Education Service Workshops Key Stage 3 The English Civil · PDF fileLearning Curve Education...

Learning CurveEducation Service Workshops Key Stage 3

Learning Curve

ContentsTeachers notes 2

Document: John Rushworth, Historical Collections, Vol III, 1639-1640,p.1263. Published in London 5A petition from the citizens of London, September 1640Transcript 6

Document: SP 16/ 427/ 32 8A legal complaint made by Sir Richard Strode about ‘ship money’, August 1639Transcript 9

Document: by permission of the British Library, E.365 (6) 10An engraving of a protest in Edinburgh in 1637Transcript 10

Document: SP 45/ 10/ 225 11An announcement from Charles to the people of Scotland,May 1639Transcript 12

Document: SP 16/ 485/ 58 13Report of rebellion in Ireland, November 1641Transcript 14

Document: SP 16/ 474/ 15A document setting out the wishes of Parliament,December 1640Transcript 16

Document: SP 16/ 488/ 25 17Charles’ I speech to Parliament demanding the five MPs but they have withdrawn, 4th January 1642Transcript 18

Document: SP 16/ 474/ 8 20A committee considering the safety of the kingdom after the arrest of the 5 members; it is a printed leaflet from parliament, 12th January 1642Transcript 21

Worksheet 23

The English Civil Wars:Whose side are you on?

2

Teacher’s notesAims of workshop:This videoconference aims to help students investigate and understand the causes of the English Civil Wars.

Students will take part in a debate with actors playing the roles of Puritan Adam Wright and Royalist Bishop

Richard Hyde, to discuss the different views of the causes behind these events.

Documents• Document: John Rushworth, Historical Collections, Vol III, 1639-1640, p.1263. Published in

London

A petition from the citizens of London, September 1640

• Document: SP 16/ 427/ 32

A legal complaint made by Sir Richard Strode about ‘ship money’, August 1639

• Document: by permission of the British Library, E.365 (6)

An engraving of a protest in Edinburgh in 1637

• Document: SP 45/ 10/ 225

An announcement from Charles to the people of Scotland, May 1639

• Document: SP 16/ 485/ 58

Report of rebellion in Ireland, November 1641

• Document: SP 16/ 474/ 8

A document setting out the wishes of Parliament, December 1640

• Document: SP 16/ 488/ 25

Charles’ I speech to Parliament demanding the five MPs but they have withdrawn, 4th January 1642

• Document: SP 16/ 488/ 52

A committee considering the safety of the kingdom after the arrest of the 5 members; it is a printed

leaflet from parliament, 12th January 1642

Resources• Resource 1: This worksheet can be used to help students plan their arguments for debate

• Resource 2: Video clips of reconstructions using actors, giving their opinion about the causes of the

English Civil Wars.

Preparation activityStudents must have completed this activity before the workshop, so that they are fully prepared for the

session.

To prepare for the videoconference, divide the class into two for debate. Half of the students should assume

the roles of Puritans, and the other half should take the roles of Royalists.

Give students a copy of the worksheet and a copy of A petition from the citizens of London, taken from

Rushworth’s collections. Students should identify the main arguments for the causes of the English Civil Wars

in this document. Puritans will support the arguments set out in this document, whilst Royalists will object to

these points.

The four main points of debate as listed in the Petition are:

Learning CurveEducation Service Workshops The English Civil Wars: whose side are you on?

http://www.learningcurve.gov.uk/civilwar/g3/activity/videos/

3

• Taxes: Ship money and trade

• Religion

• Foreign affairs: Scotland, Ireland

• Parliament

For example:

Point 1: Taxes: Ship money and trade

A Puritan might argue:

• That ship money is outdated

• It should not include inland areas

• People should not be punished for refusing to pay unfair taxes

• Many MPs have fought against ship money, and that some officials will not collect it

A Royalist might argue:

• It is not a new tax, but a traditional tax

• It is for the protection of the Kingdom

• If people do not pay taxes, they should be punished

• How can the King make money if Parliament won’t support the taxes

Once students have identified the main points for debate from the Petition, they should then be given

opportunity to study the other documents included in this pack to further support their argument.

The workshopThe videoconference will introduce students to Puritan Adam Wright and Royalist Bishop Richard Hyde. They

will begin the session by briefly explaining their position on the current situation with King and Parliament.

They will then invite a student from each side, Puritan and Royalist, to start the debate, by putting forward

their arguments. The actors will help students to develop these points, and will encourage interaction

between the two sides.

Background informationThe document A petition from the citizens of London, September 1640 is taken from John Rushworth’s

‘Historical Collections, Vol III, 1639-1640’.

Rushworth joined the side of Cromwell in his criticism of King Charles I. In 1641, he became Secretary to the

General of the New Model Army and Secretary to the Council of War. He accompanied General Fairfax was

present at celebrations to mark the end of the Civil War in 1648. Rushworth was involved in organising the

King’s trial and later, his execution. After the death of Charles I, he became Oliver Cromwell’s personal

secretary. Rushworth’s ‘Historical Collections’ was completed in 1659 and was dedicated to Richard

Cromwell.

For further information about John Rushworth, visit:

http://www.rushworth.com/jr/index.html


4

Suggested follow-up activityStudents can visit the Learning Curve exhibition on the English Civil Wars, where they will find further

documents and video clips. They can evaluate the reliability of the video reconstructions, considering the

points raised about the causes of war, and how well these points are backed up by the original sources.

Knowledge, skills, and understanding• Knowledge and understanding of events, people, and changes in the past.

• Historical interpretation.

• Historical enquiry.

• Organisation and communication.

QCA Schemes of workUnit 8 - Section 3: How do historians disagree about the cause of the civil wars?

Useful linksLearning Curve exhibition: Civil War

More information on our workshops

Book a workshop

Please note that some of ‘The English Civil Wars’ workshops are advertised and booked on the Global Leap

website


http://www.learningcurve.gov.uk/civilwar/

http://www.learningcurve.gov.uk/civilwar/

http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/educationservice/video.htm

http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/contact/form/educationserviceform.asp?id=7&action=1

http://www.global-leap.com/

Document: John Rushworth, Historical Collections, Vol III, 1639-1640, p.1263.Published in London, 1680-1701


5


6


Transcript: John Rushworth, Historical Collections, Vol III, 1639-1640, p.1263.Published in London, 1680-1701)


To the King's Most Excellent MAJESTY.

The humble Petition of your Majesties Subjects the Citizens of LONDON.

Most Gracious Soveraign,

Being moved with the duty and obedience by which the Laws your Petitioners owe unto your Sacred Majesty,

they humbly present unto your Princely and pious wisdom, the several pressing grievances following; viz.

The pressing and unusual Impositions upon Merchandize, Importing and Exporting, and the urging and

Levying of Ship-money, notwithstanding both which, Merchants Ships and Goods have been taken and

destroyed both by Turkish and other Pirates.

The multitude of Monopolies, Patents and Warrants, whereby Trade in the City and other parts of the

Kingdom is much decayed.

The sundry Innovations in matters of Religion.

The Oath and Canons lately enjoyned by the late Convocation whereby your Petitioners are in danger to be

deprived of their Ministers.

The great concourse of Papists, and their Inhabitations in London, and the Suburbs, whereby they have more

means and opportunity of Plotting and Executing their designs against the Religion established.

The seldom Calling, and suddain dissolutions of Parliaments, without the redress of your Subjects

Grievances.

The Imprisonment of divers Citizens for non-payment of Ship-Money and Impositions, and the prosecution of

many others in the Star-Chamber, for not conforming themselves to Committees in Patents and Monopolies,

whereby Trade is restrained.

The great danger your Sacred person is exposed unto in the present War, and the various fears that seized

upon your Petitioners, and their Families by reason thereof, which grievances and fears have occasioned so

great a stop and direction in Trade, that your Petitioners can neither Buy, Sell, receive, or pay as formerly,

and tends to the utter Ruine of the Inhabitants of the City, the decay of Navigation, and Cloathing, and the

Manufactures of this Kingdom.

7

Simplified transcript: John Rushworth, Historical Collections, Vol III, 1639-1640, p.1263. Published in London, 1680-1701)


To the King's most excellent Majesty.

The humble petition of your Majesty's subjects, the citizens of London.

Most gracious Sovereign,

Because of the duty and obedience which we owe to your sacred Majesty, we humbly present to your

princely wisdom the following complaints:

(point 1) The demanding and unusual taxes upon goods, importing and exporting, and the taking of ship

money [a type of tax], despite merchants' ships and goods having been taken and destroyed by Turkish and

other pirates.

(point 2) The many monopolies, patents and warrants, causing trade in the city and other parts of the

kingdom to decline. [Monopolies, patents and warrants were types of permission from the king granting the

holder some kind of right that gave them a business advantage over others.]

(point 3) The many changes in matters of religion.

(point 4) The recent changes in church rules which mean we may be deprived of our ministers.

(point 5) The great crowd of Catholics living in London and the suburbs, where they have more means and

opportunity of plotting against the established religion.

(point 6) The seldom calling and sudden ending of Parliaments, without sorting out your subjects' complaints.

(point 7) The imprisonment of various citizens for non-payment of ship money and taxes, and the prosecution

of many others in the Star Chamber for not following the rules regulating trade.

(point 8) The great danger you are exposed to in the present war, and the various fears that we and our

families have because of the war, have led to such a drop in trade that we cannot buy, sell, receive or pay as

before. This tends to the utter ruin of the people living in the city, the decline of shipping and cloth making,

and the products of this kingdom.


8


Document: SP 16/427/32A legal complaint made by Sir Richard Strode about ‘ship money’, August 1639

Source a

Source b

9


Transcript: SP 16/427/32

A legal complaint made by Sir Richard Strode about ‘ship money’, August 1639

Source aWe present that whereas it is enacted 34.Ed.1. that noe tallage or ayd shall be layd or levyed by the King, or

his Heyrs, with out the good will, and Assent of the Lords, and Commons &c And whereas 25.Ed.3. its

enacted that from thenceforth none shall be compelled to make any Loanes to the King against his will, …

Source byet nevertheless contrary to the said Lawes, and Liberties, one Cow worth 4l 10s 0 being the Goods of Sir

Richard Stroad of Plimton St Mary in this county of Kent, by colour of an unlawfull and unreasonable Rates

made Symon Hele, a Guard & others was by Thomas Row a Constable of the said parish taken, and sold for

the Kings Majesties Service on 23d Marlij last at Newingham in the sayd parish to rayse Rates made, for the

setting forth of Shipping without Consent in Parliament.

Richard Stroade

Simplified transcript

Source aLaws were passed in the reign of Edward I that no tax shall be taken by the king or his heirs without the good

will and agreement of the Lords and Commons. In the reign of Edward III another law said that no one shall

be forced to make any loans to the king against his will, …

Source bYet contrary to these laws and freedoms, one cow worth £4 10 shillings, belonging to Sir Richard Strode of

Plimton St Mary in the county of Kent, because of unlawful and unreasonable taxes made by Symon Hele, a

guard, and others, was taken by Constable Thomas Row and sold for the king's service on 23rd March at

Newingham to raise money for shipping, without the consent of Parliament.

Richard Strode

10


Document: by permission of the British Library, E.365 (6)

An engraving of a protest in Edinburgh in 1637

TranscriptThe Arch-Prelate of St Andrewes in Scotland reading the new Service-booke in his pontificalibus assaulted by

men & women, with Cricketts Stooles Stickes and Stones

Simplified transcriptThe archbishop of St Andrews in Scotland reading the new service book, assaulted by men & women with

footstools, stools, sticks and stones.

11


Document: SP 45/10/225


12





By the King

Charles by the grace of God, King of ENGLAND, SCOTLAND, FRANCE and IRELAND, Defender of theFaith, &c.

To all our loving Subjects whom it shall or may concern, greeting. Whereas we are thus farre advanced inOur Royall Person with Our Armie, and the attendance of Our Nobilitie and Gentry of this Kingdome, andintend to be mostly at Our good town of Barwicke, with purpose to give Our good people of Scotland all justsatisfaction in Parliament, assoone as the present disorders, and tumultuous proceedings of some there arequieted; and will leave Us a fair way of comming like a gratious King to declare Our good meaning to them.But finding some cause of Impediment, and that this Nation doth apprehend (that contrarie to theirprofessions) there is an intention to invade this Our Kingdom of England. We doe therefore to cleare alldoubts, that may breed scruples in the mindes of Our good Subjects of either Kingdome, reiterate this Ourjust and reall Protestation: That if all civill and temporall obedience be effectually and timely given and shewnunto Us, we doe not intend to invade them with any hostility. But if they shall without Our special Authoritieand Command raise any armed Troups, and draw them downe within ten miles of Our Border of England weshall then interpret that as an Invasion of Our said Kingdome of England, and in that case doe expresslycommand the Generall of Our Army, and Our Superior Officers of the same, respectively to proceede againstthem as Rebells, and Invaders of this Kingdome of England, and to the utmost of their power to set uponthem and destroy them, In which they shall doe a singular service, both to our honour and safety.

Given at Our Court at Newcastle the fourteenth day of May, in the fifteenth yeer of Our reign.

God save the King.

Simplified transcriptAn announcement from Charles to the people of Scotland, May 1639

By the King

Charles, by the grace of God, King of England, Scotland, France and Ireland, Defender of the Faith etc

To all our loving subjects, greetings. We have advanced with our army and our nobles and gentry of thiskingdom. We intend to be mostly at Berwick, to give our good people of Scotland all justice in Parliament, assoon as the present disorderly actions of some there are quieted. We will come like a gracious King todeclare our good will to them. But we find there is a barrier. This nation knows (that contrary to their claims)there is an intention to invade England. So to clear all doubts, that may breed worries in your minds, werepeat our just and real demand. If all civil obedience is effectively and quickly given to us, we do not intendto invade with any hostility. But if they raise any armed troops without our authority, and bring them down towithin ten miles of the border of England, we shall then interpret that as an invasion of our kingdom. In thatcase, we command the general and senior officers of our army to proceed against them as rebels andinvaders of England, and to the utmost of their power to set upon them and destroy them. In this they shalldo a great service to both our honour and safety.

Given at our court at Newcastle, the 14th day of May, in the 15th year of our reign.

God save the King.

13


Document: SP 16/ 485/ 58


14


Transcript: SP 16/ 485/ 58


The Treasone being thus discovered did spread a pace through out the north of Ireland where the Rebellion

first began and in severall places in severall bodies are of the papists upp in armes, above 10 thowsand men

which doth much perplex the poorer protestants, and greate feare whether they shall bee able either to

suppresse or resist them. Whereupon our parlament hath addressed my Lord of Leicester Lord Lieutenant &

all other Comaunders here ever speedily to repare thither & doe furnish 50 thowsand pownds to carrie along

with them which the Cittie of London advances for providing of men & armes to secure that kingdome. Some

blood the villains have shedd & committed greate outrages; and taken some Castles and other places of

strength, but if they had taken Dublin, upon the rack divers have confessed in a shorte time they would not

have leefte a Protestant alive in the wholle kingdome but God in his Mercy hath prevaented that slaughter &

hath turned parte of it upon them selves. The Traytors give out the Late Tyranie of the Lord of Strafford upon

them moved them to it and that by the examples of the Scotts; they hoped to purchase such priviledges by

this meanes in their Religion, as otherwise they never expected to have graanted to them.

Simplified transcriptThe treason [rebellion], being discovered, spread quickly throughout the north of Ireland, where the rebellion

first began. In several places groups of the Catholics are up in arms, more than 10,000 men. This worries the

poorer Protestants, and there is great fear whether they shall be able either to stop or resist them. Our

Parliament directed my Lord of Leicester, Lord Lieutenant, and all other commanders here to quickly go

there. It provided ¦pound;50,000 to carry along with them, which the city of London advanced for providing

men and arms to secure that kingdom. The villains have shed some blood and committed great outrages and

taken some castles and other strongholds. But if they had taken Dublin, various people have confessed upon

the rack [under torture] that they would not have left a Protestant alive in the whole kingdom. But God in his

Mercy has prevented that slaughter and has turned part of it upon the rebels. The traitors said that the harsh

rule of Lord Strafford over them drove them to it and also the example set by the Scots [the Scottish

rebellion]. By this means they hoped to gain privileges in their religion, which otherwise they never expected

to have granted to them.

15



A document setting out the wishes of Parliament, December 1640

16


Transcript: SP 16/474/8A document setting out the wishes of Parliament, December 1640

1. whatsoever is declared by the 2 houses binds the starchamber the Lords of your Counncell andall other Courts of Justice.

2. that the king hath not power to lay an imposition upon forayne (much lesse home bred)commodityes though with consent of the merchants without Consent of Parliament.

3. that the clergy though by the Kings Consent and with his Confirmation can make no Constitutionor Canons to bind the clergy (much lesse the laity) without consent of Parliament. Ex consequentithe King alone can not doe it without such consent.

4. that of right we ought to have Parliaments one or twice a yeare.

5. that dissolving of Parliaments suddaynly without redressing the greivances Complayned of is agreat greivance.

Simplified transcript:1. Whatever the two Houses of Parliament agree binds the Star Chamber, the Lords of yourCouncil, and all other Courts of Justice.

2. The king does not have the power to tax foreign (or home made) goods, even with the consentof the merchants, without the consent of Parliament

3. The clergy, even with the king's consent, can make no laws or rules to bind the clergy (or theordinary people) without consent of Parliament. The king alone cannot do this without Parliament'sconsent.

4. Of right, we ought to have Parliaments one or twice a year.

5. Dissolving of Parliaments suddenly, without setting right the complaints, is a great cause ofcomplaint.

17



Charles’ I speech to parliament demanding the 5M.P’s but they have withdrawn, 4th January 1642.

18


Charles’ I speech to parliament demanding the 5 MPs, but they have withdrawn, 4th January 1642

N.B. Any words printed in italics, were crossed through in the original document

Gentlemen: I am sorry for this occasion of coming into you; yesterday I sent a sergeant at armesuppon a very important occasion, to apprehend some that by my Command, were accused of hightreason, where unto I did expect obedience and not a message.

And I must declare unto you here, that albeit noe King that ever was in England, shall bee moreCarefull of your previledges, to mentaine them to the uttermost of his power then I shall doe, yet youmust know yet in Cases of Treason noe person hath a previledge, And therefore I am come toknow, if any of those persons that were accused are here.

Then casting his Eyes uppon all the members in the House, said for I doe not see any of them Ithinke I should know them

I must tell you Gent. That soe long as these persons, that I have Accused (for noe slight crime, butfor Treason), are here, I Cannot expect that this House, can bee in the right way, that I doe heartiltywish it: Therefore I am come to tell you that I must have them, wheresoever I finde them

Then his Majie said is Mr Pyme here to wh noe Body gave answers well Since I see All the Birdsare flowen I doe expect from you that, you shall send them unto mee, as soone as they returnehither but I asseure must tell you in the word of a King: I never did intend any force, but shallproceed against (agt) them in a legall and faire way: for I never meant intended any other:

And now since I see I Cannot doe what I Came for. I thinke this noe unfit occasion to Repeat what Ihave said formerly that what soever I have done in favour and to the good of my subjects I doemeane to mentaine it.

I will trouble you noe more But tell you I doe expect as soone as they come to the House, you willsend them to mee otherwise I must take my owne Course to finde them.


19

Simplified transcript: SP 16/488/25

Charles’ I speech to parliament demanding the 5 MPs, but they have withdrawn, 4th January 1642

N.B. Any words printed in italics, were crossed through in the original document

[Extra explanations are in square brackets]

Gentlemen, I am sorry that I have had to come to you at the House of Commons. Yesterday I sent aSergeant at Arms [a man responsible for keeping law and order in the House] to arrest some MPswho were accused of high treason [a crime against the King or country]. I expected them to bebrought to me. I did not expect to receive a message.

As King, I know about your rights [Charles I is talking about the MPs’ parliamentary privileges, asthe King should not have come to the House of Commons to arrest the MPs]. But in cases oftreason, nobody has any privileges. I have come to see if any of the people accused of this crimeare here.

The King looked around at the members in the House, and said; I do not see any of those peopleaccused of high treason here.

I must tell you Gentlemen that this House will not be in order until I have these people. I will takethem wherever I find them.

Then his Majesty said; is Mr Pym here? Nobody answered.

I can see that all the birds have flown [Charles I is talking about the accused MPs not being presentin the House of Commons]. I expect you to send them to me as soon as they return. In the word ofa King, I assure you that I do not intend any force. I will try them in a legal and fair way.

I will repeat what I said, that whatever I have done for the good of my subjects, I do mean tomaintain it.

I will trouble you no more. I expect you to send these people to me as soon as they return to theHouse. Otherwise I will take my own actions to find them.


20



A committee considering the safety of the kingdom after the arrest of 5 members; it is a printed leaflet fromparliament, 12th Jan 1642

21




A committee considering the safety of the kingdom after the arrest of the five members; printedleaflet from Parliament, 12th January 1642

The Declaration agreed upon by the Committee of the House of Commons to sit in the Guildhall ofLondon, to consider of the safety of the Kingdom, and of the City of London. And of the preservingthe Priviledges of Parliament.

Master Wilde Serjeant at Law, sitting in the Chaire of that Committee. 6. Jan. 1641.

Whereas the Chambers Studies, and Truncks of M. Hollis, Sir Arthur Haslerige, M. Pym, M.Hampden, and M. Strode, Members of the House of Commons, upon Munday the 3. of this instantJanuary, by colour of His Majesties Warrant have been sealed up by Sir William Kilegrey, and SirWilliam Flemen and others; which is no only against the Priviledge of Parliament, but the commonLiberty of every Subject: Which said members afterwards, the same day were under the like colour,by Serjeant Frances, one of His Majesties Serjeants at Arms, contrary to all former Presidents andPriviledges of Parliaments demanded of the Speaker, sitting in the House of Commons to bedelivered unto him, that he might Arrest them of High Treason: And whereas afterwards the next dayHis Majesty in His Royall Person came to the said House attended with a great multitude of menarmed in a warlike manner, with Halberts, Swords, and Pistolls, who came up to the very door of thehouse, and placed themselves there, and in other places and passages neer to the said house, tothe great terrour and disturbance of the Members thereof, then sitting, according to their dutie, in apeaceable and orderly manner, treating of the great Affairs of England and Ireland: And his Majestyhaving placed himself in the Speakers Chair, demanded of them the persons of the said Members tobe delivered unto him, which is a high Breach of the rights and Priviledges of Parliament, andinconsistent with the Liberties and Freedom thereof. And whereas afterwards his Majesty did issueforth severall Warrants and Officers, under his own hand, for the apprehension of the Persons of thesaid Members, which by Law he cannot do, there being not all this time, any Legall charge orAccusation, or due Processes of Law issued against them, nor any pretence of charge made knownto that house; all which are against the Fundamentall Liberties of the Subject, and the Rights ofParliament. Whereupon we are necessitated, according to our duty, to declare, That if any personshall arrest M. Hollis, Sir Arthur Haslerige, M. Pym, M. Hampden, and M. Strode, or any of them, orany other Member of Parliament, by pretence or colour of any Warrant issuing from the King only, isguilty of the Breach of Liberties of the Subject, and of the Priviledge of Parliament, and a publikeenemy to the Commonwealth. And that the Arresting of the said Members, or any of them, or of anyother Member of Parliament, by any Warrant whatsoever, without a Legall proceeding against them,and without consent of that house, whereof such Person is a Member, is against the Liberty of theSubject, and a Breach of Priviledge of Parliament; And the Person which shall Arrest any of thesePerson, or any other Member of the Parliament, is declared a publike enemy of the Common-wealth.

Notwithstanding all which we think fit further to declare, that we are so farre from any endeavour toprotect any of our Members, that shall be in due manner prosecuted according to the Laws of theKingdom, and the Rights and Priviledges of Parliament for Treason, or any other misdemeanour,That none shall be more ready and willing then we our selves, to bring them to their speedy, anddue tryall, Being sensible that it equally imports us, as well to see Justice done against them thatare criminous, as to defend the just Rights and Liberties of the Subjects, and Parliament of England.

London, Printed for Joseph Hunscott, 1642

22

Simplified transcript: SP 16/488/52


[Extra explanations are in square brackets.]

The Declaration agreed by the Committee of the House of Commons, in the Guildhall of London, toconsider the safety of the Kingdom and of the City of London. And to protect the Privileges ofParliament [particular rights given to MPs sitting in Parliament].

The committee meets here on the 3rd January, because of the King’s Warrant [an order to arrest thefive MPs involved in the Grand Remonstrance]. This is not only against the Privileges of Parliament,but also against the common freedom of every subject. Sergeant Frances, one of the King’sSergeants at Arms, demanded of the Speaker sitting in the Houses of Commons [Chief Officer ofthe House who makes sure that the rules are followed], that the five MPs should be delivered to himso he could arrest them for High Treason. This is against all of the Privileges of Parliament. Thenext day, the King came to the House of Commons along with many armed men carrying halberts [aweapon with an axe-like blade and steel spike], swords and pistols [small guns]. Some came up tothe door of the House of Commons, whilst others stood in the corridors near to the House. Thiscaused great terror and disturbance for the MPs in the House, who were all carrying out their dutiesin a quiet and peaceful way. The King sat in the Speaker’s chair, and demanded that the five MPsbe brought to him. This is against the rights and privileges of Parliament. Afterwards the King sentseveral warrants signed by him for the arrest of the five members. Again, he cannot do this, as noproper charge has been brought against them. We declare that if anyone tries to arrest M. Hollis, AirArthur Haslerige, M. Pym, M, Hampden, M. Strode or any other MP with a warrant from the King, isguilty of a breach of liberties [freedom] and of the privileges of Parliament, and is a public enemy ofthe commonwealth.

We are not trying to protect any MPs that should be prosecuted for Treason or any other crime, inaccordance with to the laws of our kingdom. We want to see justice done against those that arecriminals, in order to defend the rights and freedom of the subjects, and of the Parliament ofEngland.

London, Printed for Joseph Hunscott, 1642


23


Team: (Royalist/Puritan) Point of Debate: (taxes, religion etc)

I also argue or want to question ... (during the videoconference write down any otherarguments or questions you may have)

Worksheet: The English Civil Wars: whose side are you on?

• Complete the boxes below for your role in the debate!

• During the debate, you will be asked to read out your argument for your team.

• Remember to read out all you have written from boxes 1 and 2 and to speak with

confidence!

You can use the documents, your schoolbooks, or other sources to support your argument.

My argument: (BOX 1)As a (Royalist/Puritan) I argue that …

(BOX 2)To support my argument I have chosen … (name the document(s), book, source etc thatyou have chosen to support your argument)

It supports my argument because …(give a few details about your document etc and a quoteto explain how it supports your argument)

Education Service Workshops Key Stage 3 The English Civil · PDF fileLearning Curve Education...

Documents

Transcript of Education Service Workshops Key Stage 3 The English Civil · PDF fileLearning Curve Education...