Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 000, 000–000 (0000) Printed 23 July 2018 (MN LATEX style file v2.2)

Filamentary Star Formation in NGC 1275

R.E.A. Canning,1,2? J.E. Ryon,3 J.S. Gallagher III,3 R. Kotulla,4 R.W.O’Connell,5 A.C. Fabian,6, R.M. Johnstone,6 C.J. Conselice,7 A. Hicks,8

D. Rosario,9 and R.F.G. Wyse101Kavli Institute for Particle Astrophysics and Cosmology (KIPAC), Stanford University, 452 Lomita Mall, Stanford, CA 94305-4085, USA2Department of Physics, Stanford University, 452 Lomita Mall, Stanford, CA 94305-4085, USA3Department of Astronomy, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 475 N. Charter St., Madison, WI, 537064Department of Physics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, 1900 E. Kenwood Blvd., Milwaukee, WI, 532115Department of Astronomy, University of Virginia, P.O. Box 400235, Charlottesville, VI, 229046Institute of Astronomy, University of Cambridge, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 0HA7School of Physics & Astronomy, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham NG7 2RD8Department of Physics & Astronomy, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824-2320, USA9Max Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial Physics, Postfach 1312, 85741 Garching, Germany10Physics and Astronomy Department, Johns Hopkins University, 3400 North Charles Street, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA

23 July 2018

ABSTRACTWe examine the star formation in the outer halo of NGC 1275, the central galaxy in thePerseus cluster (Abell 426), using far ultraviolet and optical images obtained with the HubbleSpace Telescope. We have identified a population of very young, compact star clusters withtypical ages of a few Myr. The star clusters are organized on multiple-kiloparsec scales. Manyof these star clusters are associated with “streaks” of young stars, the combination of whichhas a cometary appearance. We perform photometry on the star clusters and diffuse stellarstreaks, and fit their spectral energy distributions to obtain ages and masses. These youngstellar populations appear to be normal in terms of their masses, luminosities and clusterformation efficiency; <10% of the young stellar mass is located in star clusters. Our datasuggest star formation is associated with the evolution of some of the giant gas filaments inNGC 1275 that become gravitationally unstable on reaching and possibly stalling in the outergalaxy. The stellar streaks then could represent stars moving on ballistic orbits in the potentialwell of the galaxy cluster. We propose a model where star-forming filaments, switched on∼50 Myr ago and are currently feeding the growth of the NGC 1275 stellar halo at a rateof ≈2-3 M yr−1. This type of process may also build stellar halos and form isolated starclusters in the outskirts of youthful galaxies.

Key words: galaxies: clusters: individual: Perseus galaxies: individual: NGC 1275 starclusters.

1 INTRODUCTION

Most star formation in the local universe occurs in galaxy disks.Dynamical instabilities in disks aid in the formation of star-forminggas clouds (e.g., Toomre 1977; Kennicutt 1998; Leroy et al. 2008).Low level star formation is also observed in more diffuse gas struc-tures, including extraplanar colliding gas shells (Tullmann et al.2003), tidal debris (de Mello et al. 2008; Werk et al. 2008), and ingas on the boundaries of radio jets and lobes (e.g., Graham 1998;Mould et al. 2000; O’Dea et al. 2004). The most spectacular ex-amples of star formation outside of galactic disks, however, oc-

? E-mail: rcanning@stanford.edu

cur in the vicinities of some brightest cluster galaxies (BCGs) inrich X-ray ‘cool core’ galaxy clusters (e.g. Allen 1995; McNamaraet al. 2006; Rafferty, McNamara & Nulsen 2008; O’Dea et al. 2008;Quillen et al. 2008; O’Dea et al. 2010; Hicks, Mushotzky & Don-ahue 2010; McDonald et al. 2011; Oonk et al. 2011; Tremblay et al.2012; McDonald et al. 2012). These objects can support galactic-scale star formation in extended gas structures which are productsof interactions between the BCG and its surroundings.

In this paper, we present an ultraviolet imaging studyof the spectacular outer star-forming filaments associated withNGC 1275, the BCG in the Perseus galaxy cluster, based on dataobtained with the Hubble Space Telescope (HST). Despite beinginitially classified as an early-type galaxy (Hubble & Humason

c© 0000 RAS

arX

iv:1

406.

4800

v1 [

astr

o-ph

.GA

] 1

8 Ju

n 20

14

2

1931), several structural oddities of NGC 1275 were soon discov-ered. One mysterious feature is an extensive “web” of gaseous,emission line filaments, strongly emitting in Hα (Minkowski 1955;Lynds 1970). Observations of H2 and CO have shown a substan-tial mass of molecular gas exists in the core of NGC 1275 (Bridges& Irwin 1998; Donahue et al. 2000; Edge et al. 2002) and is alsoentrained in the filaments (Hatch et al. 2005; Salome et al. 2006;Johnstone et al. 2007; Salome et al. 2011; Lim et al. 2012), andrecent far infrared (FIR) observations with the Herschel space tele-scope are allowing us to probe the nature of this cold gas reservoir(Mittal et al. 2012). The most promising mechanism for heatingthese multiphase filaments is supra-thermal particle heating fromthe surrounding hot X-ray ICM (Ferland et al. 2009).

Perhaps the most peculiar feature of NGC 1275 is evidencefor recent massive star formation in and around the galaxy’s mainbody. The presence of this star formation has been known for sometime (see e.g. Sandage 1971; van den Bergh 1977, and referencestherein). Adams (1977) noted ultraviolet (UV) emission beyond thegalaxy’s main body to the northwest and southeast. He suggested itcould be due to the presence of hot stars, a point also discussed bySmith et al. (1992) on the basis of far ultraviolet (FUV) imaging.Based on stellar population synthesis modeling and the detectionof strong Balmer emission in an integrated spectrum of the central25′′ of NGC 1275, Wirth, Kenyon & Hunter (1983) concluded thata large population of B stars must be present. A localized popu-lation of young stars was directly detected spectroscopically ∼19′′

from the galaxy’s center by Shields, Filippenko & Basri (1990), andsince then, multiple young clusters have been found in the galaxy’soutskirts (e.g., Shields, Filippenko & Basri 1990; Holtzman et al.1992). McNamara, O’Connell & Sarazin (1996) conducted a mul-tiwavelength study of the structure of NGC 1275, and suggestedthe presence of young stars in the outskirts, which were later foundby Conselice, Gallagher & Wyse (2001) to have very blue colors,consistent with young stellar populations.

Canning et al. (2010) (hereafter Paper I) used optical HSTimaging to demonstrate that the outer UV-bright structures containstar clusters with ages<100 Myr, in contrast to the high-luminosityclusters in the galaxy’s central regions with ages >100 Myr. Theauthors infer, from the optical colors, a SFR of ∼20 M yr−1inthese outer regions and conclude that the outer stellar features musthave a different origin to the blue cluster population studied byCarlson et al. (1998) in the central regions of NGC 1275. How-ever, without higher resolution UV imaging, more accurate ages ofthese star clusters could not determined. Paper I also discusses thepresence of clumpy stellar “streaks”, cometary features with a starcluster at the “head,” followed by a “tail” of more diffuse stellarlight, within the larger UV-bright structures of Adams (1977) (seesection 5). These streaks may be due to the dissolution of the starclusters as they are released from their natal gas and fall toward thecenter of NGC 1275. More accurate ages of the star clusters andstellar streaks are needed to understand their origin.

Our investigation utilizes results of our FUV and optical HSTACS observations of the outer UV-bright filaments of young starsin NGC 1275. We combine Solar Blind Channel (SBC) FUV datawith Wide Field Camera (WFC) optical data to obtain accurate agesand masses of the young star cluster candidates and associated dif-fuse light. Section 2 describes our HST observations, data reduc-tion, source selection, and photometry. In Section 3, we describethe method for fitting the SEDs of our sources. Section 4 addressesthe colors, masses, and ages of the compact star clusters. In Sec-tion 5, we discuss the properties of the stellar streaks. Section 6addresses how the star formation studied here fits in the context

of the large-scale emission-line filaments. Section 7 contains ourconclusions.

Throughout this paper we assume the standard ΛCDM cos-mology where H0 = 71 km s−1, Ωm = 0.3 and Ωλ = 0.7. Forthis cosmology and at the redshift of NGC 1275 (z = 0.0176), anangular size of 10′′ corresponds to a distance of 3.5 kpc.

2 OBSERVATIONS & DATA REDUCTION

Optical observations of NGC 1275 were obtained with the HSTACS/WFC on 2006 August 5 in the F435W, F550M, and F625Wfilters (first published in Fabian et al. 2008), The ACS/WFC fieldof view is 202”×202” with pixel scale 0.05”/pixel. 2 F435W point-ings and 3 F550M and F6255W pointings were required, taken in amosaic across NGC 1275, and FUV observations were obtainedwith the ACS/SBC on 2008 March 16 to 21 in the F140LP fil-ter. Table 1 summarizes these observations. The field of view ofACS/SBC (FoV: 34.6”×30.8”, pixel scale: 0.034”×0.030”/pixel)is smaller than the ACS/WFC and multiple pointings with the SBCwere required to image the sites of outer star formation. Figure 1shows these SBC pointing locations overlaid on the WFC F435Woptical image. Note that the SBC pointings have been labeled 01,02, 06, 07, and 08. Pointings 03 and 04 suffer from confusion withthe HVS and so we choose not to analyse these images here. 01 and02 cover the Northwest Region, 06 covers the Southern Filament,and 07 and 08 cover the Blue Loop.

NGC 1275 consists of two distinct velocity components, thehigh velocity system (HVS) at v = 8200 km s−1 and the lowvelocity system (LVS) at v = 5200 km s−1 (Minkowski 1955).The HVS is associated with a dusty foreground object, possibly alate-type galaxy falling in to the cluster, while the early-type galaxyand emission-line filaments constitute the LVS (Rubin et al. 1977;Conselice, Gallagher & Wyse 2001). X-ray absorption by the HVSrequires that the distance between the HVS and LVS is greater than100 kpc (Sanders & Fabian 2007). The star formation in the North-west Region (pointings 01 and 02) could be associated with theHVS, but we view this as unlikely due to the morphological simi-larity of the stellar streaks with the emission-line filaments. In addi-tion, spectroscopic studies have confirmed that a complex of brightstar clusters to the south of the Northwest Region, nicknamed the‘Snake’ (see Figure 1), lies at the redshift of the LVS (Hatch et al.2006). For the remainder of this paper we shall make the assump-tion that the star formation identified in the regions specified aboveare associated with the LVS.

The WFC F625W filter includes Hα, [N II] and [S II] emissionfrom both the HVS and LVS and the WFC F435W filter includes[O II] emission from both the HVS and LVS. The SBC F140LPfilter transmits both the two photon continuum, which is expectedto be associated with the Hα filaments (Johnstone et al. 2012), andC IV 1549 A line emission, a strong cooling line diagnostic of 105

K gas which has been seen in a similar filamentary system sur-rounding M87 in the Virgo cluster (Sparks et al. 2009, 2012). Asnoted in Paper I, the young star clusters are typically offset fromthe brightest filamentary emission (typical offsets are ∼ a few arc-sec so 0.6-1 kpc; see Figure 2); the distribution of the UV emissionfollows that of the broad band optical filters not the narrow-bandHα imaging. Using WIYN narrow-band Hα imaging and scalingfrom the ratios of CIV, HeII (Sparks et al. 2009, 2012) and F

1500A(Johnstone et al. 2012) to Hα on the tails of the streaks we esti-mate emission line contamination in the F140LP filter to be at most2 thousandths of the total flux. However, in order to minimise the

c© 0000 RAS, MNRAS 000, 000–000

Filamentary Star Formation in NGC 1275 3

contamination by emission lines, not associated with the clusters,we take background regions local to the sources for our photom-etry. Our approach therefore assumes that any background due toionized gas and stars is uniform over small regions of the outergalaxy.

The standard procedure was used to bias-subtract and flat-fieldthe data frames. These were then drizzled together as described inthe HST ACS data handbook1. The SBC suffers from a red leak.Accurate removal of the contaminating light from our data requiresadditional exposures of NGC 1275 using a redder SBC filter. How-ever, these data currently do not exist. Fortunately, A-type stars andearlier have very minimal contamination at these wavelengths (seeHST/ACS Data Handbook1). Additionally, our analysis focuses onthe outer regions (∼20 kpc from the nucleus) of NGC 1275 wherethe underlying red galaxy is not very luminous. We therefore con-clude that the red leak contribution to the emission measured in thevicinity of the UV-bright sources in these regions is negligible.

Both very diffuse and compact FUV emission is observed inthese three regions. In this paper we ignore the most diffuse com-ponent of the UV emission and concentrate on the properties of thecometary stellar “streaks”. In doing so we are measuring a lowerlimit for the mass of young stars in these regions. The insert inFigure 1 illustrates the morphology of a stellar “streak”. The UVemission has a cometary appearance, with a compact star clusterat the “head” and more diffuse emission following in a “tail”. Inall regions the “heads” are orientated away from the central galaxy.We used different techniques to perform photometry on these com-ponents. Some of the streaks are not obviously associated with astar cluster, but we included them in this analysis nevertheless.

We used IRAF2 DAOFIND to perform source selection on thecompact sources in the SBC images. We used a threshold of 13times the standard deviation of the background, as determined inregions of each image without bright sources. We constrained theFWHM to 6 pixels, and the sharpness and roundness parameters to0.2 to 0.8 and -1 to 1, respectively. A few obvious sources missedby DAOFIND were added in by hand through visual inspection ofthe images. Spurious sources, including chip edge effects, and realsources detected in overlapping regions of the SBC pointings wereremoved from the catalogue. The catalogue was then matched tocorresponding sources in the optical; no source selection was per-formed on the WFC images. The above procedure strongly biasesus towards selecting very young star clusters, since young, massivestars are the main stellar source of FUV flux. We justify this bynoting that we are primarily interested in sites of recent or ongoingstar formation. We will call these compact sources star clusters forthe rest of this paper, although we could not determine if they arebound or unbound.

We performed aperture photometry on our catalogue withDAOPHOT. The STMAG zeropoints were determined by the pro-cedure given in the HST ACS Data Handbook. We chose photomet-ric apertures of radius 0.1”, which corresponds to a physical radiusof ∼35 pc at the distance of NGC 1275. The small apertures avoidoverlap of sources in crowded regions. Growth curves of bright,isolated sources were constructed to find optimal sky annuli. Av-erage aperture corrections for the WFC data were determined in

1 http://www.stsci.edu/hst/acs/documents/handbooks/currentDHB2 IRAF is distributed by the National Optical Astronomy Observatories,which are operated by the Association of Universities for Research inAstronomy, Inc., under cooperative agreement with the National ScienceFoundation.

Table 1. Summary of HST Observations

Camera Filter Date Program Exp. TimeID (s)

ACS/SBC F140LP 16-21 March 2008 GO 11207 2552ACS/WFC F435W 05 August 2006 GO 10546 9834ACS/WFC F550M 05 August 2006 GO 10546 12,132ACS/WFC F625W 05 August 2006 GO 10546 12,405

each region from isolated clusters with smooth growth curves. Forthe SBC data, empirical aperture corrections were deemed unreli-able due to strongly varying growth curves. We therefore derivedaperture corrections from the encircled energy fractions of Dieballet al. (2007). Table 2 contains our photometry parameters and aper-ture corrections. The magnitudes and magnitude errors, with aper-ture corrections applied, of the star clusters in our catalog are listedin Table 3. The aperture corrections dominate the magnitude un-certainties. Note that these magnitudes have been corrected for theforeground extinction listed in Table 2 using the reddening law ofCardelli, Clayton & Mathis (1989).

To estimate the contribution of the “tails” to the total FUVstreak emission, we used SExtractor3 (Bertin & Arnouts 1996) toidentify stellar streaks 5 sigma above the background in the SBCimages. We determined the background by creating histograms ofthe pixel values in neighboring areas of the image, offset in an-gle, but at the same galactocentric radius as the streak under study.We tested the background on a per pixel basis and also over con-tiguous regions of the same size as each of our detected ellipses.We were careful to avoid areas that obviously contained star clus-ters but we did not excise regions where there is no star forma-tion but which include emission-line filaments. The filaments arethin thread-like structures which add negligibly to the background.Most star formation is offset from the emission-line filaments andlocal backgrounds are taken for the photometry. The variance inthe background was determined from the one sigma deviation ofthe background distribution. We then performed photometry usingthe apertures identified by SExtractor.

We also removed the aperture-corrected flux of the compactstar cluster associated with each streak, if one was present. Theapertures were sufficiently large such that the emission from eachstreak was encapsulated within the aperture, so we did not ap-ply aperture corrections. Using circular apertures of radius 0.15”placed by eye along the streaks, we also investigate the possibil-ity of an age gradient. This is discussed further in Section 5. Thebackground was determined in the same fashion as for the ellipticalapertures encompassing the diffuse stellar streaks.

3 GALEV MODELING

To model the stellar populations in the observed star clusters andstellar streaks, we used the GALEV models of Kotulla et al. (2009),and a Salpeter (1955) IMF with stellar masses ranging from 0.1to 100 M. Recent work has suggested that the IMF in massiveelliptical galaxies is ‘heavy’ compared with less massive systems(van Dokkum et al. 2010; Cappellari et al. 2012), however, the formof the IMF in these regions under study is not known. Using instead

3 http://www.astromatic.net/software/sextractor

c© 0000 RAS, MNRAS 000, 000–000

4

Figure 1. F435W optical image overlaid with the five SBC pointings analysed in this paper. 01 and 02 cover the Northwest Region, 06 covers the SouthernFilament, and 07 and 08 cover the Blue Loop. The inset shows a close up of the eastern arm of the Blue Loop (see pointing 08) illustrating the presenceof diffuse stellar “streaks” and compact UV sources; one such streak is labeled. The SBC field-of-view covers 34.6”×30.8” while the larger ACS WFCfield-of-view is 202”×202”. The center of NGC 1275 is at coordinates 49.9507, 41.5118.

Figure 2. Three color Hα, F435W and F140LP images of the three star forming regions in the outskirts of the NGC 1275 low-velocity system; (left) Blue Loop(49.9671, 41.5040), (middle) Northwest Region (49.9458,41.5295), and (right) Southern Filament (49.4937, 41.5019). The Hα is from narrow-bandimaging using the WIYN telescope, The bright galaxy in the Northern Region is a cluster member 2MASXi J0319467+413145.

a Kroupa IMF would decrease our mass estimates by a factor of∼1.4.

To obtain a sufficiently high age resolution for the expectedyoung ages, we used the stellar evolution data presented in Meynetet al. (1994), and chose a time resolution of 105 years. Our modelcovers the metallicity range from 1/50 solar to twice the solar valuein 5 bins, though it should be noted that our age and mass estimatesare not very sensitive to the metallicity, and all models contain both

gaseous and line emission. We include on some figures the modelswithout gaseous and line emission, however, models without lineemission are a poor fit to the cluster UV- or optical-F625W colorswithout appealing to un-physically large extinctions (see Figures 3and 4). Additionally, whilst most stellar streaks are offset from theHα filaments the UV bright ‘heads’ often coincide in projectionwith the Hα emission in the narrow-band images. These spectrafor each timestep were then redshifted to z = 0.0176 (the redshift

c© 0000 RAS, MNRAS 000, 000–000

Filamentary Star Formation in NGC 1275 5

Table 2. Aperture Photometry Parameters and Aperture Corrections.

Camera & Zeropoint Aperture Annular Annular Foreground ApertureFilter (STMAG) (pix) Radius Width Extinction Correctiona (mag)

(pix) (pix) (mag) A B C

SBC F140LP 20.3164 4 7 5 1.35 0.67 0.67 0.67WFC F435W 25.1572 2 15 10 0.67 0.51± 0.05 0.54± 0.07 0.6± 0.1

WFC F550M 24.9335 2 15 10 0.50 0.54± 0.04 0.5± 0.1 0.57± 0.05WFC F625W 26.2062 2 15 10 0.43 0.68± 0.07 0.71± 0.07 0.58± 0.07

Note: A, B, and C refer to the Northwest Region, Southern Filament, and Blue Loop, respectively.a Aperture corrections calculated from the average difference in flux between apertures of 0.1′′ radius and 0.6′′ radius.

−4.5 −4.0 −3.5 −3.0 −2.5 −2.0 −1.5(F140LP - F550M)0 (mag)

23.0

23.5

24.0

24.5

25.0

25.5

26.0

F55

0M0

(mag

)

AV = 0.5

1

3 5

7

10

20

35

7

10

20

−2.0 −1.5 −1.0 −0.5 0.0(F435W - F625W)0 (mag)

22.5

23.0

23.5

24.0

24.5

25.0

F43

5W0

(mag

)

AV = 0.5

1

3

5

7

10

20

1

3

5

7

10

20

2x104 M, Z

2x104 M, 0.5 Z

2x104 M, Z, no gas

Northwest Region

Southern Filament

Blue Loop

Figure 3. (Left) FUV-optical and (right) optical-only cluster CMDs with foreground reddening corrections applied to the measured magnitudes. The NorthwestRegion, Southern Filament, and Blue Loop sources are denoted with orange diamonds, green triangles, and blue squares, respectively. Blue dashed and dottedlines are evolutionary tracks corresponding to solar and half solar metallicity SEDs respectively, with mass 2 × 104 M (lowering the mass of the clusterresults in the vertical movement of the tracks to dimmer magnitudes) and the orange solid line indicates the tracks for a solar metallicity model without lineemission. The numbered points on each track represent the location of an SSP of age 1, 3, 5, 7, 10, and 20 Myr. When emission lines are included initiallythe light is dominated by nebular continuum and Hα emission making the F435W-F625W color redder. The turn over at 7 Myr is due to the appearance ofsuper-giant stars, in this case the blue super-giants dominate over the red super-giant stars.

of NGC 1275) and convolved with the filter functions for our filters,F140LP, F435W, F550M, and F625W, including the filter transmis-sions and detector efficiencies, to avoid uncertainties introduced byfilter transformations.

To obtain ages, metallicities, and stellar masses for each clus-ter, we corrected the observed multi-wavelength photometry forgalactic foreground emission (E(B−V ) = 0.1627±0.0014 in thedirection of NGC 1275, determined using the reddening maps ofSchlegel, Finkbeiner & Davis 1998; corresponds to reddening val-ues in Table 2) and compared it to the above model grid using theSED fitting code GAZELLE (Kotulla, in prep). GAZELLE is basedon a χ2 algorithm and determines both the best-fit values and theirrespective 1σ uncertainties, allowing the stellar mass and intrinsicdust extinction as free parameters. The young compact clusters arebest fit with low extinctions with E(B− V ) ∼0.04 and ranging be-tween 0.0 and 0.1. Dust has never been directly detected in the outerfilaments of NGC 1275. Case B line ratios indicate a relatively highHα/Hβ line ratio ∼3-5 (Hatch et al. 2005), however, the ionization

mechanism is uncertain and probably has a significant contribu-tion from collisional excitation. When fitting the stellar streaks wemake the assumption that the extinction will be similar or less thanthe UV bright regions and limit the extinction to be E(B−V )<0.1.

4 PROPERTIES OF THE YOUNG STAR CLUSTERS

Paper I found a bimodal distribution of clusters in the outer en-velope of NGC 1275. The bluer clusters were distributed an-isotropically, similar to, but typically offset by 0.6-1 kpc, from theHα filaments. In contrast the redder cluster population were dis-tributed isotropically across the fields studied and had no morpho-logical connection with the emission line filaments. Paper I con-cludes the blue population must have a different formation mech-anism to the red population and the blue and red stars cannot bedescribed as continuous star formation from a single event, the up-per limits on the ages of the blue population from SSP models of

c© 0000 RAS, MNRAS 000, 000–000

6

Table 3. Star Cluster Photometry and Derived Properties

RA Dec F140LP0 F435W0 F550M0 F625W0 Age 1 σ range Mass 1σ rangeJ2000 J2000 (mag) (mag) (mag) (mag) (Myr) (Myr) (103 M) (103 M)

Northwest Region

3:19:49.1 +41:31:32 20.99± 0.07 24.17± 0.05 24.85± 0.05 24.89± 0.07 4.0 [2.3, 4.1] 12.1 [7.25, 12.4]3:19:48.4 +41:31:37 20.50± 0.06 23.60± 0.05 24.47± 0.04 24.01± 0.07 3.9 [1.9, 4.1] 16.4 [10.8, 17.5]3:19:47.9 +41:31:41 21.78± 0.11 24.43± 0.05 25.09± 0.05 25.19± 0.07 11.2 [2.7, 12.6] 29.4 [5.71, 33.7]3:19:46.8 +41:31:51 21.40± 0.09 24.48± 0.05 25.33± 0.05 25.31± 0.07 4.0 [2.2, 4.0] 8.33 [4.79, 8.33]3:19:46.2 +41:32:01 21.37± 0.09 24.47± 0.05 25.43± 0.05 25.58± 0.07 4.0 [2.1, 4.0] 8.46 [4.79, 8.46]3:19:46.5 +41:31:56 21.02± 0.08 24.05± 0.05 25.00± 0.05 25.25± 0.07 4.0 [2.2, 4.0] 11.8 [6.84, 11.8]3:19:46.2 +41:31:58 21.15± 0.08 24.11± 0.05 25.12± 0.05 24.96± 0.07 2.4 [2.2, 4.0] 6.52 [5.97, 10.6]3:19:46.3 +41:31:54 20.58± 0.06 22.92± 0.05 23.62± 0.04 23.66± 0.07 4.2 [2.5, 17.6] 38.5 [24.4, 193.0]3:19:46.0 +41:31:48 20.26± 0.05 22.98± 0.05 23.79± 0.04 24.01± 0.07 4.1 [2.5, 8.9] 28.3 [16.3, 97.5]3:19:46.1 +41:31:48 21.32± 0.09 24.26± 0.06 25.12± 0.05 25.34± 0.07 4.0 [2.3, 4.1] 9.07 [5.58, 9.27]3:19:46.4 +41:31:55 21.10± 0.08 23.68± 0.05 24.37± 0.04 24.58± 0.07 4.3 [3.1, 12.0] 15.5 [10.6, 60.0]3:19:46.2 +41:31:52 21.32± 0.09 24.32± 0.05 25.17± 0.05 25.48± 0.07 4.0 [2.4, 4.1] 8.99 [5.53, 9.17]3:19:46.4 +41:31:56 21.29± 0.09 24.14± 0.05 25.02± 0.05 25.23± 0.07 4.0 [2.2, 8.0] 10.3 [6.05, 31.8]3:19:46.7 +41:31:53 21.26± 0.09 23.86± 0.05 24.74± 0.05 24.16± 0.07 3.6 [0.2, 8.1] 15.7 [9.31, 29.4]

Southern Filament

3:19:46.2 +41:29:57 20.90±0.07 23.40±0.07 24.27±0.10 24.20±0.07 4.7 [2.3, 12.6] 17.7 [12.5, 77.8]

Blue Loop

3:19:51.0 +41:30:19 21.29± 0.09 24.01± 0.10 25.09± 0.07 25.31± 0.08 4.0 [2.3, 4.2] 9.73 [5.71, 9.73]3:19:51.1 +41:30:12 20.50± 0.06 23.33± 0.10 24.35± 0.05 23.70± 0.07 2.0 [1.4, 4.1] 16.2 [12.8, 22.4]3:19:50.7 +41:30:19 21.48± 0.10 23.66± 0.10 24.45± 0.06 24.77± 0.08 19.9 [3.0, 21.5] 64.4 [11.0, 76.7]3:19:51.4 +41:30:09 21.89± 0.12 24.59± 0.10 25.44± 0.08 25.84± 0.09 4.1 [2.5, 8.8] 5.64 [3.59, 21.1]3:19:53.9 +41:30:03 21.11± 0.08 23.77± 0.10 24.71± 0.05 24.32± 0.07 4.0 [1.6, 11.6] 16.8 [9.07, 56.5]3:19:54.0 +41:30:00 21.72± 0.11 24.49± 0.10 25.53± 0.07 24.99± 0.07 3.6 [1.1, 4.4] 6.46 [4.03, 7.87]3:19:53.0 +41:30:18 20.41± 0.06 22.95± 0.10 23.90± 0.05 24.13± 0.07 3.2 [2.5, 8.9] 17.2 [14.6, 86.0]3:19:53.2 +41:30:12 20.25± 0.05 22.84± 0.10 23.78± 0.05 24.05± 0.07 3.2 [2.5, 8.6] 19.8 [16.7, 94.5]3:19:53.2 +41:30:07 20.84± 0.07 23.60± 0.10 24.57± 0.06 24.58± 0.07 4.0 [2.1, 8.1] 17.8 [9.34, 49.9]3:19:53.0 +41:30:06 20.53± 0.06 23.33± 0.10 24.32± 0.05 24.32± 0.07 4.0 [2.2, 4.3] 21.9 [12.3, 21.9]3:19:53.0 +41:30:05 20.72± 0.07 23.52± 0.10 24.54± 0.06 24.10± 0.07 3.9 [1.6, 4.6] 17.6 [9.74, 18.1]3:19:52.9 +41:30:07 21.19± 0.09 23.90± 0.10 24.87± 0.06 24.50± 0.07 4.0 [1.6, 11.4] 13.7 [7.40, 50.9]3:19:53.1 +41:30:01 20.76± 0.07 22.65± 0.10 23.33± 0.05 23.52± 0.07 6.7 [3.1, 34.8] 56.9 [23.0, 293.0]3:19:53.0 +41:30:04 20.67± 0.07 23.31± 0.10 24.37± 0.05 23.78± 0.07 2.1 [1.0, 4.3] 18.1 [13.3, 23.3]3:19:53.0 +41:30:04 21.20± 0.09 23.86± 0.10 24.94± 0.06 24.10± 0.07 2.8 [0.7, 3.9] 9.94 [5.67, 11.5]3:19:52.9 +41:30:03 20.34± 0.06 23.08± 0.10 24.13± 0.05 23.65± 0.07 3.8 [1.5, 4.7] 25.6 [14.7, 27.8]3:19:52.7 +41:30:00 20.07± 0.05 22.91± 0.10 23.87± 0.05 24.02± 0.07 4.0 [2.3, 4.1] 30.1 [18.1, 30.1]3:19:53.9 +41:30:04 21.36± 0.09 23.32± 0.10 23.85± 0.05 24.08± 0.07 10.8 [3.4, 38.6] 54.4 [18.5, 171.0]3:19:52.9 +41:30:04 20.49± 0.06 23.20± 0.10 24.17± 0.05 24.03± 0.07 3.4 [2.0, 8.5] 17.7 [13.4, 74.1]3:19:53.2 +41:30:30 21.19± 0.09 23.75± 0.10 24.85± 0.06 24.23± 0.07 2.6 [0.9, 4.3] 11.0 [6.67, 14.9]

the optical emission was <100 Myr. In paper I clusters were se-lected based on their optical properties. In this paper young com-pact clusters and the clumpy stellar streaks are selected by their UVproperties.

Figure 3 shows color-magnitude diagrams (CMD) of the com-pact star clusters described in Section 2. All magnitudes and colorshave been have been corrected for foreground reddening, as indi-cated by the subscript zeros. Evolutionary SSP tracks for a clusterwith mass 2 × 104 M, with solar and half solar metallicity andwith and without emission lines, are overplotted. The numberedpoints represent the location of the model SSPs at ages of 1 Myr, 3Myr, 5 Myr, 7 Myr, 10 Myr, and 20 Myr. The majority of clustershave a very blue (F140LP-F550M)0 color, and lie in a narrow rangeof values. This plot suggests that these clusters are very young andhave similar ages despite being located in physically separated re-gions around NGC 1275. A wider range of ages is inferred from theoptical-only CMD. Note that the tracks in the FUV-optical CMD

show a simple stellar population (SSP) evolving diagonally acrossthe plot, whereas the tracks in the optical-only CMD go back andforth over the same color range, this is due to the contributions ofthe line emission and red and blue super-giant (RSG/BSG) popula-tions to the F435W and F625W filters; (F140LP-F550M)0 is muchmore effective at discriminating ages of young star clusters than(F435W-F625W)0.

Figure 4 shows the (F140LP-F550M)0 versus (F550M-F625W)0 colors. The colors are foreground reddening-corrected,and the points and tracks are colored the same as those in Figure 3.The very red (F550M - F625W)0 colors of those clusters lying nearthe 3 Myr age indicate the presence of strong emission lines, extinc-tion alone cannot account for the positions of these clusters. Emis-sion lines are present in the F625W and F435W filters, whereas theF550M filter is dominated by stellar continuum. If line emissionwere absent, the evolutionary tracks would not extend off to theright, to the redder (F550M - F625W)0 colors. Instead, the curves

c© 0000 RAS, MNRAS 000, 000–000

Filamentary Star Formation in NGC 1275 7

−0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0(F550M - F625W)0 (mag)

−5.0

−4.5

−4.0

−3.5

−3.0

−2.5

−2.0

−1.5

−1.0

−0.5

(F14

0LP

-F

550M

) 0(m

ag)

AV = 0.5

13

5

7

10

20

13

5

71020

1

3

5

7

10

20

Z0.5 ZZ, no gas

Northwest Region

Southern Filament

Blue Loop

−0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0(F550M - F625W)0 (mag)

−5.0

−4.5

−4.0

−3.5

−3.0

−2.5

−2.0

−1.5

−1.0

−0.5

(F14

0LP

-F

550M

) 0(m

ag)

AV = 0.5

13

5

7

10

20

13

5

71020

1

3

5

7

10

20

Z0.5 ZZ, no gas

Northwest Region

Southern Filament

Blue Loop

Figure 4. Color-color plots of the star forming sites with foreground reddening corrections applied. The left panel shows the young clusters at the ‘cometaryhead’ and the right panel the stellar streaks forming the ‘cometary tail’ of emission. Points are the same as in Figure 3. Blue dashed and dotted lines areevolutionary tracks corresponding to solar and half solar metallicity SEDs respectively, with mass 2× 104 M (lowering the mass of the cluster has no effecton the color) and the orange solid line indicates the tracks for a solar metallicity model without line emission. The numbered points on each track representthe location of an SSP of age 1, 3, 5, 7, 10, and 20 Myr.

3h19m51s52s53s54s

RA (J2000)

+4130′00′′

10′′

20′′

30′′

Dec

(J20

00)

5 kpc

6.30

6.45

6.60

6.75

6.90

7.05

7.20

log(

Age

/yr)

3h19m46s47s48s49s

RA (J2000)

+4131′36′′

42′′

48′′

54′′

32′00′′

Dec

(J20

00)

5 kpc

6.30

6.45

6.60

6.75

6.90

7.05

7.20

log(

Age

/yr)

Figure 5. Ages of star clusters overplotted on a section of the F435W image which contains the Blue Loop (left) and the Northern Region (right).

would be roughly vertical, beginning at (F550M - F625W)0 . 0.Some clusters are present just off this location, close to the no-gastrack in Figure 4. Either these clusters have no emission-line gasassociated with them but a significant extinction, or they have lineemission at a lower level. Figure 2 supports this scenario; some ofthe compact young star clusters appear associated with Hα emis-sion and some are not, in every region. A fraction of the youngclusters even appear to coincide with symmetrical overdensities inthe Hα emission, suggesting that the clusters may be producingHII regions. This would lend credence to our derived ages of <10Myr for many of the clusters. However, we do not claim that thelarger-scale emission-line filaments are produced via photoioniza-tion. Nonetheless, we do suggest that the young stellar component

in the outer regions of NGC 1275 is physically connected to theemission-line filaments.

Figure 5 shows the locations of our star clusters, color-codedfor age, plotted on F435W cutouts of the Blue Loop and NorthwestRegion, respectively. We do not show the Southern Filament be-cause only one compact source was identified in that region. In theBlue Loop, compact sources have an age range of ∼2 to 20 Myr,with an average age of 4.8 Myr, and a mass range of ∼ 5 × 103 to6× 104 M, with an average mass of 2.2× 104 M. In the North-west Region, the compact sources have an age range of ∼2 to 11Myr, with an average of 4.4 Myr, and a mass range of ∼ 6× 103 to4×104 M, with an average mass of 1.6×104 M. The SouthernFilament cluster has an age of 4.7 Myr and a mass of 1.8×104 M.

c© 0000 RAS, MNRAS 000, 000–000

8

−5.0 −4.5 −4.0 −3.5 −3.0 −2.5 −2.0 −1.5 −1.0

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

F55

0M0

(mag

)

Northwest Region

−5.0 −4.5 −4.0 −3.5 −3.0 −2.5 −2.0 −1.5 −1.0(F140LP - F550M)0 (mag)

Southern Filament

Diffuse Sources

Star Clusters

−5.0 −4.5 −4.0 −3.5 −3.0 −2.5 −2.0 −1.5 −1.0

Blue Loop

Figure 6. FUV-optical CMDs of star clusters (solid circles) and diffuse sources (open squares) in the Northwest Region (left), Southern Filament (center), andBlue Loop (right). The redder colors of the diffuse regions as compared to the star clusters imply older ages that can be estimated via comparisons to the SSPmodels in Figure 3. The F550M filter excludes strong emission lines, and the stellar streaks are offset from the Hα filaments, so the redder diffuse color is notcontaminated by line emission.

5 PROPERTIES OF STELLAR STREAKS

As noted in Section 2, diffuse UV emission accompanies the starclusters in all three regions. The regions contain both very diffuseemission, presumably from star clusters which have been dispersed,and more concentrated stellar streaks with compact star clusters attheir ‘heads’ (see section 4) and more diffuse emission in the ‘tails’.

As mentioned in paper I and can be seen in Figure 2 the ‘tails’of the UV streaks do not typically coincide with the Hα emission-line filaments which surround NGC 1275. They share a similarmorphology but are typically offset from the ionized gas and onlyappear to occur in these three disparate regions; the Blue Loop,Northwest Region and Southern Filament, whilst the Hα filamentsystem extends in all projected directions from NGC 1275. The fil-aments have typical velocities of order 50-100 km s−1 (Hatch et al.2005; Lim et al. 2012), and the rotational velocity of NGC 1275 isof order 400 km s−1 . For the stars to remain cospatial with the fil-aments in our observations (a few pixels with a pixel scale of SBC≈0.03”∼10pc) we infer the age must be less than ∼1×106 yrs.Therefore we may expect to see Hα associated with the youngestclusters, as is observed, but not with the older clusters which weexpect to be decoupled from the filaments. This suggests the ‘tails’may consist of more evolved stellar populations than the ‘heads’.

The streaks are orientated, in all regions, with the compactstar cluster at the ‘head’, at the farthest projected distance from thegalaxy center, and the ‘tails’ orientated towards the galaxy center,indicating balistic motion either away from or falling back towardsthe galaxy center. The color of the streak tails is significantly red-der (see Figure 6, by an average of 0.76 magnitudes) and has alarger scatter than that of the clusters. The F550M filter does notinclude any strong emission lines, and as mentioned above they aretypically offset from the Hα filaments, so the redder colors do notarise from emission line contamination. The tails are by definitionlarger in size than the clusters, which accounts for the enhancedbrightness of some of the diffuse sources. Only in the NorthwestRegion do the tails have comparable (F140LP-F550M)0 colors tothe star clusters, but even here they average 0.33 magnitudes red-der than the clusters. These more diffuse stellar populations mayhave formed outside of star clusters or originated in star clustersthat rapidly dissolved. The latter scenario could explain the largerscatter in color of the diffuse sources, due to the presence of less

massive, and presumably older, stars (Tremonti et al. 2001; Chan-dar et al. 2005).

Assuming SSP models, ages of the tails range from a few toa ∼50 Myr, with an average age of ∼8 Myr, thus they tend to beolder than the compact star clusters (see Figure 7). They have stel-lar masses in the range of a few 103 to 106 M with a total massin all regions in the range 1×107-8.6×107 M. Very recent starformation, at a rate of a few to∼13 M yr−1, has taken place overthe three distinct regions. These estimates are derived under the as-sumption that the diffuse regions do not systematically experiencemore interstellar obscuration due to dust than the star clusters, how-ever, we note here that the best fit average extinction of the diffuseregions is twice that of the compact clusters (E(B − V ) ∼ 0.08)which, while not a significant effect, may be biasing our ages forthe diffuse clusters marginally low. We note also that each of the‘tails’ are unlikely to be a SSP and probably consist of stars with arange of ages, with a significant contribution to the blue light fromthe youngest stars. This is highlighted by the color-color plot inFigure 4 which shows that for the ‘tails’ the data points are redderthan the SSP models allow. The redder colors may also be due toa much greater level of extinction in the tails of the streaks com-pared with the heads but this seems unlikely due to the large radiusfrom the center of the galaxy and offset from the gaseous filaments.The stellar populations making up the ‘tails’ are likely formed fromstellar populations of stars ranging from a few to ∼50 Myrs. Thetotal mass in the stellar streaks is of the order ∼5×106 M in theBlue Loop and Southern Filament, and ∼106 M in the NorthwestRegion, a factor of 10 larger than the mass in the compact clus-ters. A very diffuse component to the FUV emission also exists sothe mass of young stars estimated in these regions is a lower limit.This is consistent with a picture whereby the tails of the streaks aremade up of older stars as proposed in Paper I. However, large er-rors in the age estimations, due to the lack of a UV filter, meant theauthors were unable to detect an age gradient.

To investigate whether an age gradient exists along the stellarstreaks, we measure the fluxes in the four HST bands in apertures ofradius 0.2” along selected streaks in all three regions. Many streaksare inherently clumpy, complicating the definition of the “head”and “tail” of the streak. The best examples of smooth stellar streaksare observed in the Blue Loop region. No aperture corrections are

c© 0000 RAS, MNRAS 000, 000–000

Filamentary Star Formation in NGC 1275 9

6.0 6.5 7.0 7.5 8.0log(tage/yr)

3.5

4.0

4.5

5.0

5.5

6.0

6.5

log(M/M

)

Northwest Region - Diffuse

Northwest Region - Clusters

Southern Filament - Diffuse

Southern Filament - Clusters

Blue Loop - Diffuse

Blue Loop - Clusters

mF140LP = 22

Figure 7. Masses and ages of star clusters (solid points) and diffuse sources(open points). The blue squares are sources in the Northwest Region, thegreen triangles are sources in the Southern Filament, and the red circles aresources in the Blue Loop. The solid line shows a detection limit of F140LP= 22.0 magnitudes, which shows how star clusters fade as they age. Theclumping of ages is an artifact of the fitting method, see section 3.

performed. We are interested in whether there is a relationship be-tween distance along the streak and the color of emission, not abso-lute magnitudes. In addition, our apertures are much larger than thePSF and the star clusters, so aperture corrections should not affectour conclusions. Figure 8 shows the results of this photometry withthe ‘heads’ of the streaks at a distance of zero, note however theapertures used here are larger than those used in the stellar clus-ter analysis. Though an age gradient may exist in the Blue Loopand Southern Filament, the errors in photometry are still too largeto confirm a gradient for many of the streaks. However, within thesame streaks the heads are approximately one mag bluer than thetails across all regions. These color differentials suggest the tailsare not simply debris from the clusters at the heads of the streaks.

6 DISCUSSION

The Hα filaments, some as long as ∼70 kpc, are distinctive featuresof the LVS of NGC 1275, the central galaxy in the Perseus cluster.The filaments are multi-phase structures, readily detected via lineemission from the ∼104−6 M of ionized gas (e.g., Conselice,Gallagher & Wyse 2001) but also concealing ∼ 5×1010 M ofmolecular gas within 50 kpc of the nucleus (Salome et al. 2011).Despite this large cold gas reservoir, only three disparate regions ofthe filamentary system support high levels of star formation, whilethe majority of filaments remain relatively quiescent (Conselice,Gallagher & Wyse 2001; Hatch et al. 2006; Johnstone et al. 2012).

The morphologies and exceedingly young ages of the starforming regions studied here, suggest that the stellar streaks mustbe formed in situ from the filaments. Our FUV analysis furthershows that when star formation does occur, it takes place rapidly.We find well organized features delineated by stellar populationswith ages of 650 Myr and with typical ages of only a few Myr inthe bright compact clusters. The three regions studied have remark-

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700

Distance Along Streak (pc)

−1.5

−1.0

−0.5

0.0

0.5

1.0

Nor

mal

ised

(F14

0LP

-F

550M

) 0(m

ag)

Northwest Region

Southern Filament

Blue Loop

Figure 8. Normalised HST color (F140LP - F550M) gradient along fivestreaks. The blue lines are for three streaks in the Blue Loop, the green lineis for one streak in the Southern Filament, and the red lines are for twostreaks in the Northern Region.

ably similar blue colors with little scatter so are all currently form-ing stars. Paper I, using optically detected clusters, showed that thestar formation in these filaments had an age <100 Myrs but theoptical colors were unable to constrain the ages better than this.These optically detected clusters lie in the ‘streaks’ discussed herewith ages of less than or a few 10’s of Myrs. A model for the outerstar formation in NGC 1275 will need to explain the dichotomy be-tween the quiescent and star forming filaments, the disparate natureof the star formation, as well as the details of the star formation pro-cess. In this section we present first steps towards addressing theseissues.

6.1 Quiescent Filaments

The majority of the filaments in the NGC 1275 LVS, are quies-cent. The filaments are likely to be products of disturbances pro-duced in a high pressure, multi-phase interstellar medium by buoy-ant bubbles of relativistic plasma produced by the central AGN(e.g., Fabian et al. 2003). Lifetimes for filaments are estimated to be≈108 Myr based on crossing times derived from their ∼200 km s−1

peculiar velocities with respect to the center of NGC 1275 and onbubble rise times derived from observations of holes in the X-raygas (Dunn, Fabian & Taylor 2005).

The existence of dense gas filaments is puzzling given the lo-cation of NGC 1275 at the center of the Perseus galaxy cluster, withits high pressure, hot intracluster medium (e.g., Fabian et al. 2000).Filament survival for at least a dynamical time scale is not under-stood, but requires that the filament gas can cool with sufficient ef-ficiency as to prevent rapid evaporation. Thus Fabian et al. (2008)emphasize the importance of magnetic fields in defining and alsoinsulating the filaments from excessive conductive heating fromthe surrounding hot gas. Some heating by the hot gas, however,does take place (e.g. Ferland et al. 2009), and may also contributeto the large measured turbulent velocities, e.g., σ ≈50-100 km s−1

that are observed within the inner filaments (Hatch et al. 2006; Sa-lome et al. 2008a,b). It should be noted, however, that the turbulent

c© 0000 RAS, MNRAS 000, 000–000

10

Figure 9. Chandra X-ray surface brightness image from (Fabian et al.2011a) with the average at each radius subtracted overlaid with contours ofHα emission (magenta; (Conselice, Gallagher & Wyse 2001)) and youngstar forming regions (green; this study). The X-ray bubbles blown by theAGN are seen as dark depressions in the X-ray surface brightness image.The center of NGC 1275 is at coordinates 49.9507, 41.5118.

velocities must include the effects of observing multiple filamentthreads in projection.

We therefore hypothesize that the existence of filaments inNGC 1275 requires special conditions. An increase in power ab-sorbed per unit mass over time or loss of shielding magnetic fieldsin the filaments could result in evaporation and disruption. On theother hand if cooling triumphs, star formation could result.

While young stellar populations exist within the central∼15 kpc, in NGC 1275, these clusters are significantly older thanthe populations detected in the filaments at radii>15 kpc, and theirspatial distribution does not correlate with that of the filaments(Carlson et al. 1998; Canning et al. 2010; Penny, Forbes & Con-selice 2012). Observations of the distribution of young stars rela-tive to the ionized filaments suggests a simple model: Heating dom-inates for the inner filament system, preventing star formation, andit is only in the outer regions of NGC 1275 that some filaments canbecome unstable against large scale star formation.

In suggesting this empirical model, we are putting aside the is-sue of the longer term evolution of non-star forming filaments. Dothese systems evaporate, or fall back into the galaxy to be mixedinto new filaments by turbulent processes? Since star formation oc-curs in only a minority of filaments, some process in addition tostar formation must limit the radial extent of the LVS filaments.

6.2 Filaments and Star Formation

6.2.1 External Perturbations

The ICM is not static; bulk sloshing motions which spiral to largeradii can be seen as spirals in the intracluster medium X-ray sur-face brightness, in the spectacular, deep Chandra X-ray images pre-sented in Fabian et al. (2011a). The sloshing motions are likely dueto a subcluster merger or interaction and can persist in the ICM fora very long time (for a review, see Markevitch & Vikhlinin 2007).However, the bulk motions do not appear to be effective triggers ofstar formation in the filaments as shown by the radial extent of thefilaments, smooth radial velocity measurements (Hatch et al. 2006)and long lifetimes.

Rising relativistic gas bubbles might also affect pre-existingfilaments, possibly leading to star formation. Figure 9 shows theprojected spatial correspondence between the X-ray surface bright-ness, ionised gas filaments, and UV emission in the three regionsunder study. The correlation between the ionised gas filaments andthe star formation is obvious, but any correlation of these featureswith the X-ray bubbles is less clear: In the southeast, the centre ofthe Blue Loop coincides spatially with a depression in the X-rayimage. The expansion of this bubble underneath the ionised gascould be triggering compression and star formation along a fila-ment. However, no clear correspondence of SF with the X-ray bub-bles is observed in the Northwest Region or Southern Filament.The star formation in the Southern Filament is slightly offset fromnearby ionised gas filaments, and is confused with the large innerbubbles which dominate the X-ray signatures in this region, whilein the Northwest the star formation is not clearly associated withany bright dense regions of X-ray gas, although X-ray depressionsare apparent to the east, west, and south. It is also important tonote that we do not know the projection angles of the ionised fil-aments or of the star-forming regions. Additionally, little scatterexists in the ages of the compact stellar features across all regions,with star formation switching on<50 Myrs ago, suggesting a com-mon mechanism disrupted the three filaments. Estimated rise timesfor the large southern-most bubble preceding the blue loop, andthe large bubbles still connected to the nucleus (see Fig. 9) dif-fer by close to order of magnitude being 75 Myrs and 15 Myrsrespectively (Dunn, Fabian & Sanders 2006). If separate genera-tions of X-ray bubbles were responsible for the star formation thiswould lead to detectable variations in the ages of the clusters ineach region. However, estimations of bubble rise times can havelarge uncertainties from projection effects. Additionally these bub-bles use different methods to estimate their age as the inner bub-bles are still connected to the nucleus. The buoyancy timescale isused for the outer bubbles and the sound speed timescale (an expan-sion timescale) for the inner bubbles (see Dunn, Fabian & Sanders2006).

Weak shocks, from the generation of the bubbles, are appar-ent in the X-ray gas and could simultaneously disrupt the filaments.The straight edge running northwest through the Northwest Regionmay be caused by a weak shock in the gas from the inflation of thebubbles. The projected distance from the nucleus of ∼25 kpc wouldrequire a transport process travelling at ∼1000 km s−1 to synchro-nise the star formation to tens of Myrs. A shock in the hot X-raygas might reach these velocities. However, a shock would compressthe gas along the shock front, not perpendicular to it and shouldhave disrupted also the inner regions of the filaments leading to agradient in age with distance from the nucleus, we don’t find anyevidence for this in our data.

While the structure of NGC 1275 resembles that of late

c© 0000 RAS, MNRAS 000, 000–000

Filamentary Star Formation in NGC 1275 11

Figure 10. The “Snake’ (49.9408, 41.5527)’ (left) and a section of the Blue Loop (49.9706, 41.5027) (right) in F435W and F140LP emission. Starformation in stellar streaks occurs in clumps with a projected periodicity of ∼0.3-0.5 arcsec (105-175pc).

phase field E-galaxy merger products with shell-like features (e.g.,Schweizer 1998), these features are unlikely to originate from sim-ple gas-rich mergers. Wet mergers with the BCG are unlikely due tothe high velocity dispersions in massive, low redshift galaxy clus-ters; the active star formation in NGC 1275 probably does not resultfrom the kinds of processes occurring in wet mergers of field galax-ies (Monaco et al. 2006; Conroy, Wechsler & Kravtsov 2007). Anexternal perturbation such as disruption of pre-existing filamentsby a passing galaxy or dark matter clump is not a likely mecha-nism for producing the outer young stellar filaments. Any effectsfrom such collisions, such as tidal compression, should be local-ized around the site of the interaction, which might affect regionsin a few filaments, but not yield large coherent features. Tidal de-bris from an infalling star-forming galaxy, as in the high veloc-ity emission line system (HVS), would likely produce more spa-tially localized and disturbed young stellar structures than what weobserve. Furthermore, the galaxy responsible for the tidal debrisshould be observable. Aside from the obvious presence of a galaxyin the HVS, the debris from which is unrelated to the regions we arestudying, no candidate impactor has been found that could simulta-neously lead to star formation in the southeast, south and northwestof NGC 1275.

6.2.2 Internal Instabilities

As discussed in Paper I, the structure of the young stellar streaksis suggestive of coherent motions. We also note that the streakswithin a given region tend to be parallel to one another, as ex-pected if the stellar streaks are moving along similar paths. Withour more accurate age estimates, we can estimate the minimumvelocity of the streaks if they are associated with progressive starformation. Projected streak lengths are ∼0.7-1.5 kpc, which givesvproj ≈ 30/t∗(20) to 60/t∗(20) km s−1, where t∗(20) is the stel-lar population age range in units of 20 Myr.

This suggests that the speeds of the young stars could beslower than the 100-200 km s−1 radial velocities measured forouter filaments by Hatch et al. (2006). Paper 1 discusses the pos-sibility that once stars form in the filaments, they can no longerbe supported by gas and/or magnetic pressure. If star-forming fila-ments stall in the outer parts of NGC 1275, stars and star clusterscould begin to fall back towards NGC 1275, forming the stellar

streaks we observe. Another possibility is that the streaks repre-sent the outward velocities of the gas filaments, but in either casethe parallel streaks within the regular large scale patterns of starformation indicate that the filaments responsible for star formationretained much of their initial structure during the star formationprocess, implying that star formation was not triggered by a disrup-tive process.

We first consider the possibility that the star formation is dueto perturbations propagating along filaments. Our GALEV modelsshow that the spread in star cluster ages is 50 Myr. Assuming afilament length of 10 kpc, any triggering perturbation would needto propagate along the filament at speeds of >200 km s−1 . Thesound speed for gas with 104 K, typical of the ionized componentof the filaments, is ≈15 km s−1 , while in the cold dense moleculargas (T∼100 K) the sound speed is ∼2 km s−1 . Any disturbancepropagating along a filament with sufficient speed to produce theobserved small range in stellar ages would need to be highly super-sonic and would lead to observable shock line diagnostics whichare not seen.

Ferland et al. (2009) and Fabian et al. (2011b) suggest that ifthe excitation of the filaments in NGC 1275 is from energetic parti-cles in the hot gas impacting and mixing with the cool and cold gasphases, these particles may lose energy and remain in the filament.In this way the filaments, which were initially seeded through gasuplift, may grow in mass by up to 100 M yr−1. Filaments maythen grow in mass to the point where they become Jeans unstableand fragmentation of the filament leads to massive star formation.However, near simultaneous growth of only three disparate fila-ments is again difficult to place within this scenario, we might in-stead expect to observe continuous outer halo star formation acrossall the filaments.

A very rough periodicity exists in the spacing of the streaksalong a filament, with typical spacings of ∼1 kpc. This patternresembles the “beads-on-a-string” distribution of star formationalong spiral arms, which result from large-scale gravitational in-stabilities (Elmegreen & Elmegreen 1983; Kim & Ostriker 2006).On smaller scales, some stellar streaks contain several star clus-ters, also spaced at somewhat regular intervals of roughly 100 pc(∼0.3 arcsec), though projection effects make it difficult to mea-sure the exact wavelength of perturbations. Figure 10 illustrates thisperiodicity with close up F435W and F140LP images of two such

c© 0000 RAS, MNRAS 000, 000–000

12

streaks, the “Snake”, as mentioned in Section 2, and part of theeastern side of the Blue Loop. Similar periodic structures are alsoseen in nearby star forming filaments such as the ‘Nessie Nebulae’(Jackson et al. 2010). Modelling the filaments as infinite, isother-mal cylinders, supported by thermal pressure in the gas, with a cen-tral density 104 cm−3 , the periodicity of star formation is expectedto be <10 pc (Chandrasekhar & Fermi 1953; Nagasawa 1987),which would not be observable in our data. Magnetic fields andturbulence in the filaments can add support and increase the maxi-mally unstable wavelength. If turbulent support dominates then tur-bulent motions of ∼17 km s−1 are required for the observed clus-ter spacing. This is comparable to the limit of current observationswhich are limited by the beam size, however, high spatial resolu-tion observations may allow us to quantify the turbulent pressuresupport in these structures. NGC 1275 is at the limit of observabil-ity by ALMA. These structural features indicate that gravitationalinstabilities within filaments are playing a key role in the outer starformation in NGC 1275, although the dynamics of substructure for-mation likely differs between spiral arms and filaments (e.g., Shetty& Ostriker 2006).

6.3 Star Formation in Unstable Filaments

We therefore consider models where stars form in response to theoverall evolution of some gas filaments. Our conceptual model as-sumes that the ionized gas filaments maintain their identities as theyexpand outward from the center of NGC 1275. This assumption isconsistent with the structures of ionized filaments observed in highangular resolution Hubble Space Telescope images, with dynam-ical models for filament formation associated with rising bubblesof relativistic material ejected from the AGN (Fabian et al. 2003;Hatch et al. 2006; Fabian et al. 2008), as well as with models in-voking large scale turbulence within NGC 1275 to organize matterinto filaments (Falceta-Goncalves et al. 2010; Fabian et al. 2011b).

Ionized gas within filaments located in the main body ofNGC 1275 frequently has large internal velocity dispersions (σ ≈50− 100 km s−1 ), while in the outer galaxy dispersions appear todrop to σ ∼20 km s−1 (Hatch et al. 2006). Whilst confusion withmultiple filament threads may play a significant role here, one ex-planation for this behavior is that gas filaments in the inner galaxyare stabilized against star formation by their high internal velocitydispersions perhaps maintained by the heating and turbulence gen-erated by the radio mode AGN. Those filaments that reach the outergalaxy with low internal velocity dispersions and sufficient molec-ular masses may be subject to gravitational collapse along the fil-ament, which leads to star formation. Several conditions must besatisfied for this to occur, including a sufficient mass density, anability for the molecular gas to cool to temperatures typical of star-forming regions (<100 K), and that magnetic pressure does not pre-vent collapse. Zhuravleva et al. in prep. explore the X-ray surfacebrightness fluctuations in the core of the Perseus cluster and findstronger fluctuations towards the center possibly indicating higherturbulence at smaller radii (see also Zhuravleva et al. 2014; Gaspariet al. 2014). The forthcoming Astro-H satellite will be instrumentalin constraining turbulent motions in galaxy clusters.

The collect-and-collapse mechanism for star formation in ex-panding shells (Elmegreen & Lada 1977) has some features in com-mon with such a filament. As an expanding shell sweeps up gasfrom the surrounding medium, it can become gravitationally un-stable against star formation (Dale et al. 2009). These instabilitiescause the shell to break up into clumps of gas, but the end resultdepends on the relative mass in these structures. If there is suf-

ficient mass density in the perturbed regions, near-simultaneousstar formation can occur in the shell over short timescales. Thisphenomenon is seen, for example, in star formation associatedwith supershells in the Large Magellanic Cloud (e.g., Efremov &Elmegreen 1998), and in NGC 2146, where a central star forma-tion event has driven a shell into the surrounding dense molecularmedium, causing the formation of a ring of star clusters (Adamoet al. 2012).

In NGC 1275, however, the filaments expand into the hot, lowdensity ICM, which prevents them from sweeping up a substantialgas mass. The standard shell instability probably does not apply.Fortunately, the case of a thin gaseous shell expanding into a highpressure, low density medium has also been studied (Dale et al.2009). Due to the presence of the hot ICM, the pressure withina ∼75 kpc radius around NGC 1275 stays constant to within afactor of ∼2 (Fabian & Sanders 2007). We can qualitatively con-sider whether a pressure-induced instability might apply in an outerNGC 1275 gaseous filament where the internal velocity disper-sion is low. While models refer to spherical shells dominated bythermal gas pressure, the filaments around NGC 1275 experienceexternally-driven heating and turbulent velocities (e.g., Fabian et al.2011b), as well as substantial magnetic fields (Fabian et al. 2008;Taylor et al. 2006). A full theoretical study therefore is neededto see if this approach quantitatively applies to the situation inNGC 1275.

A massive, thin gaseous shell expanding into a vacuum that isinitially gravitationally stable may remain in this state. As the shellexpands, its density declines, which inhibits the growth of gravi-tational instabilities. Some combination of increased gas density,reduced expansion rate, and decreased pressure timescales is re-quired for the shell to break up into self-gravitating clumps, whichare potential sites for star formation. The pressure assisted grav-itational instability (PAGI; Wunsch et al. 2010, 2012; Dale et al.2009) is a possible candidate for producing self-gravitating sitesfor star formation from outer filaments in NGC 1275. In PAGI, theswept-up mass is assumed to be small, thereby reducing effects ofthe Vishniac instability so that the filament could remain in equi-librium with a substantial external pressure. Under these conditionseven a filament that is stretching as it moves outwards can sustaina constant or even decreasing thickness so as to meet the require-ment of pressure balance. Thus the filament density may not signif-icantly decrease relative to a freely-expanding thin shell, and mayeven increase. Higher gas densities in turn promote Jeans-types ofgravitational fragmentation with the passage of time.

Our initial picture for outer star formation in NGC 1275 is thata gaseous filament, perhaps with a denser or less turbulent molec-ular medium than in the majority of filaments in the main body ofNGC 1275, coasts radially outwards over a time scale of ∼108 yr .As a filament leaves the inner galaxy, a combination of factors canact to increase its density. One possibility is that the modest dropin density of the surrounding hot medium leads to PAGI, whichcould be aided by decreases in the gas temperature and turbulentvelocity within the outward moving filament. An additional fac-tor may come from filament dynamics. Filament expansion mayslow in the outer parts of NGC 1275 due to the galaxy’s gravita-tional potential. Thus the shear that occurs if a filament is beingstretched in radius, as in the Fabian et al. (2003) model for fila-ment interactions with rising bubbles of non-thermal radio-emittinglobes, would decrease. The magnetic field also may become less ofa factor over time. Once the gravitational instability becomes non-linear, the molecular gas dominating the filament mass breaks upinto classic “beads on a string”, producing roughly equally-spaced

c© 0000 RAS, MNRAS 000, 000–000

Filamentary Star Formation in NGC 1275 13

sites of star formation making streaks, within which the spaced outstar clusters are found. Star formation within the gravitationally un-stable region of a filament then occurs over time scales of tens ofMyr, leading to star forming sites being elongated into streak-likestructures.

6.4 Filaments and Stellar Halo Formation

Once stars form they will move on ballistic orbits within the grav-itational potential. Since the NGC 1275 filaments show at mostmodest signatures for rotational support, the resulting stellar or-bits will inherit low specific angular momentum and so may passthrough the main body of NGC 1275. Even so they will spend mostof their time in the outer parts of the galaxy. Thus in NGC 1275we observe the production of an outer stellar halo due to a specificmode of star formation, rather than from collisional stellar debrisassociated with galaxy-galaxy interactions. Our inferred star for-mation rate of ∼2-3 M yr−1 is sufficient to produce a significantstellar population around the main body of NGC 1275, providedthat the process will remain active for at least several hundred Myr.Many generations of X-ray bubbles are observed in NGC 1275; ifthese bubbles are responsible for depositing gas reservoirs in theoutskirts of the galaxy then this process has been occurring for>5×108 yr (Fabian et al. 2011a).

Is star formation and star cluster formation in gas filamentsarising from the interiors of galaxies a unique feature of BCGs inrich galaxy clusters? While similar gas filaments are found aroundmany giant elliptical galaxies with large X-ray halos and hostingpowerful radio-mode AGN, only in rich cool-core cluster BCGshave the filaments been found to extend beyond ∼10−15 kpc.These BCGs are surrounded by high pressure atmospheres and re-quire more powerful feedback from the AGN to balance the coolingX-ray gas. During galaxy formation, however, a pressurized exter-nal atmosphere may be supplied by infalling cosmic gas, and pow-erful AGN are more common. We therefore wonder if star forma-tion modes related to that seen in NGC 1275 could be important inproducing the stellar halos of galaxies with their systems of globu-lar clusters? Penny, Forbes & Conselice (2012) find an abundanceof ultra-compact dwarfs (UCDs) concentrated around NGC 1275in the Perseus cluster, at least two of which are associated with thefilaments (Penny et al. 2014). UCDs may be the high mass end ofGCs. They speculate that the bluest UCDs may be formed from theextensive filament system. The early formation of galaxies seemsan excellent opportunity to produce expanding shells and filamentsof dense gas that reach significant radii from their protogalacticcenters. Star formation in these systems could lead to dynamicallyhot, spatially extended stellar halos and globular cluster systems.

7 CONCLUSIONS

Our Hubble Space Telescope FUV observations of three outer re-gions (Rprojected ∼20-45 kpc) of NGC 1275, the luminous centralgalaxy in the Perseus cluster, confirm the presence of products ofrecent star formation with ages of 620 Myr. We find “streaks” ofyoung stars with typical size scales of <1 kpc. Embedded withinsome of these streaks are compact sources, which we find are con-sistent with moderately massive star clusters. The young star clus-ters and stellar streaks form filament-like, large-scale structures thatare spatially and morphologically correlated with, yet offset from,some of NGC 1275’s famous giant gas filaments, and therefore areassociated with the galaxy (i.e., they are in the low velocity system,

LVS). The 10 kpc scale Blue Loop is a prime example of this phe-nomenon. While the majority of the gas filaments in the main bodyof NGC 1275 appear to be free of significant star formation, a mi-nority of filaments evidently reached the outer zones of NGC 1275,where they produced galactic-scale star-forming structures with asurprising degree of coevality within each large scale structure.

Our data supplement an initial photometric analysis of the stel-lar populations in the young star clusters and stellar streaks pre-sented in Paper 1. We estimate the mass in stars formed in the ob-served areas during the past ∼10 Myr to be somewhat greater than107 M, implying a star formation rate of >2-3 M yr−1. Whilethis is a small fraction of the total star formation rate in NGC 1275,>10 M yr−1, it represents a substantial contribution to the stellarcontent of the galaxy’s outer halo. Only about 7 × 105 M, or lessthan 10% of the young stellar mass in the regions we observed, islocated in star clusters. Therefore, the cluster formation efficiencyin these regions appears to be typical for low intensity star-formingregions (e.g., Goddard, Bastian & Kennicutt 2010). However, it issurprising that some star clusters are being formed by gas injectioninto isolated regions with very low mass densities. Once stars form,any gas or magnetic pressure support are removed, suggesting thatthe young stars and star clusters will move ballistically in the grav-itational potential of NGC 1275 and the Perseus cluster core. Wesuggest that this dynamical effect produces the observed streaks ofstar formation, although we are unable to determine if the streaksrepresent an initial outward motion of the gas filament, or are dueto recently formed stars dropping out of a stalled gas filament andfalling inwards on ballistic orbits.

The combination of morphologies and coincident locationsdemonstrate that the star-forming regions studied here are con-nected to the Hα filaments in NGC 1275. These are likely to be en-ergized by the injection of over-pressured regions of relativistic par-ticles from the AGN, which produce expanding buoyant bubbles.The bubbles interact with the interstellar medium to produce densefilaments. The filaments in NGC 1275 frequently contain molecu-lar gas, and therefore are primed for star formation, but usually failto do so. We suggest that the lack of extensive star formation in themajority of filaments located within the main body of NGC 1275could be related to high internal turbulent velocities in combinationwith significant magnetic pressures.

Filaments that retain their molecular medium, expand out-wards, and slow down, in the nearly constant pressure ICM may be-come gravitationally unstable, especially if internal velocity disper-sions drop and magnetic fields cease to be dynamically dominant.This leads to circumstances akin to the pressure-assisted gravita-tional instability hypothesized to operate in thin shells, and couldlead to gravitational collapse and subsequent star formation. Thesituation in NGC 1275, however, is complex, e.g., due to the likelyimportance of magnetic fields in the inner filaments. Further studyis required to properly understand why some filaments are able toform stars while others do not, as well as why extensive star forma-tion appears to be a property of filaments that reach the outer partsof NGC 1275.

This type of mechanism, star formation in expanding shells orfilaments of material, might offer a method to produce dynamicallyhot stellar populations and star clusters in young galaxy halos, suchas globular star cluster systems. Since globular clusters are thoughtto have formed in the first few Gyr of the lifetime of a galaxy, theywould have been produced in an era when galaxies and their sur-roundings were gas rich and AGN activity levels were high. Thisenvironment seems a fertile ground for making stars and star clus-

c© 0000 RAS, MNRAS 000, 000–000

14

ters via mechanisms that we see operating today, albeit under verydifferent circumstances, in NGC 1275.

8 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank the referee for helpful comments. J.E. Ryon acknowl-edges the support of the National Space Grant College and Fel-lowship Program and the Wisconsin Space Grant Consortium.R.K. gratefully acknowledges nancial support from STScI theorygrant HST-AR-12840.01-A. Support for Program number HST-AR-12840.01-A was provided by NASA through a grant from theSpace Telescope Science Institute, which is operated by the Asso-ciation of Universities for Research in Astronomy, Incorporated,under NASA contract NAS5-26555. This research was supportedin part by grant GO-11207 from the Space Telescope Science Insti-tute.

REFERENCES

Adamo A. et al., 2012, MNRAS, 426, 1185Adams T. F., 1977, PASP, 89, 488Allen S. W., 1995, MNRAS, 276, 947Bertin E., Arnouts S., 1996, A&AS, 117, 393Bridges T. J., Irwin J. A., 1998, MNRAS, 300, 967Canning R. E. A., Fabian A. C., Johnstone R. M., Sanders J. S.,

Conselice C. J., Crawford C. S., Gallagher J. S., Zweibel E.,2010, MNRAS, 405, 115

Cappellari M. et al., 2012, Nat, 484, 485Cardelli J. A., Clayton G. C., Mathis J. S., 1989, ApJ, 345, 245Carlson M. N. et al., 1998, AJ, 115, 1778Chandar R., Leitherer C., Tremonti C. A., Calzetti D., Aloisi A.,

Meurer G. R., de Mello D., 2005, ApJ, 628, 210Chandrasekhar S., Fermi E., 1953, ApJ, 118, 116Conroy C., Wechsler R. H., Kravtsov A. V., 2007, ApJ, 668, 826Conselice C. J., Gallagher, III J. S., Wyse R. F. G., 2001, AJ, 122,

2281Dale J. E., Wunsch R., Whitworth A., Palous J., 2009, MNRAS,

398, 1537de Mello D. F., Smith L. J., Sabbi E., Gallagher J. S., Mountain

M., Harbeck D. R., 2008, AJ, 135, 548Dieball A., Knigge C., Zurek D. R., Shara M. M., Long K. S.,

Charles P. A., Hannikainen D., 2007, ApJ, 670, 379Donahue M., Mack J., Voit G. M., Sparks W., Elston R., Maloney

P. R., 2000, ApJ, 545, 670Dunn R. J. H., Fabian A. C., Sanders J. S., 2006, MNRAS, 366,

758Dunn R. J. H., Fabian A. C., Taylor G. B., 2005, MNRAS, 364,

1343Edge A. C., Wilman R. J., Johnstone R. M., Crawford C. S.,

Fabian A. C., Allen S. W., 2002, MNRAS, 337, 49Efremov Y. N., Elmegreen B. G., 1998, MNRAS, 299, 643Elmegreen B. G., Elmegreen D. M., 1983, MNRAS, 203, 31Elmegreen B. G., Lada C. J., 1977, ApJ, 214, 725Fabian A. C., Johnstone R. M., Sanders J. S., Conselice C. J.,

Crawford C. S., Gallagher, III J. S., Zweibel E., 2008, Nat, 454,968

Fabian A. C., Sanders J. S., 2007, in Heating versus Cooling inGalaxies and Clusters of Galaxies, Bohringer H., Pratt G. W.,Finoguenov A., Schuecker P., eds., p. 65

Fabian A. C. et al., 2011a, MNRAS, 418, 2154

Fabian A. C., Sanders J. S., Crawford C. S., Conselice C. J., Gal-lagher J. S., Wyse R. F. G., 2003, MNRAS, 344, L48

Fabian A. C. et al., 2000, MNRAS, 318, L65Fabian A. C., Sanders J. S., Williams R. J. R., Lazarian A., Ferland

G. J., Johnstone R. M., 2011b, MNRAS, 417, 172Falceta-Goncalves D., de Gouveia Dal Pino E. M., Gallagher J. S.,

Lazarian A., 2010, ApJ, 708, L57Ferland G. J., Fabian A. C., Hatch N. A., Johnstone R. M., Porter

R. L., van Hoof P. A. M., Williams R. J. R., 2009, MNRAS, 392,1475

Gaspari M., Churazov E., Nagai D., Lau E. T., Zhuravleva I.,2014, ArXiv e-prints: 1404.5302

Goddard Q. E., Bastian N., Kennicutt R. C., 2010, MNRAS, 405,857

Graham J. A., 1998, ApJ, 502, 245Hatch N. A., Crawford C. S., Fabian A. C., Johnstone R. M., 2005,

MNRAS, 358, 765Hatch N. A., Crawford C. S., Johnstone R. M., Fabian A. C., 2006,

MNRAS, 367, 433Hicks A. K., Mushotzky R., Donahue M., 2010, ApJ, 719, 1844Holtzman J. A. et al., 1992, AJ, 103, 691Hubble E., Humason M. L., 1931, ApJ, 74, 43Jackson J. M., Finn S. C., Chambers E. T., Rathborne J. M., Simon

R., 2010, ApJ, 719, L185Johnstone R. M., Canning R. E. A., Fabian A. C., Ferland G. J.,

Lykins M., Porter R. L., van Hoof P. A. M., Williams R. J. R.,2012, MNRAS, 425, 1421

Johnstone R. M., Hatch N. A., Ferland G. J., Fabian A. C., Craw-ford C. S., Wilman R. J., 2007, MNRAS, 382, 1246

Kennicutt, Jr. R. C., 1998, ARA&A, 36, 189Kim W.-T., Ostriker E. C., 2006, ApJ, 646, 213Kotulla R., Fritze U., Weilbacher P., Anders P., 2009, MNRAS,

396, 462Leroy A. K., Walter F., Brinks E., Bigiel F., de Blok W. J. G.,

Madore B., Thornley M. D., 2008, AJ, 136, 2782Lim J., Ohyama Y., Chi-Hung Y., Dinh-V-Trung, Shiang-Yu W.,

2012, ApJ, 744, 112Lynds R., 1970, ApJ, 159, L151Markevitch M., Vikhlinin A., 2007, Phys. Rep., 443, 1McDonald M. et al., 2012, Nat, 488, 349McDonald M., Veilleux S., Rupke D. S. N., Mushotzky R.,

Reynolds C., 2011, ApJ, 734, 95McNamara B. R., O’Connell R. W., Sarazin C. L., 1996, AJ, 112,

91McNamara B. R. et al., 2006, ApJ, 648, 164Meynet G., Maeder A., Schaller G., Schaerer D., Charbonnel C.,

1994, A&AS, 103, 97Minkowski R., 1955, Carnegie Yearbook, 54, 25Mittal R. et al., 2012, MNRAS, 426, 2957Monaco P., Murante G., Borgani S., Fontanot F., 2006, ApJ, 652,

L89Mould J. R. et al., 2000, ApJ, 536, 266Nagasawa M., 1987, Progress of Theoretical Physics, 77, 635O’Dea C. P., Baum S. A., Mack J., Koekemoer A. M., Laor A.,

2004, ApJ, 612, 131O’Dea C. P. et al., 2008, ApJ, 681, 1035O’Dea K. P. et al., 2010, ApJ, 719, 1619Oonk J. B. R., Hatch N. A., Jaffe W., Bremer M. N., van Weeren

R. J., 2011, MNRAS, 414, 2309Penny S. J., Forbes D. A., Conselice C. J., 2012, MNRAS, 422,

885

c© 0000 RAS, MNRAS 000, 000–000

Filamentary Star Formation in NGC 1275 15

Penny S. J., Forbes D. A., Strader J., Usher C., Brodie J. P., Ro-manowsky A. J., 2014, ArXiv e-prints: 1402.0687

Quillen A. C. et al., 2008, ApJS, 176, 39Rafferty D. A., McNamara B. R., Nulsen P. E. J., 2008, ApJ, 687,

899Rubin V. C., Oort J. H., Ford, Jr. W. K., Peterson C. J., 1977, ApJ,

211, 693Salome P. et al., 2006, A&A, 454, 437Salome P., Combes F., Revaz Y., Downes D., Edge A. C., Fabian

A. C., 2011, A&A, 531, A85Salome P., Combes F., Revaz Y., Edge A. C., Hatch N. A., Fabian

A. C., Johnstone R. M., 2008a, A&A, 484, 317Salome P., Revaz Y., Combes F., Pety J., Downes D., Edge A. C.,

Fabian A. C., 2008b, A&A, 483, 793Salpeter E. E., 1955, ApJ, 121, 161Sandage A. R., 1971, in Study Week on Nuclei of Galaxies,

O’Connell D. J. K., ed., pp. 271–+Sanders J. S., Fabian A. C., 2007, MNRAS, 381, 1381Schlegel D. J., Finkbeiner D. P., Davis M., 1998, ApJ, 500, 525Schweizer F., 1998, in Saas-Fee Advanced Course 26: Galaxies:

Interactions and Induced Star Formation, Kennicutt Jr. R. C.,Schweizer F., Barnes J. E., Friedli D., Martinet L., Pfenniger D.,eds., p. 105

Shetty R., Ostriker E. C., 2006, ApJ, 647, 997Shields J. C., Filippenko A. V., Basri G., 1990, AJ, 100, 1805Smith E. P. et al., 1992, ApJ, 395, L49Sparks W. B. et al., 2012, ArXiv e-printsSparks W. B., Pringle J. E., Donahue M., Carswell R., Voit M.,

Cracraft M., Martin R. G., 2009, ApJ, 704, L20Taylor G. B., Gugliucci N. E., Fabian A. C., Sanders J. S., Gentile

G., Allen S. W., 2006, MNRAS, 368, 1500Toomre A., 1977, ARA&A, 15, 437Tremblay G. R. et al., 2012, MNRAS, 424, 1042Tremonti C. A., Calzetti D., Leitherer C., Heckman T. M., 2001,

ApJ, 555, 322Tullmann R., Rosa M. R., Elwert T., Bomans D. J., Ferguson

A. M. N., Dettmar R.-J., 2003, A&A, 412, 69van den Bergh S., 1977, Astronomische Nachrichten, 298, 285van Dokkum P. G. et al., 2010, ApJ, 709, 1018Werk J. K., Putman M. E., Meurer G. R., Oey M. S., Ryan-Weber

E. V., Kennicutt, Jr. R. C., Freeman K. C., 2008, ApJ, 678, 888Wirth A., Kenyon S. J., Hunter D. A., 1983, ApJ, 269, 102Wunsch R., Dale J. E., Palous J., Whitworth A. P., 2010, MNRAS,

407, 1963Wunsch R., Jachym P., Sidorin V., Ehlerova S., Palous J., Dale J.,

Dawson J. R., Fukui Y., 2012, A&A, 539, A116Zhuravleva I. et al., 2014, ApJ, 788, L13

c© 0000 RAS, MNRAS 000, 000–000