Exploring the State of Facilities 2014 [Part 2]: Space, Density, & Age
-
Upload
sightlines -
Category
Education
-
view
82 -
download
1
Transcript of Exploring the State of Facilities 2014 [Part 2]: Space, Density, & Age
![Page 1: Exploring the State of Facilities 2014 [Part 2]: Space, Density, & Age](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022052907/5592c4521a28abd10f8b46d3/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Space, Density & Age
![Page 2: Exploring the State of Facilities 2014 [Part 2]: Space, Density, & Age](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022052907/5592c4521a28abd10f8b46d3/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Campus Space and EnrollmentNational average for enrollment and space growth
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
% C
hang
e of
Enr
ollm
ent &
Spa
ce
Space & Enrollment GrowthNational Average
National Space Growth National Enrollment Growth
![Page 3: Exploring the State of Facilities 2014 [Part 2]: Space, Density, & Age](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022052907/5592c4521a28abd10f8b46d3/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Campus Space and EnrollmentBy institution type
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
14%
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
% C
hang
e of
Enr
ollm
ent a
nd S
pace
Space & Enrollment GrowthBy institution type
Space Growth Enrollment Growth
Comprehensive Research Small
![Page 4: Exploring the State of Facilities 2014 [Part 2]: Space, Density, & Age](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022052907/5592c4521a28abd10f8b46d3/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Campus Space and EnrollmentPublic vs. Private Institutions
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
14%
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
Perc
ent C
hang
e of
Enr
ollm
ent &
Spa
ce
Campus EnrollmentBy Public vs. Private
Space Growth Enrollment Growth
Public Private
![Page 5: Exploring the State of Facilities 2014 [Part 2]: Space, Density, & Age](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022052907/5592c4521a28abd10f8b46d3/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
The Aging CampusNational Trending vs. Public and Private
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
% o
f Spa
ce
Square Footage by Age Category (Renovation Age)Public vs. Private
Under 10 10 to 25 25 to 50 Over 50
National Average Public Average Private Average
![Page 6: Exploring the State of Facilities 2014 [Part 2]: Space, Density, & Age](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022052907/5592c4521a28abd10f8b46d3/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
0.0%
2.0%
4.0%
6.0%
8.0%
10.0%
12.0%
% o
f Tot
al G
SF C
onst
ruct
ed
Constructed Space Since 1880
Waves of Construction Hitting Major Life CyclesPercent of total database GSF
Pre-War Post-War Modern Complex
*FY15 includes projections of new space online FY14-15
40% 27%
Pre-
War Built before 1951
Durable constructionOlder but typically lasts longer Po
st-W
ar
Built between 1951 and 1975Lower-quality constructionAlready needing more repairs and renovations M
oder
n Built between 1975 and 1990Quick-flash constructionLow-quality building components
Com
plex
Built in 1991 and newerTechnically complex spacesHigher-quality, more expensive to maintain & repair
![Page 7: Exploring the State of Facilities 2014 [Part 2]: Space, Density, & Age](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022052907/5592c4521a28abd10f8b46d3/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
70.0%
80.0%
90.0%
100.0%
Constructed New Space
Academic Non-Academic
Academic vs. Non-Academic
Historic Look at Constructed Space on Campus
*FY15 includes projections of new space online FY14-15
![Page 8: Exploring the State of Facilities 2014 [Part 2]: Space, Density, & Age](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022052907/5592c4521a28abd10f8b46d3/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
“Ask Sightlines”Response
![Page 9: Exploring the State of Facilities 2014 [Part 2]: Space, Density, & Age](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022052907/5592c4521a28abd10f8b46d3/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
At Risk Age Profiles TrendNational Trending vs. Public and Private
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
% o
f Spa
ce
Square Footage by Age Category (Renovation Age)Public vs. Private
Under 10 10 to 25 25 to 50 Over 50
National Average Public Average Private Average
![Page 10: Exploring the State of Facilities 2014 [Part 2]: Space, Density, & Age](https://reader033.fdocuments.in/reader033/viewer/2022052907/5592c4521a28abd10f8b46d3/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
10
Institutions Can Get YoungerState system reverses the trend
Peers System A