Essential Elements of a Managed Fall Protection Program
description
Transcript of Essential Elements of a Managed Fall Protection Program
ESSENTIAL ELEMENTS OF A MANAGED FALL PROTECTION
PROGRAM
TRACEY RIEPENHOFF, P.E., C.S.P., P.M.P. - [email protected]; Phone: (419) 225-5995
MARCH 2012
2
INTRODUCTION
Tracey Riepenhoff, P.E., C.S.P., P.M.P.> Principal in LJB Safety division
> 20 years experience in fall protection industry
> Past member: ANSI Z359 Committee
> ASSE Top 100 Women in Safety
> Frequent speaker at regional and national
conferences
3
BOTTOM LINE UPFRONT
The difference between an effective and an ineffective program
can be the difference between life and death.
4
LEARNING OBJECTIVES
Discuss the core elements of a fall protection program
Apply the Hierarchy of Control when evaluating and controlling
fall hazards
List common uses and limitations of PPE
Identify action steps to improve an existing fall protection
program
5
CALL TO ACTION
1. Evaluate your current practice for fall hazard identification
• Existing hazards
• Future hazards
2. Determine how abatement solutions are selected
3. Identify who needs competent person training
6
PROGRAM CORE ELEMENTS
Management leadership and employee participation
Hazard identification and evaluation
Hazard abatement
Training
Program evaluation
7
PROGRAM CORE ELEMENTS
Management leadership and employee participation
Hazard identification and evaluation
Hazard abatement
Training
Program evaluation
8
Fall hazard categories> Means of access
> Locations
> Tasks
> Improper use of PPE
WHAT DO YOU LOOK FOR?
9
MEANS OF ACCESS
10
LOCATIONS – ROOF EDGE
11
LOCATIONS – TOP OF TANK
12
TASKS – MEZZANINE GUARDRAILS
13
IMPROPER USE OF PPE
14
15
16
17
HAZARD EVALUATION
Prioritize risk
Probability >What is the chance you are going to fall?
>Frequency
>Likelihood of a fall
Severity
>What will happen to you if you fall?
18
WHERE IS YOUR GREATEST RISK?
1 2 3 … Hazard Rank …5206
Risk
19
WHERE IS YOUR GREATEST RISK?
1 2 3 … Hazard Rank …5206
Risk
32% of risk in top 1% of hazards
77% of risk in top 10% of hazards
98% of risk in top 50% of hazards
20
PROGRAM CORE ELEMENTS
Management leadership and employee participation
Hazard identification and evaluation
Hazard abatement
Training
Program evaluation
21
HOW DO YOU PICK?
Defeatability
Effe
ctive
ness
Elimination
Substitution
Engineering controls
Administrative controls
Personal protective equipment (PPE)
HIERARCHY OF CONTROL
22
ELIMINATION
BEFORE AFTER
23
SUBSTITUTION
BEFORE AFTER
24
ENGINEERING CONTROLS
Guardrail
25
ABCs (& R) WHEN USING PPE
= Anchorage
= Body support
= Connecting means
= Rescue
A
B
C
R
26
ABCs (& R)
Anchorage>Restraint
>Positioning
>Arrest
>Horizontal lifeline
>Rescue
B
C
R
27
ABCs (& R)
Anchorage
Body support>Full body harness
>Body belts (DO NOT USE!!!)
>Weight limitation
C
R
28
ABCs (& R)
Anchorage
Body support
Connecting means>Connectors
>Lanyards and energy absorbers
>Self retracting devices
>Vertical systems
>Anchorage connectors
R
29
NEW EQUIPMENT STANDARDS
1. ANSI Z359.12-2009: connectors
2. ANSI Z359.13-2009: energy absorbers and lanyards
3. ANSI Z359.14-2012: self-retracting devices
4. ANSI Z359.17-20XX: horizontal lifelines
5. ANSI Z359.11-20XX: harnesses
6. At least three others in coming years.
Available from www.asse.org
30
ABCs (& R)
Anchorage
Body support
Connecting means
Rescue> Self-rescue
> Assisted rescue (internal)
> Assisted rescue (emergency response)
> Professional rope access
31
PROMPT RESCUE
Factors to consider in planning for response
> Hanging vertically in a harness can cause loss of consciousness even in the absence of trauma or blood loss
> The body’s tolerance to suspension trauma varies from person to person
> Rescuing a worker quickly post fall is at least as critical as protecting the worker from a fall
From “Does 911 Work for Rescue?” by Robert N. Aguiluz (September 2003)
AP Photo by Janet B. CampbellErie Times-News, 5/25/2004
32
FALL ARREST: RESIDUAL RISK
Inappropriate anchorage
Fall distance
Swing fall
Equipment malfunction / failure
Maximum arrest force
Post-fall suspension time
Rescue
33
FALL CLEARANCE
Free fall +
Deceleration distance +
Harness effect +
Safety margin
34
SWING FALL
Anchorage needs to be
maintained overhead
Maintain anchorage
connector with 15º over
the location of the
dorsal d-ring
HI
35
Types1. Pre-use: daily when used
2. Formal: every 6 to 12 months
3. Incident: as part of incident investigation
EQUIPMENT INSPECTION
36
EQUIP. INSPECTION – WEBBING HOLE
37
SYSTEM INSPECTION
38
PROCEDURES
39
PROGRAM CORE ELEMENTS
Management leadership and employee participation
Hazard identification and evaluation
Hazard abatement
Training
Program evaluation
40
PROGRAM ROLES
COMPETENT RESCUERCOMPETENT PERSON
System implementation,periodic inspection and use
QUALIFIED PERSON
Policy developmentSystem integrationProgram evaluation
System planning and design
PROGRAM ADMINISTRATOR
System use and daily inspection
AUTHORIZED PERSON AUTHORIZED PERSON AUTHORIZED RESCUER
AUTHORIZED RESCUER
41
DO YOU HAVE THESE?
Training programs
Awareness
Authorized person> System-specific
Competent person
Qualified person
Rescue
42
PROGRAM CORE ELEMENTS
Management leadership and employee participation
Hazard identification and evaluation
Hazard abatement
Training
Program evaluation
43
CALL TO ACTION
1. Evaluate your current practice for fall hazard identification
• Existing hazards
• Future hazards
2. Determine how abatement solutions are selected
3. Identify who needs competent person training
44
THANK YOU FOR JOINING US
Blog> LJBfallprotectionblog.com
Past webinars> Slideshare.net/kmesser
Twitter> @LJBInc
YouTube channel> Youtube.com/LJBinc