Web 2.0 in the ClassroomThe Impact New Technology is Having on

Multiliteracies Practices

Suzanne MastersEducation 6390, Summer 2011

Introduction

Multiliteracie

s

Web 2.0

What does it mean to be Multi-Literate?

1, 2

What does it mean to be Multi-Literate?

3, 4

What does it mean to be Multi-Literate?

5, 6

Student Identity

7,3,8

Student Identity

9,4

Student Identity

10,2

How Multiple Literacies Change the Learning Environment

How Multiple Literacies Change the Learning Environment

11,12

How Multiple Literacies Change the Learning Environment

13, 2, 8

How Multiple Literacies Change the Learning Environment

9, 14

How Multiple Literacies Change the Learning Environment

5, 15, 16, 17

Student Achievement and Engagement in a Web 2.0 Classroom

19

Student Achievement and Engagement in a Web 2.0 Classroom

20,21,22,10

Student Achievement and Engagement in a Web 2.0 Classroom

23,24,25,22

Is it Just Hype?

26

Is it Just Hype?

Web 1.0

Web 2.0

Web 3.0

15,27

Is it Just Hype?

28,17,29,16

Is it Just Hype?

30,31

Is it Just Hype?

32,33

Is it Just Hype?

34,35

Is it Just Hype?

36,32,28

Conclusion

8,11

Conclusion

Conclusion

24,28

Conclusion

31

Conclusion

Multiliteracie

s

Web 2.0

References1. Graham, M.S. & Benson, S. (2010). A springboard rather than a bridge: diving into multimodal literacy.

English Journal, 100(2), 93-97.2. Vasudevan, L. (2010). Literacies in a participatory, multimodal world: the arts and aesthetics of web 2.0.

Language Arts, 88(1), 43-50. 3. Gallagher, K. & Ntelioglou, B.Y. (2011). Which new literacies? Dialogue and performance in youth writing.

Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 54(5), 322-330. 4. Luo, L. (2009). Web 2.0 integration in information literacy instruction: An overview. The Journal of

Academic Librarianship, 36(1), 32-40.5. Rollett, H., Lux, M., Strohmaier, M., Dosinger, G., & Tochtermann, K. (2007). The web 2.0 way of learning

with technologies. International Journal of Learning Technology, 3(1), 87-107.6. Smythe, S. & Neufeld, P. (2010). Podcast time: Negotiating digital literacies and communities of learning in

a middle years ell classroom. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 53(6), 488-496.7. Gounari, P. (2009). Rethinking critical literacy in the new information age. Critical Inquiry in Language

Studies, 6(3), 148-175.8. Jewett, P. (2011). Multiple literacies gone wild. The Reading Teacher, 64(5), 341-344.9. Silvers, P., Shorey, M., & Crafton, L. (2010). Critical literacy in a primary multiliteracies classroom: The

hurricane group. Journal of Early Childhood literacy, 10(4), 379-409.10. Attwell, G. (n.d.). Web 2.0 and the changing ways we are using computers for learning: What are the

implications for pedagogy and curriculum. Retrieved June 14, 2011 from http://scholar.google.ca/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0,5&q=web+2.0+and+the+changing+ways+we+are+using+computers+for+learning

11. Haydey, D.C., Magro, K., & Nahachewsky, J. (2007). Multiliteracies: Three studies of classroom practice. English Quarterly Canada, 39(3), 40-56.

12. Collis, B. & Moonen, J. (2008). Web 2.0 tools and processes in higher education: quality perspectives. Educational Media International, 45(2), 93-106.

13. McLoughlin, C. & Lee, M.J.W. (2007). Social software and participatory learning: Pedagogical choices with technology affordances in the Web 2.0 era. In ICT: Providing choices for learners and learning. Proceedings ascilite Singapore 2007. http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/singapore07/procs/mcloughlin.pdf

14. Magolda, P.M. & Platt, G.J. (2009). Untangling web 2.0`s influences on student learning. About Campus, 14(3), 10-16.

References15. Granitz, N. & Koernig, S.K. (2011). Web 2.0 and marketing education: explanations and experiential

applications. Journal of Marketing Education, 33(1), 57-72.16. Clark, W., Logan, K., Luckin, R., Mee, A., & Oliver, M. (2009). Beyond web 2.0: mapping the technology

landscapes of young learners. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 25, 56-69.17. Merchant, G. (2009). Web 2.0, new literacies, and the idea of learning through participation. English Teaching:

Practice and Critique, 8(3), 107-122.18. Chou, P.N. & Chen, H.H. (2008). Engagement in online collaborative learning: A case study using a web 2.0

tool. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 4(4), 574-582. 19. Shapely, K.S., Sheehan, D., & Maloney, C. (2010). Evaluating the implementation fidelity of technology

immersion and its relationship with student achievement. Journal of Technology, Learning & Assessment, 9(4), 1-68.

20. Dockter, J., Haug, D., & Lewis, C. (2010). Redefining rigor: critical engagement, digital media, and the new English/language arts. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 53(5), 418-420.

21. Conley, M., Freidhoff, J., Sherry, M., & Forbes Tuckey, S. (2008). Book Review of Meeting the challenges of adolescent literacy: Research we have, research we need. Canadian Journal of Education, 34(1), 338-340.

22. Vaughan, N. (2010). Student engagement and web 2.0: what’s the connection?. Education Canada, 2, 52-55.23. Hammett, R.F. (2007). Assessment and new literacies. E-Learning, 4(3), 343-354.24. Williams, P.J. (2009). Technological literacy: a multiliteracies approach for democracy. International Journal of

Technology and Design Education, 19(3), 237-254.25. Williams, J. & Chinn, S.J. (2009). Using web 2.0 to support the active learning experience. Journal of

Information Systems Education, 20(2), 165-174.26. Fahser-Herro, D. & Steinkuehler, C. (2009). Web 2.0 literacy and secondary teacher education. Journal of

Computing in Teacher Education, 26(2), 55-73. 27. Alexander, B. (2008). Web 2.0 and emergent multiliteracies. Theory Into Practice, 47, 150-160.28. Godwin, P. (2009). Information literacy and Web 2.0: is it just hype?. Electronic Library and Information

Systems, 43(3), 264-274. 29. Grabill, J.T. & Hicks, T. (2005). Multiliteracies meet methods: The case for digital writing in English education.

English Education, 37(4), 301-311.30. Nahachewsky, J. (2007). At the edge of reason: teaching language and literacy in a digital age. E-Learning,

4(3), 355-366.

References31. Ladbrook, J. & Probert, E. (2011). Information skills and critical literacy: Where are our digikids at

with online searching and are their teachers helping?. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 27(1), 105-121.

32. Light, D. (2011). Do web 2.0 right. Learning and Leading with Technology, 38, 11-15.33. Wheeler, S., Yeomans, P., & Wheeler, D. (2008). The good, the bad and the wiki: Evaluating

student-generated content for collaborative learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(6), 987-995.

34. Handsfield, L.J., Dean, T.R., & Cielocha, K.M. (2009). Becoming critical consumers and producers of text: Teaching literacy with web 1.0 and web 2.0. The Reading Teacher, 63(1), 40-50.

35. Glassman, M. & Kang, M.J. (2011). The logic of wikis: The possibilities of the web 2.0 classroom. Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 6, 93-112.

36. Lankshear, C. & Knobel, M. (2007). Researching new literacies: web 2.0 practices and insider perspectives. E-Learning, 4(3), 224-240.

For further information please visit my website: https://sites.google.com/site/education6390/