Energy Deposition in the New IRs
description
Transcript of Energy Deposition in the New IRs
31/07/08 Review new IRs: Energy Deposition
1
Energy Deposition in the New IRs
Francesco Cerutti, Marco Mauri, Alessio Mereghetti, Ezio Todesco, Elena Wildner
AB/ATB and AT/MCS
With contributions from: Frank Borgnolutti, Jens Bruer, Alfredo Ferrari, Christine Hoa, Vasilis Vlachoudis and others
31/07/08 Review new IRs: Energy Deposition
2
Outline
Triplet Upgrade Parametric approach
The Art of Binning Results
Peak energy deposition Influence of interconnections Total loads Particle Fluences
Conclusions (Part 1)
110 mm aperture case: power deposition and dose in TAS Triplet and corrector package D1 TAN D2
Part One:General aspects triplet
Part Two:A Shielding Option: thick Liner in Q1
Part Three:Particle fluences in electronics locations
UJ56 Conclusions (Part 2 and 3)
31/07/08 Review new IRs: Energy Deposition
3
The Triplet, Parametric Approach
Aperture(mm)
Gradient(T/m)
L(Q1,Q3)(m)
L(Q2a,b)(m)
Total length (m)
90 156 8.69 7.46 36.2
115 125 9.98 8.42 40.7
130 112 10.81 9.04 43.6
140 104 11.41 9.49 45.7
Total Length
Q1 Q2a Q2b Q3
“Symmetric”
IP1
TAS
No Corrector in tripletHalf Crossing angle 225 rad, vertical TAS aperture 55 mm
Max (cable length)
Actual gradient: 215 T/m
TAS at 19 m, Q1 at 23 m (like actual)
31/07/08 Review new IRs: Energy Deposition
4
The Magnet Cross Section
31/07/08 Review new IRs: Energy Deposition
5
Parameter Space for Parametric Study
Q1 Positioned at 23 m from the IP
Gaps between magnets 1.3 m Impacts the peak in energy deposition we get on the
following magnet
Symmetric triplet All magnets have the same aperture All magnets have the same gradient Q1 and Q3 have the same length Q2 is split in two parts of equal length
Magnets have “costheta” design Two layers
We get one family of solutions:(Aperture, gradient, length linked)
Different from latest “New Triplet” layout, small effect
31/07/08 Review new IRs: Energy Deposition
6
Beam pipe/Beam Screen Dimensioning
For the Cold Bore Tube (Beam Pipe): Relation thickness (t) and diameter (D), valid for stainless steel (pressure vessel
code, 25 bar ): t = 0.0272D For the Beam Screen:
Calculations gave the same minimum thickness for all cases (1 mm) we have used 2 mm (similar as for the previous simulations of the upgraded triplet)
Courtesy:G. Kirby, C. Rathjen
Cold Bore Tube and Beam Screen act as shielding. For parametric study: get the minimum necessary thicknesses for the different cases chosen
Aperture [mm]
BP thickness [mm]
BS thickness [mm]
90 2.4 2.0
115 3.0 2.0
130 3.4 2.0
140 3.7 2.0
31/07/08 Review new IRs: Energy Deposition
7
The Scoring for the Triplet Peak power in cable (quench)
We make the binning for the scoring so that it corresponds to a minimum volume of equilibrium for the heat transport (cable transverse dimensions, with a length corresponding to the twist pitch of the cable)
Total power deposited in the magnets (cryogenics) The outer diameter of the magnets (cold mass) is the same
The power deposited per meter of magnet Azimuthal and radial integration of the power in the longitudinal bins
Particle fluence/dose
Transverse area of cable (A)
Scoring volume: A*L
Length (L) 10 cm (twist pitch)
31/07/08 Review new IRs: Energy Deposition
8
The Bins and the Results The indicative value 4.3 mW/cm3 (P. Limon, private
communication) is valid for Rutherford cable in LHC main magnets, including contingency of a factor of 3!
Cable bin
For other cables and magnet designs, this value has to be revised.
For dose calculations (for example cable, insulation and spacers) the bins have to be chosen to get the dose that in reality would damage the bulk material in the object (mechanical and electrical properties)
Insulation
31/07/08 Review new IRs: Energy Deposition
9
Peak Power Deposition I
0
5
10
15
20
25
20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70Distance to IP (m)
Peak
ene
rgy
(mW
/cm
3) 90 mm
110 mm
130 mm
140 mm
Pow
er
100% increase 140 -> 90115
31/07/08 Review new IRs: Energy Deposition
10
Peak Power Deposition IIRescaling longitudinally shows that the pattern is similar! Large effect for Q1 & Q2a
0.0
5.0
10.0
15.0
20.0
Peak
pow
er [
mW
/cm
3 ]
90 mm
115 mm
130 mm
140 mm
Q1 Q2a Q2b Q3
31/07/08 Review new IRs: Energy Deposition
11
Between the Magnets (1)
0.0
5.0
10.0
15.0
20.0
Pea
k p
ow
er [
mW
/cm
3 ]
90 mm
115 mm
130 mm
140 mm
Q1 Q2a Q2b Q3
The gaps between magnets cause a accumulation of non intercepted particles: peaks at the entrance of magnets (particles from IP collisions)
Smaller gaps or shielding of interconnection region interesting
Magnet1 Magnet2
IP
The more smooth pattern is due to the magnetic field (spectrometric effect)
Over all the magnet:Cable 1(red) twice the peaks of cable 2 (blue) => for correctors, for example, use inserts in aperture
31/07/08 Review new IRs: Energy Deposition
12
Between the Magnets (2)
0.0
5.0
10.0
15.0
20.0
Pea
k p
ow
er [
mW
/cm
3 ]
90 mm
115 mm
130 mm
140 mm
Q1 Q2a Q2b Q3
31/07/08 Review new IRs: Energy Deposition
13
0
5
10
15
20
25
80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150Aperture (mm)
Pea
k en
ergy
dep
ositi
on
(mW
/cm
3)
Q1
Q2a
Q2b
Q3
Peak Power Deposition IIILarge effect in Q1 & Q2a small in Q2b and Q3
Pow
er
31/07/08 Review new IRs: Energy Deposition
14
Total Heat Load
0
50
100
150
200
80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150Aperture (mm)
Hea
t loa
d/m
agne
t (W
)
0
125
250
375
500
Tot
al h
eat l
oad
(W)
Q1 Q2aQ2b Q3Beam screen Total
Choice of beam screen thickness: redistribution of heat loads
31/07/08 Review new IRs: Energy Deposition
15
Horizontal/Vertical Crossing
Can we use our results to scale without re-computing?
31/07/08 Review new IRs: Energy Deposition
16
Particle type Distribution, all 4 Magnets Fluence scored in the first cable over each magnet.
Interactions from material inside aperture (Beam Screen and Beam pipe)
Smallest (90mm) and largest (140 mm) aperture will be shown
Particle Fraction [%]
90 mm 140 mm
photons 87.0 86.0
neutrons 6.0 7.8
electrons 3.5 3.3
positrons 2.5 2.3
pions 0.4 0.4
protons 0.15 0.15
31/07/08 Review new IRs: Energy Deposition
17
Neutron Fluence 90mm/140mm
Calculated for 300fb-1 integrated Luminosity
31/07/08 Review new IRs: Energy Deposition
18
Neutron Spectra 90mm/140mm
> 1 MeV neutrons most critical for damage
31/07/08 Review new IRs: Energy Deposition
19
The Triplet Layout as of 30/07/08
110 mm aperture
Parametric study
31/07/08 Review new IRs: Energy Deposition
20
Summary, General Part (1)
The deposited peak power (quench) decreases with the triplet length. Shorter triplets (smaller apertures) need more shielding (takes more aperture).
The decrease with length is largest in Q1 and Q2, where we also have the highest peaks.
The total heat load on the triplet is decreasing (up to 140 mm at least) with length: between 90 and 130 mm aperture we have 16 % less, including the beam screen.
Pattern of energy deposition is similar for all lengths however not identical for the two insertions (1 and 5).
31/07/08 Review new IRs: Energy Deposition
21
Summary, General Part (2)
The distribution of particle types in Q1 is very similar for 90 and 140 mm.
Spectra similar, ~1.5 time higher fluence for 90 mm than for 140 mm aperture
Great care has to be taken for binning in cables for power deposition (quench) and for longevity of objects (dose calculations), studies ongoing
31/07/08 Review new IRs: Energy Deposition
22
ENERGY DEPOSITIONIN THE TAS-D2 REGION
FOR A TRIPLET SHIELDING OPTION(THICK LINER IN Q1)
power values referred to a 2.5 1034 cm-2 s-1 luminosity
time integrated values referred to a 100 fb-1 total luminosity
31/07/08 Review new IRs: Energy Deposition
23
80 MGy/100fb-1
r=1cm x =2o x z=2cm scoring grid
45mm TAS aperture -> 110mm triplet coil aperture
TAS
31/07/08 Review new IRs: Energy Deposition
24
TAS
55mm TAS aperture -> 130mm triplet coil aperture
peak power 114 mW/cm3
total power 325 W
45mm TAS aperture -> 110mm triplet coil aperture
peak power 180 mW/cm3
total power 385 W
34mm TAS aperture
peak power 110 mW/cm3
total power 184 W
present LHC (L=L0) N.V. Mokhov et al.,
LHC Project Report 633
31/07/08 Review new IRs: Energy Deposition
25
TRIPLET AND CORRECTOR PACKAGE
110mm coil aperture
Q1 Q2a
Q2b
Q310mm thick additional
liner
75mm residual aperture
31/07/08 Review new IRs: Energy Deposition
26
TRIPLET AND CORRECTOR PACKAGE
horizontal crossing
8.05 m from the IP face
0.25 m from the IP face
31/07/08 Review new IRs: Energy Deposition
27
TRIPLET AND CORRECTOR PACKAGE
vertical crossing
1.25 m from the IP face 9.55 m from the IP face
31/07/08 Review new IRs: Energy Deposition
28
TRIPLET AND CORRECTOR PACKAGE
r=2.5mm x =2o x z=10cm scoring grid
horizontal crossing
r=2.5mm x =60o x z=10cm scoring grid
mW/cm3
31/07/08 Review new IRs: Energy Deposition
29
TRIPLET AND CORRECTOR PACKAGE
r=2.5mm x =2o x z=10cm scoring grid
r=2.5mm x =360o x z=10cm scoring grid
vertical crossing
mW/cm3
31/07/08 Review new IRs: Energy Deposition
30
TRIPLET AND CORRECTOR PACKAGE
BS includedBS only
BS included
BS only 101 W
+12.9 W in the interconnections
(where BS is supposed to
continue)
in the rest
402 W @ 1.9 K
BS includedBS only
BS included
BS only 98 W
+11.4 W in the interconnections
(where BS is supposed to
continue)in the rest
382 W @ 1.9 K
31/07/08 Review new IRs: Energy Deposition
31
D1
180mm coil aperture
in the warm bore tube
0.9 2.5 W
0.8 1.4 W
31/07/08 Review new IRs: Energy Deposition
32
(present) TAN187 MGy/100fb-1
x=2.5mm x y=2.5mm x z=5cm scoring grid
495 15 6
442 32 3
externaltube
inner Cuabsorber
internaltube
31/07/08 Review new IRs: Energy Deposition
33
(present) TAN
horizontal cuts at beam level
31/07/08 Review new IRs: Energy Deposition
34
no TCTV, TCTH
no TCLP
(present) D2
in the coils (80 mm aperture)
in the coils (80 mm aperture)
31/07/08 Review new IRs: Energy Deposition
35
OVERVIEW
mW/cm3
vertical plane
31/07/08 Review new IRs: Energy Deposition
36
mW/cm3
horizontal plane
OVERVIEW
31/07/08 Review new IRs: Energy Deposition
37
TRIPLET AND CORRECTOR PACKAGE
130mm coil aperture
8/13mm thick
additional liner
Q1 Q2a
Q2b
Q3DC
vertical crossing
31/07/08 Review new IRs: Energy Deposition
38
Concrete shielding blocks
IP5 TAS
Triplet D1
TAN
UJ57
UJ56
courtesy of M. Fuerstner (SC/RP) with contribution of C. Hoa (AT/MCS)
FLUKA model of IR5 (present LHC)
ESTIMATION OF PARTICLE FLUENCESIN ELECTRONICS LOCATIONS
31/07/08 Review new IRs: Energy Deposition
39
In UJ56, after a 2m concrete shielding, the high energy hadron fluence at beam level ranges from 1.3 109 up to 1.3 1010 cm-2/100fb-1
>20 MeV HADRON FLUENCE
vertically averaged over the -60cm < y< 60cm interval (beam axis at y=0)
cm-2/100fb-1
relevant to single event errors
31/07/08 Review new IRs: Energy Deposition
40
UPSTAIRS
vertically averaged over the 220cm < y< 420cm interval (beam axis at y=0)
Upstairs (sensitive electronics) high energy hadron fluence is in the range 1.2 - 3.6 109 cm-2/100fb-1
T. Wijnands
cm-2/100fb-1
31/07/08 Review new IRs: Energy Deposition
41
CONCLUSIONS
•The peak power deposition in the Phase 1 Upgrade triplet SC coils (110-130mm aperture) is expected to be decreased down to the design limit by a 10mm thick stainless steel liner all along the Q1 beam screen, if the interconnection lengths are not increased (unless the liner is extended along the interconnections too). The Q1 liner effectiveness is limited to the first half of the Q2a.Peaks lie on the crossing plane and change their position (up->down, outer->inner) in the Q2a.
•The larger the crossing angle, the higher the peak power density. A magnetic TAS can play a role closing the crossing angle.
•~400 W the triplet toal load + ~100 W in the beam screen (about one half in the Q1 liner).
•Peak dose in the coils to be evaluated over a volume relevant to possible damage to the insulator.
•A corrector package on the non-IP side of a FDDF triplet is more significantly impacted for vertical crossing (peak at -90o in the transverse plane).
•A large aperture SC D1 is not expected to quench.
•TAS and TAN thermomechanical stress to be evaluated from the available power deposition maps.
•Expected high energy hadron fluence in UJ56 (triplet electronics) is worrying for the present LHC at nominal luminosity (with ideal shielding without holes).