Environmental Safeguard Monitoring Report - adb.org · Lingkungan Hidup) ANDAL Indonesian...

Environmental Safeguard Monitoring Report

2018 Annual Environmental Monitoring Report November 2018 Part 1 of 2: [Main Report]

INO: Loan 2817- Regional Road Development

Project

Prepared by Project Management Unit, Directorate of Road Network Development, for the

Directorate General of Highways, Ministry of Public Works and Housing and the Asian

Development Bank.

NOTES

(i) The fiscal year (FY) of the Government of Indonesia ends on 31 December. FY before a calendar year denotes the year in which the fiscal year ends, e.g., FY2011 ends on 31 December 2011.

(ii) In this report, "$" refers to US dollars. This environmental safeguard monitoring report is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area.

REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA

MINISTRY OF PUBLIC WORKS AND HOUSING

DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF HIGHWAYS

DIRECTORATE OF ROAD NETWORK DEVELOPMENT

TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE FOR SUPPORT OF

PROJECT MANAGEMENT UNIT OF REGIONAL ROADS DEVELOPMENT PROJECT

UNDER: ADB LOAN NUMBER 2817-INO AND IDB FINANCING NUMBER IND-0161

2018 ANNUAL ENVIRONMENTAL

MONITORING REPORT

(January - September 2018)

Joint venture between:

RENARDET S.A. CONSULTING ENGINEERS

In association with

PT. Multi Phi Beta

PT. Widya Graha Asana

PT. Disiplan Consult

PT. Anugerah Kridapradana

2018 Annual Environmental Monitoring Report (AEMR)

Regional Roads Development Project (RRDP)

i

ABBREVIATIONS

ADB Asian Development Bank

AMDAL Indonesian Environmental Impact Assessment (Analisis Mengenai Dampak

Lingkungan Hidup)

ANDAL Indonesian Environmental Impact Statement (Analisis Dampak Lingkungan

Hidup)

BLHD Regional Environmental Agency (Badan Lingkungan Hidup Daerah)

CTC Core Team Consultant

DSC Design and Supervision Consultant

DGH Directorate General of Highway (Direktorat Jenderal Bina Marga)

Dinas PU Provincial Public Works Agency (Dinas Pekerjaan Umum Provinsi)

EMP Environmental Management Plan

EMMP Environmental Management and Monitoring Plan (the checklist issued by DGH

as part of the contract specification)

GOI Government of Indonesia

GRM Grievance Redress Mechanism

IEE Initial Environmental Examination

MPWH Ministry of Public Works and Housing

PIU Project Implementation Unit

PMU Project Management Unit headed by the Director of Road Networks

Development Directorate

RKL Indonesian Environmental Management Plan (Rencana Pengelolaan

Lingkungan)

RPL Indonesian Environmental Monitoring Plan (Rencana Pemantauan Lingkungan)

RRDP Regional Roads Development Project

SDERS Sub-Directorate of Environmental Affairs and Road Safety

SPPL Statement letter to commit conducting environmental management and

monitoring (Surat Pernyataan Kesanggupan Pengelolaan dan Pemantauan

Lingkungan Hidup)

UKL-UPL Indonesian Environmental Management Effort and Environmental Monitoring

Effort Document (Upaya Pengelolaan Lingkungan - Upaya Pemantauan

Lingkungan)



ii

TABLE OF CONTENTS

TABLE OF CONTENTS .................................................................................................. II

LIST OF TABLES .......................................................................................................... III

LIST OF FIGURES ......................................................................................................... III

APPENDICES ................................................................................................................ III

PART I. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................... 1

1.1. Project Background.............................................................................................. 1

1.2. Objectives and Scope of the Monitoring Report ................................................... 1

PART II. ROAD CONSTRUCTION PROGRESS IN 2018 ............................................ 3

PART III. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN................................................... 5

3.1. Roles and Responsibilities ................................................................................... 5

3.2. EMP Implementation by Executing Agencies ....................................................... 9

3.3. EMP Implementation by DSC ............................................................................ 10

3.4. EMP Implementation by Contractors .................................................................. 12

3.5. Public Consultations and Grievance Redress Mechanism ................................. 13

PART IV. ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING .............................................................. 14

4.1. Environmental Approval and Permit for Road Construction ................................ 14

4.2. Environmental Approval and Permit for AMP and Quarry/Borrow Pit ................. 14

4.3. Monitoring Results ............................................................................................. 15

4.3.1 Ambient Air Quality .................................................................................................... 16

4.3.2 Noise Monitoring Data ............................................................................................... 17

4.4. Environmental Monitoring by the DSC ............................................................... 18

PART V. CTC SITE INSPECTION .............................................................................. 24

PART VI. KEY ISSUES FOR RESOLUTION ............................................................... 27

PART VII. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ............................................ 28



iii

LIST OF TABLES

Table 1: Contract Work Packages Completed in 2018 .................................................................... 4

Table 2: EMP Implementation by the DGH, SDERS, PMU, and CTC ............................................ 9

Table 3: EMP Implementation by the DSC .................................................................................... 11

Table 4: Contractor’s EHS Personnel for Ongoing Projects in 2018 ............................................. 12

Table 5: Environmental Approval and Permit of Road Sections (as of September 2018) ............ 14

Table 6: Environmental Approval and Permit for AMP and Quarry (as of September 2018) ........ 15

Table 7: Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Results for CW-01, Central Java ................................... 16

Table 8: Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Results for CW-05, West Kalimantan ............................ 16

Table 9: Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Results for CW-11, North Kalimantan ............................ 17

Table 10: Noise Monitoring Results ............................................................................................... 18

Table 11: Environmental Monitoring Undertaken by DSC ............................................................. 19

Table 12: Non-Compliance/Issues Identified, Corrective Action and Its Status as of 2018 .......... 25

Table 13 : Key Issues and Required Corrective Actions ............................................................... 27

LIST OF FIGURES

Figure 1: RRDP Organizational Structure – National Government Level ........................................ 6

Figure 2: RRDP Organizational Structure – West Kalimantan ........................................................ 7

Figure 3: RRDP Organizational Structure – North Kalimantan ........................................................ 7

Figure 4: RRDP Organizational Structure – Central Java ............................................................... 8

Figure 5: Grievance Redress Mechanism ..................................................................................... 13

APPENDICES

Appendix A Implementation of Environmental Mitigating Measures – Construction Phase

Appendix B CW-01 Quarry Environmental Approvals and Permits

Appendix C Air Quality and Noise Monitoring Results for CW-01, CW-05 and CW-11

Appendix D CW-01 Site Closure Reports and Related Documents

- Validity sheet PT. PP Persero - Environmental Mitigation site Closure - Minutes of Meeting Join Inspection for Confirmation of AMP, Quarry and Base Camp -

Site Map Quarry and Base Camp CW-01 - Picture Evidence for Confirmation of Site Closer - Contactor's Statement Letter about Operation of AMP and Quarry is still on-going - Statement letter from community

Appendix E CW-08 Site Closure Reports and Related Documents

- Picture Evidence of Confirmation of Site Closure - DSC-1 Letter about AEMR Action Plan - Asphalt Drum request by Local Community member

Appendix F CW-09 Site Closure Reports and Related Documents

- Picture Evidence of Confirmation of Site Closure



iv

- DSC-1 Letter about AEMR Action Plan - Environmental Permit of Stone Crusher and AMP Plant, Kabupaten Bulungan - Contractor Letter about discontinuity of Base Camp, AMP and Quarry - Contractor Letter about discontinuity of AMP

Appendix G CW-10 Site Closure Reports and Related Documents

- Picture Evidence of Confirmation of Site Closure - DSC-1 Letter about AEMR Action Plan - Contractor Letter about discontinuity of AMP

Appendix H CW-11 Site Closure Reports and Related Documents

- Minutes of Meeting (Berita Acara 29 June 2018) : - Handing Over of Base camp from Halla Corporation to PT. Daya Mulia Turangga - Handing over of AMP, Heavy Equipment from Halla Corporation to PT. Daya Mulia

Turangga - Handing over of stock piles, Jetty Material from Halla Corporation to PT. Daya

Mulia Turangga - Statement Letter from Contractor that AMP will not be used anymore for work package

CW-11 - Photographs of Closed Site - Statement Letter from community that there was no negative environmental impact as

result of the operation of the AMP, base camp and road construction of CW-11 - Statement Letter from Contractor that empty asphalt drums were used for fencing of

base camp and as water containers for watering of palm trees - Request letter from community for empty asphalt drums; and pictures of how they were

used



1

PART I. INTRODUCTION

1.1. Project Background

1. The Regional Roads Development Project (RRDP) is financed through a Project Loan

from the Asian Development Bank (ADB) and the Islamic Development Bank (IDB). The

executing agency of the RRDP is the Directorate General of Highways (DGH), known as

Direktorat Jenderal Bina Marga (Ditjen Bina Marga) of the Ministry of Public Works and

Housing (MPWH) also known as Kementerian Pekerjaan Umum dan Perumahan Rakyat.

The public works and public housing sectors were merged and became MPWH since

October 2014.

2. The RRDP aims to improve important national and strategic road corridors in Northern

Kalimantan and Southern Java to encourage economic growth in these two (2) less

developed areas of Indonesia. The rehabilitation, capacity expansion and construction of

new roads will improve connectivity and access to services in the above-mentioned

provinces. Improved road infrastructure in southern Java is necessary for increased

economic growth to increase access to markets and attract investment in that area. Road

network development in Kalimantan will promote economic and regional development in

currently less developed and remote areas. Further, it will improve access of poor rural

and minority villages to income generating opportunities and social services, particularly in

North Kalimantan.

3. The RRDP consists of eleven (11) construction work (CW) packages/sub-projects,

including rehabilitation, improvement or construction of about 476 km of roads and

bridges distributed in four (4) provinces of Indonesia, namely West Kalimantan, North

Kalimantan, Central Java, and East Java. Further, the works include rehabilitation or

replacement of bridges equal to approximately 3.9-km long and construction of 40.0-km

long of new roads along agricultural areas where there are existing earthen tracks in

some sections.

4. Most of the civil works under the RRDP includes widening and partial reconstruction of

the existing road of more than 400-km long to a minimum width of 6 m with some minor

deviations. All subproject roads are designed as 2-lane and 2-way roads, which consist of

6-m carriage ways plus 2 x 1-m hard shoulder and 2 x 1-m side ditch. New alignment has

also been constructed along existing tracks and/or delineated areas. Rehabilitation,

asphalt pavement, and widening works have been undertaken on existing substandard 2-

lane gravel or asphalt roads which are strategic to meet the national highway standards.

1.2. Objectives and Scope of the Monitoring Report

5. The main objectives of this Annual Environmental Monitoring Report (AEMR) are to

briefly present the progress of RRDP in a period of January to September 2018, marking

completion of the RRDP construction. This report analyzes environmental mitigation and

monitoring activities implemented in this period. Further, the status of corrective actions

undertaken in response to non-compliances identified by Core Team Consultant (CTC)

site inspections for the mentioned period in 2018 is updated in this report, including

community complaints and Grievance Redress Mechanism (GRM) conducted, if any. This



2

2018 AEMR is the final environmental monitoring report submitted for the implementation

phase of the RRDP.

6. This 2018 AEMR is prepared based on data and information that are extracted and

analyzed, as available, from: Design and Supervision Consultant (DSC) Monthly

Environmental Reports for the mentioned period; corresponding Core Team Consultant

(CTC) Environmental Specialist Site Visit Reports; and correspondences and verbal

communication among the contractors, DSC, and CTC. In particular, the environmental

mitigation and monitoring described in this AEMR are based on available evidence and

assessed against each aspect detailed in the EMP of the IEE (approved 2011), which is

the key environmental document for the RRDP. The Core Team Consultants (CTC),

comprising Renardet S.A. Consulting Engineers in association with PT. Multi Phi Beta,

PT. Widya Graha Asana, PT. Disiplan Consult, and PT. Anugerah Kridapradana, have

prepared this 2018 AEMR.

7. The contents presented in the 2018 AEMR include:

Part I Introduction

Part II Road construction progress in 2018

Part III Environmental mitigation measures

Part IV Environmental monitoring

Part V CTC site inspection

Part VI Key issues for resolution, and

Part VIII Conclusions.



3

PART II. ROAD CONSTRUCTION PROGRESS IN 2018

8. As of September 2018, all CW packages finished construction works. These are:

Central Java

CW-01 Tambak Mulyo-Wawar completed on 24 September 2018

West Kalimantan

CW-05 covering: Sosok – Tayan and Tanjung - Batas Kota Sanggau as schedule completed on 13 June 2018, but was 95% complete at end of September 2018.

North Kalimantan

CW-08 covering: Tanjung Selor - Simpang Tiga Tanjung Palas, and Simpang Tiga Tanjung Palas - Sekatak Buji (Section 1) completed on 30 January 2018

CW-11 covering: Simpang Tiga Apas -Simanggaris (Section-2) and Simanggaris – Border (Batas Negara, Serudong) completed on 30 June 2018

9. Based on this, the length of road sections has been changed with a total length of

486.08 km (out of 476 km planned) which includes 501.80 meters of bridges (out of 3.9

km planned) have already been completed. The changes in the road and bridge lengths

during project implementation were due to: a) slight changes in length of some road

sections due to re-measurement, b) changes to road alignment and specifications for

CW-07 (in West Kalimantan) to avoid passing through the protection forest, c) addition

of a new road section, CW-06: Sambas-Tanjung Harapan (12.3 kms.) in West

Kalimantan, and, d) changes in the road alignments for CW-11 Simpang Tiga Apas -

Simanggaris (Sect.-2) and Simanggaris – Batas Negara (Serudong) in North Kalimantan.

The respective project activities of the CW packages for 2018 are presented in Table 1

.



4

Table 1: Contract Work Packages Completed in 2018

Package No. Road Section Total Length

(km) Contractor Activities and Progress as of September 2018

Central Java

CW-01 Tambak Mulyo – Wawar 38.46 Joint operation of PT Pembangunan

Perumahan (Persero) and PT

Armada Hada Graha

Project completed in September 2018. Works in 2018 covered:

embankment and side drainage works

spreading of Class S aggregate

spreading of AC-WC

installation of road signs and markers

improvement of foundation for Pier-1 and Pier-2 with boulder and geotextile

West Kalimantan

CW-05

Sosok – Tayan 41.60 Joint operation of PT Yasa Patria

Perkasa and PT Budi Bakti Prima

Project completed in June 2018. Works in 2018 covered:

embankment and side ditch works

spreading of Class S aggregate for shoulders

stone masonry and concreting works for retaining wall

pavement marking

Tanjung - Batas Kota Sanggau 37.60

North Kalimantan (This area was part of East Kalimantan Province prior to 2013)

CW-08

Tanjung Selor - Simpang Tiga

Tanjung Palas, and Simpang

Tiga Tanjung Palas - Sekatak

Buji (Section 1)

34.82 PT Waskita Karya Project completed in January 2018. Works in 2018 covered:

spreading of aggregate class S,

installation of road signs and road marking,

pouring of concrete for retaining wall.

spreading of Asphalt Cement-Base Course (AC-BC) and

Asphalt Cement-Wearing Course (AC-WC)

spreading of embankment/shouldering works

CW-11

Simpang Tiga Apas -

Simanggaris (Section-2)

27.15 Halla Corporation Project completed in June 2018. Works in 2018 covered:

spreading of common embankment

preparatory v-ditch works

spreading of class S aggregates for shoulders

spreading of AC-BC and AC-WC

stone masonry works for retaining wall.

Road marking and guard rail works

Simanggaris – Border (Batas

Negara, Serudong)

20.80



5

PART III. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN

3.1. Roles and Responsibilities

10. There were no changes to the executing agency, contractors and consultants of

RRDP. The DGH is the executing agency responsible for the overall RRDP

implementation and has established the Project Management Unit (PMU) headed by the

Director of the Directorate Road Networks Development. Its function is to facilitate land

acquisition, resettlement, and environmental mitigation. An Officer in Charge has been

designated for the PMU to oversee day-to-day activities and prepare progress reports.

The PMU is assisted by the Core Team Consultant (CTC). The PMU in coordination with

the Project Implementation Units (PIU) and Sub-directorate for Environmental and Road

Safety (SDERS) of the Directorate Road Networks Development ensures that the

environmental management (mitigation and monitoring) plan (EMP) is implemented. The

Design and Supervision Consultants (DSCs) are required to conduct monitoring of the

EMP implemented by the Contractors and submit the corresponding monthly

environmental report to the DGH/PMU and CTC. Figure 1 presents the RRDP

organization structure at the national level.

11. Figure 2 to Figure 4 present the RRDP organization structure in West and North

Kalimantan as well as in Central Java. The RRDP implementation in East Java was

completed in 2016 and therefore no longer described in the 2018 AEMR. During the

construction stage, the Contractors, under the supervision of the DSCs, are primarily

responsible for EMP implementation of their respective CW packages. The DSCs

appointed for the RRDP are:

DSC-1: China Engineering Consultants, Inc., for the CW packages (CW-05 to CW-11)

in West and North Kalimantan; and

DSC-2: Botek Bosphorus Technical Consulting Corp., for the CW packages (CW-01

to CW-03) in Central Java.

12. The DSCs should prepare and submit the monthly environmental reports to the

DGH/PMU and CTC. The CTC appointed for the RRDP is Renardet S.A. and its joint

venture partners. Based on the monthly environmental reports submitted by the DSCs,

the PMU/DGH with the assistance of the CTC prepares the Semi-Annual/Annual

Environmental Monitoring Report (SAEMR/AEMR) for review and disclosure at ADB’s website.



6

Figure 1: RRDP Organizational Structure – National Government Level



7

Figure 2: RRDP Organizational Structure – West Kalimantan

Figure 3: RRDP Organizational Structure – North Kalimantan



8

Figure 4: RRDP Organizational Structure – Central Java



9

3.2. EMP Implementation by Executing Agencies

13. The EMP of RRDP implemented by the DGH, SDERS, PMU, and CTC is reported in

Table 2. The category used to report the implementation status of the EMP is as follows:

“Implemented” meaning that the agencies have primarily performed and/or

accomplished their EMP responsibilities.

“Partially Implemented” meaning that the agencies have put some or partial efforts to

implement the EMP responsibilities and in some cases in an informal manner (without

documentation).

“Not implemented” meaning that the agencies have not implemented the EMP

responsibilities.

“Not applicable” meaning that the EMP responsibility of the agencies is no longer

relevant due to changes in their mandates or the project is already in the different

phases.

Brief justifications are also described for each of the status assigned in the table below.

Table 2: EMP Implementation by the DGH, SDERS, PMU, and CTC

Agency / Roles and Responsibilities Status as of 2018

Directorate General of Highways (DGH) as the Executing Agency/Project Director

Direct and supervise the Project

Management Unit (PMU)

Implemented – direction and supervision were conducted

through official memoranda and instructions.

Ensure that sufficient funds are available to

properly implement EMP.

Implemented - the cost of implementing the EMP is

included in the unit price of all pay items included in the

contract and deemed as full compensation for

environmental management of RRDP.

Ensure that EMP provisions are

implemented for the entire Project regardless

of financing resources.

Implemented - EMP provisions are integral part of the

General Specifications of the contracts awarded to RRDP

contractors.

Ensure that Project implementation complies

with the GOI and ADB’s environmental policy principles and requirements.

Implemented – implementation with these regards are

reported in the form of checklist and monthly report by

contractors and DSCs.

Ensure that tender and contract documents

include the EMP.

Implemented – EMP is included as part of the

specification of the contract document signed by the

Contractors.

Establish a grievance redress mechanism

(GRM) as described in the IEE

Implemented – GRM is established as part of the RRDP

(described elsewhere in this report).

Submit semi-annual monitoring reports

(SAEMR) on EMP implementation to ADB.

Implemented – semi-annual environmental monitoring

reports and annual environmental monitoring reports

were submitted to ADB.

Sub-directorate of Environmental and Road Safety (SDERS) responsible for environmental and

social monitoring

Set procedures for environmental

management and monitoring based on GOI

and ADB requirements.

Partially Implemented – these procedures were

established by requiring the road construction works,

asphalt mixing plant and quarry operations to secure with

ANDAL and RKL-RPL approvals, UKL-UPL approval, and

Environmental Permit as required by prevailing



10

Agency / Roles and Responsibilities Status as of 2018

Indonesian laws and regulations.

Coordinate with PMU to ensure that the EMP

is implemented properly and that required

monitoring and reporting are undertaken as

required.

Implemented – coordination was conducted through both

official communication and regular consultation.

Coordinate with BLHD offices at the District,

City, and Provincial Levels with regard to

compliance of the Project to GOI

environmental requirements.

Partially Implemented – coordination between SDERS

and local/provincial environmental agencies were

undertaken on ad hoc basis in relation to UKL-UPL

approval and Environmental Permit related to the road

sections of RRDP in CW-06, and therefore

documentation with this regard was scarcely produced.

Project Management Unit (PMU) provides day-to-day project management of RRDP

Include the EMP in tender and contract

documents.

Implemented - through the inclusion of Section 1.17

Environmental Safeguards in the RRDP Contract General

Specifications.

Ensure that EMP provisions are strictly

implemented during various project phases.

Implemented – through regular official site visits to each

CW package and site coordination with PPK, Satker

(working unit), and contractor concerned to environmental

mitigation and submission of official site visit reports.

Undertake monitoring of the implementation

of the EMMP (mitigation and monitoring

measures) with assistance from DSC.

Implemented - through site inspections undertaken by

PMU.

Ensure that DSC prepared monthly reports,

environmental monitoring reports for

submission to PMU/CTC.

Implemented - through DSC Monthly Environmental

Monitoring Report submission to PMU.

With support from CTC, prepare semi-annual

environmental monitoring reports for

submission to ADB.

Implemented - semi-annual and annual environmental

monitoring reports were submitted to ADB.

Core Team Consultants (CTC) provides project management support to PMU

Prepare semi-annual reports on EMP

implementation (mitigation measures,

establishment of ambient baseline data

baseline, ambient monitoring, etc.) based on

the monthly monitoring reports submitted by

DSC.

The semi-annual environmental monitoring

reports shall be submitted to ADB through

DGH/PMU.

Implemented - semi-annual and annual environmental

monitoring reports were submitted to ADB via DGH/PMU.

Develop an environmental auditing protocol

for the construction period for DSC’s guidance.

Implemented – through the use of EMMP as

environmental auditing instrument for the construction

period.

3.3. EMP Implementation by DSC

14. Table 3 presents the status of the DSCs on their responsibility in implementing the

EMP. The criteria used to determine the implementation status of the EMP are the same

as those used in Table 2. For this report and the succeeding environmental monitoring

reports, the status for DSC-3 is not presented since it has already been demobilized in



11

May 9, 2016 after the lone CW package under its supervision, CW-04, finished

construction activities in 2016.

15. The EHS engineer of DSC-2 previously mobilized in September 2017 has already

resigned in February 2018 while the EHS engineer of DSC-1 is still on the project. Be that

as it may, there are still EMP responsibilities of both DSC-1 and DSC-2 that remain either

partially implemented or not implemented.

Table 3: EMP Implementation by the DSC

Responsibilities DSC – 1: China Engineering Consultants Inc. (West and

North Kalimantan)

DSC – 2: Botek Bosphorus Consulting (Central Java)

Undertake regular monitoring of the

contractor’s implementation of the environmental mitigation measures

specified in the EMP

Partially Implemented –

environmental monitoring were

partially undertaken.

Partially Implemented - the

EHS engineer resigned in

February 2018. There is

improvement in environmental

monitoring reports that were

submitted to the PMU/CTC

Prepare monthly environmental

monitoring reports for submission to

DGH/PMU and CTC. Such reports

shall be the basis for the semi-

annual environmental monitoring

reports to be prepared by CTC for

submission to ADB.

Partially Implemented – the

monthly environmental

monitoring reports were

submitted by DSC to

PMU/CTC in the form of

checklist without adequate

supporting documents.


observation of DSC-2 with this

regard is the same as that of

DSC-1.

Engage an accredited/licensed

laboratory or institution to undertake

establishment of baseline data on air

quality, noise, and surface water

quality prior to commencement of

site works based on the EMMP.

Prepare corresponding reports for

submission to DGH/PMU and CTC.

Not applicable – since the

project was already in

construction phase in 2016,

and therefore environmental

baseline data was no longer

required.

Not applicable – the



DSC-1.

Engage an accredited/licensed

laboratory or institution to conduct

sampling during construction phase

and in response to complaints or

when there are pollution events.

Prepare corresponding reports for

submission to DGH/PMU and CTC.

Implemented – air quality and

noise monitoring were

conducted by CW-05 and CW-

11 and the results were

presented in this report.

CW-08 finished construction

works in January 2018 which

did not give ample time for the

3rd

party provider to conduct

the sampling considering the

remoteness of the project site.

Implemented - air quality and

noise monitoring were

conducted by CW-01 and the

results are presented in this

report.

Review and approve the specific

environmental management plans

(Dust Suppression Program,

Sewage Management Plan, Solid

Waste Management Plan) to be

prepared by the contractors as

specified in the EMP

Not implemented - no specific

management plans as required

has been prepared by the

contractors.

Not implemented - the



DSC-1.



12

Responsibilities DSC – 1: China Engineering Consultants Inc. (West and

North Kalimantan)

DSC – 2: Botek Bosphorus Consulting (Central Java)

Provide on-the-job training to PU

Office, P2JN staff, provincial and

district DGH staff as well as to

province and district environmental

staff on monitoring of contractor's

environmental performance and

preparation of monitoring reports

Not implemented – no

evidence that this activity has

been undertaken.

Not implemented - the



DSC-1.

Supervise civil works to ensure

compliance with the EMP


DSC site engineer provides

limited supervision on EMP

compliance.




DSC-1.

Recruit an EHS manager who will be

responsible in ensuring that

environmental mitigation measures

specified in the EMP are

implemented properly

Partially Implemented – there

is an EHS engineer but there

is no proof that environmental

mitigation measures are

implemented properly


EHS engineer resigned in

February 2018.

Implement and provide sufficient

funding and human resources for

proper and timely implementation of

required mitigation measures in the

EMP

Partially Implemented - funding

and human resources were

provided for EMP

implementation, but this was

inadequate as mitigation

measures were partly

implemented.




DSC-1.

Review and approve environmental

assessment reports required by the

Government.


environmental assessment

reports required for the project

were handled by the proponent

and SDERS.


environmental assessment

reports required for the project

were handled by the proponent

and SDERS.

Undertake monitoring of the project’s environmental performance based

on their mandate

Implemented – the DSC site

engineer monitored the project

environmental performance

and reported in the DSC’s monthly report submitted to

PMU/CTC.

Implemented - the observation

of DSC-2 with this regard is the

same as that of DSC-1.

3.4. EMP Implementation by Contractors

16. Table 4 presents the EHS personnel of the remaining Contractors for the RRDP

construction works in 2018. These contractors are responsible for the EMP

implementation of the road construction, AMP and quarry operations.

Table 4: Contractor’s EHS Personnel for Ongoing Projects in 2018

Package / Road Section (Contractor) EHS Personnel

Central Java

CW-01: Tambak Mulyo – Wawar

(PT Pembangunan Perumahan & PT Armada Hada Graha) Muhammad Iso



13

Package / Road Section (Contractor) EHS Personnel

West Kalimantan

CW-05: Sosok – Tayan; and Tanjung – Batas Kota

(PT Yasa Patria Perkasa & PT Budi Bakti Prima) Juliusman Laia

North Kalimantan

CW-08: Tanjung Selor - Intersection Tiga Tanjung Palas; Intersection Tiga

Tanjung Palas - Sekatak Buji (Section 1) (PT Waskita Karya)

Dhika Fatkhur Rakhman,

Fahrial

CW-11: Simpang Tiga Apas - Simanggaris (Section 2); and Simanggaris –

Batas Negara (Serudong) - (Halla Corporation) Sugiyana

3.5. Public Consultations and Grievance Redress Mechanism

17. No public consultations were conducted and also no public complaints formally

reported with regard to RRDP implementation in 2018. Nevertheless, the Grievance

Redress Mechanism (GRM) has been established as per Figure 5 below to address

public complaints or concerns related to the project, if any.

Figure 5: Grievance Redress Mechanism



14

PART IV. ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING

4.1. Environmental Approval and Permit for Road Construction

18. As of September 2018, the AMDAL and UKL-UPL approval and the Environmental

Permit remain incomplete for few sections of CW-06 as presented in Table 5, whereas

the road construction of this package has been completed in December 2017.

Table 5: Environmental Approval and Permit of Road Sections (as of September 2018)

Package / Road Section Status

CW-06 in West Kalimantan

Tebas - Singkawang Section 1

(previously Singkawang overlay)

Length: 3.60 km

AMDAL approval No. 154/BLHD/2013 (dated 18 February

2013) granted by the Governor of West Kalimantan.

However, there is no record indicating whether the

corresponding Environmental Permit has been granted. Tebas - Singkawang (Section 2)

Length: 26.20 km

Sambas Bypass

Length: 6.10 km

There is no record indicating whether the UKL-UPL approval

and Environmental Permit for this road section exist.

4.2. Environmental Approval and Permit for AMP and Quarry/Borrow Pit

19. The asphalt mixing plants (AMP) and quarries/borrow pits owned/managed by the

RRDP contractors are required to secure UKL-UPL approval and Environmental Permit

from respective local environmental agency and/or local government. The status of these

approvals and permits as of September 2018 is presented in Table 6.

20. CW-01, CW-08 and CW-09 presented the environmental approval and

environmental permit for their quarry and AMP (please see Appendix B, E and

F). No evidences whether the UKL-UPL approval and environmental permit of the quarry

and AMP for CW-03 (Central Java), CW-04 (East Java) and CW-10 (North Kalimantan)

exists as of September 2018.



15

Table 6: Environmental Approval and Permit for AMP and Quarry (as of September 2018)

CW Package/Road Section Status

Asphalt Mixing Plant Quarry/Borrow Pit

Central Java UKL-UPL

approval

Environmental

Permit

UKL-UPL

approval

Environmental

Permit

CW-01: Tambak Mulyo – Wawar Secured Secured Secured Secured

CW-02: Giriwoyo - Duwet Secured Secured Secured Secured

CW-03: Wawar – Congot Secured None None None

East Java

CW-04: Jolosutro – Sendang Biru None None None None

West Kalimantan

CW-05: Sosok – Tayan; Tanjung –

Batas Kota Sanggau

Secured Secured Secured Secured

CW-06: Tebas – Singkawang

(Sections 1 and 2); Sambas bypass;

Sambas – Tanjung Harapan; Galing

– Tanjung Harapan


CW-07: Intersection Tanjung –

Galing; Aruk – Intersection Tanjung


North Kalimantan

CW-08: Tanjung Selor – Intersection

Tiga Tanjung Palas – Sekatak Buji

(Section 1)


CW-09: Intersection Tiga Tanjung

Palas – Sekatak Buji (Section 2)

None Secured None Secured

CW-10: Intersection Tiga Apas –

Simanggaris (Sections 1 and 2)

None None Not applicable as the

quarry material is

purchased from elsewhere

CW-11: Simpang Tinga Apas -

Simanggaris – Batas Negara

(Serudong)

SPPL (instead of UKL-UPL and

Environmental Permit) secured

Not applicable as the quarry

material is purchased from

elsewhere

4.3. Monitoring Results

21. There were four CW packages with ongoing construction works in 2018 required to

conduct an annual ambient air quality and semi-annual noise level monitoring. Three CW

packages conducted this monitoring. The results of this monitoring are described in the

following paragraphs. However, the lone CW package that did not conduct the

monitoring, CW-08, finished construction activities in January 2018 which did not give

enough time for the hiring and conduct of sampling by the 3rd party provider considering

the remote location of the project site. However, quality test results of ambient water, air

and noise tests conducted in 2017 have been provided.



16

22. There were no complaints on water pollution reported in 2018, and therefore no water

quality sampling is required according to the IEE of RRDP (2011).

4.3.1 Ambient Air Quality

23. The ambient air quality monitoring results and corresponding interpretation for the

ongoing CW packages in Central Java, West Kalimantan and North Kalimantan (for 2018)

are described in the following paragraphs. The Government Regulation No. 41 of 1999

(GR 41/1999) on Air Pollution Control stipulates threshold values of selected air pollutant

parameters and are used as the reference for interpreting the analytical results presented

herein.

24. Central Java: CW-01. One-hour sampling of ambient air quality was conducted at

CW-01 at the Luk Ulo bridge construction site, and the samples were analyzed for total

suspended particulates (TSP) and particulate matter (PM10) as required by the IEE of

RRDP. The sampling location is located near residential areas. Vehicular traffic in this

area is minimal since this is a new road alignment and is still closed to motorists. The GR

41/1999 stipulates the threshold value of TSP and PM10 for 24-hour sampling is 230

µg/Nm3 and 150 µg/Nm3 respectively, but there is no stipulation for 1-hour sampling.

Therefore, the analytical results presented in Table 7 only provide a brief condition of the

TSP and PM10 concentration at a particular time and location within the road alignment.

25. For CW-01, the TSP and PM10 concentration of 21.11 µg/Nm3 and 29.33 µg/Nm3

respectively, were measured for 1-hour sampling at the specified sampling point and

these results are well below the threshold value stipulated in GR 41/1999.

Table 7: Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Results for CW-01, Central Java

No Road Section / Sampling Point (Sampling Date) TSP (µg/Nm3)1 PM10 (µg/Nm

3)1

CW-01: Tambak Mulyo – Wawar (Sampled on 17 April 2018)

1 Luk Ulo Bridge STA 17+250 21.11 29.33

Note: 1No threshold concentration of TSP and PM10 stipulated for 1-hour sampling in GR 41/1999.

26. West Kalimantan: CW-05. CW-05 conducted ambient air quality sampling for TSP

and PM10. It was not specified in the analytical results whether this sampling was

conducted for 1-hour or 24-hour period. The corresponding analytical results are

presented in Table 8.

27. At CW-05, the TSP and PM10 concentrations measured at three locations in 2018

were below the threshold value of 230 µg/Nm3 and 150 µg/Nm3, for TSP and PM10

respectively as stipulated in GR 41/1999

Table 8: Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Results for CW-05, West Kalimantan

No Road Section / Sampling Point (Sampling Date) TSP (µg/Nm3) PM10 (µg/Nm

3)

CW-05: Sosok – Tayan; Tanjung – Batas Kota Sanggau (Sampled 9 June 2018)

1 Aggregate Blending Plant in Bodok 118 99.7



17


3)

2 Quarry area `near house of Warga in Bunut 63.5 42.1

3 Sosok – Tayan road section 122 106

28. North Kalimantan: CW-11. CW-11 conducted 1-hour ambient air quality sampling for

TSP in front of the contractor’s compound where the AMP is also located. As shown in

the map, the area is sparsely populated with the few residences located nearby. As

previously mentioned, GR 41/1999 stipulates the threshold value of TSP for 24-hour

sampling as 230 µg/Nm3, but there is no stipulation for 1-hour sampling. Therefore, the

analytical results presented in Table 9 only provide a brief condition of the TSP

concentration at a particular time and location.

29. For CW-11, the TSP concentration of 36.45 µg/Nm3 measured for 1-hour sampling at

the specified sampling point is well below the threshold value of 230 µg/Nm3 stipulated in

GR 41/1999. No sampling result was presented for PM10.

Table 9: Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Results for CW-11, North Kalimantan


3)

CW-11: Simanggaris – Batas Negara (Serudong) (Sampled 6 April 2018)

1 Infront of contractor’s (Halla Corporation) offices 36.45 -

4.3.2 Noise Monitoring Data

30. The noise monitoring results for Central Java, West Kalimantan and North Kalimantan

CW packages are presented in Table 10, and are interpreted as follows:

31. Central Java: CW-01. The results of the noise sampling at Station 1: Luk Ulo bridge

shows that the noise level of 69.1 dB(A) is within the standard of 70 dB(A) as stipulated in

Ministry of Environment Decree No. Kep-48/MENLH/11/1996 on Ambient Noise

Standards. There is very minimal vehicular traffic and therefore the exceedance can be

attributed mainly to the ongoing construction works at the bridge.

32. Noise sampling result for Station 2 of 75.1 dB(A) is slightly above the standard of 70

dB(A). Since the Tambak Mulyo-Wawar road is still closed to traffic, the increase in noise

levels are mainly due to the heavy equipment operation and ongoing road construction

works.

33. West Kalimantan: CW-05. The results of the noise level measurements for CW-05

indicate that the noise levels for all 3 sampling stations are slightly higher than the

standard of 70 dB(A). For station 1 and 2, the sampling stations are located at the

entrances of the contractor’s facilities and are near the road. Thus, the sources of noise

are mainly the operation of the plants (AMP and stone crusher and asphalt blending),

trucks transporting materials to and from the plants and vehicular traffic. For station 3, the



18

noise comes from both vehicular traffic and the operation of equipment for construction

works.

34. North Kalimantan: CW-11. The ambient noise sampling result for CW-11 of 67 dB(A)

is within the standard. The noise sampling station is inside the contractor’s camp located

in a sparsely populated area. Thus, the main source of noise is the trucks hauling

materials and the AMP operation.

Table 10: Noise Monitoring Results

Station Road Section / Sampling Point Noise level [(db)A]

Central Java - CW-01: Tambak Mulyo-Wawar

sampled in 17 April 2018

1 Luk Ulo Bridge STA 17+250 69.1

2 Road alignment: Tambak Mulyo-Wawar STA 38+00 75.1

West Kalimantan - CW-05: Sosok – Tayan; Tanjung – Batas Kota Sanggau

sampled in November 16, 2018

1 Entrance to contractor’s camp, AMP and stone crusher compound in Bunut

74.2

2 Entrance to Asphalt Blending Plant in Bodok 75.6

3 Along Tanjung-Sanggau road section 72.7

CW-11: Simanggaris – Batas Negara (Serudong)

Sampled in March 7, 2018

1 In front of contractor’s (Halla Corporation) offices 67

Note: Ministry of Environment Decree No. Kep-48/MENLH/11/1996 on Ambient Noise Standards: Residential area: 55 dB(A); Commercial/industrial area: 70 dB(A)

4.4. Environmental Monitoring by the DSC

35. DSC-2 reported that their environmental engineer/specialist has already resigned in

February 2018. However, it was noted that whilst the DSC-1 have still an environmental

engineer/specialist in their employ, the monthly Environmental Monitoring reports

containing the related checklists prepared by the contractors were still not supported by

site inspection, monitoring reports or photographs. On the other hand, the monthly

environmental monitoring reports submitted by DSC-2 contained some environmental

monitoring and mitigation activities with photographs.

36. In view of this deficiency, the actual observations of the CTC during the site visits and

ad-hoc communication between the PMU/CTC, DSC and contractors were applied to

present the overall status of the environmental monitoring conducted by the DSC for the

RRDP. Based on these information and observations, the status of environmental

monitoring conducted by DSC is categorized as ‘implemented, partially implemented, not

implemented or not applicable as presented in Table 11.



19

Table 11: Environmental Monitoring Undertaken by DSC

Aspect / Location Parameters Monitoring Means/

Frequency Guideline Values/Standards/

Indicators Status in 2018 and Justifications

1. Quarries and borrow operation

Quarry and borrow

sites

Undertaken in

designated areas duly

licensed/ approved by

concerned authority.

Monthly visual

inspection to ensure fill

is only obtained from

licensed designated

sites

(i) Environmental permit/

approval from concerned

agency.

Implemented –All UKL-UPL approval and Environmental

Permit for the quarries operated to support the construction

works in 2018 have been secured.

(ii) Activities shall be limited to licensed designated areas only.

Implemented –All UKL-UPL approval and Environmental Permit for the quarries operated to support the construction works in 2018 have been secured.

Quarry and borrow sites

Implementation of erosion control

Monthly visual inspection

(i) No evidence of water ponding or presence of fresh gullies.

Implemented – quarry and borrow sites are already existing and not owned by the contractors and are/should be monitored by GOI mandated agencies.

(ii) No increased visual turbidity of surface water.

Implemented – the same justification as for point (i).

Quarry and borrow sites

Proper site closure as specified in the environmental mitigation plan.


(i) Pre-quarry conditions Implemented –pre-quarry conditions are typically documented in the UKL-UPL document. Quarry and borrow sites are already existing and not owned by the contractors and will continue to operate after the project.

(ii) Site left in a tidy state with stable side slopes, proper drainage and provided with vegetation cover.

Implemented –pre-quarry conditions are typically

documented in the UKL-UPL document. Quarry and borrow

sites are already existing and not owned by the contractors

and will continue to operate after the project

(iii) DSC’s report testifying to completion of restoration work

Implemented – the same justification as for point (ii).



20





2. Material storage sites

Project alignment, construction yard

Compliance with requirements


(i) Activities shall be limited to designated areas only

Implemented – the activities are delineated as part of construction activities.

(ii) Materials management procedures implemented.

Partially Implemented – Total site closure reports submitted are 8 of 11 CW packages but only 5 of 11 CW packages have proper site closure reports and

(iii) No visible puddles of oil or oil contaminated soil.

Partially Implemented – Total site closure reports submitted are 8 of 11 CW packages but only 5 of 11 CW packages have proper site closure reports

4. Landslide/Rockfall

Active landslide/ rock fall sections and steep mountainous slopes

Vegetation cover is maintained.

Monthly visual Inspection

(i) Identified areas during detailed design phase.

Implemented – areas for vegetation cover is identified and included in the contract for some CW packages.

(ii) Adequacy, quality, and specifications of planting; Survival rate of plants.

Not implemented – there is no data available as to the actual survival rate of plants since only the planting is included in the contract.

Slope stabilization engineering structures

Slope stabilization measures, landslide/ rockfall protection measures


Adequacy, quality, and specifications of landslide/rock fall protection measures.

Implemented – construction of landslide/rock fall protection measures are completed as per contract.

5. Hydrocarbon and chemical storage

Construction camps

Compliance with environmental mitigation requirements

Monthly visual Inspection of storage facilities

Provision of adequate storage facilities

Partially Implemented – Only 5 out of 11 CW packages have site closure reports which certified by DSC submitted indicating that storage facilities for lubricant, fuel and asphalt drums have been cleaned-up.

Material storage areas of the CW packages with construction works in 2018, for hydrocarbon materials have concrete flooring with embankment and roof.



21





6. Waste management

Construction camps

Cleanliness of workers’ camps


(i) Proper collection, storage, and disposal of solid waste.

Partially Implemented – storage and disposal of solid wastes is implemented but needs improvement.

(ii) Provision of clean and adequate sanitation facilities.

Partially Implemented – sanitation facilities are provided but maintenance needs improvement.

Proper site closure


(i) Timely and effective waste disposal.

Partially Implemented –8 out of 11 CW packages submitted site closure reports certified by DSC submitted).

(ii) Site appearance restored. As above

(iii) DSC’s report testifying restoration of site.

As above.

7. Surface water quality

Bridge construction sites

Local surface waters are protected

Monthly visual inspection of water management

(i) Project activities do not cause turbidity/siltation and flow obstruction of surface waters.

Implemented – no public complaints were received or reported about surface water.

(ii) Adequacy, quality, and specifications of protection measures provided against washouts.

Implemented – protection measures such as retaining walls were provided at the time of bridge construction and included in contract.

All bridge construction sites – upstream and directly downstream of major rivers or after a pollution event

(i) Total suspended solids (TSS)

(ii) Oil and grease,

(iii) Turbidity,

(iv) pH

Water sample collection and analyses by accredited laboratory

(i) once before commencement of construction works (baseline); and

(ii) subsequently after a reported pollution event and/or complaints)

Standardization of River Categories II based on Governmental Regulation No. 82 of 2001

Not applicable –There are no reported water pollution events or community complaints. The IEE of RRDP only requires water sampling if these conditions exist.



22





8. Air quality

Sensitive sites e.g. settlements, schools, hospitals, etc., close to construction sites and other project-related facilities where emission of high dust levels occur

(i) TSP

(ii) PM10

Air sample collection and analyses by accredited laboratory

(i) once before commencement of construction works; and

(ii) subsequently 1 time a year

Government Regulation No. 41 of 1999 on Air Pollution Control

Partially Implemented-3 of 4 CW packages with construction works in 2018 conducted air quality sampling.

CW-08 completed in January 2018 and did not allow enough time to prepare and conduct the sampling through a 3

rd party

provider considering also the remote location of the project.

CW-11 analyzed TSP parameter only.

Asphalt mixing plant Designated areas

Monthly visual inspection to ensure asphalt plant is located >1 km from residential areas

i) Environmental approval/permit from concerned agency.

Implemented – All CW packages with ongoing works in 2018 have secured UKL-UPL approval, Environmental Permit and SPPL.

ii) Activities shall be limited to designated areas only

Implemented - activities are limited to designated areas inside the asphalt mixing plant compound.

Dust

Compliance with required mitigation measures

Monthly visual inspection to ensure dust suppression work plan is being implemented

i) Measures, location, and schedule for dust suppression activities

Implemented – dust suppression activities were implemented, and no complaints were received.

ii) Air pollution control

equipment installed on

vehicles

Implemented – the construction vehicles have installed air

pollution control in their exhaust system.

iii) No complaints from

residents

Implemented - no formal complaints were received from

residents.

9. Noise

Sensitive areas

Noise levels in dB(A)

Noise level measurement:

(i) Once before commencement of construction activities; and

(ii) Subsequently twice per year

i) Government Regulation No. 41 of 1999 on Air Pollution Control.

Implemented-3 of 4 CW packages with construction works in 2018 conducted noise sampling.

CW-08 completed in January 2018 and did not allow enough time to prepare and conduct the sampling through a 3

rd party

provider considering also the remote location of the project.

ii) Complaints from residents Implemented - no complaints were received from residents.



23





10. Vibration

Sensitive areas

Compliance with required mitigation measures


Complaints from residents Implemented - no complaints were received from nearby residents.

11. Landscaping/Reforestation

Project alignment

Progress of reforestation activities


i) Adequacy, quality, and specifications of planting

Not implemented – this guideline is not specified in the construction contract of RRDP.

ii) Survival rate of plants Not implemented – this guideline is not specified in the construction contract of RRDP.

iii) Watchman on site Not implemented – this guideline is not specified in the construction contract of RRDP.

12. Community

Project alignment

(i) Consultations

(ii) Information disclosure

Ongoing consultation with government and community groups along the alignment to monitor environmental concerns

(i) Number of public consultations conducted

Partially implemented – informal communication was reportedly made with local residents prior to start of construction activities.

(ii) Recipients of project-related documents

Partially implemented - project related documents are only for contractor and local government

(iii) Number of complaints Implemented - no community complaints were reported in 2018

13. Traffic management

Project alignment

(i) Number of complaints

(ii) Number of traffic enforcers in place

(iii) Number of traffic and warning signs in place

Ongoing visual inspection to strict adherence to applicable environmental mitigation measures

Number of complaints and accidents

Implemented – no complaints were received. Traffic signs are in place as per specification in the contract.



24

PART V. CTC SITE INSPECTION

37. There was no ADB Project Review Missions conducted during the RRDP

implementation in the period of January to September 2018 as the project has been

officially completed as of end September 2018. However, a Project Closure Review

Mission is reportedly scheduled for October 2018.

38. The CTC International and National Environmental Specialists conducted

environmental monitoring in Central Java, West Kalimantan and North Kalimantan CW

packages. Key non-compliances with the IEE of RRDP identified at these site inspections

including corresponding corrective actions and its implementation status are presented in

Table 12.

39. In general, there were only a few key issues identified during the CTC site visits.

However, since only 8 of 11 CW packages have submitted site closure/hand-over reports

i.e. : CW-01, CW-02, CW-06, CW-07, CW-08, CW-09, CW-10 and CW-11, it cannot be

determined if proper site closure, clean-up activities and proper disposal of spilled asphalt

and petroleum-based products were implemented.



25

Table 12: Non-Compliance/Issues Identified, Corrective Action and Its Status as of 2018

Package Non-Compliance/Issue Identified by Corrective Actions Status

Central Java

CW-01 The new road alignment is still closed to motorists, but some locals already use the road in going to their farms exposing them to road construction hazards.

CTC Improve installed road/warning signs at

beginning and end of new road

alignment.

Implemented- Road/warning signs improved to forewarn

and dissuade motorists from entering the closed road. Site

closure report with clean-up photographs has already been

submitted. Please see Appendix E.

CW-01 Not all workers are wearing PPEs. CTC Implement wearing of PPEs as required

in the contract and EMP

Implemented- Field personnel are instructed during

toolbox meetings to wear PPEs

CW-01 Previous concern on replacement of trees which has been cut along the project alignment.

CTC The contractor has already planted 3,000 albizia trees

along the project alignment.

West Kalimantan

CW-05 Workers are not wearing PPEs. No warning signs and flagmen during asphalt paving. The work area is a busy thoroughfare.

CTC Implement wearing of PPEs. Install

appropriate road signs/warning signs as

specified in the contract and EMP.

Implemented- Warning signs and flagman were immediately provided at working areas.

CW-05 Dense dust during stone crushing operations. Wind direction is observed to be downward towards the vegetated areas and away from settlements.

CTC Implement water spraying of source

aggregates and conduct air quality

monitoring as soon as possible to

ascertain dust pollution levels

especially near sensitive

receptors/residences.

Implemented- Air quality monitoring conducted on June 9, 2018 at the entrance to the stone crusher plant and quarry which is beside residential areas showed TSP and PM10 results of 63.5 µg/Nm

3 and 42.1 µg/Nm

3 respectively

which were below the threshold value of 230 µg/Nm3 and

150 µg/Nm3, for TSP and PM10 respectively as stipulated in

GR 41/1999 (please see Appendix C.2).

North Kalimantan



26

Table 12: Non-Compliance/Issues Identified, Corrective Action and Its Status as of 2018

Package Non-Compliance/Issue Identified by Corrective Actions Status

CW-11 The old bridge and construction debris at

Bridge Sta 12 + 600 has not yet been

removed and may cause obstruction to

the free flow of water.

CTC Remove debris and perform clean-up

activities.

Implemented - the old bridge has already been removed in

coordination with the PPK for the equipment to be used for

removal of the bridge and transfer to the contractor’s base camp.

CW-11 Thick white smoke which was darker than

usual was observed coming out of the

AMP stack. Air quality sampling was

already conducted on April 6, 2018 but the

results were not yet available at the time

of the site visit.

CTC Conduct air quality monitoring as soon

as possible to determine pollution

especially since the sensitive

receptors/residences are beside the

contractor’s camp.

Implemented - Air quality monitoring conducted on April 6,

2018 at the contractor’s camp and AMP compound showed

TSP values of 36.45 µg/Nm3 which is below the threshold

value of 230 µg/Nm3 as stipulated in GR 41/1999. Please

see Appendix C.3.

CW-11 Minimal diesel spills were observed below

the diesel tank. Asphalt spills were

observed at the vicinity of the asphalt

mixing plant.

CTC Despite the small volume, these should

still be cleaned up regularly to avoid

water pollution downhill when it rains

since the AMP area is located at a

higher elevation.

Implemented – Site closure report with clean-up

photographs have already been submitted. Please see

Appendix D.



27

PART VI. KEY ISSUES FOR RESOLUTION

40. Table 13 summarizes the key issues identified in 2016, 2017 and 2018 (as of

September 2018) that should be resolved by the parties identified. Issues or gaps

regarding the EMP implementation that are described in the earlier tables should also be

resolved since it is noted that some of the key issues have been recurring since 2015.

Table 13 : Key Issues and Required Corrective Actions

Key issues as of

September 2018 Corrective Action

Responsible

Party

Status (as of

September 2018)

Incomplete

environmental

approval and

permits for the

road construction

The Environmental Permit (Izin

Lingkungan) of CW-06: Tebas -

Singkawang - Section 1 and Section 2

The UKL-UPL approval and

Environmental Permit of CW-06:

Sambas Bypass road section

Directorate

General of

Highways

Acquisition of

environmental

approvals and

permits are in

progress

Absence of

environmental

approval and

permits for AMP

and/or Quarry

Provide evidences that the environmental

approval and permits for the quarry and

asphalt mixing plant (AMP) have been

acquired and include in the site closure

report of completed road package CW-04

DSC-3 (PT

Perentjana

Djaja)

Not Available as

DSC-3 has been

demobilized and

construction

completed on 9

April 2016





report of completed road package CW-03.

DSC-2 (Botek

Bosphorus

Technical

Consulting)

Environmental Site

closure report is

not available. The

AMP operations

are currently being

forwarded by other

project. The

material of quarry

was purchased by

contractor as

reported by DSC





report of completed road packages CW-09,

and CW-10.

DSC-1 (China

Engineering

Consultants)

Not implemented,

Contractors have

demobilized in

2017 and AMPs

have been closed.

Proper site

closure report and

compliance to

Government

Regulation No

101/2014 on the

management of

hazardous/toxic

wastes

Identify final disposal method for waste

asphalt and empty asphalt drums, used oil

and other waste petroleum-based products

that comply with the mentioned regulation

and include in site closure report.

Contractors for

CW-03, CW-04,

CW-05, CW-08,

CW-09 and CW-

10

DSC-1 and

DSC-2 to certify

proper site

closure report

Partially

implemented,

DSC-1 preparing

site closure for

Work Packages

CW-08, CW-09

and CW-10 (see

appendices F, G,

H) and for CW-05

construction not

completed yet.



28

PART VII. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

41. This 2018 Annual Environmental Monitoring Report describes the implementation on

environmental management plan (mitigation and monitoring) by the Executing Agency,

including respective contractors, DSCs, and PMU/CTC, as integral part of the execution

of RRDP. The 2018 report serves as the final environmental monitoring report covering

January to September 2018, which is the completion date of the RRDP. The key

conclusions drawn from this report are presented in the following:

42. Implementation of Environmental Management Plan including Monitoring.

Incomplete environmental checklists, including the absence of its supporting information

and documents (e.g., written justification, inspection reports, and photos) is ongoing issue

encountered until the project completion.

43. The DSC-1 (for Kalimantan) and DSC-2 (for Central Java) have only mobilized their

Environmental Specialists since September 2017. The DSC-2 Environmental Specialist

resigned thereafter in February 2018 and DSC-1 Environmental Specialist will be

demobilized until end of DSC-1 contract.

44. The implementation of corrective actions and environmental mitigating measures by

the contractors improved compared to that in the previous years, particularly for CW-01

(Central Java), CW-05 (West Kalimantan), and CW-08 and CW-11 (North Kalimantan)

completed in 2018. The improvements included, among others:

Dust suppression measures such as water spraying and maintenance of construction

facilities and equipment as well as AMP’s air pollution control devices were more

regularly conducted.

Air quality sampling for total suspended solids and particulate matters (PM10), and

noise monitoring were conducted for the works packages constructed and completed

in 2018. The monitoring results indicate values that are generally within the threshold

values stipulated by the Indonesian Government.

Relatively small quantities of spilled asphalt, and other hydrocarbon materials remain

at the AMP. Spilled asphalt is reused for improving village roads and contractor’s camp

areas. Used oil are reused for equipment maintenance while minimal quantities of

spilled oil are collected and used as cooking fuel.

Empty drums formerly used to storage asphalt and hydrocarbon materials for the

RRDP works in West Kalimantan were reportedly collected back by the supplier and

shipped to a central drum collection entity in Pontianak. In contrast, those of the RRDP

works in North Kalimantan are reportedly donated to the local governments and local

villagers for limited use such as collecting water for watering palm trees or used for

fencing. There is no information as to how these empty drums have been managed for

the RRDP works in Central and East Java.

The AMPs equipped with settling pond with concrete flooring were visually monitored

and the sludge accumulated was regularly removed.

No significant and formal complaints were received during the project execution.



29

45. Approval and Permit for Road Construction. At the end of the RRDP completion,

most of the roads constructed/operated under the RRDP have secured their respective

AMDAL and UKL-UPL approvals as well as the Environmental Permit, except for the

Sambas – Tanjung Harapan and Tebas – Singkawang road sections (CW-06 in West

Kalimantan).

46. Approval and Permit for Asphalt Mixing Plant (AMP) and Quarry. At the end of

the RRDP completion, most of the AMPs and quarries road operated under the RRDP

have secured their respective UKL-UPL approvals and Environmental Permits or SPPL.

However, there is no information whether those of CW-03 (Central Java), CW-04 (East

Java), and CW-09 and CW-10 (North Kalimantan) have been secured.

47. Site closure/hand over reports of the AMPs and/or quarries operated for the RRDP

have been submitted for 8 out of 11 CW packages, and these are for CW-01, CW-02,

CW-06, CW-07, CW-08, CW-09, CW-10 and CW-11 as included in the 2017 and 2018

environmental monitoring reports. Similar reports have not been submitted for the other

CWs.

48. Recommendations. The gaps as described earlier should be completed as part of

the project closure report and RRDP monitoring for the operation phase.

49. The Environmental Management Plan of the RRDP’s IEE (2011) requires the DGH/Dinas PU to conduct a regular environmental monitoring of the roads for the first

three years of operation. Subsequently, an annual monitoring report should be submitted

to ADB.

Environmental Safeguard Monitoring Report - adb.org · Lingkungan Hidup) ANDAL Indonesian...

Documents

Transcript of Environmental Safeguard Monitoring Report - adb.org · Lingkungan Hidup) ANDAL Indonesian...