DR2 Gallery Show Debrief

City of Houston

Disaster Recovery Round 2 Home Design Gallery Show

February 27, 2014

The following pages are intended to document the ideas and work generated by participants at the Disaster Recovery Round 2 [DR2] Home Design Gallery Show held in Houston, Texas on February 27th, 2014.

To access this and other project related documents, and to find out more information about Disaster Recovery Round 2 visit: dr2homedesign.org

Special Acknowledgement to:City of Houston Housing and Community Development

1

Home Design Gallery ShowOn February 27th and March 4th the design team facilitated two Home Design Gallery Show exhibitions of the preliminary home designs. These exhibitions displayed the results of the collaborative design process with CRA & Outreach Area neighborhood residents, community leaders, and local design architects. The events were held in the Houston Housing Authority’s Neighborhood Resource Center at 815 Crosby from 6:00 PM - 8:30 PM and at 601 Sawyer Street from 10:00 AM - 2:00 PM respectively.

Each Gallery Show was an informal and festive event, designed for participants from all CRA neighborhoods to explore, review, comment and vote on the displayed home designs. This document is a summary of these events and the results of the voting. Interviews, video and the design boards are also available on the project website (dr2homedesign.com).

2

The ballots allowed for a vote of “Love it,” “Like it,” and “Dislike it” for each home design on display. Each design was assigned a letter and a neighborhood (indicated by the color of square) that corresponded with the same letter on the ballot. Participants were asked to vote on all home designs, regardless of which neighborhood they currently live in or which neighborhood the home was designed for. Additional comments were also encouraged.

To track the general consensus throughout each evening, a “tally board” was on display near the entry/exit of the exhibition. Votes of “Love it” and “Like it” were indicated by placing a red or yellow sticker, respectively.

FRONT

BACK

ABCDEFG

DR2 DESIGN GALLERY SHOW

DESIGN PREFERENCE CARDWhat would you like to see in your neighborhood?

ABCDEF

DR2 ParticipantTarget Neighborhood Resident (Non DR2 Participant)Resident of the City of Houston

You are one of the following:

?

G

Over 36 floor plans and 16 home design series to vote on! Please mark you preference for each home design concept board on

display next to its associated alphabet letter on this card

Fifth Ward

Other (Please Specify):

You live in which neighborhood:Independence Heights

Near Northside

OST/South Union

Acres Homes

Sunnyside

DR2 DESIGN GALLERY SHOW

DESIGN PREFERENCE CARDWhat would you like to see in your neighborhood?

DR2 ParticipantTarget Neighborhood Resident (Non DR2 Participant)Resident of the City of Houston

You are one of the following:

Over 36 floor plans and 16 home design series to vote on! Mark your preference for each home design concept board on

display next to its associated alphabet letter on this card

Fifth Ward

Other (Please Specify):

You live in which neighborhood:Independence Heights

Near Northside

OST/South Union

Acres Homes

Sunnyside

?

Love it!

Like it

Don’t like it

Love it!

Like it

Don’t like it

Love it!

Like it

Don’t like it

Love it!

Like it

Don’t like it

Love it!

Like it

Don’t like it

Love it!

Like it

Don’t like it

Love it!

Like it

Don’t like it

Love it!

Like it

Don’t like it

Love it!

Like it

Don’t like it

Love it!

Like it

Don’t like it

Love it!

Like it

Don’t like it

Love it!

Like it

Don’t like it

Love it!

Like it

Don’t like it

Love it!

Like it

Don’t like it

Comments:

Comments:

Voting

Voting Ballot

3

“Love it” and “ Like it” Tally

4

Results are organized on the following pages, first by CRA & Outreach Area (neighborhood), then by each home design in the following order:

CRA & Outreach Areas:Acres HomesIndependence HeightsNear NorthsideFifth WardOST/South UnionSunnyside

Home Designs:A - Gulf Coast Community Design StudioB - m+a architecture studioC - Chung NguyenD - Cedric DouglasE - Taft Architects / MetaLabF - McIntyre + RobinowitzG - McIntyre + RobinowitzH - bcWORKSHOP

Results

I - Logan and JohnsonJ - bcWORKSHOPK - Brett Zamore Design L - Lantz Full CircleM - unabridged ArchitectureN - unabridged ArchitectureO - unabridged ArchitectureP - unabridged Architecture

VOTER PROFILE (162 total participants)

TOTAL # OF DESIGNS WITH GREATER THAN 50% APPROVAL BY CRA & OUTREACH AREA

NEIGHBORHOOD: Independence Heights

Near Northside

Fifth Ward

OST/ South Union

Sunnyside

Acres Homes

11

15

7

16

14

10

Neighborhood DR2 Applicant (45%)

Non-DR2 Applicant (29%)

Other (26%)

6

Acres Homes DR2 Applicants, percent of approval (The total number of “Love it” + “Like it” votes divided by total number of votes):

A

B

C

D

E

F

G

H

I

J

K

L

M

N

O

P

Acres Homes

Comments:

“K, L, + M really grabbed my attention”

“They would all fit well in Acres Homes”

“Must have a garage and be on slab”

“Everything was wonderful but A and B are great, Thank You”

100%

88%

80%

67%

38%

71%

57%

43%

60%

60%

50%

75%

75%

86%

88%

100%

Acres Homes Neighborhood Ranking (by combined total number of “Love it” + “Like it” votes from DR2 applicants and neighborhood residents):

BOARD

L

A

P

B

M

N

O

F

C

D

G

H

E

I

K

J

FIRM

Lantz Full Circle

Gulf Coast Community Design Studio

unabridged Architecture

m+a Architecture Studio




McIntyre and Robinowitz

Chung Nguyen

Cedric Douglas


bcWORKSHOP

Taft Architects + MetaLab

Logan and Johnson

Brett Zamore Design

bcWORKSHOP

VOTES

15

14

14

13

13

12

12

10

8

8

8

7

6

6

6

5

RANK

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

7

Independence Heights

Comments:

“Great job! Thanks for allowing the residents to have input”

“B is organized better”

“I like the design of B”

Independence Heights DR2 Applicants, percent of approval (The total num-ber of “Love it” + “Like it” votes divided by total number of votes):

A

B

C

D

E

F

G

H

I

J

K

L

M

N

O

P

50%

67%

20%

40%

20%

25%

40%

40%

40%

60%

50%

33%

25%

75%

50%

50%

Independence Heights Neighborhood Ranking (by combined total number of “Love it” + “Like it” votes from DR2 applicants and neighborhood residents):

BOARD

O

D

B

P

F

G

J

K

M

A

H

I

L

E

N

C

FIRM


Cedric Douglas





bcWORKSHOP

Brett Zamore Design



bcWORKSHOP

Logan and Johnson

Lantz Full Circle



Chung Nguyen

VOTES

8

7

6

6

5

5

5

5

5

4

4

4

4

3

3

2

RANK

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

8

Near Northside

Comments:

“Would love a carport”

“Would love a porch on the back for bbq gathering”

“Love the open concept on C”

“A and O are my favorite”

“L is the house I love the most”

Near Northside DR2 Applicants, percent of approval (The total number of “Love it” + “Like it” votes divided by total number of votes).

A

B

C

D

E

F

G

H

I

J

K

L

M

N

O

P

53%

44%

60%

63%

80%

73%

73%

57%

57%

86%

86%

79%

88%

93%

100%

87%

Near Northside Neighborhood Ranking (by combined total number of “Love it” + “Like it” votes from DR2 applicants and neighborhood residents).

BOARD

P

L

O

A

F

H

M

G

K

N

J

B

D

C

E

I

FIRM


Lantz Full Circle




bcWORKSHOP



Brett Zamore Design


bcWORKSHOP


Cedric Douglas

Chung Nguyen


Logan and Johnson

VOTES

20

19

19

18

17

17

17

16

16

15

13

12

12

10

10

9

RANK

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

9

Fifth WardFifth Ward DR2 Applicants, percent of approval (The total number of “Love it” + “Like it” votes divided by total number of votes).

A

B

C

D

E

F

G

H

I

J

K

L

M

N

O

P

Comments:

“It is what I would have want my current house to have been”

“E is too high for me being older”

“Just love G, it is very suitable, J is more modern version of current home, very nice options”

“I really like H and J but there is no carport”

67%

57%

86%

43%

14%

33%

43%

38%

14%

57%

71%

67%

57%

71%

100%

100%

Fifth Ward Neighborhood Ranking (by combined total number of “Love it” + “Like it” votes from DR2 applicants and neighborhood residents).

BOARD

O

C

L

P

A

J

B

I

K

M

N

D

G

F

H

E

FIRM


Chung Nguyen

Lantz Full Circle



bcWORKSHOP


Logan and Johnson

Brett Zamore Design



Cedric Douglas



bcWORKSHOP


VOTES

13

12

12

11

10

10

9

8

8

8

8

7

7

6

6

2

RANK

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

10

OST/South UnionOST/South Union DR2 Applicants, percent of approval (The total number of “Love it” + “Like it” votes divided by total number of votes):

A

B

C

D

E

F

G

H

I

J

K

L

M

N

O

P

Comments:

“We would like to recycle as much as possible”

“L, best outside design, security and getting car into home”

“M is a very sleek design and O has a really good layout and func-tion overall”

“Attached carport of K could be garage”

“Don’t like the raised foundation of E”

54%

33%

46%

38%

52%

63%

58%

42%

44%

68%

60%

56%

88%

73%

80%

64%

OST/South Union Neighborhood Ranking (by combined total number of “Love it” + “Like it” votes from DR2 applicants & neighborhood residents):

BOARD

O

L

P

A

M

B

K

H

G

N

F

J

D

I

E

C

FIRM


Lantz Full Circle





Brett Zamore Design

bcWORKSHOP




bcWORKSHOP

Cedric Douglas

Logan and Johnson


Chung Nguyen

VOTES

30

24

24

21

20

18

18

17

16

16

15

14

13

12

11

10

RANK

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

11

SunnysideSunnyside DR2 Applicants, percent of approval (The total number of “Love it” + “Like it” votes divided by total number of votes):

A

B

C

D

E

F

G

H

I

J

K

L

M

N

O

P

Comments:

“L, love it, love it, got to have it”

“Love the 2nd elevation of A”

67%

17%

56%

60%

67%

67%

40%

60%

25%

83%

71%

29%

83%

100%

100%

100%

Sunnyside Neighborhood Ranking (by combined total number of “Love it” + “Like it” votes from DR2 applicants and neighborhood residents):

BOARD

L

A

O

K

P

M

B

F

G

D

E

I

H

N

C

J

FIRM

Lantz Full Circle



Brett Zamore Design






Cedric Douglas


Logan and Johnson

bcWORKSHOP


Chung Nguyen

bcWORKSHOP

VOTES

13

12

12

10

10

9

8

8

8

7

6

6

4

4

2

2

RANK

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

12

Acre

s H

omes

OST

/Sou

th U

nion

Sunn

ysid

eAType 2 - 1,330 SF MAX Type 3 - 1,425 SF MAX Type 4 - 1,500 SF MAX

Architect: Gulf Coast Community Design Studio Scheme: 1

ELEVATION OPTIONS FLOORPLAN - 3 BEDROOM

FLOORPLAN - 2 BEDROOM

Type 2 - 2 BR | 2 BA• Front porch entry Type 3 - 3BR | 2 BA• Front porch entry• Garage

Type 4 - 4BD | 2 BA• Front porch entry• Back porch

3D HOME VIEW FLOORPLAN - 4 BEDROOM

40%

90%

77%

66%

68%

93%

100%

Average 74.82%

DR2 Applicants and Neighborhood Residents - Percent approval (The total number of “Love it” + “Like it” votes divided by total votes):

A

I

N

F

O

S

U

A - Acres HomesI - Independence HeightsN - Near NorthsideF - Fifth WardO - OST/South UnionS - SunnysideU - Neighborhood Unspecified


13

Acre

s H

omes

OST

/Sou

th U

nion

Sunn

ysid

e

FLOORPLAN - 2 BEDROOM FLOORPLAN - 4 BEDROOM

BType 2 - 1,330 SF MAX Type 3 - 1,425 SF MAX Type 4 - 1,500 SF MAX

Architect: m+a Architecture Studio- Scheme: 1

BEDROOM 310' X 12'

BEDROOM 210' X 12'

MASTER BEDROOM14' X 16'

KITCHEN10' X 13'

LIVING AND DINING16' X 25'


34'-0"

51'-6

1/2

"

LAUNDRY

FRONT PORCH

BACK PORCH

SIDE PORCH

3D HOME VIEW

BEDROOM 310' X 12'


KITCHEN10' X 13'



34'-0"

62'-2

1/2

"

LAUNDRY

FRONT PORCH

BACK PORCH

SIDE PORCH

BEDROOM 210' X 12'

BEDROOM 410' X 12'

BEDROOM 210' X 12'


KITCHEN10' X 13'



34'-0"

45'-2

1/2

"

LAUNDRY

FRONT PORCH

BACK PORCH

SIDE PORCH


Type 2 - 2BR| 2 BA• Front porch entry• Back porch• Side Porch



75%

60%

64%

56%

36%

81%

67%

Average 57.78%


A

I

N

F

O

S

U


m+aArchitecture Studio

14


A

I

N

F

O

S

U


Nea

r Nor

thsi

deIn

depe

nden

ce H

eigh

tsFi

fth

War

dCType 2 - 1,330 SF MAX Type 3 - 1,425 SF MAX Type 4 -1,500 SF MAX

Architect: Chung NguyenScheme: 1



Type 2 - 2 BR | 2 BA• Front porch entry• Back porch• Carport Type 3 - 3BR | 2 BA• Front porch entry• Back porch• Carport

Type 4 - 4BD | 2 BA• Front porch entry• Back porch • Carport

FLOORPLAN - 2 BEDROOM FLOORPLAN - 4 BEDROOM FLOORPLAN - 4 BEDROOM

18%

50%

86%

33%

43%

73%

17%

Average 44.36%

Chung Nguyen

15


A

I

N

F

O

S

U


Nea

r Nor

thsi

deIn

depe

nden

ce H

eigh

tsFi

fth

War

dDType 2 - 1,330 SF MAX Type 3 - 1,425 SF MAX Type 4 -1,500 SF MAX

Designer: Cedric DouglasScheme: 1

3D HOME VIEW FLOORPLAN OPTIONS

ELEVATION OPTIONS


Type 2 - 2 BR | 2 BA• Front porch entry• Side stoop

Type 3 - 3BR | 2 BA• Front porch entry• Side stoop

Type 4 - 4BD | 2 BA• Front porch entry• Side stoop

64%

63%

50%

43%

44%

67%

47%

Average 51.11%

Cedric Douglas

16


A

I

N

F

O

S

U


Nea

r Nor

thsi

deIn

depe

nden

ce H

eigh

tsFi

fth

War

dA

ELEVATION OPTIONS

EType 2 - 2 BR| 2 BA• Front porch entry• Back porch

Type 3 - 3BR| 2 BA• Front porch entry• Back porch

Type 4 - 4BD| 2 BA• Front porch• Back porch

Type 2 - 1,330 SF MAX Type 3 - 1,425 SF MAX Type 4 -1,500 SF MAX

Architect: Taft Architects/MetaLabScheme: 1

FLOORPLAN- 2 BEDROOM



30%

50%

14%

37%

54%

38%

55%

Average 41.91%


17


A

I

N

F

O

S

U


Nea

r Nor

thsi

deIn

depe

nden

ce H

eigh

tsFi

fth

War

dFType 2 - 1,330 SF MAX Type 3 - 1,425 SF MAX Type 4 -1,500 SF MAX

Architect: McIntyre and RobinowitzScheme: 1

3D HOME VIEW FLOORPLAN- 2 BEDROOM


Type 2 - 2 BR| 2 BA• Front porch entry• Back stoop

Type 3 - 3BR| 2 BA• Front porch entry• Back stoop

Type 4 - 4BD| 2 BA• Front porch• Back stoop


56%

81%

50%

48%

54%

71%

67%

Average 59.70%


18


A

I

N

F

O

S

U


Nea

r Nor

thsi

deIn

depe

nden

ce H

eigh

tsFi

fth

War

dG

3D HOME VIEW FLOORPLAN- 2 BEDROOM


Type 2 - 2 BR| 2 BA• Front porch entry• Back stoop

Type 3 - 3BR| 2 BA• Front porch entry• Back stoop

Type 4 - 4BD| 2 BA• Front porch• Back porch stoop


Architect: McIntyre and RobinowitzScheme: 2

FLOORPLAN- 4 BEDROOMFLOORPLAN- 2 BEDROOM

45%

80%

50%

53%

58%

57%

67%

Average 59.12%


19


A

I

N

F

O

S

U


Nea

r Nor

thsi

deIn

depe

nden

ce H

eigh

tsFi

fth

War

dH




Type 2 - 2 BR| 2 BA• Front porch entry• Back porch

Type 3 - 3BR| 2 BA• Front porch entry• Back porch

Type 4 - 4BD| 2 BA• Front porch• Back porch


Architect: bcWorkshopScheme: 1

36%

77%

40%

58%

50%

40%

Average 55.00%

57%

bcWORKSHOP

20


A

I

N

F

O

S

U


Nea

r Nor

thsi

deIn

depe

nden

ce H

eigh

tsFi

fth

War

dI

3D HOME VIEW

ELEVATION OPTIONS



Architect: Logan and JohnsonScheme: 1

Type 2 BR| 2 BA• Front porch entry• Back entry to carport Type 3 - 3BR| 2 BA• Front porch entry• Back entry to carport

Type 4 - 4BD| 2 BA• Front porch entry• Back entry to carport

FLOORPLAN - 2 BEDROOM FLOORPLAN - 3 BEDROOM FLOORPLAN - 4 BEDROOM

3D HOME VIEW36%

56%

57%

40%

51%

60%

Average 49.61%

55%

Logan and Johnson

21


A

I

N

F

O

S

U


Nea

r Nor

thsi

deIn

depe

nden

ce H

eigh

tsFi

fth

War

dJ




MASTER BEDROOM

DINING ROOM

LIVING ROOM

KITCHEN

BEDROOM

BEDROOM

BEDROOM

BATH

BATH9’-4” X 5’-6”

14’-9” X 12’-0”

UTILITY ROOM

14’-9” X 12’-0”

9’-8” X 6-0”

9’-8” X 6’-0”

9’-8” X 11’-0”

9’-8” X 12’-0”

11’-4” X 11’-5”

11’-8” X 11’-8”

14’-0” X 9’-0”

17’-0” X 14’-0”

FRONT PORCH16’-0” X 12’-0”

MASTER BEDROOM

DINING ROOM

LIVING ROOM

KITCHEN

BEDROOM

BATH

BATH7’-1” X 9’-0”

11’-0” X 11’-10”

6’-4” X 11’-0”

9’-0” X 12’-6”

11’-8” X 11’-8”

11’-0” X 9’-6”

9’-0” X 17’-0”


MASTER BEDROOM

DINING ROOM

LIVING ROOM

KITCHEN

BEDROOM

BATH

BATH9’-5”X 5’-6”

14’-10” X 11’-10”

9’-8”X 6’-4”

11’-4” X 11-4”

11’-8” X 11’-8”

11’-0” X 15’-0”

16’-0”” X 13’-0”

BEDROOM9’-8” X 12’-0”



Architect: bcWORKSHOPScheme: 2

Type 2 BR| 2 BA• Front porch entry• Side entry Type 3 - 3BR| 2 BA• Front porch entry• Side entry

Type 4 - 4BD| 2 BA• Front porch entry• Side entry (2)




50%

65%

67%

45%

49%

50%

25%

Average 51.16%

bcWORKSHOP

22


A

I

N

F

O

S

U


Acre

s H

omes

OST

/Sou

th U

nion

Sunn

ysid

eKType 2 - 1,330 SF MAX Type 3 - 1,425 SF MAX Type 4 - 1,500 SF MAX

Architect: Brett Zamore DesignScheme: 1


3D HOME VIEW

Type 2 - 2 BR | 2 BA • Front porch entry• Back porch• Carport Type 3 - 3BR| 2 BA• Front porch entry• Back porch• Carport

Type 4 - 4BD| 2 BA• Front porch entry• Side porch • Carport

FLOORPLAN - 2 BEDROOM FLOORPLAN - 4 BEDROOMFLOORPLAN - 2 BEDROOM

50%

84%

67%

56%

47%

50%

83%

Average 60.15%

Brett Zamore Design

23


A

I

N

F

O

S

U


Acre

s H

omes

OST

/Sou

th U

nion

Sunn

ysid

eLType 2 - 1,330 SF MAX Type 3 - 1,425 SF MAX Type 4 - 1,500 SF MAX

Architect: Lantz Full Circle/ Enter Architecture Scheme: 1

ELEVATION OPTIONS


3D HOME VIEW

Type 2 BR | 2 BA• Courtyard• Carport Type 3 - 3BR | 2 BA• Courtyard• Carport

Type 4 - 4BD | 2 BA• Courtyard• Carport


44%

90%

86%

77%

61%

100%

100%

Average 78.01%

Lantz Full Circle

24


A

I

N

F

O

S

U


Acre

s H

omes

OST

/Sou

th U

nion

Sunn

ysid

eA

3D HOME VIEW


Type 2 - 1,330 SF MAX Type 3 - 1,425 SF MAX Type 4 - 1,500 SF MAXArchitect: unAbridged ArchitectsScheme: 1M

Type 2 BR | 2 BA• Side porch entry• Carport Type 3 - 3BR | 2 BA• Side porch entry• Carport

Type 4 - 4BD | 2 BA• Side porch entry• Carport


63%

81%

62%

63%

64%

76%

Average 67.86%

69%


25


A

I

N

F

O

S

U



Acre

s H

omes

OST

/Sou

th U

nion

Sunn

ysid

eN

3D HOME VIEW


Acre

s H

omes

OST

/Sou

th U

nion

Sunn

ysid

e

Type 2 - 1,330 SF MAX Type 3 - 1,425 SF MAX Type 4 - 1,500 SF MAXArchitect: unAbridged ArchitectsScheme: 1

Type 2 BR | 2 BA • Front porch entry• Back porch• Carport Type 3 - 3BR | 2 BA• Front porch entry• Back porch• Carport

Type 4 - 4BD | 2 BA• Front porch entry• Back porch• Carport


30%

71%

50%

56%

75%

31%

Average 55.07%

57%

26


A

I

N

F

O

S

U


Acre

s H

omes

OST

/Sou

th U

nion

Sunn

ysid

eO

3D HOME VIEW

ELEVATION OPTIONS



Type 2 BR | 2 BA • Front porch entry• Back porch• Carport Type 3 - 3BR | 2 BA• Front porch entry• Back porch• Carport

Type 4 - 4BD | 2 BA• Front porch entry• Back porch• Carport


Average 88.32%

80%

90%

93%

91%

82%

86%

100%


27


A

I

N

F

O

S

U


Acre

s H

omes

OST

/Sou

th U

nion

Sunn

ysid

eP

3D HOME VIEW FLOORPLAN OPTIONS


ELEVATION OPTIONS


Type 2 BR | 2 BA • Wrap around porch Type 3 - 3BR | 2 BA• Wrap around porch

Type 4 - 4BD | 2 BA• Wrap around porch

60%

91%

79%

73%

51%

93%

83%

Average 73.05%


28

ResourcesCity of Houston Housing & Community Development Departmenthoustontx.gov/housing

Project Standards and GuidelinesDisaster Recovery - Round 2 Market Analysis / Area Selectionhoustontx.gov/housing/pdf/DR2_Planning_Study.pdf

Disaster Recovery Program Ike and Dolly Round 2 Minimum Design Standardshoustontx.gov/housing/pdf/DR2_Planning_Study.pdf

The Housing Design Standards glo.texas.gov/GLO/_documents/disasterrecovery/housing/subrecipients/design-standards-combined.pdf

The Housing Design Specificationsglo.texas.gov/GLO/_documents/disasterrecovery/housing/subrecipients/housing-construction-specs.pdf

The GLO Construction Manual glo.texas.gov/GLO/_documents/disaster-recovery/housingconstructionmanual.pdf

The Hurricane Ike Round 2 Guidelines glo.texas.gov/GLO/_documents/disasterrecovery/housing/subrecipients/ike-round2-housing-program-guidelines.pdf

DR2 Home Design Website DR2 Design Guidebook, Community Workshop Debrief, Community Focus Group Debrief, and Home Design Gallery Show Boardsdr2homedesign.org

DR2 Gallery Show Debrief

Documents

Transcript of DR2 Gallery Show Debrief