EDLD 8431 Case Review

3
Simpson 1 Nikki Simpson Case Review EDLD 8431 Fall 2014 Waliga v. Board of Trustees of Kent State University As stated in summation of Crook v. Baker (1987), the facts of Waliga v. Board of Trustees of Kent State University (1986) are that Kent State University received information regarding discrepancies in academic records and determined that two students did not complete the requirements for their degrees and were notified that the university was considering revoking the degrees. According to The Bryan Times (1983), grades were changed for three Kent State University students, George Waliga, Kent Taylor, and Stephen Hughes, in the 1960s. Hughes attempted to blackmail Waliga by threatening to reveal the changing of seventy grades for the three men. With the cooperation of Waliga, Hughes was arrested. During this incident the altered grade issue was revealed and the Board of Trustees of Kent State University decided to hold a hearing to discuss the matter and decide if the degrees should be revoked (The Bryan Times, 1983). The issue raised in Waliga v. Board of Trustees of Kent State University is whether a university has the authority to revoke degrees that were improperly awarded. The court found that a board of trustees does have the authority to revoke degrees when there is proper cause and there is a fair hearing procedure. The court noted that academic degrees are a statement that the recipient has met the institution’s standards and has fulfilled all requirements for graduation. If institutions of higher education do not have a course of action to revoke a degree, the university is in essence certifying that a person has fulfilled requirements when they have not. If this type

description

EDLD 8431 Case Review

Transcript of EDLD 8431 Case Review

  • Simpson 1

    Nikki Simpson Case Review EDLD 8431 Fall 2014

    Waliga v. Board of Trustees of Kent State University

    As stated in summation of Crook v. Baker (1987), the facts of Waliga v. Board of

    Trustees of Kent State University (1986) are that Kent State University received

    information regarding discrepancies in academic records and determined that two

    students did not complete the requirements for their degrees and were notified that the

    university was considering revoking the degrees. According to The Bryan Times (1983),

    grades were changed for three Kent State University students, George Waliga, Kent

    Taylor, and Stephen Hughes, in the 1960s. Hughes attempted to blackmail Waliga by

    threatening to reveal the changing of seventy grades for the three men. With the

    cooperation of Waliga, Hughes was arrested. During this incident the altered grade issue

    was revealed and the Board of Trustees of Kent State University decided to hold a

    hearing to discuss the matter and decide if the degrees should be revoked (The Bryan

    Times, 1983).

    The issue raised in Waliga v. Board of Trustees of Kent State University is

    whether a university has the authority to revoke degrees that were improperly awarded.

    The court found that a board of trustees does have the authority to revoke degrees when

    there is proper cause and there is a fair hearing procedure.

    The court noted that academic degrees are a statement that the recipient has met

    the institutions standards and has fulfilled all requirements for graduation. If institutions

    of higher education do not have a course of action to revoke a degree, the university is in

    essence certifying that a person has fulfilled requirements when they have not. If this type

  • Simpson 2

    of occurrence happened frequently it would lead to a breakdown in the integrity of

    degrees. If a degree is awarded in error or it is found that the recipient received the degree

    through an act of fraud that universities have an implied authority to revoke it based on

    R.C. 3341.04, which states that universities shall do all things necessary for the proper

    maintenance and successful and continuous operation of such universities. The opinion

    in Waliga v. Board of Trustees of Kent State University (1986) stated, The power to

    confer degrees necessarily implies the power to revoke degrees erroneously granted.

    The court also noted an earlier ruling in The King v. University of Cambridge

    (1334) in which it was decided that a man has a right to a hearing before being deprived

    of property. Cleveland Board of Education v. Loudermill (1985) found that a degree

    holder does have a right to his degree and without adequate procedures that right

    cannot be withdrawn.

    The case notes in Waliga v. Board of Trustees of Kent State University noted that

    the appellees in the case were informed in writing of Kent State Universitys plan to

    commence degree revocation procedures, were given time to review the evidence the

    university would introduce at the hearing, were given notice of the hearing, and had

    opportunity to present evidence and address witnesses.

    The case notes made it clear that Kent State University had a procedure of due

    process in place and it was adequately used in this case. The general rule from this case is

    that universities do have authority to revoke academic degrees provided due process is

    followed. The decision made in Waliga v. Board of Trustees of Kent State University

    reversed the decision made at the court of appeals and all judges concurred with the

    opinion.

  • Simpson 3

    References

    Cleveland Board of Education v. Loudermill, 470 U.S. 532 (1985).

    Crook III v. Baker, 813 F. 2d 88 (1987).

    Former attorney faces sentence. (1983, January 20). The Bryan Times, 11. Retrieved from

    http://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=799&dat=19830120&id=DZhjAAAAIB

    AJ&sjid=QVIDAAAAIBAJ&pg=6534,1951207

    R.C. 3341.04

    The King v. University of Cambridge (Bentley's Case) (K.B. 1723), 8 Modern Rep.

    (Select Cases) 148, 92 E.R. 818, 2 Ld. Raym. (1334).

    Waliga V. Board of Trustees of Kent State University, 22 Ohio St. 3d 55, 488 NE2d 850

    (1986).