Electron Cloud meeting 16-05-2014
description
Transcript of Electron Cloud meeting 16-05-2014
![Page 1: Electron Cloud meeting 16-05-2014](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062803/56814833550346895db5537e/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Electron Cloud meeting 16-05-2014
Simulation of EC detectors: implementation and results
A. Romano, G. Iadarola, G. Rumolo
Many thanks to: Christina Yin Vallgren
![Page 2: Electron Cloud meeting 16-05-2014](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062803/56814833550346895db5537e/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
2
• Introduction
• Simulation of EC detectors in PyECLOUD
– First results for SPS like strip monitor
– Comparison against previous ECLOUD simulations
• Summary and future Work
Outline
![Page 3: Electron Cloud meeting 16-05-2014](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062803/56814833550346895db5537e/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
3
• Introduction
• Simulation of EC detectors in PyECLOUD
– First results for SPS like strip monitor
– Comparison against previous ECLOUD simulations
• Summary and future Work
Outline
![Page 4: Electron Cloud meeting 16-05-2014](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062803/56814833550346895db5537e/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
4
New PS EC Detector
Biased Electrode:Measure current from EC
Grid
• New electron cloud (EC) detectors have been installed in one of the PS main magnets to study EC effects in strong magnetic field conditions (B>1 T)
[By Teddy Capelli EN/MME]
![Page 5: Electron Cloud meeting 16-05-2014](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062803/56814833550346895db5537e/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
5
V_bias
I_ ec
e-
EC Detector
• EC detectors are used to measure the electron flux onto the chamber’s wall
• Electrons are collected by a shielded electrode and measured as a current signal
Many thanks to M.Taborelli
![Page 6: Electron Cloud meeting 16-05-2014](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062803/56814833550346895db5537e/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
6
• In a drift space (B=0) electrons are free to move inside the chamber.
• In a strong dipolar magnetic field, the electrons move along helicoidal trajectories around the field lines.
o Inside the hole there is no multipactor effect, electrons come only from the edge
EC Detector: effect of the magnetic field
B
![Page 7: Electron Cloud meeting 16-05-2014](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062803/56814833550346895db5537e/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
7
• Introduction
• Simulation of EC detectors in PyECLOUD
– First results for SPS like strip monitor
– Comparison against previous ECLOUD simulations
• Summary and future Work
Outline
![Page 8: Electron Cloud meeting 16-05-2014](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062803/56814833550346895db5537e/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
8
Simulation method development
• For the development we considered the EC detector installed in the SPS (strip detector) since we can compare against previous simulations and measurements (also with applied B)
![Page 9: Electron Cloud meeting 16-05-2014](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062803/56814833550346895db5537e/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
9
Simulation method development
• For the development we considered the EC detector installed in the SPS (strip detector) since we can compare against previous simulations and measurements (also with applied B)
64 rows of holes shifted with respect to each other to explore different horizontal positions
![Page 10: Electron Cloud meeting 16-05-2014](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062803/56814833550346895db5537e/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
10
Simulation strategy
What we have done ?• Due to the symmetric and periodic
geometry of detector, it is possible to calculate the total current considering only 7 different rows
• Each row has a different position of the holes on the top wall of the beam pipe
• The surface of beam pipe is made of adjacent segments of different size and SEY:
zx
• d= 2 mm• SEY = 0 (absorbing
surface)hole
• SEY=[1.3,1.4,1.5]chamber
![Page 11: Electron Cloud meeting 16-05-2014](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062803/56814833550346895db5537e/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
What we have done ?
11
• Due to the symmetric and periodic geometry of detector, it is possible to calculate the total current considering only 7 different rows
• Each row has a different position of the holes on the top wall of the beam pipe
• The surface of beam pipe is made of adjacent segments of different size and SEY:
zx
• d= 2 mm• SEY = 0 (absorbing
surface)hole
• SEY=[1.3,1.4,1.5]chamber
Simulation strategy
![Page 12: Electron Cloud meeting 16-05-2014](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062803/56814833550346895db5537e/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
What we have done ?
12
• Due to the symmetric and periodic geometry of detector, it is possible to calculate the total current considering only 7 different rows
• Each row has a different position of the holes on the top wall of the beam pipe
• The surface of beam pipe is made of adjacent segments of different size and SEY:
zx
• d= 2 mm• SEY = 0 (absorbing
surface)hole
• SEY=[1.3,1.4,1.5]chamber
Simulation strategy
![Page 13: Electron Cloud meeting 16-05-2014](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062803/56814833550346895db5537e/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
What we have done ?
13
• Due to the symmetric and periodic geometry of detector, it is possible to calculate the total current considering only 7 different rows
• Each row has a different position of the holes on the top wall of the beam pipe
• The surface of beam pipe is made of adjacent segments of different size and SEY:
zx
• d= 2 mm• SEY = 0 (absorbing
surface)hole
• SEY=[1.3,1.4,1.5]chamber
Simulation strategy
![Page 14: Electron Cloud meeting 16-05-2014](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062803/56814833550346895db5537e/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
What we have done ?
14
• Due to the symmetric and periodic geometry of detector, it is possible to calculate the total current considering only 7 different rows
• Each row has a different position of the holes on the top wall of the beam pipe
• The surface of beam pipe is made of adjacent segments of different size and SEY:
zx
• d= 2 mm• SEY = 0 (absorbing
surface)hole
• SEY=[1.3,1.4,1.5]chamber
Simulation strategy
![Page 15: Electron Cloud meeting 16-05-2014](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062803/56814833550346895db5537e/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
What we have done ?
15
• Due to the symmetric and periodic geometry of detector, it is possible to calculate the total current considering only 7 different rows
• Each row has a different position of the holes on the top wall of the beam pipe
• The surface of beam pipe is made of adjacent segments of different size and SEY:
zx
• d= 2 mm• SEY = 0 (absorbing
surface)hole
• SEY=[1.3,1.4,1.5]chamber
Simulation strategy
![Page 16: Electron Cloud meeting 16-05-2014](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062803/56814833550346895db5537e/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
What we have done ?
16
• Due to the symmetric and periodic geometry of detector, it is possible to calculate the total current considering only 7 different rows
• Each row has a different position of the holes on the top wall of the beam pipe
• The surface of beam pipe is made of adjacent segments of different size and SEY:
zx
• d= 2 mm• SEY = 0 (absorbing
surface)hole
• SEY=[1.3,1.4,1.5]chamber
Simulation strategy
![Page 17: Electron Cloud meeting 16-05-2014](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062803/56814833550346895db5537e/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
17
…… what are the results?
Effect of the magnetic field on the EC distributionFor B > 400 G the distribution stays practically constant
Hole
Simulation results
![Page 18: Electron Cloud meeting 16-05-2014](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062803/56814833550346895db5537e/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
18
…… what are the results?
Effect of the magnetic field on the EC distributionFor B > 400 G the distribution stays practically constant
For large B the hole gets depleted
Simulation results
![Page 19: Electron Cloud meeting 16-05-2014](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062803/56814833550346895db5537e/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
19
Simulation results
Similar results for the different arrays of hole(through the chamber)
![Page 20: Electron Cloud meeting 16-05-2014](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062803/56814833550346895db5537e/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
20
Similar results for the different arrays of holes(through the chamber)
Simulation results
![Page 21: Electron Cloud meeting 16-05-2014](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062803/56814833550346895db5537e/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
21
Similar results for the different arrays of holes(through the chamber)
Simulation results
![Page 22: Electron Cloud meeting 16-05-2014](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062803/56814833550346895db5537e/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
22
Simulation results
Similar results for the different arrays of holes(through the chamber)
![Page 23: Electron Cloud meeting 16-05-2014](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062803/56814833550346895db5537e/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
23
Similar results for the different arrays of holes(through the chamber)
Simulation results
![Page 24: Electron Cloud meeting 16-05-2014](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062803/56814833550346895db5537e/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
24
Similar results for the different arrays of holes(through the chamber)
Simulation results
![Page 25: Electron Cloud meeting 16-05-2014](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062803/56814833550346895db5537e/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
25
Similar results for the different arrays of holes(through the chamber)
Simulation results
![Page 26: Electron Cloud meeting 16-05-2014](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062803/56814833550346895db5537e/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
26
Simulations Comparison
The total currents (through the holes) for the different configurations look very similar
Aver.
Small differences for intermediate B values
SEY=1.4
I [u
A]
![Page 27: Electron Cloud meeting 16-05-2014](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062803/56814833550346895db5537e/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Total current calculated considering the 64 rows of the detector
27
Simulations Comparison
SEY=1.4
![Page 28: Electron Cloud meeting 16-05-2014](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062803/56814833550346895db5537e/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
28
• B=0 Threshold influenced by the holes (holes weaken the EC)• B=1000 G Threshold independent from the holes
Effect of the presence of the holes on the multipacting threshold
Simulation results
![Page 29: Electron Cloud meeting 16-05-2014](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062803/56814833550346895db5537e/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
29
Decreasing the number of holes the threshold converges to the unperturbed case
Simulation results
![Page 30: Electron Cloud meeting 16-05-2014](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062803/56814833550346895db5537e/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
30
Simulation results
B = 0.1 T, SEY = 1.35
Electron flux profile with and without the holes for strong B
• EC is suppressed at the hole locations but gets enhanced elsewhere the effect could be related to the electron space charge
![Page 31: Electron Cloud meeting 16-05-2014](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062803/56814833550346895db5537e/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
31
Previous ECLOUD simulation results
Simulations Comparison
PyECLOUD simulations
Simulation results are compatible with results of previous studies
G. Rumolo, 2009
![Page 32: Electron Cloud meeting 16-05-2014](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062803/56814833550346895db5537e/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
32
• Introduction
• Simulation of EC detectors in PyECLOUD
– First results for SPS like strip monitor
– Comparison against previous ECLOUD simulations
• Summary and future Work
Outline
![Page 33: Electron Cloud meeting 16-05-2014](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062803/56814833550346895db5537e/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
33
• The capability of simulating EC detectors has been implemented in PyECLOUD
- First application study of SPS strip detector
• The presence of the holes in the chamber perturbs the EC distribution- For low B, leads to a significant increase of the multipacting threshold- For high B, results in no change in threshold but stronger multipacting between
holes because of less space charge
• Successful benchmark with existing ECLOUD simulations for an SPS strip detector
- Results reproduce well previous simulation performed with ECLOUD
• Next steps - Apply model to PS shielded pick up in SS98 and compare with 2011/2012 time
resolved data- Apply model for the new PS ecloud detectors in MU98 and predict 2014
measurements
Summary and future work
![Page 34: Electron Cloud meeting 16-05-2014](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062803/56814833550346895db5537e/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
34
Thanks for your attention!
![Page 35: Electron Cloud meeting 16-05-2014](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062803/56814833550346895db5537e/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
35
![Page 36: Electron Cloud meeting 16-05-2014](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062803/56814833550346895db5537e/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
36
![Page 37: Electron Cloud meeting 16-05-2014](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062803/56814833550346895db5537e/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
37
![Page 38: Electron Cloud meeting 16-05-2014](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062803/56814833550346895db5537e/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
38
![Page 39: Electron Cloud meeting 16-05-2014](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062803/56814833550346895db5537e/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
39
![Page 40: Electron Cloud meeting 16-05-2014](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062803/56814833550346895db5537e/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
40
![Page 41: Electron Cloud meeting 16-05-2014](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062803/56814833550346895db5537e/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
41
![Page 42: Electron Cloud meeting 16-05-2014](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062803/56814833550346895db5537e/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
42
• Mean value of current considering the first 7 rows, for different SEY.
Simulations Comparison