EMEP INTENSIVE MEASUREMENT PERIODS IN CLOSE PARTNERSSHIP WITH EU PROJECTS

Wenche Aas , Andres Alastuey, Francesco Canonaco, Fabrizia Cavalli , Franco Lucarelli, Eiko Nemitz, André S.H. Prévôt, Jean-Philippe Putaud, David Simpson, Cathrine Lund Myhre, Xavier Querol, Svetlana Tsyro, Karl Espen Yttri

EMEP intensive measurement periodsTo assist the implementation of the EMEP monitoring strategy. The task force of measurement and modelling (TFMM) has recommended conducting co-ordinated intensive measurements between the Level-2 sites (joint EMEP/GAW supersites). Furthermore, cooperation and involvement of research groups with more advanced research activities (i.e. level 3) has been encouraged

2nd Period

17 Sep – 16 Oct 2008

25 Feb – 26 Mar

2009

3rd Period

8 to July 12(17) 2012

11 jan - 8 Febr 2013

1 st Period

1 - 30 of June 2006

8 Jan -4 Feb 2007

Outline of this talkSome main results from the different measurement periodshighlight the interlink with research projectsHighlight the importance of infrastructure project to develop harmonized

methodology and reporting guidelines in Europe

Intensive measurements 2006/2007

Data available from 2006/2007

Chemical speciation comparison

Measurements of organic carbon is much higher than modeled, especially in winter

Indications of problems with official emission estimates

Not complete chemical analysis of measurements in Switzerland

Model suggests that mineral dust can be important in the summer

Lessons learnt from the 1. EMEP IMP• Produced a set of valuable data and new possibilities for

validation of the EMEP model, In particular: • size-distribution and formation rates of HNO3 and coarse nitrate• the diurnal variation of ammonia, EMEP model to be coupled to a

dynamic ammonia emission module• underestimation of EC and OC at southern sites, suggesting that

residential wood burning source is underestimated in winter

• Identified several measurement problems• Lack of mineral dust measurements• Biased measurements for nitrogen and carbonaceous matter• Lack of comparability• No standardized reporting format

Improved in future intensive periods

Intensive periods 2008 and 2009

Sites with AMS measurements in the EUCAARI campaigns 2008/2009

Relative organic source contributions (ME-2 results).

EMEP IMP 2008/2009 - The Carbonaceous Aerosol

Source apportionment of the carbonaceous aerosol by using weekly data on EC, OCp, TCp, levoglucosan and the 14C/12C as input for the statistical method Latin Hypecube Sampling (LHS)

Weekly measurement and centralized laboratories and/or harmonized method (i.e EUSAAR-2)

Relative contribution to the carbonaceous fraction in PM10

05.10.09

Winter/spring

Fall

Five predefined subcategories/sources.

Elemental and organic carbon from combustion of

biomass (ECbb and OCbb)

fossil fuel sources (ECff and OCff),

organic carbon from natural sources (OCnf).  

Intensive periodes 2012 and 2013June 8 to July 12(7) 2012, and jan/febr 2013 One year measurements with ACSM (from june 2012)High resolution, and extended measurements of aerosols

and its precursors (ACTRIS) while EMEP has a special focus on mineral dust.

A cooperation between • EMEP TFMM (http://www.nilu.no/projects/ccc/tfmm/ • ACTRIS (http://www.actris.net/)• ChArMeX (http://charmex.lsce.ipsl.fr). • EARLINET• Pegasos (http://pegasos.iceht.f orth.gr/

ACTRIS

Distribution of sites

05.10.09

+Armenia

Speciation of PM10, summer 2012

12

1

234

5

6

7

89

10

11

1413

Mineral dust: centralized lab using PIXE – laboratory in Florence. - Scientific lead:

Xavier Querol and Andres Alestuey, CSIC

Inorganic ions (regular EMEP)

Carbonaceous• EC/OC (EMEP + extra)• Carbonate (Lead by JP

Putaud and Fabrizia Cavalli, JRC)

Mineral dust (june 2012)(µg/m3)

Mineral load: obtained by the addition of the SiO2, Al2O3, Fe2O3 concentrations, and the dust contribution of Na2O, K2O, CaO and MgO after the subtraction of their marine contribution from the bulk concentrations

7,2

African dust episodes

7-Jun-12

8-Jun-12

9-Jun-12

10-Jun-12

11-Jun-12

12-Jun-12

13-Jun-12

14-Jun-12

15-Jun-12

16-Jun-12

17-Jun-12

18-Jun-12

19-Jun-12

20-Jun-12

21-Jun-12

22-Jun-12

23-Jun-12

24-Jun-12

25-Jun-12

26-Jun-12

27-Jun-12

28-Jun-12

29-Jun-12

30-Jun-12

1-Jul-1

2

2-Jul-1

2

3-Jul-1

2

4-Jul-1

2

5-Jul-1

2

6-Jul-1

2

7-Jul-1

2

8-Jul-1

2

9-Jul-1

2

10-Jul-1

2

11-Jul-1

2

12-Jul-1

2

13-Jul-1

2

14-Jul-1

2

15-Jul-1

2

16-Jul-1

2

17-Jul-1

20

5000

10000

15000

20000

25000

30000

35000

40000

45000

Mineral dustIE31 SE12 SK06MD13 AM01 GB48FR30 CH02 DE44IT01 IT04 GR02ES1778

Min

eral

dus

t ng/

m3

From Lucia Mona –CNR-IMAA, Potenza

Trace metals: fuel oil combustion

Vng/m3

Trace metals: mixed origin

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 80

5

10

15

20

25

f(x) = 2.54532295307559 x − 0.336424643038225R² = 0.717034173162029

Ni ng/m3

V ng

/m3

Ni

Cr

fuel oil combustion

metallurgical origin

Trace metals: traffic originng/m3

Trace metals: coal combustion

Sulphate

fuel oil combustion

coalcombustion

Data quality and quality control• Essential to have harmonized measurements to be

able to do comparison over time and space• Standard operation procedures and reference

methods developed• Regular field and laboratory intercomparison• Reporting guidlines

Monitoring frameworks:

Infrastructure projects

Summary The EMEP intensive measurement periods have become an important part of the

monitoring programme Production of high resolution and/or advanced measurement (EUCAARI and ACTRIS). Production of chemical composition data on mineral dust and carbonaceous matter

using comparable field and analytical methodology at a number of regional background sites representative of different European regions

Established reporting guidelines and QA/QC procedures for a range of new components for the EMEP Community (EUSAAR and ACTRIS project central)

Enhanced the cooperation between the research and monitoring communities –win win, co benefit: EMEP benefits from the scientific development and development of reference

methods and reporting Research projects benefits from infrastructure and added value of the data (increased

visibility). Partnership is often a prerequisite to get funding from the Commission Data available at: http://ebas.nilu.no/ Future campaigns are not fixed. Potentially in 2016, though need partnerships