RESULTSOF THE NATIONAL CONSULTATIONS ON POST-

2015 AGENDA IN THE KYRGYZ REPUBLIC

May 6, 2013

Djunushaliev M.T.National institute for strategic studies

of the Kyrgyz Republic

What are the national consultations?

Period:• January, 2012 - April, 2013 – in Kyrgyzstan

• Up to 1 year – in the other countries

Purpose

• wide discussion on the "Development Agenda in Kyrgyzstan after 2015"

• building a global vision of “the future we want”

• impact on intergovernmental processes in the development after 2015

2010 -MDG

SummitRio +20

UN System Task Team

SG's High-level Panel

of Eminent Persons

Working Group on

Sustainable Developme

nt Goals

Adoption of the post-2015

UN development

agenda

What are the national consultations?

The results of the national consultations

Report of the National Consultations

• April 2013

Summit ofUN

member-states

September2013

Intergovernmental process and discussions

on the development agenda post 2015

End of 2013 – 2014

UN System Task Team: Proposed integrated framework for realizing the “the future we want for all" in the post-2015 UN development agenda

Human rights

Equality

Stability

Environmental Sustainability

Peace

and security

Inclusive

social

development

Inclusive economic

development

The area of the national consultations

Inclusive economic development

Economic growth and employment

Food security and agriculture

Environmental Sustainability

Energy

Water

Environmental sustainability

Inclusive

social

development

Demographic dynamics

Healthcare

Education

Family as an institution

Inequality

Peace

and security

Governance

Conflicts and instability

Values

Methodology of the national consultations

Government sector

Civil society

Scientific and expert community

Private sector

Average household

Migrants (internal and external)

Families of migrant workers

Small scale traders + small business +

small farmers

Women (heads of households, farms)

Ethnic minorities

Community groups

Older people

Teachers, doctors

International organizations

Youth (14-28 years)

Children (from 5 to 7 years and under 14

years)

Stateless persons

Refugees

Workers in the informal sector

People with disabilities. Families living

people with disabilities

Groups, directly or indirectly affected by

conflict and / or natural disasters + border

communities

Unemployed

Members of PLHIV community and key

populations at higher risk (IDU, SW, LGBT)

Base questions of the national consultations

How do you want to see the future of Kyrgyzstan in 15 years? Name three areas

Why do you consider these three areas important?

What do you need to do to achieve this? What's stopping you?

Who can help to achieve it?

What can you do for this?

Gathered more than 20.000 responses

1. By selective interviews

2. In focus group discussions

3. Interviewing experts and

individual members of key

groups at higher risk

5. Survey via social networks

653 respondents

382 respondents took part in 27 FGDs

Interviews were included in Nation-wide

Survey, FDGs, on-line Survey

54 respondents

750 respondents, unique respondents –

596 users

4. On-line survey via emails +

web survey tools

Total participants: 1 685 respondents

National Consultation Coverage

FGDs Geographical coverage

PLHIV, IDUs, SC, LGBT– 16Youth under 14 лет – 15

Ethnic groups– 15Families of migrant workers - 12

Women as the heads of households – 14Community groups– 17

Cross-boarder population – 13

Affected by conflict - 26Food insecure population – 10

Children up to 5 years– 15Small business– 14

Average households - 20

Aged people – 16PLHIV, IDUs, SC, LGBT – 17

Trade Unions – 18Работодатели - 10Unemployed – 17

refugees– 12informal sector workers– 16

ethnic groups– 16migrants - 14

People with disabilities + their families - 14

Public employees - 17

Youth 12-14 years - 14Stateless persons– 17

Farmers- 15

General characteristics of the respondents

EducationВысшее

Более 1 высшего образованияСреднее специальноеПолное среднее

Неполное среднее

Gender

Male (52%)

Female (48%)

Ethnics

Kyrgyz (55%)

Russians (20%)

Uzbeks (12%)

Others (12%)

Responses correlation with Areas

1Economic growth and employment

2Food security and agriculture

3 Energy4 Water

5Environmental sustainability

6 Demographic dynamics7 Healthcare8 Education9 Family as an institution

10 Inequality

11 Governance

12 Conflicts and instability13 Values0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13

Responses correlation within Nation-wide Survey and FGDs

1Economic growth and employment

2Food security and agriculture

3 Energy4 Water

5Environmental sustainability

6 Demographic dynamics7 Healthcare8 Education9 Family as an institution

10 Inequality

11 Governance

12 Conflicts and instability13 Values0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13

Responses correlation within on-line (e-mail)+ web survey

1Economic growth and employment

2Food security and agriculture

3 Energy4 Water

5Environmental sustainability

6 Demographic dynamics7 Healthcare8 Education9 Family as an institution

10 Inequality

11 Governance

12 Conflicts and instability0

50

100

150

200

250

300

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

Responses correlation within Social Media channels

1Economic growth and employment

2Food security and agriculture

3 Energy4 Water

5Environmental sustainability

6 Demographic dynamics7 Healthcare8 Education9 Family as an institution

10 Inequality

11 Governance

12 Conflicts and instability0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

Thank you for your attention!