Developing and monitoring protocol for the elamination of open defecation…
-
Upload
irc -
Category
Technology
-
view
708 -
download
1
Transcript of Developing and monitoring protocol for the elamination of open defecation…
Developing and Monitoring Protocol for the Elimination of Open Defecation in Sub-Saharan Africa
Ann Thomas, UNICEF ESARO Jane Bevan UNICEF WCAROIRC WASH Symposium, April 2013
Objectives of this presentation:
• Review variation in ODF programming and monitoring frameworks across SSA.
• What is a protocol and why develop one?
• Key considerations
• Best practice from SSA
3/16
Total Sanitation - CLTS
CLTS is the key model for scaling up sanitation in SSA
Results at Scale: the number of people who have achieved ODF status has increased almost exponentially since CLTS was introduced
CATS/CLTS is now recognised as a ‘Headline Corporate Priority’
in UNICEF
0.3
0.70.9
2
3.8
5.3
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
Jul-09 Jan-10 Aug-10 Feb-11 Sep-11 Apr-12 Oct-12
Po
pu
lati
on
-M
illio
ns
ODF Population in WCAR– mid 2012
ODF programming and protocol across SSA
EthiopiaODF Popn 2,042,735
Kenya 2013ODF Popn 950,000
Malawi 2014ODF Popn 450,000
NigeriaODF Population
1,944,144
Newly ODF Population
1 – 100,000
100,001 –500,000
500,001 – 1000000
1,000,000 +
Countries with ODF Protocol
Madagascar 2018ODF Popn 227,507
SomaliaNewly established ODF programming
and protocol
ODF villagehere
Namibia ODF 2017
Zambia 2015ODF Popn 512,300
Zimbabwe 2017
22% practice OD
~40% use unimproved or shared latrines
Over 10 million ODF in SSA
Why ODF Protocol?• “an accepted or established code of procedure”…
usually a national level document
• Validation of the national CLTS strategy as part of the larger sector strategy.
• Harmonizing approaches nationally-streamline processes , agree on key programming principles and philosophy across the sector i.e. subsidies, rewards, recognition, definition, etc.
• Step toward improved sanitation and other outcomes - as part of a broader sector strategy.
• Opportunity to link monitoring to sustainability at various steps.
What is an ODF Protocol?
Definition of ODF
Baseline Triggering Reporting Verification CertificationPost ODF Monitoring
Which indicators will be monitored: Feces in the environment, HWWS, disposal of children’s feces
Which communities, what is the baseline behavior, usage?
What are the key behavior change activities/are they working?
Who reports initial ODF achievement, how and to who?
Who is responsible for verifying the claim and how (paper audit, visit,etc.) ?
Who certifies? Recognition?
Monitoring schedule, indicators of relapse, etc.
Reward orRecognition
Links to SanMark/
enhanced ODF statusFacilitator
quality
Key considerations
15/16
Step Key Questions
1. Defining Open Defecation - Is open defecation simply safe disposal of feces or should it include HWWS and/or more? What about latrine quality and features?
2. Reporting & Verification What roles should community/local leaders/NGOs play (i.e. peer reviews, audits)?What type of delay can be programmed between the steps (i.e. between verification and recognition/celebration of ODF?)
2. Rewards and recognition Providing a monetary award to a community that achieves ODF vs. Recognizing district officials who’s districts are ODF.
4. Post ODF MonitoringSchedule or Links to upgrading/SanMark programming
What kind of ongoing support and monitoring is needed in the community?Who can provide this over the long term?Second tier ODF Status ++
5. Coordination & data At the national and state level, what kind of coordination and information management system is needed?
Ethiopia Somalia Malawi Zambia
Yellow flag:
50 % of HHs use covered latrines
50% Institutional latrines (gender)
Green flag (ODF 1)
100% usage of covered latrines
100% institutional latrine coverage
White flag (ODF 2)
100% latrines in use/hwws facilities
Safe water handling practices.
Communal latrines + hwws
facilities
Water source/s well protected.
Red flag: Relapsed community.
Yellow flag (ODF) No sign o f OD.
All use a latrine (shared ok)
Latrine is well located and covered.
Proper disposal of children’s faeces.
Green flag (Post ODF 1):100% use of latrines.Latrines with HWWS facilities. Schools/Health centres.Safe storage/handling of water.
White (Post ODF 2): San/hygiene committee.Environmental hygiene and sanitation.
ODF 1Every hh uses a latrine with privacy.
No evidence of shit in the bush.
ODF 2Every hh uses a latrine with a cover + hwws facilities.
All institutions have latrines with covers and hwws facilities.
No sign of open defecation.
Each household has/uses a latrine.
The latrines have:
o A superstructure providing privacy
o A smooth floor
o A cover
4. Each household latrine has a hand-washing device with water and soap/ash
Ethiopia CLTSH IndicatorsI. Open Defecation-Free Status
1 No open defecation practice No observed fresh faecesHousehold (HH), institutions and transectwalk
2 Availability of latrinesAvailability of latrines meeting minimum standards1
HH, communal areas institutions and transectwalk
3 Cover for latrine drop-hole Safe cover on latrine holeHH, communal areas and institutions
4 Latrines in useFaeces in pit, visible access, latrine maintained, presence of spider webs HH, communal and
institutions
5Separate blocks or rooms for males and females Separate rooms or clearly marked male/female
facilitiesHH, communal and
institutions
II. Safe Handwashing Practice
1Handwashing facilities (HWF)
attached/adjacent to latrines
Existence and functionality of the facility HH, institutions, communal
2 Availability of water in theHWF Availability of at least 3-5 litter water HH, institutions, communal
3 Handwashing facility in useSplashed water, no algae or spider webs, no duston the handle of the unit HH, institutions, communal
4Availability of soap or soap
substitute within 3 meters of
handwashing facility
Presence near HWF HH, institutions, communal
Kenya Malawi Somalia (Puntland)
Verification and Certification
Third party certification as part of the process of validating ODF claims (although expensive).
Two stages of ODF. Four month delay between verification and certification. Third party verification.
Recognition Celebration. Recognition via signboards, media, etc.
Media attention, certificate billboard.
Post ODF Monitoring
Linked with SanMark activities.
Conducted by HSAs. Linked with SanMark activities.
Requirement for communities to develop a POST ODF Sustainability plan that includes improved latrines, training, leadership etc. Overseen by district officials, linked to cleaning days.
Process Indicators - MadagascarCommunity
testimonials
Testimonies from the
Women
2: At least one female confirms the Open
Defecation eradication
0: The selected female(s) are unable to confirm the
eradication of open defecation
Testimonies from the
Children
2: Children confirm the eradication of Open
Defecation
0: No child is able to confirm the eradication of
open defecation
Testimonies from the
Community’s Leaders
2: Community leaders can confirm the eradication
of open defecation
0: Community Leader(s) cannot confirm the
eradication of open defecation
Quality of Natural
Leader facilitation
(question the Natural
Leaders and review
their evaluation data)
Natural Leader(s) make
regular latrine inspection
visits
3: At least once per week
2: Once every two weeks
1: Once per week
0: Natural Leaders have never visited latrines
Community By-
laws/Sanctions for
OD
By-laws exist deterring Open
Defecation
2: By-laws exist
0: Sanction do not exist
Lessons from country
experiences• Leverage ODF protocol development for outcomes beyond ODF
- hwws, disposal of children’s feces, environment.
• Develop second tier ODF
• Develop one coherent protocol for the national sanitation sector.
• Include both process and
output indicators
• Focus on recognition not
rewards.
Lessons from country experience
• Include deliberate timelags and outcomes beyond ODF.
• Consider the certification and sustaining of ODF as the chief outcome, not initial ODF reporting.
• Consider, include and budget for follow up visits/continued monitoring.