ECU College of Education EdTPA Data Summit June 2014
-
Upload
east-carolina-university-college-of-education -
Category
Education
-
view
108 -
download
0
description
Transcript of ECU College of Education EdTPA Data Summit June 2014
Presented by
edTPA Data Summit – June 2014Diana B. Lys
What brings us together?
Our Starting Point
Goal of the Data SummitJune 2013
Review Unit and Program Level edTPA Data to Develop Priority
Questions to Guide edTPA Work in 2013-14
What is a Priority Question?
Priority Questions have these characteristics:– Be generated from a collaborative process that engages
most of the people working to address the question– Is focused on educational matters, other student-
related issues beyond the school’s control– Serves a narrow focus of inquiry, a SLO, a rubric, a
standard– Accounts for the unit’s current resources and
represents something the faculty want to investigate
(from Data Wise: Boudett, City, and Murname, 2010)
Priorities for 2013-14
First Priority
What courses inside and outside of the
program teach feedback/
assessment?
To what extent, if any do the professional
core courses support our students
and programs?
Second Priority
What standardization do we have in intern
final grading?
Why are there disparities among the
different program pathways?
Third Priority
How do we improve local scoring?
Data Summit 2013 Survey
Break out to feedback survey on last year’s edTPA Data Summit.
http://bit.ly/1ktmxjK
Goal of the Data Summit
Expand our edTPA Data Summit to link preservice performance assessments with other teacher preparation program performance metrics to build a “chain of evidence”
Model data utilization protocols for use at the program level.
Today we will…
Examine three unit-level datasets Begin to examine edTPA scores– Local evaluation v. Pearson scores
Examine one edTPA portfolio, in-depth, with a focus on Task 2
Next Steps, but Not Today
If question or idea does not align with today’s goal, write it on a post-it and post on the “Next Steps, but Not Today” board– Process/procedural questions would fall into this
category:• Local scoring protocols• Due dates• Licensure expectations
Principles Guiding the edTPA Data Summit
ACE Habits
Shared Commitment to Action, Assessment and Adjustment
Intentional Collaboration
Relentless focus on Evidence
Norms for Collaborative Work
Assume positive intentions Take an inquiry stance Ground statements in evidence
Logistics
To be comfortable… Breaks
– Morning Break– Lunch
Restrooms Phones
To support our work… Wireless Log-in Nearpod Google docs TracDat
Find a Partner
Quadrant Partner #1 – own program, if possible
Quadrant Partner #2 – different program
Quadrant Partner #3 – different college
Quadrant Partner #4 – free choice
Let’s Move!
Find your Quadrant Partners, #1-4
Find a table with QP#2
Move to your first table & Take your stuff
PART 1: DATA EXPLORATION
Expanding the Data Summit
A little background…
Teacher education programs are required to collect many key assessments about their candidates (CAEP, 2013).
In Initial Teacher Preparation (ITP) programs, some examples include:– edTPA– Progress Report– Dispositions forms
Research literature tells us to…
Include performance assessments (Darling-Hammond, 2006); standardized performance assessments are even better (Peck, et al., 2014).
Include data from preservice and inservice sources (Diez, 2010).
Engage faculty in data utilization (Peck & McDonald, 2013).
Develop “culture of evidence” (Peck & McDonald, 2013) and “chains of evidence” (Cochran-Smith, 2005) to support faculty leaders in programmatic improvement.
Today’s Data Parfait
Priority Questions
IHE Report Card
Exit Survey
edTPA
Datasets for Examination
ECU Local Evaluation edTPA Scores (Spring 2014)
– Unit level aggregate of final scores and other tables repeated from June 2013 edTPA Data Summit
– http://bit.ly/1pCqPZv
Datasets for Examination
Initial Licensure Teacher Education Exit Survey Data (Spring 2014)
– Includes all pathways in the licensure area– Excludes open ended responses
Datasets for Examination
IHE Report Cards, 2011-12 and 2012-13– Unit level data only
What is a Priority Question?
Priority Questions have these characteristics:– Be generated from a collaborative process that engages
most of the people working to address the question– Is focused on educational matters, other student-
related issues beyond the school’s control– Serves a narrow focus of inquiry, a SLO, a rubric, a
standard– Accounts for the unit’s current resources and
represents something the faculty want to investigate
(from Data Wise: Boudett, City, and Murname, 2010)
Priority Question Formulation, pt.1
With colleagues at your table:1. Assign a RECORDER and a REPORTER 2. Review assigned dataset, individually and as a
group3. Consider Guiding Questions and RECORD
responses/findings4. Examine findings and generate Priority Questions5. Discuss and Prioritize Questions – select Top 36. Record Top 3 Priority Questions
Priority Question Formulation, pt. 2Refine the Priority Questions:1. Join with the other table2. REPORT out on Top 3 Priority Questions
1. Share rationale behind each
3. Question the questions:1. Are these the right questions?2. Is there consensus across the unit?3. What supports are needed?
4. Refine Top 3 Priority questions for the Combined Group and Assign a final REPORTER
Report Out on Priority Questions
Priority Questions
IHE Report Card
Exit Survey
edTPA
Priorities for 2014-15
edTPA Local Eval Scores
UG Exit Survey Data
IHE EPP Report Card
Data Set Questions
Please fill out your top 3 questions about your data set.
http://bit.ly/1v9o547
Let’s take a break!
Check email and catch up with the world…
Special thanks to the OAA team to preparing for today’s Data Summit– Mary Worthington– Ellen Dobson– Jason Whited– Mary Langley, GA
When we return,find a seat with
Quadrant Partner #1
PART 2:EDTPA FOCUS
ECU Local Evaluation Scores v. Pearson Scores
Before we dig…
ECU Local Evaluation Scores Pearson Scores
Limitations
BIG Question
So, how did we do??
ECU v. Pearson Raw Scores
ECU v. Pearson Standardized Scores
Evaluators
Preliminary Priority Questions
1. Review assigned dataset, individually and as a team
2. Consider Guiding Questions and RECORD responses/findings
3. Be prepared to share with larger group
4. This is just a peek.
PART 3:DIGGING DEEPER
Finding common ground in Task 2
Examining Task 2
Why Task 2? Portfolio selection
http://bit.ly/1l2Gmyu
Link to Sample Portfolio, Task 2
Password is summit2014
http://bit.ly/1mhwi0K
CLOSING OUT
Data Summit 2014 FEEDBACK
Please fill out the feedback survey for the 2014 Data Summit
http://bit.ly/1lZrd2Q
THANK YOU!!