EULER End-User requirements collection - Oulu · EULER Scenario TSUNAMI EVENT TIMELINE: t0 =...
Transcript of EULER End-User requirements collection - Oulu · EULER Scenario TSUNAMI EVENT TIMELINE: t0 =...
www.euler-project.eu
European SDR for wireless in joint security operations
EULER End-Userrequirements collection
Dimitrios Symeonidis - JRC
BRUSSELS, 26TH NOVEMBER 2009
Who are our End Users?
2
Nation Committee member national P&GS agencies (end-users) Partner ensuring liaisonES Spanish MoI – Telecom Area / Emergency Radio System (SIRDEE)INDRAFR French MoI – Group of Police Cooperation EADSFR ENSOSP (Ecole Nationale des Officiers de Sapeurs-Pompiers) THALESFR French MoD – CELAR (Centre Electronique de l'Armement) THALESIT Protezione Civile Nazionale SELEXIT Fondazione Ugo Bordoni ELSAG-DATAMAT
SE SAABUK NPIA (National Policing Improvement Agency) Operational EADS AstriumUK NPIA (National Policing Improvement Agency) Technical EADS AstriumNL Royal Marechaussee (Gendarmerie) TNONL Brandweer (Firebrigade) TNO
MSB (Swedish Civil Contingencies Agency)
MilitaryCivil ProtectionFire & RescueLaw Enforcement Legend :
+ National and European expert groups (PSCE, SECRICOM, ETSI RRS, SDR FORUM, EDA PTSDR)
How do we ask the End Users?
• We need a uniform, systematic and non-nation-specific methodology/framework for user requirements collection
• The questions need a context, a cross-border security relevant situation
• Iterative two-way interaction with end users (at National and European level)
• Harmonisation after each round, feedback 3
What do we ask the End Users?
• We are not starting from scratch• We consolidate past project requirements• Ask them to prioritise the harmonised past
project/event requirements• Add any omitted requirements• Validate the correspondence of collected
requirements to EULER system specifications
4
Matching features and specs
5
Features
ApplicationsServices
Performanceetc...
Technology
SDRWiMAXTETRA
etc...
End Users Industrials
WP2
First Hours of international, state and local Public Safety Operations in response on Tsunami
EULER Scenario
TSUNAMI EVENT TIMELINE: t0 = heartquake
t0ts
until local and mobile command centersare activated and connected to country’sEmergency Control Centers (ECC)
ts = first wave strike
Warning time First hours operations :
On December 2004 in Indonesia there was only 15-20 minutes warning time from the earthquake and the wave strike.
6
FIRST HOURS OPERATION CAPABILITIES
Emergency ControlCentres (ECC)
Air-to-shipAir-to-ground
Air-to-airGround-to-ground:
voice, video and data
Mobile command
centres(MCC)
Airborne video of the area
First links establishment:
V-UHF radio communications
Ship-to-shore communications
Ship-to ship information flow based on navy’s
capabilities
information flow based on fielded wireless network
Public Safety
Answering Point
(PSAP)
Mobile rescue
Mobile rescue
7
FIRST HOURS OPERATION CAPABILITIES
(EOC)Headquarter base for the joint forces
Satellite-based network operated by the
governor’s office of emergency management
8
ORGANIZATIONS NETWORK COMPOSITION
Information flow
Search and Rescue: first operators
Situation awareness: video supported
Link re-establishment
Alerting
Emergency Medical Services/Red Cross
Fire department for locations of fires and search and rescue
Police
Military personnel
Volunteers
Reporting
Managed by Responder Authority
ORGANIZATIONS/ACTORS NAME
EOC
Joint Operations CmdCtrl
9
PSAP
ECCf
”112 net”
ECCp
ECCm
police
fire
medical
MCCf
MCCp
MCCm
crisis area
foreign
military
PSAP= Public Safety Answering PointECC=Emergency Control CentreMCC=Mobile command centre
field agents
ORGANIZATIONS NETWORK: ESTABLISHED COMMS LINK
associate the Euler actor names with the national structures / organization names
who reports to whom?
Comm links requirements?
Communication flows priority ?
PSAPPSAP
ECCpECCf
neighborregions
ECCpECCp
ECCpECCm
police
fire
medical
crisisregion
10
What have the End Users said?
• We have collected answers from 6/11 End-Users: SIRDEE (ES), MSB (SE), NPIA x2 (UK), KMAR (NL), BRANDWEER (NL)
• 5P, 3F, 2M, 1E• 5 TETRA, 5 GSM+, 2 LEGACY FM, 2
BLUETOOTH, 1 WIFI, 1 SATCOM• 5/6 interoperate with PFEM, 2 Civil
Protection, 4 Volunteers11
What have the End Users said?
• All have been involved in major crisis• 5/6 share their network with other orgs• 4/6 had (partially) collapsed network• Classifying applications: no surprises.
Voice & Group calls much more important than others. SMS, DB access & email connected
12
Expected End-User needs (1)
• All worried about limited rf coverage and traffic capacity, 50% worried about QoS, interference immunity
• Reliability/Availability/Robustness: 83%• Authentication/Access Control/
Confidentiality/Integrity: 76%• Power efficiency: 89%
13
Expected End-User needs (2)
• Most important applications: Speech, QoS, Preemptions & Priorities, DB access
• Least important: Bulk file transfer, VideoConf, IM
• Easy and fast deployment, Coexistence w/ existing systems, Interoperability, Mobility
• Reliability, availability, sustainability14
15
Questions?
Open Discussion
• What is your feeling about the EULER approach?
• Does it match your expectations?• Do you see your organisation involved in
this scenario?
16
Open Discussion
• What is your feeling about the preliminary results?
• Could you add more details about your specific needs/application field?
• What is missing from these preliminary results?
17
Open Discussion
• How could we enhance our questionnaire?• How could we enhance our scenario?• Which journals/reviews/magazines do
you read? How could we enhance the dissemination of EULER results in the technical press you consider most important?
• What other events (conferences, workshops, etc) do you organise/attend?18
Open Discussion
• What about interactions between end-users?
• What does it mean for your organisation? • What problems have you had/ expect to
have?• Technical / Organisational / Operational
issues...
19