Durability in Concrete: Toward Performance Specifications · Performance Specifications and...
Transcript of Durability in Concrete: Toward Performance Specifications · Performance Specifications and...
Performance Specifications and Durability Slides Prepared by Jason Weiss Slide 1 of 32
Durability in Concrete: Toward Performance Specifications
Jason Weiss
Oregon State University
November 16th 2016
Performance Specifications and Durability Slides Prepared by Jason Weiss Slide 2 of 32
Prescriptive Specifications
• Some people love their prescriptive specifications
• They are referred to some as recipe specifications
• Frequently they focus on slump, air and compressive strength
• If this works for you that’s fine
Performance Specifications and Durability Slides Prepared by Jason Weiss Slide 3 of 32
Current Concrete Durability Specifications
• Based on empirical observation
• Based on concrete systems (largely 4 component systems) which are rapidly becoming out dated
• Many times concrete is falling apart
• Concrete is not the dinosaur, our specifications however ……
• Can we provide an option for a performance based alternative
• AASHTO is currently considering changes
Performance Specifications and Durability Slides Prepared by Jason Weiss Slide 4 of 32
Think of AASHTO Approach as a Menu
• You will see many options however the idea is to choose the items that you want
• 6.3 Strength
• 6.4 Shrinkage
• 6.5 Freeze-Thaw/Salt
• 6.6 Transport
• 6.7 ASR
• 6.8 Workability
Performance Specifications and Durability Slides Prepared by Jason Weiss Slide 5 of 32
Lets Start with What is Not There – Pores Entrained/Entrapped Air – BFP, Important for Freeze-Thaw
Capillary Pores (5nm-10 mm) – we can control by water, w/c (Transport)
Gel Pores (2-5 nm) – Part of the structure, important for shrinkage
Air controlled
by air
Capillary controlled
by w/c
Gel is part of the structure
(little we can do)
Performance Specifications and Durability Slides Prepared by Jason Weiss Slide 6 of 32
Transport Tests (e.g., Corrosion) Formation Factor
Performance Specifications and Durability Slides Prepared by Jason Weiss Slide 7 of 32
Resistivity Test Becoming Popular
• Fast (seconds to minutes)
• Low cost ($2-2500 dollars)
• Portable (put it in your pocket)
• However resistivity is not a fundamental measurement and we can do better
Performance Specifications and Durability Slides Prepared by Jason Weiss Slide 8 of 32
Resistivity as a Test, F Factor Spec
• Related to pore volume (f)
• Related to pore connectivity (b)
fb
1
O
F
Performance Specifications and Durability Slides Prepared by Jason Weiss Slide 9 of 32
Capillary Pores and W/C
0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.70 0.80 0.90 1.00
Water-to-Cement Ratio
0
20
40
60
80
100V
olu
me P
rop
ort
ion
s (
%)
Excess Cement Excess Water
Performance Specifications and Durability Slides Prepared by Jason Weiss Slide 10 of 32
Relationship Between RCPT, Formation Factor and Resistivity
• Begin with the equation to convert RCPT (Q) to Formation Factor (F)
Performance Specifications and Durability Slides Prepared by Jason Weiss Slide 11 of 32
Example Corrosion of Reinforcing Steel
Performance Specifications and Durability Slides Prepared by Jason Weiss Slide 12 of 32
Formation Factor – To Service Life
Performance Specifications and Durability Slides Prepared by Jason Weiss Slide 13 of 32
Volume Change and Cracking
Performance Specifications and Durability Slides Prepared by Jason Weiss Slide 14 of 32
Shrinkage and Shrinkage Cracking
• Durability is key
• Transverse cracking in
100,000+ bridges
• 62% of DOT’s consider
cracking as a problem
(NCHRP)
• Cracks shorten service life,
increase maintenance, and
accelerate corrosion
• Increase in HSC
Photo
http://w
ww
.agg
rega
tere
sea
rch.c
om
/caf/
file
/new
deckcra
ckin
g.p
df
Here we see cracks spaced at 2.5 ft
on the approaches to a bridge
Performance Specifications and Durability Slides Prepared by Jason Weiss Slide 15 of 32
• Looking at shrinkage of the components
• Aggregate generally don’t shrink
• Paste is the portion that shrinks
• Shrinkage is a paste property
• SRA/IC different
Shrinkage of Components
Me
as
ure
d S
hri
nk
ag
e Drying Time
Concrete
Aggregate
Paste
Performance Specifications and Durability Slides Prepared by Jason Weiss Slide 16 of 32
Volume of Paste is One Approach – V Paste
• Dutron (1956) shares data
• L’Hermite (1960 no influence of the w/c) (We can shown this is due to PSD)
• Pickett (‘65) and others work on eqn
• SRA, IC change this approach doable)
nAggPasteConcrete V 1
Performance Specifications and Durability Slides Prepared by Jason Weiss Slide 17 of 32
Probability of Cracking
Performance Specifications and Durability Slides Prepared by Jason Weiss Slide 18 of 32
Results Of An Alternative Approach to Consider Variability in Shrinkage
• Plotted the percentage of specimens cracked by a specific age
• Results of 10,000 simulations
• Can quantify risk or total probability
0 14 28 42 56 70
Age of the Specimen (Days)
0
20
40
60
80
100
Sp
ec
imen
s C
rac
ked
(%
)
Age of Cracking
Deterministic
Age of Cracking
5% Probability
PCRACK
Performance Specifications and Durability Slides Prepared by Jason Weiss Slide 19 of 32
Probability Based Shrinkage Specification
200 400 600 800 1000
Shrinkage []
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Pro
ba
bil
ity
of
Cra
ck
ing
[%
]
Base
Fast
Slow
DOR=60%
50%
20%
5%
Grade 2
Grade 3
Grade 1
Grade 4
200 400 600 800 1000
Shrinkage []
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Pro
ba
bil
ity
of
Cra
ck
ing
[%
]
Base
Fast
Slow
DOR=100%
50%
20%
5%
Grade 2
Grade 3
Grade 1
Grade 4
• Shrinkage can be related to cracking potential and this simple approach begins to relate a simple test to performance
Performance Specifications and Durability Slides Prepared by Jason Weiss Slide 20 of 32
Dual Ring Test (Submitted to AASHTO in 12)
Performance Specifications and Durability Slides Prepared by Jason Weiss Slide 21 of 32
Saturation Based Model For Freeze-Thaw Damage
Performance Specifications and Durability Slides Prepared by Jason Weiss Slide 22 of 32
High Saturation Leads to Damage
Performance Specifications and Durability Slides Prepared by Jason Weiss Slide 23 of 32
Neutron Radiography
Detector
Source
Composite System
Cement
Water
I2I0 I1
Aggregate
Vapor
I3 I4
tItI
0 exp
tV
N
i
ii
ItI 1
0 exp
11 hours
10 minutes
Luce
ro e
t al
. 20
15
Performance Specifications and Durability Slides Prepared by Jason Weiss Slide 24 of 32
Sorption Based Freeze-Thaw Model (Neutron Radiography)
Luce
ro e
t al
. 20
15
Performance Specifications and Durability Slides Prepared by Jason Weiss Slide 25 of 32
Sorption Based Freeze-Thaw Model (Neutron Radiography)
Luce
ro e
t al
. 20
15
Performance Specifications and Durability Slides Prepared by Jason Weiss Slide 26 of 32
Saturation Based Model
Todak et al. 2015b
Performance Specifications and Durability Slides Prepared by Jason Weiss Slide 27 of 32
Deterministic Model • Design Mixture
• 6% Air
• 564 lb cement
• Both w/c and air are important
• Here is an example of the interaction
Performance Specifications and Durability Slides Prepared by Jason Weiss Slide 28 of 32
What About Variability • Design Mixture
• 0.42 w/c
• 6% Air
• 564 lb cement
• Fine Aggregate
• Lets Assume Variations
• w/c 5% (0.38 to 0.46)
• Air 15% (4.2 to 7.8)
Performance Specifications and Durability Slides Prepared by Jason Weiss Slide 29 of 32
What About Variability
• Design Mixture • 0.42 w/c
• 6% Air
• 564 lb cement
• Fine Aggregate
• Lets Assume Variations
• w/c 5% (0.38 to 0.46)
• Air 5% (5.4 to 6.6)
• Air 15% (4.2 to 7.8)
• Air 15% (3.0 to 9.0)
Calculated from the ARA PRS Project
Criteria 20% Failure Rate
Performance Specifications and Durability Slides Prepared by Jason Weiss Slide 30 of 32
Model Correlates with Damage
Performance Specifications and Durability Slides Prepared by Jason Weiss Slide 31 of 32
Main Thoughts – Are We Ready ?
• Water to cement ratio (w/c) • Historically – w/c is specified for transport (pore volume and connectivity)
• Performance – The formation factor can measure this directly (formation factor is inversely related to pore volume and connectivity)
• A w/c to resistivity to F Factor
• Air content • Historically – A table was created based on empirical field performance
• Performance – New tests exist, new predictive methods exist for saturation and salt and we can begin to link these together
• Shrinkage methods are ready based on models or tests
Performance Specifications and Durability Slides Prepared by Jason Weiss Slide 32 of 32
Thank you Are There Any Questions
Jason Weiss , Edwards Distinguished Professor
http://cce.oregonstate.edu/deicing-salt
http://cce.oregonstate.edu/internalcuring
http://cce.oregonstate.edu/resistivity