Equasis Statistics - The World Fleet 2012

8/12/2019 Equasis Statistics - The World Fleet 2012

1/99

The world merchant fleetin 2012

Statistics from Equasis


2/99

2

Table of content

1. Themes and Tables ....................................................................... 32. The Merchant Fleet Population ........................................................ 5

Whole Fleet ...................................................................................................... 6

2.1. Ships by age .................................................................................................... 72.2. Ships by flag .................................................................................................. 122.3.3. Classification Societies ................................................................. 16

Class status ................................................................................................... 183.1. Class status and age ....................................................................................... 223.2. Class status and flag ....................................................................................... 383.3. Safety performance ......................................................................................... 423.4.4. P&I ............................................................................................ 44

P&I status ...................................................................................................... 464.1. IGP&I and age ................................................................................................ 504.2. Non IGP&I and age ......................................................................................... 544.3. P&I and flag ................................................................................................... 584.4. Safety performance ......................................................................................... 624.5.

5. Port State Control ....................................................................... 64Port State Control Overview ............................................................................. 665.1. Ships Inspected Between 2010 and 2012 By Age ............................................. 715.2. Ships Inspected Between 2010 and 2012 By P&I.............................................. 755.3. Ships Inspected Between 2010 and 2012 By Flag ............................................. 795.4. PSC Records of Recognised Organisations .......................................................... 835.5. Statutory Certificates ...................................................................................... 875.6.

6. Trade Associations and Industry Vetting Programmes ...................... 88Scheme status................................................................................................ 906.1. Safety performance ......................................................................................... 916.2. Company performance .................................................................................... 936.3.

Annexes ............................................................................................ 95Annex I. Ship type aggregations ........................................................................... 95Annex II. Targeted Flag States 2012 ...................................................................... 96Annex III. Default PSC Ship types ........................................................................... 97Annex IV. List of Statutory Certificates, by conventions ............................................. 98Annex V. Ships in the scope of Trade Association and vetting programs ...................... 99


3/99

Equasis Statistics (Chapter 1) The world merchant fleet in 2012

3

1.Themes and TablesINTRODUCTION

This report provides a picture of theworlds merchant fleet in 2012, derivedfrom data contained in the Equasisdatabase. It examines the structure andcharacteristics of the fleet and itsperformance. The statistics are groupedinto themes which could be of interest tothe industry and regulators.

The themes are as follows:1. The Merchant Fleet Population2. Classification Societies3. P&I4. Port State Control5. Vetting Programmes and Trade

Associations

OVERVIEW

Equasis is populated with data from most

of the worlds merchant ships. Basic shipparticulars are derived from thecommercial database of IHS Fairplay.

From a commercial and regulatory point ofview, size and type of ship are two keycriteria and therefore throughout thisreport the statistical analysis is based onthese two elements. For the Port StateControl theme, ships will be divided intoship type categories derived from PSCdatabases.

SIZE

By size ships are grouped into fourcategories:1. Small ships 100 GT to 499 GT2. Medium ships 500 GT to 24.999 GT3. Large ships 25.000 GT to 59.999 GT4. Very Large ships 60.000 GT

The small ships size category reflects themain tonnage threshold for merchantships to comply with the SOLAS

Convention. This category also includesmany ships which do not tradeinternationally and therefore are not

covered by the International Conventionsor the port State Control regimes. Asignificant proportion of these vessels arealso too small to be covered byclassification societies and the vetting andtrading organisations. They have,therefore, been excluded from most of theanalysis in order to avoid distortion of thetotals for ships which are generallycovered by the International Legislation,port State Control , classification societies

and other trade organisations. To providedata for the whole fleet, small ships areincluded in Chapters 2.1 and 2.2, and inthe multiple inspection figures in Chapters5.1 and 5.6. Small ships are also takeninto consideration when evaluating thefleet size of a company and the detentionrate in Chapter 6.3.

Regulatory and commercial tonnagethresholds are not common to all shiptypes. As a compromise, categories

medium, large and very-large (ie: 2, 3and 4) have been chosen so as to dividethe fleet into three approximately equalparts in terms of tonnage. These threetogether represent the larger worldwidetrading ships.

SHIP TYPES

Equasis uses over 100 descriptions of shiptype provided by IHS Fairplay. For thisreport these types have been aggregatedinto 12 main types as follows:

General Cargo Ships Specialized Cargo Ships Container Ships Ro-Ro Cargo Ships Bulk Carriers Oil and Chemical Tankers Gas Tankers Other Tankers Passenger Ships Offshore Vessels Service Ships

Tugs

Chapter 1


4/99


4

Annex I outlines how this aggregation hasbeen accomplished. This Annex isregularly reviewed to include new shiptypes that were excluded in the previousversions of the Statistics but should nowbe included, to better reflect the situationof the world merchant fleet.

PSC SHIP TYPES

PSC organisations are now using specificship type categories that are differentfrom the ones used by IHS Fairplay. From2011 onward, these categories have beenused in Chapter 5 for ship types.

For ships that have never been inspectedor when the ship type is not reported inthe PSC data provided to Equasis, it is notpossible to attribute a PSC ship type

easily. In this situation, a default PSCship type is used in substitution of agenuine PSC ship type.

This default PSC ship type is based on theship type as provided by IHS Fairplay.Annex III provides the aggregation usedfor this purpose. This Annex wasestablished mainly through statisticalanalysis and direct comparisons betweenIHS Fairplay ship types and PSC shiptypes. It cannot be directly compared to

Annex I as the intention is not to createcategories of ships, but to attribute a PSCship type to ships that were not inspected.

FLAG STATES

Flag States (under which ships areregistered) are grouped in two categories,

targeted and non-targeted. Those inthe targeted group are the flag Stateswhich appear on at least one of thetargeted lists of the Paris Memorandum of

Understanding (MoU) [Black List], theTokyo MoU [Black List] and the USCG[safety targeting]. Indian Ocean MoU (IOMoU) and Via del Mar (VDM) also providetheir inspection results to Equasis, butthey do not use a targeted list.

The lists are published annually andreflect the safety performance of shipsregistered to each flag State as measuredby the number of port State inspectionsand detentions recorded over a three-yearperiod.

It is possible for a flag State to betargeted in one regime but not in

another. This can be because its safetyperformance varies from one regime toanother, or, because few, or none, of itsships trade to ports covered by aparticular MoU.

Further details are included in the list of

the respective regimes port State ControlAnnual Reports. The list of targeted flagStates, based on the 2012 annual reportsof the Paris MoU, the Tokyo MoU and theUS Coast Guard, can be found in Annex II.

SOURCE OF INFORMATION

Equasis is fed by 45 data providers whichcan be divided into six categories: coreship and company data, PSC regimes,classification societies, P&I clubs,associations or vetting programs and

other international organisations. Almostall these sources are used in thisdocument to a greater or lesser extent.

As to PSC information, it should be notedthat not all inspections within the IndianOcean MoU are reported in Equasis. Onlyinspections from Australia, India, Iran,South Africa, Sri-Lanka and Mauritius areconsidered in these statistics. In 2012,these six countries represented about90% of all inspections carried out within

the Indian Ocean MoU.

The Via del Mar agreement is alsoproviding data to Equasis since mid-2011.Therefore, inspections from the 1st ofJanuary 2012. have been integrated intothis report


5/99


5

2.The Merchant Fleet Population

INTRODUCTION

The tables in this chapter provide apicture of the fleet of ships in Equasis interms of type, size, age and the flagunder which the ship is registered.

RESULTS

Graph 1 shows that by number, the

Equasis fleet is dominated (82%) by smalland medium sized ships up to 24.999 GT.Small ships alone represent 36% bynumber, although only 1% by tonnage.Many of the small ships are not subject tointernational conventions on safety andpollution prevention because of their sizeor because they do not tradeinternationally. However some flag Statesdo require these vessels to apply thesame standards

General cargo ships are the most commontype by number, at 20.2%, of the Equasisfleet. However, most of these are smalland medium-sized. In the large and verylarge categories, oil and chemical tankersand bulk carriers represent well over halfof the fleet by number.

In terms of tonnage, the large and verylarge size categories represent 79% of theEquasis fleet (Graph 2), with oil andchemical tankers and bulk carriersdominating both categories at 67.7%(large) and 65.1% (very large)respectively.

Table 3 shows that just over a half(51.4%) of the Equasis fleet, by number,is 15 years or older. However, this is duelargely to the dominance of older ships inthe small and medium ship sizecategories. The trend is reversed in thelarge and very large ship size categories,where 79.8% (large) and 86.2% (verylarge) are less than 15 years old.

Graph 4 shows that the most modernfleets correspond to the biggest ships in

tonnage. Looking back at the statistics ofthe previous years, it is clear that theyounger ships are bigger than theirpredecessors. This trend continues eachyear. The statistics show that the biggestships are recent additions to the fleet.

Graph 13 shows that about a third (36%)of the total number of ships areassociated with a targeted flag State.Whilst graphs 15 to 20 show that the

proportion of ships under a targeted flagState decrease with size: 37% for themedium size ship size category, 33% forthe large category and 29% for the verylarge. The figures are very close withrespect to number and tonnage.

Tables 13 and 14 both show that for thetargeted flag States, General Cargo shipsare the most inspected ship category bynumber (31.9%) but Bulk Carriers are themost inspected ship category by tonnage

(43.2%). It is natural considering thatthose two ship categories are also thebiggest with respect to the total numberof ships and tonnage, all be it with smallerproportions (23.3% and 34.5%respectively).

This is the opposite for Offshore Vessels,Container Ships and Oil & ChemicalTankers which tend to have a largerproportion of inspections originating fromnon-targeted flag States.

Chapter 2


6/99


6

WHOLE FLEET2.1.

Table 1 - World fleet : total number of ships, by type and size

Source:Equasis (1) GT


7/99


8/99


9/99


10/99


11/99


11

+25 YEARS OLD SHIPS

Table 11 - Total number of +25 years old ships, by type and size



12/99


12

SHIPS BY FLAG2.3.

WHOLE FLEET GT500

Table 13 - World fleet GT500: total number of ships, by type and flag

Source:Equasis

Table 14 - World fleet GT500: gross tonnage (in 1000 t) of ships, by type and flag

Source:Equasis

Graph 13 - World fleet GT500: total number of ships,by flag

Graph 14 - World fleet GT500: gross tonnage of ships,by flag


13/99


13

MEDIUM SHIPS

Table 15 - Total number of medium(1)ships, by type and flag

Source:Equasis (1) 500GT


14/99


14

LARGE SHIPS

Table 17 - Total number of large(1)ships, by type and flag

Source:Equasis (1) 25.000GT


15/99


15

VERY LARGE SHIPS

Table 19 - Total number of very large(1)ships, by type and flag

Source:Equasis (1) GT60.000

Table 20 - Gross tonnage (in 1000 t) of very large(1)ships, by type and flag

Source:Equasis (1) GT60.000

Graph 19 - Total number of very large ships, by flag Graph 20 - Gross tonnage of very large ships, by flag


16/99


16

3.Classification SocietiesINTRODUCTION

Classification Societies provide technicaland surveying services for the shippingindustry and the flag States. On the onehand, they survey the ship on behalf ofthe owner and issue a class certificate forthe ship. On the other hand, they may bemandated by flag States to undertakestatutory surveys on their behalf asRecognised Organisations. The main

classification societies worldwide aremembers of the International Associationof Classification Societies (IACS).

This chapter and all other tables andgraphs dealing with ClassificationSocieties in this publication, with theexception of Chapters 5.5 and 5.6, onlyrefer to the class function; they onlyindicate the society that issue the classcertificates for a particular ship. It doesnot necessarily follow that the same

society is also acting as a RecognisedOrganisation on behalf of the ships flagState.

In 2012, IACS consisted of 13 membersocieties:

American Bureau of Shipping (ABS) Bureau Veritas (BV) China Classification Society (CCS) Croatian Register of Shipping

(CRS) Det Norske Veritas (DNV) Germanischer Lloyd (GL) Indian Register of Shipping (IRS) Korean Register of Shipping (KR) Lloyd's Register of Shipping (LR) Nippon Kaiji Kyokai (NK) Polish Register of Shipping (PRS) Registro Italiano Navale (RINA) Russian Maritime Register of

Shipping (RS)

The tables in this chapter show theproportion of the Equasis fleet GT500, in

each ship size category and ship type,which were classed with members of IACSand those classed with Classification

Societies which were not members ofIACS. Data on class comes from IACSmembers, and for non-IACS ClassificationSocieties the information is supplied byIHS Fairplay when available.

There are about 8,757 ships for which noclassification data is available at all inEquasis. This equates to a tonnage of17,124,000 tons, which represents 11%by number and 2% by tonnage of the

entire fleet. When considering only shipsabove 500GT, the figures drop to 3,856ships, representing a tonnage of 15,888tons (8% and 1% respectively). They aremainly small tugs and small to mediumgeneral cargo ships. For simplicityreasons, but also because the IACSClassification Societies provide their datadirectly to Equasis (ie: absence ofinformation means they are not classed byIACS), these ships are grouped with non-IACS ships under the heading Non-

IACS/No Record.

In chapter 3.3 the fleet is analysedaccording to class and flag State status.Flag States are grouped in two categories,targeted and non-targeted, as explainedin Chapter1.

In Chapter 3.4 the detention rate of shipsis the ratio between the number ofdetentions and the number of inspectionsin the Paris MoU, Tokyo MoU, Indian

Ocean MoU (IO MoU) and USCG regions in2012. All detentions are taken intoaccount, irrespective of whether or not thedeficiencies giving rise to the detentionwere indicated by PSC as being related tothe activities of the ClassificationSociety/Recognised Organisation.

RESULTS

Graph 21 shows that the Equasis fleetover 500 GT is dominated by ships classed

by IACS members (77% by number and96% by tonnage).

Chapter 3


17/99


17

This proportion is reflected in most of theship types although general cargo shipsaccount for just under half (43.3%) ofthe worlds fleet over 500GT that are notIACS classed (Table 21). Graphs 23 to 28show that the IACS share increases withthe size of the ship, with 98% and 99.6%

of the large and very large ship sizecategory, by number and tonnage, beingclassified by IACS members. Shipscovered by non-IACS members are almostall medium sized (Tables 23, 25, 27).

Graphs 29, 37, 45 and 53 show that theIACS members coverage is greater amongthe younger fleet and tends to diminishwith age from 92% of ships aged up to5 years to 45% of the fleet over 25 yearsold.

The safety performance of the Equasisfleet over 500 GT, as measured bydetention rate, shows that 3.4% ofinspections resulted in detention in 2012.Those ships using a Class Society that is amember of IACS were less likely to bedetained in 2012 (2.67%) than thoseclassed with non-IACS members or withno recorded class (11.04%).

The number of inspections on vessels inthe large and very large ship size category

with a non-IACS class or no recorded classis too small to be statistically significant,and the 0% detention rate for thesecategories is meaningless. This is becauseit is based on only 46 inspections on 18different ships for the large ship sizecategory and 14 inspections on 8 differentships for the very large size category (tobe compared to 5351 inspections on 1894ships for the medium ship size category ofships with non-IACS or no recorded class).


18/99


18

CLASS STATUS3.1.

WORLD FLEET GT500 :TOTAL NUMBER OF SHIPS, BY TYPE AND CLASS

Table 21 - World fleet GT500 : total number of ships, by type and class

Source:Equasis - IACS membership on 31/12/2012

Table 22 - World fleet GT500 : gross tonnage (in 1000 t) of ships, by type and class

Source: Equasis - IACS membership on 31/12/2012

Graph 21 - World fleet GT500 : total number of ships,by class

Graph 22 - World fleet GT500 : gross tonnage of ships,by class


19/99


19

MEDIUM SHIPS

Table 23 - Total number of medium(1)ships, by type and class

Source: Equasis - (1) 500GT


20/99


20

LARGE SHIPS

Table 25 - Total number of large(1)ships, by type and class

Source:Equasis - (1) 25.000GT


21/99


21

VERY LARGE SHIPS

Table 27 - Total number of very large(1)ships, by type and class

Source:Equasis - (1) GT60.000 - IACS membership on 31/12/2012

Table 28 - Gross tonnage (in 1000 t) of very large(1)ships, by type and class


Graph 27 - Total number of very large ships, by class Graph 28 - Gross tonnage of very large ships, by class


22/99


22

CLASS STATUS AND AGE3.2.

0-4 YEARS OLD SHIPS

Table 29 - World fleet GT500: total number of 0-4 years old ships, by type and class


Table 30 - World fleet GT500: gross tonnage (in 1000 t) of ships 0-4 years old, by type and class


Graph 29 - World fleet GT500: total number of 0-4years old ships, by class

Graph 30 - World fleet GT500: gross tonnage of 0-4years old of ships, by class


23/99


24/99


24

0-4 YEARS OLD LARGE SHIPS

Table 33 - Total number of 0-4 years old large(1)ships, by type and class


Table 34 - Gross tonnage (in 1000 t) of 0-4 years old large(1)ships, by type and class


Graph 33 - Total number of 0-4 years old large ships, byclass

Graph 34 - Gross tonnage of 0-4 years old large ships,by class


25/99


25

0-4 YEARS OLD VERY LARGE SHIPS

Table 35 - Total number of 0-4 years old very large(1)ships, by type and class


Table 36 - Gross tonnage (in 1000 t) of 0-4 years old very large(1)ships, by type and class


Graph 35 - Total number of 0-4 years old very largeships, by class

Graph 36 - Gross tonnage of 0-4 years old very largeships, by class


26/99


26

5-14 YEARS OLD SHIPS





Graph 37 - World fleet GT500: total number of 5-14years old ships, by class

Graph 38 - World fleet GT500: gross tonnage of 5-14years old of ships, by class


27/99


27

5-14 YEARS OLD MEDIUM SHIPS

Table 39 - Total number of 5-14 years old medium(1)ships, by type and class


Table 40 - Gross tonnage (in 1000 t) of 5-14 years old medium(1)ships, by type and class


Graph 39 - Total number of 5-14 years old mediumships, by class

Graph 40 - Gross tonnage of 5-14 years old mediumships, by class


28/99


28






Graph 41 - Total number of 5-14 years old large ships,by class

Graph 42 - Gross tonnage of 5-14 years old large ships,by class


29/99


29









30/99


30

15-24 YEARS OLD SHIPS





Graph 45 - World fleet GT500: total number of 15-24

years old ships, by class

Graph 46 - World fleet GT500: gross tonnage of 15-24

years old of ships, by class


31/99


31

15-24 YEARS OLD MEDIUM SHIPS

Table 47 - Total number of 15-24 years old medium(1)ships, by type and class


Table 48 - Gross tonnage (in 1000 t) of 15-24 years old medium(1)ships, by type and class


Graph 47 - Total number of 15-24 years old mediumships, by class

Graph 48 - Gross tonnage of 15-24 years old mediumships, by class


32/99


32






Graph 49 - Total number of 15-24 years old large ships,by class

Graph 50 - Gross tonnage of 15-24 years old largeships, by class


33/99


33









34/99


34

25+ YEARS OLD SHIPS

Table 53 - World fleet GT500: total number of 25+ years old ships, by type and class


Table 54 - World fleet GT500: gross tonnage (in 1000 t) of ships 25+ years old, by type and class


Graph 53 - World fleet GT500: total number of 25+years old ships, by class

Graph 54 - World fleet GT500: gross tonnage of 25+years old of ships, by class


35/99


36/99


36

25+ YEARS OLD LARGE SHIPS

Table 57 - Total number of 25+ years old large(1)ships, by type and class



37/99


37

25+ YEARS OLD VERY LARGE SHIPS

Table 59 - Total number of 25+ years old very large(1)ships, by type and class



38/99


38

CLASS STATUS AND FLAG3.3.

WORLD FLEET GT500

Table 61 - World fleet GT500: total number of ships by type, class and flag



39/99


40/99


40

LARGE SHIPS

Table 65 - Total number of large(1)ships by type, class and flag



41/99


41

VERY LARGE SHIPS

Table 67 - Total number of very large(1)ships by type, class and flag


Table 68 - Gross tonnage (in 1000 t) of very large(1)ships by type, class and flag


Graph 67 - Total number of very large ships, by classand flag

Graph 68 - Gross tonnage of very large ships, by classand flag


42/99


42

SAFETY PERFORMANCE3.4.

WORLD FLEET GT500

Table 69 - World fleet GT500 detention rates(*), by type and class

Source:Equasis - IACS membership on 31/12/2012 - (*) Detentions in Paris MoU, Tokyo MoU, IO MoU and USCG divided by total number of inspections

MEDIUM SHIPS

Table 70 - Medium(1)ships detention rates(*), by type and class



43/99


43

LARGE SHIPS

Table 71 - Large(1)ships detention rates(*), by type and class


VERY LARGE SHIPS

Table 72 - Very large(1)ships detention rates(*), by type and class



44/99


44

4.P&IINTRODUCTION

Protection and Indemnity (P&I) Clubsprovide third-party insurance cover to shipowners. Members of the InternationalGroup of P&I Clubs (IGP&I) provideEquasis with information on all vesselsusing their clubs which have IMOnumbers.

There are thirteen separate andindependent principal Clubs in the IGP&I.Some of the Clubs have affiliated andreinsured subsidiary associations:

American Steamship Owners MutualProtection and Indemnity Association,Inc

Assuranceforeningen Skuld

Gard P&I (Bermuda) Ltd.1

The Britannia Steam Ship InsuranceAssociation Limited

The Japan Ship Owners' MutualProtection & Indemnity Association

The London Steam-Ship Owners'Mutual Insurance Association Limited

The North of England Protecting &Indemnity Association Limited

The Shipowners' Mutual Protection &Indemnity Association (Luxembourg)

The Standard Steamship OwnersProtection & Indemnity Association(Bermuda) Limited

2

1 Gard (Bermuda) Ltd only became a principalAssociation with effect from the 2010 policyyear. Previously, the principal Association wasAssuranceforeningen Gard.2Since July 2012, the Standard Steamship OwnersProtection & Indemnity Association (Bermuda) Ltdhas changed its name to "The Standard ClubLimited

The Steamship Mutual UnderwritingAssociation (Bermuda) Limited

The Swedish Club

United Kingdom Mutual Steam ShipAssurance Association (Bermuda)Limited

The West of England Ship OwnersMutual Insurance Association

(Luxembourg)

It should be noted that there is asignificant number of small ships of lessthan 100GT entered in the IGP&I data butas explained in Chapter1, small ships arenot included in the statistics which follow.

The following Tables show the proportionof the fleet, in each ship size category andship type, which is registered with theclubs in the IGP&I (column headed

IGP&I), compared to the proportion ofships (column headed Non IGP&I) whichare either:

insured with a club which is not amember of the IGP&I ;

covered by commercial insurancefor which information isunavailable ;

not covered by P&I insurance.

In chapter 4.4 the fleet is analysedaccording to P&I and flag State status.Flag States are grouped in two categories,targeted and non-targeted, as explainedin Chapter 1.

In Chapter 4.5 the detention rate of shipsis the ratio between the number ofdetentions and the number of inspectionsin the Paris MoU, Tokyo MoU, IndianOcean MoU (IO MoU) and USCG regions.

RESULTS

Graph 69 indicates that for vessels over500GT in Equasis, for which data has beensupplied, 62% are covered by one of the

Chapter 4


45/99


45

members of the IGP&I. This rises to 92%by tonnage.

Graphs 71 to 76 show that 95% of thelarge and 98% of the very large ship sizecategories are covered by the members ofthe IGP&I. Within the medium ship size

category just under a half (48%) arecovered by number, which equates toabout 71% in tonnage.

Comparing Graph 77 with Graph 85reveals that the age profile of shipscovered by the members of the IGP&I isconsiderably younger than those whichare not. A third (37%) of the IGP&I fleetis under 5 years old and only 10% is over25 years old. Of the younger fleet, morethan half are either chemical tankers orbulk carriers (Table 81). This trend ismore marked in the large and very largeship size categories. For non-IGP&Imembers the trend is reversed, as only14% of the fleet is under 5 years old and51% is over 25 years old, with 43.5% ofthe older fleet being general cargo ships(Table 89).

The safety performance of vessels over500GT that are included in Equasis, asmeasured by detention rates, shows that3.4% of inspections resulted in detention

in 2012. Table 105 shows that shipsinsured by companies outside the IGP&Ihad a higher detention rate in 2012 thanthose that are members (8.01%compared with 2.35%).

The number of inspections on ships in thevery large ship size category and coveredby non-IGP&I members is too small to bestatistically significant and the 0%detention rate for this category ismeaningless, as it is based on only 65

inspections on 44 different ships.


46/99


46

P&I STATUS4.1.

WORLD FLEET GT500

Table 73 - P&I world fleet GT500 status : total number of ships, by type

Source:Equasis

Table 74 - P&I world fleet GT500 status : gross tonnage (in 1000 t) of ships, by type

Source:Equasis

Graph 69 - Number of ships GT500, by P&I status Graph 70 - Gross tonnage of ships GT500, by P&Istatus


47/99


47

MEDIUM SHIPS

Table 75 - P&I status : total number of medium(1)ships, by type

Source:Equasis - (1) 500GT


48/99


48

LARGE SHIPS

Table 77 - P&I status : total number of large(1)ships, by type



49/99


50/99


51/99


51

MEDIUM SHIPS

Table 83 - IGP&I : total number of medium(1)ships, by type and age

Source:Equasis -

(1)

500GT


52/99


52

LARGE SHIPS

Table 85 - IGP&I : total number of large(1)ships, by type and age

Source:Equasis -

(1)

25.000GT


53/99


53

VERY LARGE SHIPS

Table 87 - IGP&I : total number of very large(1)ships, by type and age

Source:Equasis -

(1)

GT60.000

Table 88 - IGP&I : gross tonnage (in 1000 t) of very large(1)ships, by type and age

Source:Equasis - (1) GT60.000

Graph 83 - IGP&I very large ships, by age Graph 84 - Gross tonnage of IGP&I very large ships, byage


54/99


55/99


55

MEDIUM SHIPS

Table 91 - Non IGP&I : total number of medium(1)ships, by type and age

Source:Equasis -

(1)

500GT


56/99


56

LARGE SHIPS

Table 93 - Non IGP&I : total number of large(1)ships, by type and age

Source:Equasis -

(1)

25.000GT


57/99


57

VERY LARGE SHIPS

Table 95 - Non IGP&I : total number of very large(1)ships, by type and age

Source:Equasis -

(1)

GT60.000

Table 96 - Non IGP&I : gross tonnage (in 1000 t) of very large(1)ships, by type and age


Graph 91 - Non IGP&I very large ships, by age Graph 92 - Gross tonnage of non IGP&I very largeships, by age


58/99


58

P&I AND FLAG4.4.

WORLD FLEET GT500

Table 97 - P&I world fleet GT500 status : total number of ships, by type and flag2012

Source:Equasis

Table 98 - P&I world fleet GT500 status : gross tonnage (in 1000 t) of ships, by type and flag

Source:Equasis

Graph 93 - Total number of ships GT500, by P&I

status and flag

Graph 94 - Gross tonnage of ships GT500, by P&I

status and flag


59/99


59

MEDIUM SHIPS

Table 99 - P&I status : total number of medium(1)ships, by type and flag- 2012

Source:Equasis -

(1)

500GT


60/99


60

LARGE SHIPS

Table 101 -P&I status : total number of large(1)ships, by type and flag

Source:Equasis -

(1)

25.000GT


61/99


61

VERY LARGE SHIPS

Table 103 -P&I status : total number of very large(1)ships, by type and flag- 2012

Source:Equasis -

(1)

GT60.000

Table 104 -P&I status : gross tonnage (in 1000 t) of very large(1)ships, by type and flag- 2012


Graph 99 - Total number of very large ships, by P&Istatus and flag

Graph 100 -Gross tonnage of very large ships, by P&Istatus and flag


62/99


62


WHOLE FLEET GT500

Table 105 -Whole fleet GT500 detention rate(*), by type and P&I status

Source:Equasis - (*) Detentions in Paris MoU, Tokyo MoU, IO MoU and USCG divided by total number of inspections

MEDIUM SHIPS

Table 106 -Medium(1)ships detention rates(*), by type and P&I status



63/99


63

LARGE SHIPS

Table 107 -Large(1)ships detention rates(*), by type and P&I status



64/99


64

5.Port State ControlINTRODUCTION

Port State Control authorities check thecompliance with International Conventionsof foreign ships visiting their ports.Equasis includes inspection data providedby four of the regional Port State Controlregimes, Paris MoU, Tokyo MoU, IndianOcean MoU (IO MoU) and U.S. CoastGuard (USCG). The following tables showthe level of annual inspections by theseregimes.

Via del Mar has joined Equasis in 2012and the data from that region is reflectedin Statistics for the year 2012 only.Therefore, in the tables and graphs thatinclude inspections over the last 3 years(2010-2012), only include data from Viadel Mar.in the figures for 2012

PSC SHIP TYPE

As explained in Chapter 1, this chapterhas been revised in 2011 to use the PSCship types employed during inspections,instead of the generic and commercialship types used in the other chapters.

It needs to be noted that, for consistencyreasons, the fleet considered is exactlythe same as that used in other chapters.It means that some inspections are notcounted in this chapter if the ship is notactive anymore or if the ship has a

commercial ship type that is consideredto be out of the scope of these statistics.

INSPECTED SHIPS

Ships are subject to port State Controlinspections in most parts of the world, butEquasis received data only from five PSCregimes. Some ships do not trade to theparticipating maritime authorities of thesefive MoUsor in some cases have not beeninspected when they have visited them. Inaddition, some ships are not eligible forPSC inspections either because of theirsize or type, or they are only engaged in

domestic trade. However, these vesselsare mainly confined to the small ship sizecategory. Therefore, there is a portion ofthe eligible fleet without a port StateControl inspection record in Equasis.

A significant portion of this withoutinspection record fleet, particularlythosein the very large, large and medium shipsize category, could potentially be tradingin the waters of these PSC regimes or are

trading using ports in these areas. Theinspection figures show the proportion ofthe fleet which have been inspected byone of the four PSC regimes in the last 3years and in 2012 for Via del Mar.Therefore the proportion of fleet that havenot been inspected can be calculated. Thefigures are sorted by size and PSC typewith details per age ranges, flag State andP&I coverage.

RECOGNISED ORGANISATIONS

Information on the RecognisedOrganisations used by vessels are nowincluded in this chapter. The data used isbased on the statutory certificatesrecorded at the time of inspection.Recognised Organisations are ClassSocieties working on behalf of a flag stateto survey ships under their flag and certifythat they comply with the relevantinternational conventions.

In Equasis, information about RecognisedOrganisations is provided through PSCinspections. However, only the Paris MoUand the Indian MoU provide thisinformation to Equasis.

Table 142 provides the total number ofinspections in which a statutory certificatehas been recorded by the Port StateControl Officer (PSCO) for each type ofcertificate. It also specifies the number ofinspections where this certificate has been

recorded by the PSCO by issuer (flagState or RO).

Chapter 5


65/99


65

Please, note than during an inspection,several certificates are usually checked.Additionally a group of certificates in thetable may refer to more than onecertificate and each may be issued bydifferent authorities. For these reasons,total figures cannot be easily deducted by

summing lines or columns in Table 142

The list of certificates by group is given inAnnex IV. The group Other covers allunlisted certificates.

RESULTS

Table 114 reveals that of the 50,628 shipsover 500GT in the fleet covered byEquasis, 65% (32673) were inspected atleast once in the period 2010-2012. This

equates to 88% by tonnage. Tables 111and 112 show that this proportion is 56%in 2012 (28473).

Table 111 shows that the number ofindividual ships inspected increasedsteadily in the period 2002 to 2011, with asmall decrease in 2012. The number ofindividual ships increased in 2011, due tothe new Inspection Regime in the ParisMoU region.

Regionally, Table 112 and Graph 104indicate that in 2012 there was a greatertendency towards multiple inspections ofships in the Tokyo MoU region than in theother regions. In contrast, in the ParisMoU, 80% of the inspections areundertaken on different ships. This can beexplained by the new inspection regime inplace in the Paris MoU region whichtargets priority ships that have not beeninspected for a certain time (6 months,one year or two years depending on thesituation of each ship).

Tables 109 and 110 show that themajority of ships without an inspectionrecord are in the small or medium shipsize category (97% in number).

By age, Table 114 shows that older shipshave been subjected to fewer inspectionsthan newer ships. Additionally ships withIGP&I coverage have also been subjectedto more inspections. The explanation forthis is not evident, but a possibility would

be that the majority of old ships and shipsnot covered by IGP&I are not operating in

the regions for which Equasis has PSCdata.

Table 130 shows that, as expected, shipswith targeted flag States are subjected tomore inspections than those of non-targeted flag States .

Table 138 shows that issuers of statutorycertificates are, in majority, RecognisedOrganisations that are member of IACS.About 96% of the inspections of shipsover 500GT have at least one statutorycertificate issued by a RecognisedOrganisation that is member of IACS.

Table 142 shows that the involvement offlag States differs greatly depending onthe statutory certificates. The MinimumSafe Manning Document (SOLAS/STCW),the Continuous Synopsis Record(SOLAS/CSR) and the BunkeringCertificate are the statutory certificatesthat are, in majority, issued by the flagState. Flag States are also more involvedin issuing the ISPS (that ensures securityon ships), especially those that aretargeted by PSC. Finally, Flag States aremore involved in SOLAS requirementswhile Recognised Organisations areheavily involved in MARPOL certificates.


66/99


66

PORT STATE CONTROL OVERVIEW5.1.

OVERVIEW OF INSPECTED SHIPS IN ALL PSC REGIONS (2010-2012)

Table 109 -The world fleet in Equasis, by PSC type and size (GT100)



67/99


67

Graph 101 -Total number of inspected ships (all sizes), by PSC type

Graph 102 -Gross tonnage (in 1000 t) of inspected ships (all sizes), by PSC type


68/99


68

MULTIPLE INSPECTIONS (2002-2012)

Table 111 -Total number of individual ships inspected(*), by number of inspections per ship2002-2012

Source:Equasis Paris MoU, Tokyo MoU, IO MoU, US Coast Guard- (*) Existing ship types in Equasis

Graph 103 -Total number of individual ships inspected(*), by number of inspections per ship2002-2012

(*) Existing ship types in Equasis


69/99


69

INSPECTION FREQUENCY BY PSC REGIONS (2012)

Table 112 -Total number of individual ships inspected(*), by number of inspection per ship and by PSC region

Source:Equasis Paris MoU, Tokyo MoU, IO MoU, US Coast Guard- (*) All existing ship types in Equasis

Graph 104 -Total number of individual ships inspected(*), by number of inspection per ship and PSC region

(*) All existing ship types in Equasis


70/99


70

INSPECTIONS IN MORE THAN ONE REGION (2012)

Table 113 -Total number of individual ships inspected per number of PSC regions

Source:Equasis Paris MoU, Tokyo MoU, IO MoU, US Coast Guard

Graph 105 -Ships inspected per number of PSC regions, by type


71/99


71

SHIPS INSPECTED BETWEEN 2010 AND 2012 BY AGE5.2.

WHOLE FLEET GT500

Table 114 - Total number of ships GT500 with and without inspections, by PSC type and age

Table 115 -Gross tonnage (in 1000 t) of ships GT500 with and without inspections, by PSC type and age

Graph 106 -Proportion of inspected ships GT500, byage

Graph 107 -Proportion of gross tonnage inspected shipsGT500, by age


72/99


72

MEDIUM SHIPS

Table 116 -Total number of medium ships with and without inspections, by PSC type and age

Table 117 -Gross tonnage (in 1000 t) of medium ships with and without inspections, by PSC type and age

Graph 108 -Proportion of medium inspected ships , by

age

Graph 109 -Proportion of gross tonnage for medium

inspected ships, by age


73/99


73

LARGE SHIPS

Table 118 -Total number of large ships with and without inspections, by PSC type and age

Table 119 -Gross tonnage (in 1000 t) of large ships with and without inspections, by PSC type and age

Graph 110 -Proportion of large inspected ships, by age Graph 111 -Proportion of gross tonnage for largeinspected ships, by age


74/99


74

VERY LARGE SHIPS

Table 120 -Total number of very large ships with and without inspections, by age and size

Table 121 -Gross tonnage (in 1000 t) of very large ships with and without inspections, by age and size

Graph 112 -Proportion of very large inspected ships, byage

Graph 113 -Proportion of gross tonnage for very largeinspected ships, by age


75/99


75

SHIPS INSPECTED BETWEEN 2010 AND 2012 BY P&I5.3.

WHOLE FLEET GT500

Table 122 -Total number of ships GT500 with and without inspections, by PSC type and P&I status

Table 123 -Gross tonnage (in 1000 t) of ships GT500 with and without inspections, by PSC type and P&I status

Graph 114 -Proportion of inspected ships GT500, byP&I status

Graph 115 -Proportion of gross tonnage for inspectedships GT500, by P&I status


76/99


76

MEDIUM SHIPS

Table 124 -Total number of medium ships with and without inspections, by PSC type and P&I status

Table 125 -Gross tonnage (in 1000 t) of medium ships with and without inspections, by PSC type and P&I status

Graph 116 -Proportion of medium inspected ships, by

P&I status

Graph 117 -Proportion of gross tonnage for medium

inspected ships, by P&I status


77/99


77

LARGE SHIPS

Table 126 -Total number of large ships with and without inspections, by PSC type and P&I status

Table 127 -Gross tonnage (in 1000 t) of large ships with and without inspections, by PSC type and P&I status

Graph 118 -Proportion of large inspected ships, by P&I

status

Graph 119 -Proportion of gross tonnage for large



78/99


78

VERY LARGE SHIPS

Table 128 -Total number of very large ships with and without inspections, by PSC type and P&I status

Table 129 -Gross tonnage (in 1000 t) of very large ships with and without inspections, by PSC type and P&I status

Graph 120 -Proportion of very large inspected ships, by

P&I status

Graph 121 -Proportion of gross tonnage for very large



79/99


79

SHIPS INSPECTED BETWEEN 2010 AND 2012 BY FLAG5.4.

WHOLE FLEET GT500

Table 130 -Total number of ships GT500 with and without inspections, by PSC type and flag

Table 131 -Gross tonnage (in 1000 t) of ships GT500 with and without inspections, by PSC type and flag

Graph 122 -Proportion of inspected ships GT500, byflag

Graph 123 -Proportion of gross tonnage for inspectedships GT500, by flag


80/99


80

MEDIUM SHIPSTable 132 -Total number of medium ships with and without inspections, by PSC type and flag

Table 133 -Gross tonnage (in 1000 t) of medium ships with and without inspections, by PSC type and flag

Graph 124 -Proportion of medium inspected ships, byflag

Graph 125 -Proportion of gross tonnage for mediuminspected ships, by flag


81/99


81

LARGE SHIPSTable 134 -Total number of large ships with and without inspections, by PSC type and flag

Table 135 -Gross tonnage (in 1000 t) of large ships with and without inspections, by PSC type and flag

Graph 126 -Proportion of large inspected ships, by flag Graph 127 -Proportion of gross tonnage for largeinspected ships, by flag


82/99


82

VERY LARGE SHIPSTable 136 -Total number of very large ships with and without inspections, by PSC type and flag

Table 137 -Gross tonnage (in 1000 t) of very large ships with and without inspections, by PSC type and flag

Graph 128 -Proportion of very large inspected ships, byflag

Graph 129 -Proportion of gross tonnage for very largeinspected ships, by flag


83/99


83

PSC RECORDS OF RECOGNISED ORGANISATIONS5.5.

WHOLE FLEET GT500

Table 138 -Total number of inspections with statutory certificates for ships GT500,by type of issuer

Graph 130 -Total number of inspection with statutorycertificates for ships GT500, by flag issuer

Graph 131 -Total number of inspection with statutorycertificates for ships GT500, by recognisedorganisations


84/99


84

MEDIUM SHIPS

Table 139 -Total number of inspections with statutory certificates for medium ships, by type of issuer

Graph 132 -Total number of inspection with statutorycertificates for medium ships, by flag issuer

Graph 133 -Total number of inspection with statutorycertificates for medium ships, by recognisedorganisations


85/99


85

LARGE SHIPS

Table 140 -Total number of inspections with statutory certificates for large ships, by type of issuer

Graph 134 -Total number of inspection with statutorycertificates for large ships, by flag issuer

Graph 135 -Total number of inspection with statutorycertificates for large ships, by recognised organisations


86/99


86

VERY LARGE SHIPS

Table 141 -Total number of inspections with statutory certificates for very large ships, by type of issuer

Graph 136 -Total number of inspection with statutorycertificates for very large ships, by flag issuer

Graph 137 -Total number of inspection with statutorycertificates for very large ships, by recognisedorganisations


87/99


87

STATUTORY CERTIFICATES5.6.

Table 142 -Total number of inspections with statutory certificates for all ships, by type of certificates and issuer


88/99


89/99


89

were not members. For example thedetention rate of Intertanko ships in thelarge sship size category was 1.0%compared with 1.5% for those who arenot members (and of the targeted shiptypes as described in Annex V). It is asimilar picture for ships that are members

of Intercargo, Green Award, CDI andOCIMF.

Table 149 shows that just over a half(51.5%) of the companies included in thedata collected by Equasis operate just oneship. Over 84% operate five or fewer,although these companies account for30.5% of the fleet over 500GT by number.

Graph 139 reveals that ships operated bylarger companies had a much lowerdetention rate than those operated bysmaller companies. For ships in companieswith more than 100 ships the detentionrate is below 2.5% while one-ship andtwo-ship companies had rates of 7.26%and 5.61% respectively.


90/99


90

SCHEME STATUS6.1.

Table 143 -Total number of ships, by size and vetting programmes and trade associations

Source:Equasis (1) 500GT


91/99


91


WHOLE FLEET GT500

Table 145 -Safety performance of ships, by inspections and detentions rates(*)

Source:Equasis - (*)Detentions in Paris MoU, Tokyo MoU, IO MoU and USCG divided by total number of inspections

MEDIUM SHIPS

Table 146 -Safety performance of medium(1)ships, by inspections and detentions rates(*)



92/99


93/99


93

COMPANY PERFORMANCE6.3.

Table 149 -Total number of companies and ships, by fleet size and flag

Source:Equasis - (1) Ships GT500 - (2)Within the same company fleet size category

Graph 138 -Total number of companies and ships GT500, bycompany fleet size


94/99


94

Table 150 -Total number of inspections and detention rates(*), by company fleet size

Source:Equasis - (1)Within the same company fleet size category - (*) Detentions in Paris MoU, Tokyo MoU , IO MoU and USCG divided by total numberof inspections

Graph 139 -Total number of inspections and detention rate, by company fleet size


95/99

Equasis Statistics The world merchant fleet in 2012

95

AnnexesAnnex I. Ship type aggregations

The 13thcategory Other is not considered in the scope of these statistics and only given

for information, it contains active ships not falling into one of the 12 main categories.

Modifications since last year are marked in bold.

General Cargo ShipsDeck Cargo ShipGeneral Cargo ShipPalletized Cargo ShipPassenger/General Cargo ShipRefrigerated Cargo Ship

Specialized Cargo ShipsBarge CarrierHeavy Load CarrierLivestock CarrierNuclear Fuel Carrier

Container ShipsContainer ShipPassenger/Container Ship

Ro-Ro Cargo ShipsContainer Ro-Ro Cargo ShipRo-Ro Cargo ShipVehicles Carrier

Bulk CarriersAggregates CarrierBulk CarrierBulk Dry Storage ShipBulk/Oil Carrier

Cement CarrierLimestone CarrierOre CarrierOre/Oil CarrierPowder CarrierRefined Sugar CarrierSelf-Discharging Bulk CarrierWood Chips Carrier

Oil and Chemical TankersChemical TankerChemical/Oil Products TankerCrude Oil TankerOil Products Tanker

Gas Tankers

CO2 TankerLNG TankerLPG Tanker

Other TankersAsphalt/Bitumen TankerBunkering TankerCaprolactam TankerEdible Oil TankerFruit Juice TankerLatex TankerMolasses TankerOil-Sludge TankerVegetable Oil TankerWater TankerWine Tanker

Passenger ShipsAccom. Offshore Supp. VesselPassenger (Cruise) ShipPassenger ShipPassenger/Landing CraftPassenger/Ro-Ro Cargo Ship

Offshore VesselsDrilling ShipFSO, Oil

Mining VesselOffshore Processing ShipOffshore Supply ShipOffshore Support VesselOffshore Tug/Supply ShipPipe Burying VesselPipe-LayerProduction Testing VesselStandby-Safety VesselSupply VesselWell-Stimulation Vessel

Service ShipsBuoy/Ligbhthouse VesselCable-LayerCrane Ship

DredgerFire-Fighting VesselHopper DredgerHospital VesselIcebreakerKelp DredgerPatrol VesselPilot VesselPollution Control VesselPower Station VesselResearch VesselSalvage ShipSearch & Rescue VesselTank-Cleaning VesselTraining ShipTrans-Shipment Vessel

Utility VesselWaste Disposal VesselWork/Repair Vessel

TugsPusher TugTug

Other (Out of the scop e)Anchor HoyCoal/Oil Mixture Tanker

CrewboatExhibition VesselFish CarrierFish Factory ShipFishing Support VesselFishing Vessel

Landing CraftLaunch (unspecif ied)

Live-Fish CarrierMooring VesselMotor HopperPearl Shells CarrierSail Training Ship

Sailing VesselSeal-CatcherTrenching Support Vessel

UnknownUrea CarrierVessel (function unknown)Whale-Catcher


96/99


96

Annex II. Targeted Flag States 2012

The list of targeted flag is based on the 2012 annual reports of the Paris MoU, the TokyoMoU and the US Coast Guards, published in 2013.

A

AlbaniaAntigua and Barbuda

B

BangladeshBelizeBolivia

C

CambodiaComorosCyprus

D

Dominica

E

Egypt

G

Georgia

H

Honduras

I

IndonesiaItaly

K

KiribatiKorea Democratic Republic

L

Lebanon

LibyaLithuania

M

MaltaMexicoMoldoviaMongolia

N

New Zealand

P

PanamaPapua New GuineaPeru

S

Sierra leoneSt Vincent and GrenadinesSt.Kitts and Nevis

TTanzaniaThailandTogoTongaTuvalu

V

Vietnam


97/99


97

Annex III.Default PSC Ship types

Ship types in red corresponds to ship types that are not in the scope of these statistics (orfor which no active ship is yet in the world fleet) but for which some PSC inspections havebeen carried out.Although similar in the layout, this Annex cannot be compared to Annex I as the intention isnot to create categories of ships, the purpose of this annex is only to attribute a PSC shiptype to ships that were not inspected.

General Cargo/MultipurposeAggregates CarrierBarge CarrierBulk Dry Storage ShipCement CarrierDeck Cargo ShipGeneral Cargo ShipLanding CraftLatex TankerLimestone CarrierNuclear Fuel CarrierPalletised Cargo ShipPassenger/Landing Craft

Refined Sugar CarrierTrenching Support Vessel

Refrigerated CargoFish CarrierFish Factory ShipFruit Juice TankerRefrigerated Cargo Ship

Heavy loadHeavy Load Carrier

ContainerContainer Ship

Ro-Ro cargoContainer Ro-Ro Cargo ShipRo-Ro Cargo Ship

Bulk CarrierBulk CarrierOre CarrierSelf-Discharging Bulk Carrier

Oil tankerAsphalt/Bitumen TankerBunkering TankerCrude Oil TankerFSO, OilOil Products TankerWater Tanker

Chemical tanker

Chemical TankerChemical/Oil Products TankerVegetable Oil Tanker

Combination carrierBulk/Oil CarrierCoal/Oil Mixture TankerOre/Oil Carrier

Gas carrierCO2 TankerLNG TankerLPG Tanker

NLS TankerMolasses Tanker

Production Testing VesselWine Tanker

High speed passenger craftNone

Passenger ShipPassenger (Cruise) ShipPassenger ShipSailing Vessel

RoRo passenger shipAccommod. Offshore Supp VesselPassenger/Ro-Ro Cargo Ship

Offshore supplyOffshore Supply ShipOffshore Support VesselOffshore Tug/Supply ShipPipe-LayerWell-Stimulation Vessel

Special purpose shipCable-LayerCrane ShipFire-Fighting VesselFishing Support VesselIcebreakerPower Station Vessel

TugPusher Tug

Tug

Other special activitiesAnchor HoyBuoy/Lighthouse VesselCaprolactam TankerCrewboatDrilling ShipEdible Oil TankerExhibition VesselHopper DredgerHospital VesselKelp DredgerLaunch (Unspecified)Mining VesselMooring Vessel

Motor HopperOffshore Processing ShipPassenger/Container ShipPassenger/General Cargo ShipPatrol VesselPearl Shells CarrierPilot VesselPipe Burying VesselPollution Control VesselPowder CarrierResearch VesselSail Training ShipSalvage ShipSeal-CatcherSearch & Rescue VesselStandby-Safety Vessel

Supply VesselTank-Cleaning VesselTraining ShipTrans-Shipment Vessel

Urea CarrierUtility VesselVessel (function unknown)Waste Disposal VesselWhale-CatcherWood Chips CarrierWork/Repair Vessel

OtherDredgerFishing VesselLive-Fish Carrier

Livestock CarrierUnknownVehicles Carrier


98/99


99/99


Annex V. Ships in the scope of Trade Association andvetting programs

In Chapter 6, various figures from trade association and vetting programs are compared toa base population of ships of a relevant ship type. This Annex gives the relevant ship typesfor each trade association and vetting programs

Intertanko

Gas Tankersand Oil & Chemical Tankers

(as described in Annex I)

Intercargo

Bulk Carriersand General Cargo Ships


Note that Intercargo deals normally with ships withdeadweight over 10,000. This need to be kept inmind when analysing figures of Medium shipsassociated with Intercargo.

Intermanager

Bulk CarriersGeneral Cargo Shipsand Oil & Chemical Tanker


Green Award

A subset of Bulk Carriers:

Aggregates Carrier

Bulk CarrierBulk Dry Storage ShipCement CarrierLimestone CarrierOre CarrierPowder CarrierRefined Sugar CarrierSelf-Discharging Bulk CarrierWood Chips Carrier

Gas Tankers :

CO2 TankerLNG TankerLPG Tanker

Oil & Chemic al Tankers:

CDI

The following Tankers:

Chemical TankerChemical/Oil Products TankerVegetable Oil Tanker

OCIMF

Gas Tankersand Oil & Chemical Tanker


Equasis Statistics - The World Fleet 2012

Documents

Transcript of Equasis Statistics - The World Fleet 2012