ECUADOR LOCAL BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT …pdf.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/pdacu747.pdf · PRODEL Ecuador Local...
Transcript of ECUADOR LOCAL BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT …pdf.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/pdacu747.pdf · PRODEL Ecuador Local...
DISCLAIMER
The authors views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Agency for
International Development or the United States Government.
ECUADOR LOCAL BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT
PROGRAM (PRODEL) Cooperative Agreement #518-A-00-08-00002-00
Fiscal Year 2010 1st Quarter Progress Report
January 31, 2010
Submitted by: Submitted to: Sarah Mattingly, Hugo Ramos, USAID/Ecuador FIELD-Support LWA, AED Steve Beard, Program Manager, ACDI/VOCA
ACRONYM LIST AACRI Río Intag Small Coffee Producer’s Association
AAPPSME Agro-artisan Association of Producers of Dry Medicinal Plants of Ecuador
AED Academy for Educational Development
ANECAFÉ National Association of Coffee Exporters
APECAEL Specialty Coffee Association of Loja
APECAM Specialty Coffee Association of Small Growers of Marcabeli-Balsas
APECAP Association of Ecological Producers of Palanda - Chinchipe
APEOSAE Organic Farming Exporter’s Association
APEOSAE Small Organic Farming Exporter’s Association
APROCA Atacames Cacao Producers Association
APROCAM Association of Cocoa Producers of Muisne
APROCASH Shushufindi Cacao Producers Association
ASOGUABO Association of Small Banana Producers of Guabo
BCS Bio Control Systems
BCS ÖKO Bio Control Systems Garantie
C&D Conservation & Development
CABP Certification of Agricultural Best Practices
CAF Andean Development Corporation
CEDEIN Indigenous Development Center
CFN National Financial Corporation
CONFITECA Ecuadorian Candy Company
CORPEI The Ecuadorian Export and Investments Corporation
DCA Development Credit Authority
ECOCACAO Cacao Small Producer’s Association of Esmeraldas
ECOLAC The Technical University of Loja Dairy Factory
El SALINERITO The Salinas Salesian Family Foundation
EPF Enterprise Partnership Fund
ESCOFFEE Specialty Coffees of Ecuador
ETIMOS Organization of Finance and Credit
EUROAGRO The International Agricultural Production Fair
FEDECADE National Federation of Cacao Growers of Ecuador
FIELD-Support Financial Integration, Economic Leveraging, Broad Based Dissemination and Support
FISPDICA Foundation of Social Initiative for the Development of the Atacames Canton
FLO Fairtrade Labelling Organizations International
FODEMI Microenterprise Development Fund
FONCAFE National Coffee Fund
FY Fiscal Year
GOE Government of Ecuador
GRUPPO SALINAS Salinas Salesian Family Foundation
HOJA VERDE Trading Company Of Flowers And Cholcolate In Ecuador
ICAM Italian Chocolate Company
ICS Internal Control Systems
INAEXPO Agricultural Export Industry
INAGROFA Freund Arroyo Industrial Agriculture Company
INCOP National Institute of Public Purchases in Ecuador
INIAP Ecuadorian Institute for Agricultural Production
IPM Integrated Pest Management
IRS Internal Revenue Service
ISO Quality Management System
JUGO FACIL Leenrike Frozen Food
KALLARI Chocolate Company in Ecuador
LWA Leader with Associates
MAGAP Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock & Fisheries
MCPEC The Ministry for Coordination of the Production, Employment, and Competitiveness
M&R Monitoring and Evaluation
ME&R Monitoring, Evaluation and Reporting System
MIPRO Ecuadorian Ministry of Production
NAAT-E Association of Social Participation Nucleo Self of Technical Assistance of Esmeraldas
PESTELI “Market Analysis”, Political, Economic, Social, technologic ecological, legislative, and industry
PFI Potential for Inclusion
PROCAP High Altitude Coffee Growers Association of Puyango
PRODEL Ecuador Local Business Development Program
PRONACA National Food Processing - Ecuador
RA Rainforest Alliance
RAS Sustainable Agriculture Standard
RFN Rural Financial Network
RTC Cooperative Transactional Network
SALINERO Cacao Producer Company – Salinas Group
SCAA The Specialty Coffee Association of America
SME Small and Medium Enterprises
SNV Netherlands Development Organization
TRIARI S.A. The Coffee and Cocoa Industry Company
UNOCACE Union of Cacao Farmer Organizations of Ecuador
UROCAL Coastal Region Union of Farmer Organizations
USAID United States Agency for International Development
WOCCU World Council of Credit Unions
TABLE OF CONTENTS PROGRAM OVERVIEW ................................................................................................................................................................. 6
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................................................................. 8
1. PROMOTE ANCHOR FIRM AND VALUE CHAIN COMPETITIVENESS ..................................................................................... 9
2. STRENGTHEN VERTICAL AND HORIZONTAL LINKAGES ..................................... ERROR! BOOKMARK NOT DEFINED.1
3. FOSTER THE PROVISION OF FINANCIAL SERVICES ............................................................................................................ 27
4. EXPAND AND TRANSFER THE VALUE CHAIN MODEL ........................................................................................................ 32
5. PULLING IN LOCAL SERVICE PROVIDERS ........................................................................................................................... 33
6. MONITORING AND EVALUATION ...................................................................................................................................... 34
7. SUBCONTRACTS AND GRANTS .......................................................................................................................................... 36
8. CERTIFICATION OF AGRICULTURAL BEST PRACTICES (CABP) ............................................................................................ 37
9. MANAGEMENT .................................................................................................................................................................. 44
ANNEX 1 – LESSONS LEARNED AND GUIDELINES FOR FUTURE ACTIVITIES FROM PRODEL PHASE I, FY 2009 .......................... 45
ANNEX 2 – PRODEL FY 2009 ACHIEVEMENTS TO DECEMBER 31, 2009 ..................................................................................... 48
ANNEX 3 – ANCHOR FIRM EVALUATION MATRIX ...................................................................................................................... 49
ANNEX 4 – ANCHOR FIRM SELECTION SCORES FOR PHASE I FIRMS .......................................................................................... 52
ANNEX 5 – SUBSECTOR EVALUATION MATRIX ......................................................................................................................... 53
ANNEX 6 - PRODEL I ANCHOR FIRM EVALUATION MATRIX SUMMARIES ................................................................................. 54
ANNEX 7 - NEW ANCHOR FIRM EVALUATION MATRIX .................................................................................................... 63
ANNEX 8 - ANALYSIS OF PROJECT EXPENSES BY GEOGRAPHICAL AREA .................................................................................... 66
LIST OF TABLES Table 1: PRODEL Program Indicators .........................................................................................................................7
Table 2: Selection of New Anchor Firms.................................................................................................................. 12
Table 3: Value Chain Competitiveness Strengthening Activities During the 1st Quarter of FY 2010 ..................... 16
Table 4: Strengthening Activities and Results for Value Chain Veritical & Horizontal Linkages ............................. 23
Table 5: PRODEL II Key Indicator Achievements ..................................................................................................... 35
Table 6: Certification Activities for Anchor Firms in the First Quarter of FY 2010 .................................................. 39
Table 7: CABP Key Progress Indicators and Targets ................................................................................................ 42
Table 8: Achievements to December 31, 2009 for PRODEL 1 Indicators ................................................................ 48
LIST OF GRAPHS
Graph 1: Anchor Firm and Subsector Positioning Graph ........................................................................................ 11
Graph 2: PRODEL Strategic Orientation Approach ……………………………………………………………………………………………. 21
Graph 3: PRODEL Strategic Orientation Tool ……………………………………………………………………………………………………. 22
Graph 4: Total loan amount percentage by source of financing………………………………………………………………………. 28
Graph 5: Percentage of the loan amount by financial institution……………………………………………………………………… 29
PRODEL QUARTERLY REPORT – October 1, 2009 through December 31, 2009 6
PROGRAM OVERVIEW PRODEL, an associate award under USAID’s FIELD-Support Leader with Associates (LWA),
aims to increase income and employment for families along the northern and southern
border areas of Ecuador by supporting the expansion of private enterprises that will rapidly
generate income and employment, and by strengthening local private producer groups and
associations. Managed by the Academy for Educational Development (AED) and
implemented by ACDI/VOCA in the field, PRODEL provides demand-driven assistance
packages (technical assistance, targeted training and small grants) to stimulate and facilitate
increased investments in strategically-selected agribusiness and non-agricultural anchor
firms and their networks of suppliers and ancillary firms with a commitment to the growth
of their businesses and the potential to generate significant increases in income and
employment.
In support of the above objectives, PRODEL has created the Enterprise Partnership Fund to
provide technical and co-financing assistance to lead or “anchor” firms, tailored to their
specific needs. The assistance packages include a combination of market development,
financing, accounting, management assistance and skills training depending on the specific
challenges facing each anchor firm. PRODEL collaborates with banks, finance companies and
microfinance institutions to facilitate the provision of additional credit to participating
anchor firms and producer groups.
AED and ACDI/VOCA received a modification to the level of effort for PRODEL in September
2009 extending the program to September 30, 2012 and increasing the number of
participating anchor firms by 34 firms.
The second phase of PRODEL is implemented through five key areas:
Promote Anchor Firm and Value Chain Competitiveness
Upgrading Vertical and Horizontal Linkages
Foster the Provision of Financial Services
Expand and Transfer the Value Chain Model
Pulling in Local Service Providers
PRODEL QUARTERLY REPORT – October 1, 2009 through December 31, 2009 7
In the new phase of the program, PRODEL will monitor its progress against the following
targets.
Table 1: PRODEL Program Indicators
INDICATOR Fiscal Year 2010
Fiscal Year 2011
Fiscal Year 2012
Life of Project
Number of urban and rural anchor firms 10 12 12 34
Number of beneficiary families 4,000 4,800 4,800 13,600
Number of hectares of new and improved licit crops 2,800 3,400 3,400 9,600
Number of full time employees 2,000 2,400 2,400 6,800
Increase in family (household) income 25% 25% 25% 75%
Increase in sales of producer groups to the anchor firm 25% 25% 25% 75%
Number of technicians trained from NGOs and the GOE 80 100 120 300
PRODEL QUARTERLY REPORT – October 1, 2009 through December 31, 2009 8
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report covers activities undertaken and results achieved during the first quarter of the
Fiscal Year (FY) 2010 (October 1–December 31, 2009). The indicators for PRODEL goals and
objectives are being reported on a cumulative annual basis. PRODEL’s main achievements
during this quarter include the following:
The first phase of PRODEL ended September 30, 2009 and the team met or exceeded
all but the anchor firm sales target that will be reported as of the end of the 2nd
quarter of FY 2010.
The Certification of Agricultural Best Practices component of PRODEL was completed
as of December 31, 2009 and met or exceeded all of its established targets.
To close out the first phase of the program, the PRODEL team hosted an event in the
Quito Marriott to disseminate achievements. Attended by an estimated total of 280
public and private sector representatives, the event featured stands from the 20 first
phase anchor firms and testimonials from five of the program beneficiaries. The
event attracted media coverage and the PRODEL team distributed a book entitled
“Supporting Efforts and Harvesting Development” to attendees. A video highlighting
PRODEL’s work during the course of the past 20 months was presented and
attendees were invited to hors d’oeuvres made with ingredients from the six product
sectors chosen for the first phase of the program.
The second phase of PRODEL began during this past quarter and the current
program contract runs through September 30, 2012.
The PRODEL team conducted Rapid Value Chain Assessments of PRODEL I sub-
sectors to include, coffee, cacao, dairy products, medicinal plants and aromatic
herbs, processed fruits, and grains. The assessment suggested that the coffee,
cacao, processed fruits, and grains subsectors should be retained for the second
phase of the program.
The PRODEL team profiled anchor firms considered for participation in the second
phase of the program. Ten firms were presented to USAID: three in cacao, three in
coffee, two in fruits, one in grains, and one in fish & seafood.
AED in coordination with the PRODEL team in Ecuador conducted Rapid End Market
Assessments of PRODEL I sub-sectors to include, coffee, cacao, dairy products,
medicinal plants and aromatic herbs, processed fruits and grains to USAID.
PRODEL QUARTERLY REPORT – October 1, 2009 through December 31, 2009 9
1. PROMOTE ANCHOR FIRM AND VALUE
CHAIN COMPETITIVENESS
The prodel team launched a new phase of the program this past quarter and within the promotion of the anchor firm value chain competitiveness component began by selecting subsectors and anchor firms. This component describes the activities to maximize the potential for marketing opportunities for PRODEL anchor firms and their linked producers.
1.1 Achievements during the Quarter
During the 1st quarter of FY 2010, the PRODEL team developed new and improved
quantitative measurement tools to improve the process for the selection of subsectors and
anchor firms for the second phase of the program. These tools will not only serve the
program by providing quantitative measurements and parameters for comparison in the
process to select potential subsectors and anchor firms on behalf of the the PRODEL team,
but they will also be useful for regularly measuring PRODEL and anchor firm program
progress.
The goal for the number of anchor firms and their producer groups for the second phase of
PRODEL is 34 for the period ending September 30, 2012. The goal for this past quarter was
to select a minimum of 10 anchor firms as of December 31, 2009 to begin program
implementation.
A. Anchor Firm Selection
To select anchor firms for participation in the program, the team uses an evaluation matrix
that measures the level of market development, the firm’s management capacity, the
degree of small-scale producer inclusiveness, and access to support services. The score
obtained through the matrix is used in conjunction with other tools developed for PRODEL
that include positioning and strategic orientation tools to select the anchor firms for the
program. Using this matrix, the PRODEL team evaluated each of the PRODEL I firms in an
effort to assess their status after their participation in Phase I of PRODEL.
In phase II the PRODEL team agreed to move forward in its partnership with five of the
PRODEL I anchor firms. To identify these, the team undertook a thorough assessment of
these firms in terms of their: (1) achievement of results under PRODEL I; (2) capacity and
leadership to expand outreach to new producer and value chain groups; (3) The anchor firm
business growth capacity; (4) Market development capacity. The latest version of the
anchor firm evaluation matrix is found in Annex 3. As a result of higher qualification scores
through the evaluation matrix and other factors taken into account described in table 2, the
following anchor firms from the first phase of the program were selected for participation in
PRODEL QUARTERLY REPORT – October 1, 2009 through December 31, 2009 10
the second phase of PRODEL: FAPECAFES, Jugo Facil, Gruppo Salinas, Cereales Andinos and
COFINA (see Annex 6).
The matrix was also used to evaluate potential new anchor firms, five of which have been
pre-selected and are as follows: Cafecom, San Carlos, Deprodemar, Tropicano, and Café
Minerva (see Annex 7).
The firms were ranked in the following positioning graph that forms the basis for selecting
the five anchor firms from Phase I of PRODEL for inclusion in the second phase.
PRODEL QUARTERLY REPORT – October 1, 2009 through December 31, 2009 11
ESCOFFEE
GRUPPO SALINAS
FAPECAFESASOGUABOCAFÉ VÉLEZ
SKS
MONDEL
APROCA
COFINA
AACRI
ECOLAC
AAPROCASH
C ANDINOSINAGROFA
AROMA AMAZÓNICO
AAPPSME
JUGO FÁCILGALLETTI
1.50
2.50
3.50
1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00
Sub
sect
or
Eva
lua
tio
n
Anchor Firm Evaluation
Anchor Firm and Subsector Evaluation
ESCOFFEE GRUPPO SALINAS FAPECAFES ASOGUABO CAFÉ VÉLEZ SKS MONDEL
APROCA COFINA AACRI ECOLAC AAPROCASH CEREALES ANDINOS INAGROFA
AROMA AMAZÓNICO SOL DE ORIENTE AAPPSME JUGO FÁCIL GALLETTI
Reject even with high PFI
Consider anchor firms >1.5 and higher PFI Select anchor firms according to PFI
Consider anchor firms >1.5 and higher PFI
I
III IV
II
Graph 1: Anchor Firm and Subsector Positioning Graph
PRODEL QUARTERLY REPORT – October 1, 2009 through December 31, 2009
12
From this graph 1, the following PRODEL I firms, located in quadrant I, displayed the
greatest Potential for Inclusion (PFI) and therefore were selected for the second phase of
the program: Gruppo Salinas, FAPECAFES, Jugo Fácil, COFINA, and Cereales Andinos.
Positioning in the graph determines the priorities for selection, for example, a firm with a
high PFI within quadrant II could be considered as a potential anchor firm. This is not the
case with firms in quadrants III and IV, due to the fact that they belong to subsectors with
less competitive potential. The five firms selected for phase II occur in quadrant I of the
graph where both the anchor firm and subsector interaction is optimal. This quadrant
indicates high levels of competitiveness on behalf of the selected anchor firms and points to
a greater potential for PRODEL project intervention sustainability.
The PRODEL team has identified groups of producers and potential anchor firms within the
subsectors found to have the most potential for the program to include increased
competitiveness and potential to support large numbers of producers. The table below lists
the firms and producer groups identified so far that are currently undergoing the evaluation
and selection process. These firms and producer groups are located within the targeted
northern and southern border regions of Ecuador as well as falling into the subsector
categories selected for the second phase of PRODEL.
Table 2: Selection of New Anchor Firms
ZONE FIRM SUBSECTOR
Amazon San Carlos
Cacao
Amazon Caoni Cacao
Amazon República Del Cacao Cacao
Amazon HOJA VERDE Cacao
Amazon CONFITECA Cacao
Amazon KALLARI Cacao
Amazon Cocoamarket Cacao
Amazon Asociación Fortaleza del Valle Cacao
Amazon National Federation of Cacao Growers of Ecuador - FEDECADE Cacao
Amazon OSELLA S.A. Cacao
Amazon Triairi S.A. Cacao
Amazon Union of Cacao Farmer Organizations of Ecuador "UNOCACE" Cacao
Northern Phytotech Plant material
Northern LA VERDE Grains
Northern GRAMOLINO Grains
PRODEL QUARTERLY REPORT – October 1, 2009 through December 31, 2009
13
Northern RANDIMPACK Grains
Northern SUMAKLIFE Grains
Northern COPROVICH/ERPE Grains
Northern INAEXPO Processed vegetables
Northern IncaFood S.A Grains
Northern Indigenous Development Center CEDEIN Processed vegetables
Northern Expoarom Cia. Ltda. Processed vegetables
Northern Jambi Kiwa Processed vegetables
Northern Cultivos Orgánicos del Ecuador S.A. Processed vegetables
Northern Euroagro S.A. Processed vegetables
Northern Grupo Agromilenio, Equibusiness Cía Ltda. Processed vegetables
Northern FEPP CAMARI Grains
Southern CAFECOM Coffee
Southern CAFÉ MINERVA Coffee
Southern FINO DE AROMA Coffee Cacao
Southern EL CAFE Coffee
Southern GARDELA Coffee
Southern ORGANIC COFFEE Coffee
Southern BONCAFE Coffee
Southern FRYDECO Cacao
Southern FEDECADE Cacao
Southern UROCAL Cacao
Southern PRONACA Grains
Southern WAYNE Grains
Southern KAVE CAFÉ ECUATORIANA S.A. Coffee
Southern Indigenous Development Center CEDEIN. Coffee
Southern Frutos Del Pacífico Sur S.A. Processed fruits
Southern FRUTPASOUTH S.A. Processed fruits
Southern CORPAP Grains
Southern FEPROCAZH Cacao
Esmeraldas DEPRODEMAR Fish & seafood
Esmeraldas TROPICANO Processed fruits
Esmeraldas CHOCONO Cacao
Esmeraldas ECUACOCOA Cacao
Esmeraldas TULICORP Cacao
Esmeraldas CHOCOLATECA Cacao
Esmeraldas FFMD Cacao
Esmeraldas PALFRUIT Processed fruits
Esmeraldas EMPCOPAC/UNIVERSAL SEA FOOD Fish & seafood
Esmeraldas Naturalmente Rico Frozen Tropic Processed fruits
Esmeraldas Facundo Processed fruits
Esmeraldas Profruit Processed fruits
PRODEL QUARTERLY REPORT – October 1, 2009 through December 31, 2009
14
Esmeraldas AGROFACILE Processed fruits
Esmeraldas Guayas Processed fruits
Esmeraldas Sunny Processed fruits
Esmeraldas Exporganic S.A. Processed fruits
Esmeraldas FLP Latinoamerican Perishables del Ecuador S.A. Processed fruits
Esmeraldas Agricola Oficial Agroficial S.A. Processed fruits
Esmeraldas Amerifoods S.A. Processed fruits
Esmeraldas Compañía Agrícola Industrial Ecuaplantation S.A. Processed fruits
Esmeraldas Romero Kotre Agrícola Ganadera Processed fruits
Esmeraldas UROCAL - Regional Union of Farmer Organizations of the Coast Cacao
Esmeraldas Solipesca Fish and seafood
Esmeraldas INPROMAR Fish and seafood
B. Anchor Firm Business Planning
To increase the relevance of business planning activities for the anchor firms and ensure
appropriateness for the firms’ varying levels of sophistication, the PRODEL team worked to
improve and adapt its planning and analysis initiatives during this past quarter. The PRODEL
business planning process serves to identify the various critical success factors to achieve
sustainable competitive advantages for participating anchor firms and producer groups.
The methodology used includes workshops conducted with anchor firm and producer
stakeholders during which potential program capacity interventions are determined.
Limitations to greater value chain competitiveness are identified through a participatory
process during these workshops. In addition, ways to improve market demand through
increased raw material quality and quantity levels are considered in the discussion. From
the limitations and opportunities analyzed, activities are defined to be included in an
investment plan that forms the basis for the Enterprise Partnership Fund for each
participating value chain. Software has been developed to facilitate the sustainability of the
business planning process.
C. Subsector Evaluations
Based on the strategic subsectors defined by the Ecuadorian Ministry for the Coordination
of Productivity, Employment and Competitiveness (MCPEC) and the competitiveness of
each potential subsector within the provinces located in the PRODEL area of influence, the
PRODEL QUARTERLY REPORT – October 1, 2009 through December 31, 2009
15
PRODEL team developed a methodology that evaluates subsector competitive potential
with the goal of focusing program resources on enhancing the competitiveness of those
products that demonstrate the greatest potential for achieving PRODEL objectives. The
PRODEL technical team assessed the subsectors targeted in Phase I. In addition, a team of
consultants conducted assessments of potential new subsectors: processed vegetables, bio-
fuels, tourism, handicrafts, pork meat production, fish & seafood, agro-forestry products,
and processed fruits. Conclusions drawn from the assessments of the existing PRODEL
phase I subsectors suggest cacao, coffee, processed fruits and grains should be included in
Phase II. New subsector assessments are to be completed by next quarter.
The methodology used for PRODEL subsector evaluation included the following elements:
Primary and secondary information gathering
End market analysis
Quantitative subsector evaluation (subsector evaluation matrix)
Value chain analysis
Conclusions and recommendations
To support the new subsector evaluation and analysis process, ACDI/VOCA value chain
specialist Hannah Schiff traveled to Ecuador to provide guidance to the assessment team on
the value chain data collection and analysis.
The PRODEL team developed the subsector evaluation matrix and provided guidance to the
consultants on its use to ensure an accurate evaluation of subsector competitiveness. The
subsector evaluation matrix covers items related to the program context, the competitive
environment, and potential impact for small producers targeted by PRODEL. It includes a
PESTELI market analysis, that takes political, economic, social, technological, ecological,
legislative, and industry factors into consideration. A portion of the supporting information
used to assess these criteria was extracted from secondary sources, and additional primary
information was collected through surveys and focus groups conducted by the consultants
and PRODEL technical personnel directly with the targeted producers representing each
subsector. The latest version of the subsector evaluation matrix is presented in Annex 5.
PRODEL QUARTERLY REPORT – October 1, 2009 through December 31, 2009
16
Below is a summary of PRODEL I anchor firm and producer group activities during the
period from October-December 2009.
Table 3: Value Chain Competitivesness Strengthening Activities during the Quarter
COMPANY
STRENGTHENING ACTIVITIES AND RESULTS
Café Galletti - Café Galletti delivered 20,000 coffee bags to El Colmenar organization for sale under the El Colmenar label creating a stronger relationship between the anchor firm its producers - BCS organically certified 92 members of the El Colmenar group through the PRODEL CABP project
Mondel - Mondel redefined its business focus to concentrate on those products that provide greater profit margins and possess a greater level of acceptance in the marketplace. They also eliminated the catering component of their business due to comparatively low profit yields - Mondel redesigned the product portfolio according to product margin contributions - Mondel established new credit and collection policies that have reduced the period for accounts receivable from 135 to 90 days - Defined a company quality policy as part of the ISO 9001-2008 Quality Management System - Mondel implemented a modified incentive program to motivate sales department personnel. - Obtained a US$63,000 loan from CFN for the purchase of a delivery truck - Closed the catering business unit in order to improve efficiency - Conducted publicity and product tasting campaigns - Conducted food handling training for plant staff
Gruppo Salinas - Gruppo Salinas sold 149.5 MT of domestic organic and FLO cacao, for a total of US$471,614 - Due to negotiations with ICAM (Italy) that resulted from the PRODEL supported business tour, the firm met and surpassed sales projections - Gruppo Salinas began to pay back the loan from ETIMOS. By 2010, the company will have paid the capital plus interest that served as working capital to fulfill the agreement with ICAM - Currently negotiating with customers in Chile and the U.S. to sell chocolate and cocoa paste
AACRI Rio Intag - AACRI Rio Intag began implementing the market study for the 2009-2012 period
Cereales Andinos - Cereles Andinos earned contracts for government food programs - Participated in small producer inclusive fairs organized by INCOP
Aroma Amazónico - Aroma Amazónico hired Ricardo Cordero as manager. Mr. Cordero completed the PRODEL sponsored course at the Monterrey Institute
PRODEL QUARTERLY REPORT – October 1, 2009 through December 31, 2009
17
COMPANY
STRENGTHENING ACTIVITIES AND RESULTS
of Technology
COFINA - COFINA progressed with the construction of the semi-processed cacao product plant
AAPROCASH - AAPROCASH sold CCN-51 cacao to Rainforest Alliance customers that had been separated from the National Arriba cacao variety. This is an example of best cacao post-harvest practices
AAPPSME - AAPPSME introduced sales wagons to promote products - Conducted an Horchata Lojana advertising campaign - Obtained a health certificate for the horchata (herbs) with honey product
ESCOFFEE - ESCOFFEE achieved organic certification with the Control Union Company - Initiated contacts necessary for Fair Trade Certification - ESCOFFEE is currently negotiating a loan from CORPEI for US$1 million to build and equip its Coffee Research Center which will support product development, quality assurance, and commercialization efforts
FAPECAFES - FAPECAFES continued to improve the producer database and in the process of uploading the database to the website - implemented requirements to access fair trade and organic certification to include the verification of microlot traceability to increase access to export markets
PRODEL QUARTERLY REPORT – October 1, 2009 through December 31, 2009
18
ESCOFFEE General Manager, Miguel Rendon
and Olmedo Canton Coffee Producer
Association Manager, Angelino Abad win first
place at the Golden Cup 2009 Specialty Coffee
award ceremony.
D. Selected Activities Value Chain Mapping
The PRODEL team worked with an intern from the Central University of Ecuador, Andrea
Villareal, to prepare maps for PRODEL I anchor firms and analyze the value chains. Villareal
presented the value chain maps according to subsectors using Autocad. The value chains
are superimposed as transparent images, illustrating product flow, the stakeholders,
channels of distribution, as well as a comparison of PRODEL participating value chains. The
maps also include information on pricing, production, acreage, and volumes.
Contest for the Best Ecuadorian Coffee, Golden Cup 2009
PRODEL co-hosted the Golden Cup competition on
October 1-23 at the Loja Technical University
laboratory. Participants included producers,
exporters, importers, domestic and international
roasters, and nationally and internationally
renowned tasters. The event tested 35 samples,
18 of which scored 80 points or higher.
International specialty coffee taste-testing judges
selected ten finalists. First prize was awared to the
Olmedo Canton of specialty coffee producers, a
group linked to the ESCOFFEE anchor firm for
PRODEL.
In an effort to take advantage of the large number of participating specialty coffee
producers from throughout the coffee growing regions of Ecuador in attendance at the
Golden Cup competition, PRODEL organized simultaneous events on topics related to coffee
productivity, quality, harvest, post-harvest, and commercialization. Participants agreed to
hold the next Golden Cup competition in the island province of Galapagos.
Anchor firms and PRODEL representatives engaged in additional events and activities during
this past quarter to include the following:
PRODEL QUARTERLY REPORT – October 1, 2009 through December 31, 2009
19
Coordination meetings with CORPEI regarding participation in the 2010 annual SCAA
conference in Anaheim, California
Coordination meetings with MCPEC to explore options for leveraged funds to benefit
participating PRODEL anchor firms and producer groups. A total of seven profiles
were submitted for consideration. MCPEC is interested in providing support in the
areas of import substitution, product improvements, development of innovations,
export promotion and small producer linkages
Coordination meetings with representatives from USAID, Universitas Equatorialis,
and the PRODEL program in order to achieve leverage with public sector institutions
to provide continuity to the process of anchor firm strengthening
Participation in the “Business Opportunities with Colombia” seminar organized by
the Quito Chamber of Commerce and CORPEI
Participation in the Export Strategy Seminar for SMEs focusing on the European
Union market
PRODEL representatives served as presenters in the seminar on “Strengthening
Competitiveness through Agricultural Extension” sponsored by Sun Mountain in
Quito
1.2 Challenges Encountered and Alternatives Employed
There is a significant lack of information available to investigate competitive
subsectors for the border regions of Ecuador. Ecuadorian ministries such as MCPEC
are currently implementing studies to determine the most competitive subsectors
for the country but this information will only become available in the future. As a
result, the PRODEL team has relied on primary research methods to determine the
most viable subsectors for the program. The InterAmerican Bank has conducted
extensive investigations of subsectors in Ecuador to include a study in Loja that
determined that coffee, tourism, and knowledge management were the three most
competitive sectors in this region of Ecuador; however, there is no real articulation
among these various studies with cooperating agency actors that are implementing
projects in the field. As a result, some studies have indicated that specific
subsectors that have been found to lack competitiveness by the PRODEL team, have
been targeted for development by the Ecuadorian government and others.
The PRODEL team must investigate a number of anchor firm and producer groups in
an effort to select value chains that meet the criteria for the program. Many of
these anchor firms and producer groups are difficult to identify for the program due
to a lack of organizational skills and limited business management experience. The
PRODEL QUARTERLY REPORT – October 1, 2009 through December 31, 2009
20
PRODEL team is working to forge relationships between anchor firms and producer
groups in an environment where farmers have had little direct contact with buyers
and are not organized to the level where they are able to provide consistent quality
and volumes of product for the market. PRODEL seeks to link anchor firms to
producers that are willing to adopt productivity and quality standards valued by the
marketplace that result in increased competitiveness and greater income levels for
program participants.
1.3 Activities Planned for Next Quarter
Organize workshops for the selected anchor firms that focus on program
orientation, strategic analysis, and business and financial planning. These workshops
will form the basis for formulating an Enterprise Partnership Fund investment plan
primarily targeted to producer groups linked to participating anchor firms.
Continue to research and select new anchor firms. The goal is to select five
additional anchor firms to the 10 previously selected, by March 31, 2010.
Coordinate with CORPEI and other public and private sector entities to select new
firms, negotiate co-financing agreements, and foster participation in local and
international trade fairs.
Continue negotiations for co-financing of PRODEL activities with MCPEC.
Provide anchor firms with strategic business management, key performance
indicator, and competitiveness feedback.
Business planning workshops will be conducted with eight of the 10 anchor firms
selected for the second phase of PRODEL to date.
PRODEL QUARTERLY REPORT – October 1, 2009 through December 31, 2009
21
2. STRENGTHEN VERTICAL AND HORIZONTAL LINKAGES
2.1 Achievements During the Quarter
A. Strategic Orientation
The PRODEL team has developed quantitative methodologies for value chain-focused
strategic planning and orientation based on the premise that what you cannot measure
cannot be improved. As a result, the team has developed quantitative assessment
approaches for value chain strategic orientation. The team has named this approach Value
added, Inclusion and Productivity (VIP). Taken from the anchor firm evaluation matrix
found in Annex 3, a score for each of the axes is plotted on a graph similar to the one
immediately below, allowing for periodic measurement throughout the PRODEL
implementation period.
The green (inner) diamond in the graph below represents the current state of the
relationship among anchor firms and other stakeholders in the value chain, and the red
(outer) diamond is the target that the PRODEL team seeks to achieve. This provides a visual
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
Market
Anchor Firms
Producers
Support Services
PRODEL Strategic orientation
Current situation Desired situation
TransformationDifferentiation
VIP
Inclusive
Productive
Value added
Graph 2: PRODEL Strategic Orientation Approach
PRODEL QUARTERLY REPORT – October 1, 2009 through December 31, 2009
22
representation of the gap between the current and desired anchor firm situation helping to
define strategic planning objectives. The quantitative evaluation for each one of the axes in
this graph to include Market, Support Services, Anchor Firms and Producers represents a
systemic approach to evaluation of the relation between the anchor firm and additional
value chain representatives. Viewing the graph from the bottom to the horizontal axis,
productivity represents the principal element that ensures economic sustainability for
development of producers that we are considering for the program. The red line in the
graph represents the quantitative targeted interaction between support services and
anchor firms resulting in PRODEL activities that generate greater numbers of participating
producers and higher productivity levels in the value chains. It is here that the opportunity
for firms to develop vertical linkages and achieve differentiation through social
responsibility is incorporated. From the horizontal axes of support services and anchor
firms towards the top of the graph represented by the market, activities are related to
product differentiation, transformation and value added strategies.
The various strategic planning stages for the value chain projects implemented through the
PRODEL EPF will be articulated with this VIP approach that takes the following into
consideration: program strategies, tactics, goals, objectives, and overall tasks. This approach
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
Market
Anchor Firms
Producers
Support Services
PRODEL Strategic orientation
Current situation Desired situation
Graph 3: PRODEL Strategic Orientation Tool
PRODEL QUARTERLY REPORT – October 1, 2009 through December 31, 2009
23
promotes a win-win situation for all stakeholders by promoting exports, improving
productivity, fostering producer/anchor firm linkages and adding value to products, and
future recognition will be awarded to the value chains that make progress as VIP
companies.
In the PRODEL Strategic Orientation graph 3 above the vertical and horizontal parallel lines
illustrate the gap between the current and the desired program impact. For example, the
blue (inner) diamond defines the current situation and the red (outer) diamond in the graph
represents the desired situation. The intersection of the lines defines the interaction
between one axis and another, illustrated by the yellow triangles in the graph. Interactions
occur between firm and market, firm and producers, support services and producers, and
support services and the market. This tool has helped to define overall strategic objectives
going forward for PRODEL II. This tool is aligned with the VIP approach described in graph 2
above where strategic objectives are met through the implementation of PRODEL activities
undertaken through this approach. The achievement of the objectives in this strategic
orientation tool will work to reduce the gap between the current situation depicted by the
green (inner) and the red (outer) diamonds in the VIP approach. These objectives will help
to improve relationships among the various actors in the value.
B. Strengthening Activities to Improve Producer Linkages within the Value Chain
During this past quarter, the PRODEL team has made significant progress in strengthening
the producer skills, product quality, linkages with firms, and competitiveness. The table
below lists capacity-building activities and their subsequent results of anchor firms from the
first phase of PRODEL. This table will be completed for the anchor firms from the second
phase of the program starting with the 2nd quarter FY 2010 report.
Table 4: Strengthening Activities and Results for Value Chain Vertical and Horizontal Linkages
Company
Strengthening Activities and Results
GRUPPO SALINAS - Coordinated a new BCS certification inspection for FISPDICA and NAAT-E - Gruppo Salinas provided technical assistance to FISPDICA - Gruppo Salinas held meetings with FISPDICA to encourage organizational improvements
AACRI RIO INTAG - AACRI Rio Intag initiated the Rainforest Alliance certification process, the issuance of which is still pending - Included 70.48 hectares of coffee in the certification process
PRODEL QUARTERLY REPORT – October 1, 2009 through December 31, 2009
24
Company
Strengthening Activities and Results
- Trained four certification technicians
MONDEL - Mondel increased the intensity of workshops and farmer field schools - PRODEL funded trainings that improved milk production, both in quantity and quality - Farmers are applying concepts learned in PRODEL trainings - Implemented quality control to ensure first-rate raw material - Held two meetings with the mayor of Mira, Fausto Ruiz, who confirmed his offer to help reinforce the goat milk project among participating communities - Mondel distributed 50 filters for milk containers provided through PRODEL to the Chauchin, Gruta de Fatima, and Frailejon communities. This equipment will guarantee high milk quality - The price of milk paid by Mondel to small farmers has risen to US$0.35, as compared to the US$0.25 per liter minimum established by Ecuadorian law. Payment is based on quality, depending on best practices followed in the communities - The Chauchin community milk producers received a Lactoscam, an essential piece of laboratory equipment for measuring milk quality parameters - Mondel continued the process to formally organize small dairy farmer associations - The Aso-Mira Association and the El Abejon community connected to the Mondel anchor firm purchased 90 additional breeding stock animals with a loan from the National Development Bank in order to specialize in goat milk production
CAFÉ GALLETTI - In the areas of San Antonio de Las Aradas and El Colmenar in the province of Loja, the PRODEL CABP team supported the implementation of the certification audit recommendations which directly benefited 88 farmers with 229.7 hectares of organic coffee - Café Galletti conducted quality control training workshops
AROMA AMAZÓNICO - Aroma Amazónico conducted 500 internal certification inspections as a result of CABP project intervention, which were presented to BCS - Aroma Amazónico held workshops for internal inspectors, both for organic and Rainforest Alliance certification
SOL DE ORIENTE - Sol de Oriente continued to deliver plastic for solar dryers and robusta coffee seedlings to farmers
COFINA - COFINA continued providing technical assistance to farmers for storage and nurseries - COFINA investigated and established connections with producer associations for the purchase of cacao in the Loreto Canton in Orellana Province - COFINA conducted a total of 536 internal certification inspections facilitated by CABP - COFINA held workshops for internal Rainforest Alliance inspectors coordinated through the CABP project
AAPROCASH - AAPROCASH incorporated 246 families on 647 hectares, 321 of which achieved organic certification - AAPROCASH held workshops for internal auditors for organic and Rainforest Alliance certification as promoted through CABP
ECOLAC - ECOLAC delivered fertilizers to dairy farmers to improve feed production - ECOLAC held training workshops for a group of 40 dairy farmers
ESCOFFEE - ESCOFFEE began distributing coffee seedlings in the Chaguarpamba and Olmedo Cantons of Loja Province - ESCOFFEE and its linked coffee growers association, Olmedo won first prize in the
PRODEL QUARTERLY REPORT – October 1, 2009 through December 31, 2009
25
Company
Strengthening Activities and Results
2009 Golden Cup Specialty Coffee contest - ESCOFFEE coordinated technical assistance for the implementation of the internal control system as a basis for its certification in the Olmedo Canton - ESCOFFEE held a formal training for Rainforest Alliance and organic certification inspectors
FAPECAFES - FAPECAFES organized four workshops on efficient micro-organism management for pest and disease control - FAPECAFES participated in the CABP regional workshop on Integrated Pest Management - FAPECAFES organized two events on quality management for warehouse staff and member organizations - FAPECAFES organized accounting and administrative training for technical teams, FAPECAFES leaders, and grassroots organizations
ASOGUABO - ASOGUABO continued with producer training events in order to improve productivity, especially for the Orito (miniature banana) crop conversion farm
C. Horizontal Linkages
During the quarter, PRODEL anchor firms established connections to develop horizontal
linkages along value chains. Some of the initiatives are described below:
Mondel signed a cooperative agreement with the Salinas Salesian Family Foundation
and Gruppo Salinas to process goat cheese. The Mondel/Gruppo Salinas horizontal
linkage was forged during the Monterrey Institute of Technology strategic business
management training funded through PRODEL. This six month course allowed
management from the two companies the opportunity to learn of complementary
strengths and assisted in the process to gain a level of trust and mutual
understanding that has resulted in the signing of this agreement between the two
firms.
In an effort to increase exports and improve the presentation of Mondel primary
cheese products to include blue, brie, monte caprino, and its Christmas products,
Mondel contacted the Ecuatoriana de Chocolates anchor firm to explore options to
share packaging suppliers.
The AACRI Rio Intag Association carried out research trials for its pest and disease
control laboratory to support its efforts to negotiate sales agreements with
FAPECAFES, ASOGUABO, APROCA, and Aroma Amazónico. The technology
developed through the biocatalyzation pest and disease control laboratory in ACCRI
PRODEL QUARTERLY REPORT – October 1, 2009 through December 31, 2009
26
Rio Intag will improve productivity levels for PRODEL anchor firms and others in an
effort to increase competitiveness among Ecuadorian agricultural producers.
2.2 Challenges Encountered and Alternatives Employed
The majority of agricultural producers do not belong to formal organizations and
therefore lack access to markets that rely on consistent quality and volume
standards. PRODEL seeks to promote the strengthening of existing agriculture based
associations to meet this challenge.
2.3 Activities Planned for Next Quarter
The PRODEL technical team will invite targeted producers and anchor firm
representatives to participate in focus groups and workshops to investigate
potential horizontal and vertical linkages between value chain actors.
Events to train trainers through the farmer field school methodology in areas of
technical assistance promoted by PRODEL will be conducted during this next
quarter.
Activities related to productivity improvements such as clonal nurseries, select
vegetable materials, and best practices for pest and disease control for producer
groups and their linked anchor firms will be implemented during the second quarter
of FY 2010.
Vertical and horizontal linkage activities will be funded through the EPF for anchor
firms and their producers that participated in the first phase of PRODEL.
PRODEL QUARTERLY REPORT – October 1, 2009 through December 31, 2009
27
3. FOSTER THE PROVISION OF FINANCIAL SERVICES
3.1 Achievements during the Quarter
During the 1st quarter of FY 2010, the PRODEL financial services team continued to facilitate
Phase I anchor firms and producer group access to credit and financing alternatives.
Additionally, the PRODEL financial specialist defined the main strategies and specific
activities to be employed during the second phase of the program. The financial services
team supported Phase I anchor firms during the 1st quarter of FY 2010 through the
following activities:
The financial services team calculated indicators using anchor firm monthly financial
statements (balance sheet and income statements). Based on this analysis, the
financial services specialist made recommendations to firms on how to improve
their indicators and accounting systems. This activity helps to strengthen anchor
firm administrative and financial capacities to improve their business
competitiveness and their purchasing power from PRODEL participating small
producers. These financial sector capacity building activities also improve anchor
firm and producer access to financial products and services.
Ensured the anchor firms were included on the Ecuadorian Internal Revenue Service
white list, in an effort to avoid any tax-related problems. The white list reflects the
current fiscal condition of Ecuadorian companies and keeps track of tax payments to
the government. If a firm is absent from this list, the financial services team
immediately notifies the firm. Fewer and fewer firms are included on this list as a
result of this follow up by the PRODEL financial specialist. Due to requests from the
PRODEL Ecuadorian counterpart, Plan Ecuador, the PRODEL financial specialist has
made an effort to monitor this list on a monthy basis.
Conducted rapid financial assessments of all the PRODEL I anchor firms for the rapid
value chain assessments of PRODEL I value chains sent to USAID on December 31,
2009. The PRODEL team found that PRODEL I anchor firms had improved their
financial management practices and increasingly based their business decision
making processes on reliable financial information that is now generated as a result
of PRODEL intervention.
As of December 31, 2009, the financing obtained by PRODEL anchor firms totaled
US$ 4,275,390, a 1.5% increase over the comparable figure for September 2009. Of
PRODEL QUARTERLY REPORT – October 1, 2009 through December 31, 2009
28
the various sources, the National Financial Corporation, Root Capital, Amaznor, and
Oikocredit provided the bulk of the financing. The PRODEL team coordinated
financial sector contacts for anchor firms, worked to improve internal anchor firm
financial department processes, and facilitated the construction of busineses plans
that assisted in obtaining financing for anchor firms. The graph below illustrates the
percentage of total funds provided by each source from March 2008 to December
2009.
Graph 4: Total loan amount percentage by source of financing
The support provided to micro-entrepreneurs during the period from October-December
2009 focused on strengthening relationships with financial institutions, particularly the
National Development Bank (Banco Nacional de Fomento). This bank has expressed interest
in considering PRODEL participating producers as loan recipients due to the value chain
connections forged during the period of program implementation and has plans to
implement credit programs that facilitate credit access to small farmers with an emphasis
on risk management and the value chain approach. In addition, PRODEL coordinated direct
contacts between participating producers and credit officials from the National
Development Bank for loan consideration.
PRODEL QUARTERLY REPORT – October 1, 2009 through December 31, 2009
29
Of the 7,123 producers participating in the first phase of PRODEL, 1,865 have received loans
since March 2008. The producers received a total of US$8,417,818, or an average of
US$4,513 per operation. The mode for these loans was US$5,000, the median US$3,000,
and the standard deviation US$6,217.
A total of 70 financial institutions, including banks, savings and loan cooperatives, and
financial companies provided the 1,865 loans and 41 of these financial institutions are
regulated by the Ecuadorian Bank and Insurance Superintendent. The remaining 29 are
non-regulated. Regulated financial institutions provided the majority of the loan capital
(US$7,524,529). The following graph illustrates the percentage provided by each institution.
The most prominent was the National Development Bank, which supplied 54% of all funds,
Banco Pichincha through CREDIFE accounted for 11%, and Banco de Guayaquil, and Jardin
Azuayo Credit and Loan Cooperative both supplied 4%. In comparison, financial institutions
not regulated by the Ecuadorian Bank and Insurance Superintendent provided US$893,289
in micro-credit. This indicates a clear preference to work with regulated credit agencies in
the future through PRODEL.
Graph 5: Percentage of the loan amount by financial institution
48%
10%
4%
4%
3%
3%
3%
1%1%
13%
11%
Percentage of the loan amount by financial institution
BCO NACIONAL DE FOMENTO
PICHINCHA-CREDIFE
BCO DE GUAYAQUIL
COOP. JARDIN AZUAYO
COOP. CODESARROLLO
COOPMEGO
COOP. TULCÁN
CFN
BCO DE LOJA
OTRAS IFIS REGULADAS
IFIS NO REGULADAS
PRODEL QUARTERLY REPORT – October 1, 2009 through December 31, 2009
30
During the past quarter, the PRODEL financial team established the guidelines for the
Financial Services Component for the second phase of the program. Additionally, the
financial team initiated efforts to increase the presence of financial institutions in PRODEL
areas of influence through increased banking technology such as handheld banking devices
and automatic tellers, the establishment of neighborhood banks and more credit officials,
as well as to improve access to financial services for the different stakeholders along the
value chain with an emphasis on agricultural producers. The PRODEL financial team
engaged in the following activities for the period October – December 2009:
Continued dialogue with the National Development Bank regarding the
implementation of a pilot value chain financing program, which will be based on
ACDI/VOCA methodology. This pilot program is scheduled to commence in March
2010 and once tested, implemented in additional Ecuadorian financial institutions.
Conducted an exploratory meeting with CREDIFE of Banco Pichincha, a USAID
Development Credit Authority (DCA) authorized financial institution. CREDIFE
representatives expressed interest in implementing a pilot program to test the
methodology.
Developed a Value Chain-Focused Credit Manual for Ecuadorian financial
institutions, which will serve as the basis for Phase II financial sector pilot programs.
Conducted a meeting with the Rural Financial Network (RFN) that focused on three
objectives: promote the program and the value chain finance methodologies;
identify activities that could be implemented collaboratively, such as mapping the
organizations that offer financial services in border provinces; and establish a
database of international organizations that provide financing or capital to micro-
enterprise and agricultural sectors. As a result of this meeting, the PRODEL team is
exploring the possibility of signing a cooperative agreement with the RFN. Due to
the fact that the RFN represents the microfinance sector in Ecuador, this agreement
provides the program with a greater level of influence at the macro and meso-levels.
The PRODEL Financial Services Specialist contacted WOCCU’s1 Ecuadorian affiliate,
Cooperative Transactional Network (RTC in Spanish) who expressed interest in
1 World Council of Credit Unions
PRODEL QUARTERLY REPORT – October 1, 2009 through December 31, 2009
31
collaborating with the PRODEL program in promoting financial services, such as
savings, transfers, and the use of technology.
SNV is interested to implement joint activities with PRODEL in the area of value
chain finance. The PRODEL team met with SNV members and presented the financial
literacy program that the PRODEL team plans to initiate in its second phase. SNV has
expressed interest in acting as a partner to create effective financial literacy
programs in Ecuador.
PRODEL technical staff members participated in the National Finance Corporation’s
(CFN), “Financing Alternatives in Times of Crisis” seminar that provided an
opportunity to interact with CFN officials and strengthen the relationships
established during Phase I. CFN, who offers a credit guarantee fund targeted to
small and micro-enterprises established in conjunction with the Andean
Development Corporation, could be a key player within the agriculture finance
sector during the second phase of PRODEL.
3.2 Challenges Encountered and Alternatives Employed
The minimal access on behalf of agricultural sector producers to financial services
constitutes the main challenge faced by the financial services component of PRODEL
during this past quarter and throughout the program to date. This lack of access for
producers is due to failed attempts in the past to provide credit in Ecuador
increasing risks and costs, in addition to the lack of programs to educate farmers in
sustainable credit practices. The PRODEL team has arranged several meetings this
past quarter with financial sector representatives from The Transactional Network
Cooperative (RTC), the National Development Bank (BNF), the National Financial
Corporation (CFN) and the National Financial Network (RFR) in an effort to raise the
level of interest in Ecuador to loan to agriculture producers.
3.3 Activities Planned for Next Quarter
Organize a Seminar on Value Chain-Focused Financing, an event to stimulate the
interest on behalf of public sector institutions related to the financial sector, as well
as Ecuadorian ministries such as MIPRO, MAGAP, and MCPEP. Private financial
institutions, such as banks and savings and loan cooperatives will also be invited.
PRODEL QUARTERLY REPORT – October 1, 2009 through December 31, 2009
32
Develop the methodologies and materials necessary for the financial literacy
program, test the program on a pilot basis, and make necessary adjustments in
preparation of the final version to be implemented.
Complete the mapping of financial service organizations located in the border
provinces of Ecuador, and build a database of national and international entities that
support the micro-enterprise sector, particularly the agricultural sector.
Planned the following activities: mapping organizations that offer financial services
in the border provinces of Ecuador; developing content, materials, and art for the
financial literacy program; and improving the PRODEL value chain finance
methodology. The PRODEL team developed terms of reference for all the activities
to be used to hire consultants or as the basis for cooperative agreements with
partner organizations.
4. EXPAND AND TRANSFER THE VALUE CHAIN MODEL
The expansion and transfer of the value chain model building on experiences gleaned from
the first phase of PRODEL constitutes a key element of the second phase of the program.
PRODEL team members will conduct trainings and workshops with Ecuadorian public and
private sector counterpart organizations on best practices in the facilitation of value chain
activities that involve small producers. The training events will be implemented directly by
the PRODEL technical team and financed through the program. Every effort will be made to
seek co-investments for these trainings that directly benefit representatives from the
participating entities.
4.1 Achievements during the Quarter A number of planning meetings have been held with the following Government of
Ecuador organizations and ministries to include, Plan Ecuador, The Production
Ministry (MIPRO), The Ministry for Coordination of the Production, Employment,
and Competitiveness (MCPEC) and the Pichincha Provincial Council.
4.2 Challenges Encountered and Alternatives Employed Strengthening horizontal and vertical linkages throughout value chains involves
educating stakeholders on their role in the value chain and the merits of taking an
industry-based approach to increasing firm-level competitiveness. The emphasis on
PRODEL QUARTERLY REPORT – October 1, 2009 through December 31, 2009
33
the market and the creation of the demand to pull products rather then a push
strategy from the producers is a deviation from the status quo and as such, the team
has found resistance to these changes. The PRODEL team is working with Ecuadorian
governmental ministries and agencies such as MCPEC, MIPRO, MAGAP and Plan
Ecuador to promote the value chain development model through workshops and
presentations that focus on value chain methodologies for economic development
in Ecuador. The goal is to encourage public and private sector entities that work in
economic development to incorporate best practices for small businesses that
include value chain methodologies for economic growth within their overall strategic
planning processes.
4.3 Activities Planned for Next Quarter
The Pichincha Provincial Council is currently implementing organic farms throughout
the Province and has plans to coordinate a subsequent expansion to additional
Ecuadorian Provinces. This Council has expressed an interest to receive instruction
in the short term from PRODEL technical team members through trainings and
farmer field schools that cover the concepts of value chains, competitiveness,
strategic analysis, best agricultural practices and business planning.
5. PULLING IN LOCAL SERVICE PROVIDERS
5.1 Achievements during the Quarter
Services procured through the Enterprise Partnership Funds were almost exclusively
from local service providers in Ecuador. Services were in the following areas: sub-
sector analysis, events and publications, business development software, and
technical assistance in certification.
In order to organize the large number of potential providers for the second phase of
the program, the PRODEL team has compiled a database of local providers.
5.2 Challenges Encountered and Alternatives Employed
PRODEL QUARTERLY REPORT – October 1, 2009 through December 31, 2009
34
The PRODEL team hired eight local consultants to study potential subsectors for
Phase II. Locating experienced, high-quality consultants that were available on short
notice proved to be a challenge. While the work was completed on time, a
significant amount of follow up time on the part of PRODEL staff was required to
ensure quality products. For the future, we plan to reach out to consultants who are
associated with universities, as they provided the highest quality subsector analyses.
5.3 Activities Planned for Next Quarter
Publish an announcement to recruit highly qualified consultants to expand the cadre
of providers in the PRODEL database on which the program and its beneficiary
partners can draw.
Organize, streamline, and update the existing database.
Offer Phase II anchor firms access to the updated database in an effort to support
and stimulate procurement processes.
6. MONITORING AND EVALUATION
6.1 Achievements during the Quarter
The Monitoring and Evaluation System has been designed and the formats
generated for the second phase of PRODEL. The system includes a causal model that
describes program activities, products, outcomes, effects and impacts. The M&E
team has also prepared the format for the PRODEL quarterly targets and includes a
clear description of the indicators and the data collection tools. A set of M&E tools
has been designed that will allow the team to gather the necessary information
necessary for reporting purposes.
Because this is the first quarter of the second phase, there are no results to report
for this quarter. The table below details the key indicators that PRODEL will report
on in subsequent quarters.
PRODEL QUARTERLY REPORT – October 1, 2009 through December 31, 2009
35
Table 5: PRODEL II Key Indicator Achievements
Indicator Baseline
Life Of
Project
Targets
Target To
1st Qtr Fy
2010
Progress To 1st
Qtr Fy 2010
% Of Target
Achieved
Number of Urban and
Rural Anchor Firms 34 10 10*
Number of families
beneficiaries 13,600 0
Number of new or
improved hectares of licit
crops
9,600 0
Number of new full time
equivalent jobs 6,800 0
Increase in family income
from targeted sectors 75% 0
Increase in Farmer
Group’s sales to Anchor
Firms
75% 0
GOE/NGO Technicians
Trained 300 0
*These anchor firms have been selected by the PRODEL team as of December 31, 2009
To facilitate data processing, the documentation of field experiences, and to
maximize the use of information coming from the field, PRODEL began using the Qlik
View software program.
The PRODEL team began gathering baseline data for the first 10 anchor firms
selected for the program.
6.2 Challenges Encountered and Alternatives Employed The relationship between the new anchor firms for the second phase of PRODEL and
their producer groups has been primarily commercial in nature to date. Through
PRODEL QUARTERLY REPORT – October 1, 2009 through December 31, 2009
36
PRODEL facilitated technical assistance, information for the key indicators of the
program will be gathered more readily; nevertheless, the type of data required for
PRODEL M&E reporting purposes exists on a very minimal basis in the field in
Ecuador and requires a substantial amount of beneficiary training and education to
acquire. Many companies in Ecuador have not worked with large numbers of
producers in the past and they are not accustomed to gathering information from
these individuals necessary for business management purposes.
6.3 Activities Planned for Next Quarter
Establish the baseline for the first 10 anchor firms.
Hold a training workshop with the technical anchor firm staff responsible for recording data.
Begin gathering information from producers for monitoring and evaluation reporting purposes.
7. SUBCONTRACTS AND GRANTS
7.1 Achievements during the Quarter
The PRODEL subcontract and grants department focused on the following activities during
the 1st quarter of FY 2010:
Conducted final grants and subcontracts program evaluation visits to PRODEL phase
I anchor firms.
Supported the activities and acquisitions required by the CABP component of
PRODEL.
Hired consultants to conduct subsector analyses of potential value chains for
PRODEL Phase II.
Contracted with local providers who organized the “Borders of Peace – Supporting
Efforts and Harvesting Development” event held on October 29, 2009, edited its
promotional video, and designed the publication depicting PRODEL phase I results.
Closed out the process for the granting of US$2,287,559 through the Enterprise
Partnership Fund for the first phase of PRODEL with the 20 participating anchor
PRODEL QUARTERLY REPORT – October 1, 2009 through December 31, 2009
37
firms and their producer groups in adherence with established USAID standards,
protocols, and procedures.
7.2 Challenges Encountered and Alternatives Employed In the first phase of the Program, the process of issuing the grants from the EPF was
a complex and tedious process which resulted in delays in implementation. In an
effort to improve the process for Phase II, ACDI/VOCA’s Senior Director of Awards
and Compliance, Paula Wood, visited the PRODEL offices in Quito in November of
2009 to explore ways to streamline procedures for PRODEL subcontracting and grant
making processes. As a result of this visit, the sub-contracts and grants specialist
updated templates to improve efficiency levels in processing the Enterprise
Partnership Fund awards and related activities to be sub-contracted.
7.3 Activities Planned for Next Quarter
Train PRODEL local business development advisors on the mechanisms, procedures,
and requirements that anchor firms must adhere to in order to be eligible for the
Enterprise Partnership Fund.
Conduct a workshop with the selected anchor firms and producer groups to train
them on the rules and protocols required to access the PRODEL Enterprise
Partnership Fund. Topics will include overall guidelines and objectives for the
program, grant management and administration, specific USAID subcontract and
grant policies and procedures, and forms used for the subcontract and grant
process.
Coordinate visits to anchor firms to facilitate the process of gathering data and
completing forms. During this stage, priority will be given to reviewing the grant
application forms, verifying budgets and counterpart contributions, articulating
goals and strategies, and analyzing management performance indicators.
Sign EPF grant agreements with first 10 anchor firms and begin implementation of
their proposed programs.
PRODEL QUARTERLY REPORT – October 1, 2009 through December 31, 2009
38
8. CERTIFICATION OF AGRICULTURAL BEST PRACTICES (CABP)
The Certification of Agricultural Best Practices component of PRODEL was completed as of
December 31, 2009 and met or exceeded all of its established targets. The plans are to
continue with certification activities during PRODEL II with follow up to CABP activities
performed by the PRODEL technical team members.
The Certification of Agricultural Best Practices (CABP) team worked with producer groups
linked to the following six anchor firms that participated in the first phase of PRODEL:
Gruppo Salinas, SKS, COFINA, AAPROCASH, Aroma Amazónico, and APROCA. The
participating producer groups implemented a certification Internal Control System (ICS)
with the assistance of consultants hired by CABP. The number of producers involved in
implementing the ICS exceeded the established targets (see Table 7). Additionally, the
CABP team implemented the ICS with the ACRIM, APEOSAE, and APECAEL coffee producer
groups linked to FAPECAFES in the provinces of Loja and Zamora Chinchipe, as well as with
Café Vélez technical staff in the Cariamanga Canton, where two new associations have
implemented the process.
The CABP team conducted training workshops to train internal auditors in the two
certification standards targeted by the program (Organic and Rainforest Alliance). These
internal auditors began conducting audits of their producer groups, which were also
evaluated by local certification agencies such as BCS (Bio Control Systems) and C&D
(Conservation & Development). The results obtained exceeded expectations as illustrated in
Table 7 below. BCS ÖKO Garantie conducted 12 visits to CABP-designated groups to
evaluate their ICS and grant certification to those producer groups that met necessary
standards. In December 2009, Aroma Amazónico, Gruppo Salinas (FISPDICA/NAAT-E), and
FAPECAFES (PROCAP, APECAP, APECAM) fulfilled the standards for organic certification and
in January 2010, FAPECAFES (ACRIM, APEOSAE), APROCA, San Carlos, ECOCACAO, APEOSAE,
and AACRI Rio Intag will receive organic certification as well.
Conservation & Development (C & D) conducted audits of four groups of producer
organizations as suggested by the CABP team; two of these groups, AAPROCASH and AACRI
Rio Intag, passed the audit and are currently in the process of receiving their certificate to
be issued by the Sustainable Agriculture Network. The producer groups associated with the
SKS and FAPECAFES anchor firms still need to make improvements to their ICS with regard
to Sustainable Agriculture Standards. They are considered to be in process of certification,
as a result. At the request of APEOSAE, the PRODEL team will hold a repeat ICS evaluation
visit in April of 2010.
PRODEL QUARTERLY REPORT – October 1, 2009 through December 31, 2009
39
Table 6: Certification Activities for Anchor Firms in the First Quarter of FY 2010
Anchor Firm Certification Activity
1 AACRI Rio Intag - AACRI Rio Intag provided the necessary materials for the micro-organism product application trials, conducted on five plots of land. - The AACRI Rio Intag Association passed its external audit for Sustainable Agriculture Network standards. - AACRI Rio Intag incorporated 70.48 hectares into its ICS to comply with Rainforest Alliance certification standards.
2 FAPECAFES - With support from the CABP team, the FAPECAFES technical team surpassed its goals for the reforestation program. - The firm established a total of 80 family nurseries that currently contain 54,950 native species forest plants. - The CABP team estimates that plants from the CABP nurseries will be sufficient for 1,374 hectares of coffee plantations. - C & D conducted an external audit of APEOSAE to determine its compliance with Rainforest Alliance certification standards. The association did not meet the minimum requirements for certification. APEOSAE staff must comply with the auditor’s requirement by April 2010. - A total of 109 new producers, belonging to the PROCAP, APECAP, and APECAM associations have joined the FAPECAFES ICS for organic certification (228.25 hectares). The CABP component funded 50% of the cost for this activity. - Another 839 coffee producers obtained organic re-certification for the 2009-2010 period. The CABP component funded 50% of the cost. - The ACRIM association linked to the FAPECAFES anchor firm passed the organic certification inspection. - The ACRIM association will comply with the steps required to obtain organic certification for 258 additional hectares by 2010. - The APECAEL association, a new coffee supplier to FAPECAFES, has participated indirectly in CABP activities. The association’s technical team participated in the internal auditing workshops on Organic and RAS certifications and is currently implementing the standards. The association has requested an inspection for mid-2010. - The FAPECAFES team conducted four rapid wildlife inventories in the APEOSAE area of influence covering Zamora Chinchipe and Morona Santiago Provinces. The workshops, which utilized the Farmers Field School methodology, took place in Nagaritza, Centinela del Condor, El Pangui, and Gualaquiza (Morona Santiago).
3 Café Vélez - The CABP team, in coordination with Café Vélez field technicians, began the implementation of certification standards with two new producer associations in the Cariamanga Canton of Loja Province. BCS ÖKO Garantie staff pre-inspected the Cariamanga Association and the El Laurel Association, which resulted in action plans for both associations. These associations have requested subsequent evaluations for mid-2010.
4 Café Galletti - Representatives from the El Colmenar Association, in conjunction with the FUNDATIERRA NGO and the CABP team, assisted El Airo Association to obtain organic certification. - BCS ÖKO Garantie pre-inspected El Airo Association.
PRODEL QUARTERLY REPORT – October 1, 2009 through December 31, 2009
40
Anchor Firm Certification Activity
- El Airo has 422 producers and is currently establishing an ICS. - The El Airo association has initiated the certification process and is preparing for an organic certification evaluation in mid-2010.
5
APROCA - As required, the APROCA ICS incorporated 120 additional producers. Of these 120, 26 were organic. The remaining 94 are still in transition after the BCS ÖKO Garantie inspections revealed agro-chemical use. - APROCA staff has committed to the necessary follow-up to ensure the success of the demonstrative plots to which the microbiological products from the AACRI Rio Intag biocatalyzation laboratory are to be transferred. - The CABP reforestation program in APROCA produced a total of 4,000 native plant species to be established on 175 hectares of plantations in the Muisne and Atacames Cantons of Esmeraldas Province. - In October 2009, the firm held two rapid wildlife inventory workshops for 50 participants from the Muisne and Rio Verde Cantons during which a list of birds and mammals that exist on participant plantations was developed.
6 SKS - SKS held a rapid wildlife inventory workshop in the ECOCACAO area of influence. - The CABP team obtained the management plan for the ECOCACAO area of influence where the Galeras-San Francisco peninsula is a significant social and environmental conservation zone. - ECOCACAO was approved for organic certification.
7 AROMA AMAZÓNICO
- The contract for updating Aroma Amazónico’s ICS concluded with 411 new producers incorporated into the organic certification process.
8 COFINA - The contract for updating the San Carlos cacao association (linked to the COFINA anchor firm) ICS, exceeded expectations. San Carlos technical staff and producers participated actively and consistently in obtaining their ICS for organic certification. - In addition to the 200 internal audits established through the San Carlos ICS contract with CABP, an additional 384 internal audits were conducted.
9 AAPROCASH - The AAPROCASH Association ICS passed both Organic and RAS certification programs. - The process for issuing their certifications will conclude in January 2010.
PRODEL QUARTERLY REPORT – October 1, 2009 through December 31, 2009
41
8.1 Achievements during the Quarter
BCS ÖKO Garantie Certification Company delivered 12 inspection reports for CABP
participating anchor firms and their producer groups. Four firms (520 producers)
received their organic certificates this quarter; five groups (1,539 producers) will
receive their certificates next quarter; and three producer groups did not meet the
minimal requirements. All three are following inspector’s recommendations and
expect to be certified by mid-2010.
BCS ÖKO Garantie delivered 1,500 copies of the Organic ICS Implementation
Manual, which consists of material developed by the BCS technical team and revised
by the PRODEL/CABP technical team. The manual was delivered to organic
producers that are beneficiaries of the CABP component.
PRODEL CABP sub-contractor Conservation and Development (C&D) conducted four
producer group certification evaluations that demonstrated results from seven pre-
audit assessments. C&D approved AAPROCASH and AACRI Rio Intag (a total of 331
producers) and producers linked to these two anchor firms will obtain their
certifications in the next quarter. ECOCACAO and APEOSAE did not pass their audits
due to substandard internal plans and control systems. They are currently
implementing recommendations from the audit and will be reevaluated in mid-
2010.
C&D delivered 1,500 copies of its Working Plan Calendar to CABP beneficiaries. The
document provides implementation and follow-up instruction pertaining to
Sustainable Agriculture Network standards.
The CABP team conducted three Integrated Pest Management (IPM) two-day
workshops in Esmeraldas, Loja, and Lago Agrio for anchor firms, local NGOs, and
public sector representatives. The workshops addressed current IPM strategies,
including on-site microbiological production.
The CABP Reforestation Program successfully planted native species forest plants on
673.75 hectares. A reforestation plan is scheduled for the establishment of
additional nurseries capable of reforesting 1,110 hectares. A total of 66,550 native
tree species were planted or are in the process of being planted as a result of
donations from local government agencies and private companies.
PRODEL QUARTERLY REPORT – October 1, 2009 through December 31, 2009
42
The CABP consultant contract for a feasibility study in the field with coffee, cacao,
and banana of AACRI Rio Intag’s micro-organism pest and disease control products
was completed this past quarter. Due to time limitations, experiments focused on
short-term goals related to physiological changes in plants. A total of five plots were
established: one in Esmeraldas Province (Atacames), two in Loja Province
(Vilcabamba), one in El Oro Province (El Guabo), and another in Sucumbios Province
(Shushufindi).
Anchor firms conducted rapid assessment wildlife inventory workshops attended by
producer groups from Esmeraldas Province (APROCA, ECOCACAO), Zamora
Chinchipe Province (APEOSAE), Sucumbios Province (AAPROCASH), and Orellana
Province (San Carlos).
Table 7: CABP Key Progress Indicators and Targets
Indicator
Life Of Project Target
Base Line Cumulative Progress To Dec. 31, 2009
Number of hectares for which the
certification process has been initiated
(combined cacao and coffee) 1,500 0
3,432.5
Number of hectares certified (combined
cacao and coffee) 500 0 1,276.5
Number of families with an increase in
their economic benefits 250 0 355
Number of families that will indirectly
benefit from this component 1,500 0 1,618
Number of rapid wildlife inventories (conducted by producers as part of certification process)
10 0 10
Number of certified hectares with management plans in place
500 0 500
PRODEL QUARTERLY REPORT – October 1, 2009 through December 31, 2009
43
Number of reforested hectares with native species shade coverage
500 0 673.75
8.2 Challenges Encountered and Alternatives Employed Beneficiary producer groups have a limited knowledge of environmental issues,
resulting in environmentally damaging farming practices. Training programs on
more beneficial on-farm practices that reach rural areas could be successful in
articulating the affects of poor environmental practices. PRODEL experience
indicates that producers readily accept new ideas for environmental preservation
and protection measures, especially when linked to the potential direct affect on
global issues such as climate change and global warming.
8.3 CABP Lessons Learned Due to continual change in ICS processes necessary to obtain certification (Organic,
Fair Trade, Rainforest Alliance, and GlobalGAP), the PRODEL team recommends
ongoing anchor firm and producer group monitoring of required certification
activities. Generally, such processes take a minimum of three years to implement
with producer groups depending on the product-specific market requirements.
The use of beneficial microorganisms to combat pests and improve crop nutrition
must be expanded. Due to positive results to date in pest and disease control for
cacao, coffee, and banana through microorganisms cultivated in the laboratory
located at the AACRI Rio Intag anchor firm factory, this technology is transferable to
additional producer associations in an effort to achieve organic certification. The
Runa Yuyai quinoa producer association linked to the Cereales Andinos anchor firms
for the program has purchased microorganisms from the AACRI Rio Intag laboratory
for pest control use on their farms in Imbabura Province. Other institutions that
have expressed interest include Endesa Botrosa, and the Pichincha Provincial
Council. This involves research to obtain local microorganisms, training of
beneficiaries, and access to laboratory products. A campaign to publicize this
methodology is essential for encouraging clean farming alternatives.
All field activities completed with farmers, whether large or small, should be
accompanied by reforestation and environmental recovery campaigns, especially
targeted at defending bodies of water and rejuvenating surrounding plant life. Such
PRODEL QUARTERLY REPORT – October 1, 2009 through December 31, 2009
44
efforts are crucial for maintaining humidity and rainfall levels in different agricultural
regions. This works to preserve the biodiversity and is valued by certain international
markets that are searching for products such as coffee and cacao that adhere to
these principles. In addition, due to the mountainous topography in central
Ecuador, reforestation and agroforesty systems help to protect soils and
environmental conditions necessary for the sustainability of these crops.
Implementing certification processes for producer groups effectively increases
prices, provides them with tools to negotiate with customers, and opens up
domestic and international market niches.
9. MANAGEMENT
9.1 Achievements during the Quarter
Local business development adviser for the southern region, Fernando Jaramillo,
was replaced by José Jiménez. Jiménez has experience in economic development
work at the local level in Loja and in the Dominican Republic. In addition, the local
business development adviser for the northern region was replaced by Carlos
Mayanquer who has a background in financial administration and technology
management focused on field based economic and business enterprise development
as well as strengthening of producer associations at the local level.
9.2 Challenges Encountered and Alternatives Employed Rolling power outages in Ecuador caused the PRODEL office to operate without
electricity for multiple hours each day. This has affected the PRODEL work rhythm, but the the team has made every effort to work within these constraints, including completing their computer work around the scheduled black outs, holding meetings out of the office during blackout periods, modifying office hours to coordinate with the hours without electricity. While this came at a time when the team was responsible for a number of program deliverables, every effort was made to meet the established deadlines.
PRODEL QUARTERLY REPORT – October 1, 2009 through December 31, 2009
45
ANNEX 1 – ANNUAL REPORT -- LESSONS LEARNED AND
GUIDELINES FOR FUTURE ACTIVITIES FROM PRODEL PHASE I, FY
2009
Lesson 1: Joint participation in the design and formulation of a Business Plan
The process of preparing a business plan for anchor firms must be participatory and comprehensive, with significant and active presence of value chain stakeholders from the anchor firm backwards to include, producers and suppliers. This will allow producers to actively participate during program planning and implementation, based on their own realities, needs, and commitments. PRODEL team members have worked to facilitate the business planning process but direct participation in this process on behalf of anchor firm representatives and producers helps to ensure a more sustainable process. This hands on involvement in the PRODEL business planning process on behalf of beneficiaries has resulted in loans for their businesses and improved management skills that heighten competitiveness in the marketplace. This business planning process will be streamlined in the second phase of PRODEL to create greater levels of efficiency for Enterprise Partnership Fund (EPF) implementation during this phase of the program. Upon completion of business planning, inputs for the EPF should be ready to proceed with this investment aspect of the program.
Lesson 2: Achieving leverage
In order to improve the results and impact of the program, it is necessary to establish complementary alliances to develop projects of mutual interest. The Provincial Council of Sucumbios is a good example of collaborative work. Specialized personnel from this council can provide technical assistance and resources to purchase tools, but cannot finance the additional activities required by the anchor firm. This is where PRODEL comes in to facilitate the economic growth process through pinpoint financing to help firms to access markets and improve productivity. These alliances between PRODEL and important local actors result in important synergies.
Lesson 3: Firms must have a spokesperson
Experience has shown that the best results have been accomplished with those anchor firms who assigned a person to be directly responsible for the PRODEL project for each value chain.
Lesson 4: Influencing the technical staff selection process within anchor firms and producer groups
PRODEL QUARTERLY REPORT – October 1, 2009 through December 31, 2009
46
Given the employment crisis in Ecuador, many have felt the pressure to help relatives, friends and/or acquaintances by finding them permanent, good paying employment. Anchor firm leaders are required to hire technical experts in the field. PRODEL should be involved in the staff selection process for anchor firms in order to guarantee the involvement of qualified individuals. In conclusion, the anchor firm project staff for the PRODEL grant must be recruited jointly between PRODEL and the anchor firm and the individuals selected should function as full time anchor firm personnel, guaranteeing sustainability for program and anchor firm objectives.
Lesson 5: Influence the long-term programs of Local Governments
Although significant investments were made and results produced in the improvement of the business climate within municipalities during PRODEL I, not enough follow up has taken place since its completion on September 30, 2009, resulting in a potential loss of sustainability. Municipal governments should adopt a more long range and strategic planning process that will remain in place beyond specific project funding and the term limits of elected officials.
Lesson 6: Vertical linkages have been strengthened through PRODEL activities
Improving linkages within anchor firm supply chains has led to increased trust and recognition of interdependence among producers, anchor firms and intermediaries during the past year of PRODEL. As a result, a number of anchor firms have started offering financing and embedded services to their providers, leading to stronger, more capable businesses for both the producers and the anchor firms. In the next phase of the program, the plan is to finance participation of anchor firm and producer group representatives in Strategic Business Management courses offered through institutions such as the Monterrey Technological Institute. This course increases knowledge that serves to strengthen vertical linkages between anchor firms and their markets and anchor firms and their producer groups.
Lesson 7: Market-oriented program is important to sustainability
A number of PRODEL-supported anchor firms have participated in development projects in the past. The general consensus among anchor firm CEOs is that these projects were well intentioned but focused heavily on providing direct services and goods to farmers or private firms with limited co-investment or attention to the market system. Anchor firm representatives consistently pointed to PRODEL’s market-driven approach and see co-investment as a more sustainable model. Direct contact with potential buyers and brokers in the international marketplace has been established as a core goal for the second phase of PRODEL. A list of potential trade fairs provided by the Ecuadorian Export and Investment Corporation (CORPEI) in the PRODEL annual work plan will be targeted by the PRODEL team during the second phase of the program.
PRODEL QUARTERLY REPORT – October 1, 2009 through December 31, 2009
47
Lesson 8: Value chain financing concepts must be shared with Ecuadorian financial institutions
Due to the lack of financial institutions willing to provide credit for agriculture in Ecuador, financing in this sector remains limited. Contributing factors include the asymmetry of information, the degree of informality in the agriculture sector, and the lack of low risk financing products. The National Development Bank, an important stakeholder due to its extensive network of offices and experience in this sector, provided most of the financing during the first phase of PRODEL. The scope of the financial component will broaden in phase II of PRODEL to include additional Ecuadorian public and private institutions that have the capacity to provide credit to the agricultural sector. The focus will be on a financing through the value chain, an approach that has seen increasing success in the financial sector in the region and around the world.
Lesson 9: A financial literacy program is needed in Ecuador
Farmers’ limited financial literacy knowledge creates barriers to their ability to manage their finances and access credit. It prevents farmers from applying for loans and when they do, they tend to request excessive amounts that are beyond their capacity for repayment, thus worsening their situation. In turn, this keeps financial institutions from granting loans, further restricting farmer access to credit. In response to this, PRODEL will spearhead a financial literacy program for agricultural sector producers and stakeholders in an effort to increase access to financial products in Ecuador in Phase II of the program.
Lesson 10: Farmer Field School methodology is applicable as a training tool for producers and other PRODEL stakeholders
The PRODEL team provided technical assistance during PRODEL phase I through the farmer field school methodology, which strengthened the linkages between suppliers and firms. The use of this methodology resulted in a high percentage of farmers that adopted new technologies to increase quality and productivity. The PRODEL team recommends utilizing this versatile farmer field school tool in phase II of PRODEL to train trainers in the area of value chain financing in addition to the areas of quality and productivity covered during the first phase.
PRODEL QUARTERLY REPORT – October 1, 2009 through December 31, 2009
48
ANNEX 2 – ANNUAL REPORT -- PRODEL FY 2009 ACHIEVEMENTS TO
DECEMBER 31, 2009
Table 8: Achievements to December 31, 2009 for PRODEL I Indicators
Indicator Baseline
(1)
Life Of
Project
Targets
Cumulati
ve
Progress
To Sep
2008
Fy09
Progress
Cumulative
Progress
To Sep.
2009
% Of
Fy09
Target
Achieved
Number of families
linked to anchor
firms receiving
PRODEL assistance
2,295 8,000 2,750 6,339 9,089 113%
Hectares of licit crops
cultivated by
producer families
supplying PRODEL
anchor firms
2,296 4,000 2,800 10,309 13,109 327%
Number of new full
time equivalent jobs
for producers linked
with PRODEL
anchor firms
1,032 4,000 2,008 6,282 8,290 207%
Increase in anchor
firms sales ($) 43,025,058 51,762,500(2) 43,025,058 44,305,245(3) 44,305,245(3) 86%
Number of small and
medium enterprises
(anchor firms)
assisted by the
PRODEL program
0 20 10 10 20 100%
Number of
Municipalities
assisted and that
contributed to
improve the business
0 10 4 8 12 120%
PRODEL QUARTERLY REPORT – October 1, 2009 through December 31, 2009
49
environment
(1) The PRODEL team has also worked with the families included in the baseline. (2) December 31, 2009 target according to Ecuadorian Fiscal Year.
(3) December 31, 2008 progress according to Ecuadorian Fiscal Year. The new information for the increase in anchor firm sales figure to December 31, 2009 will be available as of April 30, 2010 which corresponds to the date that the Ecuadorian Business
Superintendent requires the information.
PRODEL QUARTERLY REPORT – October 1, 2009 through December 31, 2009
50
1 Gestión de Mercado 100% 5.00
1.1 Promedio de crecimiento en ventas de los últimos cinco añosValores inferiores al 1,00% = -5 ; 1,01% - 4,00% = 1 ; 4,01% -
8,00% = 2 ; 8,01% - 12,00% = 3 ; 12,01% - 15,00% = 4 ; más de 15%5
1.2Crecimiento promedio proyectado para los próximos cinco
años
No posee información = 0; Valores inferiores al 1,00% = -5 ;
1,01% - 4,00% = 1 ; 4,01% - 8,00% = 2 ; 8,01% - 12,00% = 3 ; 10% 5
1.3 Maneja información de mercadoNinguna = 0 ; Estudio de mercado actualizado (desde año 2008)
= 3 ; Plan de Marketing actualizado (desde año 2008) = 5 10% 5
1.4 Cobertura geográfica de las ventasCantonal = 1 ; Provincial = 2 ; Regional = 3 ; Nacional / Exporta
indirectamente = 4 ; Exporta directamente = 520% 5
1.5 Actividades de comunicación realizadas el periodo anterior (año 2008)Ninguna = 0 ; Actividades de comunicación realizadas = 1 ;
Actividades + presupuesto = 2 ; Actividades + presupuesto + 15% 5
1.6 Concentración del 80% de ventas en clientes 1 a 2 clientes = 0 ; 3 a 4 = 1 ; 5 a 6 = 3 ; más de 6 = 5 15% 5
1.7 Concentración del 80% de ventas en productos1 a 2 productos = 0 ; 3 a 4 = 1 ; 5 a 6 = 3 ; 7 a 15 = 5; 16 a 20 = -
1; 21 a 30 = - 2; más de 31 = - 315% 5
2 Vínculo e impacto con productores 100% 5.00
2.1Relación actual con pequeños productores en las zonas de
influencia de PRODEL
NO = 0 ; 1 - 50 = 1; 51 - 149 = 2 ; 150 - 299 = 4 ; MÁS DE 300
= 520% 5
2.2 Nivel de involucramiento actual con los productoresNinguno = 0 ; Relación comercial (compra) = 1 ; Provee insumos
= 2 ; Provee asistencia técnica = 3 ; Participó certificación = 4 ; 20% 5
2.3Cantidad de hectáreas sembradas en la actualidad por los
productores que tienen relación con la empresa y se
NO = 0 ; 1-75 = 1 ; 76 - 150 = 2 ; 151 - 225 = 4 ; MÁS DE 225 =
510% 5
2.4Cantidad de hectáreas sembradas y certificadas en la actualidad
por los productores que tienen relación con la empresa y se
NO = 0 ; 1-75 = 1 ; 76 - 150 = 2 ; 151 - 225 = 4 ; MÁS DE 225 =
510% 5
2.5Estructura jurídica y/o nivel de asociatividad de pequeños
productores proveedores actuales de la empresa
No están asociados formalmente = 0 ; Están organizados pero no
formalizados = 3 ; Están formalizados = 5 5% 5
2.6Volumen de compra a pequeños productores en las zonas de
influencia de PRODEL dentro del total de compras
Menos del 5% = 0 ; 6% - 10% = 1 ; 11% - 15% = 2 ; = 16% -
20% = 4 ; más del 20% = 515% 5
2.7Potencial para incrementar el número de pequeños
productores en las zonas de influencia de PRODEL
NO = 0 ; 1- 50 = 1 ; 51 - 149 = 2 ; 150 - 299 = 4 ; MÁS DE 300
= 510% 5
2.8Potencial para incrementar el número de hectáreas en las
zonas de influencia de PRODEL
NO = 0 ; 1-75 = 1 ; 76 - 150 = 2 ; 151 - 225 = 4 ; MÁS DE 225 =
510% 5
3 Gestión / Posicionamiento de la empresa 100% 5.00
3.1 Gestión Financiera 100% 5.00
3.1.1Genera información financiera de forma periódica (balance
general y estado de resultados)
Diaria = 5 ; Semanal = 3 ; Quincenal = 2 ; Mensual = 1; Superior
a un mes = 0 ; No tiene = -520% 5
3.1.2Promedio de la rentabilidad sobre activos de los dos últimos
periodos
Valores negativos o iguales a cero = -5 ; 1% - 5% = 1 ; 6% - 10%
= 2 ; 11% -15% = 3 ; 16% - 20% = 4 ; más de 20% = 5 25%5
3.1.3 Promedio de prueba ácida de los dos últimos periodosAsignar 5 puntos si se encuentra entre 10% al 15%, 3 puntos si
esta entre 5% y 10% ó entre 15% y 20%; Otros valores calificar 20%5
3.1.4Nivel de apalancamiento (Pasivos / Patrimonio) del último
periodo
Asignar 5 puntos si su valor es menor al 50% ; 3 puntos si se
encuentra entre 50% y 100%; 1 punto si se encuentra entre 100% 20%5
3.1.5 Estado actual en lista blanca del SRI SI = 5 ; NO = -515%
5
3.2 Gestión Operativa 100% 5.00
3.2.1 Eficiencia (Gastos operativos / Total ventas) año 2008Menos de 8% = 5 ; entre 9% y 12% = 4 ; entre 13% y 16% = 3 ;
entre 17% y 20% = 2 ; entre 21% y 24% = 1 ; más de 25% = 025% 5
3.2.2 Certificaciones (BPM , ISO , etc)Sin certificación = 0 ; 1 Certificación = 1 ; 2 certificaciones = 3 ;
más de 2 certificaciones = 515% 5
3.2.3 Actividades de mejoramiento continuoNo tiene = 0 ; Manual de procesos = 1 ; Actividades de
planificación y Manual de procesos = 2 ; Actividades de 15% 5
3.2.4 Herramientas de gestión para alineamientoPlan Estratégico (PE) = 1; PE + POA = 2; PE + POA +
Sistemas de Información (SI) = 4; PE + POA + SI + BSC = 520% 5
3.2.5 Nivel de tecnificación propio o tercerizadoArtesanal = 1 ; Semi Tecnificado = 2 ; Tecnificado = 3; Ultima
tecnología = 525% 5
3.3 Gestión Interna 100% 5.00
CalificaciónCriterios de Selección Criterios de segundo nivelPeso criterios de
segundo nivel
ANNEX 3 – ANCHOR FIRM EVALUATION MATRIX
PRODEL QUARTERLY REPORT – October 1, 2009 through December 31, 2009
51
3.3 Gestión Interna 100% 5.00
3.3.1 Años de funcionamiento Menos de 3 años = 0 ; 3 - 5 = 3 ; más de 5 años = 5 5% 5
3.3.2 Estructura organizacional administrativaJefatura operativa: decisiones y operaciones centralizadas en una o
dos personas = 0; Esquema organizacional definido: 20% 5
3.3.3 Nivel de competencias Menos del 5% del personal tiene formación universitaria = 1 ; 6%-
10% = 2 ; 11% - 15% = 3 ; 15% - 20% = 4 ; más del 20% = 520% 5
3.3.4 Investigación y desarrolloEventualmente realiza I&D = 0; Realiza periódicamente (al
menos anual) actividades de I&D = 2; I&D es parte de su 15% 5
3.3.5 InnovaciónHa logrado la empresa diferenciación en calidad por innovación
en Tecnología = 1, Tecnología + Procesos = 3; Tecnología + 25% 5
3.3.6 Normativa internaNo posee reglamentos y normativas internas = 0; Posee
reglamentos y normativas internas = 3 ; Se utiliza dentro de las 15% 5
3.4 Competitividad 100% 5.00
3.4.1 Ventaja Competitiva sostenibleCapacidad o recurso es Valioso (V) = 1; V + Diferente (D) = 2;
V + D + Caro de Imitar (C) = 4; V + D + C + Insustituible = 5 25% 5
3.4.2 Utiliza herramientas informáticas para su gestiónNo = 0 ; Software contable no integrado con producción y ventas
= 1 ; software contable integrado con producción y ventas = 2 ; 20% 5
3.4.3 La empresa tiene una página web propiaNo = 0 ; Informativa únicamente = 1 ; Informativa y correo
electrónico = 2 ; informativa + correo electrónico + permite 10% 5
3.4.4 Maneja un sistema de servicio al cliente y/o post ventaNo = 0; Personalizado = 3; CRM = 5
20% 5
3.4.5 La empresa tiene un sistema de gestión para el talento humanoNo = 0 ; Tiene organigrama = 1 ; Organigrama + manual de
funciones = 2 ; Organigrama + manual de funciones + 25% 5
3.5 Disponibilidad de recursos 100% 5.00
3.5.1Número de fuentes de financiamiento abiertas que posee en la
actualidad No = 0 ; 1 a 3 = 3 ; más de 3 = 550% 5
3.5.2Ciclo financiero del negocio = Rotación de inventarios +
Periodo promedio de cobro - Periodo promedio de pago Menos de 30 días = 5 ; 30 - 45 = 3 ; 46 - 90 = 1 ; más de 90 = -550% 5
3.6 Producto 100% 5.00
3.6.1Productos poseen registro sanitario y demás requsitos para ser
expendido. No = 0 ; Cumple en un 50% = 3 ; Cumple al 100% = 530% 5
3.6.2Estado de procesamiento del principal producto dentro de las
ventasMateria prima = 1 ; Semi elaborado = 3 ; Procesado = 5 30% 5
3.6.3El principal producto que vende la empresa posee algún tipo
de certificación. SI = 5 ; NO = 025% 5
3.6.4 Cómo calificaría el posicionamiento de la marca?No está posicionada = 0 ; Posicionada en un 25% = 1 ;
Posicionada en un 50% =2 ; Posicionada en un 75% = 4 ; 15% 5
4 Referencias Profesionales 100% 5.00
4.1Referencias por parte de los productores / Para el caso de
empresas actuales, existe involucramiento con los
NO = 0 ; Malas = -5 ; Buenas = 1 ; Muy Buenas = 3 ;
Excelentes = 535% 5
4.2Referencias por parte de los clientes / Para el caso de
empresas actuales cumple con envío de información y
NO = 0 ; Malas = -5 ; Buenas = 1 ; Muy Buenas = 3 ;
Excelentes = 530% 5
4.3Referencias por parte de la comunidad o el entorno / Para el
caso de empresas actuales cumple con las metas previstas?
NO = 0 ; Malas = -5 ; Buenas = 1 ; Muy Buenas = 3 ;
Excelentes = 535% 5
5 Acceso a servicios de apoyo 100% 5.00
5.1 Acceso de actores a servicios financierosNo tiene acceso = 0 ; 25% de Productores= 1 ; 50% de
Productores=2 ; 75% de Productores tienen fácil acceso = 4 ; 35% 5
5.2 Acceso de actores a Asistencia TécnicaNo tiene acceso = 0 ; 25% de Productores= 1 ; 50% de
Productores=2 ; 75% de Productores tienen fácil acceso = 4 ; 30% 5
5.3 Acceso de actores a otros servicios de apoyoNo tiene acceso = 0 ; 25% de Productores= 1 ; 50% de
Productores=2 ; 75% de Productores tienen fácil acceso = 4 ; 35% 5
5.00 CALIFICACIÓN FINAL
PRODEL QUARTERLY REPORT – October 1, 2009 through December 31, 2009
52
ANNEX 4: ANCHOR FIRM SELECTION SCORES FOR PHASE I FIRMS
Firm Firm Evaluation Subsector evaluation Potential for inclusion (PFI)
ESCOFFEE 3.70 2.97 200
GRUPPO SALINAS 3.61 3.00 400
FAPECAFES 3.48 2.97 500
ASOGUABO 3.29 2.94 200
CAFÉ VÉLEZ 3.37 2.97 250
SKS 3.24 3.00 300
MONDEL 3.18 1.96 400
APROCA 2.78 3.00 10
COFINA 2.98 3.00 500
AACRI 2.92 2.97 10
ECOLAC 2.93 1.96 20
AAPROCASH 2.42 3.00 100
CEREALES ANDINOS 2.62 3.09 250
INAGROFA 2.17 3.09 197
AROMA AMAZÓNICO 2.04 3.00 10
SOL DE ORIENTE 2.17 2.97 10
AAPPSME 2.12 2.31 100
JUGO FÁCIL 3.01 2.94 300
GALLETTI 2.15 2.97 200
Firms and subsectors positioning matrix considering the potential for inclusion (PFI)
PRODEL QUARTERLY REPORT – October 1, 2009 through December 31, 2009
53
ANNEX 5 – SUBSECTOR EVALUATION MATRIX
Nombre de la Cadena
Materias primas
Productos terminados
1 Contexto del programa 10% 5.00
1.1El subsector se encuentra dentro de los 10 sectores estratégicos definidos por el Estado
ecuatoriano y/o definidos como prioritarios por el MAGAP.50% 5.00
1.2 Cuáles son las necesidades de agua del producto primario del subsector? 25% 5.00
1.3Cuál es el impacto del cambio climático y las condiciones meteorológicas en la producción del
subsector?25% 5.00
2 Entorno competitivo 15% 5.00
2.1 Grado de concentración (a nivel de transformación y/o de comercialización) 15% 5.00
2.2 Amenazas de nuevos participantes 15% 5.00
2.3 Sinergias entre los actores 20% 5.00
2.4 Amenazas de sustitutos 15% 5.00
2.5 Entorno: Clima de negocios, factores climáticos, ubicación geográfica 15% 5.00
2.6 Infraestructura pública 20% 5.00
3 Factores de mercado 15% 5.00
3.1 Participación en canasta básica - consumo doméstico 20% 5.00
3.2 Participación en exportaciones agropecuarias 25% 5.00
3.3 Crecimiento del PIB del sector en los últimos cinco años 25% 5.00
3.4 Crecimiento de la demanda a nivel internacional 30% 5.00
4 Factores tecnológicos 15% 5.00
4.1 Alcance de la innovación 30% 5.00
4.2 Velocidad de cambio (adaptabilidad) 20% 5.00
4.3 Diversidad de productos y/o uso final 20% 5.00
4.4 Nivel de valor agregado del producto final en el Ecuador 30% 5.00
5 Factores financieros y económicos 15% 5.00
5.1 Rentabilidad promedio sobre inversión del productor 30% 5.00
5.2 Disponibilidad de insumos 20% 5.00
5.3 Margen comercial de los productores / margen comercial empresas procesadoras 20% 5.00
5.4 Acceso a crédito de los actores 30% 5.00
6 Factores políticos 5% 5.00
6.1 Incentivos a la cadena (producción, comercialización, etc) 50% 5.00
6.2 Regulaciones y legislación 50% 5.00
7 Impacto 15% 5.00
7.1 Población ocupada en el producto/cadena de valor vs la PEA 10% 5.00
7.2 Indicador de generación de empleo por hectárea 30% 5.00
7.3 Ingreso promedio mensual del productor / canasta básica 20% 5.00
7.4 Hectáreas cultivadas en la actualidad vs Total hectáreas cultivables del país 20% 5.00
7.5 Potencial de la cadena para la inserción en el mercado de pequeños productores 20% 5.00
8 Transversales 5% 5.00
8.1 Género 25% 5.00
8.2 Recursos naturales 25% 5.00
8.3 Nutrición 20% 5.00
8.4 Democracia 30% 5.00
9 Liderazgo en la industria 5% 5.00
9.1 Voluntad para invertir 50% 5.00
9.2 Compromiso para participación de los pequeños productores en la cadena 50% 5.00
5.00 CALIFICACIÓN FINAL
Criterios de SelecciónPeso de
Criterio
Peso criterios
de segundo
nivel
Calificación
PRODEL QUARTERLY REPORT – October 1, 2009 through December 31, 2009
54
PRODEL QUARTERLY REPORT – October 1, 2009 through December 31, 2009
55
ANNEX 6 – PRODEL I ANCHOR FIRM EVALUATION MATRIX SUMMARIES
Nombre de la empresa Comercializadora Aroma Amazónico Aromazónico Cia. Ltda.
RUC 1792143535001
Figura Jurídica Cia. Limitada. Comercializadora
Cadena de valor Cacao
Organización con o sin fines de lucro Con fines de lucro
Dirección de la empresa Av. El Progreso 1006 y 10 de Agosto, Nueva Loja
Teléfono de la empresa (06) 2835106
Fax de la empresa (06) 2835106
Dirección de correo electrónico de la persona de contacto [email protected]
Dirección de la página web www.aromaamazonico.com
1 Gestión de Mercado 0.65
2 Vínculo e impacto con productores 3.80
3 Gestión / Posicionamiento de la empresa 1.49
3.1 Gestión Financiera (0.30)
3.2 Gestión Operativa 0.95
3.3 Gestión Interna 2.60
3.4 Competitividad 1.65
3.5 Disponibilidad de recursos 4.00
3.6 Producto 3.20
4 Referencias Profesionales 3.60
2.31
Calificación
CALIFICACIÓN FINAL
Criterios de Selección Criterios de segundo nivel
Nombre de la empresa AAPROCASH
RUC 2191706385001
Figura Jurídica Asociación Artesanal
Cadena de valor Cacao
Organización con o sin fines de lucro Con fines de lucro
Dirección de la empresa Av. de la Policía y Rocafuerte, esq., Shushufindi
Teléfono de la empresa 06 2839085
Fax de la empresa 06 2839085
Dirección de correo electrónico de la persona de contacto [email protected]
Dirección de la página web No tiene No tiene
1 Gestión de Mercado 1.00
2 Vínculo e impacto con productores 4.20
3 Gestión / Posicionamiento de la empresa 1.82
3.1 Gestión Financiera 2.20
3.2 Gestión Operativa 1.20
3.3 Gestión Interna 1.65
3.4 Competitividad 0.70
3.5 Disponibilidad de recursos 4.00
3.6 Producto 1.95
4 Referencias Profesionales 4.40
2.70
Calificación
CALIFICACIÓN FINAL
Criterios de Selección Criterios de segundo nivel
PRODEL QUARTERLY REPORT – October 1, 2009 through December 31, 2009
56
Nombre de la empresa
RUC 0991280855001
Figura Jurídica Sociedad Anónima
Cadena de valor Cacao
Organización con o sin fines de lucro Con fines de lucro
Dirección de la empresa
Teléfono de la empresa (593 4) 2513420
Fax de la empresa (593 4) 2513649
Dirección de correo electrónico de la persona de contacto [email protected]; [email protected]
Dirección de la página web www.cofinacocoa.com
1 Gestión de Mercado 1.90
2 Vínculo e impacto con productores 4.05
3 Gestión / Posicionamiento de la empresa 2.81
3.1 Gestión Financiera 2.45
3.2 Gestión Operativa 1.60
3.3 Gestión Interna 3.35
3.4 Competitividad 2.50
3.5 Disponibilidad de recursos 5.00
3.6 Producto 3.35
4 Referencias Profesionales 4.30
3.15
COFINA Chocolates Finos Nacionales S.A.
Calificación
CALIFICACIÓN FINAL
Criterios de Selección Criterios de segundo nivel
Km 11 vía Durán - Tambo (300 m pasando peaje)
Nombre de la empresa
RUC
Figura Jurídica
Cadena de valor
Organización con o sin fines de lucro
Dirección de la empresa
Teléfono de la empresa
Fax de la empresa
Dirección de correo electrónico de la persona de contacto
Dirección de la página web
1 Gestión de Mercado 1.55
2 Vínculo e impacto con productores 3.10
3 Gestión / Posicionamiento de la empresa 1.88
3.1 Gestión Financiera 2.25
3.2 Gestión Operativa 1.95
3.3 Gestión Interna 0.70
3.4 Competitividad 0.55
3.5 Disponibilidad de recursos 5.00
3.6 Producto 1.95
4 Referencias Profesionales 2.40
2.31
http://www.piladorasoldeoriente.com/
Con fines de lucro
CALIFICACIÓN FINAL
Vía a Quito km 2 1/2, Nueva Loja
06 2831181
06 2831181
Criterios de Selección Criterios de segundo nivel
Piladora Sol de Oriente
Café robusta
Calificación
0908637259001
Persona natural (nombre comercial)
PRODEL QUARTERLY REPORT – October 1, 2009 through December 31, 2009
57
Nombre de la empresa
RUC
Figura Jurídica
Cadena de valor
Organización con o sin fines de lucro
Dirección de la empresa Jaime Roldós y 10 de Agosto / cabecera de La Joya de Los Sachas
Teléfono de la empresa (06) 2899290 / 088074836
Fax de la empresa (06) 2899290
Dirección de correo electrónico de la persona de contacto Reny Corella [[email protected]]
Dirección de la página web http://productoressancarlos.com/ec
1 Gestión de Mercado 2.15
2 Vínculo e impacto con productores 4.70
3 Gestión / Posicionamiento de la empresa 2.34
3.1 Gestión Financiera 0.30
3.2 Gestión Operativa 2.25
3.3 Gestión Interna 3.75
3.4 Competitividad 2.40
3.5 Disponibilidad de recursos 5.00
3.6 Producto 3.65
4 Referencias Profesionales 5.00
3.12
ASOCIACIÓN DE PRODUCTORES DE CACAO SAN CARLOS
Cacao
Calificación
2290312399001
Asociación Legalizada ante el MAGAP
Con fines de lucro
CALIFICACIÓN FINAL
Criterios de Selección Criterios de segundo nivel
Nombre de la empresa
RUC
Figura Jurídica
Cadena de valor
Organización con o sin fines de lucro
Dirección de la empresa Apuela, calle 20 de Julio
Teléfono de la empresa (593-6) 2648489
Fax de la empresa (593-6) 2648489
Dirección de correo electrónico de la persona de contacto [email protected]
Dirección de la página web www.aacri.com
1 Gestión de Mercado 2.95
2 Vínculo e impacto con productores 3.70
3 Gestión / Posicionamiento de la empresa 2.33
3.1 Gestión Financiera 2.75
3.2 Gestión Operativa 1.35
3.3 Gestión Interna 1.95
3.4 Competitividad 2.20
3.5 Disponibilidad de recursos 2.00
3.6 Producto 3.65
4 Referencias Profesionales 2.30
3.03
AACRI
Café
Calificación
1090110019001
Asociación
Con fines de lucro
CALIFICACIÓN FINAL
Criterios de Selección Criterios de segundo nivel
PRODEL QUARTERLY REPORT – October 1, 2009 through December 31, 2009
58
Nombre de la empresa
RUC
Figura Jurídica
Cadena de valor
Organización con o sin fines de lucro
Dirección de la empresa Panamericana Norte Km 14
Teléfono de la empresa (593-2) 2823880
Fax de la empresa (593-2) 2823880
Dirección de correo electrónico de la persona de contacto [email protected]
Dirección de la página web
1 Gestión de Mercado 2.10
2 Vínculo e impacto con productores 3.30
3 Gestión / Posicionamiento de la empresa 1.13
3.1 Gestión Financiera (0.30)
3.2 Gestión Operativa 1.25
3.3 Gestión Interna 1.80
3.4 Competitividad 0.25
3.5 Disponibilidad de recursos 4.00
3.6 Producto 3.15
4 Referencias Profesionales 3.00
2.33
INAGROFA
Quinua
Calificación
1790972852001
Sociedad Civil y Comercial
Con fines de lucro
CALIFICACIÓN FINAL
Criterios de Selección Criterios de segundo nivel
Nombre de la empresa
RUC
Figura Jurídica
Cadena de valor
Organización con o sin fines de lucro
Dirección de la empresa Calderón, Psje Sta. Fe 145 y Duchicela
Teléfono de la empresa (593-2) 2821814
Fax de la empresa (593-2) 2436615
Dirección de correo electrónico de la persona de contacto [email protected]
Dirección de la página web www.cerealesandinos.com
1 Gestión de Mercado 2.05
2 Vínculo e impacto con productores 3.00
3 Gestión / Posicionamiento de la empresa 2.45
3.1 Gestión Financiera 1.10
3.2 Gestión Operativa 1.40
3.3 Gestión Interna 3.55
3.4 Competitividad 3.30
3.5 Disponibilidad de recursos 4.00
3.6 Producto 3.15
4 Referencias Profesionales 5.00
2.70
CEREALES ANDINOS
Quinua
Calificación
1792043786001
Cía. Ltda.
Con fines de lucro
CALIFICACIÓN FINAL
Criterios de Selección Criterios de segundo nivel
PRODEL QUARTERLY REPORT – October 1, 2009 through December 31, 2009
59
Nombre de la empresa
RUC
Figura Jurídica
Cadena de valor
Organización con o sin fines de lucro
Dirección de la empresa Ulpiano Becerra Lote 4
Teléfono de la empresa (593-2) 2827129
Fax de la empresa (593-2) 2527361
Dirección de correo electrónico de la persona de contacto [email protected]
Dirección de la página web www.cafegalleti.com
1 Gestión de Mercado 2.30
2 Vínculo e impacto con productores 2.50
3 Gestión / Posicionamiento de la empresa 1.79
3.1 Gestión Financiera 2.80
3.2 Gestión Operativa 1.00
3.3 Gestión Interna 1.85
3.4 Competitividad 0.85
3.5 Disponibilidad de recursos (1.00)
3.6 Producto 4.55
4 Referencias Profesionales 1.70
2.20
CAFÉ GALLETI
Café
Calificación
1001597960001
Empresa Artesanal Productora de Alimentos
Con fines de lucro
CALIFICACIÓN FINAL
Criterios de Selección Criterios de segundo nivel
Nombre de la empresa
RUC
Figura Jurídica
Cadena de valor
Organización con o sin fines de lucro
Dirección de la empresa Km 2.5 Sangolquí - Amaguaña
Teléfono de la empresa (593-2) 2336116
Fax de la empresa
Dirección de correo electrónico de la persona de contacto [email protected]
Dirección de la página web
1 Gestión de Mercado 3.25
2 Vínculo e impacto con productores 3.30
3 Gestión / Posicionamiento de la empresa 2.76
3.1 Gestión Financiera 1.95
3.2 Gestión Operativa 1.85 3.3 Gestión Interna 4.55 3.4 Competitividad 2.50 3.5 Disponibilidad de recursos 4.00 3.6 Producto 3.15 4 Referencias Profesionales 5.00
3.21
MONDEL
Lácteos
Calificación
1791394836001
Sociedad Anónima
Con fines de lucro
CALIFICACIÓN FINAL
Criterios de Selección Criterios de segundo nivel
PRODEL QUARTERLY REPORT – October 1, 2009 through December 31, 2009
60
Nombre de la empresa
RUC 1191705862001
Figura Jurídica
Cadena de valor Hierbas aromáticas y medicinales
Organización con o sin fines de lucro Con fines de lucro
Dirección de la empresa
Teléfono de la empresa 2572338
Fax de la empresa 2572338
Dirección de correo electrónico de la persona de contacto [email protected]
Dirección de la página web http://www.horchata-lojana.com/
1 Gestión de Mercado 1.50
2 Vínculo e impacto con productores 2.80
3 Gestión / Posicionamiento de la empresa 1.75
3.1 Gestión Financiera 0.70
3.2 Gestión Operativa 0.85
3.3 Gestión Interna 2.85
3.4 Competitividad 1.65
3.5 Disponibilidad de recursos 4.00
3.6 Producto 2.55
4 Referencias Profesionales 4.30
2.24
Oficinas Loja: José Antonio Eguiguren entre Ramón Pinto y Lauro Guerrero Planta: Chuquiribamba, Barrio
Calificación
CALIFICACIÓN FINAL
Criterios de Selección Criterios de segundo nivel
Asociación de productores/as de plantas secas medicinales del Ecuador AAPPSME
Ministerio de Industrias y Competitividad MIC, acuerdo ministerial No 01 - 198
Nombre de la empresa
RUC 0790101006001
Figura Jurídica Asociación inscrita en el MAGAP
Cadena de valor Frutas (Banano)
Organización con o sin fines de lucro Con fines de lucro
Dirección de la empresa
Teléfono de la empresa 07-2950088 y 07-2951046
Fax de la empresa 07-2950088 ext. 227
Dirección de correo electrónico de la persona de contacto [email protected]
Dirección de la página web www.asoguabo.com.ec
1 Gestión de Mercado 2.95
2 Vínculo e impacto con productores 4.70
3 Gestión / Posicionamiento de la empresa 2.32
3.1 Gestión Financiera 0.20
3.2 Gestión Operativa 2.75
3.3 Gestión Interna 3.15
3.4 Competitividad 3.20
3.5 Disponibilidad de recursos 4.00
3.6 Producto 3.35
4 Referencias Profesionales 3.70
3.50
Asociación de Pequeños Productores Bananeros "El Guabo"
Calificación
CALIFICACIÓN FINAL
Criterios de Selección Criterios de segundo nivel
Gran Colombia 23-21 y Av. Del Ejercito, El Guabo
PRODEL QUARTERLY REPORT – October 1, 2009 through December 31, 2009
61
Nombre de la empresa Café Vélez
RUC 1706891023001
Figura Jurídica
Cadena de valor Café
Organización con o sin fines de lucro Con fines de lucro
Dirección de la empresa
Teléfono de la empresa 593 9 9828685 / 593 99679349
Fax de la empresa 2543059
Dirección de correo electrónico de la persona de contacto [email protected]
Dirección de la página web www.cafevelez.com
1 Gestión de Mercado 4.30
2 Vínculo e impacto con productores 2.70
3 Gestión / Posicionamiento de la empresa 1.79
3.1 Gestión Financiera 2.80
3.2 Gestión Operativa 1.10
3.3 Gestión Interna 2.80
3.4 Competitividad 1.50
3.5 Disponibilidad de recursos (2.50)
3.6 Producto 3.15
4 Referencias Profesionales 5.00
2.94
Calificación
CALIFICACIÓN FINAL
Criterios de Selección Criterios de segundo nivel
Persona natural: José Nicolás Vélez Mantilla
Hacienda Piscingallí - San Andrés - Conocoto (Oficina: Reina Victoria N26-49 y La Pinta, Quito)
Nombre de la empresa
RUC 1190068729001
Figura Jurídica
Cadena de valor Lácteos
Organización con o sin fines de lucro Sin fines de lucro
Dirección de la empresa San Cayetano Alto
Teléfono de la empresa 07 2570 000
Fax de la empresa 07 2570 000
Dirección de correo electrónico de la persona de contacto [email protected]
Dirección de la página web www.utpl.edu.ec
1 Gestión de Mercado 3.10
2 Vínculo e impacto con productores 2.85
3 Gestión / Posicionamiento de la empresa 2.65
3.1 Gestión Financiera 3.05
3.2 Gestión Operativa 2.40
3.3 Gestión Interna 3.30
3.4 Competitividad 2.00
3.5 Disponibilidad de recursos 1.50
3.6 Producto 3.30
4 Referencias Profesionales 4.30
2.93
UNIVERSIDAD TECNICA PARTICULAR DE LOJA
Calificación
CALIFICACIÓN FINAL
Criterios de Selección Criterios de segundo nivel
DERECHO PRIVADO SIN FINES DE LUCRO
Nombre de la empresa
RUC 1191708772001
Figura Jurídica
Cadena de valor Café
Organización con o sin fines de lucro Con fines de lucro
Dirección de la empresa
Teléfono de la empresa (593) 7 2583478
Fax de la empresa (593) 7 2588403
Dirección de correo electrónico de la persona de contacto [email protected]
Dirección de la página web www.fapecafes.org.ec
1 Gestión de Mercado 3.55
2 Vínculo e impacto con productores 5.00
3 Gestión / Posicionamiento de la empresa 2.00
3.1 Gestión Financiera 0.45
3.2 Gestión Operativa 1.70
3.3 Gestión Interna 2.85
3.4 Competitividad 1.80
3.5 Disponibilidad de recursos 5.00
3.6 Producto 3.20
4 Referencias Profesionales 4.40
3.71
Federación Regional de Asociaciones de Pequeños Cafetaleros Ecológicos del Sur del Ecuador - FAPECAFES
Calificación
Federación Resolución Ministerial del Ministerio de Comercio Exterior, Industrialización y Pesca – MICIP Nro.
CALIFICACIÓN FINAL
Criterios de Selección Criterios de segundo nivel
Av. Santiago de las Montañas 06-60, 2do. Piso, P.O.BOX: L-11-01-23 LOJA
PRODEL QUARTERLY REPORT – October 1, 2009 through December 31, 2009
62
Nombre de la empresa
RUC
Figura Jurídica
Cadena de valor
Organización con o sin fines de lucro
Dirección de la empresa Araujo E6-171 y Batodano
Teléfono de la empresa 02 2411090
Fax de la empresa 02 2406132
Dirección de correo electrónico de la persona de contacto [email protected]
Dirección de la página web www.jugofacil.com.ec
1 Gestión de Mercado 3.35
2 Vínculo e impacto con productores 2.95
3 Gestión / Posicionamiento de la empresa 3.04
3.1 Gestión Financiera 2.90
3.2 Gestión Operativa 2.35
3.3 Gestión Interna 4.30
3.4 Competitividad 2.20
3.5 Disponibilidad de recursos 4.00
3.6 Producto 3.30
4 Referencias Profesionales 3.60
3.11
LEENRIKE FROZEN FOOD - JUGO FACIL
FRUTAS
Calificación
1707255053001
EMPRESA PRIVADA
CON FINES DE LUCRO
CALIFICACIÓN FINAL
Criterios de Selección Criterios de segundo nivel
Nombre de la empresa
RUC
Figura Jurídica Asociacion
Cadena de valor CACAO
Organización con o sin fines de lucro Sin fines de lucro
Dirección de la empresa Km 1 1/2 via Atacames - La Union
Teléfono de la empresa 06 2731233
Fax de la empresa 06 2731233
Dirección de correo electrónico de la persona de contacto [email protected]
Dirección de la página web www.aprocaecuador.com
1 Gestion de mercado 1.20
2 Vínculo e impacto con productores 4.80
3 Gestión / Posicionamiento de la empresa 2.27
3.1 Gestión Financiera 2.20
3.2 Gestión Operativa 1.35
3.3 Gestión Interna 2.65
3.4 Competitividad 1.90
3.5 Disponibilidad de recursos 2.50
3.6 Producto 3.80
4 Referencias Profesionales 3.70
3.09
Criterios de segundo nivel
ASOCIACION DE PRODUCTORES DE CACAO DEL CANTON ATACAMES
Calificación
891717342001
CALIFICACIÓN FINAL
Criterios de Selección
PRODEL QUARTERLY REPORT – October 1, 2009 through December 31, 2009
63
Nombre de la empresa
RUC
Figura Jurídica CORPORACION
Cadena de valor CACAO
Organización con o sin fines de lucro SIN FINES DE LUCRO
Dirección de la empresa TIBOSPUNGO S/N Y LOS INCAS - SALINAS - GUARANDA - BOLIVAR
Teléfono de la empresa 03 2210005
Fax de la empresa 03 2210005
Dirección de correo electrónico de la persona de contacto [email protected]
Dirección de la página web www.salinerito.com
1 Gestión de Mercado 3.85
2 Vínculo e impacto con productores 4.70
3 Gestión / Posicionamiento de la empresa 2.56
3.1 Gestión Financiera 2.20
3.2 Gestión Operativa 1.55
3.3 Gestión Interna 3.35
3.4 Competitividad 2.75
3.5 Disponibilidad de recursos 4.00
3.6 Producto 2.10
4 Referencias Profesionales 3.00
3.76
CORPORACION GRUPPO SALINAS
Calificación
291505511001
CALIFICACIÓN FINAL
Criterios de Selección Criterios de segundo nivel
Nombre de la empresa
RUC
Figura Jurídica EMPRESA PRIVADA
Cadena de valor CACAO
Organización con o sin fines de lucro CON FINES DE LUCRO
Dirección de la empresa JULIO ZALDUMBIDE 398 Y AV. LA CORUÑA
Teléfono de la empresa 02 6001004
Fax de la empresa 02 6001004
Dirección de correo electrónico de la persona de contacto [email protected]
Dirección de la página web www.pacarichocolate.com
1 Gestión de Mercado 2.65
2 Vínculo e impacto con productores 4.20
3 Gestión / Posicionamiento de la empresa 2.78
3.1 Gestión Financiera 2.25
3.2 Gestión Operativa 1.65
3.3 Gestión Interna 4.50
3.4 Competitividad 3.00
3.5 Disponibilidad de recursos 2.00
3.6 Producto 3.80
4 Referencias Profesionales 4.30
3.39
SKS FARMS
Calificación
1791995112001
CALIFICACIÓN FINAL
Criterios de Selección Criterios de segundo nivel
PRODEL QUARTERLY REPORT – October 1, 2009 through December 31, 2009
64
ANNEX 7- NEW ANCHOR FIRM EVALUATION MATRIX
Nombre de la empresa
RUC
Figura Jurídica
Cadena de valor
Organización con o sin fines de lucro
Dirección de la empresa Km 10,5 vía a Daule, Guayaquil
Teléfono de la empresa 04 6005730 al 35
Fax de la empresa 04 2110866
Dirección de correo electrónico de la persona de contacto
Dirección de la página web www.cafecom-sa.com
1 Gestión de Mercado 2.60
2 Vínculo e impacto con productores 3.30
3 Gestión / Posicionamiento de la empresa 2.84
3.1 Gestión Financiera 1.40
3.2 Gestión Operativa 2.20
3.3 Gestión Interna 4.70
3.4 Competitividad 3.40
3.5 Disponibilidad de recursos 4.00
3.6 Producto 3.00
4 Referencias Profesionales 5.00
3.01
CAFECOM S. A.
Café
Calificación
0991342060001
Sociedad Anónima
Con fines de lucro
CALIFICACIÓN FINAL
Criterios de Selección Criterios de segundo nivel
Nombre de la empresa
RUC
Figura Jurídica
Cadena de valor
Organización con o sin fines de lucro
Dirección de la empresa Jaime Roldós y 10 de Agosto / cabecera de La Joya de Los Sachas
Teléfono de la empresa (06) 2899290 / 088074836
Fax de la empresa (06) 2899290
Dirección de correo electrónico de la persona de contacto Reny Corella [[email protected]]
Dirección de la página web http://productoressancarlos.com/ec
1 Gestión de Mercado 30% 100% 2.15
2 Vínculo e impacto con productores 30% 100% 4.70
3 Gestión / Posicionamiento de la empresa 35% 100% 2.34
3.1 Gestión Financiera 30% 100% 0.30
3.2 Gestión Operativa 15% 100% 2.25
3.3 Gestión Interna 15% 100% 3.75
3.4 Competitividad 20% 100% 2.40
3.5 Disponibilidad de recursos 10% 100% 5.00
3.6 Producto 10% 100% 3.65
4 Referencias Profesionales 5% 100% 5.00
3.12
ASOCIACIÓN DE PRODUCTORES DE CACAO SAN CARLOS
Cacao
Calificación
2290312399001
Asociación Legalizada ante el MAGAP
Con fines de lucro
CALIFICACIÓN FINAL
Criterios de Selección Peso CriterioCriterios de segundo nivelPeso criterios de
segundo nivel
PRODEL QUARTERLY REPORT – October 1, 2009 through December 31, 2009
65
Nombre de la empresa
RUC
Figura Jurídica
Cadena de valor
Organización con o sin fines de lucro
Dirección de la empresa Av. Mariscal Sucre N 70-158 y Machala
Teléfono de la empresa (5932) 2498771 – 2493834 - 091682135
Fax de la empresa (5932) 2493823
Dirección de correo electrónico de la persona de contacto [email protected]
Dirección de la página web www.tropicanoproducts.com.ec
1 Gestión de Mercado 30% 100% 3.30
2 Vínculo e impacto con productores 30% 100% 2.45
3 Gestión / Posicionamiento de la empresa 35% 100% 3.82
3.1 Gestión Financiera 30% 100% 3.35
3.2 Gestión Operativa 15% 100% 3.30
3.3 Gestión Interna 15% 100% 5.00
3.4 Competitividad 20% 100% 4.35
3.5 Disponibilidad de recursos 10% 100% 2.00
3.6 Producto 10% 100% 5.00
4 Referencias Profesionales 5% 100% 3.60
3.24
ENFP TROPICANO PRODUCTS S.A.
Frutas procesadas
Calificación
1792082897001
Sociedad Anónima
Con fines de lucro
CALIFICACIÓN FINAL
Criterios de Selección Peso CriterioCriterios de segundo nivelPeso criterios de
segundo nivel
Nombre de la empresa
RUC
Figura Jurídica
Cadena de valor
Organización con o sin fines de lucro
Dirección de la empresaLOS RIOS S/N ENTRE BATALLON MONTUFAR Y PANAMA - CIUDAD DE
ESMERALDAS
Teléfono de la empresa 593-6-2451878
Fax de la empresa 593-6-2727035
Dirección de correo electrónico de la persona de contacto [email protected]
Dirección de la página web NO
1 Gestión de Mercado 3.85
2 Vínculo e impacto con productores 3.05
3 Gestión / Posicionamiento de la empresa 2.83
3.1 Gestión Financiera 2.10
3.2 Gestión Operativa 2.50
3.3 Gestión Interna 3.45
3.4 Competitividad 2.25
3.5 Disponibilidad de recursos 4.00
3.6 Producto 4.55
4 Referencias Profesionales 5.00
3.31
DEPRODEMAR CIA LTDA
PESCA
Calificación
891710887001
COMPAÑÍA LIMITADA
CON FINES DE LUCRO
CALIFICACIÓN FINAL
Criterios de Selección Criterios de segundo nivel
PRODEL QUARTERLY REPORT – October 1, 2009 through December 31, 2009
66
Nombre de la empresa
RUC
Figura Jurídica
Cadena de valor
Organización con o sin fines de lucro
Dirección de la empresa Panam. Sur Km 11 1/2 Quito
Teléfono de la empresa 2690 758 - 60
Fax de la empresa 2690144
Dirección de correo electrónico de la persona de [email protected]
Dirección de la página web www.productosminerva.com
1 Gestión de Mercado 2.05
2 Vínculo e impacto con productores 1.20
3 Gestión / Posicionamiento de la empresa 2.58
3.1 Gestión Financiera 1.65
3.2 Gestión Operativa 2.50
3.3 Gestión Interna 4.50 3.4 Competitividad 3.80
3.5 Disponibilidad de recursos (1.00)
3.6 Producto 3.75
4 Referencias Profesionales 5.00
2.13
PRODUCTOS MINERVA CIA. LTDA.
Café
Calificación
1790014800001
Cía. Ltda.
Con fines de lucro
CALIFICACIÓN FINAL
Criterios de Selección Criterios de segundo nivel
ANNEX 8. ANALYSIS OF PROJECT EXPENSES BY GEOGRAPHICAL AREA
PROVINCE Imbabura Carchi Esmeraldas Orellana Napo Sucumbíos El Oro Loja Zamora
Chinchipe
Expenses by Province
$385,030 $504,328 $733,719 $300,004 $112,973 $640,505 $278,359 $716,540 $273,049
ZONE SIERRA NORTE
ESMERALDAS AMAZONIA SOUTH
Expenses by Zone
$889,358 $733,719 $1,053,482 $1,267,948
TOTAL 3,944,507