eee 307 lab 2
-
Upload
bappy-ahmed -
Category
Documents
-
view
227 -
download
0
Transcript of eee 307 lab 2
-
8/11/2019 eee 307 lab 2
1/5
Q/As :
1. Calculation of the modulation index and power of the modulated signal from the
experimental data is given below:
Calculation of modulation index for first case:
Amax= 3.939V
Amin = .3V
!odulation "ndex# a = $Amax % Amin& ' $Amax( Amin& = .99) * 1
Calculation of power for first case:
+ighest pea, $of carrier& from fre-uenc spectrum# / = 0.d2
1log1$& = /
= 1 $/ ' 1&= 3.999445
6o# +ighest pea, $of carrier& from fre-uenc spectrum# = 3.999445
Another pea, $of message and carrier& from fre-uenc spectrum# + = % .9d2
1log1$7& = +
7 = 1 $+ ' 1&= .93840
6o# +ighest pea, $of carrier& from fre-uenc spectrum# 7 = .93840
ower = ( 47= 38.491
Figure 1 : PSD of the modulated signal for this case(a=1)
Calculation of modulation index for 6econd case:
Amax= 8.143V
Amin = %.9)4V
!odulation "ndex# a = $Amax % Amin& ' $Amax( Amin& = 1.453
Calculation of power for 6econd case:
+ighest pea, $of carrier& from fre-uenc spectrum# / = 0.d2
1log1$& = / = 1 $/ ' 1&= 3.999445
-
8/11/2019 eee 307 lab 2
2/5
6o# +ighest pea, $of carrier& from fre-uenc spectrum# = 3.999445
Another pea, $of message and carrier& from fre-uenc spectrum# + = 3.54d2
1log1$7& = +
7 = 1 $+ ' 1&= .3089196o# +ighest pea, $of carrier& from fre-uenc spectrum# 7 = .308919
ower = ( 47= 84.3)1
Figure 2 : PSD of the modulated signal for this case(a>1)
Calculation of modulation index for third case:
Amax= 3.3)9V
Amin = .03V
!odulation "ndex# a = $Amax % Amin& ' $Amax( Amin& = .0)80
Calculation of power for third case:
+ighest pea, $of carrier& from fre-uenc spectrum# / = 8.94d2
1log1$& = /
= 1 $/ ' 1&= 3.90449
6o# +ighest pea, $of carrier& from fre-uenc spectrum# = 3.90449
Another pea, $of message and carrier& from fre-uenc spectrum# + = %3.9d2
1log1$7& = +
7 = 1 $+ ' 1&= .40))13
6o# +ighest pea, $of carrier& from fre-uenc spectrum# 7 = .40))13
ower = ( 47= 31.513
-
8/11/2019 eee 307 lab 2
3/5
Figure 3: PSD of the modulated signal for this case(a and ?ero
when u$t&. he message signal is recovered b passing the rectified signal through a
lowpass filter whose bandwidth matches that of the message signal. he dc
component can then be eliminated b passing this output through a transformer.
@utput of the transformer is amplified'attenuated version of the message signal.
he simplicit of the demodulator has made conventional 62 A! a practical choice
for A! radio broadcasting. 6ince there are literall billions of radio receivers# an
inexpensive implementation of the demodulator is extremel important. he power
inefficienc of conventional A! is justifiedb the fact that there are few broadcast
transmitters relative to the number of receivers. Conse-uentl# it is cost effective to
construct powerful transmitters and sacrifice power efficienc in order to simplif the
signal demodulation at the receivers.
hatBs wh hough 62 is an inefficient modulation method in terms of power#
because of eas detection# itBs preferred over 62%6C in A! modulation.D
3. !AEA2 code for a conventional A! signal generation and plot of modulated signal
for the as,ed values of Fa is given below:
clc
clf
clear all
del=1G%0H
am=1H
fm=33HAc=H
-
8/11/2019 eee 307 lab 2
4/5
fc=0H
t=:del:.1H
mt=amIcos$IpiIfm.It&H
ct=AcIcos$IpiIfc.It&H
Fa1=.5
ut1=AcI$1(Fa1IamIcos$IpiIfm.It&&.Icos$IpiIfc.It&HFa=1
ut=AcI$1(FaIamIcos$IpiIfm.It&&.Icos$IpiIfc.It&H
Fa3=1.0
ut3=AcI$1(Fa3IamIcos$IpiIfm.It&&.Icos$IpiIfc.It&H
figure$1&
subplot$311&
plot$t#ut1&
grid on
xlabel$Jtime# tJ&
label$Jmodulated signal#u$t&J&
title$Ju$t& vs t plot for Fa=.5J&subplot$31&
plot$t#ut&
grid on
xlabel$Jtime# tJ&
label$Jmodulated signal#u$t&J&
title$Ju$t& vs t plot for Fa=1J&
subplot$313&
plot$t#ut3&
grid on
xlabel$Jtime# tJ&
label$Jmodulated signal#u$t&J&
title$Ju$t& vs t plot for Fa=1.0J&
-
8/11/2019 eee 307 lab 2
5/5
0 0.001 0.002 0.003 0.004 0.005 0.006 0.007 0.008 0.009 0.01-40
-20
0
20
40
time, t
modulate
dsignal,u(t)
u(t) vs t plot for Ka=0.7
0 0.001 0.002 0.003 0.004 0.005 0.006 0.007 0.008 0.009 0.01-40
-20
0
20
40
time, t
modulatedsignal,u(t)
u(t) vs t plot for Ka=1
0 0.001 0.002 0.003 0.004 0.005 0.006 0.007 0.008 0.009 0.01-100
-50
0
50
100
time, t
modulatedsignal,u(t)
u(t) vs t plot for Ka=1.6
Reference:
1. Communication 6stems Kngineering# ndKditionH Author: Lohn /. roa,is# !asoud
6alehi