Econ 522 Economics of Law Dan Quint Fall 2010 Lecture 8.
-
Upload
jacob-horatio-lester -
Category
Documents
-
view
221 -
download
3
Transcript of Econ 522 Economics of Law Dan Quint Fall 2010 Lecture 8.
2
First homework back today
Second homework due next Monday (Oct 11)
First midterm next Wednesday (Oct 13) – in Bascom 272
Logistics
4
Most organizations are not owned by anyone churches, clubs, cooperatives, charities, etc.
But many corporations are owned can be bought and sold like property
General principle: Organizations whose primary purpose is to earn profits
should be owned Organizations whose primary purpose is something else
should not
Ownership leads to a principal-agent problem
Organizations
5
Open Access Anyone free to use the resource Leads to overutilization (Tragedy of the Commons) Example: oyster beds
Unanimous Consent Opposite of open access – multiple owners must all agree to any use of
the resource Leads to underutilization Example: empty storefronts in post-Communist Moscow
Political Control/Regulation
Multiple forms of public ownership
6
Dividing the mountain pasture among individual owners would require fencing it, which is prohibitively expensive.
Instead, the highland pasture is held in common, with each village owning different pastures that are separated by natural features such as lakes and mountain peaks.
If each person in the village could place as many sheep as he or she wanted in the common pasture, the meadows might be destroyed and eroded by overuse.
Third form of public ownership: political control/regulation
7
In fact, the common pastures in the mountains of Iceland have not been overused and destroyed, because the villages have effective systems of governance.
They have adopted rules to protect and preserve the common pasture. The sheep are grazed in common pasture in the mountains during the summer and then returned to individual farms in the valleys during the winter.
The total number of sheep allowed in the mountain pasture during the summer is adjusted to its carrying capacity.
Each member of the village receives a share of the total in proportion to the amount of farmland where he or she raises hay to feed the sheep in the winter.
Third form of public ownership: political control/regulation
9
Hammonds v. Central Kentucky Natural Gas Co. Central Kentucky leased
tracts of land above natural gas deposits
But geological dome lay partly under Hammonds’ land
Hammonds sued, claiming some of the gas they were extracting was his
(Anybody see “There Will Be Blood”?)
Fugitive property
10
First Possession fugitive property belongs to nobody until someone extracts it, establishing
ownership Central Kentucky would own all the gas, since they were first to actually
possess it
Tied Ownership ownership of fugitive property is tied to something else which is easier to
establish – in this case, surface of the land Hammonds would own some of the gas, since it was located under his
land principle of accession – a new thing is owned by the owner of the
proximate or prominent property
Two principles for establishing ownership
11
First Possession generally simpler to apply – easy to determine who possessed
property first but, incentive to invest too much to early in order to establish
ownership
First Possession versus Tied Ownership
12
First Possession generally simpler to apply – easy to determine who possessed
property first but, incentive to invest too much to early in order to establish
ownership
Tied Ownership encourages efficient use of the resource (no need to extract
quickly) but, difficulty of establishing and verifying ownership rights
First Possession versus Tied Ownership
13
Rules that link ownership to possession have the
advantage of being easy to administer,
and the disadvantage of providing incentives for
uneconomic investment in possessory acts.
Rules that allow ownership without possession have
the advantage of avoiding preemptive investment
and the disadvantage of being costly to administer.
This brings us to the following tradeoff:
14
Meant to encourage settlement of the Western U.S.
Citizens could acquire 160 acres of land for free, provided head of a family or 21 years old “for the purpose of actual cultivation, and not… for the use or benefit of
someone else” had to live on the claim for 6 months and make “suitable” improvements
Basically a first possession rule for land – by living on the land, you gained ownership of it
Friedman: caused people to spend inefficiently much to gain ownership of the land
A nice historical example: the Homestead Act of 1862
15
“The year is 1862; the piece of land we are considering is… too far from railroads, feed stores, and other people to be cultivated at a profit.
…The efficient rule would be to start farming the land the first year that doing so becomes profitable, say 1890. But if you set out to homestead the land in 1890, you will get an unpleasant surprise: someone else is already there.
…If you want to get the land you will have to come early. By farming it at a loss for a few years you can acquire the right to farm it thereafter at a profit.
Friedman on the Homestead Act of 1862
16
How early will you have to come?
Assume the value of the land in 1890 is going to be $20,000, representing the present value of the profit that can be made by farming it from then on. Further assume that the loss from farming it earlier than that is $1,000 a year.
If you try to homestead it in 1880, you again find the land already taken. Someone who homesteads in 1880 pays $10,000 in losses for $20,000 in real estate – not as good as getting it for free, but still an attractive deal.
…The land will be claimed about 1870, just early enough so that the losses in the early years balance the later gains.
It follows that the effect of the Homestead Act was to wipe out, in costs of premature farming, a large part of the land value of the United States.”
Friedman on the Homestead Act of 1862
17
First Possession and Tied Ownership are doctrines for how ownership rights are determined
Next question: when should a resource become privately owned? Cost of private ownership: owners must take steps to make the
resource excludable – boundary maintenance Cost of public ownership: congestion and overuse An economically rational society will privatize a resource at
the point in time where boundary maintenance costs less than the waste from overuse of the resource.
When should resources become privately owned?
18
First Possession and Tied Ownership are doctrines for how ownership rights are determined
Next question: when should a resource become privately owned? Cost of private ownership: owners must take steps to make the resource
excludable – boundary maintenance Cost of public ownership: congestion and overuse An economically rational society will privatize a resource at the
point in time where boundary maintenance costs less than the waste from overuse of the resource.
(either because congestion got worse… or because boundary maintenance became cheaper)
When should resources become privately owned?
19
Branding cattle
Vehicle ID numberson cars
States grant deeds for property, and keepregistry of legal owner
What can be done to prove ownership of something?
20
Branding cattle
Vehicle ID numberson cars
States grant deeds forproperty, and keepregistry of legal owner
No such system for apples Too many apples – high cost of maintaining a registry Apples inexpensive – not much of a problem
What can be done to prove ownership of something?
22
Maximum liberty: owner can do whatever he/she wants, as long as it doesn’t interfere with another’s property When it does interfere, externality, or nuisance
Affects small number: private externality, or private bad Transaction costs low injunctions preferable
Affects large number: public externality, or public bad Transaction costs high damages preferable
Remedies (review)
23
Compensatory Damages intended to “make the victim whole” compensate for actual harm done make victim as well off as before
Can be… Temporary – compensate for harms that have already occurred Permanent – also cover present value of anticipated future harm
Types of damages
24
Temporary damages Require victim to keep returning to court if harm continues Create an incentive to reduce harm in the future
Permanent damages One-time, permanent fix No incentive to reduce harm as technology makes it easier
Temporary versus permanent damages
25
If a nuisance affects a small number of people (private nuisance), an injunction is more efficient
If a nuisance affects a large number of people (public nuisance), damages are more efficient If damages are easy to measure and innovation occurs rapidly,
temporary damages are more efficient If damages are difficult/costly to measure and innovation occurs
slowly, permanent damages are more efficient
What’s done in practice for public nuisances? temporary damages and injunction against future harm but…
Efficient nuisance remedies
26
Atlantic owned large cement plant near Albany dirt, smoke, vibration neighbors sued plant was found to be a nuisance, court awarded damages neighbors appealed, requesting an injunction
Court ruled that… yes, this was a valid nuisance case and yes, nuisances are generally remedied with injunctions but harm of closing the plant was so much bigger than level of
damage done that court would not issue an injunction ordered permanent damages, paid “as servitude to the land”
Boomer v Atlantic Cement Co(NY Ct of Appeals, 1970)
27
Atlantic owned large cement plant near Albany dirt, smoke, vibration neighbors sued plant was found to be a nuisance, court awarded damages neighbors appealed, requesting an injunction
Court ruled that… yes, this was a valid nuisance case and yes, nuisances are generally remedied with injunctions but harm of closing the plant was so much bigger than level of
damage done that court would not issue an injunction ordered permanent damages, paid “as servitude to the land”
Boomer v Atlantic Cement Co(NY Ct of Appeals, 1970)
29
Adverse Possession (“squatter’s rights”) If you occupy someone else’s property for long enough, you
become the legal owner, provided: 1. the occupation was adverse to the owner’s interests, and 2. the owner did not object or take legal action
One limitation: ways to give up (or lose) property rights
30
Adverse Possession (“squatter’s rights”) If you occupy someone else’s property for long enough, you
become the legal owner, provided: 1. the occupation was adverse to the owner’s interests, and 2. the owner did not object or take legal action
One limitation: ways to give up (or lose) property rights
31
Adverse Possession (“squatter’s rights”) If you occupy someone else’s property for long enough, you
become the legal owner, provided: 1. the occupation was adverse to the owner’s interests, and 2. the owner did not object or take legal action
Estray statutes – laws governing lost and found property
One limitation: ways to give up (or lose) property rights
32
Owners today control who inherits their property Wasn’t always the case
Limitations on who inherits lead to… Circumvention costs
Another limitation: determining what happens to your stuff after you die
33
Owners today control who inherits their property Wasn’t always the case
Limitations on who inherits lead to… Circumvention costs Depletion costs
Another limitation: determining what happens to your stuff after you die
34
Owners today control who inherits their property Wasn’t always the case
Limitations on who inherits lead to… Circumvention costs Depletion costs
Restrictions I place on how they can use it Impossible circumvention and depletion costs Allowed difficult to maintain efficiency in changing circumstances
Another limitation: determining what happens to your stuff after you die
35
Owners today control who inherits their property Wasn’t always the case
Limitations on who inherits lead to… Circumvention costs Depletion costs
Restrictions I place on how they can use it Impossible circumvention and depletion costs Allowed difficult to maintain efficiency in changing circumstances “Restraints on alienation” Common law generally prohibits perpetuities Restrictions limited to “lives-in-being plus 21 years”
Another limitation: determining what happens to your stuff after you die
36
Property rights generally protected by injunctive relief, BUT…
Ploof v. Putnam (Sup. Ct. of Vermont, 1908) Ploof sailing with family on Lake Champlain, storm came up Tied up to pier on island owned by Putnam Putnam’s employee cut the boat loose, Ploof sued Court sided with Ploof: private necessity is an exception to the
general rule of trespass
In an emergency, OK to violate someone else’s property rights; still must reimburse them for any damage done
Another limitation: Private Necessity
37
Property rights generally protected by injunctive relief, BUT…
Ploof v. Putnam (Sup. Ct. of Vermont, 1908) Ploof sailing with family on Lake Champlain, storm came up Tied up to pier on island owned by Putnam Putnam’s employee cut the boat loose, Ploof sued Court sided with Ploof: private necessity is an exception to the
general rule of trespass
In an emergency, OK to violate someone else’s property rights; still must reimburse them for any damage done
Another limitation: Private Necessity
38
Three ways to protect an entitlement: as property (through injunction) by liability rule (through damages) through inalienability
Lots of things that can’t be bought/sold: organs sex heroin
Arguments in favor of inalienability…
Another limitation: Inalienability
children atomic weapons human rights