ESPON Open Seminar 2014 “Opportunities and threats for territorial cohesion:
description
Transcript of ESPON Open Seminar 2014 “Opportunities and threats for territorial cohesion:
ESPON Open Seminar 2014
“Opportunities and threats for territorial cohesion: Blue Growth and Urban Poverty”
Workshop 1 – Smart development
Territorial cohesion and blue/smart development. BSR evidences
TeMo/Jacek Zaucha
TeMo: Territorial Monitoring for the Baltic Sea Region (BSR)
Objective: To develop a territorial monitoring system for the BSR based on territorial indicators.
TeMo key facts
2
TeMo tried to take sea on board (as a part of BSR) but only indicators on eutrophication have been available.
However, coastal regions are among key regional typologies used by TeMo for analysing territorial cohesion in the BSR. (TeMo has researched in depth only cross-border regions)
TeMo Presentation Tool http://bsr.espon.eu/app_territorial_cohesion.htm
3
TeMo strenght:
conventional indicators
proper territorial typologies
TeMo strenght: conventional indicators &proper territorial typologies
• The seaports and ferry links -> Baltic Sea as big opportunity
• Key airports in the BSR are in fact located in coastal regions
• No direct train connection between Tallinn-Riga and Vilnius, but East-West connections still exist linking the Baltic States ports with Russia (existing main trade flows as historic legacy)
• High the number of important cities located at the sea
But also many peripheral maritime regions
I
TeMo monitors many aspects of Blue Growth
4
What are main territorial trends or observations in the BSR in relation to smart development of the blue economy?
5
Prosperity and smart development takes place mainly in metropolitan regions of the BSR.
Majority of the BSR coastal regions are non-metropolitan. Thus blue development is limited there to traditional sectors: e.g. tourism, fishing,
What are main territorial trends or observations in the BSR in relation to smart development of the blue economy?
6
Prosperity and smart development takes place mainly in metropolitan regions of the BSR.
Majority of the BSR coastal regions are non-metropolitan. Thus blue development is limited there to traditional sectors: e.g. tourism, fishing,
Average annual real change of GDP 2005 - 2010 in the Baltic Sea Region according to various typologies of NUTS3-regions
Non-border
Border
Non-sparse
Sparse
Predominantly urban region
Interm. reg.,close to a city
Intermediate region, remote
Predom. rural reg.,close to a city
Predominantly rural region, remote
Capital cityregion
Second-tiermetro region
Smallermetro region
Other regionCoast
Inland
0.0 %
0.5 %
1.0 %
1.5 %
2.0 %
2.5 %
3.0 %
3.5 %
Typology on urban-rural regions
Typology onmetropolitan regions
External borderregions
Sparsely populatedregions
Typology on coastalregions
Avera
ge c
hange, %
Developing pretty fast but not so fast as inland regions
What are main territorial trends or observations in the BSR in relation to smart development of the blue economy?
7
Prosperity and smart development takes place mainly in metropolitan regions of the BSR.
Majority of the BSR coastal regions are non-metropolitan. Thus blue development is limited there to traditional sectors: e.g. tourism, fishing,
More attractive…
What are main territorial trends or observations in the BSR in relation to smart development of the blue economy?
8
For data on R&D the regions are too large to extract the impact of the sea
But the pattern is rather West versus East than inland versus coastal
Many BSR coastal regions are in a handicapped position in terms of accessibility.
Sea might be a key opportunity for them.
Perhaps not always for development but for maintenance of their economic base (e.g. tourism, mariculture, green-blue energy).
What opportunities and challenges exist in BSR for increasing competitiveness through smart growth of the blue economy?
9
Despite accessibility handicapped and slower GDP growth the BSR coastal regions outpaced other regions in terms of prosperity level (with exception to capital and urban regions).
The question is to what extent is this due to their coastal location? Agglomeration economies ? Rodrik’s determinants?
What opportunities and challenges exist in BSR for increasing competitiveness through smart growth of the blue economy?
10
TeMo can be a perfect tool for observing blue-smart development provided we can agree on:•Definition of the coastal region – NUTS 2 are to large•Need for continuous monitoring of the performance of those regions•How to treat the sea (how to attribute production on the sea – e.g. wind mills to a given territory)? Do we need sea NUTS?•Method on measurement of the benefits provided by ecosystem services.•Definition of maritime (blue) economy.
Which additional evidence is needed for policy makers to better tap the economic blue development potential of the BSR
11
Thank you for your attention
ESPON Open Seminar 2014
“Opportunities and threats for territorial cohesion:
Blue Growth and Urban Poverty”