Edward T. Waters, Esq. May 12-13, 2015 Head Start Grants Management and Head Start Eligibility ©...
-
Upload
ambrose-barton -
Category
Documents
-
view
218 -
download
1
Transcript of Edward T. Waters, Esq. May 12-13, 2015 Head Start Grants Management and Head Start Eligibility ©...
Edward T. Waters, Esq.
May 12-13, 2015
Head Start Grants Management and
Head Start Eligibility
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
2
PRESENTER: EDWARD “TED” WATERS
• Well known for his expertise in federal grants and contracts, government reimbursement methodologies in the areas of health and social services, and the many issues that arise in managing federal programs, Ted was again selected in 2015 as a “SuperLawyer” in Washington, D.C.
• Ted has been lead counsel in many arenas: litigation, audit defense, internal investigations to name a few and focuses on practical, long-term solutions for his clients. Ted has clients across the country and has represented many Head Start programs since joining the Firm in 1992.
• He has been Managing Partner of Feldesman Tucker since 2003 and has just started his second year teaching a course in federal grants at the George Washington University School of Law.
• Contact Information: [email protected] or 202.466.8960
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
3
DISCLAIMER
• This training has been prepared by the attorneys of Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. The opinions expressed in these materials are solely their views and not necessarily the view of any other organization.
• The training is designed to assist your organization in developing and implementing effective operations consistent with the expectations of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services’ (“HHS”) Administration for Children and Families (“ACF”) for Head Start/EHS grantees.
• The materials are being issued with the understanding that the authors are not engaged in rendering legal services. If legal advice or other expert assistance is required, the services of a competent professional should be sought. The information provided is only general information.
• Please do not record today’s session.
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
4
OVERVIEW
Day 1: Head Start Grants Management• The Supercircular/Omnicircular/UGG• Time and Effort Reporting• Cost Allocation• Matching
Day 2: Head Start Eligibility Requirements• Final Rule on Head Start Eligibility
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
5
Head Start Grants Management
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
6
THOUGHT FOR THE DAY
"If you want a friend in Washington,
get a dog."
- Harry S. Truman
(allegedly)
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
7
The Supercircular
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
8
LEARNING OBJECTIVES
• What does the New Circular look like and when is it effective?
• Key elements grantees need (or may want) to know• Contracts and Subgrants• Standards of Conduct
• What to do next?
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
9
INFLOWS/OUTFLOWS IN A FEDERALLY-FUNDED ORGANIZATION
Grantee
Sub-recipients
Direct Payments, e.g.Salary and Fringe
Procurements
Matching
Program Income
Federal funds
Other funding
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
10
OMB AND THE WHOLE INSIDE-THE-BELTWAY ALPHABET SOUP
OMB – Office of Management and Budget
CFOC – “Chief Financial Officers Council, established pursuant to Chief Financial Officers (CFO) Act of 1990 (Public Law 101-576), is an organization of the CFOs and Deputy CFOs of the largest Federal agencies, senior officials of the Office of Management and Budget and the Department of the Treasury who work collaboratively to improve financial management in the U.S. Government.”
COFAR – Council on Financial Assistance Reform” “The COFAR, established by OMB Memorandum M-12-01, is comprised of an interagency group of Executive Branch officials to coordinate financial assistance.”
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
8
EXISTING CIRCULARS
A-102 A-110 A-89
A-21 A-87 A-122
A-133 A-50
Grants AdministrationRequirements
FederalDomestic AssistanceRequirements
Cost Principles for Universities, State/Local/Tribal Gov’ts, & Non-Profits
Audit & Audit Follow-Up Requirements
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
12
THE SUPERCIRCULAR: UNIFORM GRANTS GUIDANCE
A-102 A-110 A-89
A-21 A-87 A-122
A-133 A-50
Uniform Grants
Guidance
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
13
PROCESS AND EFFECTIVE DATEOn Dec. 19, 2014 - HHS adopted (with changes) the OMB Supercircular Guidance from 2 C.F.R. Part 200 through the “Joint Interim Final Rule”
– HHS codified the text, with its HHS-specific amendments into own implementing regulations at 45 C.F.R. Part 75
– In the interest of establishing one location for each federal department’s implementing regulations, HHS provided a link to its policy implementation in 2 C.F.R. Part 300
– 45 Part 74 & 92 are superseded for new funding increments and will be rescinded
After Dec. 26, 2014 (Effective Date) – The new rules are applicable to new funds provided to your organization after this date. Current awards unchanged.
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
14
COFAR, FAQS AND HOW TO GET IN TOUCH
“Frequently Asked Questions”
Current issuance of FAQs at: https://cfo.gov/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/2-C.F.R.-200-FAQs-2-12-2014.pdf
COFAR has promised more to come as agencies roll out their regulations:
“OMB and the COFAR will continue to engage Federal and Non-Federal stakeholders (that’s you!) over the next year to facilitate a smooth implementation process. Please submit any comments or questions to [email protected] ...”
NOTE: There are still lots of Typos so don’t be shy
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
15
HOW IS THE GUIDANCE LAID OUT?
New 45 CFR part 75, (part 74 and 92 will be removed from CFR):
Six subparts A through F which areA. Acronyms and Definitions
B. General Provisions
C. Pre-Federal Award Requirements and Contents of Federal Awards
D. Post Federal Award Requirements
E. Cost Principles
F. Audit Requirements
Plus 11 Appendices (I-XI)
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
16
THINGS WORTH KNOWING ABOUT THE SC
-- or –
If you fall from that tree and break your leg, don't come running to me.
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
1. The Goal is Uniformity
• Same set of rules apply to all Non-Federal Entities (“NFEs”) mostly
• Consistent terminology• Standardization across the board as we shall
see…..
17© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
18
2. FOCUS ON PERFORMANCE OVER COMPLIANCE
One Example: Fixed Amount Awards – up to simplified acquisition threshold (currently $150,000), Criteria found at 75.201(b)
– Payment based on meeting requirements– Accountability based on performance– Cost principles are guide to setting award amount – Limits on use (but no matching share so not good for
Head Start but other funding?)– NOTE: Modified in Interim Final Rule
Renewed emphasis on performance measures
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
19
3. STANDARDIZATION OF BUSINESS PROCESSES
Subpart A - Standard definitions throughout, e.g., contractors and subrecipients, not numerous terms for the same thing
75.203: requires standardized notices of funding opportunities
75.204-205: requires Federal awarding agency to evaluate the merit and risk associated with a potential Federal award
75.210: specifies a list of required elements including information, terms and conditions, and performance goals that Notices of Awards must contain
– Subrecipient Agreements should track same info, discussed below
We have already seen this in the DRS of course…
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
20
4. SUBRECIPIENT RELATIONSHIPS – 75.351
• The basic difference between subrecipients and contractors stems from the purpose or the nature of the money being passed from the grantee to the sub
• Subrecipient: Take a piece of your program (programmatic decision making) must comply with all regulations
– If Subrecipient must be approved by feds– Called a Delegate in Head Start
• Contractor: Buying something to help you do your program or meet your purpose (paper and pencils or medical supplies)
– If Contractor refer to procurement standards
• Distinction leads to different requirements!– Delegate agency rights under HS Act and Performance Standards….
• You Decide what the relationship is!
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
21
IMPORTANT CHANGES STARTING AT 75.352
• Content of Subrecipient agreement must be the same as content of federal award (or at least as close as possible). It’s a long list such as identification of funding source, record access, amount obligated.– Don’t forget the Supercircular terms flow down too!
• Recognition of indirect cost rates, negotiate a rate or provide de minimis rate
• Fixed price subawards with approval of feds.
• Must evaluate risk of noncompliance in order to determine appropriate monitoring
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
22
75.352(d) MONITORING SUBRECIPIENTS
• Also allows grantees to impose additional specific conditions on subrecipient that materially fails to comply with general and program-specific terms and conditions
• Requires the grantee to “monitor the activities” of the subrecipient to “ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes”– Specifically lists what monitoring should include (financial and
programmatic reports, other items; following up to ensure subrecipient takes appropriate action; issuing management decisions for audit findings affecting pass-through entities programs)
– Allows pass-through entity to perform on-site reviews, provide T/TA, arrange for agreed-upon procedures engagements
– Allows pass-through entities to evaluate risk posed by subrecipients
• In Head Start we already had to do this…..
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
23
5. CHANGES TO PROCUREMENT RULES
New stuff!– Organizational conflicts of interest– Sole Sourcing rules– Simplified Acquisition Threshold updated– Micro-Purchase Threshold
Not new stuff (still there and still important)– Competition requirements– Graduated system of complexity– Documentation of cost/price analysis
AND the Grace Period if you can’t stand doing this…
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
24
COMMON CONTRACTING ACTIVITIES FOR HEAD START PROGRAMS
Services Performed by People:– Transportation services– Food services– Cleaning services– IT support– 3 Experts on Board (if can’t find volunteers)– Legal and compliance services– Purchase of Service of Child Care Slots
Items Often Contracted For:– Classroom Equipment – New Busses– Copier Rental– Computers
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
25
SIMPLIFIED PROCUREMENT PROCEDURES FOR SMALL PURCHASES
Simplified procurement procedures allowed under the Simplified Acquisition Threshold (see 75.329(b))
Simplified Acquisition Threshold - the dollar amount below which a non-Federal entity may purchase property or services using small purchase methods.”
SAT is set by the FAR amount updated periodically to keep pace with inflation, 48 C.F.R. Subpart 2.1 (Definitions) and in accordance with 41 U.S.C. 1908” ($150,000 at the time of publication)
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
26
75.329(F) SOLE SOURCE (OPTION)
Still requires free and open competition to the maximum amount possible.
Explicitly allows for sole source for procurements over $3,000, but only in 4 specific circumstances (uses language from State, Local and Tribal Gov’ts) at 75.329(f):
“(1) The item is available only from a single source;
(2) The public exigency or emergency for the requirement will not permit a delay resulting from competitive solicitation;
(3) The Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity expressly authorizes noncompetitive proposals in response to a written request from the recipient; or
(4) After solicitation of a number of sources, competition is determined inadequate.”
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
27
NECESSARY CLAUSES: TYPE OF AGREEMENT
• Clearly articulate if the agreement is a subrecipient or vendor arrangement (See A-133 for distinctions)
• Will lead to different oversight and monitoring provisions, as well as reporting provisions
• If Sub-R: Make clear it is cost reimbursement agreement that disallowed costs will have to be returned by the sub-R, even after the period of performance.
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
28
NECESSARY CLAUSES: SCOPE OF WORK
Poorly defined scope of work can put you at risk.– Should describe the subject of the contract, the
services and/or products at issue, with clarity and precision relevant to the program’s expectations
In describing the deliverables, include:– Quantities: hours, units, estimated page length– Deadlines (require timely delivery and be prepared to
monitor and enforce deadlines)– Name any key persons you want to perform or
supervise the work and whether they must have a particular skill, educational degree, license, credential, or permit
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
29
NECESSARY CLAUSES: PAYMENT PROVISIONS
Poorly drafted payment provisions can be problematic– Provide for unambiguous payment provisions for both
amounts and timing– Is there a ceiling on how much the program will pay for
the service/product?– Evaluate the method of payment options in terms of what
best suits the program’s situation (i.e. paying in advance, paying at the completion of contract work, etc.)
– If pay is contingent on receipt of funds from another source, include that provision
• “subject to the availability of funds”
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
30
NECESSARY CLAUSES: RECORDKEEPING/ACCESS TO RECORDS
• Include clear record-keeping requirements consistent with grant obligations (have not changed under Part 75)– Define what necessary records the contractor is required to
keep– Define how long contract-related records should be
retained (e.g. if contracting with a third party to assist with the performance of a grant, require the contractor to keep the records for the same period of time)
• Include a provision requiring the contractor to, upon reasonable notice, permit the grantee access to pertinent records (including personnel for interview/discussion purposes) – Federal grantors insist on this access– Note: Audit Contracts under Subpart F
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
31
NECESSARY CLAUSES: REPORTING REQUIREMENTS
• Clearly set forth reporting requirements.– Progress Reports: used to ensure contractor is
performing satisfactorily. Determine how often they should be submitted
– Financial and Other reports: If financial and programmatic reports are required, include appropriate reporting requirements in the contract.
– Audit Reports: if a program receives a federal grant and awards of $750,000 or more, require its sub-recipients to submit their Subpart F audit reports to the program and to take prompt corrective action regarding adverse findings
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
32
6. NEW RULES ON OVERSIGHT§ 75.112 Conflict of interest.
(a) HHS awarding agencies must establish conflict of interest policies for Federal awards. The non-Federal entity must disclose in writing any potential conflict of interest to the respective HHS awarding agency or pass-through entity in accordance with applicable HHS awarding agency’s policy. As a general matter, HHS awarding agencies’ conflict of interest policies must:
1) Address conditions under which outside activities, relationships, or financial interests are proper or improper;
2) Provide for advance notification of outside activities, relationships, or financial interests, and a process of review as appropriate; and
3) Outline how financial conflicts of interest may be addressed.
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
33
6. NEW RULES ON OVERSIGHT
What might this look like for HHS?– It is already in the HHS GPS:
“HHS requires recipients to establish safeguards to prevent employees, consultants, members of governing bodies, and others who may be involved in grant-supported activities from using their positions for purposes that are, or give the appearance of being, motivated by a desire for private financial gain for themselves or others, such as those with whom they have family, business, or other ties . . . cover, at a minimum, expected conduct in regard to financial interests, gifts, gratuities and favors, nepotism . . .”
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
34
MORE OVERSIGHT
45 CFR 75.113 Mandatory Disclosures (NEW)• Non-Federal entities or applicants for Federal awards
must disclose, in a timely manner, in writing to the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity all violations of Federal criminal law involving fraud, bribery, or gratuity violations potentially affecting the Federal award
• Failure to disclose can result in withholding of current awards and/or future awards, disallowance, suspension of award, debarment, or any other remedy legally available
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
35
STILL MORE: 45 CFR 75.327(c)(2) ORGANIZATIONAL CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
In addition to the standard Code of Conduct provisions about selection, administration, and award of contracts:
“If the non-Federal entity has a parent, affiliate, or subsidiary organization that is not a state, local government, or Indian tribe, the non-Federal entity must also maintain written standards of conduct covering organizational conflicts of interest.”
“Organizational conflicts of interest means that because of relationships with a parent company, affiliate, or subsidiary organization, the non-Federal entity is unable or appears to be unable to be impartial in conducting a procurement action involving a related organization.”
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
36
7. INTERNAL CONTROL REQUIREMENTS BAKED IN!
75.303 Internal Controls - Requires non-Federal entity to have internal controls that:
(a) Provide “reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award”;
(b) “Comply with Federal statutes regulations and the terms and conditions of the Federal Awards”;
(c) “Evaluate and monitor the non-Federal entity’s compliance with statute, regulations and terms and conditions of Federal awards”;
(d) “Take prompt action when instances of noncompliance are identified including noncompliance in audit findings”; and
(e) “Take reasonable measures to safeguard protected personally identifiable information and other information the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity designates as sensitive or the non-Federal entity considers sensitive consistent with Federal, state and local laws regarding privacy and obligations of confidentiality”
37
COSO Internal Control Components
Control Environment
Risk Assessment
Control Activities
MonitoringInf
ormati
on &
Communication
38
8. MODIFICATION TO AUDIT REQUIREMENTS
• Can’t call it A-133 anymore! • 75.110(b) -- Applies to audits of fiscal years
“beginning on or after December 26, 2014” • 75.501 – raises single audit threshold to
$750,000 from $500,000• 75.512 – Audit clearinghouse will make reports
available on the “Web” • 75.518 – Major Program Determination focuses
on internal control deficiencies
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
FROM A LAWYER’S PERSPECTIVE
1. Sect. 75.503(a) – “in lieu of any financial audit” required “under any other Federal statute or regulation” but see §200.503(b) which allows Fed. Agency, OIG and GAO to conduct “additional audits.”
2. Auditor Procurement --- § 75.509, “Auditor Selection” --- Follow procurement standards, “objective is to obtain high-quality audits” and if you recover more than $1.0M in indirect, auditor cannot prepare indirect cost proposal or Cost Allocation Plan. Word to wise: don’t just sign engagement agreement! It can be changed…
3. GAGAS § 75.514(a) -- Audits under subpart F (and OIG for that matter) must be conducted in accordance with GAGAS
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com 39
40
Moving Past Overview:
Indirect Cost Rates and Cost Allocation Issues and Requirements Under the Supercircular
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
41
ADVANTAGES OF AN ICRA POST SUPERCIRCULAR
• PTEs (like States!) have to follow them now– Unless statutory limitation, of course– Remember: while Block Grant generally exempt from Cost
Principles, CSBG is not…
• Purchases with Indirect dollars exempt from procurement rules – NICE for HS
• Cash management tool – Not directly tied to costs• Bid and Proposal costs allowable – HUGE for HS!• Special Rates, like Fringe Benefit rate, are possible• Pricing and Budgeting Easier in Multi-funded
Environment
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
42
DISADVANTAGES OF ICRA
• It is an estimate and is not particularly flexible• Not good in times of rapid growth/downsizing• Negotiating with different office of your cognizant
agency may be difficult• Division of Cost Allocation now called “Cost
Allocation Services” at HHS for example• Division of Cost Determination at Labor• Another thing to worry about!
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
43
PURPOSE OF COST PRINCIPLES
“The principles are designed to provide that Federal awards bear their fair share of cost recognized under these principles except where restricted or prohibited by statute.”
2 C.F.R. §200.100(c)/45 C.F.R. § 75.100(c)
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
44
KEY CONCEPTS IN FEDERAL GRANTS
• Grants are reimbursements for “Allowable” Costs – which means among other things, the cost must be:– Reasonable
• Prudent person standard for “nature or amount”• Ordinary and necessary for the program• Sound business practices etc
• Allocable – did it benefit the program to which it was charged
• Consistent Treatment• Determined in accordance with GAAP• Adequately Documented
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
45
Common Allocation Issues in Head Start
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
46
1. BLENDED FUNDING – ALWAYS BE AWARE OF YOUR SCOPE OF PROJECT
• HS Grantee uses other child care funding source to “overmatch”
• Provides a full day of Head Start Services • All children are enrolled in HS and receive
services that meet the Performance Standards• HS Grantee includes in proposed budget
reimbursement from other funding source• No cost allocation required from HS perspective
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
47
2. SHARED RESOURCES
Child Care Program Partnerships Head Start Program
• Non-HS eligible
• Performance Standards Not Required
• Cost allocations required if sharing resources with HS
• HS eligible
• Performance Standards Apply
• Cost allocation not necessarily required
• Raises cost allocation issues
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
48
3. PARALLEL FUNDING OR FLIP A SWITCH MODEL
• Grantee has two or more funding streams• UPK or other alternative funding source serves
non-HS eligible children; HS funds used for HS eligible children
• Need cost allocation to keep HS funds separate from non-HS funds– To ensure HS funds not spent on non-HS children
or services that don’t meet the Performance Standards
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
49
DISTINGUISH FROM PURCHASE OF SERVICES
• HS grantee purchases services through a contract with a child care provider, school district, etc., for HS eligible children at non-HS grantee location
• Contractor may also receive funds from other sources for day care services for non-HS eligible children
• Grantee must assure HS Program Performance standards are met for all HS children; not mandatory for non-HS children
• Services must be purchased at fair market value
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
50
Focusing on “shared” or “joint” costs
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
51
DIRECT ALLOCATION METHOD
Source: U.S. Dept. of Labor, Division of Cost Determination, Office of Acquisition Management Services Business Center, “A Guide for Indirect Cost Rate Determination.” available at: http://www.dol.gov/oasam/programs/boc/costdeterminationguide/cdg.pdf
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
52
DIRECT COSTS
“Direct costs are those costs that can be identified specifically with a particular final cost objective such as a Federal award, or other internally or externally funded activity, or that can be directly assigned to such activities relatively easily with a high degree of accuracy.”
2 C.F.R. § 200.413(a)/ 45 C.F.R. § 75.413(a)
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
53
FAQS – IRCAS – MANDATORY?
FAQ - Indirect Cost Rates and Entities Who Do Not Have Indirect Costs
Q. 2 C.F.R. § 200.210(a)(15), 2 C.F.R. § 200.331(a)(1)(xiii) and (a)(4) all make reference to indirect cost rates as a requirement for recipients and subrecipients. Not all entities charge indirect cost rates. Will they be forced to establish such rates?
A. No. NFEs that are able to allocate and charge 100% of their costs directly may continue to do so. Claiming reimbursement for indirect costs is never mandatory; a NFE may conclude that the amount it would recover thereby would be immaterial and not worth the effort needed to obtain it.
– COFAR, Nov. 26, 2014 FAQs
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
54
SIMPLIFIED INDIRECT ALLOCATION METHOD
Source: U.S. Dept. of Labor, Division of Cost Determination, Office of Acquisition Management Services Business Center, “A Guide for Indirect Cost Rate Determination.” available at: http://www.dol.gov/oasam/programs/boc/costdeterminationguide/cdg.pdf
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
55
INDIRECT (F&A) COSTS DEFINITION
“Indirect (Facilities and Administration or F&A) costs means costs incurred for a common or joint purpose benefitting more than one cost objective, and not readily assignable to the cost objectives specifically benefitted, without effort disproportionate to the results achieved…
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
56
INDIRECT (F&A) COSTS DEFINITION, CON’T
“…To facilitate equitable distribution of indirect expenses to the cost objectives served, it may be necessary to establish a number of pools of indirect (F&A) costs. Indirect (F&A) cost pools must be distributed to benefitted cost objectives on bases that will produce an equitable result in consideration of relative benefits derived.” 2 C.F.R. § 200.56/ 45 C.F.R. § 75.2
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
57
WHAT ARE INDIRECT COSTS?
“Typical” for non-profits – “depreciation on buildings and equipment, the costs of operating and maintaining facilities, and general administration and general expenses such as the salaries and expenses of executive officers, personnel administration and accounting”
But, because of “diverse characteristics and accounting practices of nonprofit organizations”, one size does not fit all!
Look to same rules as direct costs for identification - easily identified then direct, not easily identified then indirect
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
58
A VISUAL
Facilities
General G&A
Functional e.g., ECE
Dept.
Non-Federal
Grant 1
Grant 2
Costs to be Allocated Final Cost Objectives
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
59
What are they and do you want one?
Indirect Cost Rates
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
60
INDIRECT COST RATE AGREEMENTS
• What are they? • It is an agreement between you and the federal
government about how you will be reimbursed for certain costs:– Binding on Both Parties– Contains detailed (kind of) agreement on how to
allocate specified costs to final cost objectives using a specified allocation method
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
61
WHAT IS AN ICRA?
• An Indirect Cost Rate Agreement (“ICRA”) is negotiated between a grantee and its “cognizant” agency
• Purpose has always been to create uniformity of application
• Can be simple or complex – can have multiple rates such as administration, facilities, fringe benefit– But if you received more than $10M in direct federal
funding, you must have two rates: facilities and administration
• More Information: https://rates.psc.gov/
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
62
NEGOTIATION AND APPROVAL OF RATE AGREEMENT
• Indirect cost rate proposal – within 6 months of end of fiscal year depending on type of rate
• Results of negotiation formalized in Rate Agreement
• Disputes can be appealed
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
63
TYPES OF RATES
• Provisional – a billing rate• Final – final settlement of a provisional rate to
actual costs• Predetermined – a fixed rate based on actual
costs; not subject to adjustment except in “very unusual” circumstances
• Fixed w/carryforward – a fixed rate with adjustments in subsequent periods
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
64
RATES CAN BE CALCULATED IN DIFFERENT WAYS:
A cost pool divided by an allocation base:
Indirect Costs ÷ Direct Salaries and Wages
Indirect Costs ÷ Direct Salaries and Wages + Fringes
Indirect Costs ÷ Modified Total Direct Costs
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
65
WHAT IS THE DRIVING PRINCIPLE BEHIND SELECTION OF THE BASE?
Fairness!
“The essential consideration in selecting a method or a base is that it is the one best suited for assigning the pool of costs to cost objectives in accordance with benefits received; a traceable cause and effect relationship; or logic and reason, where neither the cause nor the effect of the relationship is determinable.”
Must be “equitable” to both federal and non-federal functions
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
66
NEGOTIATED INDIRECT (“F&A”) RATES
• 45 C.F.R. § 75.414(c)If a grantee has a negotiated indirect cost rate, then all Federal agencies are required to accept it unless there is a statutory, regulatory, or otherwise approved reason for deviation.– Note: Pass through entities also have to recognize their subs’
negotiated indirect cost rates between the sub and the feds if one exists (200.331(a)(4))
• 45 C.F.R. § 75.414(g) Gives entities a one-time extension of current negotiated indirect cost rates for up to four years subject to approval of the indirect cost cognizant agency. – But no reopening it during the four years, so you had better like it
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
67
200.414(F)/45 C.F.R. § 75.414(F)DE MINIMIS INDIRECT COST RATE
• Option: Take a minimum flat rate; can be a transition to a rate or may be used indefinitely
• Set rate: “[A]ny non-Federal entity that has never received a negotiated indirect cost rate … may elect to charge a de minimis rate of 10% of modified total direct costs (“MTDC”).
• Challenges: What does this pay for? Must be applied consistently
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
68
FAQS – LOWER RATE THAN 10%?
§200.331-6 Pass-through Entities and Indirect Cost Rate Negotiation
Q. This section states that pass-through entities are expected to honor a subrecipient’s negotiated F&A rate agreement, or use a 10% MTDC de minimis rate, or negotiate an F&A rate with the subrecipient. Is it acceptable to require a subrecipient to accept a rate lower than 10% MTDC via negotiation, or in lieu of their negotiated F&A rate? If a subrecipient requests to establish a rate via negotiation, does the pass-through entity have to establish a rate via negotiation?– Answer next slide
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
69
ANSWER ON MANDATING LOWER RATES
A. If the subrecipient already has a negotiated F&A rate with the Federal government, the negotiated rate must be used. It also is not permissible for pass-through entities to force or entice a proposed subrecipient without a negotiated rate to accept less than the de minimis rate. The cost principles are designed to provide that the Federal awards pay their fair share of the costs recognized under these principles. Pass-through entities may, but are not required, to negotiate a rate with a proposed subrecipient who asks to do so.– COFAR FAQs, Nov. 26, 2014
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
70
Final Thoughts on Direct Allocation – VERY Common in HS!
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
71
OUR VIEW
• YOU MUST HAVE (or in all probability) a Cost Allocation Plan . . .
• Statement of Purpose• General approach to costs (direct costs
charged directly, utilization of indirect cost rate, etc.)
• Describe sources of funding so that relationship to costs is clearly understandable
• Remember – A CAP is not a budget, but a process for charging costs.
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
72
OUR VIEW, CON’T.
What needs to be in a Cost Allocation Plan?Address specific items of cost and their allocation base such as:
– G&A or other shared Staff – salaries, leave, other fringe benefits
– Facilities– Professional services– Travel– Supplies– Utilities
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
73
OUR VIEW, CON’T.
What needs to be in a Cost Allocation Plan?Describe allocation base (methodology)Common allocation bases:
– Direct Labor– Modified Total Direct Costs– Useable Square Feet– Number of Children Enrolled– Attendance– Hours of Service
Frequency of Charges, biweekly, monthly, quarterlyRemember: Real (Actual) not Budgeted #s for your Base too!
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
74
OUR VIEW – ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS
Collection of Data– Accurate?– Easily Accessible?– Kept in Real time?
Functionality– Ease of Use– Is the program driving the train or the
accounting?
Explainability (yes, I made this word up!)
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
75
Questions?
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
76
Dawn of a New Day:
Time and Effort Under the Final Uniform Grants Guidance
LEARNING OBJECTIVES
• Review Changes in the Supercircular • The Goal of Time and Effort Reporting –
determining source of funds to pay salary and fringe benefits
• Urban Myths – woven throughout• How to do it and When to do it – Nuts and
Bolts• Compliance Strategies
77© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
78
Comments on T&E …
78© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
79
WHY YOU CARE . . .
Time and Effort findings have been common in OIG audits
Oversight of federal grant programs continues to increase, programmatic reviews now common occasionally using outside accounting firms – not to mention the OIG!
Financial consequences of non-compliance are substantial (can send you cases if you want!)
– i.e., give all the money back!
79© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
80
BASICS OF TIME & EFFORT
You are sending a bill to Uncle Sam for work by your employees and he wants to know what he is paying for…..
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
81
THREE DIFFERENT PIECES OF THE PUZZLE
1. Payroll – What it costs to have employees (salaries, fringe benefits, employment taxes etc.)
2. Time and Effort - “Personnel Activity Reports” or other documentation showing which intermediate or final cost objective is being charged (or accumulating) payroll costs
3. Charging Costs to Your Grant – When you go to Payment Management and drawdown federal funds to pay allowable costs
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
82
FIRST QUESTION – REFER BACK TO INDIRECT COST VISUAL…
How are these T&E reports going to be used?• Is it going to be used to charge costs to
intermediate or final cost objectives, e.g., are grants going to pay for their share of an employee’s salary and fringes based on the report?
-- OR –• Is it going to be used to charge all of the
employee’s S & FB to a single cost objective?
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
83
The Old Rules
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
COMPARE AND CONTRAST – OLD A-122 RULES
Four Required Elements for any employee charged “in whole or in part” to a federal award:
1. Actual Activity not budgeted; reasonable estimate of actual work performed
2. Account for the Total Activity of employee
3. Signature Requirements (employee or immediate supervisor with first-hand knowledge)
4. Frequency Requirements – at least monthly, coinciding with payroll
84© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
What Does An Old Personnel Activity Report Look Like?
Activity 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14Hours(Emp.)
% of Time(Attg.)
Head Start
Administration
WIC
???
Vacation
Sick
Holiday
Other Leave
Total Total
Total Hours 100%
Employee Name: Bi-Weekly Time Sheet: April 1 to 14, 2014
Employee Signature: (OR) Supervisor Signature:
Date: Date:
8585© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
86
EXCEPTION FOR GOVERNMENTS UNDER A-87
OMB Circ. A-87, (2 CFR part 225), App. B, ¶ 8(h)(3).
“Where employees are expected to work solely on a single Federal award or cost objective, charges for their salaries and wages will be supported by periodic certifications that the employees worked solely on that program for the period covered by the certification. These certifications will be prepared at least semi-annually and will be signed by the employee or supervisory official having first hand knowledge of the work performed by the employee.”
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
87
Time and Effort Under the Supercircular
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
88
NEW RULES FOR DOCUMENTATION OF T&E (75.430(I)(1))
Documentation must “accurately reflect the work performed”
Records must:
“(i) Be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated;
(ii) Be incorporated into the official records of the non-Federal entity;
(iii) Reasonably reflect the total activity for which the employee is compensated by the non-Federal entity, not exceeding 100% of compensated activities;
88© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
89
MORE ON NEW T&E DOCUMENTATION SYSTEMS…
“(iv) Encompass both federally assisted and all other activities compensated by the non-Federal entity on an integrated basis, but may include the use of subsidiary records as defined in the non-Federal entity’s written policy;
“(v) Comply with the established accounting policies and practices of the non-Federal entity; and”
[Yes, the Supercircular is missing number vi…]
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
90
MORE ON NEW T&E DOCUMENTATION SYSTEMS…
“(vii) Support the distribution of the employee’s salary or wages among specific activities or cost objectives if the employee
Works on more than one federal award; A federal award and non-federal award; An indirect cost activity and a direct cost activity; Two or more indirect activities which are allocated using
different allocation bases; Or an unallowable activity and a direct or indirect cost
activity.”
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
91
NEW TIME AND EFFORT, CONT.
“(viii) Budget estimates (i.e. estimates determined before the services are performed) alone do not qualify as support for charges to Federal awards, but may be used for interim accounting purposes, provided:”…
“(A) The system produces reasonable approximations of activity;
(B) Significant changes in the corresponding work activity are identified and entered into the records in a timely manner. Short term changes need not be considered as long as the distribution of salaries and wages is reasonable over the longer term; and
(C) Internal controls include processes to review after-the-fact interim charges made to a Federal award.”
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
92
ALTERNATIVES OR SUBSTITUTE SYSTEMS
For State, Tribal and Locals – still can use old RMTS and similar, statistically valid systems
For Everyone – two options:a) With federal approval “alternative proposals based on
outcomes and milestones for program performance where these are clearly documented”
b) Use “performance plans” to “incorporate funds from multiple federal awards and account for their combined use based on performance-oriented metrics, provided that such plans are approved in advance by all federal awarding agencies”
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS
93
94
A PROPOSED APPROACH:
• Employees who charge all of their time to one funding source or cost objective, use semi-annual certifications
• Employees who “distribute” their time to two or more funding sources or cost objectives use traditional “Personal Activity Reports”
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
95
SUMMARY
• Records must be kept for every employee charged to your federal awards– Even employees who work solely under one federal
award
• Records must reflect the total activity for employees and actual activity, including both federally-assisted work and all other activities
• Default measurement is still how much time the employee spent working on the grant
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
SO ESSENTIAL ELEMENTS OF A TIME AND EFFORT SYSTEM
Written Policies and Procedures that set out:– Purpose– Requirements
• Good Faith, “reasonable” Estimate• Frequency• Employees must use Independent Judgment
– Penalties for Non-compliance
Monitoring – Start with a simple checklist, did everyone turn in their time
sheets?– Internal integrity?
Training
9696© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
97
Questions?
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
98
Non-Federal Share (“Match”)
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
99
LEARNING OBJECTIVES
– Distinguish what items and services your program can count as match;
– Recognize how to document matching share;– Reinforce why showing "overmatch" makes
sense; and– Consider common and not-so-common pitfalls
to avoid.
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
100
COST SHARING OR MATCHING DEFINITION
45 CFR §75.2:
“Cost sharing or matching means the portion of project costs not paid by Federal funds (unless otherwise authorized by Federal statute). This may include the value of allowable third party in-kind contributions, as well as
expenditures by the recipient.”
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
101
YOUR FAVORITE SOURCES OF MATCH?
1._____________________________
2._____________________________
3._____________________________
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
102
COMMON AND UNCOMMON SOURCES
Common Sources of Match:– Volunteer Labor– Governance Functions– Free Space– State Funding
Uncommon Sources of Match– Donated Services from Specialists– Unrecovered Indirect Costs– Medicaid Payments
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
103
HEAD START ACT §640
“(b) Financial assistance extended under this subchapter for a Head Start program shall not exceed 80 percent of the approved costs of the assisted program or activities, except that the Secretary may approve assistance in excess of such percentage if the Secretary determines that such action is required in furtherance of the purposes of this subchapter.” 80%
20%
Non-FederalShare
Federal Award 80%
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
104
STATUTE: HEAD START ACT §640 (B), CON’T.
“Non-Federal contributions may be in cash or in kind, fairly evaluated, including plant, equipment, or services. The Secretary shall not require non-Federal contributions in excess of 20 percent of the approved costs of programs or activities assisted under this subchapter.”
We will discuss waivers at the end!
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
105
KEY CONCEPTS
Cash Match – grantee spending its own funds (however derived, such as a cash donation, income from a state program, etc.) to buy goods and services that benefit grantee’s Head Start program during the period match is claimed.
In-kind Match – (traditionally) grantee receives goods or services at little or no cost that it uses in its Head Start program during the period the match is claimed.
– But also can be – grantee donates supplies, equipment, property, etc. and uses it in the grantee’s Head Start program
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
106
WHAT ABOUT HS AND EHS TOGETHER?
“OHS – PC – A – 034
If a program operates both a Head Start and an Early Head Start program, is the 20% non-federal share requirement and the 15% administrative cap applied to both programs separately or to just the total program’s grant?
Head Start programs should strive to assure an equitable allocation of both non-federal share and administrative costs among Head Start and Early Head Start. However, grantees will be assessed for compliance with these requirements only against their total grant award (i.e. Head Start and Early Head Start).”
Just a reminder, though: Match is still counted towards or limited by 15% Administrative Cap.
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
107
KEY ISSUES FOR COUNTING MATCHING SHARE
Cost allowability
Valuation
Documentation
Three main considerations:
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
108
Allowability of Costs for Match
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
109
BASIC RULES . . . (MUST MEET ALL OF THESE)
1. Allowable under the Cost Principles including:– Ordinary and Necessary – “necessary and reasonable
for accomplishment of project or program objectives”– Verifiable “from the non-federal entity’s records” §
75.306(b)
2. No Fed to Fed: Are not paid by the Federal Government under another award, except where authorized by Federal statute to be used for cost sharing or matching.
3. No Double Count: i.e., are not included as contributions for any other federal award.
4. Included in approved Budget.
5. Conform to other provisions of the rules
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
110
BOILED DOWN
A cost is allowable if it is incurred in furtherance of program objectives
– For example, is this cost helping me meet one of the requirements under the Head Start Performance Standards?
Rule of Thumb: If I could spend Head Start money on X, but instead got X for free or I paid for it myself, then I can count the cost as match
PS: Unrecovered indirect costs can be counted if you have an indirect cost rate agreement.
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
111
Side Note: Program Income
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
112
WHAT IS PROGRAM INCOME?
Defined as “gross income earned by the recipient that is directly generated by a supported activity or earned as a result of the award . . . Program income includes, but is not limited to, income from fees for services performed, the use or rental of real or personal property acquired under federally-funded projects . . . Interest earned on advances of Federal funds is not program income.”
“With prior approval of the [federal agency], program income may be used to meet the cost sharing or matching requirements of the Federal award.” 45 CFR 75.307(e)(3)
Can you generate Program Income? And get approval to use as match?
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
113
INTERESTING NOTE FROM HHS GPS
“Unless restricted by statute or regulation, matching or cost sharing may be provided as direct and/or indirect costs, consistent with the recipient’s accounting system—and its usual method of charging for similar items—and any restrictions or limitations in the applicable cost principles. Recipient contributions may be derived from any non-Federal source; from Federal sources if received as fees, payments, or reimbursements for the provision of a specific service, such as patient care reimbursements received under Medicare or Medicaid; or from other program income, if authorized by the OPDIV (see Part II). Otherwise, unless there is specific statutory authority, Federal funds may not be used to match HHS grant funds.”
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
114
IN-KIND MATCH
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
115
CONSIDERATIONS FOR WHICH RULES TO APPLY…
Who is contributing?– Recipient (i.e., you are)– Volunteer/3rd Party
What is the contribution?– Services– Supplies – Equipment– Facilities
What is the purpose of the grant?– Acquisition– Operations
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
116
IF THE GRANT RECIPIENT IS DONATING SERVICES
§75.306(d) says “Values for non-Federal entity contributions of services and property must be established in accordance with the cost principles in Subpart E.”
So, for staff this means salary and fringe properly documented with time and effort reports.
Anything else, what did you pay for it? Is it expensed or capitalized/depreciated?
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
117
IF ANOTHER IS DONATING SERVICES
Is an individual making the donation of time or another organization?
If an individual donates his or her time:– Rates for volunteer services shall be consistent with those
paid for similar work in the recipient’s organization. – In those instances in which the required skills are not found …
use local labor rates for similar services.– In either case, paid fringe benefits that are reasonable,
necessary, allocable, and otherwise allowable may be included.”
– But, can count only “if the service is an integral and necessary part of an approved project or program.”
– See § 75.306(e)
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
118
IF ANOTHER IS DONATING SERVICES:
If another organization donates the time of its employees while they are being paid by that organization:
– services must be valued at the “employee’s regular rate of pay” plus allowable, allocable, reasonable and necessary “fringe benefits” and “indirect costs” (at either the other org’s approved federally negotiated indirect cost rate or a rate otherwise in accordance with the provisions of the Supercircular, i.e. de minimis rate) § 75.306(f).
– “[P]rovided these services employ the same skills for which the employee is normally paid.”
– If not, value according to previous slide.
– But, word of caution, service included in indirect subject to admin. Cap and must be accounted for in rate proposal…
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
119
COST ALLOWABILITY OF VOLUNTEER TIME
Board member time for participating in training or board meetings?
Allowable or Unallowable ?
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
120
POLICY CLARIFICATION OHS-PC-A-078
“Head Start agencies may claim [as] non-federal match the value of volunteer services of governing body and policy council members.”
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
121
WHAT ABOUT VALUATION AND ALLOCATION?
The value of governing bodies and advisory boards should be set internally based upon a reasonable value for the services provided. For example, Policy Council time might be valued using the Director’s salary as a rate. See Head Start Fiscal Assistant, 5/31/2007
“Policy Council time would be considered to be programmatic, however, Board or Tribal Council time could be considered an administrative match that is subject to the 15 percent limitation” See Non-Federal Share Narrative
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
122
COST ALLOWABILITY OF VOLUNTEER TIME
Activities between an enrolled Head Start child and that child’s parent either at home or at the center.
Allowable or Unallowable ?
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
123
POLICY CLARIFICATION OHS-PC-A-077
“A parent involvement activity that primarily benefits the parent and their child is not considered an allowable cost for an in-kind match.”
– Home visits including pre-natal, newborn or postpartum visits; – Staff-teacher conferences; – Socialization activities; – Parent education, orientation, or training; – Meetings and activities related to family goal setting with the
family partnership agreement; – Participation in specific activities that are related to a child’s
developmental or educational plan, Individualized Family Service Plan or Individualized Education Plan;
– Field trips; or – Transition meetings.
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
124
POLICY CLARIFICATION OHS-PC-A-077, CON’T.
“An activity that provides a good or service to benefit the program is considered an allowable cost for an in-kind match.”
– Participation in a health services advisory committee or other advisory committee;
– Participating in outreach efforts for recruitment; – Participating in community partnerships with other
parents or community members; – Supporting a lending library, health fair or other program
activity; – Providing assistance in a classroom or on a field trip; – Reviewing menus for the program; or – Participating in an employment interview.
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
125
POLICY CLARIFICATION OHS-PC-A-006
Parent Volunteer Activities at Home “If a Head Start child’s teacher (or home visitor) provides the child’s parents with written plans or guidance as to the types of activities that need to be done with the child at home in order to support the child’s Head Start experience these activities may, when fairly valued, be counted as non-federal share. The "countability" of the parent’s efforts hinge on doing things with the enrolled child that support the child’s Head Start experience, that are articulated by the teacher (or home visitor) and that support the curriculum used by the program. General parenting duties do not constitute activities that can be counted as non-federal share, unless these activities meet the requirements noted above. The valuation of the parent’s time should, unless a program can demonstrate otherwise, be valued at the rate of a teacher’s assistant.”
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
126
COST ALLOWABILITY OF VOLUNTEER TIME
Staff member volunteering for a Head Start related activity during non-paid time?
Allowable or Unallowable ?
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
127
COST ALLOWABILITY OF VOLUNTEER TIME
Staff member volunteering for a Head Start-related activity during non-paid time?
Just don’t do it!!!
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
128
DONATIONS
Discounts from vendors?Allowable or Unallowable ?
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
129
POLICY CLARIFICATIONS OHS – PC – A – 014
When a program has a vendor who gives discounts for their products to a Head Start program, can these discounts be used as non-federal share?
“This Policy Clarification is currently under review.”
But who cares b/c Philadelphia case (PPCC I, Dec. 31, 2009)
Good rule of Thumb, see old§ 92.24(b)(7)(iii)– More services for no more money or– Demonstrable “Cost Savings”
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
130
IF ANOTHER IS DONATING SUPPLIES
Supplies (including classroom supplies)
–Remember: Under federal definition of “supplies,” anything with an acquisition cost of less than $5,000 or useful life of less than a year is a supply.
–Use Fair Market Value • “at time of donation” 45 CFR 75.306(g)
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
131
IF ANOTHER IS DONATING EQUIPMENT
Use of Equipment – If loaned, may not exceed “fair rental value”
45 CFR 75.306(i)(4)
A Piece of Equipment – Must comply with prior approval requirements
($25,000 or more threshold) – FMV for same age and condition at the time of
donation
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
132
IF ANOTHER IS DONATING FACILITY
Land and Building – What is the purpose of grant?
If acquisition of Facilities (rare), then:
– “Aggregate value of the donated property may be claimed as cost sharing of matching”• 45 CFR 75.306(h)(1)
– BUT NOTE: Rincon San Luiseno Band of Mission Indians (DAB No. 1826): “fundamental principle of grants management that a grantee is required to document its costs”
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
133
IF ANOTHER IS DONATING FACILITY & TITLE PASSES TO GRANTEE
Land and Building
If purpose of grant is to operate a program that needs facilities (like most of you), then:
– “Normally only deprecation charges… may be made.”– “However, the… fair rental charges for land may be
allowed provided that the Federal awarding agency has approved the charges.”
– 45 CFR 75.306(h)(2)Value: can’t exceed FMV at time of donation as established by independent appraiser
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
134
FACILITIES WHERE TITLE IS HELD BY GRANTEE
HS Narrative: “Depreciation may be computed following any generally accepted method and is to be based on the acquisition cost of the building.” – see e.g., § 92.24 (e)(2)(ii) “based on property’s market value at the time it was donated.”
Now, what if Grantee owns property (no federal help in purchasing)?
– depreciation or use allowance plus operating costs
– Basis for depreciation or use calculation is purchase price of facility per cost principles
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
135
IF ANOTHER IS DONATING SPACE
The value of donated space must not exceed the fair rental value of comparable space as established by an independent appraisal of comparable space and facilities in a privately-owned building in the same locality.”
–45 CFR 75.306(i)(3)What is an independent appraisal?
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
136
DOCUMENTATION OF IN-KIND CONTRIBUTIONS
45 CFR § 75.434(d)
“To the extent feasible, services donated to the non-Federal entity will be supported by the same methods used to support the allocability of regular personnel costs.”
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
137
The Over / Under
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
138
WHAT IS AN OVERMATCH?
Central Piedmont Action Council, Inc.; DAB No. 1916 (April 16, 2004)
“The Board has recognized that a grantee may reduce or offset a disallowance by documenting that it incurred unclaimed, allowable and allocable costs that it paid for with its own funds. Campesinos Unidos, Inc.; Seminole Nation of Oklahoma. In effect, a grantee may substitute, for unallowable costs, allowable costs for which it did not claim federal funding. Additionally, because the Head Start statute requires a Head Start grantee to pay for 20% of its total approved Head Start costs with non-federal funds, a grantee seeking to reduce a disallowance by identifying unclaimed costs would have to establish that the unclaimed costs were distinct from and in addition to the 20% of total approved Head Start costs that grantees are required to pay with non-federal funds. 42 U.S.C. § 9835(b); 45 C.F.R. § 1301.20.”
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
139
SO…
• If you reach your 20%, don’t stop counting!• In-kind overmatch is protection against a
disallowance of some of your documentation for other In-kind;
• Cash overmatch is protection against a disallowance of federal funds; and
• Don’t promise to overmatch in your grant application.
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
140
REMINDER: NON-FEDERAL SHARE TIPS
Ask the following 3 questions:1. Would this expenditure be allowable if we were using
federal dollars? Reasonable? Ordinary? Necessary?
2. How much federal money would we spend to purchase the same goods or services?
What is the fair market value of the goods or services?3. How would we document this expenditure if we were
using federal funds? Documentation should be detailed and include receipts
and other verification if available (don’t just summarize!!!) Use the “same methods used by the recipient for its
own employees.” For example, use sign-in/sign-out sheet
Time should be recorded on a real-time basis after the fact
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
141
Questions?
Edward T. Waters, Esq.
May 12-13, 2015
Washington State Head Start Association – Day 2
Eligibility and Enrollment under New Regulations
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
143
Head Start Eligibility Final Rule
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
144
LEGAL FRAMEWORK
• Statute – Head Start Act takes priority over Regulations (e.g., the Performance Standards)
• Regulations – Eligibility and Enrollment (45 CFR Part 1305) Regulations untouched for 23 years until now
• Upshot: HS Act contained many changes that were not in regulations
• One last point – Notice and Comment Rulemaking, i.e., how regulations are issued is important context…
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
145
WHAT’S NEW? WHAT’S NOT?• New:
• Definitions• IVD• Record Retention• Training Requirements
• Same Old, Same Old• Eligibility Categories (mostly)• Age of Children (mostly)• Residency• Automatic Enrollment in future year or years
• Confusion – Lots Left to Clarify/Explain but we will do our best….
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
146
IMPLEMENTATION DEADLINES
• Revise and apply policies and procedures on or after March 12, 2015
• Train all staff “who determine eligibility” within 90 days of effective date or June 10, 2015
• Train all Board and Policy Council within 180 days of effective date or Sept. 8, 2015
• Will address what is in training and continuing obligations at end….
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
147
OVERVIEW OF PART 1305
1305.1 Purpose and scope
1305.2 Definitions (Note: Applies to all of Part 1305)
1305.3 Determining community strengths and needs
1305.4 Age of Children and family income eligibility
Determining, verifying and documenting eligibility
1305.5 Recruitment of children
1305.6 Selection process
1305.7 Enrolment and re-enrollment
1305.8 Attendance
1305.9 Policy on fees
1305.10 Compliance
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
148
1305.2 DEFINITIONS
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
149
NEW/REVISED DEFINITIONS
“. . . we added new definitions for: accepted, enrolled, foster care, homeless children, Migrant or
Seasonal Head Start Program, participant, relevant time period, and verify. We also revised these current definitions: enrollment, family, and
Head Start eligible. We believe our efforts here make the regulation easier to understand…”
80 Fed. Reg. 7369 (Feb. 10, 2015).
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
150
DEFINITIONS NOT INCLUDED
• “We did not define the phrase ‘‘is eligible for or, in the absence of child care, would be potentially eligible for public assistance.’’ We took the phrase directly from section 645(a)(1)(B)(i) of the Act. As always, we expect programs to continue to enroll the neediest families first.
• “We did not define average daily attendance because attendance is beyond the scope of this regulation. This regulation focuses on eligibility. It does not address attendance, which is addressed in another section of 45 CFR 1305.”
• We did not define eligibility period, but we clarified how long a participant remains eligible in §1305.4(k).”
• 80 Fed. Reg. 7370 (Feb. 10, 2015)© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
151
COMMENT ON ENROLLMENT
“Comment: One commenter asked why we require a child to attend at least one day of classes to be considered enrolled when the current definition for enrollment does not mention anything about attendance.
Response: In light of this comment, we redefined enrollment. And we defined enrolled and accepted. We referred to the PIR for guidance. In the PIR, a child or a pregnant woman is enrolled once they have attended class or received a service. A child or pregnant woman is considered accepted when they have met the eligibility criteria and have completed the process for enrolling in the program. Consequently, persons on Head Start waiting lists have been accepted but are not yet enrolled.”
80 Fed. Reg. 7370 (Feb. 10, 2015).
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
152
FIXED! ENROLLED AND ENROLLMENT
• New “Enrolled means a child has been accepted and attended at least one class, has received at least one home visit, or has received at least one direct service” “pending” completion of paperwork per state and local law. For EHS a pregnant woman who “has been accepted and received at least one direct service.”
• New “Accepted” means child or pregnant woman who meets eligibility criteria and has completed enrollment process. Persons on a waiting list, therefore, have been accepted but not yet enrolled
• Revised “Enrollment” means number of participants• New “Participant” means pregnant woman or child who is
enrolled and receives services
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
153
WHAT IS A DIRECT SERVICE?
Examples:• Screenings• Dental services• Mental health services• Any other service that is directly charged to
the grant…. • These services might be provided before the
child ever comes to class or receives a home visit
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
154
DISTINGUISH NEW ENROLLMENT DEFINITION FROM “ENTRY”
• 1304.20(a): “ entry means the first day that Early Head Start or Head Start services are provided to the child.”
• “In accordance with 45 CFR 1304.20(b), Head Start programs, in collaboration with parents, are required to begin completing screenings within 45 days of the child’s entry into the program. Entry into the program is defined as the first day the child enters the Head Start classroom, or begins to participate in a home based or family child care program.” OHS – PC – B – 018
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
155
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ENTRY AND ENROLLMENT
Enrolled
Entry
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
156
KNOWN UNKNOWNS
• What happens if an “enrolled” child does not show up for class? When can you withdraw acceptance?
• When do you count a slot as vacant? 1305.8(c) vacancy based on attendance:• “In circumstances where chronic absenteeism persists
and it does not seem feasible to include the child in either the same or a different program option, the child's slot must be considered an enrollment vacancy.”
• Tip: Policies and procedures should designate a window of time when the child or pregnant woman must come in to receive services and maintain slot
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
157
ERSEA TIMELINE BASED ON NEW DEFINITIONS
Recruitment/Outreach
Eligibility Determination
Acceptance
Selection
Enrollment or Waitlist
Entry
Attendance
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
158
1305.4 Determining, verifying and documenting eligibility.
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
159
LAYOUT OF NEW 1305.4 AS FOLLOWS:
a) Process overview
b) Age Eligibility
c) Income Eligibility
d) Additional Allowances
e) Additional Allowances for Indian Tribes
f) Categorical Eligibility requirements
g) Migrant or Seasonal eligibility requirements
h) Verifying age
i) Verifying income
j) Verifying categorical eligibility
k) Eligibility duration
l) Records
m) Program Policies and Procedures on violating eligibility determinations regulations
n) Training
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
160
WHO IS ELIGIBLE FOR HEAD START AND EARLY HEAD START?
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
161
TYPES OF ELIGIBILITY
INCOME ELIGIBILITY
Low IncomeA. Below 100% FPLB. Eligible for Public
Assistance
Over Income A. 100% - 130 % FPL or
“alternative criteria”B. Above 130% FPL
CATEGORICAL ELIGIBILITY
Homeless
Foster Care
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
162
PROCESS OVERVIEW – NEW SECT. 1305.4(A)
Remember: “IVD”• Interview
• In-person • Telephonic as backup
• Verify• Determine Eligibility
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
163
TOPICS TO COVER IN THE INTERVIEW
• Child’s age?• Family Size and income?• Family receiving “public assistance”• Foster care?• Homelessness?
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
164
Age Eligibility
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
165
AGE ELIGIBILITY 1305.4(b)
“(1) For Early Head Start, except when the child is transitioning to Head Start, a child must be an infant or a toddler younger than three years old. A pregnant woman may be any age. [seriously?]
(2) For Head Start, a child must:
(i) be at least three years old; or,
(ii) turn three years old by the date used to determine eligibility for public school in the community in which the Head Start program is located; and,
(iii) not be older than compulsory school age.
(3) For Migrant or Seasonal Head Start, a child must be younger than compulsory school age by the date used to determine public school eligibility for the community in which the program is located.”
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
166
NEW! AGE VERIFICATION 1305.4(h)
“Program staff must verify a child’s age according to program policies and procedures. A program’s policies and procedures cannot require staff to collect documents that confirm a child’s age, if doing so creates a barrier for the family to enroll the child.”
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
167
DOCUMENTS TO VERIFY AGE
Examples:
• Birth certificates• Baptism records• Medical records• Other?
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
168
Income Eligibility
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
169
TWO COMPONENTS TO DETERMINE INCOME ELIGIBILITY
Step 1: Determine size of family
Step 2: Calculate household income
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
170
NEW BIFURCATED DEFINITION OF “FAMILY”
45 CFR §1305.2 states for CHILDREN:
“Family, for a child, means all persons living in the same household who are:
(1) Supported by the child’s parent(s)’ or guardian(s)’ income; and
(2) Related to the child’s parent(s) or guardian(s) by blood, marriage, or adoption; or
(3) The child’s authorized caregiver or legally responsible party.”
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
171
NEW BIFURCATED DEFINITION OF “FAMILY”
45 CFR §1305.2 states for Pregnant Women:
“Family, for a pregnant woman, means all persons who financially support the pregnant woman.”
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
172
INCOME ELIGIBILITY 1305.4(c)
Income Eligible -
“(1) A pregnant woman or a child is eligible, if:
(i) the family’s income is equal to or below the poverty line; or,
(ii) the family is eligible or, in the absence of child care, would be potentially eligible for public assistance.”
We still don’t know what “potentially eligible” means!
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
173
PUBLIC ASSISTANCE 1305.4(i)(1)(ii)
• (Previously considered categorical eligibility)• Children eligible for public assistance • “Public assistance includes TANF and SSI. We
believe this is consistent with longstanding Head Start guidance…we have narrowly construed public assistance in the past and believe that our interpretation of public assistance is consistent with the overall thrust of the eligibility requirements, which emphasize serving children from families in the lowest income brackets.” Federal Register at 7372
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
174
INCOME ELIGIBILITY 1305.4(c) (CON’T)
Over-Income -
“(2) If the family’s income is above the poverty line, a program may enroll a pregnant woman or a child who would benefit from services. These participants can only make up to 10 percent of a program’s enrollment in accordance with (d).”
• Note: Special income eligibility rules for tribal grantees See 1305.4(e). No significant changes here
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
175
NEWISH ADDITIONAL ALLOWANCES 1305.4(d)
• Called in Preamble “Over-income” or “Alternate Criteria”
• You call it what you want!
“(1) A program may enroll an additional 35 percent of participants whose families are neither income nor categorically eligible and whose family incomes are below 130 percent of the poverty line, if the program…”
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
176
ADDITIONAL ALLOWANCES 1305.4(d)
• “(1)(i) establishes and implements outreach, and enrollment policies and procedures to ensure it is meeting the needs of income or categorically eligible pregnant women, children, and children with disabilities, before serving ineligible pregnant women or children”
• Don’t forget the rest of the required “Seven Habits” Reporting elements
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
177
Income VerificationWhere the Rubber Hits the Road
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
178
GENERAL RULE - FORMAL DOCUMENTATION 1305.4(i)
“(1) If the family can provide all W-2 forms, pay stubs, or pay envelopes for the relevant time period, program staff must:
– (i) use all family income for the relevant time period to determine eligibility according to income guidelines;
– (ii) state the family income for the relevant time period; and
– (iii) state whether the pregnant woman or child qualifies as low-income.”
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
179
INCOME VERIFICATION NO FORMAL DOCUMENTATION
“(2) If the family cannot provide all W-2 forms, pay stubs, or pay envelopes for the relevant time period, program staff may accept written statements from employers for the relevant time period and use information provided to calculate total annual income with appropriate multipliers.”
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
180
SO WHAT IS THE “RELEVANT TIME PERIOD”
§1305.2 Definition:
“(A) the 12 months preceding the month in which the application is submitted; or (B) during the calendar year preceding the calendar year in which the application is submitted, whichever more accurately reflects the needs of the family at the time of application.”
• But - - - under §1305.4(i)(5) “If the family can demonstrate a significant change in income for the relevant time period, program staff may consider current income circumstances.”
• So no real change here
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
181
WHERE ARE THE CHANGES?
• Determination of Family Size
• Documentation of Zero Income
• The Known Unknown– Families Paid in Cash– Public Assistance
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
182
FAMILY EXAMPLE
Question: What size is the family?
Mom and her three kids Mom’s boyfriend and his kid
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
183
INCOME VERIFICATIONNO INCOME
“(3) If the family reports no income for the relevant time period, a program may:
(i) accept the family’s signed declaration to that effect, if program staff:
(A) describes efforts made to verify the family’s income; and,
(B) explains how the family’s total income was calculated; or,
(ii) seeks information from third parties about the family’s eligibility, if the family gives written consent. If a family gives consent to contact third parties, program staff must adhere to program safety and privacy policies and procedures and ensure the eligibility determination record adheres to paragraph (l)(2)(ii)(C) in this section.”
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
184
PUBLIC ASSISTANCE –
“Some commenters asked us to explain how programs can determine a family’s potential eligibility for public assistance.”
Response:
“If a family gives written consent, the program could verify the family’s potential eligibility for public assistance with third parties, like TANF or SSI officials. Moreover, if a family does not have proof of income, the program can accept a family member’s written declaration that states the family is potentially eligible for public assistance. In these instances, program staffs are required to verify the family’s eligibility.”
Page 7372 of Federal Register Notice
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
185
OHS – PC – I – 016
How is eligibility for Head Start based on SSI determined?
If anyone in a prospective Head Start child’s family is receiving SSI, that child is considered income eligible for Head Start, irrespective of the child’s family’s income. Family members include the child, the child’s parent(s) or guardian(s) and any other person living in the child’s household who is supported by the income of the child’s parent(s) or guardian(s) and is related to the child’s parent(s) or guardian(s) by blood, marriage or adoption.
Requirement
Sec. 645(a) of the Head Start Act
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
186
INCOME VERIFICATIONNOTHING NEW HERE 1305.4(i)
“(4) If a child moves from an Early Head Start program to a Head Start program, program staff must verify the family’s income again.”
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
187
Categorical Eligibility- An independent reason for enrollment
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
188
NEW CATEGORICAL ELIGIBILITY 1305.4(f)
“(1) A family is categorically eligible for Head Start, if:
(i) the child is homeless, as defined in §1305.2; or,
(ii) the child is in foster care, as defined in §1305.2.
(2) If a program determines a child is categorically eligible under (1)(i) in this paragraph, it must allow the child to attend a Head Start program, without immunization and other medical records, proof of residency, birth certificates, or other documents. The program must give the family reasonable time to present these documents.”
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
189
NEW FOSTER CARE DEFINITION 1305.2
“Foster care means • 24-hour substitute care for children placed away from their
parents or guardians and for whom the state agency has placement and care responsibility.
• This includes, but is not limited to, placements in foster
family homes, foster homes of relatives, group homes, emergency shelters, residential facilities, child care institutions, and pre-adoptive homes... ”
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
190
FOSTER CARE (CON’T)
• “…A child is in foster care in accordance with this definition regardless of whether the foster care facility is licensed and payments are made by the state or local agency for the care of the child, whether adoption subsidy payments are being made prior to the finalization of an adoption, or whether there is Federal matching of any payments that are made.”
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
191
NEW HOMELESS DEFINITION 1305.2
“Homeless children means the same as homeless children and youths in section 725(2) of the McKinney-Vento Homeless Assistance Act at 42 U.S.C. 11434a(2). The definition in this regulation also applies to Migrant or Seasonal Head Start programs.”
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
192
MCKINNEY-VENTO: “HOMELESS CHILDREN AND YOUTHS”
(a) Means individuals who “lack a fixed, regular, and adequate nighttime residence” . . . and
(b) Includes -
“i) Children and youths who are sharing the housing of other persons due to loss of housing, economic hardship, or a similar reason; are living in motels, hotels, trailer parks, or camping grounds due to lack of alternative adequate accommodations; are living in emergency or transitional shelters; are abandoned in hospitals; or are awaiting foster care placement;
ii) Children and youths who have a primary nighttime residence that is a public or private place not designed for or ordinarily used as a regular sleeping accommodation for human beings. . .;
iii) Children and youths who are living in cars, parks, public spaces, abandoned buildings, substandard housing, bus or train stations, or similar settings; and
iv) Migratory children . . . who qualify as homeless because they are living in circumstances described in clauses (i) through (iii) above.”
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
193
HOMELESS ELIGIBILITY DETERMINATIONS
Sample questions (cont.)
Regular – Do you stay in the same place every night?– Do you have a key to the place where you are
living?– Do you move around a lot?– How long have you been at that place? How
long do you plan to stay?– How long did you live in your last place?
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
194
HOMELESS ELIGIBILITY DETERMINATIONS
Sample questions (cont.)Adequate
– Are you and your children sharing a room? How many people are staying in one room?
– Are you and your children sleeping in a bedroom, or in a public area, like a dining room?
– Does the home have heat/electricity/running water?– What condition is the home in? Does it keep out rain
and wind? Is it safe? Is it warm and dry?– Can you come and go as you please?
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
195
CATEGORICAL VERIFICATION 1305.4 (j)FORMAL DOCUMENTATION
(1) A family can prove categorical eligibility, with:
(i) a court order or other legal or government-issued document or a written statement from a government child welfare official demonstrating the child is in foster care;
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
196
CATEGORICAL VERIFICATIONSERVICE PROVIDERS ETC.
“(ii) a written statement from a homeless services provider, school personnel, or other service agency attesting that the child is homeless or any other documentation that indicates homelessness, including documentation from a public or private agency, a declaration, information gathered on enrollment or application forms, or notes from an interview with staff to establish the child is homeless, as defined in §1305.2 or,
(iii) any other document that establishes categorical eligibility.”
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
197
CATEGORICAL VERIFICATION 1305.4 (j)NO DOCUMENTATION
“(3) If a family cannot provide one of the documents described in (j)(1) to prove the child is homeless, a program may accept the family’s signed declaration to that effect, if, in a written statement, program staff:
(i) describes the efforts made to verify that a child is homeless, as defined in §1305.2;and,
(ii) describes the child’s living situation, including the specific condition described in §1305.2 under which the child was determined to be homeless. “ © 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
198
CATEGORICAL VERIFICATION 1305.4 (j)THIRD PARTIES
“(4) Program staff may seek information from third parties who have first-hand knowledge about a family’s categorical eligibility, if the family gives consent. If the family gives consent to contact third parties, program staff must adhere to program safety and privacy policies and procedures and ensure the eligibility determination record adheres to paragraph (l) (2)(ii)(C) in this section.”
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
199
MIGRANT OR SEASONAL HEAD START PROGRAM 1305.2
“(A) with respect to services for migrant farmworkers, a Head Start program that serves families who are engaged in agricultural labor and who have changed their residence from one geographic location to another in the preceding 2-year period; and
(B) with respect to services for seasonal farmworkers, a Head Start program that serves families who are engaged primarily in seasonal agricultural labor and who have not changed their residence to another geographic location in the preceding 2-year period.”
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
Eligibility Duration
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com 200
201
ELIGIBILITY DURATION 1305.4(k)
• Same as Head Start Act§645(a)(1)(B)(v)• “(1) If a child is determined eligible under this section
and is participating in a Head Start program, he or she will remain eligible through the end of the succeeding program year.”
• (2) If a program operates both an Early Head Start and a Head Start program, and the parents wish to enroll their child who has been enrolled in the program’s Early Head Start, the program must ensure, whenever possible, the child receives Head Start services until enrolled in school.”
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
202
Verification Records
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
203
RECORDS 1305.4 (l)
(1) “A program must keep eligibility determination records for each participant and on-going training records for program staffs. A program may keep these records electronically.
(2) Each eligibility determination record must include:
(i) copies of any documents or statements, including declarations, that are deemed necessary to verify eligibility under paragraphs (h) - (j) of this section;”
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
204
RECORDS (CON’T)
“(ii) a statement that program staff has made reasonable efforts to verify information by:
(A) conducting either an in-person, or a telephonic interview with the family as described under paragraph (a) of this section;
(B) describing efforts made to verify eligibility, as required under paragraphs (h) - (j) of this section; and,
(C) collecting documents required for third party verification under paragraphs (i)(3)(ii) and (j)(4) of this section, that includes:
(1) the family’s written consent to contact each third party;
(2) the third parties’ names, titles, and affiliations; and,
(3) information from third parties regarding the family’s eligibility.”
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
205
RECORDS (CON’T)
“(iii) a statement that identifies whether:
(A) the family’s income is below income guidelines for its size, and lists the family’s size;
(B) the family is eligible for or, in the absence of child care, potentially eligible for public assistance;
(C) the child is homeless child, as defined at §1305.2 including the specific condition described in §1305.2 under which the child was determined to be homeless;
(D) the child is in foster care;
(E) the family meets the over-income requirement in paragraph (c)(2) of this section; or,
(F) the family meets alternative criteria under paragraph (d) of this section.”
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
206
RECORDS (CON’T)
“(3) A program must keep eligibility determination records:
(i) for those currently enrolled, as long as they are enrolled; and,
(ii) for one year after they have either stopped receiving services; or,
(iii) are no longer enrolled.”
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
207
PROGRAM POLICIES AND PROCEDURES1305.4 (m)
“Program policies and procedures on violating eligibility determination regulations. A program must establish policies and procedures that describe all actions taken against staff who intentionally violate federal and program eligibility determination regulations and who enroll pregnant women and children that are not eligible to receive Early Head Start or Head Start services.”
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
208
TRAINING REQUIREMENTS
(i) “include methods on how to collect complete and accurate eligibility information from families and third party sources;
(ii) incorporate strategies for treating families with dignity and respect and for dealing with possible issues of domestic violence, stigma, and privacy; and,
(iii) explain program policies and procedures that describe actions taken against staff, families, or participants who intentionally attempt to provide or provide false information.”
45 C.F.R. §1305.4(n)© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
209
• Thing 1: What is our Business Process?– Ps & Ps– Training– Implementation– Monitoring
• Thing 2: Guiding Principles– Rule of Reason– What did you do?– Why did you do it?– Create your Legacy – Audit Trail?– Consistency – Like to Like
THE CAT IN THE HAT
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
210
BUILDING BLOCKS FOR A COMPLIANT SYSTEM
• Intake Form• Intake Procedures• Code of Conduct• Training• Monitoring System
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
211
Questions?
© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
212© 2015 Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved. | www.ftlf.com
CONTACT INFORMATION
Edward (Ted) Waters(202) 466-8960