Environmental Safeguard Monitoring Report · 2018-09-13 · RKL Indonesian Environmental Management...

134
Environmental Safeguard Monitoring Report 2017 Annual Environmental Monitoring Report September 2018 INO: Loan 2817- Regional Road Development Project Prepared by Project Management Unit, Directorate of Road Network Development, for the Directorate General of Highways, Ministry of Public Works and Housing and the Asian Development Bank.

Transcript of Environmental Safeguard Monitoring Report · 2018-09-13 · RKL Indonesian Environmental Management...

Environmental Safeguard Monitoring Report

2017 Annual Environmental Monitoring Report September 2018

INO: Loan 2817- Regional Road Development

Project

Prepared by Project Management Unit, Directorate of Road Network Development, for the

Directorate General of Highways, Ministry of Public Works and Housing and the Asian

Development Bank.

NOTES

(i) The fiscal year (FY) of the Government of Indonesia ends on 31 December. FY before a calendar year denotes the year in which the fiscal year ends, e.g., FY2011 ends on 31 December 2011.

(ii) In this report, "$" refers to US dollars. This environmental safeguard monitoring report is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area.

REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA

MINISTRY OF PUBLIC WORKS AND HOUSING

DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF HIGHWAY

DIRECTORATE OF ROAD NETWORK DEVELOPMENT

TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE FOR SUPPORT OF

PROJECT MANAGEMENT UNIT OF REGIONAL ROADS DEVELOPMENT PROJECT

UNDER: ADB LOAN NUMBER 2817-INO AND IDB FINANCING NUMBER IND-0161

2017 ANNUAL ENVIRONMENTAL

MONITORING REPORT

Joint venture between:

RENARDET S.A. CONSULTING ENGINEERS

In association with

PT. Multi Phi Beta

PT. Widya Graha Asana

PT. Disiplan Consult

PT. Anugerah Kridapradana

2017 Annual Environmental Monitoring Report (AEMR)

Regional Roads Development Project (RRDP)

i

ABBREVIATIONS

ADB Asian Development Bank

AMDAL Indonesian Environmental Impact Assessment (Analisis Mengenai Dampak

Lingkungan Hidup)

ANDAL Indonesian Environmental Impact Statement (Analisis Dampak Lingkungan

Hidup)

BLHD Regional Environmental Agency (Badan Lingkungan Hidup Daerah)

CTC Core Team Consultant

DSC Design and Supervision Consultant

DGH Directorate General of Highway (Direktorat Jenderal Bina Marga)

Dinas PU Provincial Public Works Agency (Dinas Pekerjaan Umum Provinsi)

EMP Environmental Management Plan

EMMP Environmental Management and Monitoring Plan (the checklist issued by DGH

as part of the contract specification)

GOI Government of Indonesia

GRM Grievance Redress Mechanism

IEE Initial Environmental Examination

MPWH Ministry of Public Works and Housing

PIU Project Implementation Unit

PMU Project Management Unit headed by the Director of Road Networks

Development Directorate

RKL Indonesian Environmental Management Plan (Rencana Pengelolaan

Lingkungan)

RPL Indonesian Environmental Monitoring Plan (Rencana Pemantauan Lingkungan)

RRDP Regional Roads Development Project

SDERS Sub-Directorate of Environmental Affairs and Road Safety

SPPL Statement letter to commit conducting environmental management and

monitoring (Surat Pernyataan Kesanggupan Pengelolaan dan Pemantauan

Lingkungan Hidup)

UKL-UPL Indonesian Environmental Management Effort and Environmental Monitoring

Effort Document (Upaya Pengelolaan Lingkungan - Upaya Pemantauan

Lingkungan)

2017 Annual Environmental Monitoring Report (AEMR)

Regional Roads Development Project (RRDP)

ii

TABLE OF CONTENTS

TABLE OF CONTENTS ..................................................................................................... II

TABLES ………………………………………………………………………………………..III FIGURES ………………………………………………………………………………………..III APPENDICES .................................................................................................................... III

PART I. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................... 4

1.1. Project Background ................................................................................................. 4

1.2. Objectives and Scope of the Monitoring Report ..................................................... 4

PART II. ROAD CONSTRUCTION PROGRESS IN 2017 .............................................. 6

PART III. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN .................................................. 10

3.1. Roles and Responsibilities .................................................................................... 10

3.2. EMP Implementation by Executing Agencies ....................................................... 14

3.3. EMP Implementation by DSC ............................................................................... 15

3.4. EMP Implementation by Contractors .................................................................... 17

3.5. Public Consultations and Grievance Redress Mechanism .................................. 18

PART IV. ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING ................................................................ 19

4.1. Environmental Approval and Permit for Road Construction ................................ 19

4.2. Environmental Approval and Permit for AMP and Quarry/Borrow Pit ................. 19

4.3. Monitoring Results ................................................................................................ 20

4.3.1. Ambient Air Quality………………………………………………………………..21

4.3.2. Noise Monitoring Data…………………………………………………………….24

4.4. Environmental Monitoring by the DSC ................................................................. 28

PART V. ADB REVIEW MISSION AND CTC SITE INSPECTION ............................... 34

PART VI. KEY ISSUES FOR RESOLUTION ................................................................. 47

PART VII. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ............................................. 48

2017 Annual Environmental Monitoring Report (AEMR)

Regional Roads Development Project (RRDP)

iii

TABLES

Table 1: Ongoing Construction Work Packages (as of December 2017) ........................................ 9

Table 2: EMP Implementation by the DGH, SDERS, PMU, and CTC .......................................... 14

Table 3: EMP Implementation by the DSC ................................................................................... 16

Table 4: Contractor‟s EHS Personnel for Ongoing Projects .......................................................... 17

Table 5: Environmental Approval and Permit of Road Sections as of 2017 .................................. 19

Table 6: Environmental Approval and Permit for AMP and Quarry/Borrow Pit as of 2017 ............ 20

Table 7: Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Results for Central Java Packages ................................ 21

Table 8: Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Results for West Kalimantan Packages ......................... 22

Table 9: Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Results for North Kalimantan Packages ........................ 23

Table 10: Noise Level Measurements for Central Java CW Packages ......................................... 24

Table 11: Noise Level Measurements for CW Packages in West Kalimantan .............................. 25

Table 12: Noise Level Measurements for CW Packages in North Kalimantan ............................. 26

Table 13: Environmental Monitoring Undertaken by DSC............................................................. 29

Table 14: Non-Compliance/Issue Identified, Corrective Action and Its Status as of 2017 ............ 35

Table 15 : Key Issues and Required Corrective Actions ............................................................... 47

FIGURES

Figure 1: Construction Work Packages in Central Java .................................................................. 6

Figure 2: Construction Work Packages in East Java ...................................................................... 7

Figure 3: Construction Work Packages in West Kalimantan (CW-06 and CW-07) ......................... 7

Figure 4: Construction Work Packages in West Kalimantan (CW-05) ............................................ 8

Figure 5: Construction Work Packages in North Kalimantan .......................................................... 8

Figure 6: RRDP Organizational Structure – National Government Level ...................................... 11

Figure 7: RRDP Organizational Structure – West Kalimantan ...................................................... 12

Figure 8: RRDP Organizational Structure – North Kalimantan ..................................................... 12

Figure 9: RRDP Organizational Structure – Central Java ............................................................. 13

Figure 10: Grievance Redress Mechanism ................................................................................... 18

APPENDICES

Appendix A Implementation of Environmental Mitigating Measures – Construction Phase

Appendix B AMDAL/UKL-UPL Approvals and Environmental Permits

Appendix C Air Quality and Noise Monitoring Results

Appendix D Site Closure Reports and Related Documents

2017 Annual Environmental Monitoring Report (AEMR)

Regional Roads Development Project (RRDP)

4

PART I. INTRODUCTION

1.1. Project Background

1. The Regional Roads Development Project (RRDP) is financed through a Project Loan

from the Asian Development Bank (ADB) and the Islamic Development Bank (IDB). The

executing agency of the RRDP is the Directorate General of Highways (DGH), known as

Direktorat Jenderal Bina Marga (Ditjen Bina Marga) of the Ministry of Public Works and

Housing (MPWH) also known as Kementerian Pekerjaan Umum dan Perumahan Rakyat.

The public works and public housing sectors were merged and became MPWH since

October 2014.

2. The RRDP aims to improve important national and strategic road corridors in Northern

Kalimantan and Southern Java to encourage economic growth in these two (2) less

developed areas of Indonesia. The rehabilitation, capacity expansion and construction of

new roads will improve connectivity and access to services in the above-mentioned

provinces. Improved road infrastructure in southern Java is necessary for increased

economic growth to increase access to markets and attract investment in that area. Road

network development in Kalimantan will promote economic and regional development in

currently less developed and remote areas. Further, it will improve access of poor rural

and minority villages to income generating opportunities and social services, particularly in

North Kalimantan.

3. The RRDP consists of eleven (11) construction work (CW) packages/sub-projects,

including rehabilitation, improvement or construction about 476 km of roads and bridges

distributed in four (4) provinces of Indonesia, namely West Kalimantan, North Kalimantan,

Central Java, and East Java. Further, the works include rehabilitation or replacement of

bridges equal to approximately 3.9-km long and construction of 40.0-km long of new

roads along agricultural areas where there are existing earthen tracks in some sections.

4. Most of the civil works under the RRDP will include widening and partial

reconstruction of the existing road of more than 400-km long to a minimum width of 6 m

with some minor deviations. All subproject roads are designed as two-lane two-way roads,

which consist of 6-m carriage ways plus 2 x 1-m hard shoulder and 2 x 1-m side ditch.

New alignment will also be constructed along existing tracks and/or delineated areas.

Rehabilitation, asphalt pavement, and widening works will be undertaken on existing

substandard 2-lane gravel or asphalt roads which are strategic to meet the national

highway standards.

1.2. Objectives and Scope of the Monitoring Report

5. The main objectives of this Annual Environmental Monitoring Report (AEMR) are to

briefly present the progress of RRDP in 2017 and analyze environmental mitigation and

monitoring activities implemented in this period. Further, the status of corrective actions

undertaken in response to non-compliances identified by ADB Review Mission and CTC

site inspections in 2017 is updated in this report, including report on community

complaints and Grievance Redress Mechanism (GRM) conducted, if any.

6. This 2017 AEMR is prepared based on data and information that are extracted and

2017 Annual Environmental Monitoring Report (AEMR)

Regional Roads Development Project (RRDP)

5

analyzed, as available, from: Design and Supervision Consultant (DSC) Monthly

Environmental Reports for the mentioned period; corresponding Core Team Consultant

(CTC) Environmental Specialist Site Visit Reports; ADB Memorandum of Understandings

of the Project Review Missions in 2017; and correspondences and verbal communication

among the contractors, DSC, and CTC. In particular, the environmental mitigation and

monitoring described in this AEMR are based on available evidence and assessed

against each aspect detailed in the EMP of IEE (approved 2011), which is the key

environmental document for the RRDP. The Core Team Consultants (CTC), comprising

Renardet S.A. Consulting Engineers in association with PT. Multi Phi Beta, PT. Widya

Graha Asana, PT. Disiplan Consult, and PT. Anugerah Kridapradana, have prepared this

2017 AEMR.

7. The contents presented in the 2017 AEMR include:

­ Part I Introduction

­ Part II Work progress in 2017

­ Part III Environmental mitigation measures

­ Part IV Environmental monitoring

­ Part V ADB review mission and CTC site inspection

­ Part VI Key issues and corrective actions

­ Part VIII Conclusions.

2017 Annual Environmental Monitoring Report (AEMR)

Regional Roads Development Project (RRDP)

6

PART II. ROAD CONSTRUCTION PROGRESS IN 2017

8. As of December 2017, the construction of seven CW packages have been completed

and the details are presented in Figures 1 to 5. Based on this, a total of 284.56-km of

roads (out of 476 km planned) and 438-m bridges (out of 3.9 km planned) have been

constructed or rehabilitated up to the end of 2017, including:

Central Java

CW-02 Giriwoyo - Duwet (Section-1) completed on December 27, 2017

CW-03 Wawar - Congot completed on August 12, 2016

East Java

CW-04 Jolosutro – Sendangbiru completed on April 9, 2016

West Kalimantan

CW-06 covering: Tebas - Singkawang Section 1 (previously Singkawang overlay); Tebas - Singkawang Section 2; Sambas Bypass, Galing - Tanjung Harapan; and Sambas – Tanjung Harapan completed on December 19, 2017

CW-07 covering Simpang Tanjung – Galing and Aruk (Batas Sarawak) - Simpang Tanjung completed on September 28, 2017

North Kalimantan

CW-09 Tanjung Palas - Sekatak Buji (Section 2) completed on March 1, 2017

CW-10 Apas - Simanggaris (Section 1) completed on March 25, 2017.

The construction of CW-01 (Central Java), CW-05 (West Kalimantan), CW-08 and CW-11

(North Kalimantan) remains underway and its respective progress is presented in Table 1.

Figure 1: Construction Work Packages in Central Java

2017 Annual Environmental Monitoring Report (AEMR)

Regional Roads Development Project (RRDP)

7

Figure 2: Construction Work Packages in East Java

Figure 3: Construction Work Packages in West Kalimantan (CW-06 and CW-07)

2017 Annual Environmental Monitoring Report (AEMR)

Regional Roads Development Project (RRDP)

8

Figure 4: Construction Work Packages in West Kalimantan (CW-05)

Figure 5: Construction Work Packages in North Kalimantan

2017 Annual Environmental Monitoring Report (AEMR)

Regional Roads Development Project (RRDP)

9

Table 1: Ongoing Construction Work Packages (as of December 2017)

Package

No. Road Section

Total Length

(km) Contractor Activities and Progress as of Dec 2017

Central Java

CW-01 Tambak Mulyo – Wawar 38.46 Joint operation of PT Pembangunan

Perumahan (Persero) and PT Armada

Hada Graha

Project progress: 74.915% covering:

­ grade preparation and embankment,

­ side ditch and cross drain works,

­ spreading of cement treated base (CTB) and asphalt

cement-base course (AC-BC),

­ pouring of concrete for box culvert,

­ stone masonry for retaining wall.

West Kalimantan

CW-05

Sosok – Tayan 41.60 Joint operation of PT Yasa Patria

Perkasa and PT Budi Bakti Prima

Project progress: 69.043% covering:

­ embankment and granular

­ side ditch and cross drain works

­ spreading of aggregate A and AC-BC

­ pouring of concrete for retaining wall & box culvert

­ stone masonry for retaining wall.

Tanjung - Batas Kota Sanggau 37.60

Aruk (Batas Sarawak) -Simpang

Tanjung

11.13

North Kalimantan (This area was part of East Kalimantan Province prior to 2013)

CW-08

Tanjung Selor - Simpang Tiga

Tanjung Palas, and Simpang Tiga

Tanjung Palas - Sekatak Buji

(Section 1)

34.82 PT Waskita Karya Project progress: 98.980 % covering:

­ spreading of aggregate class S,

­ installation of road signs and road markings,

­ foundation works,

­ driving of bore pile and reinforcing steel for pile cap,

­ pouring of concrete for retaining wall.

CW-11

Simpang Tiga Apas -Simanggaris

(Section-2)

27.15 Halla Corporation Project progress: 83.038 % covering:

­ excavation and embankment,

­ spreading of CTB and Aggregate (class S),

­ spreading of Asphalt Cement-Wearing Course (AC-

WC) and AC-BC,

­ pouring of concrete for sidewalk and railing works,

­ stone masonry for retaining wall.

Simanggaris – Border (Batas

Negara, Serudong)

20.80

2017 Annual Environmental Monitoring Report (AEMR)

Regional Roads Development Project (RRDP)

10

PART III. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN

3.1. Roles and Responsibilities

9. There were no changes to the executing agency, contractors and consultants of

RRDP as of December 2017. The DGH is the executing agency responsible for the

overall RRDP implementation. The DGH has established the Project Management Unit

(PMU) headed by the Director of the Directorate Road Networks Development. Its

function is to facilitate land acquisition, resettlement, and environmental mitigation. An

Officer in Charge has been designated for the PMU to oversee day-to-day activities and

prepare progress reports. The PMU is assisted by the Core Team Consultant (CTC). The

PMU in coordination with the Project Implementation Unit (PIU) and Sub-directorate for

Environmental and Road Safety (SDERS) of the Directorate Road Networks

Development ensures that the environmental management (mitigation and monitoring)

plan (EMP) is implemented. The Design and Supervision Consultants (DSCs) are

required to conduct monitoring of the EMP implemented by the Contractors and submit

the corresponding monthly environmental report to the DGH/PMU and CTC. Figure 6

presents the RRDP organization structure at the national level.

10. Figure 7 to 9 present the RRDP organization structure in West and North Kalimantan

as well as in Central Java. The RRDP implementation in East Java was completed in

2016 and therefore no longer described in the 2017 AEMR. During the construction

stage, the Contractors, under the supervision of the DSCs, are primarily responsible for

EMP implementation of their respective CW packages. The DSCs appointed for the

RRDP are:

DSC-1: China Engineering Consultants, Inc., for the CW packages (CW-04 to CW-11)

in West and North Kalimantan; and

DSC-2: Botek Bosphorus Technical Consulting Corp., for the CW packages (CW-01

to CW-03) in Central Java.

11. The DSCs should prepare and submit the monthly environmental reports to the

DGH/PMU and CTC. The CTC appointed for the RRDP is Renardet S.A. and its joint

venture partners. Based on the monthly environmental reports submitted by the DSCs,

the PMU/DGH with the assistance of the CTC prepares the Semi-Annual/Annual

Environmental Monitoring Report (SAEMR/AEMR) for review and disclosure at ADB‟s website.

2017 Annual Environmental Monitoring Report (AEMR)

Regional Roads Development Project (RRDP)

11

Figure 6: RRDP Organizational Structure – National Government Level

2017 Annual Environmental Monitoring Report (AEMR)

Regional Roads Development Project (RRDP)

12

Figure 7: RRDP Organizational Structure – West Kalimantan

Figure 8: RRDP Organizational Structure – North Kalimantan

2017 Annual Environmental Monitoring Report (AEMR)

Regional Roads Development Project (RRDP)

13

Figure 9: RRDP Organizational Structure – Central Java

2017 Annual Environmental Monitoring Report (AEMR)

Regional Roads Development Project (RRDP)

14

3.2. EMP Implementation by Executing Agencies

12. The EMP of RRDP implemented by the DGH, SDERS, PMU, and CTC is reported in

Table 2. The category used to report the implementation status of the EMP is as follows:

“Implemented” meaning that the agencies have primarily performed and/or

accomplished their EMP responsibilities.

“In progress” meaning that the agencies have put some or partial efforts to implement

the EMP responsibilities and in some cases in an informal manner (without

documentation).

“Not implemented” meaning that the agencies have not implemented the EMP

responsibilities.

“Not applicable” meaning that the EMP responsibility of the agencies is no longer

relevant due to changes in their mandates or the project is already in the different

phases.

Brief justifications are also described for each of the status assigned in the table below.

Table 2: EMP Implementation by the DGH, SDERS, PMU, and CTC

Agency / Roles and Responsibilities Status as of Dec 2017

Directorate General of Highways (DGH) as the Executing Agency/Project Director

Direct and supervise the Project Management

Unit (PMU)

In progress – direction and supervision were conducted on

ad hoc basis, and therefore documentation with this regard

was rarely produced.

Ensure that sufficient funds are available to

properly implement EMP.

Implemented - the cost of implementing the EMP is included

in the unit price of all pay items included in the contract and

deemed as full compensation for environmental management

of RRDP.

Ensure that EMP provisions are implemented

for the entire Project regardless of financing

resources.

Implemented - EMP provisions are integral part of the

General Specifications of the contracts awarded to RRDP

contractors.

Ensure that Project implementation complies

with the GOI and ADB‟s environmental policy

principles and requirements.

Implemented – implementation with these regards are

reported in the form of checklist and monthly report by

contractors and DSCs.

Ensure that tender and contract documents

include the EMP.

Implemented – EMP is included as part of the specification of

the contract document signed by the Contractors.

Establish a grievance redress mechanism

(GRM) as described in the IEE

Implemented – GRM is established as part of the RRDP

(described elsewhere in this report).

Submit semi-annual monitoring reports

(SAEMR) on EMP implementation to ADB.

Implemented – semi-annual environmental monitoring

reports and annual environmental monitoring reports were

submitted to ADB.

Sub-directorate of Environmental and Road Safety (SDERS) responsible for environmental and social

monitoring

Set procedures for environmental management

and monitoring based on GOI and ADB

requirements.

In progress – these procedures were established by requiring

the road construction works, asphalt mixing plant and quarry

operations to be secured with ANDAL and RKL-RPL

approvals, UKL-UPL approval, and Environmental Permit as

required by prevailing Indonesian laws and regulations.

2017 Annual Environmental Monitoring Report (AEMR)

Regional Roads Development Project (RRDP)

15

Agency / Roles and Responsibilities Status as of Dec 2017

Coordinate with PMU to ensure that the EMP is

implemented properly and that required

monitoring and reporting are undertaken as

required.

In progress – coordination was conducted on ad hoc basis,

and therefore documentation with this regard was scarcely

produced.

Coordinate with BLHD offices at the District,

City, and Provincial Levels with regard to

compliance of the Project to GOI

environmental requirements.

In progress – coordination between SDERS and

local/provincial environmental agencies were undertaken on

ad hoc basis in relation to UKL-UPL approval and

Environmental Permit related to some road sections of RRDP

projects, and therefore documentation with this regard was

scarcely produced.

Project Management Unit (PMU) provides day-to-day project management of RRDP

Include the EMP in tender and contract

documents.

Implemented - through the inclusion of Section 1.17

Environmental Safeguards in the RRDP Contract General

Specifications.

Ensure that EMP provisions are strictly

implemented during various project phases.

In progress – this implementation is through regular site visits

to each CW packages and site coordination with PPK, Satker

(working unit), and contractor concerned to environmental

mitigation, but this has been implemented to varying degree

and this event was scarcely documented.

Undertake monitoring of the implementation of

the EMMP (mitigation and monitoring

measures) with assistance from DSC.

Implemented - through site inspections undertaken by PMU.

Ensure that DSC prepared monthly reports,

environmental monitoring reports for

submission to PMU/CTC.

Implemented - through DSC Monthly Environmental

Monitoring Report submission to PMU.

With support from CTC, prepare semi-annual

environmental monitoring reports for

submission to ADB.

Implemented - semi-annual and annual environmental

monitoring reports were submitted to ADB.

Core Team Consultants (CTC) provides project management support to PMU

Prepare semi-annual reports on EMP

implementation (mitigation measures,

establishment of ambient baseline data

baseline, ambient monitoring, etc.) based on

the monthly monitoring reports submitted by

DSC.

The semi-annual environmental monitoring

reports shall be submitted to ADB through

DGH/PMU.

Implemented - semi-annual and annual environmental

monitoring reports were submitted to ADB via DGH/PMU.

Develop an environmental auditing protocol for

the construction period for DSC‟s guidance. Implemented – through the use of EMMP as environmental

auditing instrument for the construction period.

3.3. EMP Implementation by DSC

13. Table 3 presents the status of the DSCs on their responsibility in implementing the

EMP. The criteria used to determine the implementation status of the EMP are the same

as those used in Table 2. For this report and the succeeding environmental monitoring

reports, the status for DSC-3 is not presented since it has already been demobilized in

May 9, 2016 after the lone CW package under its supervision, CW-04, finished

2017 Annual Environmental Monitoring Report (AEMR)

Regional Roads Development Project (RRDP)

16

construction activities in 2016.

14. DSC-1 and DSC-2 have mobilized their respective EHS engineer in September 2017.

Some EMP implementation status are already “in progress” and it is expected that there will be improvement in environmental monitoring and compliance to the provisions of the

EMP following this personnel mobilization.

Table 3: EMP Implementation by the DSC

Responsibilities DSC – 1: China Engineering Consultants Inc. (West and

North Kalimantan)

DSC – 2: Botek Bosphorus Consulting

(Central Java)

Undertake regular monitoring of the

contractor‟s implementation of the environmental mitigation measures

specified in the EMP

Implemented - the EHS engineer

conducts monitoring since late

2017.

Implemented - the EHS

engineer conducts

monitoring since late 2017.

Prepare monthly environmental

monitoring reports for submission to

DGH/PMU and CTC. Such reports

shall be the basis for the semi-

annual environmental monitoring

reports to be prepared by CTC for

submission to ADB.

In progress – the monthly

environmental monitoring reports

were submitted by DSC to

PMU/CTC in the form of checklist

without adequate supporting

documents.

In progress – the

observation of DSC-2 with

this regard is the same as

that of DSC-1.

Engage an accredited/licensed

laboratory or institution to undertake

establishment of baseline data on air

quality, noise, and surface water

quality prior to commencement of

site works based on the EMMP.

Prepare corresponding reports for

submission to DGH/PMU and CTC.

Not applicable – since the project

was already in construction phase

in 2016, and therefore

environmental baseline data was

no longer required.

Not applicable – the

observation of DSC-2 with

this regard is the same as

that of DSC-1.

Engage an accredited/licensed

laboratory or institution to conduct

sampling during construction phase

and in response to complaints or

when there are pollution events.

Prepare corresponding reports for

submission to DGH/PMU and CTC.

In progress – CW-11 did not

conduct air quality and noise

monitoring in July-December

2017. During this Semester CW-

05, CW-06 and CW-08

implemented air quality and noise

monitoring

Implemented - air quality

and noise monitoring were

conducted by CW-01 and

CW-02, and the results

were presented in this

report.

Not applicable for CW-03

which was completed in

2016.

Review and approve the specific

environmental management plans

(Dust Suppression Program,

Sewage Management Plan, Solid

Waste Management Plan) to be

prepared by the contractors as

specified in the EMP

Not implemented - no specific

management plans as required

has been prepared by the

contractors.

Not implemented - the

observation of DSC-2 with

this regard is the same as

that of DSC-1.

Provide on-the-job training to PU

Office, P2JN staff, provincial and

district DGH staff as well as to

province and district environmental

staff on monitoring of contractor's

Not implemented – no evidence

that this activity has been

undertaken.

Not implemented - the

observation of DSC-2 with

this regard is the same as

that of DSC-1.

2017 Annual Environmental Monitoring Report (AEMR)

Regional Roads Development Project (RRDP)

17

Responsibilities DSC – 1: China Engineering Consultants Inc. (West and

North Kalimantan)

DSC – 2: Botek Bosphorus Consulting

(Central Java)

environmental performance and

preparation of monitoring reports

Supervise civil works to ensure

compliance with the EMP

In progress - the EHS engineer of

DSC conducts monitoring since

September 2017.

In progress – the

observation of DSC-2 with

this regard is the same as

that of DSC-1.

Recruit an EHS manager who will be

responsible in ensuring that

environmental mitigation measures

specified in the EMP are

implemented properly

Implemented - the EHS engineer,

instead of Manager, of DSC was

recruited and mobilized to project

sites in September 2017.

Implemented - the

observation of DSC-2 with

this regard is the same as

that of DSC-1.

Implement and provide sufficient

funding and human resources for

proper and timely implementation of

required mitigation measures in the

EMP

In progress - funding and human

resources were provided for EMP

implementation, but this was

inadequate as mitigation

measures were partly

implemented.

In progress - the

observation of DSC-2 with

this regard is the same as

that of DSC-1.

Review and approve environmental

assessment reports required by the

Government.

Not applicable – the

environmental assessment

reports required for the project

were handled by the proponent

and SDERS.

Not applicable – the

environmental assessment

reports required for the

project were handled by the

proponent and SDERS.

Undertake monitoring of the project‟s environmental performance based

on their mandate

Implemented – the EHS specialist

monitored the project

environmental performance and

reported in the DSC‟s monthly report submitted to PMU/CTC.

Implemented - the

observation of DSC-2 with

this regard is the same as

that of DSC-1.

3.4. EMP Implementation by Contractors

15. Table 4 presents the EHS personnel of the remaining Contractors for the RRDP

ongoing projects. These contractors are responsible for the EMP implementation of the

the road construction, AMP and quarry operations.

Table 4: Contractor’s EHS Personnel for Ongoing Projects

Package / Road Section (Contractor) EHS Personnel

Central Java

CW-01: Tambak Mulyo – Wawar

(PT Pembangunan Perumahan & PT Armada Hada Graha)

Muhammad Iso

West Kalimantan

CW-05: Sosok – Tayan; and Tanjung – Batas Kota

(PT Yasa Patria Perkasa & PT Budi Bakti Prima)

Juliusman Laia

North Kalimantan

CW-08: Tanjung Selor - Intersection Tiga Tanjung Palas; Intersection Dhika Fatkhur Rakhman,

2017 Annual Environmental Monitoring Report (AEMR)

Regional Roads Development Project (RRDP)

18

Package / Road Section (Contractor) EHS Personnel

Tiga Tanjung Palas - Sekatak Buji (Section 1) (PT Waskita Karya) Fahrial

CW-11: Intersection Tiga Apas - Simanggaris (Section 2); and

Simanggaris – Batas Negara (Serudong) - (Halla Corporation)

Sugiyana

3.5. Public Consultations and Grievance Redress Mechanism

16. No public consultations were conducted and also no public complaints formally

reported with regard to RRDP implementation in 2017. Nevertheless, the Grievance

Redress Mechanism (GRM) has been established as per the figure below to address

public complaints or concerns related to the project, if any.

Figure 10: Grievance Redress Mechanism

2017 Annual Environmental Monitoring Report (AEMR)

Regional Roads Development Project (RRDP)

19

PART IV. ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING

4.1. Environmental Approval and Permit for Road Construction

17. As of the end of 2017, the AMDAL and UKL-UPL approval and the Environmental

Permit remain incomplete for parts of the road construction of CW-06 as presented in

Table 5, whereas the road construction of this package has been completed in December

2017.

18. In the following table, the Executing Agency confirms that the environmental

approvals of CW-04 road construction are complete.

Table 5: Environmental Approval and Permit of Road Sections as of 2017

Package / Road Section Status

CW-04 in East Java

Jolosutro - Kedungsalam, UKL/UPL Approval No. P2T/I/17.02/II/2011 (dated 2 February

2011) granted by the Head of Investment Board of East Java

Province.

Kedungsalam - Balekambang

Balekambang - Tumpakrejo

Tumpakrejo – Bajumati AMDAL approval No. 660/1729/203.2.1/2003 (dated

September 2003) granted by Bappedal of East Java Province Bajumati – Sendang Biru

CW-06 in West Kalimantan

Tebas - Singkawang Section 1

(previously Singkawang overlay)

Length: 3.60 km

AMDAL approval No. 154/BLHD/2013 (dated 18 February

2013) granted by the Governor of West Kalimantan.

However, there is no record indicating whether the

corresponding Environmental Permit has been granted. Tebas - Singkawang (Section 2)

Length: 26.20 km

Sambas Bypass

Length: 6.10 km

There is no record indicating whether the UKL-UPL approval

and Environmental Permit for this road section exist.

Sambas – Tanjung Harapan

Length: 12.3 km

AMDAL approval No. 64.a/BLH/2015 (dated 15 December

2015) granted by BLHD Sambas Regency; and

Environmental Permit No. 918/BLH/2015 (dated 21 December

2015) granted by Bupati Sambas Regency;

Galing - Tanjung Harapan

Length: 20.07 km

UKL-UPL approval No. 660.1/42/BLH-A (dated 16 February

2011) granted by BLHD of Sambas Regency.

4.2. Environmental Approval and Permit for AMP and Quarry/Borrow Pit

19. The asphalt mixing plants (AMP) and quarries/borrow pits owned/managed by the

RRDP contractors are required to secure UKL-UPL approval and Environmental Permit

from respective local environmental agency and/or local government. The status of these

approvals and permits is presented in Table 6. 6 out of 9 ongoing RRDP CW packages

have secured UKL-UPL approval and Environmental Permit or Environmental

Management and Monitoring Statement Letter (Surat Pernyataan Kesanggupan

Pengelolaan dan Pemantauan Lingkungan Hidup known as SPPL). Some of these

approvals and permits are presented in Appendix B.

2017 Annual Environmental Monitoring Report (AEMR)

Regional Roads Development Project (RRDP)

20

20. However, there are no evidences whether environmental approval and permit of the

remaining CW packages i.e. CW-03 (Central Java) and CW-04 (East Java) have been

secured whilst the respective construction works already completed.

Table 6: Environmental Approval and Permit for AMP and Quarry/Borrow Pit as of 2017

CW Package/Road Section Status

Asphalt Mixing Plant Quarry/Borrow Pit

Central Java UKL-UPL

approval Environmental

Permit

UKL-UPL

approval Environmental

Permit

CW-01: Tambak Mulyo – Wawar Secured Secured Secured None

CW-02: Giriwoyo - Duwet Secured Secured Secured Secured

CW-03: Wawar – Congot

(completed as of Dec. 2017)

Secured None None None

East Java

CW-04: Jolosutro – Sendang Biru

(completed as of Dec. 2017)

None None None None

West Kalimantan

CW-05: Sosok – Tayan; Tanjung –

Batas Kota Sanggau

Secured Secured Secured Secured

CW-06: Tebas – Singkawang

(Sections 1 and 2); Sambas bypass;

Sambas – Tanjung Harapan; Galing

– Tanjung Harapan

Secured Secured Secured Secured

CW-07: Intersection Tanjung –

Galing; Aruk – Intersection Tanjung

Secured Secured Secured Secured

North Kalimantan

CW-08: Tanjung Selor – Intersection

Tiga Tanjung Palas – Sekatak Buji

(Section 1)

Secured Secured Secured Secured

CW-09: Intersection Tiga Tanjung

Palas – Sekatak Buji (Section 2)

(completed as of Dec. 2017)

None None None None

CW-10: Intersection Tiga Apas –

Simanggaris (Sections 1 and 2)

(completed as of Dec. 2017)

None None None None

CW-11: Simanggaris – Batas

Negara (Serudong)

SPPL (instead of UKL-UPL and

Environmental Permit) secured

Not applicable as the quarry

material is purchased from

elsewhere

4.3. Monitoring Results

21. There were nine CW packages ongoing in 2017 required to conduct an annual

ambient air quality and semi-annual noise level monitoring. However, only six CW

packages conducted this monitoring, but the parameters analyzed are partial. The results

of this monitoring are described in the following paragraphs.

2017 Annual Environmental Monitoring Report (AEMR)

Regional Roads Development Project (RRDP)

21

22. There were no complaints on water pollution reported in 2017, and therefore no water

quality sampling is required according to the IEE of RRDP (2011).

4.3.1. Ambient Air Quality

23. The ambient air quality monitoring results and corresponding interpretation for the

ongoing CW packages in Central Java, West Kalimantan and North Kalimantan (for 2017)

are described in the following paragraphs. The Government Regulation No. 41 of 1999

(GR 41/1999) on Air Pollution Control stipulates threshold values of selected air pollutant

parameters which are used as the reference for interpreting the analytical results

presented herein. Unfortunately, there are no maps indicating the air quality sampling

locations are presented by the contractor and/or the laboratory.

24. Central Java. One-hour sampling of ambient air quality was conducted at CW-01 and

CW-02 road alignments, and the samples were analyzed for total suspended particulates

(TSP), but not for particulate matter (PM10) as required by the IEE of RRDP. The GR

41/1999 stipulates the threshold value of TSP for 24-hour sampling is 230 µg/Nm3, but it

does not stipulate that for the 1-hour sampling. Therefore, the analytical results presented

in Table 7 only provide a brief condition of the TSP concentration at a particular location

within the road alignment.

25. For CW-01, the TSP concentration of <3.16 µg/Nm3 was less than the detection limit

stated in the laboratory analysis report. The TSP concentration of CW-02 was highest at

the Intersection Pracimantoro at 118 µg/Nm3 and lowest at the STA 0+00 (at the front of

Giriwoyo Market) at 39 µg/Nm3. The existing weather condition during the time of the

sampling was reportedly wet and not too many vehicles were passing through the area.

Overall, the TSP concentrations measured for 1-hour sampling at these sampling points

are well below the threshold value stipulated in GR 41/1999.

Table 7: Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Results for Central Java Packages

No Road Section / Sampling Point (Sampling Date) TSP (µg/Nm3)1

CW-01: Tambak Mulyo – Wawar

1 Within the road alignment (12 Oct 2017) <3.16

CW-02: Giriwoyo - Duwet

1 Intersection Pracimantoro (20 Mar 2017) 90

2 Sta 0+00 At the front of Giriwoyo Market (27 Sep 2017) 39

3 Intersection Giribelah (27 Sep 2017) 54

4 Intersection Pracimantoro (27 Sep 2017) 118

5 STA 23+700 (27 Sep 2017) 53

Note: 1No threshold concentration of TSP stipulated for 1-hour sampling in GR 41/1999.

26. West Kalimantan. In 2017, all CW packages in West Kalimantan, namely CW-05,

CW-06 and CW-07 conducted ambient air quality sampling for TSP, but only CW-05

2017 Annual Environmental Monitoring Report (AEMR)

Regional Roads Development Project (RRDP)

22

conducted air quality sampling for PM10. It was not specified in the analytical results

whether this sampling was conducted for 1-hour or 24-hour period. The corresponding

analytical results are presented in Table 8.

27. At CW-05, the TSP and PM10 concentrations measured at three locations in 2017

were below the threshold value of 230 µg/Nm3 and 150 µg/Nm3, for TSP and PM10

respectively, except at the Bunut Base Camp (its security post), where the contractor‟s AMP and stone crusher is located, in which the measured TSP and PM10 concentrations

were 314 µg/Nm3 and 178 µg/Nm3 respectively. These high concentrations should be

addressed by the contractor through the water sprinkling of source aggregates prior to

and as it fed into the stone crusher.

28. The TSP concentrations of the two locations sampled within CW-06 road alignment in

March and December 2017 were well below the TSP threshold value of 230 µg/Nm3.

29. The TSP concentrations of the two unnamed locations within CW-07 road alignment

in August 2017 were well below the TSP threshold value of 230 µg/Nm3.

Table 8: Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Results for West Kalimantan Packages

No Road Section / Sampling Point (Sampling Date) PM10 (µg/Nm3) TSP (µg/Nm

3)

CW-05: Sosok – Tayan; Tanjung – Batas Kota Sanggau (Sampled on November 16, 2017)

1 Senyabang Base Camp – Infront of Office 31 193

2 Bunut Base Camp – Infront of security outpost 178 314

3 Bodok Base Camp - Infront of security outpost 57 175

CW-06: Tebas - Singkawang Section 1 (previously Singkawang overlay), Tebas -

Singkawang Section 2, Sambas Bypass, Galing - Tanjung Harapan and Sambas – Tanjung

Harapan

Sampled on March 7, 2017

1 Kubangga Village, Teluk Keramat District, Sambas Regency - 105

2 Base Camp Sebawi District, Sambas Regency - 5

Sampled December 17, 2017

1 Kubangga Village, Teluk Keramat District, Sambas Regency - 105

2 Base Camp Sebawi District, Sambas Regency - 85

CW-07: Tebas - Intersection Tanjung – Galing, Aruk (Sarawak border) - Intersection

Tanjung (sampled on August 2, 2017)

1 Work area along project alignment, Sambas Regency - 24

2 Work area along project alignment, Sambas Regency - 28

30. North Kalimantan. There are two ongoing CW packages in North Kalimantan i.e.

CW-08 and CW-11 in 2017. However, only CW-08 conducted the ambient air quality

sampling every month, although the samples were analyzed only for TSP. No air

sampling was conducted by CW-11 for that year.

2017 Annual Environmental Monitoring Report (AEMR)

Regional Roads Development Project (RRDP)

23

31. Based on the submitted data by CW-08, air quality monitoring was conducted monthly

from January to December 2017 and analyzed for TSP parameter only. The Contractor

(PT. Waskita Karya) used their own sampling equipment, instead of the requirement

under the IEE that air sample collection should be conducted by accredited third party

laboratory. It is also unclear whether the 1-hour or 24-hour sampling was conducted for

this purpose. The sampling points within the road alignment, except the one at Bojong

Honje village, and time of sampling were also not indicated. If compared to the threshold

value for 24-hour sampling of 230 µg/Nm3, the results indicated are below the threshold

value.

Table 9: Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Results for North Kalimantan Packages

No Road Section / Sampling Point (Sampling Date) TSP (µg/Nm3)

Sampled in January 2017

1 Road alignment/Tapal Proyek 129.49

2 Bojong Honje village 133.51

Sampled in February 2017

1 Road alignment/Tapal Proyek 129.49

2 Bojong Honje village 133.51

Sampled in March 2017

1 Road allignment/Tapal Proyek 129.81

2 Bojong Honje village 124.51

Sampled in April 2017

1 Road alignment/Tapal Proyek 129.49

2 Bojong Honje village 133.51

Sampled in May 2017

1 Road alignment/Tapal Proyek 128.91

2 Bojong Honje village 134.01

Sampled in June 2017

1 Road alignment/Tapal Proyek 129.49

2 Bojong Honje village 133.51

Sampled in July 2017

1 Road alignment / Tapal Proyek 129.49

2 Bojong Honje village 133.51

Sampled in August 2017

1 Road alignment 127.65

2 Bojong Honje village 132.08

2017 Annual Environmental Monitoring Report (AEMR)

Regional Roads Development Project (RRDP)

24

No Road Section / Sampling Point (Sampling Date) TSP (µg/Nm3)

Sampled in September 2017

1 Road alignment / Tapal Proyek 129.65

2 Bojong Honje village 133.57

Sampled in October 2017

1 Road allignment / Tapal Proyek 130.01

2 Bojong Honje village 127.56

Sampled in November 2017

1 Road allignment / Tapal Proyek 129.49

2 Bojong Honje village 133.51

Sampled in December 2017

1 Road allignment / Tapal Proyek 129.49

2 Bojong Honje village 133.51

4.3.2. Noise Monitoring Data

32. The interpretation of the noise monitoring results for the Central Java, West

Kalimantan and North Kalimantan CW packages are presented in Table 10,

33. Table 11 and Table 12 respectively, and are interpreted as follows:

34. Central Java. Except for Intersection Pracimontoro and STA 6+250 with noise level

readings of 75 dB(A) and 77 dB(A) respectively, which is slightly higher than the standard

of 70 dB(A) for commercial areas as stipulated in Ministry of Environment Decree No.

Kep-48/MENLH/11/1996 on Ambient Noise Standards, the results for the noise sampling

conducted in Central Java CW packages were in the range of 51 to 69 dB(A) and are

within the same standard. Intersection Pracimontoro is an intersection and therefore,

vehicle volume is higher than along the alignment. Whereas at STA 6+250, heavy

equipment machine for asphalt was in operation during the sampling.

Table 10: Noise Level Measurements for Central Java CW Packages

No Road Section / Sampling Point Noise level [(db)A] Remarks

CW-01: Tambak Mulyo-Wawar – sampled in October 12, 2017

1 Road alignment / Tapal Proyek 58.2 Commercial Area

2 Road alignment / Tapal Proyek 51.1 Commercial Area

CW-02: Giriwoyo - Duwet

Sampled in March 20, 2017

2017 Annual Environmental Monitoring Report (AEMR)

Regional Roads Development Project (RRDP)

25

No Road Section / Sampling Point Noise level [(db)A] Remarks

1 Intersection Pracimantoro 75 Commercial Area

Sampled in September 27, 2017

1 Sta 0+00 Iintersection Giriwoyo 68 Commercial Area

2 Intersection Giribelah 65 Commercial Area

3 Intersection Pracimantoro 69 Commercial Area

4 STA 23+700 61 Commercial Area

5 STA 6+250 77 Commercial Area

Note: Ministry of Environment Decree No. Kep-48/MENLH/11/1996 on Ambient Noise Standards: Residential area: 55 dB(A); Commercial/industrial area: 70 dB(A)

35. West Kalimantan. Noise measurements for CW-05: Sosok – Tayan; Tanjung –

Batas Kota Sangau road sections in West Kalimantan were undertaken at the contractor‟s camps in Senyabang, Bunut and Bodok and can be considered as workplace areas

indicating noise level for occupational exposure rather than representing ambient noise

level.. Therefore, the results cannot be interpreted against the ambient noise standards

stipulated by the MOE Decree No. KEP-48/1996.. However, the asphalt mixing plant and

stone crusher in Bunut with results of 89.9 and 90.9 dB(A) respectively are approximately

350 meters from a residential area and may have an impact. The contractor was advised

to conduct the next noise sampling near this residential area if it complies with the 55

dB(A) standard for residential areas and at the road alignment work areas instead.

36. The ambient noise levels measured at CW-06 at Kubangga Village of 77.5 and 75.5

dB(A) for noise sampling conducted in March and December 2017 respectively, is above

the standard of 55 dB(A) for residential areas. During the time of sampling, road

construction works were ongoing and the associated equipment for this type of works

were in operation.

37. The specific location where the noise sampling was conducted for CW-07 is not

indicated in the report or the laboratory results. Therefore, it cannot be determined

whether residential or commercial noise standards apply. While the results are within the

standard for commercial areas (70 dB(A)), it is above the standard of 55 dB(A) for

residential areas.

Table 11: Noise Level Measurements for CW Packages in West Kalimantan

No Road Section / Sampling Point Noise level

[(db)A] Remarks

CW-05: Sosok – Tayan; Tanjung – Batas Kota Sanggau– sampled in November 16, 2017

1 Bunut - Asphalt Mixing Plant 89.9 Approximately 350 meters

from a residential area. 2 Bunut - Stone Crusher 90.9

CW-06: CW-06: Tebas - Singkawang Section 1 (previously Singkawang overlay),

2017 Annual Environmental Monitoring Report (AEMR)

Regional Roads Development Project (RRDP)

26

No Road Section / Sampling Point Noise level

[(db)A] Remarks

Tebas - Singkawang Section 2, Sambas Bypass, Galing - Tanjung Harapan and Sambas – Tanjung Harapan

Sampled in March 7, 2017

1 Kubangga Village, Teluk Keramat District, Sambas Regency

77.5 Residential area

Sampled in December 17, 2017

1 Kubangga Village, Teluk Keramat District, Sambas Regency

75.5 Residential area

CW-07: Tebas - Intersection Tanjung – Galing, Aruk (Batas Sarawak) -Intersection tanjung– sampled in August 2, 2017

1 Work area along project alignment, Sambas Regency

64.8 Specific location is not

known 2

Work area along project alignment, Sambas Regency

63.7

Note: Ministry of Environment Decree No. Kep-48/MENLH/11/1996 on Ambient Noise Standards: Residential area: 55 dB(A); Commercial/industrial area: 70 dB(A)

38. North Kalimantan CW Packages. The ambient noise sampling locations for CW-08

are different from the air quality sampling station locations. There are also more, 11 in

total, noise sampling stations. However, some sampling stations are not presented in

Table 12 since the locations are in work areas and not ambient air quality at sensitive

receptor locations

39. The project alignment for CW-08 is a sparsely populated area with long stretches

along the alignment without structures. Based on the submitted report by CW-08, weekly

noise monitoring was conducted and averaged at the end of the month. Presented in

Table 12 are the monthly averages. The exact date and time of sampling are not

indicated in the report submitted. The results indicate that all the results are below the

standard for commercial areas of 70 dB(A). However, the results were slightly higher than

the standard of 55 dB(A) for residential areas. It can be noted that for open areas, the

results were also above 55 dB(A). This is due mainly to the ongoing construction activities

and the operation of construction equipment.

Table 12: Noise Level Measurements for CW Packages in North Kalimantan

NO Road Section / Sampling Point

Noise level [(db)A]

Noise level [(db)A]

Noise level [(db)A]

Remarks

CW-08: Tanjung Selor - Intersection Tiga Tanjung Palas, and Intersection Tiga Tanjung Palas - Sekatak Buji (Section 1)

Sampled in

January 2017 Sampled in Feb. 2017

Sampled in March 2017

1 Baratan Village, Palas District

62.95 56.72 56.19 Residential

area

2017 Annual Environmental Monitoring Report (AEMR)

Regional Roads Development Project (RRDP)

27

NO Road Section / Sampling Point

Noise level [(db)A]

Noise level [(db)A]

Noise level [(db)A]

Remarks

2 STA 50 61.48 60.04 59.33 Open area

3 STA 125 63.11 66.25 66.11 Open area

4 STA 226 62.85 61.45 61.19 Open area

5 Project alignment work area

57.86 62.21 62.28 Open area

6 STA at Pejalin Village 66.17 65.52 65.90 Residential

area

7 Village road at Seriang Village

60.32 56.80 57.08 Residential

area

8 Intersection Pejalin village, Tanjung Palas District

60.80 60.24 60.29 Commercial

area

Sampled in April 2017

Sampled in May 2017

Sampled in June 2017

1 Baratan Village 64.89 57.73 56.29 Residential

area

2 STA 50 62.39 60.15 61.34 Open area

3 STA 125 64.17 66.36 68.11 Open area

4 STA 226 63.85 62.43 62.02 Open area

5 Project alignment work area

60.83 63.31 64.26 Open area

6 STA at Pejalin Village 66.18 65.49 65.86 Residential

area

7 Village road at Seriang Village

61.37 59.87 59.75 Residential

area

8 intersection Gunung Pejalin

61.71 61.20 62.30 Commercial

area

Sampled in July 2017

Sampled in August 2017

Sampled in Sept. 2017

1 Baratan Village 63.89 58.73 59.29 Residential

area

2 STA 50 62.49 61.15 61.09 Open area

3 STA 125 64.13 66.51 69.11 Open area

4 STA 226 64.85 63.23 62.14 Open area

5 Project alignment work area

61.83 64.91 65.27 Open area

6 STA at Pejalin Village 66.28 66.19 65.16 Residential

area

2017 Annual Environmental Monitoring Report (AEMR)

Regional Roads Development Project (RRDP)

28

NO Road Section / Sampling Point

Noise level [(db)A]

Noise level [(db)A]

Noise level [(db)A]

Remarks

7 Village road at Seriang Village

61.17 60.87 61.35 Residential

area

8 intersection Gunung Pejalin

61.55 61.45 62.60 Commercial

area

Sampled in

October 2017 Sampled in Nov. 2017

Sampled in Dec. 2017

1 Baratan Village 63.69 59.73 59.09 Residential

area

2 STA 50 61.69 60.25 60.19 Open area

3 STA 125 63.23 65.41 66.11 Open area

4 STA 226 63.75 62.13 61.24 Open area

5 Project alignment work area

60.83 63.81 65.37 Open area

6 STA at Pejalin Village 65.26 65.13 64.16 Residential

area

7 Village road at Seriang Village

60.67 59.77 61.22 Residential

area

8 intersection Gunung Pejalin

60.61 60.85 61.63 Commercial

area

Note: Ministry of Environment Decree No. Kep-48/MENLH/11/1996 on Ambient Noise Standards: Residential area: 55 dB(A); Commercial/industrial area: 70 dB(A)

4.4. Environmental Monitoring by the DSC

40. DSC-1 and DSC-2 reported that they had mobilized their respective environmental

specialists to the project sites since September 2017. Monthly Environmental Monitoring

reports containing the related checklists prepared by the contractors were regularly

submitted by the DSC to the PMU. However, the said checklists were unsigned and not

supported by site inspection, monitoring reports or photographs by the DSC. Thus, actual

observations of the CTC during the site visits and ad-hoc communication between the

PMU/CTC, DSC and contractors were conducted to present the overall status of the

environmental monitoring conducted by the DSC for the RRDP. Based on these

information and observations, the status of environmental monitoring conducted by DSC

is categorized as „implemented, in progress, not implemented or not applicable‟ (see

Table 13).

2017 Annual Environmental Monitoring Report (AEMR)

Regional Roads Development Project (RRDP)

29

Table 13: Environmental Monitoring Undertaken by DSC

Aspect / Location Parameters Monitoring Means/

Frequency Guideline Values/Standards/

Indicators Status in 2017 and Justifications

1. Quarries and borrow operation

Quarry and borrow

sites

Undertaken in

designated areas duly

licensed/ approved by

concerned authority.

Monthly visual

inspection to ensure fill

is only obtained from

licensed designated

sites

(i) Environmental permit/

approval from concerned

agency.

In progress - only the quarry of CW-01 has no Environmental

Permit but has already secured UKL-UPL approval. All the

other ongoing CW-packages have complied with this

requirement.

(ii) Activities shall be limited to licensed designated areas only.

In progress - only the quarry of CW-01 has no Environmental Permit but has already secured UKL-UPL approval. All the other activities are conducted in licensed designated areas.

Quarry and borrow sites

Implementation of erosion control

Monthly visual inspection

(i) No evidence of water ponding or presence of fresh gullies.

Not implemented – no inspection report or photos on water ponding or presence of fresh gullies was available.

(ii) No increased visual turbidity of surface water.

Not implemented – no inspection report or photos on increased turbidity of freshwater.

Quarry and borrow sites

Proper site closure as specified in the environmental mitigation plan.

Monthly visual inspection

(i) Pre-quarry conditions In progress – the pre-quarry conditions are typically documented in the UKL-UPL document; but as this document does not exist for CW-01, the status of this monitoring is considered in progress.

(ii) Site left in a tidy state with stable side slopes, proper drainage and provided with vegetation cover.

In progress – Site closure reports for CW-02, CW-06 and

CW-07 have already been submitted and certified by the

DSC. The site closure reports for CW-03, CW-04, CW-08,

CW-09 and CW-10, which have finished construction

activities as of December 2017, are not yet available and

thus the monitoring status is considered “In progress” Not applicable – for the quarries and borrow sites that are

still operated to support the CW-01 and CW-05. CW-11 does

not operate a quarry.

(iii) DSC‟s report testifying to completion of restoration work

In progress – the same justification as for point (ii).

2017 Annual Environmental Monitoring Report (AEMR)

Regional Roads Development Project (RRDP)

30

Table 13: Environmental Monitoring Undertaken by DSC

Aspect / Location Parameters Monitoring Means/

Frequency Guideline Values/Standards/

Indicators Status in 2017 and Justifications

2. Material storage sites

Project alignment, construction yard

Compliance with requirements

Monthly visual inspection

(i) Activities shall be limited to designated areas only

Implemented – the activities are delineated as part of construction activities.

(ii) Materials management procedures implemented.

In progress – clean-up activities are ongoing. However, there is still a need to improve the storage and management of asphalt and other hydrocarbons in the CW packages.

(iii) No visible puddles of oil or oil contaminated soil.

In progress – clean-up activities are being undertaken. However, this needs to be done regularly with the wastes properly collected and stored prior to final disposal.

4. Landslide/Rockfall

Active landslide/ rock fall sections and steep mountainous slopes

Vegetation cover is maintained.

Monthly visual Inspection

(i) Identified areas during detailed design phase.

Implemented – areas for vegetation cover is identified and included in the contract for some CW packages.

(ii) Adequacy, quality, and specifications of planting; Survival rate of plants.

Not implemented – there is no data available as to the actual survival rate of plants since only the planting area is included in the contract.

Slope stabilization engineering structures

Slope stabilization measures, landslide/ rockfall protection measures

Monthly visual inspection

Adequacy, quality, and specifications of landslide/rock fall protection measures.

In progress – construction of landslide/rock fall protection measures are still ongoing.

5. Hydrocarbon and chemical storage

Construction camps

Compliance with environmental mitigation requirements

Monthly visual Inspection of storage facilities

Provision of adequate storage facilities

Not implemented – the CW-8, CW-9, CW-10 and CW-11 inspected indicate that lubricant, fuel and asphalt drums are scattered inside the AMP and base camp complex. No secondary containment to contain spill/leak is provided.

2017 Annual Environmental Monitoring Report (AEMR)

Regional Roads Development Project (RRDP)

31

Table 13: Environmental Monitoring Undertaken by DSC

Aspect / Location Parameters Monitoring Means/

Frequency Guideline Values/Standards/

Indicators Status in 2017 and Justifications

6. Waste management

Construction camps

Cleanliness of workers‟ camps

Monthly visual inspection

(i) Proper collection, storage, and disposal of solid waste.

In progress – storage and disposal of solid wastes is implemented but needs improvement.

(ii) Provision of clean and adequate sanitation facilities.

In progress – sanitation facilities are provided but not properly maintained.

Proper site closure

Monthly visual inspection

(i) Timely and effective waste disposal.

Not implemented – 8 out of 11 CW packages have finished construction activities. However, some construction wastes have not been disposed.

(ii) Site appearance restored. As above

(iii) DSC‟s report testifying restoration of site.

As above.

7. Surface water quality

Bridge construction sites

Local surface waters are protected

Monthly visual inspection of water management

(i) Project activities do not cause turbidity/siltation and flow obstruction of surface waters.

Implemented – no public complaints were received or reported about surface water.

(ii) Adequacy, quality, and specifications of protection measures provided against washouts.

Implemented – protection measures such as retaining walls were provided at the time of bridge construction.

All bridge construction sites – upstream and directly downstream of major rivers or after a pollution event

(i) Total suspended solids (TSS)

(ii) Oil and grease,

(iii) Turbidity,

(iv) pH

Water sample collection and analyses by accredited laboratory

(i) once before commencement of construction works (baseline); and

(ii) subsequently after a reported pollution event and/or complaints)

Standardization of River Categories II based on Governmental Regulation No. 82 of 2001

Not applicable – the IEE of RRDP only requires water sampling since there is no reported water pollution events or community complaints.

2017 Annual Environmental Monitoring Report (AEMR)

Regional Roads Development Project (RRDP)

32

Table 13: Environmental Monitoring Undertaken by DSC

Aspect / Location Parameters Monitoring Means/

Frequency Guideline Values/Standards/

Indicators Status in 2017 and Justifications

8. Air quality

Sensitive sites e.g. settlements, schools, hospitals, etc., close to construction sites and other project-related facilities where emission of high dust levels occur

(i) TSP

(ii) PM10

Air sample collection and analyses by accredited laboratory

(i) once before commencement of construction works; and

(ii) subsequently 1 time a year

Government Regulation No. 41 of 1999 on Air Pollution Control

In progress - 6 out of 9 ongoing CW packages conducted ambient air quality monitoring, but the parameters analyzed are partial.

Asphalt mixing plant Designated areas

Monthly visual inspection to ensure asphalt plant is located >1 km from residential areas

i) Environmental approval/permit from concerned agency.

In progress – Only seven out of 11 RRDP‟s CW packages have secured UKL-UPL approval, Environmental Permit and SPPL.

ii) Activities shall be limited to designated areas only

Implemented - activities are limited to designated areas inside the asphalt mixing plant compound.

Dust

Compliance with required mitigation measures

Monthly visual inspection to ensure dust suppression work plan is being implemented

i) Measures, location, and schedule for dust suppression activities

In progress – dust suppression activities were not consistently implemented.

ii) Air pollution control

equipment installed on

vehicles

Implemented – the construction vehicles have installed air

pollution control in their exhaust system.

iii) No complaints from

residents

Implemented - no formal complaints were received from

residents.

9. Noise

Sensitive areas

Noise levels in dB(A)

Noise level measurement:

(i) Once before commencement of construction activities; and

(ii) Subsequently twice per year

i) Government Regulation No. 41 of 1999 on Air Pollution Control.

In progress - 6 out of 9 ongoing CW packages conducted ambient air quality monitoring, but the parameters analyzed are partial.

ii) Complaints from residents Implemented - no complaints were received from residents.

2017 Annual Environmental Monitoring Report (AEMR)

Regional Roads Development Project (RRDP)

33

Table 13: Environmental Monitoring Undertaken by DSC

Aspect / Location Parameters Monitoring Means/

Frequency Guideline Values/Standards/

Indicators Status in 2017 and Justifications

10. Vibration

Sensitive areas

Compliance with required mitigation measures

Monthly visual inspection

Complaints from residents Implemented - no complaints were received from nearby residents.

11. Landscaping/Reforestation

Project alignment

Progress of reforestation activities

Monthly visual inspection

i) Adequacy, quality, and specifications of planting

Not implemented – this guideline is not specified in the construction contract of RRDP.

ii) Survival rate of plants Not implemented – this guideline is not specified in the construction contract of RRDP.

iii) Watchman on site Not implemented – this guideline is not specified in the construction contract of RRDP.

12. Community

Project alignment

(i) Consultations

(ii) Information disclosure

Ongoing consultation with government and community groups along the alignment to monitor environmental concerns

(i) Number of public consultations conducted

In progress – informal communication was reportedly made with local residents prior to start of construction activities.

(ii) Recipients of project-related documents

In progress - project related documents are only for contractor and local government

(iii) Number of complaints In progress - no community complaints were reported in 2017 in the light of consultation and information disclosure.

13. Traffic management

Project alignment

(i) Number of complaints

(ii) Number of traffic enforcers in place

(iii) Number of traffic and warning signs in place

Ongoing visual inspection to strict adherence to applicable environmental mitigation measures

Number of complaints and accidents

In progress – no complaints were received. Some work areas were observed to have no traffic enforcers and the traffic and warning signs inadequate.

2017 Annual Environmental Monitoring Report (AEMR)

Regional Roads Development Project (RRDP)

34

PART V. ADB REVIEW MISSION AND CTC SITE INSPECTION

41. The CTC National Environmental Specialist was mobilized in September 2017 and

conducted environmental monitoring in Central Java CW packages together with the CTC

International Environmental Specialist. Further, these specialists joined the ADB Project

Review Missions to the CW packages in West and North Kalimantan in the period of April

to May 2017 and November to December 2017. Key non-compliances with the IEE of

RRDP identified at these missions and site inspection including corresponding corrective

actions and its implementation status (as of December 2017) are presented in Table 14.

2017 Annual Environmental Monitoring Report (AEMR)

Regional Roads Development Project (RRDP)

35

Table 14: Non-Compliance/Issue Identified, Corrective Action and Its Status as of 2017

Package Non-Compliance/Issue Identified

by Corrective Actions Status

Central Java

CW-01 The quarry has UKL-UPL approval issued by

the KLH of Kabupaten Kebumen, but there is

no evidence that the Environmental Permit

has been secured.

CTC Secure the Environmental Permit as

soon as possible

In progress - the contractor is in the process of

applying for the Environmental Permit.

CW-01 The Asphalt mixing plant (AMP) has UKL-UPL

approval but no Environmental Permit.

CTC Secure the Environmental Permit as

soon as possible

Implemented – the Environmental Permit No.

594/833/2017 (dated November 17, 2017) granted by

Government of Kebumen Regency (see Appendix

B.2).

CW-02 Reflectors installed at deep embankments

along the alignment are barely noticeable

during the day. The size of the reflectors is

small, and they are sparsely spaced.

(Sta 20+550, October 2017)

CTC Install warning signs in accordance to

contract specifications.

Implemented – the correct warning signs have been

installed.

(Sta 20+550, December 2017)

CW-02 Bridge approaches do not have warning signs

installed.

CTC Install warning signs in accordance to

contract specifications.

In progress - Gate posts are installed while the guard

rails are still being installed at the approaches to the

bridges along the alignment.

2017 Annual Environmental Monitoring Report (AEMR)

Regional Roads Development Project (RRDP)

36

Table 14: Non-Compliance/Issue Identified, Corrective Action and Its Status as of 2017

Package Non-Compliance/Issue Identified

by Corrective Actions Status

(Sasem bridge, October 2017)

(Sasem bridge, December 2017)

CW-02 Cross drain box culverts at various stations along the road alignment are not connected to drainage lines/waterways causing flooding of adjacent areas/farms during rainy events.

(March 29, 2017, STA 22+300)

CTC Evaluate and prepare appropriate

design for approval and

implementation.

Implemented - Addendum 4 submitted and approved

by IDB in June 2017 for these works. These

corrective actions have been completed.

(December 2017, STA 22+300)

West Kalimantan

CW-05 Improper management of used drums, spilled

tar and used lubricant that does not comply

ADB in

April/May

Coordinate with the local

Environmental Agency to dispose

In progress - clean-up of spilled tar and lubricants

was ongoing. Empty drums are temporarily stored in

2017 Annual Environmental Monitoring Report (AEMR)

Regional Roads Development Project (RRDP)

37

Table 14: Non-Compliance/Issue Identified, Corrective Action and Its Status as of 2017

Package Non-Compliance/Issue Identified

by Corrective Actions Status

with the requirements of Environmental

Protection and Management Act no. 32/2009

and the Government Regulation No. 101/2014

on Management Procedures of Hazardous

and Toxic Wastes was observed at the AMP

of the contractor working for CW-05.

(May 2017, Contractor AMP in Bunut Village)

and Nov/

Dec 2017

these wastes according to the

requirements of the mentioned laws

and regulations.

These requirements include that

waste disposal should be undertaken

by the company licensed by the the

Ministry of Environment and Forestry

and completed with the required

manifest.

a specific area prior to collection by Mr. Somad, who

transports them to a drum collection center in

Pontianak, for subsequent delivery to a recycling

facility. It is unclear whether these parties have the

required licenses to handle hazardous/toxic wastes.

Spilled/waste asphalt has been verbally requested by

the local village to be used in the village roads/paths.

(November 2017 Contractor AMP in Bunut Village)

CW-05 Empty asphalt drums and spilled asphalt were

scattered in the canal/ditch beside a palm oil

plantation.

CTC

Remove asphalt drums and spilled

asphalt and clean-up the ditch. Store

spilled asphalt drums and collected

spilled asphalt in a specific area with

impermeable surface.

Implemented – these empty drums have been

removed from the ditch, and clean-up of the ditch has

been undertaken.

2017 Annual Environmental Monitoring Report (AEMR)

Regional Roads Development Project (RRDP)

38

Table 14: Non-Compliance/Issue Identified, Corrective Action and Its Status as of 2017

Package Non-Compliance/Issue Identified

by Corrective Actions Status

(May 2017, Contractor AMP in Bunut Village)

(December 2017, Contractor AMP in Bunut Village)

CW-05 A Restoration Action Plan of AMP, base camp,

and quarry as well as other ecologically

disturbed areas for the project has not been

developed.

ADB Develop the Restoration Action

Plan for these areas.

The completion certificate should

be provided upon restoration of the

site, including the detail information

on the waste (both hazardous and

non-hazardous waste disposed

from this site).

In progress – the Project is still ongoing. However,

the initial steps towards the preparation of the

Restoration Action Plan is already being undertaken.

CW-05 Dusty road condition at Simpang Tanjung-

Bodok road section (STA 1+325) indicating

that dewatering was lacking.

ADB Undertake more frequent road

watering during dry weather

condition

Enforce speed limit at the road

sections under construction

Increase supervision

Implemented - watering activity undertaken twice a

day or as necessary. This road section has already

been completed.

2017 Annual Environmental Monitoring Report (AEMR)

Regional Roads Development Project (RRDP)

39

Table 14: Non-Compliance/Issue Identified, Corrective Action and Its Status as of 2017

Package Non-Compliance/Issue Identified

by Corrective Actions Status

(Nov. 2017, STA 1+325 in Bodok Village)

(December 2017, in Bodok Village)

CW-05 First Aid kits were observed to be incomplete

and of poor conditions at the AMP.

ADB Complete the first aid kits with tools

and medicines

Train the dedicated personnel on

first aid skills.

Implemented - New first aid kits are already available

and dedicated personnel trained.

(Dec. 2017, Contractor Base Camp in Bunut Village)

CW-06 Uncollected spilled asphalt in the asphalt tank

area was observed at the AMP.

CTC Clean-up the area including spilled

asphalt.

Provide temporary storage area for

collected asphalt with impermeable

In progress - clean-up was done and the spilled asphalt was collected and used as asphalt pavement at the intersection of the project alignment and the village road leading to the contractor‟s camp/AMP. The AMP is not used anymore since the project

2017 Annual Environmental Monitoring Report (AEMR)

Regional Roads Development Project (RRDP)

40

Table 14: Non-Compliance/Issue Identified, Corrective Action and Its Status as of 2017

Package Non-Compliance/Issue Identified

by Corrective Actions Status

(Nov 2017, Contractor AMP in Sebawi Village)

flooring. already completed in December 2017, and therefore the temporary storage area was not constructed (see Appendix D.5).

CW-06 First Aid kits were observed to be incomplete

and of poor conditions.

ADB Complete the first aid kits with tools

and medicines

Train the dedicated personnel on

first aid skills.

Implemented - First aid kit provided and equipped

with tools and medicines.

CW-07 A Restoration Action Plan of AMP, base camp,

and quarry as well as other ecologically

disturbed areas for the project has not been

developed.

ADB Develop the Restoration Action

Plan.

The completion certificate should

be provided upon restoration of the

site, including the information on

hazardous and non-hazardous

waste disposed from this site.

Implemented - At the time of the ADB mission, the

AMP, base camp and quarry have been turned-over

for the APBN-funded road project. As such, all the

environmental responsibilities, including the disposal

of the used drums and spilled asphalt has also been

transferred to the new project as substantiated by the

relevant documents included in Appendix D.2.

North Kalimantan

CW-08 The car pool at the AMP is located right

beside the Kayan River. Spilled used oil from

construction trucks and equipment directly

drained into the Kayan River. There was no oil

and water separator or similar anti-pollution

device.

CTC Clean up the area and install oil and

water separator or continuously

monitor oil spills and conduct

immediately collection and temporarily

store in impermeable containers prior

to final disposal in accordance with

government regulations.

Implemented - The area has been cleaned-up and

not used anymore for RRDP, and therefore part of the

corrective actions is no longer applicable.

2017 Annual Environmental Monitoring Report (AEMR)

Regional Roads Development Project (RRDP)

41

Table 14: Non-Compliance/Issue Identified, Corrective Action and Its Status as of 2017

Package Non-Compliance/Issue Identified

by Corrective Actions Status

(September 5, 2017, Contractor AMP beside Kayan River)

(December 2017, Contractor AMP beside Kayan River)

CW-08 Warning signs installed in the landslide areas

are small and located immediately before the

landslide area.

(September 6, 2017, Sta 16+200)

CTC Install correct warning signs in

accordance with contract

specifications.

In progress - warning signs have been improved and

personnel are posted at the construction site to warn

motorists.

(December 2017, Sta 16+200)

CW-08 Improper management of used drums, spilled

tar, and hydrocarbon wastes (e.g. lubricant) at

the AMP that does not comply with the

CTC

Develop the Restoration Action

Plan.

The completion certificate should

In progress - clean-up of the AMP, contractor‟s camp is ongoing. Empty drums previously containing

asphalt and other hydrocarbon materials have been

2017 Annual Environmental Monitoring Report (AEMR)

Regional Roads Development Project (RRDP)

42

Table 14: Non-Compliance/Issue Identified, Corrective Action and Its Status as of 2017

Package Non-Compliance/Issue Identified

by Corrective Actions Status

requirements of Environmental Protection and

Management Act No. 32/2009 and particularly

the Government Regulation No. 101/2014 on

Management Procedures of Hazardous and

Toxic Wastes.

(September 5, 2017, Contractor AMP

beside Kayan River)

be provided upon restoration of the

site, including the information on

hazardous and non-hazardous

waste disposed from this site.

donated to the local government (see Appendix D.6).

(December 2017, Contractor AMP beside Kayan

River)

CW-08 A Restoration Action Plan of AMP, base camp,

and quarry as well as other ecologically

disturbed areas for the project has not been

developed.

ADB Develop the Restoration Action

Plan.

The completion certificate should

be provided upon restoration of the

site, including the information on

hazardous and non-hazardous

waste disposed from this site.

Not implemented – related environmental site closure

report has not been submitted to PMU/CTC.

CW-09 A Restoration Action Plan of the AMP, base camp, and quarry of the contractor (PT Mahir Jaya Mahakam Raya) has not been developed.

ADB

As above Not applicable – it was informed that the AMP has been turned over to APBN Project since March 20, 2017. This includes among others the responsibility on environmental matters including the management and disposal of used drums and asphalt and hydrocarbon wastes that has been transferred to the new project (see Appendix D.3).

CW-10 Improper management of used drums, spilled ADB Coordinate with the local Not implemented - no report available stating that

2017 Annual Environmental Monitoring Report (AEMR)

Regional Roads Development Project (RRDP)

43

Table 14: Non-Compliance/Issue Identified, Corrective Action and Its Status as of 2017

Package Non-Compliance/Issue Identified

by Corrective Actions Status

tar, and hydrocarbon wastes (e.g. lubricant)

was observed at the AMP used for CW-10

construction.

Environmental Agency to dispose

these wastes according to the

requirements of the mentioned laws

and regulations.

These requirements include that

waste disposal should be undertaken

by the company licensed by the the

Ministry of Environment and Forestry

and completed with the required

manifest.

these drums have been properly disposed of.

CW-10 A Restoration Action Plan of AMP, base camp,

and quarry as well as other ecologically

disturbed areas for the project has not been

developed.

ADB Develop the Restoration Action

Plan.

The completion certificate should

be provided upon restoration of the

site, including the information on

hazardous and non-hazardous

waste disposed from this site.

Not implemented - no report available stating that

proper environmental site closure has been

undertaken.

2017 Annual Environmental Monitoring Report (AEMR)

Regional Roads Development Project (RRDP)

44

Table 14: Non-Compliance/Issue Identified, Corrective Action and Its Status as of 2017

Package Non-Compliance/Issue Identified

by Corrective Actions Status

CW-11 The settling pond is almost full and is due for

desludging.

(September 2017, Contractor AMP in Tabur

Lestari Village)

CTC Desludge the settling pond and

perform regular maintenance to avoid

overflow.

Implemented - settling pond has been desludged as

stated by the contractor that this activity is done

regularly. Caution tape has also been installed as a

safety measure.

(December 2017, Contractor AMP in Tabur Lestari

Village)

CW-11 Asphalt drums and construction materials were observed in the area adjacent to the jetty.

(September 2017, Contractor jetty/temporary material storage area beside Gerong river)

CTC Monitor and implement measures to

avoid polluting the river.

Implemented - the empty drums have been moved back farther from the river and monitored by the contractor staff assigned at the jetty and temporary material storage area.

(September 2017, Contractor jetty/temporary material

storage area beside Gerong river)

2017 Annual Environmental Monitoring Report (AEMR)

Regional Roads Development Project (RRDP)

45

Table 14: Non-Compliance/Issue Identified, Corrective Action and Its Status as of 2017

Package Non-Compliance/Issue Identified

by Corrective Actions Status

CW-11 The old bridge and construction debris at

Bridge Sta 12 + 600 Segment 2 has not yet

been removed and may cause obstruction to

the free flow of water.

(September 2017, Sta 12 + 600 Segment 2)

Remove debris and perform clean-up

activities.

Not Implemented - the old bridge has not yet been

removed. The contractor is still coordinating for the

equipment to be used to remove the bridge and

transfer to the contractor‟s base camp.

CW-11 A Restoration Action Plan of AMP, base camp,

and quarry as well as other ecologically

disturbed areas for the project has not been

developed.

ADB Develop the Restoration Action

Plan.

The completion certificate should

be provided upon restoration of the

site, including the information on

hazardous and non-hazardous

waste disposed from this site.

Not applicable - since the project is still ongoing.

However, initial work is already being undertaken for

the development of the Restoration Action Plan

CW-11 Empty drums were observed scattered at the

AMP compound.

CTC Collect scattered drums and store in

one location prior to final disposal.

In progress - empty drums are flattened and then

used for fencing the contractor‟s facilities. Some drums were given to the local community.

2017 Annual Environmental Monitoring Report (AEMR)

Regional Roads Development Project (RRDP)

46

Table 14: Non-Compliance/Issue Identified, Corrective Action and Its Status as of 2017

Package Non-Compliance/Issue Identified

by Corrective Actions Status

(September 2017, Contractor AMP in Tabur

Lestari Village)

(December 2017, Contractor AMP in Tabur Lestari

Village)

2017 Annual Environmental Monitoring Report (AEMR)

Regional Roads Development Project (RRDP)

47

PART VI. KEY ISSUES FOR RESOLUTION

42. Table 15 summarizes the key issues identified in 2016 and 2017 that should be

resolved by the parties identified in the following table. The corrective actions should be

completed and reported in the next environmental monitoring report i.e. the Semester

1/2018 report. Issues or gaps regarding the EMP implementation that are described in the

earlier tables should also be resolved and reported in the next reporting period. It is noted

that some of the key issues are recurrence since 2015.

Table 15 : Key Issues and Required Corrective Actions

Key issues Corrective Action Responsible Party

Lacking evidence such as

signed checklist and

written justification,

inspection report, photo,

minutes of meeting

justifying whether EMP is

implemented or not

Provide these evidences Executing Agency

All contractors

DSC

Incomplete environmental

approval and permits for

the road construction

Provide evidence that the environmental approval

and/or Environmental Permit for:

CW-06: Tebas - Singkawang Section 1 and

Section 2 road sections Environmental Permits

CW-06: Sambas Bypass road section UKL-UPL

approval and Environmental Permit

Directorate General

of Highways

Absence of environmental

approval and permits for

AMP and/or Quarry

Provide evidences that the environmental approval

and permits for the quarry and asphalt mixing plant

(AMP) have been acquired and include in the site

closure report of completed road package CW-03

DSC-2 (Botek

Bosphorus

Technical

Consulting)

Provide evidences that the environmental approval

and permits for the quarry and asphalt mixing plant

(AMP) have been acquired and include in the site

closure report of completed road packages CW-08,

CW-09, and CW-10.

DSC-1 (China

Engineering

Consultants)

Contractors do not

conduct ambient air quality

monitoring and noise

measurements

Conduct air quality sampling and noise level

measurement in 2018 for CW-01 in Central Java

DSC-2 (Botek

Bosphorus

Technical

Consulting)

Conduct air quality sampling and noise level

measurement in 2018 for CW-05 in West

Kalimantan and CW-11 North Kalimantan

DSC-1 (China

Engineering

Consultants)

Management of

hazardous/toxic wastes

not compliant with the

Government Regulation

No 101/2014.

Identify final disposal method for waste asphalt and

empty asphalt drums, used oil and other waste

petroleum-based products that comply with the

mentioned regulation.

All contractors

Safety Fully implement wearing of PPEs and installation of

appropriate warning signs at work areas.

All contractors

2017 Annual Environmental Monitoring Report (AEMR)

Regional Roads Development Project (RRDP)

48

PART VII. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

43. This Annual Environmental Monitoring Report of the Regional Roads Development

Project describes the implementation on environmental management (mitigation and

monitoring) plan by the Executing Agency, including respective contractors, design

supervision consultants, and PMU/core team consultant (CTC), during the project

execution phase in 2017. The conclusions drawn from this 2017 monitoring report are

presented in the following.

44. Lacking formal evidence such as signed checklist and written justification, inspection

reports, photos, minutes of meeting to justify whether EMP has been effectively

implemented or not remains an ongoing concern to date.

45. The UKL-UPL approval of the West Kalimantan for CW-06: Sambas - Tanjung

Harapan road section has been confirmed. However, the evidence whether the

UKL-UPL approval and Environmental Permit for CW-06: Sambas Bypass section

still needs to be confirmed by the Executing Agency. Similarly, the Executing

Agency needs to confirm the existence of Environmental Permit for the Tebas-

Singkawang Sections 1 and 2.

46. There is improvement in the compliance to government regulation on environmental

approvals and permits for the contractor‟s quarries and Asphalt Mixing Plants (AMPs). 6

out of 9 ongoing CW packages in 2017 have the necessary UKL-UPL approval and

Environmental Permit for their quarry and AMP operations. Of the 3 CW packages with

no UKL-UPL approval and environmental permit, CW-01, has already secured UKL-UPL

approval and environmental permit for their AMP. The CW-01 quarry has also already

secured UKL-UPL approval and is awaiting the approval of their Environmental Permit

whilst there is no evidence that CW-09 and CW-10, which completed in March 2017, has

complied with this requirement for both their AMP and quarry.

47. There is improvement in compliance to the ADB-IEE EMP requirement for the conduct

of air quality and noise monitoring. 6 out of 9 CW-packages with ongoing construction

works in 2017 conducted air quality and noise monitoring. CW-09 and CW-10 finished

construction works early in the year, in March 2017. In summary the results show that:

TSP levels are below the government standards except at the AMP and stone crushing

plant of CW-05 which is currently being addressed; and noise levels at construction areas

are lower or slightly higher than government standard values which is common during

actual construction works. Nevertheless, some sampling and analytical methods reported

by the Contractors are unclear whether they adhere to the requirements of prevailing laws

and regulations.

48. CW-02, CW-05, CW-06, CW-07, CW-08 and CW-11 contractors have started to

clean-up activities of spilled/waste asphalt and other hydrocarbon materials as well as

dispose the empty drums. Final disposal methods have been implemented in through the

following methods: recycling the small quantity of collected spilled asphalt for paving of

village roads and other small areas; empty asphalt and hydrocarbon drums were shipped

either to a central drum collection entity or to the suppliers for subsequent shipping to

recycling centers; donation of the empty drums to the local government to be used for

2017 Annual Environmental Monitoring Report (AEMR)

Regional Roads Development Project (RRDP)

49

fencing; or Contractors flattened the empty drums and used them for the fencing of their

own facilities.

49. Site closure reports have already been submitted by the DSCs for 3 out of 9 CW

packages that finished construction activities as of December 2017. The DSC is currently

continuing to conduct site validation for the other CW packages.

50. DSC-1 and DSC-2 have only mobilized their Environmental Specialists since

September 2017. The DSC Monthly Environmental Report in the form of checklist still

needs to be improved in terms of monitoring content to include implementation of

mitigating measures with corresponding photographs and proof of review of contractor

submitted environmental documents and reports. The Monthly Environmental Monitoring

Checklists should also be signed, dated and provided with written justifications by the

parties concerned.

51. There is significant improvement in the implementation of corrective actions and

mitigating measures by the contractors during the course of 2017.

Appendix A

Implementation of Environmental Mitigating Measures – Construction Phase

APPENDIX A

Implementation of Environmental Mitigation Measures – Construction Phase (2017)

Note: “F” – Fully Implemented, “P” – Partially Implemented, “N” – Not Implemented

Issue/Potential Impact Mitigation DSC-02 DSC-01

CW-01 CW-02 CW-05 CW-06 CW-07 CW-08 CW-11

1. Soil and Material

Issue:

Utilization of productive land

Potential impact:

Loss of fertility of arable land

(i) At construction sites and other areas affected by project activities, the topsoil (about 15 cm) will be kept and

refilled after excavation is over to minimize the impact on productive lands. N N N N P N N

(ii) It may be necessary to construct new access roads to aggregate sites, and place them through agricultural lands.

These temporary roads will be made along existing farm tracks so as to avoid losses to agricultural lands. N N N N N N N

(iii) Contractors shall present proposed construction road alignments and hauling schedule for approval by the DSC

before construction is to commence. N N N N F F N

(iv) In unavoidable circumstances, suitable compensation will be paid to people whose land will be temporarily

acquired for the duration of the operations. The compensation will cover for loss of income for the duration of

acquisition and land restoration.

N N N N N N N

(v) Contractors shall avoid as much as possible, usage of productive agricultural land. If such land is used, the

contractor shall restore them to their original state after completion of civil works. N N N N N N N

Issue:

Reclaimed pavement

Potential impact:

Generation of spoils/solid waste

(i) Contractors will be encouraged to recycle reclaimed asphalt pavement in cold mixes or aggregate in granular or

stabilized surface material for subgrade and base layers and village access road maintenance and to use

recyclable materials as much as possible. The material that cannot be reused will be taken to specific official

waste dumping sites approved by the Bapedalda.

N N N N P N N

(ii) All suitable material obtained from roadway excavation work will be used for construction of embankment/

earthen shoulders. N P P N

F

N N

Issue:

Soil erosion

Potential impact: High suspended solid contents of river, sedimentation.

(i) Erosion control and slope stabilization measures shall be provided such as: (a) side ditches and berms, rock

lining and slope walls along the road, where appropriate. (b) proper drainage system (c) shrub buffer strips sites

in areas of high erosion risk (d) cross drainage to accommodate floodwater/run-off in case subproject roads are

on elevated fills that will obstruct natural drainage.

N F F N F F F

(ii) On hill slopes and other potentially erodible places along the roadside, appropriate vegetation that retards

erosion will be planted. N F F N N F F

(iii) On sections with filling and cutting, the slopes will be protected by mild slope and planted with appropriate

vegetation. N F F N P F F

(iv) As much as possible, construction activities in hilly areas are to be undertaken during dry season only. N F F F F F F

Page 1 of 10

APPENDIX A

Issue/Potential Impact Mitigation DSC-02 DSC-01

CW-01 CW-02 CW-05 CW-06 CW-07 CW-08 CW-11

Issue:

Spoils Disposal and stockpiling of construction materials

Potential impact:

Damage to productive land, deterioration of water quality and obstruction of watercourses

(i) Spoils shall only be disposed to areas approved by local authority. F F F F F F F

(ii) Spoil disposal shall not cause sedimentation and obstruction of flow of watercourses, damage to agricultural land

and densely vegetated areas. F F F F F F F

(iii) The spoils disposal site shall be located at least 50 m from surface water courses and shall be protected from

erosion by avoiding formation of steep slopes and grassing. F F F F F F N

(iv) Water courses (rivers, canals, etc.) shall be kept free of excavation spoil and construction debris, floating and

submerged. F F F F F F F

(v) Spoil and construction materials stockpile area shall be located away from waterbodies and under no

circumstances will these materials be dumped into watercourses. F F P F F F N

Issue:

Slope Stability

Potential impact:

Erosion and landslides

(i) A balanced cut and fill approach will be designed for each road link. Excess cut, if any, will be used to shape the

embankment side slopes, strengthening the toe of the high slopes road bench and filling the low lying public

lands and for plantation in pre-approved areas. N N N N P P P

(ii) Embankments shall be monitored during construction for signs of erosion; long-term material stockpiles will be

covered to prevent wind erosion. N P N N F F N

(iii) Retaining structures will be constructed for protection of slopes from landslides and existing vegetation cover

shall be left undisturbed during construction whenever possible. N N N N F N N

(iv) Removal of vegetation and cutting of trees will be done judiciously and limited to minimum possible extent. N P N N F F N

(v) Vegetative cover shall be provided on slopes by planting grass and creepers on erosion and landslide prone

sections. N N N N N N N

(vi) To the extent feasible, the length and steepness of cut and fill slopes will be minimized particularly at borrow,

quarry and spoil sites. N N N N F F N

(vii) Silt dikes and runoff ditches will be installed where appropriate to prevent silt from entering farmland and water

bodies. F N N N N F N

2. Water

Issue:

Construction of bridges/drainage structures in streams/rivers

Potential impact:

Flood, inundation, mudflow, pollution, and adverse effects on runoff flow pattern

(i) Drainage works shall be constructed as designed based on the historical flood data and flood forecasting. F F N N F F F

(ii) Ensure bridge works shall not cause obstruction of river flow and flooding of adjacent area. F F N F F F F

(iii) In sections along rivers and streams, earth and stones will be properly disposed of so that they do not block

rivers and streams, resulting in adverse impact on water quality and flow regime. N F F N F F N

(iv) Slope stabilization measures (e.g., planting of fast growing native species of grass and shrubs, etc.) shall be

implemented on exposed surfaces along river embankments to reduce material wash-away material. N N N N N F N

Page 2 of 10

APPENDIX A

Issue/Potential Impact Mitigation DSC-02 DSC-01

CW-01 CW-02 CW-05 CW-06 CW-07 CW-08 CW-11

(v) Cofferdams, silt fences, sediment barriers or other appropriate devices shall be provided during bridge works to

prevent migration of silt during excavation and boring operations within streams. Dewatering and cleaning of

cofferdams will be performed to prevent siltation by pumping from cofferdams to a settling basin or a containment

unit.

N N N N F N N

(vi) In bridge demolition sites, efforts will be made to avoid "dropping the bridge" into rivers/streams. This will be done

by "sawing" appropriate sections of the bridge and using cranes to lift these sections away, or alternatively by

construction of a platform onto which the bridge could be dropped.

N N N N F F N

Issue: Siltation

Potential impact:

Deterioration of surface water quality

(i) Provide slope stabilization measures on exposed surfaces by planting grass and creepers and implementation of

other suitable measures to reduce washing away of materials. N N N N N N N

(ii) Construction materials containing fine particles, e.g. limestone or laterite, shall be stored in an enclosure such

that sediment laden water does not drain into nearby watercourses, but rather percolates slowly into the soil. N F N N N F F

(iii) Sediment laden construction water will be discharged into settling lagoons or tanks prior to final discharge. N F N F N F F

(iv) Construct retaining structures such as gabion baskets, rip-rap, etc. for river bank protection. N N N N N N

Issue:

Spills from Bitumen Plants

Potential impact:

Contamination of water table or surface drainage – could come from spilled bitumen or petroleum products used to thin the bitumen. Bitumen is stored in drums which may leak or which are often punctured during handling after long periods (> 6 months in the elements) of storage.

(i) Bitumen shall not be allowed to enter either running or dry streambeds and nor will be disposed of in ditches or

small waste disposal sites prepared by the contractor. F F N N P F N

(ii) Bitumen storage and mixing areas as well as storage areas for other petroleum products used in the preparation

of the bitumen mixture shall be protected against spills and all contaminated soil must be properly handled

according to national and local regulations. As a minimum, these areas must be provided with concrete flooring

and surrounded by an embankment to readily contain and clean-up spills. F F N F P F N

3. Air, Noise, and Vibration

Issue:

Air pollution

Potential impact:

Gaseous and dust emissions causing health hazard to workers and nearby residents.

(i) The contractor will submit a dust suppression program prior to construction. The plan will detail action to be taken

to minimize dust generation including specific locations, schedule, etc. (e.g., spraying of roads with water,

vegetation cover in borrow sites), and will identify equipment to be used.

F F F F F F F

(ii) Construction equipment will be maintained to a good standard and idling of engines will be discouraged.

Machinery causing excessive pollution (e.g., visible smoke) will be banned from construction sites. F F F F F F N

(iii) All construction equipment and vehicles shall have valid certifications indicating compliance to vehicle emission

standards. F F F F N N N

(iv) Siting of asphalt plants will be more than 1 km of settlements and other sensitive receptors (schools, hospitals,

etc.) F F F F F F F

(v) Necessary environmental clearance shall be obtained prior to establishment and operation of asphalt mixing F F F F F F N

Page 3 of 10

APPENDIX A

Issue/Potential Impact Mitigation DSC-02 DSC-01

CW-01 CW-02 CW-05 CW-06 CW-07 CW-08 CW-11

plants.

(vi) On rainless day undertake watering, at least twice per day, on dusty and exposed areas at construction yards,

materials stockpile, construction sites, access roads, quarry areas, borrow sites and other project areas where

residential sites and other sensitive receptors are located nearby.

F F F F F F N

(vii) Mixing and crushing plants/operations will be equipped with dust suppression devices such as water sprays.

Operators will wear dust masks and ear protection. F F F F F F N

(viii) Tightly cover trucks transporting construction materials (sand, soil, cement, gravel, etc.) to avoid or minimize

spills and dust emission. F F F F F F F

(ix) Impose speed limits on construction vehicles to minimize dust emission along areas where sensitive receptors

are located (houses, schools, hospitals, etc.). F F F F F F N

Issue:

Noise and vibration from construction activities

Potential impact:

Disturbance/ nuisance to settlements and other sensitive receptors.

(i) As much as possible, locate high vibration generation sources over 50m from residential sites and other

structures. F F N N F F F

(ii) Regularly maintain and repair construction machinery and vehicles to keep these in good condition. F F F N F F N

(iii) Noisy construction activities shall be stopped from 21:00 to 06:00 in areas where sensitive receptors such as

settlements, hospital, etc. will be affected. F F F F F F F

(iv) Inspection will be done before construction equipment enter into construction sites to ensure that these are in

good condition and are fitted with suitable noise suppression devices. F F N N N N N

(v) Impose speed limits on construction vehicles to minimize noise emission along areas where sensitive receptors

are located (houses, schools, hospitals, etc.). F F F F F F F

(vi) Install noise control walls (3.0 - 4.5m high, thick materials) at high noise sources that affect sensitive receptors

(hospital, schools, etc.). N N N N N N N

(vii) Provide workers near sources of loud noise with protection devices such as ear plugs. N N N N N N N

Issue:

Rock blasting

Potential impact:

Explosion and noise

(i) Blasting will be carried out only with permission of Bapedalda and other concerned agencies, using a pre-

established schedule. N N N N N N N

(ii) All the statutory laws, regulation, rules etc., pertaining to acquisition, transport, storage, handling and use of

explosives will be strictly followed. N N N N N N N

(iii) The timing will be made available to the local people within 500m of the blasting site in all directions, depending

on the total charge used. N N N N N N N

(iv) Blasting will be held only during day time and shall be carried out not using high powered explosives. N N N N N N N

(v) W here possible blasting mats will be used to reduce noise levels when blasting is carried out. N N N N N N N

Page 4 of 10

APPENDIX A

Issue/Potential Impact Mitigation DSC-02 DSC-01

CW-01 CW-02 CW-05 CW-06 CW-07 CW-08 CW-11

4. Quarry and Borrow Sites

Issue:

Operation of quarry and borrow areas

Potential impact:

Loss of topsoil and disfigurement of landscape, dust and air pollution, health and safety risks

(i) The maximum gradient after refurbishment of each borrow/quarry slope shall not exceed as average value 1:3.

After implementing terraces and drainage system, vegetation cover shall be provided by seeding grass and

planting both bushes and trees.

F F P P P P N

(ii) Upon completion of extraction activities, quarry and borrow pits shall be dewatered and fences shall be installed,

as appropriate, to minimize health and safety risks. N N N F N F N

(iii) Quarry areas and borrow pits will be left in a tidy state with stable side slopes and proper drainage in order to

avoid erosion F F N F N F N

(iv) To avoid drowning when pits become water-filled, measures such as fencing, providing flotation devices such as

a buoy tied to a rope, etc. shall be implemented. N

N

N N N N N

5. Hazardous Substances Waste

Issue:

Storage of hydrocarbon, toxic, and explosive chemicals

Potential impact:

Contamination from harmful and

(i) Hydrocarbon, toxic material and explosives will be stored in designated sites. Vehicle maintenance and refueling

will be confined to areas in construction sites designed to contain spilled lubricants and fuels. F F N F P F F

(ii) Spill waste will be disposed at approved disposal sites. F F N F P F F

(iii) Adequate precaution will be taken to prevent oil/lubricant/hydrocarbon contamination of channel beds. Spillage if

any will be immediately cleared with utmost caution to leave no traces. F F N F N N F

Page 5 of 10

APPENDIX A

Issue/Potential Impact Mitigation DSC-02 DSC-01

CW-01 CW-02 CW-05 CW-06 CW-07 CW-08 CW-11

(iv) All areas intended for storage of hazardous materials will be quarantined and provided with adequate facilities to

combat emergency situations complying with all the applicable statutory stipulation. F F N F N N F

(v) The personnel in-charge of these sites will be properly trained and these areas will be access controlled and

entry will be allowed only under authorization. N N N N NA N N

(vi) Store fuel and hazardous substances in paved areas with roof and embankment. If spills or leaks do occur,

undertake immediate clean up. F F F F P F F

(vii) Ensure availability of spill clean-up materials (e.g., absorbent pads, etc.) specifically designed for petroleum

products and other hazardous substances where such materials are being stored. F F F F P F N

(viii) Segregate hazardous wastes (oily wastes, used batteries, fuel drums) and ensure that storage, transport and

disposal shall not cause pollution and shall be undertaken consistent with national and local regulations. F F F F P F N

(ix) Ensure all storage containers are in good condition with proper labeling. F F N N N P N

(x) Regularly check containers for leakage and undertake necessary repair or replacement. F F N N N F N

(xi) Store hazardous materials above flood level. F F P F N F F

(xii) Equipment maintenance and refueling areas shall be provided with drainage leading to an oil-water separator

that will be regularly skimmed of oil and maintained to ensure efficiency. F F N F P F N

(xiii) Discharge of oil contaminated water shall be prohibited. F F F F F F F

Issue:

Solid waste from contractor’s yard and construction camps

Potential impact:

Contamination from solid waste

(i) Solid wastes/garbage will be collected in bins and disposed of regularly to sites approved or licensed by local authorities, according to a brief and basic waste management plan prepared by the contractor and approved by DSC, prior to the commencement of civil works.

F F F F F F F

(ii) Prohibit burning of construction and domestic wastes. F F F F F F F

(iii) Do not permit disposal of solid wastes into canals, rivers, other watercourses, agricultural field and public areas. Disposal shall only be to areas approved/licensed by local authorities.

F F F F F F F

(iv) Properly collect and segregate solid wastes at worker camps and construction sites. Use rubbish bins for containing domestic solid wastes

F F F F F F F

(v) Segregate reusable and recyclable wastes. F F F F P F F

(vi) All worn out parts, equipment and empty containers of hazardous substances (oil, paint, lubricant, bitumen, etc.) must be removed from the site to a proper storage location designated by PMU/DSC.

F F F F F F N

(vii) There will be no site-specific landfills established by the contractors. All solid waste will be collected and removed from the work camps and disposed in local waste disposal sites.

F F F F F F F

6. Ecological Environment

Issue:

Flora

(i) A tree-cutting and replanting scheme will be prepared within the first four months of the start of civil works to

compensate for cleared areas during construction. N F F N

N

N N

(ii) Orientation will be provided to the workers on proper implementation of mitigation measures to protect the F F P N P F F

Page 6 of 10

APPENDIX A

Issue/Potential Impact Mitigation DSC-02 DSC-01

CW-01 CW-02 CW-05 CW-06 CW-07 CW-08 CW-11

Potential impact:

Damage to vegetation

environment.

(iii) The contractor shall prohibit cutting of trees for firewood and for use in for construction-related activities F F F F F F F

(iv) Vegetative cover (e.g., grasses and shrubs) stripped from the construction sites will be used for landslide and

slope protection. N N N N N F N

(v) Construction vehicles will operate within the corridor of impact, i.e., approximately within ROW, to avoid

damaging soil and vegetation. It will be most important to avoid soil compaction around trees. Generally, the rule

will be to avoid driving heavy equipment or trucks anywhere into the 'drip-line' of a tree (defined as imaginary line

around a tree where rainwater falls freely to ground unimpeded by the tree's foliage).

N N N N F N N

(vi) No trees will be removed without prior approval of Bapedalda. N N N N N N N

(vii) The contractor will not use or permit the use of wood as a fuel for the execution of any part of the Works,

including but not limited to the heating of bitumen and bitumen mixtures, and to the extent practicable shall

ensure that fuels other than wood are used for cooking, and water heating in all his camps and living

accommodations

F F F F F F F

(viii) Contractor shall not buy or use wood from the illegal sources (that come from the illegal logging) F F F F F F F

(ix) No construction camps, asphalt mixing plants, material storage sites are to be located in the forest areas. F F F F F F F

(x) Contractor will take all precautions necessary to ensure that damage to vegetation is avoided due to fires

resulting from execution of the works. The Contractor will immediately suppress the fire, if it occurs, and shall

undertake replanting to replace damaged vegetation.

F F N N N N N

Issue:

Fauna

Potential impact: mpact on Fauna

(i) Workers shall be prohibited from hunting wild animals. F F F F F F F

(ii) As much as possible, bridge works will be scheduled in dry season to minimize adverse impacts to fishery, river

water quality and other aquatic resources. F N N F F F N

7. Socio-Economic, Health & Safety of Workers and the Public

Issue:

Local road

Potential impact:

Traffic obstructions, disturbance

and damage to local road, irrigation

canals and other community

facilities

(i) In coordination with local traffic officials, schedule transport of materials to avoid congestion, set up clear traffic

signal boards and traffic advisory signs at the roads going in and out the road and bridge construction sites to

minimize traffic build-up.

F F N F F F N

(ii) As much as possible, schedule delivery of construction materials and equipment during non-peak hours. F F F F F F N

(iii) Provide safe vehicle and pedestrian access around construction areas. N N N N F N N

(iv) Provide adequate signage, barriers and flag persons for traffic control. F F P F F F N

(v) Provide sufficient lighting at night within and in the vicinity of construction sites. N F N N F N N

(vi) Inform the public (e.g., through community consultation and newspaper announcements, etc.) regarding the scope

and schedule of construction, as well as certain construction activities causing disruptions or access restrictions. F F N P F F N

(vii) All existing roads will be maintained in traffic worthy condition and uninterrupted movement of traffic will be F F F F F F N

Page 7 of 10

APPENDIX A

Issue/Potential Impact Mitigation DSC-02 DSC-01

CW-01 CW-02 CW-05 CW-06 CW-07 CW-08 CW-11

maintained.

(viii) If necessary, traffic will be diverted for safe and smooth movement of vehicles to ensure smooth traffic flow and

minimize accidents, traffic hold ups and congestion. N N F F F F N

(ix) The diversion signs would be bold and clearly visible particularly at night. N N F P F P N

(x) Safe access to all the roadside properties will be provided and properly maintained along construction sites. F F N N F N N

(xi) Temporary bypasses will be constructed and maintained (including dust control) during the construction period

particularly at bridge crossings. N F F F F F N

(xii) A grievance redress committee will be formed in association with affected population before starting the civil work

and advance notice must be given to the community about the construction schedule. F F N N F N N

(xiii) Access roads damaged during transport of construction materials and other project-related activities shall be

reinstated upon completion of construction works at each section. F F N N F N N

(xiv) Damaged irrigation canals and other community facilities shall be immediately repaired and/or adequate

compensation paid to affected parties. N N N N F N N

Issue:

Compensation for land use & trees

Potential impact:

Social instability and deforestation

(i) Fair and timely compensation shall be implemented based on the Land Acquisition and Resettlement Plan

prepared in accordance with GOI and ADB requirements. F F F F N F F

(ii) In the approaches to villages and settlements, road side vendors will be advised in advance the schedule of

construction. N N N F F N N

Issue:

Community involvement

Potential impact:

Stresses in the community

(i) The contractor will provide temporary worksite facilities such as health care, eating space, and praying places. N N N N N N N

(ii) Establish grievances redress committee. F F N N F N N

(iii) Contractors shall make use of local labor, as much as possible. F F F F F F N

Issue:

Cemetery and Graveyard

Potential impact:

Social grievances

(i) Graveyards and holy places are the cultural and religious relics involve in this Project and these will be protected

and respected. N N N N N N N

(ii) Awareness campaigns for the education of road users on the importance of the culturally sensitive sites normally help to preserve them. Improved road signage and awareness display boards will be placed at the religiously sensitive sites. These will alert construction workers and road users. During construction, extreme precautions will be taken to ensure that cemetery and religiously sensitive places are protected and respected. It is highly recommended that contractors consult with local people during civil works close to these sites.

N N F F F F F

(iii) Alert concerned district or provincial authorities on discovery of any objects of possible archaeological significance

that may be uncovered during construction. N N N N F N N

(iv) Immediately suspend construction activities affecting the area of the find until a qualified site assessment has been

made and contractors have been given permission by the concerned authority to proceed.

(v) Any material of historical importance found during

N N N N N N N

(vi) the clearing operations, like treasure trove, slabs with epigraphical evidence or edicts, or sculptures, will be handed N N N N N N N

Page 8 of 10

APPENDIX A

Issue/Potential Impact Mitigation DSC-02 DSC-01

CW-01 CW-02 CW-05 CW-06 CW-07 CW-08 CW-11

over to the government.

Issue:

Contract procedures and specifications

Potential impact:

Faulty construction

(i) Contractors’ conformity with contract procedures and specifications during construction will be carefully monitored. P F F F F F P

(ii) Main contractors are responsible for ensuring that sub-contractors conform to general construction guidelines (good

engineering practice and standard good working practices). Otherwise, the quality of works subcontracted will be

poor. F F F F F F F

(iii) Contractors will be made to follow standard construction practices, monitored, and supervised by construction

supervision consultants. P F P P F P P

Issue:

Health & Safety of workers and the community

(i) Prior to initiating site works, the contractor will present a simple sewage management plan to the DSC for approval. P P P P F P P

(ii) All toilet facilities will be at least 300m from water sources or existing residences. F F F F F F F

(iii) Discharge of untreated sewage shall be prohibited. F F F F F F F

(iv) Conduct orientation for construction workers regarding health and safety measures, emergency response in case of

accidents, fire, etc., and prevention of HIV/AIDS and other related diseases. F F F F F F F

(v) Provide first aid facilities that are readily accessible by workers. F F F F F F F

(vi) Provide fire-fighting equipment at the work areas and at construction camps. F F F F F F F

(vii) Provide adequate drainage at all construction areas and workers camps, to avoid creation of stagnant water bodies

and accumulation of water in old tires, etc. F F F F F F F

(viii) Provide adequate housing for all workers at the construction camps. F F F F F F F

(ix) Provide reliable supply of potable water that meets national standards for drinking water. F F F F F F F

(x) Provide separate hygienic sanitation facilities/toilets and bathing areas with sufficient water supply for male and

female workers. F F F F F F F

(xi) Establish clean canteen and cooking areas.

(xii) Ensure proper collection and disposal of solid wastes consistent with local regulations. P P P P P P P

(xiii) Contractor will not hire children. F F F F F F F

(xiv) Provide construction personnel with necessary self-protection devices, such as safety helmet, earplug, safety

shoes, goggles, and other appropriate safety protection devices. F F F F F F F

(xv) Set up enclosures at construction sites, excavation areas and other dangerous places to restrict public access. F F F F F F N

(xvi) Ensure reversing signals are installed on all construction vehicles. F F F F F F F

(xvii) Transport and storage of explosives shall be consistent with national regulations. N N N N N N N

(xviii) Blasting shall be under careful and strict management of properly trained and licensed personnel. N N N N N N N

(xix) In blasting operations, confirm that the quantity of explosives is rational and set safe and warning distances as per N N N N N N N

Page 9 of 10

APPENDIX A

Issue/Potential Impact Mitigation DSC-02 DSC-01

CW-01 CW-02 CW-05 CW-06 CW-07 CW-08 CW-11

quantity of explosives.

(xx) Observe proper warning and precautionary measures to ensure safety of residents, pedestrians, motorists and

structures during blasting. N N N N N N N

Issue:

Health & Safety of workers and the community

Potential impact:

Contamination and odor from sanitary waste

(i) Construction and work sites will be equipped with sanitary latrines that do not pollute surface waters and contractors

will submit a simple sewage management plan; All work sites will be equipped with latrines. P P P P F P P

(ii) The construction camps will have rationing facilities particularly for kerosene/LPG so that dependence on firewood

for cooking is avoided to the extent possible. F F F F F F F

Page 10 of 10