Fatigue prognosis of slender chimneys considering long...
Transcript of Fatigue prognosis of slender chimneys considering long...
ABSTRACT: Industrial chimneys are sensitive to wind actions because of their high slenderness. For some notch connection
cases, the random load due to the stochastic wind action can produce fatigue problems. To consider the buffeting fatigue, the
Eurocode 1991-1-4 presents in Annex B a curve for the calculation of the load cycles that exceed a given value ∆S during a
period of 50 years. Long-term wind data recorded in northern Germany shows the appearance of six different wind profile
shapes. Using this information, an extensive Monte Carlo simulation has been carried out to calculate the influence of the wind
statistic on the fatigue life of industrial chimneys. The spectral information of the response has been introduced in Dirlik’s
method to obtain the probability distribution of the stress amplitudes. The damage has been compared with the formulation
presents in Eurocode 1 and the results show a clear difference between both approaches. The standard yields highly conservative
damage due to its large safety grade.
KEY WORDS: Wind speed statistics; Buffeting loading; Monte Carlo simulation; Dirlik method; Fatigue prognosis.
1 INTRODUCTION
Slender structures such as industrial chimneys are very
sensitive to wind actions. The characteristics of the structural
response depend on the dynamic structural amplification, thus
the frequency and damping, as well as the incident gusty wind
field. The statistical wind data given in the Eurocode 1 [4] and
in its corresponding national annexes are indispensable for all
wind design projects. Clobes and Willecke [1] analysed full
scale, long term data of the natural wind field measured on a
344 m high guyed mast located in northern Germany. They
showed that mean wind speed profiles in moderate wind speed
conditions differ from the commonly used logarithmic or
power law wind profiles presented in the standards. Thus, six
mean wind speed profile shapes were identified. The use of
those realistic wind profiles for an analysis of vortex
excitation of steel chimneys leads to a significant reduction in
overestimating fatigue damages compared to the currently
recommended in the Eurocode [1].
Starting from the conclusions made in [1] a refined fatigue life
prognosis of industrial chimneys in case wind buffeting has
been developed. Long-term full scale measurements of wind
speed have been used to obtain a wind speed and wind profile
shape-dependent standard deviation of σu(z). A correct
identification of this parameter is fundamental due to its high
importance on fatigue process. Using a Monte-Carlo
simulation, the fatigue life of steel chimneys to frequent gust
excitation is analysed. Synthetic wind profiles for wind speed
and turbulence intensity are generated using a robust
statistical model, based on the results presented in [1].
For each generated profile, the buffeting response of a 150 m
high steel chimney is individually calculated. In order to
evaluate the material fatigue, Dirlik’s formula [15] is used to
determine a stress cycle count of the chimney from the
spectral information of the bending moment. This information
is used to build load collectives during the design life of the
chimney. On the contrary to the Eurocode, load collectives
from site-dependent wind parameters and/or structural
characteristics of the structure are calculated. Their
applications to the design of this kind of structures show a
lower fatigue damage compared to the procedure of Eurocode.
2 CLASSIFICATION OF MEASUREMENTS
2.1 Classification of the mean wind speed
Since 1989 the Institute of Steel Structures of the Technische
Universität Braunschweig operates a wind monitoring system
located on the 344 m guyed mast Gartow II (northern
Germany). There, the mean wind speed ( )U z , the standard
deviation of the wind turbulence ( )u zσ , temperatures and the
wind directions have been measured over the entire height of
the mast [1],[2]. During this period low, moderate and high
winds have been measured. A neural network technique has
been used to classify the measured wind data in six different
wind shapes as in Figure 1 [2]. The results shows that the
power law class profile, which is used for the along-wind
buffeting, is the most frequent wind profile shape with a
frequency of occurrence of 55.9%. The constant shape has an
occurrence ratio of 29.9%, the linear 9% and the jets and the
sinus classes less than 3% [3].
For each profile class c a statistical description based on the
corresponding selected profiles has been derived. The Weibull
distributions of the mean wind speed have been calculated for
the different profile classes and different heights. Large values
of the shape parameter k ( 3.5k ≈ ) are obtained and therefore,
the probability distribution tends to a symmetrical shape over
Fatigue prognosis of slender chimneys considering long-term wind profile statistics
Hodei Aizpurua Aldasoro, Mathias Clobes, Klaus Thiele
Institute of Steel Structures, Technische Universität Braunschweig, Beethovenstrasse 51, 38106 Braunschweig , Germany
email: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Structural Dynamics, EURODYN 2014Porto, Portugal, 30 June - 2 July 2014
A. Cunha, E. Caetano, P. Ribeiro, G. Müller (eds.)ISSN: 2311-9020; ISBN: 978-972-752-165-4
1399
the mode being also well approximated by a Gauss
distribution.
Figure 1. Characteristic shapes of profile classes [1]
This allows for a description of the statistical characteristics in
terms of a mean vector Uµ and a covariance matrix
UCOV over the height only [2].
2.2 Classification of the turbulence intensity
In addition to the statistical classification of the mean wind
speed profiles, a definition of the wind turbulence is needed
for a refined analysis of structures under buffeting wind
loading. The vibrations induced by the gusty wind can be
amplified due the coincidence of the resonant frequency range
of the structure with the energy provided by the wind in the
frequency domain. The energy of the turbulent wind is a
broad-band process in comparison with the resonant response
of the most structures. It is defined in the spectral domain by
the power spectral density function uuS , which depends on
the standard deviation of the incoming turbulence ( )u zσ . The
turbulence grade is mathematically described by the
turbulence intensity ( )uI z , which is directly related to the
mean wind speed ( )U z and the standard deviation of the wind
speed fluctuations ( )u zσ :
( )
( )( )
uu
zI z
U z=
σ (1)
In the design codes a constant value of uσ over the height is
accepted. Its value depends on the terrain category and wind
zone. Using the classification of the profile classes c made in
[3], uσ is also classified inside the classes in terms of the
mean wind speed value.
Firstly, for each wind profile class c, the total measured
profiles ( )cU z are separated in wind speed ranges of U∆ = 5
m/s at 156 m height. Secondly, the standard deviation profiles
( )cu zσ , associated to the wind speed profiles classified on
each range iU∆ , are selected. Thirdly, from this set of
profiles ( )i
cu U
z ∆σ , the mean standard deviation value
( )i
cu U
z ∆σ over the height z is calculated. The results show
that the variable ( )i
cu U
z ∆σ does not vary over the height.
Finally, due to this argument it is possible to calculate cuσ
µ ,
defined as a mean standard deviation over the height for each
class c and wind speed range iU∆ .
Figure 2 shows the results of the evaluation of the wind
turbulence. Each profile class c is plotted in a different colour.
The rounded points inserted on the lines coincide with the
calculated mean value of cuσ
µ for the different wind speed
ranges. The lines between points have been plotted assuming
a linear relationship.
The duration in years of the long-term measurements used for
this work (about 20 years) has been not sufficient long to
measure extreme wind speeds. Therefore, the dotted lines
symbolize the supposed performance of uσ for high wind
speed ranges. The performance of the jet profiles is quite
strange reducing the standard deviation uσ even if
U increases. The power law profile, equivalent to the
logarithmic profile given in the design standards, tends to
confirm an equivalent value of uσ as in Eurocode for the
place of Gartow. The mast is located in close proximity to the
Elbe River and the surrounding area is covered with low
vegetation. Results provided in [2] suggest a direction-
dependent terrain category II or III.
Figure 2. Tendency of cuσ
µ with the mean wind speed at 156
m for the six different profile classes [9]
The blue circles in Figure 3 depict the calculated turbulence
intensity profiles ( )uI z following equation (1) for different
wind speed ranges. The green lines show the turbulence
intensity profiles for a terrain category II and III in EN 1991-
1-4 [4]. Except in cases of extreme low velocities, the values
of ( )uI z obtained in Gartow are well comparable with a
turbulence intensity profile for terrain category between II and
III. This fact was also observed by Willecke [3] without
differentiation of mean wind speed ranges.
Although the values of uσ given in the EC1 correspond to a
50 years wind situation, the tendency for lower velocities is
also well comparable due to the concordance of the turbulence
intensity profile ( )uI z . In case of wind profile classes
different than the power law class, these conclusions could be
not completely assumed.
Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Structural Dynamics, EURODYN 2014
1400
Figure 3. Discretization of the turbulence intensity profiles in
different speed ranges (power law class)
This classification helps to provide the standard deviation
value cuσ associated to a synthetic wind profile ( )cU z which
has been artificially generated using Uµ and the covariance
matrix U
COV . That has a huge advantage in the calculation
of the buffeting response of the chimney for low and moderate
winds. Usually, this loading case is calculated only in case of
extreme wind situations without focusing on a fatigue
calculation.
3 SIMULATION OF THE BUFFETING RESPONSE
3.1 Structural characteristics
In order to investigate the influence of realistic wind statistics
on the buffeting response of an industrial chimney, a 150 m-
tall steel chimney with constant circular cross section has been
studied. The dynamic analysis has been carried out in the
frequency domain using the finite element technique
developed in Matlab. The diameter is constant over the height
and the wall-thickness varies between 20 mm near the
foundation and 14 mm near the tip.
The total mass of the chimney is 148 tons including a 2% of
mass concerning the structural connections elements. From a
modal analysis, the two first frequencies are determined in
1 0.12f = Hz and 2 0.73f = Hz. For the structural damping, a
logarithmic decrement of 0.02=Λ is selected. This arbitrary
value of damping includes the material and assembly damping
components.
The mechanical damping matrix mechD is calculated using the
classical Rayleigh damping, where D is a linear combination
of the mass matrix M and stiffness matrix K:
mech = ⋅ + ⋅D M Kα β (2)
The aerodynamic damping aeroD is also considered in the
calculation. In many occasions, the aerodynamic damping is
often of the same order of magnitude as the structural
damping. This effect is higher as the wind speed increases and
also its importance to the structural damping, if the mass ratio
of the structure decreases. Therefore, it gives significant
response reductions for light structures such as steel chimneys
or lattice towers [5].
Figure 4. Structural properties
The aerodynamic damping is introduced in the damping
matrix in terms of a diagonal matrix. It is taken into account in
wind direction at the eleven nodes of the chimney, being
proportional to the mean wind speed.
1 11aero
1 11
diag(2 ,..., 2 )F F
U U= ⋅ ⋅D (3)
Fluctuations in across wind direction are not considered
during the calculation. Finally, the complex mechanical
transfer matrix ( )fH of the system depends on the mass
matrix M, the damping matrix D and the stiffness matrix K.
This function is defined in the frequency domain as:
2 1( ) ( (2π ) i (2π ) )f f f −= − ⋅ + ⋅ ⋅ +H M D K (4)
3.2 Generation of synthetic wind profiles
To study the fatigue prognosis of steel chimneys under
buffeting load using realistic wind conditions, the long-term
wind statistics obtained in Gartow has been used. As
explained in [1] and [2], the measured data show a high
variability over the height but also inside the same profile
class. Therefore, the mean wind speed- and profile class-
dependent value of uσ makes more logical the application of
the Monte Carlo approach.
For the Monte Carlo technique, a large number of simulations
are needed to obtain a statistically firm data. Due to the
complex nature of some statement of the simulation’s process,
the original profiles measured in Gartow could not be
sufficient large in number to ensure statistically the results.
For this purpose, synthetic wind profiles of each class c can be
artificially generated using the statistical information
contained in mean vector cUµ and covariance matrix
cU
COV over the height [1], [3]. For each generated wind
speed profile, a value of uσ is assigned depending on its mean
wind speed value at 156z = m. Finally, the response of the
chimney has been separately calculated.
Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Structural Dynamics, EURODYN 2014
1401
3.3 Dynamic calculation in frequency domain
The response of the chimney under gusty wind has been
calculated using the considerations of the stochastic vibrations
theory. Early studies made by Davenport [6] show the
difficulty to obtain in a deterministic way the response of the
structure, reducing the response’s information to statistical
parameters in terms of mean values, standard deviations and
spectral density functions. If a linear system is considered, the
maximal response of a structure X can be divided into a
static mean part X , provoked by the mean wind speed, and a
superimposed dynamic part x Xσ obtained from the wind
fluctuations and statistically firm with the well-known peak
factor xg [10]:
ˆ xxX X g
X= + ⋅
σ (5)
The method of resolution for a SDOF system under stochastic
stationary wind loading has been implemented in the finite
element method.
Figure 5. MDOF system considered in the calculation (a) and
node-element interaction (b) [9]
The resolution of a MDOF is carried out extending the
formulation to a matrix based representation after [7] and [8].
The multi degree of freedom system MDOF is shown in
Figure 5. The stationary wind force acting on the whole
structure is transformed into a finite number of stochastic
forces acting at the different nodes as depicts Figure 5a.
Nodes and elements are shown in Figure 5b. The mean wind
force applied on the node i basically depends on the
corresponding mean wind speed iU provided by the synthetic
profile ( )cU z :
( )2 1
2 2i i
j j
iwind D
L LF U D C
++= ⋅ ⋅ ⋅ ⋅
ρ (6)
The height-dependent drag coefficient iDC is obtained using
the formula given in EN 1991-1-4 for circular cylinders with a
diameter D and equivalent roughness of 0.5 mm. For the
calculation of the fluctuating dynamic part, is necessary the
definition of a correlated cross-spectral density matrix
( )fffS . It is obtained from the diagonal matrix ( )ff fS ,
which contains the 11 power spectral density functions of the
wind forces ( )iffS f :
2
2
2( ) 4 ( ) ( )
i
iff uu i
i
FS f S f f
U= ⋅ ⋅ ⋅ χ (7)
The power spectral density function of the wind turbulence
( )uuS f depends on the assigned standard deviation of the
wind turbulence uσ to the synthetic wind profile. The same
expression as in EN 1991-1-4 has been used:
2 5/3
( ) 6.8 ( )
(1 10.2 ( ))
uu L
u L
f S f f f
f f
⋅ ⋅=
+ ⋅σ (8)
The nondimensional frequency Lf can be approximated by
L uf f T= ⋅ if the Taylor-Hypothesis is assumed. From the
integral length scale given in the EN 1991-1-4 for a terrain
category II, an integral time scale of 6.8uT = has been
selected. The coherence function ( )ij fγ proposed by
Davenport [10] is used to expand the diagonal matrix ( )ff fS
to a fully correlated cross-spectral density matrix. The
aerodynamic admittance function 2 ( )fχ is used as in the
formulation presented in the Eurocode 1 considering fully
correlation in along-wind direction:
2( ) ( ) ( )
i ii y zf R f R f= ⋅χ (9)
where:
( )2
2
1 1( ) 1
2
y
y
y y
R f e− ⋅
= − −⋅
η
η η (10)
( )2
2
1 1( ) 1
2
zz
z z
R f e− ⋅= − −
⋅
η
η η (11)
The frequency-dependent coefficients yη and zη depends on
the dimensions of the corresponding body surface, the decay
coefficients 11.5z yC C= = [11], the mean wind speed acting
on the node iU and the factors Ky and Kz.
( )y y j
y
i
K C Bf f
U
⋅ ⋅= ⋅η (12)
1
2( )
j j
z z
z
i
L LK C
f fU
++ ⋅ ⋅
= ⋅η (13)
These two factors are studied in detail by Solari [12]. They are
influenced by the mean wind speed profile acting on the
structure and its mode shape. A constant value of
0.4z yK K= = is chosen. The spectral matrix of the
displacements ( )fxxS can be calculated using the following
expression [8]:
* T( ) ( ) ( ) ( )f f f f= ⋅ ⋅xx ffS H S H (14)
Finally, the standard deviation of the response xσ is obtained
after integration of the response spectrum:
x xxS dfσ = ⋅∫ (15)
Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Structural Dynamics, EURODYN 2014
1402
3.4 Results of the Monte Carlo simulation
For each synthetic wind speed profile, the mean, fluctuating
and maximal response is calculated in terms of bending
moment yM at the foundation of the chimney. The
convergences of two variables have been considered. The
first, the convergence of the maximal response ˆ .yM The
second, the convergence of the fluctuating loading part in
terms of .yMσ With ˆ
yM andyMσ , the convergence of the
static and dynamic parts is statistically firm. About 180.000
total simulations have been carried and the participation of
each wind profile class c has been weighted with the
corresponding wind occurrence frequency .cH
Figure 6. Results provided by the Monte-Carlo simulation
Figure 6 shows the relative occurrence frequency cP of the
standard deviation of bending moment yMσ for each wind
class c. The power law and linear classes are the wind profiles
with highest wind speeds and therefore the largest responses
are obtained. The responses caused by the jet classes are very
small and concentrated on the low response ranges and their
influence is almost negligible. The sinus and constant classes
are located in the low-medium response range. Even though
the linear profile class produces large bending moments at the
base of the chimney, its participation in the global response is
low (H6 = 9%) and its importance is dramatically reduced in
comparison to the power law (H1 = 55.9 %) and constant
classes (H5
= 29.9 %). To consider the expected fatigue
damage of any structure, the low and medium wind situations
are more important due to their high occurrence frequencies.
Therefore, it could be stated that the power law and constant
profiles are the most important profile classes for a fatigue life
analysis.
4 FATIGUE ANALYSIS
The fatigue life of any structure under wind buffeting depends
on the number of load cycles caused by the gusts and on the
sequence in which these external loads are applied. The
stochastic nature of the wind makes this analysis complex and
the spectral characteristics of the incident loads determine the
form and number of load cycles acting on the structure during
its design life. Therefore, for a correct design approach of a
structure under wind fatigue, the knowledge of a realistic load
collective during its predetermined lifetime is necessary.
4.1 Number of loads caused by gusts according to EN
1991-1-4
For the number of load cycles caused by gusts, Eurocode 1
provides a simple approach. EN 1991-1-4 allows the
calculation of the number of time GN that a given value ∆S
of an effect of the wind is reached or exceeded during a total
period of 50 years:
2
( ) 0.7 log ( ) 17.4 log( ) 100G G G
k
SN N N
S
∆= ⋅ − ⋅ + (16)
The given value ∆S is defined by percentage of the maximal
effect kS on the structure due to a 50 years return wind
period. As stated in [13], the unconfined usage of EN 1991-1-
4 seems to be not precise. The mathematical background of
the curve is directly related to the mathematical method
proposed by Davenport [14]. He combined probabilities of
wind climates and response processes from wind tunnel
experiments with the mathematical estimation of the
upcrossing levels made by Rice. The formulation of the
problem is not only vague in the definition itself but also in
the conditions in which the corresponding expression can be
used. Any specifications about the site-dependent wind
parameters and/or structural characteristics are necessary to
use the formula. And of course, it does not take into account
the occurrence of different profile shapes.
4.2 Dirlik’s methodology
In case of an arbitrary stochastic process Dirlik [15] derived a
formula to count the number of cycles and amplitude ranges
based on the power spectra density function of the process:
2 2
21 2 2 232
0
( )2
Z Z Z
Q RD D Z
e e D Z eQ R
pm
− − −
⋅⋅
⋅ + ⋅ + ⋅ ⋅
∆σ = (17)
where:
( )2 21 1
1 22
3 1 2
0
23 2 1
21 1 1
2 1 2
0 40 4
4
02
2 1
11
∆1
2
1.25 ( )
1
( ) [ ]
m
m
m
nn
x D DD D
R
D D D Zm
D D R x DQ R
D D D
m m mx
m mm m
mm f S f df E P
m
∞
⋅ − − − += =
−+
= − − =
⋅ − − ⋅ − −= =
− − +
= = ⋅⋅
= ⋅ ⋅ =∫ σσ
γ γ
γ
σ
γ γ
γ
γ
(18)
Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Structural Dynamics, EURODYN 2014
1403
where nm are the statistical moments, E[P] symbolize the
number of peaks maxima per second or peak rate and γ is
known as the irregularity factor. The probability density
function of the rainflow ranges (∆ )p σ is based on the
weighted sum of Rayleigh, modified Rayleigh and
exponential probability distributions. The frequency of
occurrence of stress ranges '( )N ∆σ in an expected time T can
be determined with the Dirlik’s method in following terms:
[ ]'( ) ( )N E P T p∆σ = ⋅ ⋅ ∆σ (19)
This approach, defined entirely in the frequency domain,
provides an equivalent result than the rainflow counting
methodology defined in the time domain. This empirical
method can be used successfully for stochastic processes with
any band-width ranges. In other works [16] the verification of
the reliability of this spectral method has been carried out with
parallel calculations in time domain. The spectral estimations
matches excellent for gust excited structural responses.
4.3 Influence of the wind profile shape on the fatigue
The aerodynamic damping in equation (3), as well as the
coherence function ( )ij fγ , the aerodynamic admittance
function 2 ( )i fχ , the spectral density function of the wind
forces ( )iffS f and the standard deviation of the wind
turbulence uσ are variables strongly dependent on the mean
wind speed and thus on the shape of the mean wind speed
profile. The results show a high variability of (∆ )p σ between
synthetic profiles [9] and therefore, the Monte Carlo
simulation is again necessary.
Figure 7 shows the results using Dirlik’s method. The values
of the mean irregularity factor γ for each wind class c are
also plotted. This factor is defined between 0 and 1 and it used
to classify the bandwidth of a process. For a later treatment of
the fatigue life prognosis of the chimney, the frequencies of
occurrence of each profile class Hc given in Figure 6 are
considered.
The numerical solution of the Dirlik methodology in the
Monte-Carlo simulation has been considered in terms of a
mixture distribution:
6
realistic
1
(∆ ) (∆ )c
c
c
p H p
=
= ⋅∑σ σ (20)
where (∆ )cp σ are the probability distributions associated to
each profile class c and displayed in Figure 7. The mixture
distribution is represented with the pink dotted line. The
increase of (∆ )p σ for very low values of stress occurs due to
the contribution of the exponential distribution, defined in the
first term of the numerator in equation (17).
4.4 Determination of load collectives using realistic wind
profiles
In other publications, load collectives from gusts are
developed combining separately wind speed distributions and
responses at different load levels [16], [17]. In the presented
work, the wind speed distribution over the height and the
dynamics of the structure are implicit included in the Monte
Carlo simulation.
Figure 7. Results provided by Dirlik’s method in case
different profile classes
The load collective can be calculated integrating the
probability density function as follows:
realistic( ) [ ] ( )
i
i LifeN T E P p d
∞
∆σ
∆σ > ∆σ = ⋅ ⋅ ∆σ ⋅ ∆σ∫ (21)
where TLife is the designing lifetime in seconds. The main
problematic observed with equation (21) is the correct
coverage of the extreme values if a design proposal for a time
period of 50 years will be carried out. The parent Gaussian
distribution of the mean wind speed used for the definition of
realistic (∆ )p σ shows an excellent behavior in the description of
the low-and moderate wind conditions. But the distribution of
the extreme values is not well covered, because extreme
responses are always studied with other distributions, as the
Fisher –Tipett . Peil et al. [19] noted that for probabilities of
occurrence lower than 0.01, the Weibull distribution is not an
effective tool to represent extreme winds and the application
of equation (21) at theses ranges is highly questionable.
If a load collective for a return period of 50 years is
calculated, it is assumed that the maximal response
maxY occurs only once. This reference value is associated to
the peak response of the structure for a wind with 50 years
return period and it can be calculated applying equation (5).
A reason which contributes to the possible overestimation of
the real maximal response max∆σ can be primarily related
with the definition of the peak factor xg itself [6]. Davenport
considered that response of the structure to a Gaussian
stationary wind action can be described as a narrow-band
process. On the contrary, the MDOF system used in the
current work incurs in stochastic responses which diverge
from the ideal narrow-band case. To avoid the overestimation
in the response produced by a narrow-band assumption,
Cartwright and Longuet-Higgins [20] proposed a new
definition of peak factor xg with consideration of the
bandwidth:
Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Structural Dynamics, EURODYN 2014
1404
0.5772
2 ln( )2 ln( )
LHg TT
= ⋅ ⋅ ⋅ +⋅ ⋅ ⋅
γ υγ υ
(22)
Figure 8 shows the load collective of the 150 m high steel
chimney with fundamental frequency 0 0.123f = Hz and
structural damping of 0.02=Λ determined with the Dirlik
method for a time period of 50 years. The continuous blue line
represents the results obtained from the Monte-Carlo
simulation. There were obtained after calculation of the
response of the chimney for more than 100.000 synthetic wind
profiles. Due to the impossibility to cover the extreme values,
the curve should be extended up to the left part of the figure.
Therefore, two hypothetical dotted lines have been plotted
additionally, unifying the medium load range with the extreme
amplitudes. The maximal stress amplitude max∆σ has been
computed for a 50 years return period wind associated to a
terrain category II and basic wind speed 25 m/s and applying
the two peak factor expressions.
The results obtained from the Monte-Carlo simulation shows
lower amplitude levels for a same number of occurrences GN
than the proposal of Kemper [16]. Kemper developed his
method in a conservative way and does not take into account
the effects of the aerodynamic damping aeroD and
aerodynamic admittance function 2 ( )fχ . The chimney is 150
meters high and the absence of aeroD and 2 ( )fχ yields to a
large overestimation of the dynamic response.
Figure 8. Load collective within 50 years
4.5 Calculation of damage accumulation
The total damage is calculated using the Palmgren-Miner
hypothesis. The principle of operation of this methodology is
discretizing different load levels in separated damage cells
and adding linearly their influence on the structure over the
entire lifetime of the structure:
i
i
nD
N=∑ (23)
One advantage of working with probability density functions
is the possibility of the direct analytically calculation of the
fatigue damage. If the reduction of the fatigue strength ∆ Dσ
to its threshold ∆ Lσ is considered, a tri-linear Wöhler’s curve
of fatigue damage can be applied to the determination
of (∆ )iN σ . In case of engineering solutions, the probability
density function is discretized into a finite number m of stress
ranges of width∆ wσ . For the comparative study of the
expected damage between the current work and EN 1991-1-4,
a total 10 different stress levels have been selected for the
application of equation (23). Another four Monte-Carlo
simulations have been carried to calibrate the sensitivity of the
expected damage on the structural damping Λ .
Table 1 shows the reduction factor DR of the damage in case
of different structural damping ratios Λ for the chimney
depicts in Figure 4. The damage has been entirely calculated
at the chimney foundation supposing a fatigue detail category
of ∆ 71C =σ N/mm2 for a period of 50 years. This factor is
defined as follows:
EN 1991-1-4D
DR
D= (24)
The expected damage calculated using the above presented
method is considerable lower than the expected material
damage obtained if the Eurocode 1 is applied. The results
show that the factor DR increases if the structural damping
Λ also increases. This performance has been also observed
for other fatigue detail categories.
Table 1. Reduction factor RD of the expected damage.
Structural damping Λ [-]
0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05
DR 49.5 52.3 54.5 56.4 59.4
There are several reasons to explain the large differences in
the fatigue prognosis between the Eurocode proposal and the
present work. For the application of EN 1991-1-4, no more
information than the maximal stress amplitude max∆σ is
necessary. However, the current work has combined in a
MDOF system the influence of the site dependent
characteristics, the inclusion of different mean wind speed
profile classes, the aerodynamic damping, aerodynamic
admittance function and the Dirlik method. The combination
of all these factors yields to a large reduction of the expected
damage due to the precision inserted along the entire process
of calculation.
5 CONCLUSIONS
The response of slender industrial chimneys under wind
buffeting have been simulated in order to compare the fatigue
life prognosis according Eurocode 1 and the wind statistics
defined by Clobes et al. from the site Gartow [2]. A Monte
Carlo simulation has been used to provide statistically firm
data. Large number of synthetic wind profiles has been
generated starting from the mean vector Uµ and the
covariance matrixU
COV separately defined for each profile
class c. From the data obtained in Gartow, a classification of
the standard deviation of the wind turbulence uσ is made.
Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Structural Dynamics, EURODYN 2014
1405
This last variable is fundamental in the buffeting loading
process and therefore, a unique realistic value of uσ can be
separately assigned for each synthetic wind speed profile
depending on its profile class c and mean wind speed value.
The dynamic response of a 150 m high steel chimney has been
simulated applying the stochastic vibration theory on a multi
degree of freedom system. The model has been generated as
real as possible including the influence of the aerodynamic
damping, as well as the inclusion of several wind profile
shape-dependent variables, as the aerodynamic damping etc.
The results of the Monte Carlo simulation show a clear
differentiation between the profile classes c on the response of
the chimney. Power law class and linear class produce the
largest response but the effect of the latter is diluted in the
overall response due to its low occurrence frequency.
In order to study the expected fatigue damage of the structure,
the Dirlik method has been applied to calculate the probability
distribution of the stress amplitudes (∆ )p σ using the spectral
information of the bending moment at the foundation of the
chimney. This easy method is characterized by its precision
being a combination of different probability distributions. The
resulting probability distribution of the stress amplitudes has
been defined in terms of a mixture distribution considering the
occurrence frequency of each wind profile class c. With the
integration of this formula, is a load collective of the structure
for a lifetime of 50 years is obtained. This collective has been
implemented with the Palgren-Miner method to calculate the
expected damage of the chimney and the results have been
compared with those if the load collective given in Eurocode
is applied. The approach given in the standard shows an
overestimation of the damage in comparison with the actual
study. Therefore, the unique application of the approach of the
Eurocode 1 for each structure without consideration of
damping, site-dependent wind statistics and natural
frequencies of the structure can yield to a large overestimation
in the expected damage.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The funding of the Basque Government and the CICIND are
gratefully acknowledged.
REFERENCES
[1] Clobes, M., Willecke, A., Peil, U. Vortex-induced vibrations of slender
structures considering long-term wind profile statistics. 8th International
Conference on Structural Dynamics EURODYN, 2011.
[2] Clobes, M., Willecke, A., Peil, U. Shape-dependent characteristics of
full-scale wind profiles. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial
Aerodynamics, Vol. 99, p. 919-30, 2011.
[3] Willecke, A. Simulation der Wirbelerregung unter Berücksichtigung
realistischer Windprofile. Dissertation, Technische Universität
Braunschweig, Germany, Shaker Verlag, Aachen, 2013.
[4] EN 1991-1-4. Eurocode 1: Actions on structures – Part 1-4: General
Actions – Wind Actions, CEN, Brussels, 2005.
[5] Dyrbye, C. and Hansen, S.O.: Wind Loads on Structures. John Wiley &
Sons, 1997.
[6] Davenport A.G.: The application of statistical concepts to the wind
loading of structures. Institution of Civil Engineers Proceedings, Vol.
19, Paper Number 6480, p. 449-471, 1961.
[7] Peil, U.: Stahlbau Handbuch, Vol. 1, Part A., Chapter 7 Baudynamik.
Köln, 1993.
[8] Clough, R. W. and Penzien, J.: Dynamics of structures. McGraw-Hill
Inc., 1993.
[9] Aizpurua Aldasoro H., Clobes M. and Thiele, K.: Fatigue prognosis for
industrial chimneys considering long-term wind profile statistics.
CICIND Final Report. Institute of steel structures, TU Braunschweig,
2013.
[10] Davenport A.G.: Gust Loading Factors. Journal of the Structural
Division ASCE, Vol. 93, p. 11-34, 1967.
[11] Solari, G.: Gust Buffeting II: Dynamic Alongwind Response. Journal of
Structural Engineering, Vol. 119, p. 383-398, 1993.
[12] Solari, G.: Dynamic Alongwind Response of Structures by Equivalent
Wind Spectrum Technique. Istituto di Scienza delle Construzioni.
University of Genoa, Italy, 1988.
[13] Kemper, F., Feldmann, M. Fatigue life prognosis for structural
elements under stochastic wind loading based on spectral methods, Part
I: Linear structures. 8th International Conference on Structural
Dynamics EURODYN, 2011.
[14] Davenport, A. G.: The Estimation of load repetitions on structures with
application to wind induced fatigue and overload. London, Ontario,
University of Western Ontario, 1966.
[15] Dirlik, T.: Application of computers in fatigue analysis. Phd Thesis.
Warwick University, Coventry. England, 1985.
[16] Kemper, F.: Böeninduzierte Schwingungsanfälligkeit von durchlässigen
Fassadenelementen unter Berücksichtigung nichtlinearer
Struktureigenschaften im Grenzzustand der Ermüdung. PhD Thesis.
RWTH Aachen, 2013.
[17] Peil, U. and Behrens, M.: Ermüdung von Beleuchtungs- und
Signalmasten durch den böigen Wind. DASt Forschungsbericht Nr.
6330, 2000.
[18] Rice, O. S.: Mathematical analysis of random noise, Pt. III. Bell System
Technical Journal, Vol. 19, p. 46 – 156, 1945.
[19] Peil, U. and Nölle, H.: Ermittlung der Lebensdauer hoher
windbeanspruchter Bauwerke. Bauingenieur Vol.70, p. 21-33, 1995 (in
German).
[20] Cartwright, D. E. and Longuet-Higgins, M. S.: The statistical
distribution of the maxima of a random function. Proceedings of the
Royal Society of London 237, Nr. 1209, p. 212-232, 1956.
Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Structural Dynamics, EURODYN 2014
1406