"Forage Fish in Puget Sound," Presentation to WA House Environment Committee 13 March 2014

14
Tessa Francis, PhD University of Washington Tacoma Puget Sound Institute WA House Environment Committee March 13, 2014 Forage Fish in Puget Sound: Status, Importance, and Recovery

description

Testimony given to the Washington State House Environment Committee on the importance, status and recovery of forage fish species in Puget Sound. Audio accompaniment can be found on TVW http://www.tvw.org/index.php?option=com_tvwplayer&eventID=2014031031

Transcript of "Forage Fish in Puget Sound," Presentation to WA House Environment Committee 13 March 2014

Page 1: "Forage Fish in Puget Sound," Presentation to WA House Environment Committee 13 March 2014

Tessa Francis, PhD University of Washington Tacoma

Puget Sound Institute

WA House Environment Committee March 13, 2014

Forage Fish in Puget Sound: Status, Importance, and Recovery

Page 2: "Forage Fish in Puget Sound," Presentation to WA House Environment Committee 13 March 2014

Pacific  herring  Clupea  pallasii  

photo  by  Walter  Rung  

Surf  smelt  Hypomesus  pre/osus  

photo  by  Frank  Varga  

Sand  lance  Ammodytes  hexapterus    

photo  by  Ground  Truth  Trekking  

Meet  the  fish.  

Page 3: "Forage Fish in Puget Sound," Presentation to WA House Environment Committee 13 March 2014

Forage  fish  are  more  valuable  in  the  water  than  out.  

Harbor  Seals:  80%  

Chinook  salmon:  80%

   

Lingcod:  95%  

Orcas  

Rhinoceros  auklet:  70%  

Marbled  murrelet:  60%  

TuGed  puffin    

Photo  by  Peter  Hodum  

Page 4: "Forage Fish in Puget Sound," Presentation to WA House Environment Committee 13 March 2014

Forage  fish  are  30-­‐60  Lmes  more  valuable  in  the  water  

Source:  DFW  2008,  TCW  Economics;  LenFest  Forage  Fish  Task  Force  Report  

Direct  value   SupporLve  value  

$25  million  $0.4  –  0.8  million  

Page 5: "Forage Fish in Puget Sound," Presentation to WA House Environment Committee 13 March 2014

Key  Indicators  of  Ecosystem  Health  Food  web  connec*ons  

Forage  fish  

Zooplankton  

Phytoplankton  

Predators  

Page 6: "Forage Fish in Puget Sound," Presentation to WA House Environment Committee 13 March 2014

Key  Indicators  of  Ecosystem  Health  Human  impacts  

Shoreline  development  Contaminants/pollutants  Water  quality  

Human  AcLviLes  

Page 7: "Forage Fish in Puget Sound," Presentation to WA House Environment Committee 13 March 2014

Pacific  herring  Engraulis  mordax  

photo  by  Walter  Rung  

What  is  their  status?  

0

3,000

6,000

9,000

12,000

15,000

18,000

1973 1978 1983 1988 1993 1998 2003 2008 2013 2018

TON

S

Adult Herring Spawner Biomass

Page 8: "Forage Fish in Puget Sound," Presentation to WA House Environment Committee 13 March 2014

Pacific  herring  Engraulis  mordax  

photo  by  Walter  Rung  

?  photo  by  Frank  Varga  

?  

What  is  their  status?  

0

3,000

6,000

9,000

12,000

15,000

18,000

1973 1978 1983 1988 1993 1998 2003 2008 2013 2018

TON

S

Adult Herring Spawner Biomass

Page 9: "Forage Fish in Puget Sound," Presentation to WA House Environment Committee 13 March 2014

Pacific  herring  Engraulis  mordax  

photo  by  Frank  Varga  

photo  by  Ground  Truth  Trekking  

We  have  major  challenges  

Herring 1.  We  don’t  know  why  herring  are  declining.  •  Habitat  loss  •  PredaEon  •  PolluEon  •  Prey  •  Disease  •  Disturbance  

     

 2.  We  don’t  know  populaEon  status  of  surf  

smelt  or  sand  lance.  •  How  many  are  there?  •  How  many  do  we  need?  

Page 10: "Forage Fish in Puget Sound," Presentation to WA House Environment Committee 13 March 2014

We  do  know  habitat  ma]ers  

•  Herring  populaEon  is  2x  more  stable  because  of  habitat  diversity.    

 •  Shoreline  development  degrades  

forage  fish  spawning  habitat.  •  Higher  egg  mortality  •  Higher  temperatures  •  Loss  of  fresh  sediment  supply  

Page 11: "Forage Fish in Puget Sound," Presentation to WA House Environment Committee 13 March 2014

What  acLons  are  we  taking?  

•  Puget  Sound  Partnership  is  tracking  Pacific  herring  as  an  indicator  of  ecosystem  health.    

•  Puget  Sound  InsLtute  has  convened  a  panel  of  forage  fish  experts  to  fill  key  informaEon  gaps  using  exisEng  data.  

 •  Puget  Sound  Ecosystem  Monitoring  

Program  has  prioriEzed  measuring  sand  lance  and  surf  smelt  abundance.    

•  Dept  of  Fish  &  Wildlife  is  taking  a  precauEonary  approach  with  fisheries  management.    

•  Dept  of  Fish  &  Wildlife  requires  HPA  permit  to  develop  shorelines.  

Page 12: "Forage Fish in Puget Sound," Presentation to WA House Environment Committee 13 March 2014

What  more  should  we  be  doing?  

1.  Collect  abundance  data  for  surf  smelt  and  sand  lance      

2.  EsEmate  the  abundance  of  surf  smelt  and  sand  lance  using  exisLng  data    

3.  Determine  the  limitaEons  to  herring  recovery  using  exisLng  data    

4.  Collect  biological  informaEon    

5.  Improve  habitat  protecEon  regulaEons    

6.  Limit  fisheries  harvest    

7.  Monitor  predators  and  prey  

Page 13: "Forage Fish in Puget Sound," Presentation to WA House Environment Committee 13 March 2014
Page 14: "Forage Fish in Puget Sound," Presentation to WA House Environment Committee 13 March 2014

Thank  you.