EAT Airport Master Plan - Fly Wenatchee Airport Master Plan. PARALLEL TAXIWAY SYSTEM. ... TAXIWAY...

PAC Meeting #4 Review Materials

July 20, 2017

EAT Airport Master Plan

PARALLEL

TAXIWAY SYSTEM

RUNWAY 12-30

EAST SIDE PARALLEL TAXIWAY CONNECTORS – EXISTING AND PLANNED

±1,700’±2,000’±1,500’±1,800’

EXISTING PARALLEL TAXIWAY ‘A’

54

0’

52

7.5

’

54

0’

‘A6’

Remain

‘A5’

Remain

‘A4’

New

‘A3’

Remain

‘A1’

Remain‘A4’

Remove

Former

Runway

Remove

‘A2’

Remove

FAA Taxiway

Connector

Turnoff

Guidance

RUNWAY 12-30

PROPOSED PARALLEL TAXIWAY ‘A’ @ 400’ SEPARATION

EAST SIDE PARALLEL TAXIWAY SYSTEM – EXISTING AND PROPOSED RUNWAY SEPARATION

ILS

EXISTING PARALLEL TAXIWAY:

50’ to 75’ Wide

@ 527.5 to 540’ Separation

From Runway 12-30 Centerline

250’ Taxiway Holdshort

From Runway Centerline5

40

’

NOTE: TAXIWAY CONNECTORS NOT

SHOWN FOR CLUTTER PURPOSES.

54

0’40

0

EXISTING PARALLEL TAXIWAY ‘A’ @ 527.5’ TO 540’ SEPARATION

52

7.5

’

40

0

40

0

PROPOSED PARALLEL TAXIWAY

75’ Wide

Parallel Taxiway

@ 540’ Separation

From Runway 12-30 Centerline

250’ Taxiway Holdshort

From Runway Centerline

PROPOSED WEST-SIDE PARALLEL TAXIWAY (PHASE 3 – DARK BLUE)

EAST SIDE AIRFIELD

WEST SIDE AIRFIELDAssumes

VOR Station

Decommission

Or Relocation

AIRLINE TERMINAL FACILITIES

ALTERNATIVES

Scenario 1: Meet EAT 20-year forecast passenger growth

(60,000 to 95,000 enplaned growth by 2035)

Scenario 2: Introduce Second West-Coast Destination/Airline

(Two-Gate System with 34-Seat Turboprop)

Scenario 3: Introduce Second West-Coast Destination/Airline

(Two-Gate System with 76 to 90-Seat Jets)

Scenario 4: Introduce Low-Cost Charter

(Two-Gate Gate System with 130 to 150-Seat Jet)

AIRLINE PASSENGER TERMINAL BUILDING – AIRLINE EXPANSION SCENARIOS

DERIVED FROM THE AIRLINE FORECAST SCENARIO EVENTS:

BUILDING LAYOUT SCENARIO 2/3 – OPTION 4

AIRLINE APRON

VEHICLE CURBSIDE

BUILDING LAYOUT SCENARIO 4 – OPTION 5

AIRLINE APRON

VEHICLE CURBSIDE

BUILDING LAYOUT SCENARIO 2/4 – OPTION 6

AIRLINE APRON

VEHICLE CURBSIDE

MATRIX COMPARISON – TERMINAL BUILDING SCENARIOS

Facility Component / Factors

Scenario Passenger Demand Levels Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 Option 4 Option 5 Option 6

Existing Airport Building

Airline Forecast Scenario Scenario 1 Scenario 2 Scenario 3 Scenario 2/3 Scenario 4 Scenario 2/4

Forecast Airline-Passenger Building Scenario (SF) 26,500 SF 29,200 SF 31,900 SF 30,000 SF 33,300 SF 33,300 SF

Proposed Building Size (SF) 19,000 SF 20,600 SF 26,800 SF 25,500 SF 31,100 SF 31,050 SF

Building Size Per 20,150 SF Fire Wall Code Threshold Less Less Greater Greater Greater Greater

Building Exterior Expansion - Number of Sides 1 - W 2 - W / N 2 - W / N 2 - W / N 3 - W / N / S 2 - W / N

Requires Remote Building Relocation Yes Yes No No No No

Building Features Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 Option 4 Option 5 Option 6

Number of Airlines / Departure Gates 1 / 1 2 / 2 2 / 2 2 / 2 3 / 2 3 / 2

Expands to 2-Story Building (Yes or No) No No Yes No Yes Yes

Passenger Loading (Ground or Bridge) Ground Ground Ground Ground Ground Ground

Provides New Building Curbside Entry Point No No Yes No No No

Provides Flip-Flow Building Entry No No Yes Yes Yes Yes

Requires Fire Sprinklers No No TBD TBD TBD TBD

19,000 SF (Single Story: 90' x 260' / 92 Departure Lounge Seats)

Alternative Options

MATRIX COMPARISON – TERMINAL BUILDING SCENARIOS (CONTINUED)

Individual Building Components / Factors Bldg. Trigger Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 Option 4 Option 5 Option 6

Airline Operating Area Expansion (Yes or No) Essential Reconfigure Yes Yes Reconfigure Yes Yes

Expands Airline Ticket Counter Essential No No Yes No Relocated Relocated

Expands Airline Office Area (Net Area) LOS Yes Yes Yes Reconfigure Relocated Relocated

Expands Airline Baggage Make-Up LOS Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

Expands Airline Passenger Tickekting/Counter Queing LOS No No Yes No Relocated Yes

Passenger Departure Lounge Expansion (Yes or No) Essential No Net Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

Passenger Departure Lounge (Total SF) Essential 2,150 2,400 2,550 2,050 4,200 2,050

Passenger Departure Lounge (Total Seats) Essential ±90 Seats ±100 Seats 110-124 Seats 120 Seats 160 Seats 120 Seats

Bathrooms Upgraded to ADA Compliance Per Code Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

Outbound Baggage Improvements LOS Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

Airline Conveyor to Tug (Yes or No) LOS Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

TSA Baggage Screening - By Hand or Equipment Scanner LOS Either Either Either Either Either Either

TSA Passenger Screening and Office Area (Yes or No) LOS / Standards No No Yes Yes Yes Yes

Expands TSA Passenger Screening Queing LOS No No No No Yes Yes

Accommodates TSA SSCP Equipment Upgrades TSA Standards No No No No Yes Yes

Meets TSA Checkpoint Guidelines for Space & Layout TSA Standards No No No No Yes Yes

MATRIX COMPARISON – TERMINAL BUILDING SCENARIOS (CONTINUED)

Individual Building Components / Factors Bldg. Trigger Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 Option 4 Option 5 Option 6

Airport Administration / Operations LOS ±3,000 SF ±3,000 SF 3,900 SF 4,200 SF 6,150 SF 6,150 SF

Accommodates Administrative Staff LOS Exterior Bldg. Exterior Bldg. Marginal Marginal Yes Yes

Accommodates Law Enforcement Staff (LEO) LOS Exterior Bldg. Exterior Bldg. Marginal Marginal Yes Yes

Expands Airport Storage Area LOS Exterior Bldg. Exterior Bldg. Marginal Marginal Yes Yes

Inbound Baggage Improvements LOS No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

Baggage Claim - Manual or Conveyor Devise LOS Hand Transfer Conveyor Conveyor Conveyor Conveyor Conveyor

Expands Passenger Baggage Claim/ Meeter-Greeter Area LOS No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

Expands Tenant Office-Counters / Area (Yes or No) LOS No No No No Yes Yes

Expands Restrooms - Non-Secured Area (Yes or No) Per Code No No No Yes Yes Yes

Expands Storage Area Yes No No No Yes Yes

Constructability & Costs N/A TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD

Economic Value & Financial Return N/A TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD

Note: Building reconfiguration triggers compliance with federal ADA requirements (bathroom facilities).

Note: 20,150 SF is maximum building area without requiring fire suppression systems; firewall separation possible for expanding adjoinging building areas beyond 20,150 SF.

Note: 46,000 SF is allowable building area with sprinkler system.

Note: Future timeframe for implementation for TSA passenger or baggage screening equipment upgrades are unspecified.

- ALTERNATIVES -

AIRLINE APRON

AIRLINE APRON – EXISTING CONDITIONS

PARKING

POSITION #1

(TURBOPROP)

TERMINAL BUILDING

TOTAL APRON = 95,500 SF

AIRCRAFT MANEUVERING = 87,500 SF

AIRCRAFT PARKING = 55,000 SF

APRON SUPPORT = 8,000 SF

VEHICLES

GA

AP

RO

N

PARALLEL TAXIWAY ‘A’

NON-PARKING AREA

TAXIWAY SAFETY AREA

PARKING

POSITION #2

(TURBOPROP)

Win

gti

p S

ep

ara

tio

n

B-I

I T

OFA

@ 6

5.5

’

GSE STORAGE

3.40%

1.5

0%

C-III TOFA @ 93’

±90’

AIRLINE APRON – EXPANSION OPTION ACAP 3

TERMINAL BUILDING

VEHICLES

GA

AP

RO

N

PARALLEL TAXIWAY ‘A’

NON-PARKING AREA

TAXIWAY SAFETY AREA

Win

gti

p S

ep

ara

tio

n

B-I

I T

OFA

@ 6

5.5

’

GSE STORAGE

PARKING

POSITION #1NARROW

BODY JET

NARROW-BODY JET TYPES:

EMB-190

MD-90 SERIES

B-737 SERIES

EMB-190/195

BOMBARDIER CS-300

- ALTERNATIVES -

AIRLINE AUTO PARKING

Lot and Parking Function2015

(Actual)2020 2025 2030 2035

2015 to 2035

Change

Daily Enplaned Passengers - Peak Month 191 221 253 287 318 127

PARKING SPACES (NO OVERFLOW) 379 340 383 428 470 91

PARKING SPACES (PLUS OVERFLOW) 379 407 458 513 565 186

Short-Term * 45 38 42 47 51 6

Long-Term 235 209 239 271 300 65

Rental Car 69 62 68 74 79 10

Employee/Tenant 30 32 34 37 39 9

Overflow/Special Event 0 66 75 84 95 95

PARKING AREA - SF (NO OVERFLOW) 148,400 170,200 191,500 214,200 234,800 86,400

PARKING AREA - ACRES (NO OVERFLOW) 3.4 3.9 4.4 4.9 5.4 2.0

PARKING AREA - SF (PLUS OVERFLOW) 148,400 201,600 226,900 254,000 279,600 131,200

PARKING AREA - ACRES (PLUS OVERFLOW) 3.4 4.6 5.2 5.8 6.4 3.0

Short-Term * 24,000 25,400 28,600 31,900 34,800 10,800

Long-Term 86,400 98,700 112,900 128,100 142,000 55,600

Rental Car 25,500 30,900 33,800 36,800 39,300 13,800

Employee / Tenant 12,500 15,200 16,200 17,400 18,700 6,200

Overflow / Special Event 0 31,400 35,400 39,800 44,800 44,800

FUTURE AIRLINE AUTO PARKING DEMAND (SPACES AND AREA)

Additional 20-

Year Demand

- Spaces -

Additional 20-

Year Demand

- Area -

AIRLINE AUTO PARKING – OPTION AUTO 1

(RECONFIGURE LOT)

Relocate Rental

Expand Short-

Term

New Livery Lane

Expand Employee

New Entry


(RECONFIGURE LOT, ENTRANCE, EXPAND LOT)

Expand Long-Term

Straighten

Entrance / New

Access Point

Expand Employee

Relocate Rental


(RECONFIGURE LOT, NEW ENTRANCE, EXPAND LOT, OVERFLOW)

New Circulation

Route

New-Expanded

Long Term

New Overflow


(RECONFIGURE LOT, NEW ENTRANCE, EXPAND LOT, OVERFLOW)

New Circulation

Route

New-Expanded

Long Term

/ Rental

New Overflow

COMBINED AIRPORT

OPERATIONS BUILDING (AOB)

ARFF AND SRE

Airport Operations Building (AOB):

The AOB is a single structure to consolidate Airport Rescue

and Fire Fighting (ARFF) and Snow Remove Equipment (SRE)

facilities and staff. The ARFF and SRE share many common

functions, including staff, emergency response, storage, and

vehicle maintenance.

PROPOSED BUILDING ALLOCATION:

ARFF: 5,500 to 7,000 SF

SRE: 18,000 to 22,000 SF

Storage/Materials: 500 SF

Staff Operations: 3,000 to 4,500 SF

TOTAL: 27,000 to 34,000 SF

AOB - EAT RENDERING

EXISTING BUILDING SPACE:

ARFF (3 Bays): 4,050 SF

SRE (Total Structures): 16,150 SF

Storage/Materials: 0 SF

Staff Operations: 1,500 SF

TOTAL: 21,700 SF

AOB FACTORS – EXISTING CONDITIONS

AIRPORT WAY

AIR CARGOSRE

ARFF

RUNWAY BUILDING RESTRICTION LINEGA APRON

Equipment

Stored

Outside

SRE SRESRE

Obsolete

Airport

Ops.

Building

Constrained

SRE Space

and Door

Set Up

Constrained

Door Size

and

Operating

Space

Proximity

of

Overnight

Quarters

Joint

Airport and

Douglas

County

Operations

FBO

Airport

Staffing

of FBO

SRE/ARFF

AOB-A1-1

AOB-A2-1

AOB-A4

AOB-A6

AOB-A5

AOB-A3

AO

B-A

2-2

AOB LAYOUT OPTION – SITE A

AOB BLDG.

FOOTPRINT

±35,000 SF

AOB LAYOUT OPTION – SITE D

PANGBORN AIRPORT

BUSINESS PARK

ALTERNATIVES

- GENERAL AVIATION -

FIXED BASE OPERATOR

(FBO) BUILDING

SITE LAYOUT OPTIONS

EAST-SIDE

Optimize GA

Apron Frontage

SRE Building

Disposition

FBO

AIRPORT WAY Adjacent FBO

Facilities and

Services

GA APRON

100LL

FUEL

TAXIWAY ‘A’

JET-A

FUEL

ARFF

CARGO

GA AIRCRAFT

PARKING

GA HANGARS

T-HANGAR SITE

DISPOSITIONARFF Building

Proximity/Future

Expansion/AOB

Consolidation to

Alternate Airfield

Site

SRE

Future Aircraft

Fueling Storage

Locations

Existing FBO

Building Factors:

- Condition

- Hangar Size

- Door Height

- Amenities

- Aesthetics

Long-Term

T-Hangar

Disposition and

Redevelopment

Long-Term

Hangar

Disposition

PANGBORN FLIGHT CENTER - EXISTING SITE FACTORS

Future GA Aircraft

Parking Needs

(Aircraft Type)

REPLACEMENT FBO

BUILDING (±3,500 SF)

F

FF

FBO BUILDING/HANGAR OPTION – FBO A-1

AIRPORT WAY

CARGOFUTURE T-HANGAR

DISPOSITION

TB HR

GA AUTO

(FUTURE)

SRE

ARFF

HR

HR

HR

RAMP

(F)

RUNWAY BUILDING RESTRICTION LINE

TBSRE

F

F

F


HR

F

GA AUTO

(FUTURE)

AIRPORT WAY


DISPOSITION

ARFF

AUTO

OVERFLOW

RAMP (FUTURE)

FUTURE

AOB


TB

F


HR

F F

GA AUTO

(FUTURE)

AIRPORT WAY


DISPOSITION

ARFF

SRE

RAMP (FUTURE)


GA T-HANGAR DISPOSITION – SUB OPTION - GA T-HANGAR REMOVAL SITE OPTION

FUTURE T-HANGAR

DISPOSITION

SITE ADVANTAGES

Large Paved Surface

Visibility (Airfield & Landside)

Proximity to Paved Apron

Existing Utilities

Strong Commercial Potential

SITE DISADVANTAGES

T-Hangar Removal Timeframe

Vehicle Access and Parking

Proximity to GA Hangars

Proximity to Airline Operations

POTENTIAL REDEVELOPMENT

Aircraft Parking (Large GA)

Aircraft Parking (Overflow)

GA FBO Building

GA Tenant Service Providers

GA Aircraft Deicing Pad

Aircraft Fuel Storage

Airport Operations Facilities

Potential Air Cargo Site

Flexible Development Area

Note: Resist Redevelopment

for replacement T-Hangars

EAST-SIDE

GA SMALL AIRCRAFT

HANGARS

LAYOUT OPTIONS

GENERAL AVIATION HANGAR TYPES

EXECUTIVE

(E)

BOX

(B)

T-HANGAR / SHADE

COMMON /

CORPORATE

(C)

Size: 10,000 to 30,000 SF

Stored Aircraft: 2 to 4 Aircraft (Corporate-Class Turbine)

Use: Aircraft Storage, Workshop, Office Space, Potential Public Use

Note: This information is intended to reflect a range of common industry hangar sizes and uses.

Size: 6,000 to 15,000 SF

Stored Aircraft: 1 to 3 Aircraft (Piston-Turbine Business-Class/Helicopter)

Use: Aircraft Storage, Small Office Space

Size: 3,000 to 6,000 SF

Stored Aircraft: 1 to 2 Aircraft (Piston-Class)

Use: Aircraft Storage, Small Workshop

Size: 8,000 to 12,000 SF (Closed Stacked or Nested / Open Shade)

Stored Aircraft: 6 to 10 Aircraft (Single/Twin Piston)

Use: Aircraft Storage, Workbench

GENERAL AVIATION HANGAR TYPES

Future hangars sites are required for 1) new based aircraft owners, 2) tenant expansion, and 3)

replacement for obsolete or removed hangars. Nearly all future based aircraft will be stored in hangars.

The following identifies general hangar siting considerations:

• Ideally, hangars should be developed in a linear, modular manner. Hangar locations should be

centralized or grouped by type and function, and aircraft sizes-categories (piston, turboprops, jets,

rotor), to promote efficient airfield and landside access, and constructed along existing flightlines as

possible, to minimize costs associated with expanded paved areas, drainage, utilities, auto parking and

secured access.

• Hangar orientation should consider weather conditions, and provide adequate drainage with minimal

slope differential, especially in front of hangar doors.

• Hangars must be constructed beyond the runway and taxiway safety areas, navigational critical areas,

remain beyond visibility line-of-sights, and be regulated by height so as to not encroach imaginary

airspace surfaces. Hangar buildings should be separated to meet, at minimum, FAA taxilane width and

safety area distances in providing sufficient access, maneuvering and ramp space.

E

EX

EC

EX

EC

FORMER RUNWAY 7-25 - AIRCRAFT PARKING AREA

T-H

AN

GA

R / S

HA

DE

EAST GA HANGAR OPTION – EXISTING (HANGAR IN-FILL AND RETAIN TAXIWAY ‘F’)

TAXIWAY ‘F’

LARGE

EXECUTIVE

EAST GA HANGAR OPTION – HGR A (ACQUIRE AIRPORT PROPERTY)

EXISTING HANGARS

T-H

AN

GA

R / S

HA

DE

T-H

AN

GA

R / S

HA

DE

EX

EB

EX

EB

EX

EB

EX

EB

ROAD ACCESS- OPTION A (FUTURE)E

XE

BE

XE

B

FUTURE TAXIWAY

FORMER RUNWAY 7-25 - AIRCRAFT PARKING AREA

Note: Site considered for future removal of the four T-Hangars from the main general aviation apron.

T-H

AN

GA

R/S

HA

DE

BB

TAXIWAY (FUTURE)

T-H

AN

GA

R/S

HA

DE

EX

E

BB

EX

E

T-H

AN

GA

R/S

HA

DE

EXISTING HANGARS

RO

AD

AC

CE

SS

ROAD (FUTURE)

EAST GA HANGAR OPTION – HGR B (BEYOND FORMER CROSSWIND)

TAXIWAY ‘F’

FORMER RUNWAY 7-25 - FUTURE TAXIWAY


EAST GA HANGAR OPTION – HGR C (SOUTH OF FORMER CROSSWIND)

T-HANGAR (R)

T-HANGAR (R)

T-HANGAR (R)

BBEXEB EXE

RO

AD

OP

TIO

N (F

UT

UR

E)

ROAD OPTION (FUTURE)ASOS

STATION

FORMER RUNWAY 7-25 – FUTURE TAXIWAY


FORMER RUNWAY - AIRCRAFT PARKING / CONVERT TO FUTURE TAXIWAY

UN

SP

EC

IFIE

D

T-HANGAR/SHADE

BB

B

BB

B

T-HANGAR/SHADE T-HANGAR/SHADE

B

T-HANGAR/SHADE

B

TAXIWAY ‘F’ (REMAIN OPEN)

EAST GA HANGAR OPTION – HGR D (HANGAR IN-FILL, SHADE HANGARS, RETAIN TAXIWAY ‘F’)

T-H

AN

GA

R

UN

SP

EC

IFIE

D

EX

EE

XE

BB

B

BB

B

T-H

AN

GA

R

T-H

AN

GA

R

BB

B

BB

BB

BB

BB

B

EAST GA HANGAR OPTION – HGR D (EXISTING IN-FILL, MAXIMIZE SPACE, CLOSE TAXIWAY ‘F’)

TAXIWAY ‘F’ (CLOSE)

FORMER RUNWAY - AIRCRAFT PARKING / CONVERT TO FUTURE TAXIWAY

TAX

ILA

NE

TAX

ILA

NE

TAX

ILA

NE

TAX

ILA

NE

TAX

ILA

NE

CORPORATE CORPORATE

RESERVE FOR FUTURE LARGE CORPORATE GENERAL AVIATION LOTS

TAXIWAY ‘B’

EAST GA HANGAR OPTION – WEST SIDE (CONDITION OF USFS WINTHROP)

AIRPORT BUSINESS PARK

TAXIWAY ‘B’ EXTENDED

AUTO PARKING

EAST-SIDE

GA APRON PARKING

LAYOUT OPTIONS

GENERAL AVIATION AIRCRAFT PARKING TYPES

Type: Business Jet

Parking Area: ±6,000 SF (60’ x 100’)

Aircraft Weight: 16,000 to 90,000 Pounds

Pilot/Passengers: 5 to 12

Note: This information is intended to reflect a range of common industry aircraft sizes.

Type: Single/Twin Turboprop

Parking Area: ±4,500 SF (50’ x 90’)

Weight: 12,000 to 22,000 Pounds


Type: Single/Twin-Piston




Type: Helicopter:




GENERAL AVIATION AIRCRAFT PARKING – GA APRON 1 (TWY ‘A’ RELOCATION )

F

FUEL

FEDEX

CARGOUPS

CARGO

LONG-TERM

TIE-DOWN

(MIX)

USFS

OVERFLOWFBO (JET)

SRE

FBO ARFF

CARGO

GA HANGARS

FBO (TURBINE)

FBO

(PISTON)

POTENTIAL

AIRCRAFT

PARKING

(OVERFLOW)

GA

ROTOR

CROSSWIND/TURF RUNWAY

ALTERNATIVES

OPTIONS FOR FORMER

CROSSWIND AS FUTURE

PAVED RUNWAY

MATRIX TABLE – PAVED CROSSWIND RUNWAY OPTIONS

Facility Component Factor

FAA Runway Length (FAA Standards)

FAA Runway Design Category

FAA Runway Protection Zone (RPZ)

Assessment Option P-A Option P-B Option P-C Option P-D Option P-E Option P-F

Length Benefit (% of 3,400' FAA Length) 3,400' 3,400' 2,500' (73%) 2,500' (73%) ±1,800' (52%) ±900' (26%)

Length Benefit - Annual Fights (% Total) 2,150 2,150 1,600 (75%) 1,600 (75%) 1,100 (50%) 800 (35%)

Occupied Airport Aeronautical Property (Acres) 65 Acres± 65 Acres± 55 Acres± 55 Acres± 48 Acres± 40 Acres±

Airfield Configuration, Access and Geometry Rwy 12-30

Taxiway Access/Geometry (Turnaround Needed)* Yes No Rwy 12-30 No Rwy 12-30 New Entry

Runway 12-30 and Taxiway 'A' Crossing Yes Yes Yes Yes West End No

Airspace Imaginary Surfaces

Accommodates RPZ On Airport Property Partial Leased Area Partial

Compatibility - Airport Operations / Aircraft Parking Rwy AC Parking Rwy AC Parking Rwy AC Parking Rwy AC Parking West End Partial West End

Compatibility - On-Airport Land Use / Visibility Zone

Compatibility - Off-Airport (Noise, Overflight) RPZ RPZ

Environmental Considerations RPZ RPZ

Constructability / Costs Airport Funded Airport Funded Airport Funded Airport Funded Airport Funded Airport Funded

Economic Value & Financial Return Cost/Use Cost/Use Cost/Use Cost/Use Cost/Use Benefit/Use

Facility Factors

3,400' x 60'

250' x 1,000’ x 450' (Visual Runway)

A/B-I - Small Aircraft Only (Single and Twin-Piston Aircraft)

OPTIONS FOR TURF

CROSSWIND

SITE LOCATIONS AND LAYOUTS

MATRIX EXHIBIT – NON-PAVED TURF CROSSWIND RUNWAY OPTIONS

Sailplane Hangar and

Apron Location

Taxiway Considerations

Former Glider Landing Strip

Does not Comply with FAA

Separation and Setback

Standards:

- Twy Separation (150’)

- Rwy Separation (700’)

- Primary Surface (250’)

- Hold Position (125’)

- Aircraft Parking (125’)

- Runway Safety Area

- Runway Object Free Area

Off Airport Property and

Residence Location(s)NON-PAVED TURF RUNWAY

REQUIRED TO MEET FAA

DESIGN STANDARDS

MATRIX TABLE – NON-PAVED TURF CROSSWIND OPTIONS (LIGHT SPORT AIRCRAFT)Facility Component Factor

Runway Length (Former Turf Length)

Aircraft Category

FAA Runway Design Category

FAA Runway Protection Zone (RPZ)

Assessment Option T-A Option T-B Option T-C Option T-D Option T-E Option T-F

Turf Strip On Existing Airport Property Yes Yes Partial Partial Partial No

Turf RPZ On Existing Airport Property Yes Partial Partial No South End No

Airfield Configuration, Access and Geometry Former Runway

Aligned with Prevailing Winds

Taxiway Access Entry and Geometry Reconfigure Turf Access Turf Access Turf or Paved Turf or Paved Hangar Access?

Airspace Geometry-Design Former Runway Parallel Primary

Compatibility - Closed Runway 7-25 as 'Paved Runway' Not Co-Existent Requires 700' Conflicts Conflicts 700' Separation 700' Separation

Compatibility - Closed Runway 7-25 as 'Aircraft Parking' Not Co-Existent Requires 250'+ Requires 250'+ Conflicts

Compatibility - On-Airport Land Use / Visibility Zone ASOS ? Relocate ASOS ASOS/Hangars Visibility Visibility Remote

Compatibility - Airport Operations Former Runway

Compatibility - Off-Airport (Noise, Overflight) Former Runway Home Overflight Overflight(s) Land Purchase Land Purchase Land Purchase

Environmental Considerations Former Runway Partial RPZ Land Purchase Land Purchase Land Purchase Land Purchase

Constructability / Costs Turf or Paved ? Airport Cost Airport Cost Airport Cost Airport Cost Airport Cost

Economic Value & Financial Return Functional Use Best Use ? Land Revenues

250' x 1,000’ x 450' (Visual Runway)

Facility Factors

A/B-I - Small Aircraft Only (Light and Sport Aircraft)

±1,000' x 60' (Non-Paved Turf)

Light Sport Aircraft (Maximum Gross Takeoff Not Greater Than 1,320 Pounds) / Sailplane Landings

NON-PAVED TURF CROSSWIND RUNWAY OPTION T-B

REQUIRES FAA COORDINATION – RPZ BEYOND EXISTING AIRPORT PROPERTY

NOTE: REQUIRES FAA AIRSPACE FOR FINAL LAYOUT AND LENGTH DETERMINATION

EAT Airport Master Plan - Fly Wenatchee Airport Master Plan. PARALLEL TAXIWAY SYSTEM. ... TAXIWAY...

Documents

Transcript of EAT Airport Master Plan - Fly Wenatchee Airport Master Plan. PARALLEL TAXIWAY SYSTEM. ... TAXIWAY...