Draft Policy 2012-5 Removal of Renumbering Requirement for Small Multihomers
description
Transcript of Draft Policy 2012-5 Removal of Renumbering Requirement for Small Multihomers
![Page 1: Draft Policy 2012-5 Removal of Renumbering Requirement for Small Multihomers](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022081520/56816587550346895dd83eba/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Draft Policy 2012-5
Removal of Renumbering Requirement for Small Multihomers
![Page 2: Draft Policy 2012-5 Removal of Renumbering Requirement for Small Multihomers](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022081520/56816587550346895dd83eba/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
2012-5 - History1. Origin: ARIN-prop-167 (Apr 2012)2. AC Shepherds: Cathy Aronson, Bill Darte3. Current version: 25 July 20124. Text and assessment online & in Discussion
Guidehttps://www.arin.net/policy/proposals/
2012_5.html
2
![Page 3: Draft Policy 2012-5 Removal of Renumbering Requirement for Small Multihomers](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022081520/56816587550346895dd83eba/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
2012-5 – Summary• This proposal removes existing NRPM policy
4.3.6.3 "Additional Assignments for Small Multihomers". Eliminating this section removes the requirement for small multi-homers to renumber when they come back to ARIN for additional IPv4 address space.
3
![Page 4: Draft Policy 2012-5 Removal of Renumbering Requirement for Small Multihomers](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022081520/56816587550346895dd83eba/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
2012-5 – Status at other RIRs
No similar proposals/discussions.
4
![Page 5: Draft Policy 2012-5 Removal of Renumbering Requirement for Small Multihomers](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022081520/56816587550346895dd83eba/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
2012-5 – Staff AssessmentStaff Comments: Issues/Concerns?• The original intent of NRPM 4.3.6.3 was to conserve
routing table slots. However, statistics have shown that NRPM 4.3.6.3 has rarely been used and that most small multi-homers have not come back to ARIN for additional space.
• Implementation: Resource Impact? – Minimal (3 mos.)– Updated guidelines and staff training
5
![Page 6: Draft Policy 2012-5 Removal of Renumbering Requirement for Small Multihomers](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022081520/56816587550346895dd83eba/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
2012-5 – Legal Assessment• No significant legal issue is posed by this
proposal.
6
![Page 7: Draft Policy 2012-5 Removal of Renumbering Requirement for Small Multihomers](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022081520/56816587550346895dd83eba/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
2012-5 – PPML Discussion• 26 posts by 12 people (5 in favor and 2
against)– “I would argue that since the policy as-is is not
providing any benefit and changing the policy would do no harm and provide benefit, changing policy makes sense.”
– “I would argue there's no reason to change policy for a few orgs when the majority aren't affected by current policy in a negative way. There will always be at least one.”
– “I support this proposal, because the existing requirement treads dangerously close to the dubious grounds of ARIN taking a position on the 'routing utility' of the assignment at hand.”
7
![Page 8: Draft Policy 2012-5 Removal of Renumbering Requirement for Small Multihomers](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022081520/56816587550346895dd83eba/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Draft Policy 2012-5
Removal of Renumbering Requirement for Small Multihomers