FIVE YEAR REVIEW SITE INSPECTION CHECKLIST(Working document for site inspection. Information may be...

15
s& OSWER So •iiU '•')i3-P Please note that "O&M" is referred to throughout this checklist At sites where Long-Term Response Actions are in progress, O&M activities may be referred to as "system operations' since these sites are not considered to be in the O&M phase while being remediated under the Supcrrund program.. , Five-Year Review Site Inspection Checltiist (Template) (Working document for site inspection. Information may be completed by hand and attached to the Five-Year Review report as supporting documentation of site stanis. "N/A" refers to"not3pplicable.') I. SITE INFORMATION Site name; y ^^.^ (U\1A^,JU^ Location and Region; Agency, office, or company leading the flvc-year review; Date of inspection; / / J C ~ ] / a i O O ^ EPA ID: Wcaiher/tcmpcTitnre: Remedy Includes: (Check all that apply) . • Landfill cover/containment 0 Access controls 1 Institutional controls Groundwater pump and treatment Surface water collection and treatment Monitored natural attenuation Groundwater containmenc Vertical barrier wails Surface water collection and treatment / / .^ J , Other j;r/,/,ji AuM-Z^A^ nno n i j o - u ^ / £7naHn i^^ridar /?ior)/^r/'7^ Attachments: Inspection team roster attached Site map attached II. INTERVIEWS (Check all that apply) 1. QAM Mte manager /ZcQ-fi^ fyS^ hcj Name Interviewed (StSJJ^ 3t office by phone Phone no. Problems, suggestions; Report attached Title Date 2. OdcM staff. 7W Name Title Intervriewed at site at office by phone Phone no. Problems^ suggestions; Report attached i ^ . , Date D-7

Transcript of FIVE YEAR REVIEW SITE INSPECTION CHECKLIST(Working document for site inspection. Information may be...

Page 1: FIVE YEAR REVIEW SITE INSPECTION CHECKLIST(Working document for site inspection. Information may be completed by hand and attached to the Five-Year Review report as supporting documentation

s&

OSWER So • i i U ' • ' ) i3 -P

Please note that "O&M" is referred to throughout this checklist At sites where Long-Term Response Actions are in progress, O&M activities may be referred to as "system operations' since these sites are not considered to be in the O&M phase while being remediated under the Supcrrund program..

, Five-Year Review Site Inspection Checltiist (Template)

(Working document for site inspection. Information may be completed by hand and attached to the Five-Year Review report as supporting documentation of site stanis. "N/A" refers to"not3pplicable.')

I. SITE INFORMATION

Site name; y ^ ^ . ^ ( U \ 1 A ^ , J U ^

Location and Region;

Agency, office, or company leading the flvc-year review;

Date of inspection; / / J C ~ ] / a i O O ^

EPA ID:

Wcaiher/tcmpcTitnre:

Remedy Includes: (Check all that apply) . • Landfill cover/containment 0 Access controls 1 Institutional controls

Groundwater pump and treatment Surface water collection and treatment

Monitored natural attenuation Groundwater containmenc Vertical barrier wails

Surface water collection and treatment • / / .^ J

, Other j;r/,/,ji AuM-Z A nno n i j o - u ^ / £7naHn i^^ridar /?ior)/^r/'7^

Attachments: Inspection team roster attached Site map attached

II. INTERVIEWS (Check all that apply)

1. QAM Mte manager /ZcQ-fi^ fyS^ h c j Name

Interviewed (StSJJ^ 3t office by phone Phone no. Problems, suggestions; Report attached

Title Date

2. OdcM staff. 7W Name Title

Intervriewed at site at office by phone Phone no. Problems^ suggestions; Report attached i . ,

Date

D-7

Page 2: FIVE YEAR REVIEW SITE INSPECTION CHECKLIST(Working document for site inspection. Information may be completed by hand and attached to the Five-Year Review report as supporting documentation

3.

O i H f , ' ? .Vo J i < < ~ - ' B - P

Local regulatory authorities and response agencies ( i c . State and tnbal olTices. emergency response office, police department, ofTice of public health or environmental health, zoning oiTice recorder of deeds, or other city and county otTices, etc.) Fill in all that apply

.•\gency _ _ _ _ ^ _ _ Contact ]

Name Problems; suggestions; Report attached

Agency Contact

Name Problems; suggestions; Report attached

Agency Contact

Name Problems; suggestions; Report attached

Title

Title

Title

Date

Date

Date

Phone no

Phone no.

Phone no.

Agency Contact

Name Problems; suggestions; Report attached

Title Date Phone no.

4. Other interviews (optional) Report attached.

/ / O T ar7-M^^<^i^^ ^ VX ^tUi, ^ c / /

D-8

Page 3: FIVE YEAR REVIEW SITE INSPECTION CHECKLIST(Working document for site inspection. Information may be completed by hand and attached to the Five-Year Review report as supporting documentation

9.

OSWER So v j ? } ' o . ' S . p

n i . ON-SITE DOCUMENTS A RECORDS VERIFIED (Check all that apply)

O&M Documents O&M manual Readily available Up to date. As-built drawings Readily available ' Lp to date Maintenance logs Readily available^ Lp to date

Remarks } N f o 1 ^ m / I T I Q / l /5 /I37- /^v^//?/7^y>.

\ \ N A N A

7 > n n u ^ ^

Site-Specific Health and Safety Plan Contingency plan/emergency response plan

Remarks . ^ A - ^ i n S a ^ / f / r c t i A ^

Readily available Readily available

Up to date Up to date

N A,

S A

3. ' O&M and OSHA Training Records . Readily available Remarks C ^ / S ^ ^ r?7f/ jfy

Up to date -SE)

Permits and Service Agreements Air discharge permit EfFluent discharge Waste disposal. POTW Other pennits

Remarks '

Readily available Readily available Readily available Readily available

Up to date Up to date Up to date Up to date

Gas Generation Records Remarks

Readily available Up to date (NiA,

Settlement Monument Records Remarks

Readily available Up to date ^ / A y

Groundwater Monitoring Recordir Really available ^ , _Up to 'N/A

Leachate Extraction Record* Remarks

Readily available Up to date ^f^

Discharge CompUsncc Records Air Water (effiuent)

Remarks

Readily available Readily available

Up to date Up to date N/A

10. Daily Access/Security i^ogi Remarks.

Readily ava^able Up to date , ^ ( ^ A y

'C 'K- vuiL//J, £/f^ / jrxj.uc/j6.4cf^ Uy f- CJ ' 'v^A-^ ' S i ' ^ ^ y i ^ Cc^iin^r7~iLy^t£>; ^^^Y^^

0 - 9

Page 4: FIVE YEAR REVIEW SITE INSPECTION CHECKLIST(Working document for site inspection. Information may be completed by hand and attached to the Five-Year Review report as supporting documentation

OS WE.If v,j sij.V'! • .^;3.p

1

2.

3.

IV. O&M COSTS

O&M Organization State in-house Contactor for State PRP in-house Contractor for PRP Federal Facility in-house Contractor for Federal Facility Other

O&M Cost Records flh^lhfl^ C^-^^^-tjUy^-^c/M ^( /^tCC fii^inn^ iZ) Readily available U p d a t e / ; ^ / ^ p ^ A j f 4. j i d l A . d U t ^ . : Funding mechanism/agreement in place

Orieinal O&M cost estimate , , „ . , _ Hreakdown attarhir^

Total annual cost by year for review period if available

From To Breakdown attache*^ Date Date Total cost

From To Breakdown anachecf Date Date Total cost

From To Breakdown atia<rh«t Date Date Total cost

From To ,, Breakdown attacheH Date Date Total cost

From To , . _ Breakdown attached Date . Date Total cost

Unanticipated or Unusually High O&M Costs During Review Period nescrihe cnst« and reasons: ,. A ' C ?

V. ACCESS AND INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS Applicable N/A

A.

1.

B.

I.

Fencing t f U S f i E T C l ^ p ^ ^ U / f ^ T h ' C L t /

Fencing damaged Location shown on site map Gates secured N/A Rnmarica

Other Access Restriction*

Signs and other security measure* Location shown on site map N/A Rftmarka

0-10

Page 5: FIVE YEAR REVIEW SITE INSPECTION CHECKLIST(Working document for site inspection. Information may be completed by hand and attached to the Five-Year Review report as supporting documentation

OSWER Vo • ) ) ! ! ^ .\13.p

C. Inst i tut ional Controls (ICs)

1. Implementation and enforcement Site conditions imply ICs not properly implemented Site conditions imply ICs not being fully enforced

Yes < ^ ^ Yes \ o

N A

Type of monitoring {e.g. Frequency f^^Cj Responsible party/agency Contact

, self-reporting, dnve hy't S ^ l U ) f i i f j / ) ^ i / y l i f U / l t y / / , ^

Name Title

Reporting is up-to-date Reports are verified by the lead agency

Specific requirements in deed or decision documents have been met Violations have been reported , Other problems or suggestions: Report attached

Date

Yes Yes

Yes Yea

Phone no

No No

No No

N/A N/A

N/A N/A

C r ) ~ c y i , . i > - - ! L ^ / ( l U u f - i ^ i ^ ^ j y t - " f ^^ / ^ ^ ^ ^ J J C ^ I Y T ^ -

Adequacy Remarks

ICs are adequate ICs are inadequate N/A

D. General

I. Vandalism/trespassli Remarks

Ing Location shown on site map, No vandalism evident . / ' •

t- ^ _ L 2. Land use changes on site N/A /))/)

Remarks ^ ^

3. Land use changes off sit* N/A Remarira

VI. GENERAL SITE CONDITIONS

A. Road* plicable/ N/A

1. Roads damaged Location shown on site map Roads adequate N/A

D-ll

Page 6: FIVE YEAR REVIEW SITE INSPECTION CHECKLIST(Working document for site inspection. Information may be completed by hand and attached to the Five-Year Review report as supporting documentation

OSWER \o sJj. V -.ms.p

B. Other Site Conditions

Remarks-

Vn. LANDFILL COVERS Applicable N/A

A. Landnil Surface

1. Settlement (Low spots) Areal extent " Remarks

Location shown on site map (Senletnent not evident^ Depth

2. Cracks Lengths_ Remarks.

Location shown on site map Widths Depths

Erosion Areal extent. Remarks

Location shown on site map Depth

~Eros4on-not eviderit)

Holes Areal extent. Remarks

Location shown on site map Depth

Vegetative Cover Grass Cover properiy established v^J^^o^i^ns of stress;; Trees/Shrubs (indicate size and locations on a diagram)

Remarics ', \ :

6. Alternative Cover (armored rocit, concrete, etc.) Remarics

N/A

7. Bulge* Areal extent. Remarks

Location shown on site map (^ Bulges not evidentj Height. ^—^>^^

D-12

Page 7: FIVE YEAR REVIEW SITE INSPECTION CHECKLIST(Working document for site inspection. Information may be completed by hand and attached to the Five-Year Review report as supporting documentation

.O i ,WER\ ' o -^S^^ ' - I ' S - P

Wet Areas/Water Damage Wet areas Ponding Seeps Soft subgrade

Remarks

Wet-ateas^water damagejioLevij Location shown on site map .-Vreal extent. Location shown on site map .-Kreal extent. Location shown on site map .\feal extent. Location shown on site map .Areal extent.

Slope Instability Areal extent Remarks

Slides Location shown on site map <_^ajvidencejMjlope instability

B. Benches Applicable ^->fel/A_^ (Horizontally constructed mounds of earth placed across a steep landfill side slope to interrupt ihe slope in order to slow dovim the velocity of surface runofT and intercept and convey the runoff to a lined channel.)

1. Flows Bypass Bench Remarks

Location shown on site map N/A or okay

2. . Bench Breached Remarks

Location shown on site map N/A or okay

3. Bench Overtopped Remarks

Location shown on site map N/A or okay

C, Letdown Channels Applicable (^N/A J (Channel lined with erosion control mats, nprap, grout bags, or gabions that descend down the steep sideslopeof the cover and will allow the runoff water collected by the benches to move off of the landfill cover without creating erosion gullies.)

I. Settlement Areal extent. Remarks

Location shown on site map Depth .

No evidence of settlement

Material Degradatioi Material type Remarks

Location shown on site map , No evidence of degradation /*Lreal extent

Erosion Areal extent. Remarks

Location shown on site map Depth

No evidence of erosion

D-13

Page 8: FIVE YEAR REVIEW SITE INSPECTION CHECKLIST(Working document for site inspection. Information may be completed by hand and attached to the Five-Year Review report as supporting documentation

OSWER \'o J / , ' . ' ' •'•J P

4.

5.

6.

D.

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

Undercutting Location shown Areal extent Depth Remarks

Obstructions Type Location shown on site map

Size Remarks

Excessive Vegetative Growth T No evidence of excessive growth Vegetation in chaiuiels does not obstruct flo

. Location shown on site map Remarks

Cover Penetrations Applicable ^J;f/Ay

Gas Vents Active Properly secured/locked Functioning Evidence of leakage at penetration N/A

Remarks

Gas Monitoring Probes Properly secured/locked Functioning Evidence of leakage at penetration

Remarks

on site map No evidence of undercuning

No obstructions .•\rcal extent

voe

w Areal extent

Passive ' Routinely sampled Good condition

Needs Maintenance

Routinely sampled Good condition Needs Maintenance N/A

Monitoring Weils (within surface area of landfill) Properly secured/locked Functioning Routinely sampled Good condition Evidence of leakage at penetration Needs Maintenance N/A

Remarks

Leachate Extraction Wells Properly secured/locked Functioning Evidence of leakage at penetration

Remarks

Settlement Monuments Located

Routinely sampled Good condition .Needs Maintenance N/A

Routinely surveyed N/A

D-14

Page 9: FIVE YEAR REVIEW SITE INSPECTION CHECKLIST(Working document for site inspection. Information may be completed by hand and attached to the Five-Year Review report as supporting documentation

E.

1.

2.

3.

F.

1.

2.

G.

I.

2.

3.

4.

Gas Collection and Treatment

Gas Treatment Facilities Flaring Good condition

Remarks

Applicable >{

Thermal destruction Needs Maintenance

Gas Collection Wells, Manifolds and Piping Good condition Needs Maintenance

Remarks

Gas Monitoring Facilities ( Good condition

Remarks

Cover Drainage Layer

Outlet Pipes Inspected Remarks

Outlet Rock Inspected Remark.q

Detention/Sedimentation Ponds

Siltation Areal extent Siltation not evident

Remark.1

N/A)

05WER Vo -iiSS r . ) i3 -P

Collection for reuse

e.g., gas monitonng of adjacent homes or buildings) Needs Maintenance N/A

Applicable

""-^ctioningy

^^TunctioiiingJ)

Applicable

Depth

ITrfMinn Areal extent Depth

Erosion not evident Remark.^

Outlet Work* Remarks

Dan RftmaHf.*

Functioning N/A

Functioning N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

f S ^ N/A

D-15

Page 10: FIVE YEAR REVIEW SITE INSPECTION CHECKLIST(Working document for site inspection. Information may be completed by hand and attached to the Five-Year Review report as supporting documentation

. ^ ^ OSWE.if V j ^ j ( ( - . . , . . 5 . ^

H. Retaining Walls . Applicable 'Qi/j^

Deformations Location shown on site map Deformation not evident Honzontal displacement Verrical displacement_ Rotational displacement,; Remarks

2. Degradation Location shown on site map Degradation not evident Remarks

I. Perimeter Ditches/Off-Site Discharge Applicable \ § i ' \ J

1. Siltation Location shown on site map Siltation not evident Areal extent Depth Remarks

2. Vegetative Growth Location shown on site map N/A Vegetation does not impede flow

Areal extent Tvpe Remarks _ _ ^

4. Discharge Structure Functioning N/A Remarks

Performance MonitoringType of monitonng Performance not monitored

Frequency Evidence of breaching Head difFerential_____ Remarks__ .

3. Erosion Location shown on site map Erosion not evident Areal extent Depth ' Remarks .

VIIL VERTICAL BARRIER WALLS Applicable (^ZT)

I. Settlement Location shown on site map Settlement not evident Areal extent Depth Remarks - .—-

D-16

Page 11: FIVE YEAR REVIEW SITE INSPECTION CHECKLIST(Working document for site inspection. Information may be completed by hand and attached to the Five-Year Review report as supporting documentation

OSWER.Wo. 9i5S 7.0!a.P

IX. GROUNDWATER/SURFACE WATER RE.MEDIES Applicable Q / \ )

A. Groundwater Extraction Wells, Pumps, and Pipelines Applicable ^ ^ L

Pumps, Wellhead Plumbing, and Electrical Good condition All required wells properly operating Needs Maintenance N .\

Remarks

2. Extraction System Pipelines, Valves, Valve Boxes, and Other .Appurtenances Good condition Needs Maintenance

Remarks . .

3. Spare Parts and Equipment Readily available Good condition Requires upgrade Needs to be provided

Remarks_ -.. ;

B. Surface Water Collection Structures, Pumps, and Pipelines Applicable ( ^ N / A ^

1. Collection Structures, Pumps, and Electrical Good condition Needs Maintenance

R e m a r k s ^ -.

2. Surface Water Collection System Pipelines, Valves, Valve Boxes, and Other Appurtenar.ces Good condition Needs Maintenance

Remark.'i . _

3. Spare Parts and Equipment Readily available Good condition Requires upgrade Needs to be provided

Remarks ] : .

D-17

Page 12: FIVE YEAR REVIEW SITE INSPECTION CHECKLIST(Working document for site inspection. Information may be completed by hand and attached to the Five-Year Review report as supporting documentation

C. Treatment System Applicable N/A

Treatment Train (Check components that apply) Metals removal Oil/water separation Air stnpping Carbon adsorbers Filters • Additive {e.g., chelation agent, flocculentL Others Good condition Needs .Maintenance Sampling ports properly marked and fiinctional Sampling/maintenance log displayed and up to date Equipment properly identified Quantity of groundwater treated annually Quantity of surface water created annually.

Remarks

OSWER \ o JJ.^T '3-P

Bioremediation

Electrical Enclosures and Panels (properly rated and f\mctional) N/A Good condition Needs Maintenance

Remarks_ •

Taniu, Vaults, Storage Vessels N/A Good condition

Remarks Proper secondary containment Needs Maintenance

4. Discharge Structure and Appurtenances N/A Good condition Needs Maintenance

Remarks

5. Treatment Building(s) N/A Good condition (esp. roof and doorways) Chemicals and equipment properly stored

Remarks

Needs repair

Monitoring Wells (pump and treatment remedy) Properly secured/locked Functioning Routinely sampled All required wells located Needs Maintenance

Remarics_ ,

Good condition N/A

D. Monitoring Data.

1. Monitoring tJata Is routinely submitted on time Is of acceptable quality

Monitoring data suggests: Groundwater plume is effectively contained Contaminant concentrations are declining

D-18

Page 13: FIVE YEAR REVIEW SITE INSPECTION CHECKLIST(Working document for site inspection. Information may be completed by hand and attached to the Five-Year Review report as supporting documentation

D. Monitored Natural Attenuation

OSWER.\o. 9J55 'O.'a-P

Monitoring Wells (nattiral attenuation remedy) Properiy secured/locked Functioning Routinely sampled All required wells located Needs Maintenance

Remarks

Good condition N/A

.X. OTHER REMEDIES

If there are remedies applied at the site which are not covered above, attach an inspection sheet descnbing the physical nature and condition of any facility associated with the remedy. An example would be soil vapor extraction.

XL OVERALL OBSERVATIONS

Implementation of the Remedy

Describe issues and observations relating to whether the remedy is effective and Functioning as designed. Begin with a brief statement of what the remedy is to accomplish (i.e., to contain contaminant plume, minimize infiltration and gas emission, etc.).

B. Adequacy of O&M

Describe issues and observations related to the implementabon and scope of O&M procedures. In particular, discuss their relationship to the current and long-term protectiveness of the remedy.

D-19

Page 14: FIVE YEAR REVIEW SITE INSPECTION CHECKLIST(Working document for site inspection. Information may be completed by hand and attached to the Five-Year Review report as supporting documentation

. * i .

OSWER S o siJ.^J ' - .J . ' -J-P

C. Early Indicators of Potential Remedy Problems

Describe issues and observations such as unexpected changes in the cost or scope of O&.M or a high frequency of unscheduled repairs, that suggest that the protectiveness of the remedy may be compromised in the ftiture. , ^^ /»

1/ (rnj_^.

D. Opportunities for Optimization

Describe possible opportunities for optimization in monitoring tasks or the operation of the remedy.

r \ / / i ^ : \

D-20

Page 15: FIVE YEAR REVIEW SITE INSPECTION CHECKLIST(Working document for site inspection. Information may be completed by hand and attached to the Five-Year Review report as supporting documentation

Revision

A Orscriplion Dole

-•/IJ/M

B-

' • ^

;::: i T ^ ' ^ f) y u - ^ ^

LEGEND

— — pBoPCnrr UHE

EPaSTIHC COMlOUflS

DosTiNc a£cm>c BOI

4

POSTING UONITORINC *tU.

- • ' SWAII

cnsTiMG uTxjrr Pa,£

DOSTWC VXX. Cf PAWKC

cosTiHc rocE or rtt><t

- . — PaSTlNC 0*AIH UNK rENCE

- ^ • ^ EDCC OF WOCOED AflEA

- — — COCC OF CAP

— UWlT Of EXCAVATION

ACCESS ffOAO

R £ S T O « A T 1 0 J iULA

CHAHNCLS AX) BCnuS

DdSTtHC 0«AMMCLS AMO SERUS

STOMC PAVtD AREA

SUBIWAIH PIPE

NOTES:

w e FOOT OF SCHL aiOtJLD BE RCUOV^D FRQU THC SURFACE W Au. SITE RESTORAHON Afl£AS (EXCEPT EXCAVATIOM AREAS). IHIS SOH. SHOULD BE PLACED BENCATH THE CAP.

EXISTING TREES WU. BEUAJH IH STE RESTORATICN AflEAS. AS »<0*« ON THE DRAVMNC. UMLESS DESIGNATED O T H E R M S E B Y IHE COHSTRuCTlCW UAMACCR.

DRAINAGE OlANNEL^ 100 T H R O U O I 1000 SHAU. BE CONSTRUCTIO AS INDICATEP ON Pl-ATC 6. DETAJLS a, 9 AND 12. SPEOnC O I U E N S O N S AND UNINCS FOR EACH CHANNEL ffiZ. USTED IN TABLE 1 CH PLATt 0.

TttO FOOT CONTOURS ABE SHOWN ON THE DRAWNC FOB PROPOSED HNAL CONTOJRS. ONC FOOT CONTOURS AAE SHOW FOR EXISTING CONTOURS.

REVERE CHEMICAL SITE CAP CONSTEUCTION

NOCKAMIXON TOWNSHIP, PENNSYLVANIA " " 1 / 1 ! / "

' 1--60-

P.5.C.

— " - . . - . c .

" " • " C T . H

" " " ~ 97-JJ9-t)7

nNAL GRADING PUN

/ ^ r - Advanced GeoServices Corp.

PLATE:

4