Educator Effectiveness System - Hawaii DOE Forms/ELI/Breakout Session 12 EES.pdfProfessionalism All...
41
Educator Effectiveness System: Empowering educators to be informed and active in developing and enhancing their own professional practice. Tammie Picklesimer Joshua Lee Candice Frontiera Dale Asami 7/17/2013 1
Transcript of Educator Effectiveness System - Hawaii DOE Forms/ELI/Breakout Session 12 EES.pdfProfessionalism All...
Educator Effectiveness
System: Empowering educators to be informed and
active in developing and enhancing their
own professional practice.
Tammie Picklesimer
Joshua Lee
Candice Frontiera
Dale Asami
7/17/2013 1
State Priority Strategies
State
Priority Strategies
Induction &
Mentoring
Academic Review Teams
STEM
Formative
Instruction
Comprehensive
Student
Supports
Common Core
7/17/2013 2
Educator
Effectiveness
Systems
Goals for this Session
• Familiarize ourselves
with the EES manual
• Gain a deeper
understanding of the
EES design
• Discuss next steps for
administrators to be
successful
7/17/2013 3
Purpose of the EES
• Establish a common understanding of
expectations for teacher performance
• Provide fair, consistent, and accurate
evaluations
• Empower educators to be informed and active
in developing their own practice
• Recognize and reward effective teaching
7/17/2013 4
Core Design Principles • Incorporate multiple measures of performance that captures a
variety of perspectives
• Allow teachers to be reflective and improve by providing descriptive data that provides meaningful and credible feedback
• Develop a design that is transparent and easy to communicate
• Establish clear and rigorous expectations that prioritize student learning
• Support teachers’ growth through a fair and equitable system
7/17/2013 5
7/17/2013 6
Teacher Classification
7
Classroom Teachers of Tested Grades and
Subjects
(ELA and Math grades 4-8)
Classroom Teachers of Non-Tested
Grades and Subjects
Non-Classroom Teachers
(School Level)
Non-Classroom Teachers
(Non-School Level)
7/17/2013
Measure Weights
7/17/2013 8
Multiple Measures
Teacher Practice
Student Growth
and Learning
• Core
Professionalism
• Classroom
Observations
• Tripod Student
Survey
• Working
Portfolio (non-classroom)
• Hawaii Growth
Model
• Student
Learning
Objectives
7/17/2013 9
Expectations for 2013 - 2014
10
Core
Professionalism
All teachers will document and submit evidence of their
professionalism.
Classroom
Observations
Each classroom teacher will receive 2 observations per
year, 1x in fall and 1x in spring.
Tripod Student
Surveys
Each classroom teacher will have students surveyed,
1x in fall and 1x in spring.
Hawaii Growth
Model
Classroom teachers of tested grades/subjects will receive
growth data for all of their students.
Student
Learning
Objectives
All teachers will complete 2 SLOs. Classroom teachers will
select one to count for their evaluation.
Roster
Verification
Classroom teachers in all grades/subjects will complete
roster verification for each Tripod administration.
Classroom teachers of tested grades/subjects will
complete roster verification for the Hawaii Growth Model.
Timetable for 2013-2014
11 7/17/2013
8/12-8/30 9/23-10/18
1/13-1/31 3/3-3/14
3/24-4/25
All Teachers Complete
EES intro 7/31
Final EES Ratings
Released 5/23
Hawaii Adapted Framework for Teaching Based on Charlotte Danielson’s 2013 Evaluation
Instrument Component-Level Rubrics
7/17/2013 12
Core Professionalism
Acknowledges the value of teacher dedication and the
numerous contributions teachers make to their
profession and their schools
Expectations:
7/17/2013 13
Core
Professionalism
All teachers will document and submit evidence of their
professionalism.
Core Professionalism
• Distinguished: 4 Points
• Proficient: 3 Points
• Basic: 2 Points
• Unsatisfactory: 0 Points
Levels of Performance
7/17/2013 14
EES Final Evaluation for Classroom Teachers
7/17/2013 15
Sample Core Professionalism Rating
Core Professionalism
4f Proficient
Rating 7/17/2013 16
3
Classroom Observations
Working Portfolios
Acknowledges the value of targeted feedback based on
clear performance expectations and evidence
Expectations:
7/17/2013 17
Classroom
Observations
Each classroom teacher will receive 2 observations per
year, 1x in fall and 1x in spring.
Working Portfolio Non-classroom teacher will assemble a portfolio
instead of classroom observations.
Classroom Observations/Working Portfolios
• Distinguished: 4 Points
• Proficient: 3 Points
• Basic: 2 Points
• Unsatisfactory: 0 Points
Levels of Performance
7/17/2013 18
Sample Classroom Observation Ratings
7/17/2013 19
Component First Cycle Second Cycle Average
2b Basic
2d Proficient
3b Basic
3c Basic
3d Unsatisfactory
Rating
2
3
2
2
0
Proficient
Proficient
Proficient
Basic
Basic
3
3
3
2
2
2.5
3.0
2.5
2.0
1.0
2.2
Working Portfolios
7/17/2013 20
Sample Working Portfolio Rating
Component Working
Portfolio
Rating
2a Basic 2
2b Proficient 3
3a Distinguished 4
3b Proficient 3
3c Basic 2
Rating 2.8
7/17/2013 21
Student Surveys
Tripod Student
Surveys
Each classroom teacher will have students surveyed,
1x in fall and 1x in spring.
Roster
Verification
Classroom teachers in all grades/subjects will complete
roster verification for each Tripod administration.
Acknowledges the value of student perceptions as an
essential gauge of school and classroom quality
Expectations:
7/17/2013 22
Student Survey
NCE
(Lower/Upper
Elementary or
Secondary)
NCE
(Lower/Upper
Elementary or
Secondary)
Final NCE
Caring
Controlling
Clarifying
Challenging
Captivating
Conferring
Consolidating
Caring
Controlling
Clarifying
Challenging
Captivating
Conferring
Consolidating
Composite
Favorability
Percentage
Composite
Favorability
Percentage
7/17/2013 23
EES Rating Final NCE Range
4 69-99
3 33-68
2 24-32
1 1-23
Sample Student Survey
NCE Upper
Elementary
49
NCE Upper
Elementary
59
Final NCE
54 Construct Spring 2014 Results
(percent agreement)
Caring 72
Controlling 50
Clarifying 47
Challenging 57
Captivating 68
Conferring 50
Consolidating 65
Construct Fall 2013 Results
(percent agreement)
Caring 70
Controlling 54
Clarifying 43
Challenging 55
Captivating 62
Conferring 45
Consolidating 57
Composite
Favorability
Percentage
56
Composite
Favorability
Percentage
58
7/17/2013 24
EES Rating Final NCE Range
4 69-99
3 33-68
2 24-32
1 1-23
Hawaii Growth Model
Acknowledges the value of student growth and the
belief that teachers deserve to be recognized for the
gains students make
Expectations:
Hawaii Growth
Model
Classroom teachers of tested grades/subjects will receive
growth data for all of their students.
Roster
Verification
Classroom teachers of tested grades/subjects will
complete roster verification for the Hawaii Growth Model.
7/17/2013 25
Hawaii Growth Model
4 points ≈ 81-99
3 points ≈ 16-80
2 points ≈ 6-15
1 point ≈ 1-5
Te
ac
her
Pe
rce
nti
le R
an
k
Median Student Growth
Percentile
Individual Student Growth Percentiles
73
84
7/17/2013 26
Student Learning Objectives
Student
Learning
Objectives
All teachers will complete 2 SLOs. Classroom
teachers will select one to count for their
evaluation.
Acknowledges the value of high expectations for
student achievement and the process of linking
planning, classroom instruction, and assessment with
student outcome goals
Expectations:
7/17/2013 27
Student Learning Objectives
Highly Effective: 4 Pts. Effective: 3 Pts. Developing: 2 Pts. Ineffective: 1 Pt.
Incomplete: 0 Pts.
7/17/2013 28
Sample SLO Rating
Student Learning Objective 1
Rating 2
Student Learning Objective 2
Rating 3
Student Learning Objective Selected to be Counted for
Evaluation
Rating 3
7/17/2013 29
Summative EES Rating
Teacher Practice
Student Growth
and Learning
• Core
Professionalism
• Classroom
Observations
• Tripod Student
Survey
• Working
Portfolio (non-classroom)
• Hawaii Growth
Model
• Student
Learning
Objectives
7/17/2013 30
Summative EES Rating
• Core 15%
Professionalism
• Classroom 25%
Observations
• Tripod Student
Survey 10%
• Working
Portfolio (non-classroom)
• Hawaii Growth
Model 25%
• Student
Learning
Objectives 25%
Teacher Practice
Student Growth
and Learning
7/17/2013 31
Summative EES Rating
• Core 3
Professionalism
• Classroom 2.2
Observations
• Tripod Student
Survey 3
• Working
Portfolio (non-classroom)
• Hawaii Growth
Model 4
• Student
Learning
Objectives 3
Teacher Practice
Student Growth
and Learning
3.5
Rounded
4
2.6
Rounded
3 7/17/2013 32
Scoring Matrix
7/17/2013 33
EES Final Evaluation for Classroom Teachers
7/17/2013 34
Final Ratings Are Captured and Reported on PDE3
7/17/2013 35
Immediate Next Steps for Administrators
Danielson
• Attend training series for provisional certification
• Ensure all teachers receive 1-Day Introduction to the
Framework and the EES Overview training
• Schedule conferences and observations early
• Communicate Core Professionalism deadlines
• Show optional video to demonstrate the observation process
7/17/2013 37
Immediate Next Steps for Administrators
Non-Classroom
• Ensure non-classroom teachers complete role-specific training
module
• Schedule working portfolio conferences early
7/17/2013 38
Immediate Next Steps for Administrators
Tripod
• Review videos, manuals,
and guidelines on the EES
Website
• Complete online form to
designate school based
team
• Ensure appropriate
individuals complete PDE3
course
Immediate Next Steps for Administrators
Hawaii Growth Model
• Communicate the need for classroom teachers keep accurate
student enrollment records (when students enter and exit)
• Lead efforts to analyze growth model data available through
SchoolView
7/17/2013 40
Questions?
7/17/2013 41
