FCH JU – Programme results

Jean-Luc DELPLANCKEHannover Messe 2015

European Climate and Energy Policy Framework

2

FromThe 20-20-20 goals by 2020:

20% increase in renewables20% increase in efficiency 20% decrease in GHG emissions

ToThe EU targets by 2030*

27% renewable energy 27% improvement of energy efficiency 40% reduction in GHG emissions

*European Council conclusions of 23/10/2014Joint Undertaking – Public Private Partnership Council Regulations:

521/2008 of 30 May 2008 (FP7)1183/2011 of 14 November 2011559/2014 of 6 May 2014 (H2020)

Overview

3

2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017

Councilregulation

Amend-ment

Auto-nomy

Call 2008

Call 2009

Call 2010

Call 2011

Call 2012

Calls 2013

16  Projects16  Projects28 Projects28 Projects

26 Projects26 Projects33 Projects33 Projects

27  Projects27  Projects25 Projects

3

Car powertrains study

Bus  study

Distributed power and heat study

7th Framework Program Horizon 2020

Councilregulation

Energy storage study

Electrolyser study

FCH sector trends study

155 Projects and 7 Studies under FP7

Decarbonising EU study

FP7 Projects

• 155 projects• 5 projects suspended

or terminated by the FCH JU (<4%)

• 42 projects with final report (<28%) among which 21 projects with final payment (<14%)

• 43 projects at mid-term stage (<28%)

To build a strong FCH community in Europe

1266 Participants 545 Beneficiaries:

192 Industries (35%) 154 SMEs (28%) 149 Research

Organizations (27%) 20 High Education

Institutions (4%) 30 Others (6%)

Industry32%

Others7%

SME27%

Research32%

Higher Education2%

Funding  of beneficiaries categories

To increase the interest in FCH technologies in the 28 EU Member States

22 Member Statesrepresented

Missing:IrelandLatviaSlovakiaMaltaCyprusLuxemburg

Non EU MS beneficiaries:CH, NO, IL, TR, IS, RS, CN, RU US

Transport pillar

Combined financial contribution: 147.3M€

Transport demonstration projects

4

46

597.4 M€44.7 M€

171.7 M€61.4 M€

37.9 M€18.2 M€

52.6 M€23.2 M€

Budget: total/financial contribution Number of projects funded

Cars Buses APUs MHV

Cars  

H2MOVES

HYTEC

SWARM

HyFIVE

2010 2013 2016

Increased fleets

Extended infrastructure

Reduction in vehicle cost

19 cars / 1 station

40 cars / 2 stations

90 cars / 3 stations

110 cars / 5 stations

CAR PERFORMANCE improvements

0,8

0,9

1

1,1

1,2

Baseline 2008 2014

Car fuel consumption (kgH2/100km)

‐13%

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

Baseline 2008 2014

Car range (km)

+ 100%

Buses

CHIC

HYTRANSIT

HIGH V.LO-CITY

2010 2013 2016

Reduction in fuel consumption

Geographical expansion

Reduction in vehicle cost

26 buses / 5 stations

6 buses / 1 station

14 buses / 2 stations

3EMOTION 21(+6) buses / 5 stations

BUS FC performance and costs

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

Baseline 2010 2014 2020 Target

Bus FC system cost (EUR/kW)

‐29%

0

5000

10000

15000

20000

25000

Baseline 2010 2014 2020 Target

Bus FC system lifetime (h)

+350%

BUS Performance and costs

0

5

10

15

20

25

Baseline 2010 2014 2020 Target

Bus fuel consumption (kgH2/100km)

‐55%

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

Baseline 2010 2014 2020 Target

Bus vehicle cost (kEUR)

‐ 40%

BUS AVAILABILITY AND CONSUMPTION

 6

 8

 10

 12

 14

 16

Jul 09 Nov 10 Apr 12 Aug 13 Dec 14 May 16

Average consum

ption 

(kg H2/10

0km)

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

Jul 09 Nov 10 Apr 12 Aug 13 Dec 14 May 16

Average availability 

APUs

DESTAFCGEN

SAPIENS

2010 2013 2016

PUREHYCARUSSAFARI

Technology readiness

Application identification

Truck /PEM

Truck /SOFC

RV /SOFCBoat /PEM

Airplane /PEM

Truck /SOFC

Key learnings from APU projects

• Trucks– Viability demonstrated: interest shown– Further development needed

• Airborne– UAV propulsion needs further development

• Current size and weight too high for UAVs to fly– APUs in airplanes: pending results

• Recreational vehicles– First (lab) results show viability of the design. Still

pending demonstration results• Boats

– System design ready. Pending demonstration results

MHVs

HyLIFT-DEMO

MobyPost

2010 2013 2016

HyLIFT-EUROPE

HAWL

System cost reduction

Increase in fleet size

Prove business model

10 FL / 1 Tow truck

200 MHV

200 FL

10 Postal Vehicles

MHV performance and costs

40%

45%

50%

55%

Baseline 2012 2014 2020 Target

MHV FC efficiency (%)

+ 4%

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

Baseline 2012 2014 2020 Target

MHV FC system cost (EUR/kW)

‐ 23%

Energy pillar

28 DEMO type projects– 12 Field Demonstration– 16 Proof-of-concept, components

diagnostics and control

Combined financial contribution: 88M€

Energy demonstration projects

MAIP CoverageVolumes

2010 2013 2016

Increased volumesIncreased volumesDifferent climates/technologies/routes‐to‐marketDifferent climates/technologies/routes‐to‐market

Cost reduction/Increased durabilityCost reduction/Increased durability

100 micro‐CHP units (1 manufacturer, 4 countries) 

1000 micro‐CHP units (9 manufacturers, 12 countries)

19 back‐up and UPS units (3 countries)

18 live Radio stations (off‐grid) in Italy

CLEARgen™Demo 1 MW industrial CHP unit /PEM based (in Europe – place tbc) 

POWER‐UP 500 kW industrial CHP unit/alkaline based (in Germany) 

1 MW alkaline electrolyser (coupled with wind energy, in Spain) 

Aus Datenschutzgründen wurde das automatische Herunterladen dieses Bilds von PowerPoint gesperrt.

Stationary FC Performance

MAIP Baseline

MAIP mid‐term Target 

MAIP long‐term Target 

0

10

20

30

40

50

2010 2015 2020

Stack Durab

ility (k

h)

Year

PEM Technology

MAIP Baseline

MAIP mid‐term Target 

MAIP long‐term Target 

051015202530354045

2010 2015 2020

Stack Durab

ility (k

h)

Year

SOFC Technology

Stationary FC costs

SOFC Baseline

SOFC Project Results

Long‐term Target

0

2000

4000

6000

8000

10000

12000

SOFC

 System Cap

ital Cost (EU

R/kW

)

‐ 58%

2008 2013 2020

SOFC MULTI-PERFORMANCE MATRIX

Durability

Electrical efficiency

Capital cost

AIP Target: 40 khProjects: 40kh

AIP Target: 45%

MAIP Target: 2000 EUR/kW

Projects’ avg result: 4000 EUR/kW

Projects’ avgresult: 48%

PEM Electrolyser Performance

PEM Baseline

PEM Project Results

USA

0,0

0,4

0,8

1,2

1,6

2,0

2,4

1

Electrolyser Current Den

sity 

(A/cm

2 )

2008 2012

30%

2014

PEM Baseline

PEM Project Results

0,0

0,5

1,0

1,5

2,0

2,5

3,0

3,5

1

Electrolyser Overall Pt Loa

ding

 (m

g/cm

2 )

2008

‐ 77%

2012

PEM Electrolyser STACK costs

PEM Baseline

PEM Project Results

Long‐term Targets

0

2000

4000

6000

8000

1

PEM Electrolyser S

tack Cost 

(EUR/Nm

3 /h)

2010 2012 2020

‐ 49%

FCH 2 JU under H2020

Two key activity pillars Budget of €1.33 billion in 2014 - 2020 Strong industry commitment to contribute inside the programme + through additional investment outside, supporting joint objectives.

Budget of €1.33 billion in 2014 - 2020 Strong industry commitment to contribute inside the programme + through additional investment outside, supporting joint objectives.

• Road vehicles• Non-road mobile

vehicles and machinery

• Refuelling infrastructure

• Maritime, rail and aviation applications

• Fuel cells for power and combined heat & power generation

• Hydrogen production and distribution

• Hydrogen for renewable energy generation (incl. blending in natural gas grid)

CROSS-CUTTING ISSUES(e.g. standards, consumer awareness,

manufacturing methods, studies)

TRANSPORT ENERGY

FCH 2 JU under Horizon 2020

• Members: IG / RG / EC• PPP structure• Implementation mainly through calls for

proposals or procurement studies• More demonstration and market uptake

(60% of FCH JU contribution)• In-kind contributions only from members

(or constituent entities)• At least 3 Member States involved in a

project (except support action)• Increased Cooperation with National

and Regional Initiatives

Industrial applications Residential CHP

Natural gas, biogas, coal, biomass

Renewable generation, storage and ‘buffering’

Methanisation feed to natural gas grid

Existing natural gas, electricity and transport infrastructures

FCH 2 JU objectives

Transport Feed to electricity grid

Reduction of production costs of long lifetime FC

systems to be used in transport applications

Increase of the electrical efficiency and durability of low

cost FCs used for power production

Increase the energy efficiency of low cost production of hydrogen from water electrolysis and renewable sources

By-product from Chemical Industry

Large scale use hydrogen to support integration of renewable energy sources into the energy systems

Reduce the use of critical raw materials

Connecting the European grids

Electricity grid Natural gas grid

Trans-European Transport Network

Thank you for your attention !

Further info :• FCH JU : http://fch-ju.eu• NEW-IG : http://www.new-ig.eu• N.ERGHY : http://www.nerghy.eu

31