on various elements:
■ A review of the available literature on youth employment in Public Services, including previous
research projects carried out by CEEP and ETUC and a review of key European and
international sources (including European Commission, Eurofound and OECD publications) as
well as a non-exhaustive review of the academic literature.
■ An analysis of Eurostat Labour Force Survey quarterly data on employment in Public Services
with a particular focus on youth employment (15-24 age group).
■ Interviews with national representatives of trade unions and representatives of public service
employers.
■ Findings from a seminar organised in Athens in October 2012 as part of this project, gathering
representatives of employers in Public Services and trade unions from Bulgaria, Croatia,
Cyprus, Denmark, France, Germany, Greece, Italy, the Netherlands and Spain as well as
representatives of CEEP and ETUC.
As the focus of this research project is on young people, it should be recalled that internationally
agreed definitions of ‘youth’ typically refer to the 15 to 24 age group, although the question arises
as to what extent this definition still capture the experience of today’s European youth. As both the
length of initial education and training and of school-to-work transitions is increasing, the perception
of various stakeholders is that the definition of ‘youth’ is evolving. In practice, many policies and
programmes put in place by Member States to support young people set the upper age limit for
beneficiaries at 29 years. This project adopts a flexible definition of youth (corresponding broadly to
the 15-29 age group), although some of the data presented in this report focuses on the 15-24 age
group as this is the only ‘youth’ age bracket available for some data series.
1.3 Overview of the report
This report includes:
■ A general overview of key trends and challenges related to youth employment in the EU, as
well as key policy interventions.
■ An analysis of recent trends affecting youth employment in Public Services, main rationales for
promoting youth employment in the Public services and related challenges.
■ Findings and examples from the review of initiatives and practices to foster youth employment
in Public Services.
3
Experts’ report
2 Youth employment in the EU: key trends, challenges and policy interventions
Fostering youth employment has become a top priority in the EU as current youth unemployment
rates are more than twice as high of those of adults. However, young Europeans do not form a
homogeneous group. To use the terminology used in the OECD Jobs for Youth review, two groups
of young people face particular difficulties in getting a stable job after leaving school, the ‘youth left
behind’ and the ‘poorly-integrated new entrants’ (OECD, 2010).
2.1 The crisis has aggravated the already fragile status of young people on labour markets
2.1.1 School-to work transitions are difficult for many young people, including tertiary education graduates
Concerns about lengthy school-to-work transitions are widespread even in those countries with
relatively ‘youth-friendly’ labour markets, as the recession has shown how vulnerable young people
- and especially new labour market entrants - are. Young people have typically lower employment
rates than adults due to the range of challenges they face to secure a first job, as well as remaining
in employment and finding a job matching their qualifications and expectations. In 2011, just over
24 million young people (42.7% of young people) in the EU-27 were economically active (this
category includes both those in employment and job seekers) but only 33.6% or 18.7 million were
in employment.
Lengthy school-to-work transitions can in part be explained by mismatches between the
educational profiles of young people leaving school and the level or types of qualifications required
by employers. As the overall level of educational attainment among young people has risen
continuously over the last decades and demand for (young) unskilled labour is generally
decreasing, less qualified young people such as early school leavers are at particular risk of being
‘left behind’. Mismatches can also be linked to the insufficient provision of career guidance and
counselling to young people. According to a recent Eurobarometer survey, about a quarter of
young Europeans consider the guidance they receive on education and training options and or
employment opportunities to be poor or very poor. Young people from Cyprus, France, Greece,
Ireland, Italy and Poland were most likely to complain about the low quality of guidance provision
(European Commission, 2011 b).
However, lengthy and difficult transitions are not only due to the lack of appropriate skills among
young people (ETUC, 2012); they are also explained by employers’ preferences and structural
characteristics of the labour market. Young people, as new labour market entrants, face a
disadvantaged situation as employers often prefer to recruit experienced workers. In the context of
the recession, job prospects for young graduates have been drastically reduced as they are
competing with jobseekers with more employment experience in a market with fewer jobs on offer.
Due to the lack of vacancies, some young people have to multiply experience such as in unpaid or
poorly paid internships/traineeships and traineeships, which are often not regulated at Member
State level.
2.1.2 Once in the labour market, young people are in a vulnerable position and tender to hold lower quality jobs
Labour market segmentation especially affects young people and the recession has increased the
precariousness of youth (ETUC, 2012). Indeed, a significant share of young people is only
marginally included in the labour market via fixed-terms contracts. In 2011, 42.5% of employed
young people were in temporary employment in the EU, against 14% for all employees. The extent
to which such fixed-term employment acts as a stepping stone towards more secure employment
relationships remains limited. Less qualified young workers are particularly at risk of becoming
trapped in temporary jobs, which delays their emancipation and economic independence. In
addition, the use of involuntary part-time work is also common among young people.
4
Experts’ report
Young workers are clearly overrepresented in some economic sectors (in services) and
professions (such as sales workers). Overall, they are more likely to occupy a position that does
not correspond with their level of qualification and to have ‘low-quality’ jobs. Low pay is a common
feature of many jobs held by young people in Europe, particularly young people who have limited
or no previous work experience (European Commission, 2010).
Undeclared or informal work among young people is also identified as a potential problem in a few
Member States such as Bulgaria, Greece and Spain, as it traps individuals in unprotected forms of
work, particularly where entry level wages are low.
Precariousness is also linked with the perceived level of job security among young people. In the
current economic context, many young workers are uncertain about their future. According to the
findings of the 5th European Working Conditions Survey, across the EU, 21% of young workers
reported concerns about losing their job in the next six months, against 16% of those aged 25 or
over (Eurofound, 2011 b).
2.1.3 Young people have been hit the hardest during the recession, as they are particularly vulnerable to (cyclical) unemployment
Young people tend to be among the groups most affected by restructuring, both because of the
type of work contract they hold and the occupations and sectors in which they work (Eurofound,
2011 b). Younger employees are often amongst the first to lose their jobs during a recession as
their temporary contracts are not renewed or the ‘last in, first out’ rule is applied, as companies are
more interested in retaining experienced staff.
Since 2008, youth unemployment rates, which were already relatively high in Europe prior to the
crisis, have dramatically worsened. Except Germany and Luxembourg, no other country in the EU
has been spared the surge of youth unemployment. While youth unemployment is considered a
global issue, needless to say, not all European countries – and regions- face the same level of
challenges. Between 2008 and 2011, youth unemployment rates increased by more than 20 p.p. in
Spain and Greece, and very strong increases have been recorded in Lithuania and Latvia (around
18 p.p.), Ireland (about 16 p.p.), Estonia, Cyprus, Portugal and Slovakia (between 10 and 15 p.p.).
In contrast, youth unemployment rates have remained relatively low in Austria, the Netherlands and
Germany. Other countries which performed relatively well in 2008 (with levels of youth
unemployment below 10%) such as Czech Republic, Cyprus and Denmark have experienced a
clear deterioration of the situation. For example in Denmark, youth unemployment went up from 8%
in 2008 to over 14% in 2011.
5
Experts’ report
Figure 2.1 Pre-crisis and 2011 youth unemployment rates (15-24 age group) in EU Member States
Source: Eurostat [lfsa_urgaed]
Overall, young men have been more adversely affected by the increase in unemployment, due to
their overrepresentation in sectors that were hit particularly hard by the crisis, such as construction
and manufacturing, although more recently female unemployment has also increased as cuts in the
public services begin to bite.
Differences between high and low skilled young people, new labour market entrants and young
workers have also been exacerbated in the context of the recession. Young people with low levels
of educational attainment those are particularly exposed to the risk of (long-term) unemployment.
Among both the 20-24 and 25-29 groups, the unemployment rates of low-skilled are 15 p.p. above
those of the high-skilled.
0 10 20 30 40 50
NL
AT
DE
MT
DK
SI
LU
CZ
BE
FI
UK
EU27
FR
EE
CY
SE
RO
PL
HU
BG
IT
IE
PT
LV
LT
SK
EL
ES
2011
2008
6
Experts’ report
Figure 1.1 Evolution of youth unemployment rates by age group (15-19, 20-24 and 25-29 years old) and level of educational attainment (ISCED 0-2, 3-4 and 5-6) in the EU27
Source: Eurostat [lfsq_urgaed]
2.1.4 ‘Coping strategies’ of young people include staying longer in education and training, accepting any job available or looking for more opportunities abroad…
In the current context, some young people have chosen to stay longer in education and training,
hoping that postponing their entry into the labour market will pay off in the mid-term. In some
countries, the labour market ‘pull’ effect (attracting young people out of education) observed in
previous years came to an end with the crisis - the lack of immediate job prospects for the low-
skilled youth labour market led to a reduction in early school leaving rates. For example between
2008 and 2011, Portugal and Spain experienced decreases in early school leaving rates of 8 p.p.
and -4.7 respectively, at the same time as a rise in unemployment rates among early school
leavers.
The share of temporary employment among young people (standing at around 40% in the third
quarter of 2012) has increased overall since 2008, suggesting that many young people cannot
afford being picky about jobs and accept any available job. Other strategies such as emigrating to
another country can be considered by young people as a way to ‘escape’ poor prospects at home
(ETUC, 2012).
2.1.5 But gloomy job prospects can also lead to disengagement at a young age with ‘scarring’ effect on their career and income in the longer-term
In countries where youth unemployment levels have reached record levels, such as Greece and
Spain, there is a clear danger that some young people discouraged by the lack of employment
opportunities may drift into long-term unemployment and inactivity. More generally, across all
countries, the social exclusion of young people has an adverse effect on the wider community both
economically and socially, with the potential to lead to ‘long-term costs’ in the form of increased
criminality, welfare dependency and health problems (European Commission, 2010). According to
a study led by the European Foundation for the Improvement of Working and Living Conditions, in
2008 the cost of long-term unemployment (more than 6 months) or inactivity among young people
aged 16 to 29 years old in the 21 Member States for which data is available2 amounted to at least
2 Denmark, Greece, Finland, France, Malta and Sweden are excluded in the estimation due to missing statistical
variables.
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35 2
00
5Q
1
20
05
Q2
20
05
Q3
20
05
Q4
20
06
Q1
20
06
Q2
20
06
Q3
20
06
Q4
20
07
Q1
20
07
Q2
20
07
Q3
20
07
Q4
20
08
Q1
20
08
Q2
20
08
Q3
20
08
Q4
20
09
Q1
20
09
Q2
20
09
Q3
20
09
Q4
20
10
Q1
20
10
Q2
20
10
Q3
20
10
Q4
20
11
Q1
20
11
Q2
20
11
Q3
20
11
Q4
20
12
Q1
Y15-19, ISCED 0-2 Y15-19, ISCED 3-4 Y20-24, ISCED 0-2
Y20-24, ISCED 3-4 Y20-24, ISCED 5-6 Y25-29, ISCED 0-2
Y25-29, ISCED 3-4 Y25-29, ISCED 5-6
7
Experts’ report
EUR 2 billion per week to society, the equivalent of 1.1% of GDP in total, even excluding costs
such as unpaid taxes on foregone earnings, costs for health and criminal justice. The re-integration
into employment of just 10% of these people would create a yearly saving of more than EUR 10
billion (Eurofound, 2011 c).
National research also suggests that early labour market failure is costly. In Sweden, according to
a study from the Swedish Institute for Labour Market Policy Evaluation (IFAU), for those who were
unemployed directly upon leaving initial education, the probability of being unemployed five years
later was as high as 16%, and the reduction in their annual earnings averaged 17% (Eurofound,
2011 b).
2.2 Addressing youth unemployment has come to the top of the political agenda
Both across all Member States and at the European level, fostering youth employment has become
an urgent policy goal.
At a EU level, the strategy Europe 2020 and its flagship initiatives, including ‘Youth on the Move’,
emphasise the need to provide adequate support to young people and enhance the performance of
education systems in order to facilitate the entry of young people into the labour market and
generally reduce youth unemployment. The Commission ‘Youth Employment Package’3 released in
December 2012 reiterates the need for Member States and EU to combine their efforts to improve
the situation of young people, mobilise EU financial support and instruments in this regard, develop
innovative approaches supporting the transitions from school to work and supporting youth labour
market mobility. The European Commission has in particular called upon Member States to provide
‘Youth Guarantees’, i.e. ensuring that all young people are offered a job, further education or
activation measures within four months of leaving school4.The proposal has been supported by
various stakeholders both at the institutional level and among youth organisations.
Government and social partners have not stayed idle and many initiatives have been put in place to
support youth employment in general (European Commission, 2011), although in some countries
austerity measures have limited the margin of manoeuvre for implementing youth measures and
programmes. In a difficult socio-economic context, social dialogue mechanisms have been under
considerable strain in many countries; the consensus on social dialogue broke down in Ireland,
Portugal and Spain (Eurofound, 2011 a) which has also had an impact on some of these
programmes.
2.2.1 Social partners across the EU are highly aware of and have fully acknowledged the challenges facing young jobseekers and workers
Across Europe, social partners generally agree on the scale of the problem and on the need to
foster employment opportunities for young people. While there is broad agreement between social
partners on the need to further develop apprenticeships and reform education systems, employer
organisations and trade unions also pursue specific agendas (Eurofound, 2011 a).
Key concerns for employers relate to the perceived mismatch between education and training
outcomes and skills required by the labour market on the one hand, and labour market reforms on
the other hand. Some employer organisations have argued that minimum wages, and legislation
regulating probation and dismissal and unemployment protection are an obstacle to hiring young
workers.
For trade unions, key priorities are the reform of education systems (including the use of
apprenticeships to train and retain young workers) as well as measures to improve school to work
transition and improve the quality of jobs held by young people. The recession has also led some
trade unions to campaign more actively to recruit more young workers (Eurofound, 2011 a).
3 http://ec.europa.eu/social/main.jsp?langId=en&catId=89&newsId=1731&furtherNews=yes
4 A draft Council recommendation on Youth Guarantees has been put forward by the Commission - as part of its Youth
employment Package. COM(2012) 729 final.
8
Experts’ report
2.2.2 In many countries, major strategic policy initiatives or packages of measures for youth employment have been launched in response to the crisis
For example, in Bulgaria, youth unemployment was established as a major issue on the
employment agenda at the start of 2012, the Ministry of Labour and Social Policy convened an
urgent meeting with social partners and stakeholders involved in youth unemployment for
development of strategy with the problem of youth unemployment in Bulgaria. As a result, a
national initiative called ‘Jobs for young people in Bulgaria’ was adopted in March 2012. This
initiative aims to create new job opportunities for young people and to reduce the youth
unemployment rate by 5%.
In many countries, different waves of measures have been taken in response to the deterioration of
the youth situation over the last years. In Denmark, for example, a series of youth packages have
been adopted since 2009 to boost youth employment, the most recent adopted in November 2012
(see Box 2.1).
Box 2.1 Youth Packages in Denmark
Tackling youth unemployment has become a clear priority in Denmark. Today, there are approximately
100,000 young unemployed persons and other recipients of unemployment or welfare benefits. The latest
Youth Package was adopted in November 2012 as part of the 2013 budget. The agreement on a ‘Youth
package - Training and job experience to help young people get jobs’ was adopted by the Government and
the Unity party. The package includes various initiatives and has a total budget of € 86 million. The measures
target two main target groups: young persons on unemployment benefits or cash benefits without
qualifications as well as newly qualified young persons who need support to access a first job.
The measures that target low-skilled young persons on unemployment benefits are the following:
■ A total of € 9 million will be set aside to allow 950 young persons to enter ‘bridge building programmes’
(gradually introduction to a vocational school) over the next two years.
■ A total of € 2 million will be set aside from 2013-2014 for connecting traineeship advisers in vocational
schools to the bridge building programme. Traineeship advisers will be the main contact point for
participants and will also be responsible for identifying companies that can provide training places.
■ A further € 24 million will be allocated to support to the development of adult apprenticeship (across all
sectors) from 2013-2016 and to encourage an additional 1,050 persons to take part. Companies can
receive a subsidy if they train young adults as apprentices.
Other measures target newly qualified young persons:
■ The ‘job rotation scheme’ will receive an additional funding of € 36 million between 2012-2016 with a view
to allow 2,100 unemployed young people to get a footstep in the labour market (replacing young people
on leave). Young person with a master’s degree will also be able to enter the scheme during a during a
two-year trial period.
■ A vocational pilot scheme targeting young craftsmen (under the age of 30) will be launched for a budget
of € 1 million for 2013-2015. The scheme allows small and medium-sized companies a subsidy for six to
twelve months for hiring a young craftsman.
■ The knowledge pilot programme supporting hiring of highly-qualified young people with an academic
background) in small and medium-sized companies will benefit from extra support (€ 12 million) to
support the hires of 400 new graduates. Furthermore, the programme is extended to including young
graduates with a bachelor degree during a two-year period.
The Youth Package will primarily be financed by a reorganizing of priorities within the Ministry of Employment,
while the strengthening of the knowledge pilot programme is financed by redirecting priorities within the
Ministry of Education as well as funds transferred from the research reserve funds. The implementation of the
agreement is to be evaluated with a view to assess if the continuation of measures is needed.
In the Netherlands, key developments in the area include the Investment in Youth Act which came
into force on 1 October 2009, guaranteeing that young people aged 18-27 are offered work or
education opportunities (or a combination of the two) and strengthening the strong conditionality for
receiving social benefits. In addition the Dutch ‘Action plan on youth unemployment’ introduced in
September 2009 included a wide range of measures. As the Action plan ended in 2011, while the
youth employment situation has deteriorated since then, Dutch trade unions are now advocating for
a revival of the plan.
9
Experts’ report
In France, various youth strategies, plans and measures have been launched in recent years. An
Emergency Plan for Youth Employment was adopted in April 2009 and a national governmental
plan ‘Acting for youth’ was launched in September 2009 with a view to tackling the problems facing
young people in a more comprehensive fashion (covering a series of mutually reinforcing
objectives in the field of education, employment and social policies). The current government has
also made youth clear priority and has already introduced new schemes and policies; the main
lines of a comprehensive strategy for youth, covering among others access to employment,
education, guidance, and other social and cultural objectives were recently presented5.
In Spain, despite of the disproportionate impact of the crisis on young people the development of a
comprehensive strategy for youth employment has taken place relatively late. The government and
social partners have recently announced that they have reached an agreement for a Youth
entrepreneurship and Employment Plan for 2013-2016 (See Box 2.2). Prior to that, specific support
measures to support youth employment had been taken in the framework of Spain’s Employment
Strategy 2012-20146 and in the Employment Policy Annual Plan for 2012 whose first objective is to
‘cut down the youth unemployment rate’.
Box 2.2 The Strategy for Entrepreneurship and Youth Employment 2013-2016 in Spain
The Strategy, presented in March 2013, was elaborated by the Ministry of Employment and Social Security
with the participation of Social Partners. With a total budget of EUR 3.5 billion (or EUR 800 million per year),
the Strategy aims to cover both the structural problems of youth unemployment and those that have arisen in
the context of the recession. Its four objectives are to help improve the employability of young people, to
increase job quality and stability, to promote equal opportunities and focus on the needs of young people at
risk of social exclusion and to promote entrepreneurship.
To achieve these objectives, the Strategy includes 100 measures. Among these, 15 ‘emergency measures’
focus on education, training and improved employability, the promotion of entrepreneurship and self-
employment, guidance, support and improvement of mediation by public employment services and partner
organisations and the provisions of hiring incentives. In addition, 85 medium and long-term in initiatives are
set in relation with the above-mentioned priorities as well as improving foreign language skills and the use of
technological tools, the promotion of equal opportunities and public-private sector collaboration in employment
services. None of the measures foreseen by the plan has a specific focus on the promotion of youth
employment in Public Services.
Another objective of the Strategy is to encourage various stakeholders such as Autonomous Communities,
local authorities, public and private employers to contribute through additional initiatives at their level. Any
organisation that wishes to adhere to the Strategy must provide information to Ministry of Employment and
Social Security on the type of initiative taken, available funding available, implementation and the number of
beneficiaries; the Ministry may give special recognition to organisations or initiatives which bring a significant
contribution to the Strategy.
2.2.3 A wide range of measures have been implemented at the national level with a view to support youth employment
Measures to support young people include ALMPs and extra support from public employment
services (including as part of ‘Youth Guarantees’) and hiring subsidies/bonus or social security
rebates. In addition, a few countries have reformed their labour legislation to remove or reduce
employment protection for young workers, with a view reduce barriers to labour market entry for
young workers expand and (temporary) work opportunities for young people. For example in the
Netherlands, since July 2010, a temporary measure was introduced to increase the maximum
5 http://www.jeunes.gouv.fr/IMG/pdf/CIJ_Rapport_21_fevrier_2013.pdf,
6 Royal Decree 1542/2011, on October 31st (Spanish Official Journal - BOE 19-11-2011)
10
Experts’ report
number of consecutive fixed-term contracts (from 3 to 4)7. In Spain, the 2010 labour law reform
introduced changes to the legal protection of young workers. In Greece, following a reform of
labour law, young workers under the age of 25 can be paid 84% of the national minimum wage in
an effort to encourage employers to offer opportunities to young workers.
However, such reforms have been highly contested, as indeed young people are one of the groups
of workers most affected by labour market segmentation. The effects of employment protection
legislation on youth employment are not clear-cut and are indeed, difficult to measure (ETUC,
2012). There is a danger that further deregulation could deepen divisions between generations and
worsen the quality of youth employment, with young people being disproportionately
disadvantaged. In the context of the recession, it has been argued that the prime objective has
moved to ‘getting young people into work’ at the expense of the quality of youth employment
(Eurofound 2011 a).
2.2.4 Apprenticeship-type programmes are increasingly regarded as highly effective mechanisms for facilitating youth integration on the labour market
One of the most noticeable trends in youth policy developments in the context of the recession is
the emphasis put by national governments - often with the support of social partners - on the
promotion of apprenticeships (or ‘dual learning’ systems combining in-company on-the job training
and off-the job school training), including subsidies and taxation incentives for employers to train
young workers. Indeed, of all forms of education and training, apprenticeships are the most directly
connected to the labour market. By facilitating the contact between young people and potential
employers, apprenticeships can aid rapid school-work transitions for students and recruitment
process for employers. In contrast with trainees or interns, apprentices are generally paid and
covered by a contract and collective agreement. Apprenticeship systems typically imply a strong
involvement of social partners in the governance and rely on a strong level of commitment and
investment in training from employers.
Regulated apprenticeship systems have attracted a lot of interest in recent years as they play a
crucial role in the education and training systems of many countries with low unemployment rates
such as Germany and Denmark. In Germany, for example, the low rates of youth unemployment
are undoubtedly due to the favourable economic situation and demographic developments, but
also to the role of ‘dual training’ enabling young people to smoothly enter into the labour market.
Dual training is considered as a high value pathway into the labour market and is chosen by about
two thirds of each youth cohort leaving general education. It is also advantageous for many
employers who see it as a way of preventing future shortages of skilled staff. Therefore, the
development of the system is strongly supported by social partners (ICF GHK, 2012 a).
Several European countries have recently sought to take some inspiration from the German dual
system. For example, very recently a Memorandum of Understanding to promote youth
employment was signed by the labour and education ministries of Germany and Italy, which covers
among other topics cooperation in vocational education. Spain has also initiated a reform to
introduce progressively a dual vocational training system in the country (ICF GHK, 2012 b). The
purpose of the reform is to increase the participation of enterprises in vocational training, adapt the
training offer to labour market needs and develop closer ties between young people and employers
with a view to facilitate labour market insertion.
Apprenticeship systems, however, have also been put under considerable strain in recent years,
including in Germany (European Commission, 2012 b). The number of available training
placements has experienced a remarkable downward trend in nearly all Member States, as
employers are more reluctant to offer train or even pay apprentices. In response to the general
shortage of apprenticeships placements, many countries have used financial or other incentives
for companies to increase the number of apprenticeship offers and to encourage young people to
7 The Law of 30 June 2010 (temporarily expanding the opportunity foreseen in Article 668a of Book 7 of the Civil Code to
use fixed-term contracts to promote of youth employment) foresees that unless a later point in time is agreed upon by
royal decree (not later than 1 January 2014), the provisions will expire with it remaining applicable for the employee
whose employment contract on 1 January 2012 or the later determined point in time meets the conditions laid out in the
law.
11
Experts’ report
take up apprenticeships (Eurofound, 2011 d; see also Box 2.3). Increasing emphasis is being
placed on the proper targeting of such subsidies to adverse long-term effects or perverse
incentives.
Some countries which do not have a well-developed apprenticeship system have also sought to
encourage other work placement and traineeship programmes (not leading to the acquisition of
qualification) or to improve their quality. In Bulgaria for example, the revision of the status of
traineeships in the Labour Code is currently on the agenda. Proposals for amendments suggested
by the trade union CITUB after consultation with other social partners are being examined by the
Ministry of Labour and Social Policy8.
Box 2.3 Measures to support the supply of apprenticeship placements: examples from Germany and France
In France, to support the increase of the number of apprenticeship contracts, significant financial help for
employers hiring apprentices such as the reduction of non-wage labour costs or exceptional subsides for
hiring a young apprentice have been proposed. The programme called ‘No apprentice without an employer’
involving training centres, public employment services and chambers of commerce has been implemented,
with an additional budget of EUR 100 million to reinforce the apprenticeship training offer.
Such subsidies can also focus on specific groups of young people at risk. For example in Germany, the
government has facilitated extension of apprenticeship placements through the provision of a training bonus
of up to €6,000 to employers offering an additional placement to a disadvantaged young person who has
been seeking training for 12 months or more. Another strategy used in Germany with a view to increase the
number of apprenticeships placements is to rely on voluntary tools and social dialogue. The ‘National Pact for
vocational training and promoting next generations’ specialists’ (the latest version of this Pact covers the
years 2010 to 2014) brings together the employers’ organisations, the federal Government and the Länder, its
aims was to agree on targets for the provisions of apprenticeship placements by employers.
8 Source: Information provided by CITUB (Confederation of Independent Trade Unions in Bulgaria) representative
12
Experts’ report
3 An overview of recent trends and challenges linked to youth employment in Public Services
This chapter provides a brief overview of the recent trends in employment of young people in
Public Services in the EU and explores the key rationale for promoting youth employment in
Services of General Interest.
Box 3.1 Available data on youth employment in Public Services at the EU level
The data presented in this report to measure youth employment and temporary employment in Public
Services is drawn from the quarterly Labour Force Survey (Eurostat) with a breakdown by sectors following
the NACE classification Rev. 2 (1-digit and 2-digit levels). This data is available since the first quarter of
2008. The figures presented in this chapter should be interpreted with caution, due to significant data
limitations. First, the only ‘youth age bracket’ available for this data is the 15-24 age group. In addition, due
to data limitations in terms of level of detail and coverage of the data from the LFS, the total volume of
(youth) employment in Public Services/Services of General Interest cannot be estimated.
The data presented in this report focuses on a selection of Public Services (NACE Rev.2 2-digit level, or 1-
digit level for temporary employment) for which data is available for the 15-24 age bracket:
■ Electricity, gas, steam and air conditioning supply,
■ Waste collection, treatment and disposal activities; materials recovery,
■ Postal and courier activities,
■ Scientific research and development,
■ Public administration and defence; compulsory social security,
■ Education
■ Human health activities
■ Residential care activities
■ Social work activities without accommodation
■ Libraries, archives, museums and other cultural activities
No data is available for some subsectors (3 or 4-digit level of the NACE classification Rev. 2) providing
Services of General Interest (this includes Silviculture and other forestry activities, Support services to
forestry, Land transport and transport via pipelines, Inland passenger water transport, Warehousing and
support activities for transportation, Programming and broadcasting activities, Wired telecommunications,
Satellite telecommunications activities, Central banking, Activities of employment placement agencies and
Funeral and related activities). Data is not available for the 15-24 group for some sectors (2-digit level of the
NACE classification Rev. 2) providing Services of General Interest such as Water collection, treatment and
supply, Remediation activities and other waste management service, Sewerage and Veterinary activities.
Youth employment in the share of the Air transport sector considered as Public Services cannot be
estimated on the basis of available data.
In addition, data from Cedefop forecasts (IER estimates) presented in this report, also based on the Labour
Force Survey, focuses on the following sectors: Electricity, gas and water, Public administration and
defence, education and Health and social work.
3.1 The evolution of youth employment in Public Services in the context of the recession
3.1.1 Youth employment in Public Services has been quite resilient in the context of the recession, although this general trend hides diverging trends across sectors
Across the EU, in the third quarter of 2012, more than 3.5 million young people were working in
sectors providing Services of General Interest9. Among Public Services, the sector that currently
9 Data limitations do not allow to allow to measure the total youth employment in Public Services. Amore sophisticated
analysis of LFS employment data carried out as part of study commissioned by CEEP on the evolutions of Public Services in Europe (Cambridge Econometrics, 2013), provides relatively similar results in terms of volume of youth
13
Experts’ report
employs the largest number of young people is the health sector (about 800,000 jobs), followed by
public administration (about 700,000 jobs) and the education sector (about 650,000 jobs). The
sectors of residential care and social work employ each about 450,000 young people. In
comparison, other sectors including utilities, postal services, cultural activities and research
concentrate much lower volumes of youth employment.
Figure 3.2 Number of young people employed (15-24) by sectors in the third quarter of 2013 in thousands, EU-27
Source: Eurostat, Labour Force Survey [lfsq_egan22d]. Note: The selection of sectors for which
data is displayed (NACE Rev.2 2-digit level) does not cover the entire range of Services of General
Interest.
Overall, the number of young people employed in Public Services has declined across the EU in
recent years – there were 237,000 less young people working in Public Services in the third quarter
of 2012 than at the start of 2008. However, a comparison with trends across the entire economy
shows that youth employment in Public Services has overall proved quite resilient during the
recession, as it has reduced in a smaller proportion that total youth employment.
employment (15-24) in Public Services: 3.57 million young people aged 15-24 in 2010, accounting for 6% of all employees in sectors providing Services of General Interest.
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900
Scientific research and development
Libraries, archives, museums and other cultural activities
Waste collection, treatment and disposal activities; materials …
Electricity, gas, steam and air conditioning supply
Postal and courier activities
Social work activities without accommodation
Residential care activities
Education
Public administration and defence; compulsory social security
Human health activities
14
Experts’ report
Figure 3.3 Evolution of the number of young people (15-24) employed in Public Services (selected sectors) and in the entire economy, EU-27
Unit: % of levels in the first quarter of 2008 (2008Q1 = 100%)
Source: Calculations based on Eurostat, Labour Force Survey [lfsq_egan22d]. Note: The selection
of sectors of Public Services does not cover the entire range of Services of General Interest.
As in the case for total employment in Public Services, the evolution of youth employment in
Services of General Interest is differentiated across sectors. Indeed, a noticeable decrease of the
number of young people employed has been felt in sectors that have suffered an overall reduction
of their workforce such as the health sector, public administration and postal activities. On the other
hand, positive developments in youth employment have been recorded in residential care and in
the electricity sector. Levels of youth employment have remained relatively stable since the
beginning of 2008 in sectors such as social work, scientific research, libraries and museums
despite of the recession.
Figure 3.4 Number of young people (15-24) employed by sectors, in thousands, EU-27
Source: Eurostat, Labour Force Survey [lfsq_egan22d].
80%
85%
90%
95%
100%
105%
110%
20
08
Q1
20
08
Q2
20
08
Q3
20
08
Q4
20
09
Q1
20
09
Q2
20
09
Q3
20
09
Q4
20
10
Q1
20
10
Q2
20
10
Q3
20
10
Q4
20
11
Q1
20
11
Q2
20
11
Q3
20
11
Q4
20
12
Q1
20
12
Q2
20
12
Q3
Public services (selected sectors)
All sectors
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
20
08
Q1
20
08
Q2
20
08
Q3
20
08
Q4
20
09
Q1
20
09
Q2
20
09
Q3
20
09
Q4
20
10
Q1
20
10
Q2
20
10
Q3
20
10
Q4
20
11
Q1
20
11
Q2
20
11
Q3
20
11
Q4
20
12
Q1
20
12
Q2
20
12
Q3
Electricity, gas, steam and air conditioning supply
Waste collection, treatment and disposal activities; materials recovery Postal and courier activities
Scientific research and development
Public administration and defence; compulsory social security
Education
Human health activities
Residential care activities
15
Experts’ report
3.1.2 Gender imbalances in Public Services also apply to younger categories of staff
In the third quarter of 2013, around two thirds of young people employed in Public Services (2.3
million persons) were female10
. This gender ratio has not changed significantly in the last four
years, and has not been affected the decrease of the total volume of youth employment in Public
Services. The overrepresentation of women is not specific to the youth age bracket but is
characteristic of the workforce of Public Services as a whole11
- the percentage of female
employees has remained at around 63-64% since 2008. Indeed Public Services include some
traditionally female-dominated professions in education, healthcare, public administration, etc. and
are generally considered as more attractive for women due to more ‘family-friendly’ working
conditions (Cambridge Econometrics, 2013).
3.1.3 Young Europeans have been and remain underrepresented in Public Services
Since 2008, the general trend in Europe is towards the decrease in the share of young people in
the total employed population. This has also been observed across most of Public Services.
According to the latest figures available from Eurostat, young people account for a little less than
6% of the workforce in Public Services, compared to about 9% of the entire workforce and just over
10% of the active population.
Figure 3.5 Share of young people (15-24) in the active population, in the total workforce and in the workforce of Public Services (selected sectors), EU-27
Source: Calculations based on Eurostat, Labour Force Survey [lfsq_egan22d]. Note: The selection
of sectors of Public Services does not cover the entire range of Services of General Interest.
10
Calculations based on Eurostat, Labour Force Survey [lfsq_egan22d], based on a selection of sectors in Public Services. Note: due to data limitations, this selection does not include some sectors which traditionally employ more men such as rails and public transport. 11
According to the mapping study mandated by CEEP including a more sophisticated and comprehensive analysis of employment data in Public Services, in 2010, women made up about 58% of all employment in Services of General Interests in 2010
5,00%
6,00%
7,00%
8,00%
9,00%
10,00%
11,00%
12,00%
20
08
Q1
20
08
Q2
20
08
Q3
20
08
Q4
20
09
Q1
20
09
Q2
20
09
Q3
20
09
Q4
20
10
Q1
20
10
Q2
20
10
Q3
20
10
Q4
20
11
Q1
20
11
Q2
20
11
Q3
20
11
Q4
20
12
Q1
20
12
Q2
20
12
Q3
% of young people in workforce, Public Services (selected sectors)
% of young people in workforce, all economic sectors
% of young people in active population
16
Experts’ report
Figure 3.6 Share of young people (15-24) in the workforce by sector in the third quarter of 2012, EU-27
Source: Calculations based on Eurostat, Labour Force Survey [lfsq_egan22d]. Note: The selection
of sectors of Public Services does not cover the entire range of Services of General Interest.
The sector of residential care activities is however an exception, as the share of young workers in
the workforce in this sector, at about 10%, is slightly higher than the average across the entire
economy. In addition, the shares of young workers in the sectors of social work activities and postal
and courier activities are also close to the average. In contrast, Public Services where young
people are the most underrepresented are public administration, scientific research and
development and education, where less than 5% of employees are under the age of 25. However,
in these sectors which typically require relatively high levels of qualifications and recruit via open
competitions, looking at the age bracket 15-24 is probably not relevant to monitor developments in
youth employment.
In addition, a more detailed analysis at the national level for the age group 15-24 shows that there
are significant differences in youth representation across sectors of Public Services and countries.
For example, as shown in Figure 3.7, Italy is characterised by low shares of young people in the
workforce, compared to Germany, Denmark or France. In the Netherlands, young people are
relatively more likely to be employed in the sector of residential care.
Figure 3.7 Share of young people (15-24) in the workforce in the sectors of Education, Health, Public administration and Residential Care, 3
rd quarter of 2012,
Source: Calculations based on Eurostat, Labour Force Survey [lfsq_egan22d]. Note: Data is not
available for some sectors and/or countries.
0,0% 2,0% 4,0% 6,0% 8,0% 10,0% 12,0%
Education
Scientific research and development
Public administration and defence; compulsory social security
Public services (selected sectors)
Waste collection, treatment and disposal activities; materials …
Human health activities
Electricity, gas, steam and air conditioning supply
Libraries, archives, museums and other cultural activities
Postal and courier activities
Social work activities without accommodation
All economic sectors
Residential care activities
0
0,02
0,04
0,06
0,08
0,1
0,12
0,14
0,16
BG DE DK EL ES EU27 FR IT NL
Education Health Public administration Residential Care
17
Experts’ report
3.1.4 Across the EU, young people working in Public Services are in average more likely to work under temporary contracts
Another important concern relates to the quality of job opportunities offered to young people
working in Public Services. Indeed, the proportion of young people employed on temporary
contracts is higher in Public Services than across the entire economy and is following an upward
trend. In the third semester of 2012, the share of temporary employment among young employees
in Public Services is about 47% on average, compared to 40% across all economic sectors. A
small majority of young people working for public administration (52.9%) and close to half of young
employees in the education and electricity and gas sectors had a temporary contract.
Figure 3.8 Share of temporary employment among young employees (15-24) by sectors in the third quarter of 2012, EU-27
Source: Calculations based on Eurostat, Labour Force Survey [lfsq_etgan2], [lfsq_egan2]. Note:
The selection of sectors of Public Services (NACE Rev 2 1-digit level sectors) does not cover the
entire range of Services of General Interest.
Labour market segmentation (within and between organisations) and the quality of job
opportunities offered to new entrants are a key concern in Public Services. Changing contractual
relationships have become an important issue in sectors such as postal services, public transport
and central public administration (CEEP, 2010 b)
The use of fixed-term contracts among younger employees is not even across all countries and
sectors of Public Services in Europe, also depending on the type of legal provisions regulating
these contracts. These provisions also depend on the type of sector and the ‘typical’ employment
relationship in the sector.
For example, in the field of education, in the majority of European countries, teachers are
employed as public sector employees or on a contractual basis (permanently or temporarily), while
in a few other countries, teachers are employed as career civil servants (appointed for life). In
some cases, various types of employment relationships for teachers can coexist in the same
country (ETUCE, 2010 a).
The same situation can also be observed in other sectors.
■ For example within public administration, in the Netherlands for instance, young employees are
typically offered temporary contracts (for a maximum duration of three years. In some cases,
municipalities can make agreements for other shorter, types of contracts with lower levels of
protection (in terms of social security scheme, pension etc.)12
. In the sectors of health and
social care, especially home care and elderly care, new starters are more likely to work under
temporary and/or part-time contracts (EPSU, 2012).
12
Source: Information provided by FNV (Federatie Nederlandse Vakbeweging) representative
20,0% 25,0% 30,0% 35,0% 40,0% 45,0% 50,0% 55,0%
All economic sectors
Water supply; sewerage, waste management and remediation activities
Human health and social work activities
Public Services (selected sectors)
Education
Electricity, gas, steam and air conditioning supply
Public administration
18
Experts’ report
■ In France, a part of young people working for central and local public administrations is
employed under fixed-term contracts as ‘contractual agents’ while the vast majority of staff has
a civil servant status. Such temporary contracts are in generally linked to administrative
positions, but not exclusively.
■ In Italy, although no detailed data on national sources is available on fixed-term contracts,
temporary contracts and ‘collaboration contracts’ (not covered by collective agreements) in
central and local public administration and in the health sector, the forms of precarious
contracts are known to be particularly widespread among the youngest categories workers.
The use of such forms of contracts has been encouraged by the ‘ban on hiring’ applicable to
permanent positions over the last decade13
.
■ In Germany, young workers in health in social care overrepresented among those in so-called
‘mini-jobs’ (EPSU, 2012).
3.2 The importance of promoting of youth employment in public services
3.2.1 Large numbers of workers in Public Services are expected to retire in the coming years
As a consequence of demographic trends and of the gradual ageing of their workforce, Public
Services are expected to lose a significant share of their staff due to retirement in a relatively short
period. Older workers are clearly overrepresented in the workforce in Public Services - today, one
out of three employees in Public Services is aged 50 or beyond, compared to about 28% of
employees in the economy as a whole. In both Public Services and the entire economy, the shares
of older workers has already increased significantly in the last years, while the gap between Public
Services and the rest of the economy has remained unchanged, at about 5 percentage points.
Figure 3.9 Share of employees aged 50 and over in the workforce (15+) by sectors , EU-27
Source: Calculations based on Eurostat, Labour Force Survey [lfsq_egan22]. Note: The selection
of sectors of Public Services does not cover the entire range of Services of General Interest.
According to the latest forecasts available from Cedefop, the number of employees leaving for
retirement (also known as the ‘replacement demand’) over the 2010-2020 period will amount to 7.4
million in health and social work, 5.8 million in education, 4.6 million in public administration and
defence and 0.5 million in the sector of electricity, gas and water. When looking at these figures it
must be borne in mind that current austerity and ongoing trends towards staff reductions in the
many public services will mean that at least some of these individuals will not be replaced.
13
Source: Information provided by CGIL (Confederazione Generale Italiana del Lavoro) representative
20% 22% 24% 26% 28% 30% 32% 34% 36% 38% 40%
Scientific research and development
All economic sectors
Waste collection, treatment and disposal activities; materials …
Social work activities without accommodation
Electricity, gas, steam and air conditioning supply
Residential care activities
Postal and courier activities
Human health activities
Public administration and defence; compulsory social security
Public Services (selected sectors)
Education
Libraries, archives, museums and other cultural activities
19
Experts’ report
Figure 3.10 Forecasted job openings during the period 2010-2020 by sectors, in the EU-27 and Norway, in thousands
Source: Cedefop (IER estimates). Note: the sectors of Public Services for which data is available
do not cover the entire range of Services of General Interest.
In the health sector, the ageing of the workforce has been identified at the EU level as a major
issue for years and the workforce has even already started to shrink due to the retirement of many
health professionals. According to data collected from Germany, Denmark, Ireland, France,
Sweden and the UK reported in the Commission Staff Working Document on an Action Plan for the
EU Health Workforce, the average age of nurses is between 41-45 years; in 2009, about 30% of all
doctors in the EU were over 55 years of age and by 2020, more than 60 000 doctors are expected
to retire annually (European Commission, 2012 a).
Ageing and losses of qualified staff are also identified as a key challenge in the rail sector.
According to the results of a survey of social partners in the rail sector, across the EU about 34% of
employees are already past the age of 50 and demographic shifts have already affected the
recruitment of staff or will do so in the future (EVA, 2011).
Are there any studies/forecasts available on the volume of jobs left vacant due to retirement in
Public Services or some sectors of Public Services in your country? How many of these posts will
remain unfilled to achieve downsizing?
3.2.2 Young recruits could help filling the gap and meeting changing skills demand
Even if not all older employees leaving for retirement are replaced, recruitment of new (young) staff
will be necessary to compensate for the loss of workers. Indeed, transfers of staff from other
economic sectors outside Public Services and/or countries are not always a possible and/or
desirable solution. For example, strong tensions for recruitment are particularly noticeable in the
healthcare sector, as chronic skills shortages are experienced and recruitment of qualified doctors
and nurses has gone beyond boundaries, raising some questions about the ‘ethical international
recruitment’ of health care workers.
In addition, the recruitment of younger staff could not only alleviate labour shortages but also
addresses any skills mismatches already identified across different sectors in the Public Services
by bringing new skills and competences. Indeed, changing and emerging skills needs have been
identified in various sectors as the nature of work is changing and (older) employees face new
demands for improved service delivery, using new technologies and management practices that
tend to add intensity and complexity to their work (CEEP, 2010):
■ In the education sector, teachers have to keep pace with changing technology, its impact on
learning methods and changing pupil profiles;
■ In the health sector, ‘e-skills’ are emerging as a new key competence for managers, medical
doctors and health associate professionals, as well as nurses due to the increasing role of ICT,
both for diagnostics as well as contact with patients via e-mail or the use of electronic patient
dossiers. For all these occupations, updating ICT skills will essential to keep up with the rapidly
growing technological innovations (European Commission, 2009).
■ In central, local and regional administration, new demands for ICT skills emerge from the
implementation of e-government initiatives.
-1000 1000 3000 5000 7000 9000
Electricity, gas and water
Public administration and defence
Education
Health and social work
Expansion demand Replacement demand (staff leaving for retirement)
20
Experts’ report
■ In the electricity sector, despite a large number of jobs have either disappeared or been
outsourced, jobs have been created at both ends of the skill spectrum including call centres,
customer service specialists, brokerage, business development, project managers, legal
services and new product development.
■ In the rail sector, skill changes include eco-driving, foreign languages, customer orientation,
sales and logistics; skills shortages have been identified in the areas of logistics, IT and
environment engineering.
Is there any evidence from your sector on changing skills needs and skills shortages and how
young people could help address these? Are any actions being taken by social partners in these
sectors to specifically address these skills shortages?
3.2.3 However, important obstacles to youth employment in Public Services remain
Too few concrete actions has been taken to address staffing challenges and increasing
youth representation in Public Services
According to the evidence collected for this project, prior to the crisis, the promotion of youth
employment in Public Services was typically not considered as a central point of debate (with some
exceptions, as will be evidenced in the sections below) or the object of a specific strategy at the
national level. A key question is why the challenges of ageing in public services still not treated as
a top priority, despite the increasing awareness of the importance of the demographic challenge.
Looking at some of the sectors of Public Services ageing most quickly, such as public
administration and education, long-term anticipatory approaches concerning staffing and age
management remain too rare or insufficiently developed:
■ In the sector of public administration, age management ‘has emerged in the 1990s but has
remained something of a back-room technical issue to be discussed amongst an inner circle of
consultants and managers, but with little broader public exposure’ (Mc Kinnon, 2010). As such,
ageing and staffing challenges have not been a key driver behind major reforms affecting the
sector, while debates have been largely dominated by fiscal constraints and more generally
requirements for ‘doing more with less’ and improving the cost-efficiency of services. Therefore,
little evidence is available on actions undertaken by governments at various levels to cope with
the challenge of staff ageing.
■ In the education sector, evidence from recent surveys of social partners carried out at the EU
level suggest that current policies and practices to recruit and retain teachers in the long-term
are not considered adequate, and that social partners are not systematically involved in the
development of such policies (ETUCE, 2012 a).
There is some evidence that market liberalisation and constrained budget in public services, even
in the years pre-dating the crisis, has led many employers in the public services to be required to
implement recruitment freezes, which have left then with a very skewed age profile, without being
able to effectively address this issue (ICF GHK, 2012 c).
Is there any evidence from your sector on the level of awareness of the staffing challenges in
Public Services?
In some sectors of Public Services, austerity measures have drastically limited job
opportunities for youth
Fostering employment in Public Services has not been one of the key priorities followed by
governments to support youth employment in the context of the recession. According to a recent
research project carried out for EPSU by the Working Lives Research Institute, ‘few of the
initiatives aimed at youth are expressed through public employment (and none exclusively so)’
(Working Lives Research Institute, 2011). Indeed, existing reviews of youth policies measures
suggest that there has been very little explicit emphasis on recruiting or retaining youth in Public
Services, which has been confirmed by the stakeholders consulted as part of this project.
21
Experts’ report
Indeed, counter-cyclical approaches strengthening Public Services and the State as an employer
have not been favoured in Europe in the context of austerity policies. As the priority in many
countries is placed on containing public expenditure and reducing public deficit, opportunities for
recruitment of new (young) staff have been drastically reduced or closed due to ‘job freezes’ in
some sectors, often further exacerbating medium term trends towards staff reductions. It is
important to note, however, that the picture not only diverges across countries but also across
different the sectors composing Public Services and indeed across companies and organisation,
reflecting very different contexts. Some employers in Public Services are currently clearly reducing
or freezing recruitment while others, particular in network services, are less affected by austerity
measures and still offer job opportunities to young people, due to strong replacement needs, for
instance in the energy sector. It must be noted that even in these sectors in many countries this
follows years of limited recruitment as services are liberalised and have shed many employees.
Among the sectors most affected are (central) public administrations. Recruitment in competitive
exams has been stopped or drastically reduced, which contributes to the dramatic reduction of job
opportunities for new labour market entrants. According to a review carried out by the OECD,
personnel cuts have taken place in central governments in Ireland, Czech Republic, Netherlands,
Poland, Portugal and the UK. Limited replacement rates for retiring staff and recruitment freezes
are taking place in Spain, Greece, Italy, Austria, France, Slovakia and the UK. In addition, the
reallocation and restructuring of personnel to decrease staffing costs is taking place in various
countries in Denmark Estonia, Finland, France and Slovenia (OECD, 2011).
In the sample of countries covered by this study, Southern European countries are particularly
affected by public expenditure cuts. In Spain, due to recent austerity measures, recruitment in the
public administration has been frozen except for some departments. In Greece, only one out of ten
civil servants leaving for retirement is currently replaced14
.
In Italy, due to the effects of recruitment freezes over several years, young people with open-ended
contracts are particularly underrepresented in central and local public administrations as well as in
the health sector. According to national data, the number of young people in permanent positions in
such sectors has been halved in the last ten years. In addition, even young people who have
successfully passed a competition to enter one of these sectors cannot be recruited15
.
Budget constraints also affect the volume of temporary contracts used in Public Services as some
of these are not renewed due to austerity measures. In Cyprus for example, less temporary
contracts - which used to be considered as entry point for young people in Public Services – are
now offered.
Which sectors are the most affected by austerity measures in terms of lay-offs/non-renewal of
temporary contracts or recruitment freezes in your country? Which sectors are most likely to recruit
again to counteract demographic trends? Is there any data on these aspects?
Staffing challenges cannot be dissociated from general factors affecting the attractiveness
of careers in Public Services
In the current economic context and scarcity of job vacancies, jobs in Public Services could overall
still be considered attractive for young people, especially when these are still associated with stable
career prospects. However, all sectors in Public Services are not equally attractive, and some
sectors fail to attract young candidates. This can be due to the nature of work in Public Services,
the working conditions and wages, the prestige associated to the position/sector and well as
existing practices in terms of recruitment in Public Services. The overall attractiveness of Public
Services is very difficult to measure and varies a great deal among countries and sectors, as well
as among professions within a given sector, and indeed on individual perceptions.
Across Europe, one of the sectors which is struggling to attract enough (young) candidates to fill
available posts is the healthcare sector. Evidence from various countries suggests that not enough
14
Source: Information gathered from participants during the seminar in Athens organised as part of this research project. 15
Source: Information provided by CGIL (Confederazione Generale Italiana del Lavoro) representative
22
Experts’ report
trained young people in the field of health are coming through the education system to replace
those who leave for retirement. For example, in Italy, while 13,400 nurses were due to retire in
2010, only 8,500 nurses graduated in 2008-2009. Recent studies highlight that many European
countries are facing serious difficulties in training sufficient number of graduates and unfilled
specialist training places are reported16
. According to European Commission estimates, there could
be a shortfall of around one million healthcare workers by 2020 (up to two million, if including long
term care and ancillary professionals) if no measures are taken to address these challenges.
In some countries, recruitment difficulties are also experienced in the education sector. According
to the results of a Europe-wide survey of social partners in education, the recruitment of teachers
has been considered more difficult since 2008 in some countries as a result of lack of applicants
with the right profile. While most of recruitment difficulties are specific to some teaching specialities
(especially maths, science and language), general concerns reported are the lack of attractiveness
and prestige of the profession, for instance in Lithuania and Romania (ETUCE, 2012 b). In general,
difficulties for attracting new teachers are attributed to low salaries, limited opportunities for career
development and training and to the perceived low status of the profession (ETUCE 2012 a).
The image and status of work in Services of General Interest is also very dependent on specific
factors linked to national context, e.g. the perception of the status of civil servants in society and
their working conditions. For example, in Bulgaria, some sectors of Public Services which are
considered attractive for youth are the electricity sector, telecommunications and activities linked to
environment protection. These sectors indeed offers stable job prospects for highly skilled workers,
with good wages and benefit packages, more advantageous than for civil servants working for
public administration and education. Professions in the field of social services, where there is a
greater competition between providers, are also considered less attractive as wages are lower and
many workers are offered temporary contracts17
.
Furthermore, geographical mismatches can also explain in part some of the recruitment difficulties
to recruit in Public Services, including in the education sector (ETUCE 2012 b). In Bulgaria, it is
reported that due to the migration of large numbers of young people to urban areas, employers in
Public services in smaller towns and rural areas can face challenges to find appropriate candidates
with the required levels of qualification18
.
Is there any evidence in your country of Public Services struggling to attract young candidates?
What are the underlying reasons?
Recruitment difficulties specific to some sectors of Public Services also need to be tackled
In addition, some obstacles to recruitment in Public Services are not only linked to the lack of
(young) applicants with the right profile but also to existing recruitment procedures, especially
linked to the specific status of ‘career civil servants’. In Public Services, recruitment into permanent
positions is a typically a selective process based on principles of merit. When recruitment is based
on competitive exams instead of ‘appointment based’, it is in practice more difficult for (very) young
people to ‘get in’ and entry into a career in Public Services typically takes place beyond the age of
30. In countries where only few competitions have been organised over the past years due to
recruitment freezes while workers have been recruited temporary contracts, young people are even
less likely to access a job due to the very high level of competition between applicants.
Specific recruitment procedures in Public Services also limit the value of apprenticeship training as
a way to plan the transfer of competence from an ageing workforce and future recruitments. For
example, in France, since 1992, apprenticeship training can take place in the civil service ( central
public administration, local public administration and public hospitals) but apprentices who have
successfully completed their training cannot be directly recruited unless they pass an open
16
See for example research of the WHO’s European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies quoted in Commission
Staff Working Document on an Action Plan for the EU Health Workforce, SWD (2012) 93 final 17
Source: Information provided by CITUB representative (Confederation of Independent Trade Unions in Bulgaria) 18
Source: Information provided by CITUB representative (Confederation of Independent Trade Unions in Bulgaria)
23
Experts’ report
competition, exception made of direct recruitments at the lowest grade of civil service (Henard,
2009). This situation is clearly discouraging for apprentices and can explain why in practice the
number of apprentices in these sectors remains very limited; in total 8.400 young people had
started an apprenticeship in 2010 (DARES, 2011).
Are there any other obstacles for promoting youth employment linked to the specific recruitment
produced applied in Public Services in your country?
Young workers are underrepresented in representative bodies and in trade union
membership
Both across Public Services and the economy as a whole, young workers are traditionally much
less unionised than adults, although in some countries apprentices can also join trade unions (for
example in Denmark). Many young people are not well aware of activities of trade unions or do not
feel identified with these. Young employees under (short-term) temporary contracts are much less
likely to actively engage in the defence of their interests, due to their precarious status. In some of
the sectors strongly affected by the recession however, it seems that the deterioration of
employment prospects has led more young people to become interested in joining labour
organisations. For instance, is reported that in Italy, the number of young teachers joining the trade
unions UIL Scuola and FLC-CGIL has been on the rise since 200819
.
Which are the obstacles for increasing the visibility of young people in representative bodies in your
company? Are there noticeable trends concerning trade union membership among young workers?
19
http://etuce.homestead.com/Crisis/country_features/Featuring_model_Italy_eng.pdf
24
Experts’ report
4 Fostering youth employment in Public Services: a review of initiatives and practices across Europe
This chapter presents information on selected examples of initiatives of relevance for the promotion
of youth employment in Public Services:
■ Examples of good practice at the enterprise or organisation level which underline the
commitment of employers in the Public Services to provide training and employment
opportunities for young people, also in the context of an increasing awareness of the impact of
demographic change on future skills and labour shortages.
■ Sectoral agreements linked to the improvement of youth employment in Public Services or
focusing on the provision of apprenticeships, internships/traineeships, work placement and
work contracts for young people.
■ Relevant national and regional policy policies and programmes.
Most of the examples presented in this section have been identified through interviews with
representatives of trade unions and employers and other stakeholders from Bulgaria, Denmark,
France, Germany, Greece, Italy, the Netherlands and Spain; in addition, some other initiatives has
been identified by means of desk research. Some of these examples will be presented during the
conference in Brussels.
4.1 Anticipating long-term recruitment needs in Public Services
Although recruitment of new staff is currently limited in some Public Services, the evolution of the
age pyramid and forthcoming waves of retirement will imply that recruitments will be needed
sooner or later. Attracting and retaining young workers is therefore set to become a prime
challenge for many Public Services in Europe, raising questions and needs for new approaches in
terms of recruitment and career development of new employees.
Public Services need to put in place anticipatory approaches in human resource management,
looking beyond the short-term budgetary constraints, and address specific issues linked to the
staffing challenges in their sectors.
Box 4.1 The Programme ‘Better Working in the Public Administration’ of the Ministry of the Interior and Kingdom Relations, Netherlands
In the Netherlands, it is difficult for young people to find a stable job in the central public administration,
although the recruitment of civil servants is ‘position-based’ and not based on competitive exams. The
average age in the central administration is quickly increasing - by 2020, 60% of current staff in the
government is expected to reach pensionable age. Although it is expected that not all employees leaving for
retirement will be replaced due to current recruitment freezes, a significant number of job openings should be
offered after 2020.
The programme ‘Better Working in the Public Administration’ aims to address the challenge of how to keep
young people at work in government and to get young people working in the sector in a few years. Agenda-
setting is a critical dimension of the project - the programme aims to challenge the working culture of public
administrations and to position the topic on the political agenda. The programme also involves negotiations
with trade unions representing civil servants.
In addition to support policy development, the programme supports pilot projects in cooperation with
organisations in the public sector (ministries, provinces and municipalities), such as the setting up of a cross-
disciplinary young talent pool of civil servants, an alumni network (to be able to get in touch with and attract
former young employees from the public sector at the time when job opportunities eventually arise) and the
support to public administration ‘ambassadors’ visiting upper secondary schools and giving presentations in
order to raise interest in government jobs among young people.
25
Experts’ report
How common are these approaches in your country? Can good examples be found and if so, in
which sectors?
4.2 Raising the profile of Public Services as employers
Various sectors or individual employers in Public Services organise outreach activities and
campaigns to recruit young employees and more generally to promote the image and
attractiveness of their sector among young people and graduates.
Education
■ In Germany, campaigns are being organised in the federal government in cooperation with
social partners with a view to raise the image of the teaching profession.
■ In France, the communication campaign ‘Ambition enseigner’ (Ambition to teach) has been
launched in December 2012 by the Ministry of National Education. The campaign aims to
promote the teaching profession at a time when large numbers of teaching posts will be
opened for recruitment. It is foreseen that 40,000 new teachers will be recruited via open
competitions during 2013 and 2014 (140.000 recruitments are planned in the next five years).
The main focus of the communication campaign and related website, which targets the general
public, is to promote the image of teaching as a profession, to relay information on the current
competitions and recruitment opportunities and inform on the changes in teacher initial training.
Public administration and defence
■ In Hungary, ‘RE-generáció’ is an initiative of the government started in 2010 that advertises
public administration jobs among recent graduates. It involves annual job fairs, summer camps
(with seminars) and maintains an information blog (http://regeneracio.blog.hu/).
■ In Bulgaria, the military has been particularly active at developing pro-active approaches to
attract and hire young people. The Ministry of Defence organises job fairs together with the
Employment Agency every year in various location across the country, which give the
opportunity for applicants to do interviews on the spot20
.
Transport
■ In Belgium, the National Railway Company NMBS/SNCB uses radio, street and web
advertising as well as a website to promote employment possibilities in various positions mostly
related to the maintenance of the railway infrastructure.
■ In Germany, Deutsche Bahn, the German railway company has cooperation schemes with
schools across the country to promote the company and the various types of positions it offers.
Deutsche Bahn also has been working on improving its image among young people through
adds in the press, job fairs, social media, its website or via cooperation with schools and
universities and public employment services.
■ In France, the state-owned railway company SNCF organises every year special events to
reach students and graduates - for examples in schools - to provide information about the
company and the employment and training opportunities it offers and also provides information
on recruitment and training opportunities on its website.
■ In Sweden, the members of the Swedish Transport Administration and the Swedish Association
of Train Operating Companies had started since 2007 an initiative to promote the image of the
sector in society as well as developing efficient educational system to train future employees in
the railway sector, as there is a high level of competition for young people with specific
technical skills. A website has been set up to provide information for young people on available
job opportunities as well as education and training opportunities (EVA, 2011).
20
Source: Information provided by CITUB (Confederation of Independent Trade Unions in Bulgaria) representative
26
Experts’ report
■ In France, Air Emploi, an association created by Air France and other employers in the sectors
of air transport aims to anticipate recruitment needs, raise vocations and improve the image of
the sector among young people (see Box 4.2).
Box 4.2 AirEmploi: supporting vocations in the air transport sector in France
In France, the air transport sector, which currently employs over 115.000 persons, generally benefits from a
positive image, but too often young people perceive the type of job positions offered in the sector are
exclusively high qualified and male. To ensure that appropriate information on air transport professions is
available, the association Airemploi was created in 1999 as a join initiative from the Air France group and
federations of employers in the sector of air transport (FNAM, Fédération Nationale de l’Aviation Marchande)
and aeronautics (GIFAS, Groupement des Industries Françaises Aéronautiques et Spatiales), in partnership
with the French Air Force army and Aéroports de Paris.
The activities of Airemploi target any person potentially interested in a career in air transport (and
aeronautics), from school pupils to tertiary students, employees and job seekers, as well as professionals that
can provide them with orientation and guidance services. Airemploi uses various channels to provide
information and guidance:
■ Its website (http://www.airemploi.org) provides information on activities of employers in the sector,
different types of jobs available and required qualifications and skills and relevant resources (orientation
test, description of occupations, useful links, etc.).
■ Counsellors from Airemploi are also involved in proactive approaches to raise vocations among young
people. Airemploi participate in job fairs and also intervenes at an early stage by providing collective
information sessions and conferences to young people at the lower and upper secondary level, working in
partnership with local stakeholders, schools and teachers. Strategies used to attract the interest of young
people including short presentations, videos and multimedia tools such as ‘serious games’. Through
these activities, one of its objectives is to reach out some groups that are less likely to consider a career
in air transport, such as girls.
■ Airemploi offers tailored individual guidance and advice to help young people interested in a career in air
transport to build their professional project and/or find an apprenticeship placement in the sector; this
support can be provided over the phone, during face-to-face meetings or as part of collective information
sessions.
■ Airemploi also refers young people to other services and stakeholders (e.g. training institutions and public
employment services) if appropriate and provides specific information sessions on careers in air transport
to vocational advisors, teachers, etc.
Are there similar initiatives trying to promote the image of individual Public Services employers in
your country, or initiatives at the sectoral level?
4.3 Using apprenticeships and work placements to train and retain talent
Apprenticeship-type training is already used by various employers across Public Services as a
strategy to secure qualified staff, especially in professions where shortages are already felt and/or
anticipated, and address the impact of demographic change. Apprenticeships offer some key
advantages as it allows potential new recruits to acquire specific know-how and practical skills.
Public administration
■ In Bulgaria, the programme ‘Start a career’ provides opportunities to unemployed graduates to
gain work experience in public administration (at the national and local level) in order to
facilitate their transition to employment. Young people apply for vacancies according to their
degree and after a selection procedure young people start their appointment for a period of
nine months. Payment and social contributions are paid by the State. After the completion of
the placement nearly two thirds of young people are employed in permanent positions.
Energy
27
Experts’ report
■ In Hungary, E.ON Földgáz (a gas company) has introduced a scholarship programme aiming to
remedy the difficulty of attracting and recruiting young engineers into the company. The
programme was introduced in 2008 as a part of a longer‐term strategic approach to planning
and managing the workforce in the company. It is aimed at third year students of the
universities preparing gas engineers. Through the scholarship programme the company also
wants to improve its brand image and to become the employer of choice for university students.
The scholarship is also a way for the company to ensure a continuous talent pool by
strengthening its ties with universities and establishing on-going relationships with talented
young people. Information about the scholarship is distributed through universities and an open
day introduces students to the programme. The nine‐month scholarship programme provides
an induction to the company, a mentoring scheme, professional and skills training, and
opportunities to develop a university thesis. At the end of the programme, the best students are
offered jobs in the company21
.
Transport
■ In Bulgaria, the National Railway Infrastructure Company (NRIC) has developed different types
of placement programmes since 2008 as part of its ‘policy to attract young people’, launched in
response to the ageing of its workforce and to identified difficulties in filling vacancies for
specialized engineering staff. Three programmes give access to on-the-job training at different
levels: the ‘Young specialists appointment programme’ is designed for young graduates and
offers a six-month temporary contract (with a possibility of conversion into a permanent
contract), the traineeship programme (one to three months during the summer period) targets
students and the scholarship programme targets for students in their final year of studies (EVA,
2011).
■ In France, the state-owned railway company SNCF offers a large number of apprenticeships
positions per year (3000 positions including 750 for higher education graduates) in a wide
range of qualifications are available. Students acquire a vocational qualification at the end of
their training.
■ In Germany, various employers in use ‘the dual training’ as the main strategy to recruit new
qualified staff (see Box 4.3), i.e. the number of apprenticeships placements offered is set to
meet internal demand.
Box 4.3 Examples of practical implementation of dual training in three German companies: Deutsche Bahn, Bogestra and Rheinergie
In the German vocational ‘dual training’ system, apprenticeships last from 2 to 3.5 years and are regulated by
a contract. Apprentices need to take a final exam in order to receive their diploma.
The Deutsche Bahn group (DB), whose core business is rail, employs around 200,000 employees in
Germany. As part of its proactive approach towards recruitment, the dual training system or apprenticeship
training is the basis of securing junior employees for DB at different levels22
. The enterprise trains about
8,700 apprentices (3000 new apprentices per year) spread across 25 occupations in the field of transport,
technology, commerce and IT. Apprenticeship is a well anchored tradition in the company and about 95% of
apprentices who have successfully completed their training are eventually recruited. At DB, in addition to the
‘standard’ dual training (combination of in-company training and training in vocational school), expert training
is provided to apprentices by DB training department. At DB, there is an important focus on social
competences and methodological capacities to foster the personal development of apprentices. Teamwork,
self-reflection and responsibility are also a central component of training.
21
http://www.epsu.org/IMG/pdf/TOOLKIT_gas_sector_final_15.10.09.pdf 22
http://www.deutschebahn.com/site/nachhaltigkeitsbericht__2009/en/our__employees/qualification/securing__junior__staff/training/training.html
28
Experts’ report
A similar strategy is used in Bogestra, a public transport operator located in the Ruhr area, employing over
2,200 workers. Continuous needs for recruitment in the company are mainly met by integrating young people
through apprenticeships, which are positively valued as an efficient system to transfer skills from more
experienced employees to newcomers. In 2011, Bogestra trained 105 apprentices in a variety of profiles
according to the company’s needs including for example administrative clerks, IT specialists and industrial
mechanics (about 35 new apprentices per year). Bogestra also uses on-the-job training to address the
anticipate shortage of engineers and trains young people for this type of profiles for instance mechatronics
engineers, through a combination of vocational training and university degree. To attract more young people
to engage in vocational training at Bogestra, the company has launched a major advertising campaign in
2012. Among other things, the newly created website www.bogestra-durchstarter.de informs students,
teachers and parents about various training opportunities.
Rheinenergie, an energy provider majority owned by the City of Cologne works in partnership with a number
of local schools and a local university to attract potential future apprentices. This is considered important not
only to prevent future skill shortages, but also to market the company as a good employer, as the energy
sector is not considered to have a particularly good reputation. Rheinenergie provides about new 35
apprenticeship places per year. A collective agreement is in place which essentially requires the employer to
retain most if not all its successful apprentices. This is one of the reasons why the company does not train
more young people than it can reasonably predict will be required in three years’ time.
Sectoral collective agreements can also to encourage and regulate apprenticeship training.
■ In the UK, a framework agreement on apprenticeships in the government sector (civil service)
has been drawn up in 2010 by the Cabinet Office, Government Skills and the Council of Civil
Service Unions, with a view to develop the skills of local young people and growing the future
workforce to anticipate recruitments. The agreement foresees that departments and agencies
will determine the total number of apprenticeships needed including ‘internal’ apprenticeships
used as means to upskilling and developing members of staff and as part of the recruitment
offer; when apprentices are new recruits, they must be appointed to undertake a real job in a
substantive role. The agreement also includes provisions concentring the quality of training,
qualifications and support provided to apprentices and the involvement for trade unions in the
development of apprenticeship training.
■ In Italy, the use of apprenticeship training was regulated by the latest national collective
agreement of social cooperatives (see Box 4.4).
Box 4.4 Italy – Regulating apprenticeship training in social cooperatives
In Italy, social cooperatives carry out various activities linked to Services of General Interests such as youth
community centres and information/guidance services, day centres for different types of groups (e.g. drug
addicts, people with a handicap, the elderly, etc.), residential homes, home care services, etc. The majority of
social cooperatives that operate in the sector of health, education and welfare are governed by a national
collective agreement (CCNL). As this sector is characterized by a strong presence of youth and there is
therefore a large potential for the development of apprenticeship training (leading to a recognised vocational
qualification) in social cooperatives.
As part of the last renewal of this national collective agreement, the use of apprenticeship training of social
cooperatives was regulated23
. The current national collective agreement clearly sets the procedures and the
parties involved and the type of profiles covered. Apprenticeship contracts are aimed at young people aged
between 18 and 29 years. For each professional profile available, the duration and content and methods of
training leading to the acquisition of technical and vocational skills and a recognized qualification have been
defined. The use of apprenticeships is now better controlled due to a series of criteria:
■ Apprenticeships are submitted to a contract and paid
■ The duration of the apprenticeships contract varies depending on the professional profile (from 18 to 36
months)
23
Source: Information provided by CGIL (Confederazione Generale Italiana del Lavoro) representative
29
Experts’ report
■ The number of apprentices may not exceed 80% of qualified workers in service
■ Cooperatives who have not kept at least 70% of young people who had completed their apprenticeship in
the previous 24 months cannot hire more apprentices.
Are there similar initiatives in your country and in which sectors? Are there examples of use
collective bargaining to promote apprenticeship-type training in Public Services?
4.4 Offering opportunities for quality training at the workplace
The provision of quality training opportunities for young people is particularly important in those
countries where there is still a limited tradition of work-based learning and school-to-work
transitions are particularly difficult. In the context of the recession, employers in Public Services can
also play a role with regards to the provision of training opportunities for young people, even if they
have no or few job vacancies to offer in the short-term due to recruitment freezes.
■ In the Greek labour market, work experience in Public Services acquired during an
apprenticeship is highly valued by employers. The dual apprenticeship system promoted by the
Greek Public Employment Service (Manpower Employment Organization, OAED) combines
classroom training in Apprenticeship schools (Epagelmatiki Sholi, EPAS Mathiteias) and work
placements ,which can take place either in Public Services or in the private sector. In Public
Services, apprenticeships can take place in hospitals (where there is significant demand for
apprentices assistant nurses), municipal kindergartens (for infant care nursing assistants),
municipalities and military services (offering apprenticeship places in several technical
specialties, such as plumbers, air condition technicians, electronic system technicians etc.).The
target group for apprenticeship training is young people aged 16-23 years who have graduated
from the first grade of upper secondary school (lyceum). Apprenticeship lasts two years and
apprentices receive wages set at 70% of the minimum wage.
■ In Italy, the quality of the traineeships in Public Services is considered as an important issue.
The region of Tuscany has launched a comprehensive programme for young people aiming,
among other objectives, at supporting the use of paid training placements including in Public
Services (see Box 4.5).
Box 4.5 The Giovanisì programme, Tuscany (Italy): supporting quality traineeships, including in Public Services
In Tuscany, employment prospects for young people have deteriorated over the last years although they
remain slightly better than in the rest of Italy. The regional government of Tuscany has launched the project
‘Giovanisì’ (2011-2015) co-funded by the ESF in to create opportunities for social mobility, personal and
professional development of young people and to focus on youth.
The programme, among other objectives, supports regional policy initiatives promoting quality traineeships.
Indeed, Tuscany has recently approved a regional law regulating extra-curricular traineeships (i.e. outside an
education course or degree), according to which employers have provide trainees with a minimum monthly
allowance of 500€, with a view to limit the abusive use of trainees as cheap labour24
. The Giovanisì
programme supports this objective by co-funding the mandatory allowance paid to trainees; for young people
aged 18-30 such co-funding amounts to EUR 300. In addition, Tuscany has signed agreements with regional
24
Legge n.3 ‘Modifiche alla Legge Regionale n.32 del 26 luglio (Testo Unico della normativa della
Regione Toscana in materia di educazione, istruzione, orientamento, formazione professionale e
lavoro) in materia di tirocini’. In addition, new developments foreseen at the regional level with a
view to promote apprenticeships training (as of 1st February 2013, Tuscany will launch a new call
for proposals for compulsory and not compulsory apprenticeships, offering placements in public
administration and in other sectors of public services which are a regional competence (such as
health).
30
Experts’ report
bodies and institutions with regard to encourage the provision of traineeships in Public Services.
In less than a year, with the support of the programme about 125 young Tuscans have already started to
carry a paid internship in a local public administration (city councils and provincial administration), publicly
owned company or university, the vast majority of them in city councils.
Is the promotion of quality training also a key issue in your country tackled by specific measures
and programmes? Are there any examples of employers offering training opportunities to young
people, even if they cannot offer permanent job positions to trainees/apprentices or beyond their
recruitment capacities?
4.5 Helping disadvantaged young people to access quality vocational training opportunities
A sustainable and fair recruitment and training policy in Public Services cannot only focus on
attracting the best school performers - pro-active interventions from employers are needed to
broaden access to training opportunities to a wider pool of applicants. In addition to fulfilling social
responsibility objectives, such strategies can also directly benefit Public Services employers as it
widens the potential pool of skills from which they draw.
Opening up access to training opportunities is a particular challenge in a country such as Germany
with a relatively selective apprenticeship system due to high level of requirements in regulated
vocational training and the limited number of apprenticeship placements available. As a result,
young people with low academic results may be excluded from the opportunity to engage in
vocational training. Various companies in the sector of Public Services have acknowledged this
issue and have engaged in measures to prepare young people for entry into apprenticeships
training, either offering support during secondary school (see Box 4.6) or as part of ‘bridging’ pre-
vocational programmes (see Box 4.7).
Box 4.6 Encouraging secondary school students to train in Public Services: examples form the ‘ Berlin needs you’ project and from Bogestra
‘Berlin needs you’ (Berlin braucht dich) is a joint initiative of the Berlin Vocational Training Network for
Immigrants (BQN25) and the government of the Land of Berlin implemented by various companies including
the city’s largest public-services companies: Berliner Wasserbetriebe (water and sewage), Berliner
Stadtreinigung (cleaning and environmental services), Berliner Verkehrsbetriebe (public transport) and
Vivantes (healthcare) and covers twelve occupational areas.
The aim of the imitative is to motivate secondary school students from diverse backgrounds to train in Public
Services, in order to raise to 25% the proportion of trainees in Public Services who come from an immigrant
background. The activities target secondary school students: in Class 7, information about careers in the
participating companies is provided; during the three following years, students are given an opportunity to
engage in short-term placements to have a first practical experience on the world of work and, during the
final year, also receive assistance in applying for apprenticeship training. The programme started in 2006,
and by 2009 the number of young people from immigrant backgrounds engaged in training in Public
Services had doubled (CEEP/Cambridge Econometrics, 2013).
Bogestra, a transport company in the Ruhr area, has started the internship programme ‘Starting vocational
training’ in 2010 in co-operation with secondary schools (Hauptschulen) in order to facilitate the access to
dual vocational training for applicants with a lower educational degree. This programme targets 10th-grade
students and includes a one-year internship as ‘specialist on vehicle operation’. The internship takes place
25
Berufliches Qualifiziungsnetzwerk für Migrantinnen und Migranten in Berlin
http://www.bqn-berlin.de/index.php
31
Experts’ report
one day per week to help young people get a sense of how work is carried out in the company. In addition,
young participants are thoroughly prepared for the selection process for apprenticeship training, which
involves an entrance exam and a job interview.
Box 4.7 Company pre-vocational training programmes: examples from Deutsche Bahn and
Rheinenergie
In Germany, the railway company Deutsche Bahn and the energy provider Rheinergie are two examples of
companies that rely on apprenticeship training to fulfil their recruitment needs (see Box 4.3) and have also
developed initiatives to train disadvantaged young people who do not qualify to enter such form or training or
face obstacles to find apprenticeship placements on the open market. Such pre-vocational programmes
typically last one year and can be followed by a standard apprenticeship.
The Deutsche Bahn has developed a company-specific programme called ‘Chance +’. About 200 young
people enrol in Chance + every year and get an opportunity to acquire job experience in the company for a
period lasting up to eleven months. Youth workers/educators supervise the participants and fully integrate
them into the operational processes of the company. A certificate form the Chamber of Commerce documents
their successful participation; participants can then continue their training via a standard apprenticeship.
Similarly, Rheinenergie makes a conscious effort to offer training opportunities to school leavers with different
levels of school leaving certificates. In addition to ‘standard’ apprenticeship placements, it offers
approximately 10 placements for so called entry level training qualifications (Einstiegsqualifizierung) for young
people. The trainees pursue a 12 months training programme in the company and around 50% of these are
later retained as apprentices. Beneficiaries of this measure are mediated to the company via the Public
Employment Services.
Are there any similar examples of good practice in place in your country at the company or sectoral
level?
4.6 Promoting the inclusion of disadvantaged youth via subsidised contracts
Employers in Public Services must also play their part in offering job opportunities for all young
people and contribute to youth inclusion. In a times of recession and austerity where some groups
of young people are particularly vulnerable are at a risk of marginalisation, Public Services have a
role to play in supporting young people to make their first steps into the labour markets. This
requires a commitment to trust young people, especially those facing barriers to employment.
A few examples of programmes with a nation-wide coverage relying offering subsidised work
contracts in Public Services can be found:
■ In Bulgaria, municipalities and municipal entities offer subsidized jobs for young people and
people from other vulnerable groups in the labour market. Some of these activities are
financed by European Social Fund programmes for the activation of (young) jobseekers and
include the completion of vocational training. One of the largest and oldest programmes at the
local level is the programme ‘From Social Assistance to Employment’ which has been
implemented for more than 12 years. The programme offers opportunities to young people,
especially those on social benefits, to gain work experience in municipalities and municipal
enterprises in the field of environmental protection, health, military clubs, libraries, schools, and
public transport, water and sewerage companies.
■ In France, a new type of subsidised contract for young people in sectors providing services of
general interest (or in profit sectors which present a large potential in terms of job creation) has
been introduced by the government at the end of 2012 (see Box 4.8).This schemes is based on
a substantial financial effort from the State to help young people
Box 4.8 Subsidised jobs in sectors offering services of general interest in France - Emplois d’avenir
32
Experts’ report
The ‘emplois d’avenir’ (‘jobs with a future’) is a new measure launched in 2012 in France to boost youth
employment in sectors who have offers services of general interest (or exceptionally in sectors that
present a large potential in terms of job creation). Emplois d’avenir are subsidised work contracts
regulated in the Labour Code (amended by the law of 26 October 2012) targeting young people aged 16
to 25 without any qualification, or young people who have at most a vocational diploma and have been
looking for a job for 6 months over the last 12 months. Young people from disadvantaged urban areas and
less developed rural areas are targeted in priority by the scheme; in these areas, the scheme also targets
long-term unemployed young people with higher qualifications.
A wide range of employers across Public Services such as local public administrations, hospitals, public
institutions and State-owned companies such as the railway company SNCF) can offer emplois d’avenir.
In this case, the State subsidy will amount to 75% of the minimum salary, the rest being paid by the
employer, which also has the obligation to provide training and individual tutoring to the young person
recruited. The development of the scheme, matching of candidates with employers and the follow-up of
participants has been put under the responsibility of local structures for youth insertion (Mission locales)
and public employment services (mission locales).
The official objective stated by the government is to create 150,000 emplois d’avenir in total - in both profit
and non-profit sectors in 2013 and 2014. The annual cost of the measure is estimated at EUR 500 million
in 2013, and EUR 1.5 billion per year once the scheme has reached its full capacity26
.
Subsidised work contracts can also be promoted at the company level. For example, in France,
the enterprise Triselec Lille, specialised in collecting and sorting waste, regularly recruit low-skilled
young people facing obstacles to enter the labour market under subsidised work contracts ;
subsidies received by the enterprise are used to finance extra training and mentoring of new
recruits (see Box 4.9).
Box 4.9 Triselec Lille: support the first steps in the labour market of disadvantaged young people
Triselec Lille is an enterprise located in the northern part of France specialised in collecting and sorting
waste, employing about 300 workers. Triselec Lille aims to support the social inclusion and labour market
integration of local residents facing obstacles to access employment, including young people. No selection
prior to recruitment in terms of qualification or experience is operated in order to allow those further away
from the labour market (unemployed for at least one year) to apply. About a quarter of all workers
recruited are young people with limited work experience, who are generally very low qualified, with some
of them lacking basic literacy skills (especially young migrants).
For young people, working at Triselec offers an opportunity to gain confidence while discovering the world
of work and requirements in an enterprise with high level of working standards (ISO-certified). Young
workers get trained to work on the sorting chain (a minimum 3 days of induction training and individualised
training and tutoring depending on the needs of the person) and also have an opportunity to elaborate a
new professional project, with the enterprise paying for training courses leading to the acquisition of a
vocational certification and supporting the outplacement process. State subsidies received by Triselec for
hiring long-term unemployed individuals compensate for the extra costs in terms of training, human
resources and management generated by the high turnover.
About 60% of former Triselec employees eventually find a job in another organisation or enterprise (but
not necessarily within the sector of public services). Important success factors identified are:
■ Accessibility and flexibility (employees that have not successfully adapted and left the company
prematurely can come back at a later stage)
■ Promotion of diversity and work ethics, playing an important role in the process of successful
integration and motivation of individuals
■ The use of innovative training tools such as videoconferencing and multimedia tools to overcome
26
Source: Official website http://travail-emploi.gouv.fr/emplois-d-avenir,2189/
33
Experts’ report
training barriers for participants, especially employees with limited literacy skills.
Are there any similar examples of good practice in your country?
4.7 Adapting recruitment processes and creating fairer chances for young people to enter and develop a career in Public Services
For Public Services, ensuring that transparent, competency-based recruitment procedures,
allowing to increase the diversity of the workforce are especially important at a time when skills
shortages can emerge due to the loss of experienced employees.
■ In Bulgaria, the Ministry of Public Administration is responsible for collecting applications from
young people interested in working in the sector n. The main selection criteria for recruitment
are the competences of young applicants including academic performance, knowledge of
foreign languages and IT skills. To facilitate the access to job positions in the public
administration, a specific simplified competition procedure for young people was laid out in the
Public Servant Act. This practice has been considered to have positive effects27
.
■ In France, it has been recently acknowledged in official documents that the State administration
should ‘better reflect the composition of the population and the diversity of origin and
background of young people’28
. According to the Action Plan for Youth presented in February
2013 by the government, , a project on diversity and recruitment in the public sector (civil
service) will be implemented in cooperation with trade unions starting in the spring of 2013 as
part of the agenda led by the Minister of State Reform, Decentralization and Public Service.
Furthermore, from 2013 onwards, public institutions depending from the ministries of Justice
and Home Affairs responsible for the initial training of civil servants (once they have
successfully passed an open competition) will also put in place special ‘equal opportunities’
preparatory classes for candidates to the competitions.
Box 4.10 Recommendations to improve recruitment and induction in Public Services (OECD, 2011, Fostering diversity in the public service’ in Public Servants as Partners for Growth: Toward a Stronger, Leaner and More Equitable Workforce)
■ Use all available mechanisms for job advertising and include pro-diversity statements in job
advertisements.
■ Enhance equity at entry through education through traineeships, scholarships etc.
■ Move away from purely academic competitive examinations.
■ Focus on job descriptions on skills, competencies and experience required for good performance.
■ Interview and selection panels should reflect diversity.
■ Design neutral recruitment exams eliminating elements that may be considered as the cause of
discrimination.
■ Adopt mechanisms to facilitate the transition to the working life in the public service (training,
mentoring).
■ Open the possibility to denounce cases of unfair and discriminatory practices.
Are there any similar examples of initiatives specifically linked with recruitment processes in Public
Services in your country?
27
Source: Information provided by CITUB (Confederation of Independent Trade Unions in Bulgaria) representative
28 Document issued by the Inter-Ministry Committee on Youth of the government available at:
http://www.jeunes.gouv.fr/IMG/pdf/CIJ_Rapport_21_fevrier_2013.pdf
34
Experts’ report
4.8 Improving the representation of the interests of young employees in Public Services
In Public Services, as in other sectors, young workers are typically underrepresented in works
councils and other employee representative bodies, which is partly due to the fact that many of
them work under temporary contracts. As a result young workers have limited opportunities to relay
their concerns and interests. Representative bodies voicing young peoples’ interests at the
organisation level and ensuring that these are taken into account by management can act as a
powerful lever of change and can also support the recruitment and retention of young employees.
A few examples can be found, for example in public administration, aiming to either improving the
representation of young people in existing representative bodies, or creating specific structures
open to young employees:
■ In the Netherlands, since 2012, a few young employees from the Dutch Ministry of Economic
Affairs have actively engaged in the activities of the Work Council of the Ministry, which reports
every monthly to the Secretary General. One third of all seats of the Work Council is currently
held by younger employees. Thanks to the change in composition of the Work Council,
discussions about the need to anticipate departures for retirement can get more attention
internally; representatives of young employees can voice their concerns and proposals on how
to create a suitable and stimulating work environment for new recruits within the Ministry.
■ In the Kent Council in the UK, a staff group which aims to represent the interests of younger
employees (under the age of 30) has been put in place. The aim of this staff group called
Aspire (formerly Greenhouse) is to ‘promote the value that younger colleagues bring to the
workplace as well as providing them with the tools and skills to progress and develop within the
Council’ and activities provide include the provision of training/development opportunities and
networking events. The staff group is formally recognised by the Kent Council and therefore the
organisation can seek to get feedback from the group on its employment policy.
■ In Germany, representative bodies for young workers and trainees (Jugend- und
Auszubildendenvertretung) can also be found across all economic sectors including Public
Services in accordance with the requirements of the BetrVG (Works Constitution Act). Indeed,
all establishments regularly employing at least five employees under the age of 18 or
vocational trainees under the age of 25 must set up a representative body for young workers
and trainees. Its responsibilities correspond to those of the works council in matters specific to
young employees and trainees; they work in close co-operation with the general work council.
All employees under the age of 18 and all vocational trainees under the age of 25 may
participate in elections for this council, which is elected for a two year period29
.
Another strategy to improve the representation of interests of young workers in Public Services is
to increase the representation of young people in trade union membership. According to a report
prepared by Working Lives Research Institute in 2011 on behalf of EPSU, the European Federation
of Public Service Unions, there is evidence that trade unions are currently increasing their efforts
towards a better representation of the interests of young workers and are leading campaigns to
recruit young people (Working Lives Institute, 2011). Increased efforts from trade unions to recruit
more young members are actually not limited to Public Services – over the past years, trade
unions have tended to use more ‘youth-friendly’ approaches such as social media campaigns and
online support mechanisms for interns, working students and trainees (Eurofound, 2011 b).
Are there any examples of good practice aiming to a fairer representation of young workers’
interests, either at the company, sectoral or even national level in your country?
29
Source: Eurofound
http://www.eurofound.europa.eu/emire/GERMANY/REPRESENTATIVEBODYFORYOUNGWORKERSANDTRAINEES-DE.htm
35
Experts’ report
5 Bibliography
Cambridge Econometrics (2013), Mapping evolutions in Public Services in Europe: towards increased
knowledge of industrial relations (Draft final scientific report prepared for CEEP)
Cedefop (2012) Future skills supply and demand in Europe, Research paper No 26 - Forecast 2012
Available at: http://www.cedefop.europa.eu/EN/publications/20633.aspx
CEEP (2012) Best CSR Practices in Public Services 2012
Available at:
http://www.ceep.eu/images/stories/pdf/publications/bpweb.pdf?c43417316a8c0ddb72ab1893be164a25=b9a7f
53135b6691b5bfbdb724dcee369
CEEP (2010) Public Services in the European Union & in the 27 Member States o
Available at:
http://www.ceep.eu/images/stories/pdf/Mapping/CEEP_mapping%20experts%20report.pdf?c43417316a8c0dd
b72ab1893be164a25=6016b077d2c927d36b16aa908f9b4d07
CEEP (2010 b), Anticipation of Change in Public Services
Available at: http://www.ceep.eu/images/stories/pdf/events/AOC/CEEP_politicalreport_DEF%200408.pdf
DARES (2011), L’apprentissage en 2010: des entrées presque aussi nombreuses qu’en 2009 et des contrats
plus longs
Available at; http://travail-emploi.gouv.fr/archives,1994/breves,409/etudes-recherche-statistiques-
de,76/etudes-et-recherche,77/publications-dares,98/dares-analyses-dares-indicateurs,102/2011-089-l-
apprentissage-en-2010,14266.html
ETUC (2012 a) Final report – Quality education for quality jobs
Available at:
http://www.etuc.org/IMG/pdf/Brochure_ETUC_Youth_EN_4.pdf
ETUCE (2012 a) Technical report of EFEE-ETUCE survey on recruitment and retention in the Education
sector.
ETUCE (2012 b) Analysis of a mini-survey on the impact of the economic crisis on teacher education in the
European Union
http://etuce.homestead.com/Crisis/Crisis_survey/Results_of_ETUCE_Minisurvey_on_Crisis_effecting_teacher
_education_.pdf
Eurofound (2011 a), Helping young workers during the crisis: contributions by social partners and public
authorities
Available at: http://www.eurofound.europa.eu/eiro/studies/tn1101019s/tn1101019s.htm
Eurofound (2011 b), Youth and Work
Available at: http://www.eurofound.europa.eu/pubdocs/2011/40/en/2/EF1140EN.pdf
Eurofound (2011 c), The social impact of the crisis
Available at: http://www.eurofound.europa.eu/pubdocs/2011/68/en/1/EF1168EN.pdf
Eurofound (2011 d) Comparative Analytical Report on Recent Policy Developments related to those Not in
Employment, Education and Training (NEET)
Available at: http://www.eurofound.europa.eu/emcc/erm/studies/tn1109042s/index.htm
European Commission (2012 a), Commission Staff Working Document on an Action Plan for the EU Health
Workforce, SWD (2012) 93 final
Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/health_consumer/docs/swd_ap_eu_healthcare_workforce_en.pdf
European Commission (2012 b), Apprenticeship supply in the Member States of the European Union
Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/education/vocational-education/doc/forum12/supply_en.pdf
36
Experts’ report
European Commission (2010) Employment in Europe 2010
Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/social/main.jsp?catId=738&langId=en&pubId=593
European Commission (2009) Comprehensive sectoral analysis of emerging competences and economic
activities in the European Union: Health and Social Work
Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/social/main.jsp?catId=784&langId=en
European Commission (2011) European Employment Observatory Review: Youth employment measures
2010
Available at: http://www.eu-employment-observatory.net/resources/reviews/EEOReview-YEM2010.pdf
European Commission (2011 b), Eurobarometer Flash No319b – Youth on the Move Analytical Report
Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/flash/fl_319b_en.pdf
EVA - European Academy for Environmentally Friendly Transport (2011) Employability in the face of
demographic change – Prospects for the European rail sector
Available at:
http://www.cer.be/publications/studies/2114-employability-in-the-face-of-demographic-change-prospects-for-
the-european-rail-sector
Henart L. (2009) Développer les formations en alternance dans le secteur public
Available at: http://www.ladocumentationfrancaise.fr/rapports-publics/094000504/index.shtml)
ICF GHK (2012 a) Summary of the Peer Review on ‘The dual training system - Integration of young people
into the labour market - Berlin, 24-25 September 2012
Available at: http://www.mutual-learning-
employment.net/uploads/ModuleXtender/PeerReviews/95/Full_summary_Berlin_Final.pdf
ICF GHK (2012 b) ‘Developing ‘dual vocational training’ to support the labour market insertion of young
people: can Spain catch up with Germany? Mutual Learning Programme Case Study’
Available at: http://www.mutual-learning-
employment.net/MLP%20Case%20Study%20Apprenticeships_Approved%20EC_150113.pdf
ICF GHK (2012 c) Employers’ practice for active ageing. Report commissioned by Business Europe, CEEP
and UEAPME
Available at http://www.ueapme.com/IMG/pdf/Final_synthesis_report_10_december_2012.pdf
McKinnon R. (2010) ‘An ageing workforce and strategic human resource management: Staffing challenges for
social security administrations’, International Social Security Review, Vol. 63, 3-4/2010
OCED (2011) ‘Managing the public workforce through difficult times’ in Public Servants as Partners for
Growth: Toward a Stronger, Leaner and More Equitable Workforce
OECD (2011 b) ‘Fostering diversity in the public service’ in Public Servants as Partners for Growth: Toward a
Stronger, Leaner and More Equitable Workforce
OECD/Scarpetta S., Sonnet A., Manfredi T. (2010) Rising youth unemployment during the crisis: how to
prevent negative long-term consequences on a generation?, OECD Social, Employment and Migration
Papers, NO. 106
Available at: http://www.oecd.org/employment/youthforum/44986030.pdf
Working Lives Research Institute (2011), Training, jobs and decent work for young people, report
commissioned by EPSU