Doc.: IEEE 802.15-00/180r1 Submission July, 2000 Slide 1James D. Allen, Eastman Kodak Co. Project:...
8
doc.: IEEE 802.15- 00/180r1 Submiss ion July, 2000 Slide 1 James D. Allen, Eastman Kodak Co. Project: IEEE P802.15 Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Project: IEEE P802.15 Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [TG3 Evaluation Process Flow Chart] Date Submitted: [13 July 2000] Source: [James D. Allen] Company [Eastman Kodak Co.] Address [66 Eastman Ave. Rochester, NY 14650-2015] Voice:[(716) 227-6346], FAX: [(716) 722-9053], E-Mail: [james.d [email protected]] Re: [Call for Proposal Evaluation.ref 00110r10P802.15] [Proposal Eval Form.ref 00226r2P802.15] [Pugh Selection Process Clarification.ref 00230r0P802.15] Abstract: [Flow chart of how the criteria will be used to evaluate proposals] Purpose: [This document communicates the results of TG3 discussions on how to evaluate the proposal submissions.] Notice: This document has been prepared to assist the IEEE P802.15. It is offered as a basis for discussion and is not binding on the contributing individual(s) or organization(s). The material in this document is subject to change in form and content after further study. The contributor(s) reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein. Release: The contributor acknowledges and accepts that this
-
Upload
eleanore-cummings -
Category
Documents
-
view
216 -
download
1
Transcript of Doc.: IEEE 802.15-00/180r1 Submission July, 2000 Slide 1James D. Allen, Eastman Kodak Co. Project:...
doc.: IEEE 802.15-00/180r1
Submission
July, 2000
Slide 1 James D. Allen, Eastman Kodak Co.
Project: IEEE P802.15 Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs)Project: IEEE P802.15 Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs)
Submission Title: [TG3 Evaluation Process Flow Chart]Date Submitted: [13 July 2000]Source: [James D. Allen] Company [Eastman Kodak Co.]Address [66 Eastman Ave. Rochester, NY 14650-2015]Voice:[(716) 227-6346], FAX: [(716) 722-9053], E-Mail:[james.d [email protected]]
Re: [Call for Proposal Evaluation.ref 00110r10P802.15] [Proposal Eval Form.ref 00226r2P802.15] [Pugh Selection Process Clarification.ref 00230r0P802.15]
Abstract: [Flow chart of how the criteria will be used to evaluate proposals]
Purpose: [This document communicates the results of TG3 discussions on how to evaluate the proposal submissions.]
Notice: This document has been prepared to assist the IEEE P802.15. It is offered as a basis for discussion and is not binding on the contributing individual(s) or organization(s). The material in this document is subject to change in form and content after further study. The contributor(s) reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein.Release: The contributor acknowledges and accepts that this contribution becomes the property of IEEE and may be made publicly available by P802.15.
doc.: IEEE 802.15-00/180r1
Submission
July, 2000
Slide 2 James D. Allen, Eastman Kodak Co.
Process Flow Chart for
P802.15.3 Proposals
doc.: IEEE 802.15-00/180r1
Submission
July, 2000
Slide 3 James D. Allen, Eastman Kodak Co.
• This process was designed around several concerns expressed by TG participants:
– Allow concepts to merge and optimize,– Need to hear all presentations before vote even if materials
are available in advance (Q/A sessions)– Need to reduce number of options quickly and fairly– Need to use TG3’s joint expertise efficiently– Need to be able to consider new criteria– Need to have a streamlined process compatible with
informed voters, short schedules and conference calls– Need to prevent getting lost in the process rather than
focused on the goal
doc.: IEEE 802.15-00/180r1
Submission
July, 2000
Slide 4 James D. Allen, Eastman Kodak Co.
• Proposal evaluation submission for voters:
– Fill in evaluation “scores” in 00226r2P802-15_TG3-
Proposal-Eval-Form (in the Excel file). Unknowns = “Same”
– Rename the file according to the following convention:
00226r2P802-15_TG3-<last name first initial> (no spaces)
Example: 00226r2P802-15_TG3-evansn
Update - Process details - July meeting
doc.: IEEE 802.15-00/180r1
Submission
– By July 21, midnight EDT, email the file as an
attachment to the following addresses:
– Results will be posted to web and notification will
be sent to List Server.
doc.: IEEE 802.15-00/180r1
Submission
July, 2000
Slide 5 James D. Allen, Eastman Kodak Co.
Secretary: Assigns Document Number if missing Verifies Format and Copyright Release Scans for meeting PAR- do not assign number if doc does not meet intent of the Call Scans for Self Rating Section Verify slot in July calendar Notify Alfvin or Gifford for web matrix Forward presentations to Gifford for posting Remind Submitter of presentation date/time and request any missing data Updates Chair on status [All presentations and support documents are available on or before July 7.]
Evaluation worksheets are passed out @
July Meeting
One Pugh matrix per submission is passed out to each voter before each presentation sessionThis evaluation is for “first order” ranking of submissionsVoters may evaluate a presentation only if they are present for the session (a session my have >1 presentation)Evaluation sheets are handed in at end of each session
(note: Retext has changed)
File Submission to TG3 Secretary, Copy to Chair
Submitter Presentsat July IEEE Meeting
Beginning of July Meeting
doc.: IEEE 802.15-00/180r1
Submission
July, 2000
Slide 6 James D. Allen, Eastman Kodak Co.
Criteria Changesand Con Call Plans
Evaluate any proposals to change CriteriaVote on changes Thursday - has to be during open sessionRequest reassessment of any new criteria proposed by any submittersPublish Con Call discussion schedule (week following July meeting)Vote to enable TG3 to make binding decisions at September interim meeting if quorum exist.
Conference CallAnalysis Cycle
Proposal eval files submitted by July 28, midnight EDTProposals are put in order of rating; results compiled and reported before Aug 1st conference callOrder will determine evaluation order (time to hear, think, discuss is needed prior to a first sort vote)
Conference Call discussions of all proposalsFocus on filling in matrix, asking questions, Evaluation sequence is in order of ranking votePugh “+same-” evaluation will be completedEvaluate Mac and PHY separate- each containing Systems sections and combinations or improvements of proposals to encourage best solution for final proposal - Activated Phy Mac Sys CommitteesNo Mac or PHY exist alone. PHY-only or Mac-only submissions must be paired for final vote in Sept.Evaluate Pugh to combine best MACs and PHY combos.
Rank order all Presentations
Voters rate relative (+,same,-) for each criteria during presentation Voters to convert self rating details to general Pugh ratingsWeighting is applied in Pugh tool to help separate criteria valueReference value for each criteria item used as reference (all proposals rated relative to this) (These values are from P802.15-00/110r10 or above.)
End of July Meeting
doc.: IEEE 802.15-00/180r1
Submission
July, 2000
Slide 7 James D. Allen, Eastman Kodak Co.
Next level of Sort
Reduce to one PHY/Mac
Begin Draft Standard
Review matrix and analysis results and vote on acceptance of work.Vote on which proposals to pursue: 1- Use master evaluation document which is the matrix from doc: 00110r11-P802.15 as the reference. 2- Each voter rates all proposals in order of preference - each proposal is given a number of their order (first choice is 1, etc) 3- Votes are tallied, results are presented and sanity check done informally 4- Top half stays in, bottom half is excused. 5- Top half has the opportunity to discuss differences to clarify 6- Vote is taken again
Establish method for reducing remaining proposals to final drafts for PHY/MAC 1- review criteria and weighting for final selection 2- rate each remaining proposal based on final criteria 3- determine proposal differences and evaluate against PAR, and criteria 4- vote to determine final proposal for PHY/MAC
Create baseline PHY/MAC drafts from results
Beginning Sept. Meeting
![Project: IEEE 802.15 Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [IEEE 802.15 Report at BT Decvon] Date Submitted: [09july00]](https://static.fdocuments.in/doc/165x107/5514b766550346f06e8b6521/project-ieee-80215-working-group-for-wireless-personal-area-networks-wpans-submission-title-ieee-80215-report-at-bt-decvon-date-submitted-09july00.jpg)
