DR2 Aerodynamic PDR II Aerodynamic Preliminary Design Review II “The 20 Hour Marathon” October...

32
DR2 Aerodynamic PDR II Aerodynamic Preliminary Design Review II “The 20 Hour Marathon” October 19, 2000 Presented By: Loren Garrison Team DR2 Chris Curtis Chris Peters Jeff Rodrian Mark Blanton

Transcript of DR2 Aerodynamic PDR II Aerodynamic Preliminary Design Review II “The 20 Hour Marathon” October...

Page 1: DR2 Aerodynamic PDR II Aerodynamic Preliminary Design Review II “The 20 Hour Marathon” October 19, 2000 Presented By: Loren Garrison Team DR2 Chris Curtis.

DR2Aerodynamic PDR IIAerodynamic Preliminary Design Review II

“The 20 Hour Marathon”

October 19, 2000

Presented By: Loren Garrison

Team DR2Chris CurtisChris PetersJeff Rodrian

Mark Blanton

Page 2: DR2 Aerodynamic PDR II Aerodynamic Preliminary Design Review II “The 20 Hour Marathon” October 19, 2000 Presented By: Loren Garrison Team DR2 Chris Curtis.

DR2Aerodynamics PDR II• Presentation Outline

• Updated Aircraft Geometry

• Comparison of 3-D Lift and Drag Coefficients

• 3-D Lift, Drag, and Moment Coefficients with elevator deflection effects

• Maximum Endurance Flight Conditions

• Cmarc Developments

Page 3: DR2 Aerodynamic PDR II Aerodynamic Preliminary Design Review II “The 20 Hour Marathon” October 19, 2000 Presented By: Loren Garrison Team DR2 Chris Curtis.

DR2Aerodynamics PDR II

• Wing Geometry- Airfoil: S 1210

- Taper Ratio: 1.0

- Dihedral Angle: 0 (deg)

- Sweep Angle: 0 (deg)

- Aspect Ratio: 8

- Span: 7.71 (ft)

- Root Chord: 0.96 (ft)

- Tip Chord: 0.96 (ft)

- Planform Area: 14.9 (ft2)

- Wetted Area: 29.7 (ft2)

Page 4: DR2 Aerodynamic PDR II Aerodynamic Preliminary Design Review II “The 20 Hour Marathon” October 19, 2000 Presented By: Loren Garrison Team DR2 Chris Curtis.

DR2Aerodynamics PDR II

• Horizontal Tail Geometry- Airfoil: NACA 0006

- Taper Ratio: 0.75

- Dihedral Angle: 0 (deg)

- Sweep Angle: 4.0 (deg)

- Aspect Ratio: 4

- Span: 2.88 (ft)

- Root Chord: 0.82 (ft)

- Tip Chord: 0.62 (ft)

- Planform Area: 2.07 (ft2)

- Wetted Area: 4.22 (ft2)

Page 5: DR2 Aerodynamic PDR II Aerodynamic Preliminary Design Review II “The 20 Hour Marathon” October 19, 2000 Presented By: Loren Garrison Team DR2 Chris Curtis.

DR2Aerodynamics PDR II

• Vertical Tail Geometry- Airfoil: NACA 0006

- Taper Ratio: 0.6

- Dihedral Angle: 0 (deg)

- Sweep Angle: 5.60 (deg)

- Aspect Ratio: 2.5

- Span: 1.81 (ft)

- Root Chord: 0.91 (ft)

- Tip Chord: 0.54 (ft)

- Planform Area: 1.31 (ft2)

- Wetted Area: 2.68 (ft2)

Page 6: DR2 Aerodynamic PDR II Aerodynamic Preliminary Design Review II “The 20 Hour Marathon” October 19, 2000 Presented By: Loren Garrison Team DR2 Chris Curtis.

DR2Aerodynamic PDR II

Page 7: DR2 Aerodynamic PDR II Aerodynamic Preliminary Design Review II “The 20 Hour Marathon” October 19, 2000 Presented By: Loren Garrison Team DR2 Chris Curtis.

DR2Aerodynamics PDR II

• 3-D Lift Curve (Roskam Method)

19.1

4/ )(cos44.4

1

chA

LwfL

htLLL

LLoL

KKKd

d

CKC

d

d

S

SCCC

CCC

wwf

hwf

Page 8: DR2 Aerodynamic PDR II Aerodynamic Preliminary Design Review II “The 20 Hour Marathon” October 19, 2000 Presented By: Loren Garrison Team DR2 Chris Curtis.

DR2Aerodynamics PDR II

• 3-D Lift Curve (Roskam Method)

)3/1(

7.1A

2

1

3107

1

)1(

11

bl

bh

K

K

ARARK

h

h

h

Page 9: DR2 Aerodynamic PDR II Aerodynamic Preliminary Design Review II “The 20 Hour Marathon” October 19, 2000 Presented By: Loren Garrison Team DR2 Chris Curtis.

DR2Aerodynamics PDR II

• 3-D Lift Curve (Roskam Method)

wLzllwLo

l

lwL

CiiC

eARC

CC

))(5.0(

3.571

Page 10: DR2 Aerodynamic PDR II Aerodynamic Preliminary Design Review II “The 20 Hour Marathon” October 19, 2000 Presented By: Loren Garrison Team DR2 Chris Curtis.

DR2Aerodynamics PDR II

• 3-D Lift Curve Slope (Warner Method)

wLzllwLo

l

L

LLoL

CiiC

ARn

C

C

CCC

))(5.0(

21

1

*

,where n=1+for bu=bl

Page 11: DR2 Aerodynamic PDR II Aerodynamic Preliminary Design Review II “The 20 Hour Marathon” October 19, 2000 Presented By: Loren Garrison Team DR2 Chris Curtis.

DR2Aerodynamics PDR II• 3-D Lift Curve (Warner Method)

and are determined from a curve fit to the data in Warner, Aircraft Design: Performance

9984.02979.5759.23595.62112.63

208.0226.00072.0

234

2

b

G

b

G

b

G

b

G

c

G

c

G

Page 12: DR2 Aerodynamic PDR II Aerodynamic Preliminary Design Review II “The 20 Hour Marathon” October 19, 2000 Presented By: Loren Garrison Team DR2 Chris Curtis.

DR2Aerodynamics PDR II

• 3-D Drag Polar

2

2

LDoD

LDoD

CAR

nCC

eAR

CCC

(Roskam)

(Warner)

Page 13: DR2 Aerodynamic PDR II Aerodynamic Preliminary Design Review II “The 20 Hour Marathon” October 19, 2000 Presented By: Loren Garrison Team DR2 Chris Curtis.

DR2Aerodynamics PDR II• 3-D Lift Curve for the Aircraft using the Roskam and Warner Methods

Page 14: DR2 Aerodynamic PDR II Aerodynamic Preliminary Design Review II “The 20 Hour Marathon” October 19, 2000 Presented By: Loren Garrison Team DR2 Chris Curtis.

DR2Aerodynamics PDR II• 3-D Drag Polar for the Aircraft using the Roskam and Warner Methods

Page 15: DR2 Aerodynamic PDR II Aerodynamic Preliminary Design Review II “The 20 Hour Marathon” October 19, 2000 Presented By: Loren Garrison Team DR2 Chris Curtis.

DR2Aerodynamics PDR II• 3-D L/D for the Aircraft using the Roskam and Warner Methods

Page 16: DR2 Aerodynamic PDR II Aerodynamic Preliminary Design Review II “The 20 Hour Marathon” October 19, 2000 Presented By: Loren Garrison Team DR2 Chris Curtis.

DR2Aerodynamics PDR II• 3-D Endurance Parameter for the Aircraft using the Roskam and Warner Methods

Page 17: DR2 Aerodynamic PDR II Aerodynamic Preliminary Design Review II “The 20 Hour Marathon” October 19, 2000 Presented By: Loren Garrison Team DR2 Chris Curtis.

DR2Aerodynamics PDR II• 3-D Lift Curve with Elevator Deflections

eCCCC eLLLoL **

• 3-D Lift Curve Slope (Warner Method)

21

1

ARn

Cl

CL ,where n=1+

Page 18: DR2 Aerodynamic PDR II Aerodynamic Preliminary Design Review II “The 20 Hour Marathon” October 19, 2000 Presented By: Loren Garrison Team DR2 Chris Curtis.

DR2Aerodynamics PDR II• 3-D Lift Curve Slope (Warner Method)

9984.02979.5759.23595.62112.63

208.0226.00072.0

234

2

b

G

b

G

b

G

b

G

c

G

c

G

and are determined from a curve fit to the data in Warner, Aircraft Design: Performance

Page 19: DR2 Aerodynamic PDR II Aerodynamic Preliminary Design Review II “The 20 Hour Marathon” October 19, 2000 Presented By: Loren Garrison Team DR2 Chris Curtis.

DR2Aerodynamics PDR II• 3-D Lift Curve with Elevator Deflections

ew

hthLhL

LLh

S

SCC

eE

eE

eE

CC

e

e

)1(221cos

1

Page 20: DR2 Aerodynamic PDR II Aerodynamic Preliminary Design Review II “The 20 Hour Marathon” October 19, 2000 Presented By: Loren Garrison Team DR2 Chris Curtis.

DR2Aerodynamics PDR II• 3-D Moment Coefficient with Elevator Deflections

eCCCCemmmom

**

25.0725.0

31

180

20

1

1

)(

hnp

wLoo

Lhw

hthLw

Lhw

ht

w

acwLw

np

ohLhLohww

hthLo

w

npmh

ww

hthtmwmo

lx

c

ARC

dd

CSS

C

dd

CSS

cxC

x

iCCSc

SlC

c

xC

Sc

ScCC

Page 21: DR2 Aerodynamic PDR II Aerodynamic Preliminary Design Review II “The 20 Hour Marathon” October 19, 2000 Presented By: Loren Garrison Team DR2 Chris Curtis.

DR2Aerodynamics PDR II• 3-D Moment Coefficient with Elevator Deflections

w

cgachL

w

hth

w

acwcgwLm

npwcg

Lhww

hthmh

ww

hthtm

eeehL

mh

c

xx

d

dC

S

S

c

xxCC

xcsmx

CSc

SlC

cS

cSC

EEEC

C

eee

e

1)(

*

)1()1(

Page 22: DR2 Aerodynamic PDR II Aerodynamic Preliminary Design Review II “The 20 Hour Marathon” October 19, 2000 Presented By: Loren Garrison Team DR2 Chris Curtis.

DR2Aerodynamics PDR II

• 3-D Drag Polar with Elevator Deflections

2LDoD C

AR

nCC

Page 23: DR2 Aerodynamic PDR II Aerodynamic Preliminary Design Review II “The 20 Hour Marathon” October 19, 2000 Presented By: Loren Garrison Team DR2 Chris Curtis.

DR2Aerodynamics PDR II• 3-D Coefficient Summary

CLo = 0.5095

CL= 3.4566 rad-1

CLe = 0.3218 rad-1

Cmo = 0.5907

Cm = -0.5623 rad-1

Cme = -1.2253 rad-1

CDo = 0.0175

Page 24: DR2 Aerodynamic PDR II Aerodynamic Preliminary Design Review II “The 20 Hour Marathon” October 19, 2000 Presented By: Loren Garrison Team DR2 Chris Curtis.

DR2Aerodynamics PDR II• 3-D Lift Curve with Elevator Deflections

Page 25: DR2 Aerodynamic PDR II Aerodynamic Preliminary Design Review II “The 20 Hour Marathon” October 19, 2000 Presented By: Loren Garrison Team DR2 Chris Curtis.

DR2Aerodynamics PDR II• 3-D Moment Coefficient with Elevator Deflections

Page 26: DR2 Aerodynamic PDR II Aerodynamic Preliminary Design Review II “The 20 Hour Marathon” October 19, 2000 Presented By: Loren Garrison Team DR2 Chris Curtis.

DR2Aerodynamics PDR II• 3-D Drag Polar with Elevator Deflections

Page 27: DR2 Aerodynamic PDR II Aerodynamic Preliminary Design Review II “The 20 Hour Marathon” October 19, 2000 Presented By: Loren Garrison Team DR2 Chris Curtis.

DR2Aerodynamics PDR II• 3-D L/D with Elevator Deflections

Page 28: DR2 Aerodynamic PDR II Aerodynamic Preliminary Design Review II “The 20 Hour Marathon” October 19, 2000 Presented By: Loren Garrison Team DR2 Chris Curtis.

DR2Aerodynamics PDR II• 3-D Maximum L/D

Page 29: DR2 Aerodynamic PDR II Aerodynamic Preliminary Design Review II “The 20 Hour Marathon” October 19, 2000 Presented By: Loren Garrison Team DR2 Chris Curtis.

DR2Aerodynamics PDR II• 3-D Endurance Parameter

Page 30: DR2 Aerodynamic PDR II Aerodynamic Preliminary Design Review II “The 20 Hour Marathon” October 19, 2000 Presented By: Loren Garrison Team DR2 Chris Curtis.

DR2Aerodynamics PDR II

• Flight Conditions for Maximum Endurance

Vloiter = 23.9 ft/s

Angle of Attack = 6.61 deg

CL = 0.91

CD = 0.0701

• Maximum L/D

L/Dmax = 15.0

Page 31: DR2 Aerodynamic PDR II Aerodynamic Preliminary Design Review II “The 20 Hour Marathon” October 19, 2000 Presented By: Loren Garrison Team DR2 Chris Curtis.

DR2Aerodynamics PDR II

Page 32: DR2 Aerodynamic PDR II Aerodynamic Preliminary Design Review II “The 20 Hour Marathon” October 19, 2000 Presented By: Loren Garrison Team DR2 Chris Curtis.

DR2Aerodynamics PDR II• Future Tasks

• Extract CL and CD values from the Cmarc model to compare to the theory

• Run the Cmarc stability test to determine the aerodynamic derivatives and

compare to the theory

• Evaluate the Trim ability, Stability, and Controllability considerations