Fort Stanwix National Monument Energy Audit
description
Transcript of Fort Stanwix National Monument Energy Audit
Final Presentation MSDIIMonday, May 18th, 2009
Customer: FSNM, Debbie ConwayGuide: Brian Thorn
P09453
Quick Overview of ProjectProblem Statement
To identify short and long-term opportunities to reduce energy consumption and energy costs at FSNM, to assess potential ‘green’ energy opportunities and to educate visitors about them.
Motivation The Willett Center has dramatically added to FSNM’s energy consumption. Total energy
costs with the addition of the Willett Center amount to ~$78,000/year in energy costs.
Approach Gather needs, Current energy usage profile, On-site review, Baseline research ESCO analysis, Equest computer simulation model Generate Energy Conservation Measures (ECMs) Economic analysis and implementation requirements
Result Potential for multiple ECMs to be implemented
Approximate Gas savings – 50%, Electricity savings -20% Assuming ECMs are independent, no interaction
All Information Available OnlineWebsite:
https://edge.rit.edu/content/P09453/public/Home
Multiple Analyses CompletedUsed the energy bills fro a two year period to create
energy consumption profile
Also used energy bills to generate:
Energy Use Index, load factors
Building Envelope analysis
These analyses helped assess opportunities for ECMs
On-site AssessmentsOnsite assessments conduced in Dec 08 and Jan 09
Collected Data on energy use patterns and assessed opportunities for ECMsDocumented:
Energy consumption systems (HVAC, lights, fans, pumps, etc) Energy consumption devices (Computers, TVs, Monitors, etc) Visitor attendance and building occupancy trends Assessed building envelope for heat loss/gain using Infrared Imaging
All pictures and lists available on EDGE
On-sites enabled eQuest modeling & profile breakdown
Windows in Lobby Windows in Lobby under IR
DOE – eQuest SoftwareUsed to evaluate certain ECMs, powerful free
software, provided by the DOEAn accurate model of the Willett Center was
created, using:Energy consumptions profiles, patterns and documented dataBuilding envelope characteristics and local weather data
Model was validated against actual energy usage
The model and eQuest website are available on EDGE
Energy Conservation Measures - ECMsMultiple tools were utilized to evaluate and assess
the energy and cost savings associated with each ECMDeveloped from on site assessment, observation, and
calculations and software modelingeQuest output for certain ECMs:
Additional eQuest ECMs and detailed information are presented in the report
Energy Conservation Measures - ECMsAdditional ECMs generated and evaluated on a benefit-
cost relationshipShort term: operation & maintenance approach, low cost
replacements and or upgradesLong term: retrofit through replacement, upgrade systems
Non-eQuest ECMs, behavioral and operational changes
Additional information is presented in the report
Bottom Line Total SavingsBy implementing all recommended ECMs,
total possible savings:~50% of annual gas bill~20% of annual electric bill
Translates into a monetary savings of:$6850/year for gas energy$8100/year for electric energy
Assuming ECMs are independent events and interaction effects are negligible
ECMs for Fort & Maintenance Shed
Location Long vs Short
ECM, ESO Probable Impact
Fort & Maintenance Shed
Short Turn off lights & Energy Consuming Devices – especially in the Maintenance shed
Small
Fort & Maintenance Shed
Short Replace T12 with T8 lights Medium
Maintenance Shed
Long New roof to stop heat loss (currently leaking) Medium
Maintenance Shed
Long Replace heating system, 30 year old heaters, working but consume significant energy
Small
Fort Long Replace kitchen and auditorium equipment Small
Fort Long Replace AC unit in Fort (30+ years old) Medium
Scope of project was the Willett Center; however, a list of ECMs was created for the Fort & Maintenance shed
Note: total savings does not count these ECMs
Solar Energy DemoGoal is to show the NPS’s commitment to
renewable energy through promoting education and awareness of renewable energy sources Limited to 1 quarter of design and build timeMultiple avenues and directions taken from PRP
Settled on scale model demo to illustrate factors of solar panel implementationMany iterations and revisions of demoVarious testing for each iteration guided future
attempts
Small scale interactive solar panel exhibit was constructed
Solar Energy DemoFactors Demonstrated by demo:
Angle between solar panel and sunAmount of sunlight available
Two key test phases were used to ensure demo was effective in promoting education and awareness and safe.E3 Fair at RIT on April 30th, 2009
Hundreds of middle school students interact with various projects
Imagine RIT Festival on May 2nd, 2009 Public welcomed on campus for public viewing of student projects
Both tests were successful and valuable knowledge from each was obtained
Various design, build and test data available on EDGE
Solar Energy Demo & Pictures
Photos taken at E3 Fair (available on EDGE)Time for a brief demonstration of the demo
Thought provoking questions attached to demoHelps promoting education
Important Note: If 300W blub is intense, use 200W bulb with more direct angles and increase highet of panels 2 in.
Delivering Final FSNM summary presentationFinal Energy Assessment report with recommendations
Containing all recommendations & informationESCO analysisPaper and electronic appendices included
All files used during MSD I & II available on EDGEBinder containing non-electronic data & documentsSolar Energy DemoSpare parts for solar energy demoFinal ‘Project Poster’ – to be mailed after printed and
mounted at RIT’s Senior Design Center
Special Thanks to:Debbie Conway Todd GerrardFSNM StaffDr. Brian Thorn (Faculty Guide)Dr. Andres Carrano (Faculty Support)Dr. Robert Stevens (Faculty Support)
References http://www.eia.doe.gov/cneaf/electricity/epm/table5_6_a.html http://www.unitconversion.org/energy/therms-to-btus-th-conversio
n.html http://www.npga.org/i4a/pages/index.cfm?pageid=914