Final Report Iip

download Final Report Iip

of 101

Transcript of Final Report Iip

  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Iip

    1/101

    I connect Final Report

    Institute for Technology and Management Business SchoolPGDM

    (Batch 2013-15)

    Industry Internship Project 2014

    Title of the project:

    Analysis and Study of Channel satisfaction with respect to MTS data

    products and benchmarking the same

    Vis--vis competitors

    Submitted by: Anoop IndoliaProgram: PGDM-MarketingPGDM ID: 3850

    Company Guide: Faculty Guide:Vijesh Bhatnagar Prof. Arpita PandeyData Retail Area Manager Assistant Professor Marketing

    Institute for Technology and Management, Navi Mumbai

  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Iip

    2/101

    I connect Final Report

    Acknowledgements

    This report is an assimilation of co-operation, support and guidance of several dignitaries. I

    would like to acknowledge and extend my heartfelt gratitude to the following people whohave made the completion of this project possible.

    I express my sincere gratitude to the ITM Business School for giving me the opportunity of

    working in one of the most reputed telecom organisation in India as part of my Industry

    internship Project. I would like to acknowledge Prof. Arpita Pandey, faculty guide at ITM

    Business school under whose supervision I was able to perform a decent work.

    I would like to thank my mentor, Mr. Vijesh Bhatnagar Designation Data Retail Area

    Manager Dept. Sales, for guiding me right from the inception till the successful completion

    of the project. I sincerely acknowledge him for extending his valuable guidance, support for

    literature, critical reviews of project and the report and above all the moral support he had

    provided to me with all stages of this project. Without his active support this project would

    not have been a success.

    I would also like to thank the whole Sales and Marketing Department also H R

    Department, for their help and cooperation throughout project.

  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Iip

    3/101

    I connect Final Report

    Certificate from Company

  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Iip

    4/101

  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Iip

    5/101

    I connect Final Report

    Executive Summary

    It is no wonder that in todays aggressive business environment, the challenges of sustainingin these competitive surroundings, preoccupies the minds of many Business leaders.

    Customers have many options to choose their telecom operator from competitive market.

    Furthermore, they often perceive that what they are purchasing is, for all practical purposes, a

    commodity that can be easily obtained from other companies, if need be. So, how does a

    corporation distinguish itself in a highly commoditized and competitive market? Todays

    business is more dependent, than ever before, on their top performing product which provide

    services that differentiate a company from its fierce competitors. In other words, corporations

    rely upon their product and human assets to survive and thrive. So here comes the need of

    channel management to showcase their products better than their competitors.

    Retailers are traders who buy goods from wholesalers or distributors or sometimes directly

    from producers and sell them to consumers. They generally operate through a retail outlet and

    sell to the end consumers. Since the retailers are the last point in the distribution channel, they

    see the reaction of the consumers firsthand and know their requirement more than anyone

    else knows. Because telecom retailing is not exclusive and a variety of competitive brands are

    available in the same outlet hence it is important that the company is in constant mode to

    satisfy the retailers through flawless support service. This will in turn make the retailers take

    interest to pass positive feedbacks to the consumers and impact decision-making process of

    end consumers. Recommendations from the retailers are the final step in sealing sales not

    only in telecom industry but also in many other industries. Retailers have potential to affect

    change in the consumption pattern of the consumers for consumers rely heavily on

    recommendations made by the sales men on product quality. Customers cross check the

    opinions of other customers through the retailers. Retailers can significantly affect change to

    consumer decision making, as they are located in key position between suppliers and

    consumers. On one hand being in direct contact with the consumers they exert influence on

    consumers through their counter salesperson, and on the other hand,

    They reach out to suppliers and gain advantage based on their strength and capacity to reach

    out to customers. In a way, they act as gatekeepers, determining which brands are to be

    offered and how they should be marketed. The volume of sales depends on the efficiency of a

    retailer who assesses the psychology of consumers and takes appropriate steps to sell a

  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Iip

    6/101

    I connect Final Report

    product. Understanding the importance of service support to execute sales at the retailers

    level, this study aims to find out the sales support offered by MTS to its retailers and the

    perspectives of the retailers on the same.

    Most of the research in this area suggests that a channel members satisfaction increases with

    long term orientation and continuity and reduces conflict. This means that organizations

    which aim to do business in a profitable manner today, must not only remain focused on the

    subject of customer satisfaction but also on its channel domain i.e. its channel members. This

    project takes the same direction of applying most of the channel relationship satisfaction

    research on the specific case of MTS, so that the organization benefits from the research in

    real world.

  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Iip

    7/101

  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Iip

    8/101

    I connect Final Report

    LIST OF FIGURES

    S. No. TOPIC PAGE NO.

    Fig. 1 Market Share of Fixed Line Service Providers 3

    Fig. 2 Market Share of Wireless Operators 3

    Fig. 3 Market Share of Wireless CDMA Operators 4

    Fig. 4 Market Share of GSM Operators 5

    Fig. 5 Evolution of Technology 6

    Fig. 6 Market Share of Telecom Service Providers 7

    Fig. 7 Company Structure 12

    Fig. 8 Marketing Department Verticals 13

    Fig. 9 Channel Structure 24

    Fig. 10 Sales Structure 24

  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Iip

    9/101

    I connect Final Report

    1

    1. Objectives

    Main Objectives of training period are:

    1. To study the various tariffs charged by MTS on its data products and hence to study

    the schemes and services provided by MTS.

    2. To analyse the retailers perception towards MTS and its competitors.

    3. To understand the awareness of MTS data products among retailers in the market.

    4. To create interest as well as find out the potential new retail outlets.

    5. To know the satisfaction level of Retailers towards MTS products and services.

    6. To Increase the customer base and improve in retailers satisfaction level.

  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Iip

    10/101

    I connect Final Report

    2

    2.Introduction to Industry

    The Indian telecommunications industry is one of the fastest growing in the world.

    Government policies and regulatory framework implemented by Telecom RegulatoryAuthority of India (TRAI) have provided a conducive environment for service providers.

    This has made the sector more competitive, while enhancing the accessibility of

    telecommunication services at affordable tariffs to the consumers. In the last two decades, the

    Indian Telecom Sector and mobile telephony in particular has caught the imagination of India

    by revolutionizing the way we communicate, share information; and through its staggering

    growth helped millions stay connected. This growth, however, has and continues to be at the

    cost of the Climate, powered by an unsustainable and inefficient model of energy generation

    and usage. Simultaneously, this growth has also come at significant and growing loss to the

    state exchequer, raising fundamental questions on the future business and operation model of

    the Telecom sector.

    The telecom industry has witnessed significant growth in subscriber base over the last

    decade, with increasing network coverage and a competition-induced decline in tariffs acting

    as catalysts for the growth in subscriber base. The growth story and the potential have also

    served to attract newer players in the industry, with the result that the intensity of competition

    has kept increasing.

    The Indian Telecom Industry services are not confined to basic telephone but it also extends

    to internet, broadband (both wireless and fixed), cable TV, SMS, IPTV, soft switches etc.

    The bottlenecks for Indian Telecom Industry are: Slow reform Process, Low- penetration.

    Service providers bears huge initial cost to make inroads and achieving break-even isdifficult .Huge initial investments, Limited spectrum availability and interconnection charges

    between the private and state operators.

    Evolution of Telecom Industry:

    Telecommunications was first introduced in India in 1851 when the first operational land

    lines were laid by the government near Kolkata, although telephone services were formally

    introduced in India much later in 1881. Further, in 1883, telephone services were mergedwith the postal system. In 1947, after India attained independence, all foreign

    telecommunication companies were nationalized to form the Posts, Telephone and Telegraph

    (PTT), a body that was governed by the Ministry of Communication. The Indian telecom

    sector was entirely under government ownership until 1984, when the private sector was

    allowed in telecommunication equipment manufacturing only.

    Classification of Telephony Services:

    Fixed Telephony :

  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Iip

    11/101

    I connect Final Report

    3

    Until the New Telecom Policy was announced in 1999, only BSNL and MTNL were

    allowed to provide land line phones, with MTNL operating in Delhi and Mumbai and

    BSNL catering all others parts of country. But now many other wire line operators like

    Tata, reliance, Sistema (MTS), Airtel have entered into the Indian market, with MTS

    being a crucial part of the wire line sector especially in some parts of the country likeRajasthan. The market share of different land line providers are:

    Figure 1: Market Share of Fixed Line Providers; Source: http://en.wikipedia.org

    Mobile Telephony:

    The Mobile telecommunications system in India is the second largest in the world with a

    customer base of around 929 Million subscribers and it was made open to private players inthe 1990s. GSM technology had a share of 80% of the mobile subscriber market, while

    CDMA stabilized its market share at 20%. The mobile market was continuing to expand at an

    annual rate in excess of 40% coming into 2010.According to data provided by Minister of

    State for Communications and IT Milind Deora, as of 30 November 2012, India has

    7,36,654 base transceiver stations (2G GSM & CDMA, and 3G). Of those, 96,212 base

    transceiver stations provide 3G mobile and data services. Out of India's 640 districts, 610

    districts are covered by 3G services as of 30 November 2012.The market share of various

    players in mobile services are:

    Figure 2: Market Share of Wireless operators; Source: http://en.wikipedia.org

  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Iip

    12/101

    I connect Final Report

    4

    Technological Overview:

    CDMA

    CDMA (Code-Division Multiple Access) refers to any of several protocols used in so-

    called second-generation (2G) and third-generation (3G)wireless communications.

    As the term implies, CDMA is a form of multiplexing, which allows numerous

    signals to occupy a single transmission channel, optimizing the use of

    available bandwidth. The technology is used in ultra-high-frequency (UHF)cellular

    telephone systems in the 800-MHz and 1.9-GHz bands. CDMA employs analog -to-

    digital conversion (ADC) in combination with spread spectrum technology. Audio

    input is first digitized into binary elements. The frequency of the transmitted signal is

    then made to vary according to a defined pattern (code), so it can be intercepted only

    by a receiver whose frequency response is programmed with the same code, so it

    follows exactly along with the transmitter frequency. There are trillions of possiblefrequency-sequencing codes, which enhances privacy and makes cloning difficult.

    Figure 3: Market Share of Wireless CDMA Operators; Source: http://telecomuncovered.com

    GSM

    GSM (Global System for Mobile Communications, originally Groupe Spcial Mobile), is a

    standard set developed by the European Telecommunications Standards Institute (ETSI) to

    describe protocols for second generation (2G) digital cellular networks used by mobile

    phones. It became the de facto global standard for mobile communications with over 80%

    market share. The GSM standard was developed as a replacement for first generation (1G)

    analog cellular networks, and originally described a digital, circuit switched network

    optimized for full duplex voice telephony. This was expanded over time to include data

    communications, first by circuit switched transport, then packet data transport

    via GPRS (General Packet Radio Services) and EDGE (Enhanced Data rates for GSM

    Evolution or EGPRS).Further improvements were made when the 3GPP developed third

    generation (3G) UMTS standards followed by fourth generation (4G) LTE Advanced

    standards. In 2000, the first commercial GPRS services were launched and the first GPRScompatible handsets became available for sale. In 2001 the first UMTS (W-CDMA) network

    http://searchtelecom.techtarget.com/definition/3Ghttp://searchnetworking.techtarget.com/definition/UHFhttp://searchnetworking.techtarget.com/definition/UHFhttp://searchtelecom.techtarget.com/definition/3G
  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Iip

    13/101

    I connect Final Report

    5

    was launched and worldwide GSM subscribers exceeded 500 million. In 2002 the first

    multimedia messaging services (MMS) were introduced and the first GSM network in the

    800 MHz frequency band became operational. EDGE services first became operational in a

    network in 2003 and the number of worldwide GSM subscribers exceeded 1 billion in 2004.

    By 2005, GSM networks accounted for more than 75% of the worldwide cellular networkmarket, serving 1.5 billion subscribers. In 2005, the first HSDPA capable network also

    became operational. The first HSUPA network was launched in 2007 and worldwide GSM

    subscribers exceeded two billion in 2008.

    Figure 4: Market Share of GSM Operators; Source: http://www.nextbigwhat.com/gsm-market-share-in-india

    EVOLUTION OF WIRELESS TELEPHONE TECHNOLOGY:

    2G:

    2G (or 2-G) is a short form for second-generation wireless telephone technology. Second

    generation 2G cellular telecom networks were commercially launched on the GSM standard

    in Finland. Three primary benefits of 2G networks over their predecessors were that phone

    conversations were digitally encrypted; 2G systems were significantly more efficient on the

    spectrum allowing for far greater mobile phone penetration levels; and 2G introduced data

    services for mobile, starting with SMS text messages. 2G technologies enabled the various

    mobile phone networks to provide the services such as text messages, picture messages and

    MMS (multimedia messages). 2G technology is more efficient. 2G technology holds

    sufficient security for both the sender and the receiver. All text messages are digitallyencrypted. This digital encryption allows for the transfer of data in such a way that only the

    intended receiver can receive and read it. The radio signals on 1G networks are analog, while

    the radio signals on 2G networks are digital.

    2.5G (GPRS):

    2.5G ("second and a half generation") is used to describe 2G-systems that have implemented

    a packet-switched domain in addition to the circuit-switched domain. It does not necessarily

    provide faster services because bundling of timeslots is used for circuit-switched data

    services (HSCSD) as well. The first major step in the evolution of GSM networks to 3G

    occurred with the introduction of General Packet Radio Service (GPRS)

  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Iip

    14/101

    I connect Final Report

    6

    2.75G (EDGE)

    GPRS1 networks evolved to EDGE networks with the introduction of 8PSK encoding.

    Enhanced Data rates for GSM Evolution (EDGE), Enhanced GPRS (EGPRS), or IMT Single

    Carrier (IMT-SC) is a backward-compatible digital mobile phone technology that allows

    improved data transmission rates, as an extension on top of standard GSM. EDGE wasdeployed on GSM networks beginning in 2003.

    3G:

    3G, short for third Generation, is the third generation of mobile telecommunications

    technology. 3G telecommunication networks support services that provide an information

    transfer rate of at least 200 Kbit/s. However, many services advertised as 3G provide higher

    speed than the minimum technical requirements for a 3G service. Recent 3G releases often

    denoted 3.5G and 3.75G, also provide mobile broadband access of several Mbit/s to smart

    phones and mobile modems in laptop computers 3G is the latest mobile technology and is

    now the fastest growing host among mobile units and handsets. 3G provides you with the

    highest speed possible, compared to other technologies before it. It also gives you high

    degree of connectivity and higher networking, plus resistance to noise. The technology has

    enhanced the bit rate, allowing service providers to give high speed internet facilities, higher

    call volumes and host of the multimedia applications that can be given to the customers.

    4G:

    4G, short for fourth generation, is the fourth generation of mobile telecommunications

    technology, succeeding 3G. A 4G system, in addition to the usual voice and other services of

    3G, provides mobile ultra-broadband Internet access, for example to laptopswith USB wireless modems, to Smartphone, and to other mobile devices. Even though 4G is

    a successor technology of 3G, there can be signification issues on 3G network to upgrade to

    4G as many of them were not built on forward compatibility. Conceivable applications

    include amended mobile web access, IP telephony, gaming services, high-definition mobile

    TV, video conferencing, 3D television, and cloud computing.

    Figure 5: Evolution of technology

    Telecom Regulatory Authority of India

    The Telecommunications Regulatory Authority of India or TRAI (established 1997) is the

    independent regulator established by the Government of India to regulate the

    telecommunications business in India. The mission of Telecom Regulatory Authority of India

    (TRAI) is to ensure that the interests of consumers are protected and at the same time to

    nurture conditions for growth of telecommunications, broadcasting and cable services in a

    1G 2G2.5 G

    (GPRS)

    2.75 G

    ( EDGE)3G 4G

  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Iip

    15/101

  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Iip

    16/101

    I connect Final Report

    8

    3. About Organization

    SISTEMA SHYAM TELESERVICES

    Sistema Shyam TeleServices Ltd (SSTL) is the fastest growing telecom company in the

    competitive Indian market, with over 10 million voice subscribers and over 6 lakh mobile

    broadband customers. SSTL has tied up with Mobile TeleSystems OJSC, a JSFC Sistema

    company of Russia, to bring the globally acclaimed telecom brandMTS to India. MTS isthe 8th largest telecom brand in the world. Millward Brown in its yearly listing of top 100

    brands, recently voted MTS as the 72nd most powerful brand globally.

    SSTL is a joint venture company between Sistema {LSE-SSA} of Russia and Shyam Group

    of India. Sistema is the majority share holder in this joint venture with a 73.710% equity

    stake, along with the Shyam Group, holding a 23.792% stake and the remaining 2.498%

    being held by the public. In a recent development, the Russian Government has picked upapproximately 17% stake in SSTL for US$ 600 million.

    Key Acknowledgement & Milestones

    In April 2010, Sistema JSFC has been recognized as the Best Russian Company of2009 operating in India.

    MTS, the mobile telecom service brand of SSTL, has over 10 million customersinIndia.

    MBlaze, the high-speed mobile broadband service, launched in November 2009 has

    clocked over 600,000 satisfied mobile broadband customers in a very short span oftime.

    SSTL was the FIRST telecom company in India to launch mobile broadband internet services

    with speeds up to 3.1 Mbps in the state of Jharkhand in April 2010.Recently Telecom

    Regulatory Authority of India (Indias APEX Telecom Regulatory Body) recognized MTSfor having one of the highest percentage of satisfied customers for Network Performance. In

    May 2010, renowned industry body CMAI, Association of India awarded MTS the National

    Telecom Award for being the Fastest Growing Data Operator.In February 2011, MTS India

    was recognized at the World HRD Congress for

    Best HR Practices Award in Reward & Recognition Strategies

    Best Overall Recruiting & Staffing Organization

    MTS Brand

    MTS is the global telecom brand of Mobile TeleSystems (MTS) OJSC (NYSE: MBT) of

    Russia. In December 2008, Sistema Shyam TeleServices Ltd, a joint venture between

    Sistema (LSE-SSA) of Russia and Shyam Group of India, brought the MTS brand into Indiaunder a brand license agreement with Mobile TeleSystems (MTS) OJSC. This extended the

  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Iip

    17/101

    I connect Final Report

    9

    brand of MTS beyond the CIS. The MTS brand is one of the most recognized in the

    world. The latest rankings from Millward Brown Optimor features the MTS brand as the

    72nd most powerful brand globally with a value of $9.7 billion. In 2008, MTS became the

    first and only Russian brand to enter BRANDZ Top 100 Most Powerful Brands, a ranking

    published by the Financial Times and Millward Brown. Brand MTS was launched in 2006 inRussia and got built based on its reputation as the leading telecommunication group offering

    world class telecom services in Russia, Eastern Europe and Central Asia.

    In India, brand MTS offers voice & data services to over 10 million subscribers and operates

    across all 9 telecom circles of India.

    MTS launched the high-speed mobile broadband service, MBlaze, in November 2009 and has

    seen tremendous market acceptance with over 5 lakh satisfied mobile broadband customers.

    The high speed mobile broadband service has been made available in more than 130 towns

    (Including all Metros) across the country. In April 2010, MTS is also credited to havelaunched its LIVE TV and Video on demand service, aptly called MTS TV for all MBlaze

    customers.

    History

    MTS was established in October 1993 by Moscow City Telephone Network (MGTS), T-

    Mobile Deutschland GmbH (T-Mobile), an affiliate of Deutsche Telekom AG, Siemens AG

    (Siemens) and several other shareholders. In late 1996, Sistema JSFC acquired a majority

    stake in MTS and has remained the primary owner ever since.MTS was the first company to

    launch GSM services in the Moscow region in 1994. In subsequent years, MTS has expandedrapidly in Russia largely through the acquisition of smaller independent players and became

    the leading national mobile operator.MTS initiated its international expansion in 2002

    through the establishment of Mobile TeleSystems LLC, a joint venture with Beltelecom, the

    national fixed line operator in Belarus.

    In 2003, MTS continued to expand in the CIS by acquiring the leading operator UMC in

    Ukraine, the biggest CIS market outside of Russia.

    MTS entered Central Asia in 2004 through the acquisition of the leading mobile phone

    operator in Uzbekistan, Uzdunrobita. In June 2005, the Company acquired BarashCommunications Technologies, Inc., the number one operator in Turkmenistan.

    In September 2007, MTS continued its international expansion through the acquisition of the

    leading mobile operator in Armenia, K-Telecom.

    In December 2008, MTS started to expose its brand outside the CIS borders. MTS and

    Shyam Telelink Limited, JSFC Sistema's telecommunications subsidiary in India, announces

    the agreement to allow Shyam Telelink to use MTS brand in India. The decision to introduce

    the brand to India is reflective of thebrands success in the Companys markets of operationsince its launch in May 2006. In April 2008, MTS brand was recognized as one of the

  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Iip

    18/101

  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Iip

    19/101

    I connect Final Report

    11

    telecom services to over 10 million wireless subscribers including more than 1million HighSpeed Mobile Broadband customers in over 450 towns across the country. MTS is wellrecognized in India and worldwide for its commitment to high quality and innovative telecomsolutions. It is focused on creating a strong portfolio of smart phones catering to customersacross various segments. The companys objective is to leverage the advancements inInformation & Communication Technologies (ICT) to contribute towards progressive socio-economic change, especially in the fields of Health and Education.

    At its peak, MTS operated services in 21 out of 22 telecom circles of India. However, MTS

    has shut services in 13 circles and currently operates in 9 circles.

    Delhi

    Gujarat

    Karnataka

    Kerala

    Kolkata

    Rajasthan

    Tamil Nadu

    Uttar Pradesh (West) (includes Uttarkhand)

    West Bengal (includes Sikkim and Andaman and Nicobar Islands)

    Market Structure

    Company has acquired three carriers in eight circles and in total continued development in

    the nine most economically attractive Indian regions: Rajasthan, Delhi, Gujarat, Uttar

    Pradesh (West), Kolkata, West Bengal, Kerala, Tamil Nadu, and Karnataka. It managed to

    revive revenue growth in the last quarter of 2013, showing a 7.4% quarter-on-quarter

    increase, and shifted its focus back to business expansion and development. The company's

    subscriber base grew by 2.2% in the last quarter, while its data customer base increased by

    10.7%. Subscribers monthly minutes of usage also increased by 39.5% to 373 minutes.Blended mobile ARPU grew by 22.8% in local currency, while non-voice revenues from data

    and value-added services accounted for 34.7% of total revenue in 2013.

    In October, having secured new licenses and three carriers from the nine above-mentioned

    circles, it has launched the EVDO Rev.B Phase 2 high-speed data transfer services, offering

    an access speed of up to 9.8 Mb/sec and the highest quality available in the market to date.

  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Iip

    20/101

    I connect Final Report

    12

    Company Structure

    Figure 7: Company Structure

    CEO

    (Country level)

    CXO

    (Department

    Wise)

    COO (Circle)

    HOD

    (Finance)

    HOD

    (Sales)

    HOD

    (Marketing)

    Vertical Head

    (DATA)

    Vertical Head

    (Voice)

    Operational

    level

    Operational

    Level

    Operational

    Level

    Vertical Head

    (VAS)

    Vertical head

    (Wireline)

    Vertical Head

    (Smartphone)

    HOD

    (Vigilance)

    HOD

    (CSD)

  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Iip

    21/101

    I connect Final Report

    13

    Marketing Department MTS:

    Marketing department at MTS is divided into five separate verticals which are

    Figure 8: Marketing Department verticals

    MTS the giant telecom company is divided into five major segments known as circles.

    VOICEcircle focuses on the voice or calling facility provided by the company. Voice

    can be divided into GSM and CDMA segments. MTS works on CDMA segment of

    voice. Its major competitors in the field are Reliance and DoCoMo. Out of 22 circlesMTS works in 9 circles. Voice deals with two main verticals- Acquisition, which is

    through retailer and another is UNR, which is focused on existing customer base.

    DATA circle can be segregated into Acquisition and UNR, which can further be

    divided into postpaid and prepaid. Data circle consists of various products like wifis, dongles, blazers etc. The main technologies adopted by MTS for its data centric

    products are 1X, REV A and REV B. 1X is no more a part of the MTS data circle as

    its speed is now enhanced in form of the other two technologies. REV B is the most

    preferred one as it works both as a Wi-Fi as well as a dongle with a high speed of 9.8

    Mbps. SMARTPHONE circle consists of various phones provided by the company. With

    the success of the android phones all across the globe, MTS has recently launched

    Canvas Blaze which is designed by Micromax with special features like additional

    sim slot for the existing GSM sim with the customers, 5 inch touchscreen, Mblaze and

    with a storage capacity of 32 GB. The company majorly focuses on this circle in

    accordance with the market conditions and consumer needs.

    WIRELINE creates a niche market in the telecom segment as the major focus

    nowadays is on the smartphones. MTS stands as a market leader for the wire line

    services in Rajasthan. It provides High-speed data transmission over wire line

    Marketing

    Department

    VOICE

    DATA

    SMART

    PHONE

    WIRELINE

    MARCOM

  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Iip

    22/101

    I connect Final Report

    14

    phone.MTS has an extensive fiber optic Network in Rajasthan, with only the last mile

    laid in copper. This ensures practically fault free and enhanced quality of services:

    -Superior voice quality-Host of value added services-Bouquet of differential services ease of payment

    MARCOM deals with market communication efficacy and also various methods of

    communications. Marcom is another name for branding, whose prime component is

    advertisement i.e, science of arresting the human intelligence just long enough to get

    money from it. Marcom is broadly classified as ATL (Above the line) and BTL

    (Below the line). ATL consists of print ads, radio, creative financing, outdoor etc.,

    whereas BTL consists of posters, leaflets, flanges etc.

    Mission, Vision, Values and Objectives

    Mission: MTS customers can actively shape their lives anytime and anywhere with therange of innovative telecom products and services. We offer people greater choice andinspiration in how they spend their valuable assets: their time and energy.

    VISION:We empower people to pursue their purpose in modern networked world. MTSshares common values with people who know what they want to achieve in their lives and are

    full of energy to hit their goals.

    Values:

    Inspiration to be a doer.

    Delivering excellence

    Entrepreneurial spirits

    Mutuality

    Objectives and strategies: Main objective of the company is to increase the Average

    Revenue and decrease the loss on year on year basis. Strategy is focussing on accelerating

    development of its data services and promoting smart phones, with maximised monetisationof voice services.

    Major Competitors:

    Telecom Industry is one of the fastest growing industries in India. Following telecom

    operators are the major players in telecom Industry in India.

    1. Bharti Airtel

    2. Idea Cellular

    3. Vodafone.

  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Iip

    23/101

    I connect Final Report

    15

    4. Tata Docomo

    5. BSNL

    6. Reliance

    7. Aircel

    Recent Trends in SSTL

    1. Government priced 800 MHz spectrum at 65% of the price of 1800 MHz spectrum.

    2. It uses non-contiguous CDMA spectrum in the 800 MHz band. In march 2013, DOT has

    fix the reserve price of a pan India. 5 MHz block of airways in 800 MHz band at Rs 9100 cr.

    3. It is observed that prepaid base is better than the postpaid base in MTS.

    4. MTS has upgraded the network to Rev B phase 2 technologies by both software as well as

    hardware. The speed has been optimized to the level of 9.8 Mbps.

    5. The company has allocated 2 channels exclusively in all circles.

    6. The company has enhanced its portfolio of smartphones and launched Rev B Mifi dongle

    which connect 5 devices at a time. Till now Mifi dongle have been launched by TATA only.

    7. Presently 25-30% of the voice retailers are data service enablers which have to increased to

    60-70%.

    8. On 3 Oct 2013, SSTL got its unified telecom license valid for 20 years. Itll providetechnology neutral telecom services for a period of 20 years in 8 circles.

  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Iip

    24/101

    I connect Final Report

    16

    4. PRODUCT/ SERVICE OFFERINGS:

    MTS offers both prepaid and post paid services in all verticals. MTS offer following types of

    data Products:-

    I. MTS MBlaze Ultra- 9.8 MBPS

    II. MTS MBlaze- 3.1 Mbps

    III. MTS WIFI- 9.8 Mbps

    MTS MBlaze Ultra

    Features-

    MTUltra High Speed Internet for broadband mobility - 3 times faster than MTSMblaze

    Dual-Band 800/1900MHz

    Plug and Play

    Downlink speeds upto 9.8Mbps

    Dual Antenna for greater receive diversity

    M-ULTRA Prepaid Portfolio

    M-Ultra Retail Prepaid FRC

    Base Plan:Validity: 2 years, Base Tariff: Rs 1/MB

    FRC Details:

    MRP Bundled Usage Validity Extra Usage

    Rs. 240

    Unlimited access to

    Facebook + Twitter + Linkedin& 6

    GB

    30 days Re 1/MB

  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Iip

    25/101

    I connect Final Report

    17

    New M-Ultra Retail Prepaid STVs Portfolio

    STV

    MRPs

    (Rs.)

    Bundled Usage

    Validity

    (in

    days)

    Extra

    Usage

    Charges

    *Speeds

    134 1 GB Unlimited*1 day

    (24hrs.)NA

    Upto 1 GB- 9.8 Mbps, 1 GB to 4

    GB - 144kbps, 4 GB onwards - 64

    kbps

    339 2 GB Unlimited* 7 NA

    Upto 2 GB- 9.8 Mbps, 2 GB to 6

    GB- 144kbps, 6 GB onwards -64

    kbps

    303 1 GB 30 Re.1/MB Limited Usage Product

    450 2 GB 30 Re.1/MB Limited Usage Product

    590 3 GB 30 Re.1/MB Limited Usage Product

    747

    4 GB and Unlimited access

    to

    Facebook + Twitter +

    Linkedin*

    30 Re.1/MB Limited Usage Product

    898 5 GB Unlimited* 30 NA

    Upto 5 GB -9.8 Mbps, 5 GB to 8

    GB- 144kbps, 8 GB onwards- 64

    kbps

    1199 10 GB Unlimited* 30 NA

    Upto 10 GB-9.8 Mbps, 10 GB to

    16 GB- 144kbps, 16 GB onwards-

    64 kbps

    1498 15 GB Unlimited* 30 NA

    Upto 15 GB-9.8 Mbps, 15 GB to

    20 GB- 144kbps, 20 GB onwards-

    64 kbps

    M-Ultra Top Ups:

    Only top ups >Rs 50 will be valid.

    MRP (Rs.) Talk Time (Rs.)

    50 41.50

    100 86.00

  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Iip

    26/101

    I connect Final Report

    18

    110 97.90

    200 175.00

    220 195.80

    250 222.50

    300 267.00

    400 356.00

    500 445.00

    1000 890.00

    MTS MBLAZE

    Features:

    Plug and Play Enabled Speed up to 3.1 Mbps

    Fastest uploads at a speed to up to 1.8 Mbps

    Micro SD Card slot for data storage

    MBLAZE Prepaid Portfolio

    MBlaze Retail Prepaid FRCs

    Base Plan:Validity: 2 years, Base Tariff: Rs 1/MB

    FRC Details:

    MRP Bundled Usage Validity Extra Usage

    Rs. 220

    Unlimited access to

    Facebook + Twitter + Linkedin&6

    GB

    30 days Re 1/MB

  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Iip

    27/101

    I connect Final Report

    19

    New MBlaze Retail Prepaid STVs Portfolio

    SegmentsSTV

    MRPs

    Usage and Validity

    UsageValidity

    in days

    Extra

    Usage

    *Speeds

    Short

    Validity

    STVs

    Rs.96 1 GB Unlimited*24

    hoursNA

    Upto 1 GB - 3.1 Mbps, 1

    GB to 4GB- 144 kbps, >4

    GB - 64 kbps

    Rs.298 2 GB Unlimited* 7 NA

    Upto2 GB - 3.1 Mbps, 2

    GB to 6GB- 144 kbps, >6

    GB - 64 kbps

    Rs.179 2 GB Unlimited* 3 NA

    Upto 2GB - 3.1 Mbps,

    2GB to 4GB- 144kbps,> 4

    GB - 64 kbps

    Rs.225 2 GB Unlimited* 5 NA

    Upto 2GB - 3.1 Mbps,

    2GB to 4GB- 144kbps, >4

    GB - 64 kbps

    Rs.379 3 GB Unlimited* 10 NA

    Upto 3GB - 3.1 Mbps,

    3GB to 5GB- 144kbps,>5

    GB- 64 kbps

    Rs.449 4 GB Unlimited* 15 NA

    Upto 4GB - 3.1

    Mbps,4GB to 6GB-

    144kbps,>6 GB - 64 kbps

    Low

    Usage

    STVs

    Rs.198 750 MB 30 Re.1/MB Limited Usage Product

    Rs.248 1GB 30 Re.1/MB Limited Usage Product

    Rs.375 2 GB 30 Re.1/MB Limited Usage Product

    Rs.490 3GB 30 Re.1/MB Limited Usage Product

    Social

    Media

    STVsRs.647

    Unlimited access to

    Facebook +

    Twitter +

    Linkedin&4 GB

    30 Re.1/MB Limited Usage Product

    High

    Usage

    STVs

    Rs.798 5 GB Unlimited* 30 NA

    Upto 5GB - 3.1 Mbps,

    5GB to 10GB-

    144kbps,>10 GB- 64 kbps

  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Iip

    28/101

    I connect Final Report

    20

    Rs.999 12 GB Unlimited* 30 NA

    Upto 12GB - 3.1 Mbps,

    12GB to15GB-

    144kbps,>15 GB- 64 kbps

    Rs.1298 15 GB Unlimited* 30 NA Upto 15GB - 3.1 Mbps,15GB to 20GB-

    144kbps,>20 GB- 64 kbps

    Long

    Validity

    STVs

    Rs.698 4 GB 60 Re.1/MB Limited Usage Product

    Rs.998 6 GB 90 Re.1/MB Limited Usage Product

    Rs.1499 15 GB 90 Re.1/MB Limited Usage Product

    Rs.39906 GB

    /MonthUnlimited* 180 NA

    Upto 6 GB - 3.1 Mbps, 6

    GB to 10 GB- 144 kbps, >10 GB - 64 kbps

    Exclusive Web Recharges:

    Exclusive Web

    Recharges

    STV

    MRPs

    Usage and Validity

    Bundled

    Usage

    Validity

    in days

    Extra

    Usage*Speed

    Available on

    web onlyRs.818

    7 GB

    Unlimited*30 Days N/A

    Upto 7 GB usage @

    3.1 Mbps, Above 7 GB

    @ 144 kbps

    Available on

    web onlyRs.1010

    13 GB

    Unlimited*30 Days N/A

    Upto 13 GB usage @

    3.1 Mbps, Above 13

    GB @ 144 kbps

    Available on

    web only Rs.133017 GB

    Unlimited* 30 Days N/A

    Upto 17 GB usage @

    3.1 Mbps, Above 17GB @ 144 kbps

    MBlaze Top Ups:

    Only top ups >Rs 50 will be valid.

    MRP (Rs.) Talk Time (Rs.)

    50 41.50

    100 86.00

  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Iip

    29/101

    I connect Final Report

    21

    110 97.90

    200 175.00

    220 195.80

    250 222.50

    300 267.00

    400 356.00

    500 445.00

    1000 890.00

    MTS WIFI

    Features:

    3GPlus Upto 9.8 Mbps 5 Wifi-enabled Devices - Smartphone, Laptop, Tablets, Works with Laptop USB, Car Charger and Travel Charger Plug and Play

    MTS WIFI Prepaid Portfolio

  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Iip

    30/101

    I connect Final Report

    22

    MTS WIFI Postpaid Portfolio

  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Iip

    31/101

    I connect Final Report

    23

    5. Distribution Procedure and Sales Force

    MTS distribution channel:

    Distribution procedure and Margins:

    Airtel directly supply its products to the distributors in Urban Areas through TM.

    Territory Manager distributes the products as per demand TO individual distributors,

    which is scheduled as per the target for the territory.

    The Margin for the Distributor is 5%.

    Distributor distributes the products to the FOSs. Their job is to supply those products

    to the Retailers. The Retailers margin is 2%

    ZBM on the basis of sales achieved above target provides spurts (schemes) to the

    Distributors hence in reality margin may cross 5% sometimes.

    Stock system in distribution:

    The complete stock maintenance procedure is categorically divided in two parts.

    1. Stock to be maintained by Distributor2. Stock to be maintained by Retailer

    In the case of Distributor:

    The distributor has to keep the LAPU balance for minimum 7 days; Here 35% of the value

    must be in RCV.

    In the case of Retailer:

    The retailer has to keep LAPU balance for 3 days (minimum amount Rs.1500); Here 33% of

    the value must be in RCV.

    (The FOS visits each Outlet in alternative days whether there is any shortage of product or

    not. The supply system of MTS is so strong that a retailer will never go with shortage of

    product. It is also a compulsory task for each FOS to go and to ask Retailers whether there is

    any shortage of product, once in every 2 days.)

  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Iip

    32/101

  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Iip

    33/101

    I connect Final Report

    25

    MTS also control the sales force because they know the importance of control system in

    organization. MTS use these four steps to decide their sales force and at each step they check

    whether the process is followed within the policies of the organization. Hence we can clearly

    see the difference between MTS sales growth and its competitors.TeleCompass-

    TeleCompass (TC) is a system that automatically records all the stages in a sales process.

    This includes a contact management system which tracks all the transactions that has been

    made with a given customer, the purpose of the transaction.

    What to get-

    Ensures that your sales effort doesnt get duplicated thereby eliminating the risk. It eases the

    work for Audit department.

    It is fully integrated in all the departments that deal with customer service management.

    How it benefits MTS sales team-

    For the business: Sales team can approach the market in an organized and efficient manner.

    For the managers: They can easily monitor the performance of your work force, solve

    potential problems and make your people more proactive.

    For the sales teams: Its easier to close a deal by keeping a track of your orders, proposals and

    clients.

  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Iip

    34/101

  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Iip

    35/101

    I connect Final Report

    27

    benchmarking the same vis--vis competitors.

    Research methodology: Exploratory method.

    The main purpose of exploratory research studies is that of formulating a problem for more

    precise investigations or of developing the working hypotheses from an operational point of

    view. The major emphasis in such studies is on the discovery of ideas and insights.

    Any one of the following three methods can be used to carry out such kind of research study:

    -

    Survey of concerning literature.

    The Experience survey.

    The analysis of insight-stimulating.

    Experience survey had been used to carry out such study.

    Experience Survey:

    It means the survey of people who have had practical experience with the problem to be

    studied. The object of such a survey is to obtain insight into the relationships between

    variables and new ideas relating to the research problem. An experience survey may enablethe researcher to define the problem more concisely and help in the formulation of the

    research process. This survey may as well provide information about the practical

    possibilities of research.

    Sample Size and Method

    Sample size : 209

    Sample Method : Random Simple Sampling

    SAMPLE

    While deciding about the sample of research, it is required from the researchers point to pay

    attention to these under mentioned points:

    a) Sample Units:

  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Iip

    36/101

  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Iip

    37/101

    I connect Final Report

    29

    Questionnaire Design:

    As the questionnaire is self-administrated, the survey is kept simple and user friendly. Words

    used in the questionnaire are readily understandable to all respondents.

    Questionnaire was developed after studying the market conditions, awareness among the

    retailers and the needs and wants of the retailers.

    The parameters that are measured:

    Retailer reliability

    Customer and Retailers awareness

    Customer satisfaction

    Factor preference of the retailers to promote a particular brand.Personnel interaction:

    Face to face interaction was done in order to identify grievances of the retailers.

    Limitations of the Study

    At most attention was taken to eliminate any kind of biasness & misinterpretation in the study

    to get optimum result, even though the following limitations could have certain degree of

    impact on the findings.

    Data collected about may not represent the real picture as the sample size covered

    only 209 retailers against 8000 retailers.

    Some respondents were not willing to respond and few of them who responded were

    in hurry hence the active participation was lacking.

    As survey was conducted over phone so proper rationality towards the company and

    its services was lacking.

    Scope of the StudyBy this study, satisfaction level as well as attitude of the retailers towards MTS have been

    found out, which can be used in strategy formulation in Rajasthan region.

    Suggestions have been formulated keeping in mind the following points.

    Factors for dissatisfaction towards the company services have been studied from

    Retailer point of view which can be taken care of& improved.

    Getting an opportunity to convince & interact with the Retailers.

    Creating awareness & finding out potential Retailers for MTS.

  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Iip

    38/101

    I connect Final Report

    30

    Data Analysis and Interpretation

    Retailer Survey

    Objective 1: To know the types of Retailing Outlets.

    Activating Both Recharging Grand

    Total

    Count of Outlet Type 2 136 71 209

    2

    13 6

    71

    0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    120

    140

    160

    Activating Both Recharging

    Outlet Type for Rajasthan region

    Interpretation:

    65% of the retailing outlets have activating as well as recharging facilities hence enhancingthe visibility and accessibility to the consumers.

    Recharging outlets account for 34% while activating outlets are only 1%.

    Objective 2: To know the most selling brand

    Airce

    l

    Airte

    l

    Ide

    a

    MT

    S

    Relianc

    e

    TAT

    A

    Vodafon

    e

    Grand

    Total

    Count of Most

    selling brand

    14 89 10 54 9 17 16 209

  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Iip

    39/101

    I connect Final Report

    31

    13

    89

    10

    54

    917 16

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    70

    8090

    100

    Aircel Airtel Idea MTS Reliance TATA Vodafone

    Most Selling Brand for Rajasthan Region

    Interpretation:

    Airtel is the market leader with 43% followed by MTS with 26%.

    While other competitors lag behind due to poor connectivity between 6% to 8%.

    Row

    Labels

    Aircel Airtel Idea MTS Reliance TATA Vodafone Grand

    TotalJaipur 4 20 3 17 4 1 2 51

    4

    20

    17

    4

    1 2

    0

    5

    10

    15

    20

    25

    Jaipur

    Most selling brand for Jaipur

    Zone

    Aircel

    Airtel

    Idea

    MTS

    Reliance

    TATA

    Vodafone

    Interpretation:

    40% of the market is led by Airtel, while MTS covers 34%. Tata has the least market withonly 2%.

  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Iip

    40/101

    I connect Final Report

    32

    2

    14

    7

    1 1

    2

    0

    2

    4

    6

    8

    10

    12

    14

    16

    Ajmer

    Most selling brand for Ajmer Zone

    Aircel

    Airtel

    MTS

    Reliance

    TATA

    Vodafone

    Interpretation:

    In Ajmer, Airtel is the market leader with 52%, while MTS has 26%. Reliance and Tata

    equally compete with the lowest market of just 1%.

    1

    9

    1

    8

    1

    3 3

    0

    2

    4

    6

    8

    10

    Alwar

    Most selling brand for Alwar Zone

    Aircel

    Airtel

    Idea

    MTS

    Reliance

    TATA

    Vodafone

    Interpretation:

    In Alwar, Airtel and MTS are close competitors with 35% and 31% respectively.

    Row

    Labels

    Aircel Airtel MTS Reliance TATA Vodafone Grand

    Total

    Ajmer 2 14 7 1 1 2 27

    RowLabels

    Aircel Airtel Idea MTS Reliance TATA Vodafone GrandTotal

    Alwar 1 9 1 8 1 3 3 26

  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Iip

    41/101

  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Iip

    42/101

    I connect Final Report

    34

    Row Labels Aircel Airtel Idea MTS TATA Vodafone Grand

    Total

    Kota 1 9 4 7 4 1 26

    1

    9

    4

    7

    4

    1

    0

    2

    4

    6

    8

    10

    Kota

    Most selling brand for Kota Zone

    Aircel

    Airtel

    Idea

    MTS

    TATA

    Vodafone

    Interpretation:

    In Kota, Airtel leads the market with 35%, while MTS has 27% market presence.

    Reliance has no market in this zone.

    1

    15

    4

    1

    3 2

    0

    2

    4

    6

    8

    10

    12

    14

    16

    Udaipur

    Most selling brand for Udaipur Zone

    Aircel

    Airtel

    MTS

    Reliance

    TATA

    Vodafone

    Interpretation:

    In Udaipur, Airtel covers 58%, MTS covers just 15% due to lack of proper communication to

    the retailers. Tata has comparatively better market than other zones with 12%, while Relianceand Aircel equally compete at 4% each.

    Row Labels Aircel Airtel MTS Reliance TATA Vodafone GrandTotal

    Udaipur 1 15 4 1 3 2 26

  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Iip

    43/101

    I connect Final Report

    35

    Objective 3: To know the reason to associate with the most selling brand

    Connectivity Dealer

    Relationship

    Demand Margin Promotional

    Schemes

    Roaming Grand

    Total

    Reason to

    associate withthe most

    selling brand

    90 3 52 13 47 4 209

    90

    3

    52

    13

    47

    4

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    70

    80

    90

    100 Reason to associate with the most selling

    brand for Rajasthan region

    Interpretation:

    As surveyed, 43% of the retailers like to associate with the most selling brand because of

    excellent connectivity.

    Also due to increasing enhanced technologies, demand has increased immensely which

    further pushes 25% retailers to associate with the brands with good market.

    Telecom companies survive in the market majorly with the schemes they bring to the market.

    Hence 22% retailers like to associate with the most selling brand due to innovative schemes.

    Row

    Labels

    Connectivity Demand Margin Promotional

    Schemes

    Roaming Grand

    Total

    Jaipur 21 13 2 12 3 51

  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Iip

    44/101

  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Iip

    45/101

    I connect Final Report

    37

    8

    1

    10

    1

    6

    0

    2

    4

    68

    10

    12

    Connectivity Dealer Rel ations hip Demand Marg in Promotional

    Schemes

    Alwar

    Reason to associate with the most selling brand

    for Alwar region

    Interpretation:

    In Alwar, 38% retailers are associated with the most selling brand due to demand in the

    market, while 31% retailers due to good connectivity.

    Row Labels Connectivit

    y

    Demand Margi

    n

    Promotional

    Schemes

    Grand Total

    Bikaner 11 5 3 8 27

    11

    5

    3

    8

    0

    2

    4

    6

    8

    10

    12

    Connectivity Demand Margin Promotional Schemes

    Bikaner

    Reason to associate with the most selling brand

    for Bikaner region

    Interpretation:

    In Bikaner, 41% retailers are associated to the most selling brand due to good connectivity

    while 30% are due to good promotional schemes launched by the brands regularly.

    Row Labels Connectivit

    y

    Demand Margi

    n

    Promotiona

    l Schemes

    Roaming Gran

    d

    Total

    Jodhpur 10 4 2 9 1 26

  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Iip

    46/101

    I connect Final Report

    38

    10

    4

    2

    9

    1

    0

    2

    4

    68

    10

    12

    Connectivity Demand Margin Promotional

    Schemes

    Roaming

    Jodhpur

    Reason to associate with the most selling brand

    for Jodhpur region

    Interpretation:

    In Jodhpur, 38% retailers are associated due to good connectivity while 35% are due to good

    promotional schemes. 8% of the retailers say that they have good margin in the particularbrand which triggers them to associate with the most selling brand.

    13

    6

    2

    5

    0

    2

    4

    6

    8

    10

    12

    14

    Connectivity Demand Margin Promotional Schemes

    Kota

    Reason to associate with the most selling brand

    for Kota region

    Interpretation:

    In Kota, half of the retailersi.e 50% say that because of connectivity they would like to

    associate with the most selling brand, while 23% of them say that demand of the brand is

    high in the market

    Row

    Labels

    Connectivity Dealer

    Relationship

    Demand Margin Promotional

    Schemes

    Grand

    Total

    Udaipur 15 1 6 2 2 26

    Row Labels Connectivit

    y

    Demand Margi

    n

    Promotiona

    l Schemes

    Grand Total

    Kota 13 6 2 5 26

  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Iip

    47/101

    I connect Final Report

    39

    15

    1

    6

    2 2

    0

    5

    10

    15

    20

    Connectivity Dealer Rel ations hip Dema nd Ma rg in Promot ional

    Schemes

    Udaipur

    Reason to associate with the most selling brand

    for Kota region

    Interpretation:

    In Udaipur as well, 58% retailers like to associate with the most selling brand due to excellent

    connectivity, while 23% retailers are associated because of high market demand.

    Only 4% retailers say that due to good dealer relationship they like to associate with the

    brand.

    Objective 4: To know the monthly recharge amount collection of the most selling brand

    925

    53

    57

    45

    20

    Monthly Recharge Amount for most

    selling brand for Rajasthan region

    >60000

    10000-20000

    20000-30000

    30000-40000

    40000-50000

    50000-60000

    >60000 10000-

    20000

    20000-

    30000

    30000-

    40000

    40000-

    50000

    50000-

    60000

    Grand

    Total

    Monthly Rechargeamount of the most

    selling brand for

    Rajasthan Region

    9 25 53 57 45 20 209

  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Iip

    48/101

    I connect Final Report

    40

    Interpretation:

    27% retailers have monthly recharge collection between Rs. 30,000-40,000, while 25%

    retailers have monthly recharge collection between Rs. 20,000-30,000.

    22% have monthly collection between 40K- 50K whereas only 4% have monthly collectionover Rs. 60,000 which is due to good connectivity and high demand.

    Monthly recharge

    count

    >70 20-30 30-40 40-50 50-60 60-70 Grand Total

    3 92 70 31 10 3 209

    3

    92

    70

    31

    10 30

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    >70 20-30 30-40 40-50 50-60 60-70

    Monthly recharge count forRajasthan region

    Interpretation:

    44% retailers say they have monthly recharge count of 20-30, while 33% of them are able toattract 30-40 customers monthly. Only 1% retailers are able to attract 60-70 customersmonthly.

    Objective 5: To know the average LAPU balance of MTS with the retailers

    Row

    Labels

    >3000 1000-1500 1500-2000 2000-2500 2000-

    3000

    2500-

    3000

    Grand

    Total

    Jaipur 5 7 14 20 1 4 51

  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Iip

    49/101

    I connect Final Report

    41

    9

    48

    72

    59

    19

    1

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    70

    80

    >3000 1000-1500 1500-2000 2000-2500 2500-3000 500-1000

    Average LAPU balance for Rajasthan region

    Interpretation:

    34% retailers have monthly LAPU balance of 1500-2000, while 28% have average LAPU

    balance of 2000-2500.

    Only 4% retailers have LAPU balance above 3000 which is due to good dealer relationship

    and excellent chasing by the company.

    Objective 6: To understand the reason behind keeping average LAPU balance less than

    Rs.500

    95

    53

    4

    57

    Reason for keeping LAPU balance

    < Rs.500 (Rajasthan region)

    Less demand

    Never happened

    Recharging issues due to

    network congestion

    Service Issues(sales

    person not responding)

    Less

    demand

    Never

    happened

    Recharging

    issues due to

    network

    congestion

    Service

    Issues(sales

    person not

    responding)

    Grand

    Total

    Reason for

    LAPU Bal

  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Iip

    50/101

    I connect Final Report

    42

    Interpretation:

    45% retailers say due to less demand in the area their LAPU balance sometimes fall below

    500, while 27% retailers face service issues due to which LAPU balance reaches below

    500.They say that due to lack of regular visits by the company executives they face such

    problem. 25% retailers have never faced any problem and they always have LAPU balance

    above 500, which implies good communication between the sales executive and the retailer.

    Objective 7: To know the reason for not promoting MTS data products

    Count of

    Reason for not

    promoting

    MTS

    Lack of

    Communicatio

    n

    Less

    demand

    Less

    Promotion

    al schemes

    Low

    Margi

    n

    No

    Reaso

    n

    Gran

    d

    Total

    40 56 8 27 78 209

    40

    56

    827

    78

    Reason for not promoting MTS

    (Rajasthan region)

    Lack of Communication

    Less demand

    Less Promotional schemes

    Low Margin

    No Reason

    Interpretation:

    37% retailers are satisfied with the company services and are happy to promote MTS, while

    27% of them find less demand in the market hence not willing to promote MTS. 13%

    retailers say they have low margin in MTS services

    Row

    Labels

    Lack of

    Communication

    Less

    demand

    Less

    Promotional

    schemes

    Low

    Margin

    No

    Reaso

    n

    Gran

    d

    Total

    Jaipur 11 9 2 10 19 51

  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Iip

    51/101

    I connect Final Report

    43

    119

    210

    19

    05

    1015

    20

    Lackof

    Communicatio

    n

    Lessdemand

    Less

    Promotional

    schemes

    LowMargin

    NoReason

    Jaipur

    Reason for not promoting MTS

    (Jaipur Zone)

    Interpretation:

    In Jaipur, 22% retailers do not promote MTS due to lack of proper communication by the

    company and poor response on shortage of stock.

    Row

    Labels

    Lack of

    Communication

    Less

    demand

    Less

    Promotional

    schemes

    Low

    Margin

    No

    Reason

    Grand

    Total

    Ajmer 4 8 1 1 13 27

    4

    8

    1 1

    13

    02468

    101214

    Lackof

    Com

    municatio

    n

    Le

    ssdemand

    Less

    P

    romotional

    schemes

    L

    owMargin

    NoReason

    Ajmer

    Reason for not promoting MTS

    (Ajmer Zone)

    Interpretation:

    48% retailers are happy with the service while 30% face less demand in the area and 15% are

    dissatisfied with the untimely communication by the FOSs

    Row

    Labels

    Lack of

    Communication

    Less demand Low Margin No Reason Grand

    Total

    Alwar 5 10 2 9 26

  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Iip

    52/101

    I connect Final Report

    44

    5

    10

    2

    9

    0

    2

    4

    6

    810

    12

    Lack of

    Communication

    Less demand Low Margin No Reason

    Alwar

    Reason for not promoting MTS

    (Alwar Zone)

    Interpretation:

    38% retailers find less demand in the market while 19% of them complain that there is noproper communication by FOSs.

    Row

    Labels

    Lack of

    Communication

    Less demand Less

    Promotional

    schemes

    Low

    Margin

    No

    Reason

    Grand

    Total

    Bikaner 4 7 1 6 9 27

    4

    7

    1

    6

    9

    02468

    10

    Lackof

    Communicatio

    n

    Lessdemand

    Less

    Promotional

    schemes

    LowMargin

    NoReason

    Bikaner

    Reason for not promoting MTS(Bikaner Zone)

    Interpretation:

    22% retailers say they get fewer margins in promoting MTS while 26% retailers find less

    demand in the market hence not willing to promote MTS.

    Row

    Labels

    Lack of

    Communication

    Less

    demand

    Less

    Promotional

    schemes

    Low

    Margin

    No

    Reason

    Grand

    Total

    Jodhpur 6 6 1 3 10 26

  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Iip

    53/101

    I connect Final Report

    45

    6 61

    3

    10

    02468

    1012

    Lackof

    Communicatio

    n

    Lessdemand

    Less

    Promotional

    schemes

    LowMargin

    NoReason

    Jodhpur

    Reason for not promoting MTS

    (Jodhpur Zone)

    Interpretation:

    23% retailers find less demand in the market and improper communication as the majorreasons for not promoting MTS.

    Row Labels Lack of

    Communication

    Less

    demand

    Less

    Promotional

    schemes

    Low

    Margin

    No

    Reason

    Grand

    Total

    Kota 3 7 2 3 11 26

    3

    7

    2 3

    11

    02468

    1012

    Lackof

    Communicatio

    n

    Lessdemand

    Less

    Promotional

    schemes

    LowMargin

    NoReason

    Kota

    Reason for not promoting MTS

    (Kota Zone)

    Interpretation:

    42% retailers are happy to serve and promote MTS, while 27% find less demand in the

    market hence are not willing to promote MTS.

    Row Labels Lack of

    Communication

    Less

    demand

    Less

    Promotional

    schemes

    Low

    Margin

    No

    Reason

    Grand

    Total

    Udaipur 7 9 1 2 7 26

  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Iip

    54/101

    I connect Final Report

    46

    79

    1 2

    7

    0246

    810

    Lackof

    Communicatio

    n

    Lessdemand

    Less

    Promotional

    schemes

    LowMargin

    NoReason

    Udaipur

    Reason for not promoting MTS

    (Udaipur Zone)

    Interpretation:

    35% retailers say due to less demand they are not willing to promote MTS over market

    leading brands, while 27% retailers say they do not get proper information from FOSs hence

    lose zeal to promote MTS.

    8% retailers say they get low margin in MTS as compared to other leading brands.

    Objective 8: To know which MTS data product has maximum sell

    Count of MTS Data

    product with maxpotential

    198 248 375 490 647 798 999 Grand

    Total31 60 38 67 8 1 4 209

    31

    60

    38

    67

    8

    1 4

    MTS data product with maximum

    potential (Rajasthan Region)

    198

    248

    375

    490

    647

    798

    999

    Interpretation:

  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Iip

    55/101

    I connect Final Report

    47

    Low Usage STVs:

    32% retailers have maximum sell of STV 490 which provides 3GB for a month, while 29%

    have maximum sale of STV 248 which provides 1GB.18% retailers have maximum sale of

    STV 375 which gives 2GB per month.

    Social media STVs:

    4% retailers say they have maximum sell of STV 647 which provides unlimited access to

    Facebook + twitter+ LinkedIn and 4GB for a month.

    High Usage STVs:

    Only 2% retailers say they have maximum sell of STV 999 which provides 10GB unlimited

    access for a month.

    Objective 9: To know the time of the day when retailers get the maximum customers.

    Count of Time of the

    day you get the

    maximum recharges

    3-6pm 6-9pm 9-11pm 9-12am Grand Total

    5 87 3 114 209

    5

    87

    3

    114

    Time of the day to get maximumrecharges (Rajasthan region)

    3-6pm

    6-9pm

    9-11pm

    9-12am

    Interpretation:

    55% retailers say they get maximum customers in the morning between 9 am to 12 am, while

    42% get maximum rush in the evening between 6pm to 9pm.Only 1% retailers will get

    maximum recharges during late evening hours between 9pm to 11pm.

    Objective 10: To know which mode of communication is liked by the retailers most

  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Iip

    56/101

  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Iip

    57/101

    I connect Final Report

    49

    20

    26

    14

    51

    98

    Frequency of visits by

    company executives(Rajasthan region)

    Alternate Days

    Fortnight

    Monthly

    Not regular

    Weekly

    Interpretation:

    47% retailers say company executives visit them weekly while 10% retailers are happy with

    the service as company executives visit them every alternate day.

    24% retailers are not happy with the service as the company executives do not visit themregularly hence they lack proper information about the new offers and schemes.

    12% retailers say CE visit them every fortnight while 7% say CE visit them monthly which

    make them unsatisfied with the services.

    Objective 12: To know how is the product awareness among people

    Product awareness

    among people about

    MTS

    Average Excellent Good Poor Grand

    Total

    47 10 149 3 209

  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Iip

    58/101

  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Iip

    59/101

    I connect Final Report

    51

    7

    34

    168

    Company representative's behaviour with retailers

    (Rajasthan region)

    Average

    excellent

    Good

    Interpretation:

    80% retailers say that company representatives behaviour is good, while 3% report it asaverage.

    16% of the retailers perceive the company representatives behaviour to be excellent whentheir frequency of visit was on alternate days.

    Objective 14: To know how is customers satisfaction of after-sales-support service

    How is customer's

    satisfaction of After

    Sales Support

    Average excellent Good Grand Total

    30 15 164 209

    30 15

    164

    Customer satisfaction of after-sales-

    support service of MTS (Rajasthan

    region)

    Average

    excellent

    Good

  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Iip

    60/101

    I connect Final Report

    52

    Interpretation:

    78% retailers perceive the customer satisfaction of after-sales-support service to be good,

    while14% report it to be average.

    7% retailers perceive it to be excellent.This percentage constitutes customers who haveexcellent awareness about the MTS products and services.

    Objective15: To know if the retailers support desk helpful to retailers

    Is retailer support desk

    helpful to the retailers in

    solving their problems

    No Yes Grand Total

    23 186 209

    23

    186

    Is retailer support desk helpful

    (Rajasthan region)

    No

    Yes

    Interpretation:

    89% retailers experience retailer support desk helpful, while 11% do not consider the same.

    SWOT ANALYSIS

  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Iip

    61/101

    I connect Final Report

    53

    7. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS

    The Summer Internship Research project was undertaken in Marketing Department of MTS

    India Rajasthan Circle to study the channel satisfaction of MTS Service In data and

    benchmarking the same with its competitors. Extensive background research was done using

    the secondary data provided by the company and informations available from the internet.

    STRENGTHS

    Execellent Connectivity

    Innovative Schemes

    Good service support

    Reliable and qualityproduct

    WEAKNESSES

    Only CDMA, no GSM

    Lack of propercommunication to theretailers.

    Lacking efficient globaloperations.

    Less brand recall incustomer's mind

    THREATSTuff competition fromother companies.

    Higher margin benefitsto retailers from itscompetitors.

    OPPORTUNIT

    YGrowing immensely indata market.

    Entry into GSMtechnology.

    Increasing usage ofwireless network.

  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Iip

    62/101

    I connect Final Report

    54

    Then the next stage of the research was done using the primary data collections techniques

    like Survey using Questionnaire and Personal Interview with the Retailers across 7 zones of

    Rajasthan. The sample chosen was random to avoid any selection and convinience bias, so

    that we reflect upon the market reality.

    Then careful analysis of data was done to find the following results which can be used

    effectively to increase the market presence of the brand and there by holistically contributing

    to development of the organization.

    It was found that the customers prefer GSM technology over the CDMA network for

    a plethora of reasons and thus communicating the technology per se was found to be

    one of the most important requirement to increase the satisfaction of the customers

    and there by the retailers.

    The profit margin associated with the retailers has enough scope for improvement so

    that they are motivated to increase their sale thereby increasing the overall

    profitability of the retailers.

    It was found that most of the retailers are not satisfied with the untimely and irregular

    visits by the company executives. Thus there is a need for better communication

    between the company executives and the retailers to increase sales and thus prprofit.

    It was found that marketing of MTS products is not as frequent as other competitors .

    Thus there is a scope of improvement in the areas of marketing communication and

    brand positioning since most of the retailers wanted the brand to have a connect with

    India as the other competitors like Reliance and Airtel have been trying to do.

    8. BIBLIOGRAPHY

    Books

    1. Havalder K.K. and Vasant M.C. (2007), Sales and Distribution Management, Tata

    McGraw Hill, New Delhi.2. Philip Kotler and Kevin Lane Keller (12e), Marketing Management, Pearson.

  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Iip

    63/101

    I connect Final Report

    55

    3. Mamoria, C.B and Gankar, S.V (2002) Personnel Management Published byHimalaya Publishing House.

    4. Virmani, B.R. And Seth Premila (1985) Evaluating Management Training andDevelopment Published By Vision Book Pvt Ltd.

    5. Kulkarni M.V, Marketing Research (IV Edition), Everest Publication House, NewDelhi, 2003.

    Websites:

    a. http://www.mtsindia.in/

    b. www.docstoc.com

    c. www.citeman.com

    d. www.wikipedia.org

    e. www.Codeproject.com

    f. www.Projectstoday.com

    g. www.Freelancer.com

    Journals

    1. Forbes

    2. Business Today

    3. Business Week

    APPENDIX 1

    QUESTIONNAIRE FOR CHANNEL SATISFACTION STUDY

    Retailer Name: Mobile Number:

    LAPU Number: Area:

    Region: Date:

    Outlet type: Recharging/Activating/Both

    http://www.mtsindia.in/http://www.mtsindia.in/
  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Iip

    64/101

    I connect Final Report

    56

    1) Which all brands are you associated with?( mark)a) Airtel b) MTS c) Aircel d) Idea

    e) TATA f) Reliance g) Vodafone

    2) Which is the bestselling brand?

    a) Airtel b) MTS c) Aircel d) Idea

    e) TATA f) Reliance g) Vodafone

    3) What is the reason to associate with the brand with maximum sales?

    a) Margin b) Promotional Schemes c) Dealer Relationship

    d) Demand e) Credit Policy f) Connectivity g) Roaming

    4) What is the monthly average recharge amount by the customers for the most selling

    brand and their monthly recharge count?

    a) 10000-20000b) 20000-30000c) 30000-40000 d) 40000-50000

    e) 50000-60000 f) >60000

    Count:a) 20-30 b) 30-40 c) 40-50 d) 50-60 e) 60-70 f) >70

    5) What is the average LAPU balance? (Fig in Rs.)

    a) 500-1000 b) 1000-1500 c) 1500-2000 d) 2000-2500

    e) 2500-3000 f) >3000

    6) What is the reason for LAPU Balance < Rs.500?

    a) Less Demand b) Recharging issues due to Network Congestion

    c) Service issues (sales person not reporting) d) Never Happened

    7) What is the reason for not promoting MTS?

    a) Low Margin b) Less Promotional Schemes c) Unfriendly Dealer

    Relationship

  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Iip

    65/101

    I connect Final Report

    57

    d) Less Demand e) No Credit Policy f) Lack of communication

    g) No Reasons

    8) Which MTS Data Product has maximum potential? (Fig in Rs.)

    a) 198 b) 248 c) 375 d) 490 e) 647

    f) 798 g) 999 h) 1298

    9) What time of the day you get the maximum recharges?

    a) 9-12am b) 12-3pm c) 3-6pm d) 6-9pm e) 9-11pm

    10)How do you like the company to communicate about the new offers to you?

    a) Sales Person b) SMS c) Phone Call d) OBD e) Printing

    Material

    11)How frequently company executives visit and convey schemes?

    a) Daily b)Alternate Days c)Weekly d) Fortnight e)

    Monthly

    f) Not Regular g) Never

    12)How is the product awareness among people about MTS?

    b) Very Poor b) Poor c) Average d) Goode) Excellent

    13) How do you rate the Company Representatives behavior with retailers?b) Very Poor b) Poor c) Average d) Goode) Excellent

    14)How do you rate the Customers satisfaction of After Sales Service Support of MTS?a) Very Poor b) Poor c) Average d) Goode) Excellent

    15)Does the retailer support desk identifies the retailers problems effectivelyand solve them in proper time?

    a) Yes b) No

    16)Suggestions for MTS:

  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Iip

    66/101

    I connect Final Report

    58

    -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Annexure 1

    FORTNIGHTLY PROJECT REPORT

    Name: Anoop Indolia Program: PGDM- Marketing

  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Iip

    67/101

  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Iip

    68/101

    I connect Final Report

    60

    Anoop Indolia

    Signature of Student & Date Signature of Faculty Guide

    5th

    May, 2014

    Annexure 2

    FORTNIGHTLY PROJECT REPORT

    Name: Anoop Indolia Program: PGDM- Marketing

  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Iip

    69/101

    I connect Final Report

    61

    Campus: Kharghar Company: Sistema Shyam Teleservices ltd. (MTS)

    Fortnight Start Date: 06th May 2014 End Date: 19thMay 2014

    Faculty Guide: Prof. Arpita Pandey Company Guide: Mr. Vijesh Bhatnagar

    No. Of leave(s) availed, if any: No

    Fortnightly Report No.: 3

    Target/Task:

    Survey of Retailers covering all the areas of jaipur regarding the sales of laptops/PCs,

    sales of data cards and knowing major issues for drop in sales of data cards.

    Around more than 400 retailers data is given which has to be covered in one month. Knowing retailers point of view on MTS services and what can be done to improve

    the market according to retailers.

    Meeting with Sales head of Rajasthan circle gave broader view of the project to

    increase the sales of data card.

    Strategies:

    By conducting Survey with Retailers regarding the sales of laptop/pc and data cards,

    our market reach will come to know and which area is less covered and reason for

    low sales or decrease in sales of laptop /pc. By taking details of the retailers whether

    they are interested in keeping data cards and what according to them is the reason for

    decrease in sales. Voice of retailers is important as they directly deal with the

    customers. This will help in analyzing the decrease in sales of laptop/pc which

    directly affect the sales of MTS data card.

    Achievement:

    Survey with retailers gave me knowledge of MTS reach in the market.

    Reason for drop in sales and what all improvement is needed is known.

    Communicating with retailers enhanced my market knowledge and communication

    skills.

    Confidence boost

    Meeting with sales head gave clear and broader view of project.

    Learning:

    Better understanding of market.

    Knowing area wise which data card is more preferred gave knowledge of

    competitors.

    Patience

    Faculty Remark (Qualitative):

  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Iip

    70/101

  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Iip

    71/101

    I connect Final Report

    63

    Campus: Kharghar Company: Sistema Shyam Teleservices ltd. (MTS)

    Fortnight Start Date: 20th May 2014 End Date: 02ndJune 2014

    Faculty Guide: Prof. Arpita Pandey Company Guide: Mr. Vijesh Bhatnagar

    No. Of leave(s) availed, if any: No

    Fortnightly Report No.: 4

    Target/Task:

    After covering almost all the areas of Jaipur, two major Areas Raiser Plaza and

    Jayanti Bazar were left to be covered regarding the sales of data cards and number of

    activations.

    Knowing whether sales have fallen or risen. And finding out the reasons for the same.

    Main task is to know the market demand and increase the sales and activations of data

    cards.

    Around 150 retailers are needed to be approached and information regarding thesales and demands of data cards are gathered.

    Knowing retailers point of view on MTS services and what can be done to improve

    the market according to retailers.

    Strategies:

    Raiser Plaza and Jayanti Bazar are the two major areas of jaipur. Most of the

    electronics shops are there and major retailers of data cards.

    By conducting survey in raiser plaza and jayanti bazar regarding the number of

    connections sold and number of data card sold will give correct idea of main reasons

    for sales and retailers voice.

    To know the real market competition.

    Achievement:

    Survey with retailers enhanced market knowledge.

    Reason for increase in sales and what all improvement is needed is known.

    Communicating with retailers enhanced my market knowledge and communication

    skills.

    Confidence boost

    Few retailers who are interested in doing business with MTS were found.

    Learning:

    Better understanding of market.

    Recognization of major competitors in market.

    Knowing area wise which data card is more preferred gave better product knowledge. Patience in dealing with Retailers.

  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Iip

    72/101

    I connect Final Report

    64

    Faculty Remark (Qualitative):

    Anoop Indolia

    Signature of Student & Date Signature of Faculty Guide

    2nd

    June, 2014

    Annexure 4

    FORTNIGHTLY PROJECT REPORT

    Name: Anoop Indolia Program: PGDM- Marketing

    Campus: Kharghar Company: Sistema Shyam Teleservices ltd. (MTS)

  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Iip

    73/101

  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Iip

    74/101

    I connect Final Report

    66

    Anoop Indolia

    Signature of Student & Date Signature of Faculty Guide

    17th

    June, 2014

    Annexure 5

    FORTNIGHTLY PROJECT REPORT

    Name: Anoop Indolia Program: PGDM- Marketing

    Campus: Kharghar Company: Sistema Shyam Teleservices ltd. (MTS)

  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Iip

    75/101

    I connect Final Report

    67

    Fortnight Start Date: 18thJune 2014 End Date: 02ndJuly 2014

    Faculty Guide: Prof. Arpita Pandey Company Guide: Mr. Vijesh Bhatnagar

    No. Of leave(s) availed, if any: No

    Fortnightly Report No.: 6

    Target/Task:

    After the survey about MTS services and Competitors, area wise analysis is done and

    discussed with the company guide.

    Those retailers who are not in business with MTS and willing to connect with MTS

    are approached.

    By conducting surveys, it is find out that there are various ways by which MTS sales

    can be improved. Meeting with distributors and knowing there demand for MTS Data cards and

    knowing whether company person from MTS approaches to the distributors and

    retailers on time or any improvement is required.

    Study of various tariffs of Data card.

    Strategies:

    To know the real market competition.

    To know MTS market reach.

    To know whether proper information is being communicated to retailers and

    customers

    To understand MTS data card tariff and usage

    To increase the retailer base of MTS.

    Achievement:

    Survey with retailers enhanced market knowledge.

    Understanding of competition in market place.

    Communicating with retailers enhanced my market knowledge and communication

    skills.

    Retailers who were found interested in doing business with MTS are approached.

    Confidence boost

    Learning:

    Better understanding of market.

    Recognization of major competitors in market.

    Knowing area wise which data card is more preferred gave better product knowledge.

  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Iip

    76/101

    I connect Final Report

    68

    Patience in dealing with Retailers.

    Faculty Remark (Qualitative):

    Anoop Indolia

    Signature of Student & Date Signature of Faculty Guide

    02nd

    July , 2014

    Annexure 6

    FORTNIGHTLY PROJECT REPORT

    Name: Anoop Indolia Program: PGDM- Marketing

    Campus: Kharghar Company: Sistema Shyam Teleservices ltd. (MTS)

  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Iip

    77/101

    I connect Final Report

    69

    Fortnight Start Date: 3rdJuly 2014 End Date: 17ndJuly 2014

    Faculty Guide: Prof. Arpita Pandey Company Guide: Mr. Vijesh Bhatnagar

    No. Of leave(s) availed, if any: No

    Fortnightly Report No.: 7

    Target/Task:

    Study of various tariffs of Data card.

    After the detail study, market analysis is done through various surveys.

    A new Scheme for best offer in data is to be launched.

    Analysis of base and best offer for data customers.

    Upload of base and scheme

    Work on proper communication of scheme to the retailers and customers. Competition plans are studied and analyzed.

    Finding out problems which occur related to data card services and dongles.

    Finding out resolution for problems.

    Checking posters to be printed in for data services.

    Strategies:

    To know the real market competition.

    To know whether proper information is being communicated to retailers and

    customers

    To understand MTS data card tariff and usage

    To increase the usage of existing customers

    Achievement:

    Launch of new offer and uploading a base.

    Proper communication of scheme.

    Understanding of competition plan.

    Understanding of planning of retention of customers.

    Problem identification regarding Data cards.

    Learning:

    Better understanding of market.

    Recognization of major competitors plan. Learned new scheme planning according to base usage to increase revenue.

  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Iip

    78/101

    I connect Final Report

    70

    Faculty Remark (Qualitative):

    Anoop Indolia

    Signature of Student & Date Signature of Faculty Guide

    17th

    July , 2014

    Annexure 7

    FORTNIGHTLY PROJECT REPORT

    Name: Anoop Indolia Program: PGDM- Marketing

    Campus: Kharghar Company: Sistema Shyam Teleservices ltd. (MTS)

  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Iip

    79/101

  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Iip

    80/101

    I connect Final Report

    72

    Learned to prepare report for the new scheme launched.

    Learned how to solve problem of customers at service desk.

    How to increase usage and retain customers.

    Faculty Remark (Qualitative):

    Anoop Indolia

    Signature of Student & Date Signature of Faculty Guide

    01stAug , 2014

    Annexure 8

    FORTNIGHTLY PROJECT REPORT

    Name: Anoop Indolia Program: PGDM- Marketing

    Campus: Kharghar Company: Sistema Shyam Teleservices ltd. (MTS)

  • 8/10/2019 Final Report Iip

    81/101

    I connect Final Report

    73

    Fortnight Start Date: 02ndAug 2014 End Date: 16thAug 2014

    Faculty Guide: Prof. Arpita Pandey Company Guide: Mr. Vijesh Bhatnagar

    No. Of leave(s) availed, if any: No

    Fortnightly Report No.: 9

    Target/Task:

    Daily Report preparation for new scheme launched.

    Keep track of retailer payout.

    Study of usage pattern of data card users.

    Survey of customers for customer satisfaction level with MTS services.

    Communication with the call center for customer complaints.

    Market Visit with Sales team.

    Strategies:

    To increase the average revenue.

    To retain the customers and increase the usage.

    Customer voice is essential to improve the services.

    To know the various problem faced by customer and their solution.

    Market visit to understand the market situation.

    Achievement:

    Successfully studied the usage pattern of data card customers.

    Interaction with customers about various schemes launched by MTS.

    First time ever visit to market as an company analyst and taking feedback from

    retailers.

    Learning:

    Understanding of customers need and complaints.

    Learned to prepare report for the new scheme launched.

    Learned how to solve problem of customers at service desk.

    How to increase usage and retain customers.

    Faculty Remark (Qualitative):

  • 8/10/201