Direct Potable Reuse vs Desalination for Californias Water Supply
-
Upload
occoastkeeper -
Category
Environment
-
view
3.256 -
download
0
Transcript of Direct Potable Reuse vs Desalination for Californias Water Supply
Evaluating DPR and Desalination as Water Supply Options
CalAm’s Monterey Peninsula Project Poseidon – Carlsbad
Purpose: Reduced reliance on the Carmel River Purpose: Profit
Per Capita Water Use: 48.3 GPCD Per Capita Water Use: 160 GPCD
Discharge of Treated Wastewater: 29.6 MGD Discharge of Treated Wastewater: 140-180 MGD
Size: 6.4 MGD or 9.6 MGD Size: 50 MGD (Total 215 MGD) Largest ocean desalination facility in the Western Hemisphere
Environmental Protection: Subsurface intakes w/ treated wastewater to dilute brine discharges
Environmental Protection: Open ocean intake with greater marine life impacts than Encina Power Station. Will use flow augmentation to dilute brine (Flow augmentation is illegal for all other desalination facilities but Carlsbad).
Israel California
Household Water Use: 44 GPCD So. Cal. Household Water Use: 105 GPCD
Reuse of Wastewater: 94% Reuse of Wastewater: 13%
Water for Ag: 1.6 acre-feet per acre of land Water for Ag: 3 acre-feet per acre of land
Ocean Desalination DPR
Cost $1,900 to more than $3,000/AF The lowest cost of $685/AF for ATW
Energy Demand 9.50–14.75 kWh/gal 3.25–3.5 kWh/gal
Carbon Footprint 6.00 kg CO2e/gal 1.80 kg CO2e/gal
Water Supply Opportunity 0.4 Million ACY 1.1 Million ACY
Environmental Impacts Impingement & Entrainment;Indirect GHG EmissionsBrine ToxicitySea Level Rise
Indirect GHG EmissionsPossible Instream Flow Issues
Environmental & Social Benefits Provides a Local SupplyDrought Resilient
Provides a Local SupplyDrought ResilientReduces Wastewater Discharges
Direct Potable Reuse Regulations: • December 31, 2016 - Report to
the Legislature on the feasibility of developing uniform water recycling criteria for direct potable reuse.
• Future DPR Regulations.
Sean Bothwell, [email protected]