Doc.: IEEE 802.15-09-0635-00-0007 Submission September 2009 Roberts [Intel], Xu [UCR]Slide 1...
-
Upload
quentin-banks -
Category
Documents
-
view
214 -
download
0
Transcript of Doc.: IEEE 802.15-09-0635-00-0007 Submission September 2009 Roberts [Intel], Xu [UCR]Slide 1...
September 2009
Roberts [Intel], Xu [UCR]Slide 1
doc.: IEEE 802.15-09-0635-00-0007
Submission
Project: IEEE P802.15 Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs)Project: IEEE P802.15 Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs)
Submission Title: Update on VLC Link Budget WorkDate Submitted: September 2009Source: Rick Roberts [Intel], Zhengyuan Xu [University of California, Riverside]Address Voice: 503-712-5012, E-Mail: [email protected], [email protected]
Re:
Abstract: Update on the VLC link budget work. The one remaining issue is the calculation of the noise density.
Purpose:
Notice: This document has been prepared to assist the IEEE P802.15. It is offered as a basis for discussion and is not binding on the contributing individual(s) or organization(s). The material in this document is subject to change in form and content after further study. The contributor(s) reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein.Release: The contributor acknowledges and accepts that this contribution becomes the property of IEEE and may be made publicly available by P802.15.
September 2009
Roberts [Intel], Xu [UCR]Slide 2
doc.: IEEE 802.15-09-0635-00-0007
Submission
VLC Link Budget
September 2009
Roberts [Intel], Xu [UCR]Slide 3
doc.: IEEE 802.15-09-0635-00-0007
Submission
Outline
• Relation between radiometric and photometric parameters
• Ascertaining the LED parameters of interest• Path loss due to light propagation• Received optical and electrical power• Receiver noise density• An example based on vendor data
September 2009
Roberts [Intel], Xu [UCR]Slide 4
doc.: IEEE 802.15-09-0635-00-0007
Submission
Radiometric (Physical) vs. Photometric (Visual)
September 2009
Roberts [Intel], Xu [UCR]Slide 5
doc.: IEEE 802.15-09-0635-00-0007
Submission
LED DetectorDiode
Eyeball
A white LED spews optical power across a range of wavelengths (mW/Hz)
The human eye and the detector diode have different frequency responses and hence perceive the same LED source differently.
September 2009
Roberts [Intel], Xu [UCR]Slide 6
doc.: IEEE 802.15-09-0635-00-0007
Submission
For data link budgets we want to use Radiometric units
For illumination applications we want to use Photometric units (which include the frequency response of the human eye)
LED vendors generally only provide Photometric data since illumination is the market today and the use of LEDs for data is an obscure usage.
Radiometric (Physical)
Photometric (Visual)
Total Flux Watts (W) lumens (lm)
Flux Density W/cm2 lm/cm2
Source Intensity W/sr candela = lm/sr
Illuminance Lux (lx) = lm/m2
Irradiance W/m2
Units
September 2009
Roberts [Intel], Xu [UCR]Slide 7
doc.: IEEE 802.15-09-0635-00-0007
Submission
Ascertaining the LED parameters of interest
On the following pages, equation (2.2.1) and Figure 2.1.1 are from the book Introduction to Solid-State Lighting by A. Zukauskas, et.al. The equation relates the power spectral distribution S() (W/nm) to luminous flux v (lm).
September 2009
Roberts [Intel], Xu [UCR]Slide 8
doc.: IEEE 802.15-09-0635-00-0007
Submission
V() is the relative luminous efficiency function defined by CIE and given in the table (from internet) and curve (from the book Fig 2.1.1)
780
380
683 ( ) ( )nm
t t
nm
F S V d The LED total luminous flux Ft (lumens) is given as (2.2.1)
Sometimes it is convenient to use a Gaussian curve fitting for V() (from internet)
2285.4( 0.559)( ) 1.019 : inV e m ,
Find transmitted power and spectral density
Fig 2.1.1
September 2009
Roberts [Intel], Xu [UCR]Slide 9
doc.: IEEE 802.15-09-0635-00-0007
Submission
'( ) ( )t t tS c S
Typically we only know a normalized spectral curve St’() instead of St() in (2.2.1). Denote their relation as St()=ct St’() with an unknown scaling factor ct that can be found from
780'
380
683 ( ) ( )
tt nm
t
nm
Fc
S V d
Warm WhiteNeutral WhiteCool White
780'
380
683 ( ) ( )nm
t t t
nm
F c S V d
Remark: The above step to find St() can be skipped if St() can be either measured using a spectrometer or supplied by the LED vendor.
780
380
( )nm
t t
nm
P S d H
L
September 2009
Roberts [Intel], Xu [UCR]Slide 10
doc.: IEEE 802.15-09-0635-00-0007
Submission
A normalized spatial luminous intensity distribution gt() is provided by a vendor. We need to find the axial intensity I0 that is defined as the luminous intensity (candelas) on the axis of the source (zero solid angle). Since the luminous flux Ft is also a spatial integral of spatial luminous intensity in addition to spectral integral we used before, we have the following relation
max max
0 0
0 0
* ( ) 2 ( )sint t tF I g d I g d
max0
0
2 ( )sin
t
t
FI
g d
where max and max are the source beam solid angle and maximum half angle respectively and max=2(1-cosmax).
normalized spatial luminous intensity distribution
Find transmitter luminous spatial intensity distribution I0 gt()
Note: if the axial intensity is provided by the vendor then one only need convert the intensity from candelas to watts/sr.
September 2009
Roberts [Intel], Xu [UCR]Slide 11
doc.: IEEE 802.15-09-0635-00-0007
Submission
Path loss due to line-of-sight (LOS) light propagation
September 2009
Roberts [Intel], Xu [UCR]Slide 12
doc.: IEEE 802.15-09-0635-00-0007
Submission
α
β
θmax
Transmitter
LOS Link Model
The receiver distance to the source is D The receiver aperture radius is r and receiver area is Ar
The angle between receiver normal and source-receiver line is The angle between source beam axis and source-receiver line (viewing angle) is The solid angle of the receiver seen by the source is r
September 2009
Roberts [Intel], Xu [UCR]Slide 13
doc.: IEEE 802.15-09-0635-00-0007
Submission
The luminous angular intensity of the source at the receiver direction is I0gt(), and therefore the receiver ingested luminous flux Fr=I0gt()r.
The luminous path loss can be represented as
where r is the receiver solid angle which satisfies Arcos()D2r .
max max max
0
20
0 0 0
( ) ( ) ( ) cos
2 ( )sin 2 ( )sin 2 ( )sin
t r t r t rrL
tt t t
I g g g AFL
FI g d g d D g d
Power path loss Lp can be proven equal to luminous path loss LL as follows:
Optical power can be written as
In LOS free space propagation, path loss is assumed independent of wavelength. Power path loss can be represented as Lp=S2()/S1()=P2/P1.
Luminous flux is related to S() as , which is linear with S()
Therefore, LL=F2/F1=Lp.
( )H
L
P S d
683 / ( ) ( )H
L
F lm W S V d
September 2009
Roberts [Intel], Xu [UCR]Slide 14
doc.: IEEE 802.15-09-0635-00-0007
Submission
Now that we have known the optical power loss due to LOS propagation, we can obtain the received optical spectral density from transmitter optical spectral density as
Suppose we use a photodiode detector to receive the signal light. We can obtain the electrical power of the signal as
( ) ( ) ( )r p t L tS L S L S
The detector diode vendors are giving us the info we need
Received optical power , ( ) ( ) rH
rL
r o r fP S R d
Find received optical and electrical power
( )D
qR
hc
21150
,
250
( ) ( ) ( )nm
r e r r D L
nm
P S R R d R
f
where Sr() is the received light power spectral density (W/nm)Rr() is the receiver filter spectral responseRD() is the detector responsivity (A/W at )f
September 2009
Roberts [Intel], Xu [UCR]Slide 15
doc.: IEEE 802.15-09-0635-00-0007
Submission
ideal
typical
Exemplary Optical Filter Response
http://www.newport.com/images/webclickthru-EN/images/2226.gif
September 2009
Roberts [Intel], Xu [UCR]Slide 16
doc.: IEEE 802.15-09-0635-00-0007
Submission
Summary of key steps to obtain received optical power and electrical power
• Calculate transmitter (source) optical power from given luminous flux Ft (lumens) and normalized spectral curve St’()
• Find the transmitter axial intensity I0 from given luminous flux Ft and luminous spatial intensity distribution gt()
• Find receiver ingested luminous flux Fr from receiver solid angle and transmitter luminous spatial intensity distribution I0 gt()
• Find the luminous path loss LL from Ft and Fr
• Prove power path loss Lp is equal to luminous path loss LL from which to find received optical power spectral curve Sr()
• Calculate received optical power and electrical power
September 2009
Roberts [Intel], Xu [UCR]Slide 17
doc.: IEEE 802.15-09-0635-00-0007
Submission
Comment on RX aperture vs. magnification factor
It is the author’s opinion that the RX aperture determines the “brightness” of an observed object and that the field of view determines the magnification factor of an observed object. That is, for a given aperture the magnification factor determines how big an object appears but not how bright an object appears. The observed brightness is solely a function of the aperture size. It should be noted that the field of view, and hence the magnification factor, is a function of the focal distance.
Same aperture lens
Long focal distance
Short focal distance
September 2009
Roberts [Intel], Xu [UCR]Slide 18
doc.: IEEE 802.15-09-0635-00-0007
Submission
Receiver Noise Density
September 2009
Roberts [Intel], Xu [UCR]Slide 19
doc.: IEEE 802.15-09-0635-00-0007
Submission
Determining the noise density NoWhat are the sources that contribute to the noise density?
Photodetector Noise• Transimpedance Amplifier Noise
• Ambient “in-band” noise• Out-of-band cross modulation noise due to photodetector non-linearity
• Others?
Ndiode
Ntransamp
Nambient
NOOB
Signal Of Interest (SOI)
Ambient Noise Floor
Modulation Domain Spectrum
SOI
Out-of-Band (OOB)Interference Signal
Non-linear noisebleed over
ModulationDomainSpectrumAnalyzer
September 2009
Roberts [Intel], Xu [UCR]Slide 20
doc.: IEEE 802.15-09-0635-00-0007
Submission
Ambient “In-Band” Noise Floor
September 2009
Roberts [Intel], Xu [UCR]Slide 21
doc.: IEEE 802.15-09-0635-00-0007
Submission
Cross-modulation of Out-of-Band noise from other VLC signals into the SOI
September 2009
Roberts [Intel], Xu [UCR]Slide 22
doc.: IEEE 802.15-09-0635-00-0007
Submission
CL
R2
2 2 2 ( ) 4shotnpd thermal D S B SHi i i q I I I kT R
q is the electron charge (1.6e-19 coulombs)ID is the dark currentIS is the signal currentIB is the background light induced currentB is the bandwidth (B=1 Hz for N0)k is Boltzmann’s constant (1.38e-23 J/K)T is the Kelvin temperature (~290 K)RSH is the shunt resistance
The detector itself contributes a noise density Ndiode (W/ Hz)
(A/ Hz)
R2C2
September 2009
Roberts [Intel], Xu [UCR]Slide 23
doc.: IEEE 802.15-09-0635-00-0007
Submission
TI OPA111R2=10e6 ohms
Transimpedance Amplifier Noise Analysis
Ref. TI/Burr-Brown Application Bulletin SBOA060“Noise Anaysis of FET Transimpedance Amplifiers”
Assume R3=0
http://focus.ti.com/lit/an/sboa060/sboa060.pdf
September 2009
Roberts [Intel], Xu [UCR]Slide 24
doc.: IEEE 802.15-09-0635-00-0007
Submission
The resistors and capacitors form critical corner frequencies as shown below:
22 2
1
2f
R C 2121 ||||2
1
CCRRfa
TI OPA111
September 2009
Roberts [Intel], Xu [UCR]Slide 25
doc.: IEEE 802.15-09-0635-00-0007
Submission
Typically op-amps have three noise regions … the above noise regions are for the TI OPA111 op-amp. It is anticipated most outdoor VLC implementations will be bandpass systems operating in noise region 3.
Noise Regions for the TI OPA228
September 2009
Roberts [Intel], Xu [UCR]Slide 26
doc.: IEEE 802.15-09-0635-00-0007
Submission
The approximation output noise is given by
niRn NNNN 003
00
2
2
123
30 1
C
CKN n
20 4kTRN R
where
22
222
220 4)(2 RRkTIIIqiRiiN SHBSDnopnpdnopin
September 2009
Roberts [Intel], Xu [UCR]Slide 27
doc.: IEEE 802.15-09-0635-00-0007
Submission
Then electrical SNR is
( ) ( ) ( )rH
rL
sig r f DI S R R d
The signal current is given as
used in numerical example later on
22
22
2
2
123
2
2
04)(241
/)()()(
RRkTIIIqikTRCC
K
RatedLRSR
N
E
SHBSDnop
b
rH
rL
September 2009
Roberts [Intel], Xu [UCR]Slide 28
doc.: IEEE 802.15-09-0635-00-0007
Submission
22
22
2
2
123
2780
380
2
04)(241
/)()()(
RRkTIIIqikTRCC
K
RatedLRSR
N
E
SHBSDnop
nm
nmb
Hz
V
Hz
V 22
Hz
VsV
sA
J
s
sV
A
J
A
VK
K
J 2
Hz
V
A
V
Hz
A 222
Hz
VsVV
sC
CV
A
C
A
VAC
2222
2
2
/
Hz
V
sW
AW
A
V 22
1
1
Eb/No Dimensional Analysis
AVs
JW
sA
J
A
WV
s
CA
sA
J
A
V2
sHz
1
KT
KJk
coulombsCq
/
)(
Hz
V
AV
AV
KK
J 22
September 2009
Roberts [Intel], Xu [UCR]Slide 29
doc.: IEEE 802.15-09-0635-00-0007
Submission
An example based upon vendor data
September 2009
Roberts [Intel], Xu [UCR]Slide 30
doc.: IEEE 802.15-09-0635-00-0007
Submission
Example OSRAM white LED: LUW W5SM-JYKY-4P7R-Z
Used parameters in red box
September 2009
Roberts [Intel], Xu [UCR]Slide 31
doc.: IEEE 802.15-09-0635-00-0007
Submission
Normalized radiant power spectrum density
September 2009
Roberts [Intel], Xu [UCR]Slide 32
doc.: IEEE 802.15-09-0635-00-0007
Submission
Normalized spatial luminous intensity distribution
September 2009
Roberts [Intel], Xu [UCR]Slide 33
doc.: IEEE 802.15-09-0635-00-0007
Submission
Thorlabs High Speed Detector: FDS010 PIN Silicon Diode
September 2009
Roberts [Intel], Xu [UCR]Slide 34
doc.: IEEE 802.15-09-0635-00-0007
Submission
An example responsivity curve (A/W)
FDS-010 http://www.thorlabs.de/Thorcat/0600/0636-S01.pdf
optical filter band430nm ~ 470nm
September 2009
Roberts [Intel], Xu [UCR]Slide 35
doc.: IEEE 802.15-09-0635-00-0007
Submission
Thorlabs filter response
September 2009
Roberts [Intel], Xu [UCR]Slide 36
doc.: IEEE 802.15-09-0635-00-0007
Submission
Slide 36
ParametersTransmitter luminous flux Fs 66lm
Distance between transmitter and receiver D
2m
Angle 0
Angle 0
Receiver diameter 2.54cm
Receiver area 5.07cm2
Optical filter band 430nm~470nm
Optical filter transmittance 0.7
Focusing lens transmittance 0.9
Electrical signal bandwidth 250kHz or 100MHz
Photodiode dark current 2.5nA
Photodiode capacitance 3.2pF
Photodiode spectral responsivity
approximately 0.17 A/W within the band
Photodiode shunt resistance RSH
108Ω
Measured average background light optical power
60μW
Temperature T 300K
Electron charge q 1.6×10-19C
Boltzmann constant k 1.38×10-23
September 2009
Roberts [Intel], Xu [UCR]Slide 37
doc.: IEEE 802.15-09-0635-00-0007
Submission
Low data rate100 kbps
High data rate10 Mbps
Load resistance
Electrical signal power
Signal induced shot noise
Background light induced shot noise
Dark current induced shot noise
Thermal noise
SNR
Path Loss 43.8dB
Calculated received optical power 2.1μW
Measured received optical power 1.2μW
Results
September 2009
Roberts [Intel], Xu [UCR]Slide 38
doc.: IEEE 802.15-09-0635-00-0007
Submission
Companion Xcel Spreadsheet Analysis
September 2009
Roberts [Intel], Xu [UCR]Slide 39
doc.: IEEE 802.15-09-0635-00-0007
Submission
Link BudgetSpreadsheetResults
September 2009
Roberts [Intel], Xu [UCR]Slide 40
doc.: IEEE 802.15-09-0635-00-0007
Submission
Backup Slides
September 2009
Roberts [Intel], Xu [UCR]Slide 41
doc.: IEEE 802.15-09-0635-00-0007
Submission
Flu
x /
ba
nd
wid
th (
W/n
m)
LED Spectrum(white LED)
2
21150
250
)()()( RdLRSPnm
nm
RX
Where T() is the transmitter power spectral density (W/nm) R() is the detector responsivity (A/W at ) L() is the propagation loss (loss at )
The detector diode vendors are giving us the info we need
This is the information we need from the LED vendor
For best performance we want the detector spectral responsivity to be “matched” to the LED spectral density. In general this is hard to due, especially for white LEDs.
September 2009
Roberts [Intel], Xu [UCR]Slide 42
doc.: IEEE 802.15-09-0635-00-0007
Submission
September 2009
Roberts [Intel], Xu [UCR]Slide 43
doc.: IEEE 802.15-09-0635-00-0007
Submission