Example questions from doctoral defense of Mikko Vesisenaho

16
Doctoral Defense of Mikko Vesisenaho Seugnet Blignaut (Professor) North-West University Potchestroom, South Africa

description

Questions posed by Prof. Seugnet Blignaut (North-West University) during the public examination of Mikko Vesisenaho's doctoral dissertation.

Transcript of Example questions from doctoral defense of Mikko Vesisenaho

Page 1: Example questions from doctoral defense of Mikko Vesisenaho

Doctoral Defense of Mikko Vesisenaho

Seugnet Blignaut (Professor)North-West University

Potchestroom, South Africa

Page 2: Example questions from doctoral defense of Mikko Vesisenaho

Research Design

• In one sentence, what is your research really about?

• What did you discover through your research that we do not already know from the existing knowledge base on your topic?

Page 3: Example questions from doctoral defense of Mikko Vesisenaho

Ethnographical Stance

• What are the epistemological commitments that underpin your research strategy and approach?

• How did these epistemological commitments guide and influence your research?

Page 4: Example questions from doctoral defense of Mikko Vesisenaho

Research Design & Methodology

• Explain the research design of your thesis

• What is Development Research? Why DR?

• How does it differ from Action Research?

• Why did you not use AR?

• In retrospect, how would your change your research design to place more emphasis on the research and less on the design?

Page 5: Example questions from doctoral defense of Mikko Vesisenaho

Research Methodology

• Did you make use of mixed methodology research, or did you pragmatically employ both qualitative and quantitative approaches to best capture data?

• What did you do marry these two contradicting research approaches?

• How do you define your position as a researcher in a “mainly qualitative study”?

Page 6: Example questions from doctoral defense of Mikko Vesisenaho

Theoretical Framework

• Has the CATI-model been an external framework, or is it an actual result of this research?

• How does it relate to other developmental frameworks?

• How did your case study interact with the CATI-model?

Page 7: Example questions from doctoral defense of Mikko Vesisenaho

Theoretical Constructs

• What were your reasons for selecting constructivist learning as part of your theoretical framework?

• Your research participants came from an authoritarian society. What did you do to foster constructivist learning principles?

• In retrospect, would you have considered other underpinning philosophies for teaching and learning computer science education content?

Page 8: Example questions from doctoral defense of Mikko Vesisenaho

Theoretical Constructs

Sustainable development: “… development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs …”

• In retrospect, how would you build onto this definition?

• What are your expectations for sustainable development through your project in Tanzania?

Page 9: Example questions from doctoral defense of Mikko Vesisenaho

Theoretical Constructs

• Provide a clear picture of the context in which this case study took place.

• What were the outcomes of you needs assessment in terms of contextualization?

• How did the context influence the selection of computer science course assignments?

• How did you evaluate the assignments in terms of specific contexts and a constructivist learning approach?

Page 10: Example questions from doctoral defense of Mikko Vesisenaho

Theoretical Constructs

“Metaphorical concepts are those which are understood and structured not merely on their own terms, but rather in terms of other concepts. This involves conceptualizing one kind of object or experience in terms of a different kind of object or experience … Abstract concepts are defined metaphorically in terms of concepts that are more concrete and more clearly structured on their own terms.” (Lakoff & Johnson, 1980, p.195)

Page 11: Example questions from doctoral defense of Mikko Vesisenaho

Theoretical Concepts

Metaphors:

• Why did you choose a traditional African village as an “instructional interface metaphor” to carry the learning of abstract concepts such as programming language via foreign objects such as i-blocks?

• How did you go about contextualizing the local learning content through the i-blocks?

Page 12: Example questions from doctoral defense of Mikko Vesisenaho

Research Findings

• What is the single most important theoretical or methodological invention in your research design?

• Did this finding surprise you?

• Did we not know this before?

• How is this finding going to influence your future research?

Page 13: Example questions from doctoral defense of Mikko Vesisenaho

Research Findings

• How in this research have you gone about protecting yourself from finding what you expected? That is, what specific strategies are built into your research design to yield the possibility that you might be wrong?

Page 14: Example questions from doctoral defense of Mikko Vesisenaho

Transferability of Research

• What are the main achievements of your research?

• What has your thesis contributed to the knowledge in the field of I4D?

• How can the outcomes of this research be transferred to other developing learning contexts?

Page 15: Example questions from doctoral defense of Mikko Vesisenaho

Value of Your Research

• Explain and position the value and contribution of your research in terms of the global tensions between the constructs of developing socio-economic inclusionversus e-globalization

Page 16: Example questions from doctoral defense of Mikko Vesisenaho

Value of Your Research

• Does your research speak only to information technology sciences, or also to other paradigms such as software engineering, information systems, educational technology or instructional design?

• Do you see this as a challenge or as an opportunity?