Deterioration Modelling of Structural Members Subjected to Cyclic Loading Using Concentrated Plastic...
-
Upload
openseesdays -
Category
Engineering
-
view
484 -
download
20
description
Transcript of Deterioration Modelling of Structural Members Subjected to Cyclic Loading Using Concentrated Plastic...
Deterioration Modeling of Structural Members Subjected
to Cyclic Loading Using Concentrated Plastic Hinge and
Finite-length Plastic-Hinge Models
Filipe L. A. Ribeiro
André R. Barbosa
Luís C. Neves
(1) UNIC, Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia - Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Portugal
FEUP, Porto, Portugal
July 2014
(1,3)
(1,3)
(2)
(2) School of Civil and Construction Engineering, Oregon State University, Corvallis, U.S.A.
(3) Nottingham Transportation Engineering Centre, University of Nottigham, U.K.
OpenSees Days Portugal 2014
Workshop on Multi-Hazard Analysis of Structures using OpenSees
OpenSees Days Portugal 2014
Workshop on Multi-Hazard Analysis of Structures using OpenSees Scope
Images adapted from: NIST GCR 10-917-5. “NEHRP Seismic Design Technical Brief No. 4”. 2010
OpenSees Days Portugal 2014
Workshop on Multi-Hazard Analysis of Structures using OpenSees Scope
Images adapted from: NIST GCR 10-917-5. “NEHRP Seismic Design Technical Brief No. 4”. 2010
Concentrated plastic hinge (CPH) formulation
Finite-length plastic-hinge (FLPH) formulation
OpenSees Days Portugal 2014
Workshop on Multi-Hazard Analysis of Structures using OpenSees Mod IMK Models
Simulating the behavior of structural members under extreme loading conditions is extremely complex, and can only be accomplished by reproducing, at a section level, the behavior observed experimentally The use of empirically calibrated moment-rotation models that account for strength and stiffness deterioration of structural members is paramount in evaluating the performance of steel structures prone to collapse under seismic loading
The Modified Ibarra-Medina-Krawinkler (ModIMK) models is a complex and general model, which accounts for six different deterioration mechanisms, and for that reason, ideal to demonstrate the applicability of the proposed models and for use in collapse structural analysis.
OpenSees Days Portugal 2014
Workshop on Multi-Hazard Analysis of Structures using OpenSees Mod IMK Models
Images adapted from: Lignos (2008). “Sidesway collapse of deteriorating structural systems under seismic excitations”. PhD Thesis. Stanford University.
The original Ibarra-Medina-Krawinkler (IMK) model is based on a backbone curve that represents the behavior for monotonic loading and defines the limits for cyclic loading and accounts for four main deterioration modes
OpenSees Days Portugal 2014
Workshop on Multi-Hazard Analysis of Structures using OpenSees Mod IMK Models
The Modified Ibarra-Medina-Krawinkler (ModIMK), proposed by Lignos and Krawinkler (2008), differs from the original model on some definitions related to the backbone curve and on the simulation of deterioration.
After the work of Lignos and Krawinkler, that statistically analyzed several hundreds of experimental test results obtained over the last decades, the ModIMK model defines all his parameters, including strength and stiffness deterioration, in terms of element geometry, material properties, and cross-sectional geometry.
Based on the modes of deterioration defined by the ModIMK model, three different models were implemented in OpenSees
OpenSees Days Portugal 2014
Workshop on Multi-Hazard Analysis of Structures using OpenSees Mod IMK Models
Models implemented in OpenSees
(a) Backbone curve (b) Bilin model (c) Peak-Oriented mode (d) Pinching model
Deterioration mechanisms:
Basic strength (b,c,d) Post-yielding ratio (b,c,d) Post-capping strength (b,c,d) Unloading Stiffness (b,c,d) Reloading stiffness (c,d) Pinching(d)
OpenSees Days Portugal 2014
Workshop on Multi-Hazard Analysis of Structures using OpenSees Mod IMK Models
Modeling the rate of deterioration
The rates of cyclic deterioration are controlled by a characteristic total hysteretic energy dissipation capacity Et and an energy based rule developed by Rahnama and Krawinkler (1993) In general, a parameter X, which can represent any of the six deterioration modes (e.g., basic strength) and can include a stiffness parameter or a strength parameter, can be updated through:
yt FE
c
i
j
jt
ii
EE
E
1
iE
11 iii XX
yi F1
OpenSees Days Portugal 2014
Workshop on Multi-Hazard Analysis of Structures using OpenSees FLPH formulation
What is it? FLPH formulation is an efficient distributed plasticity formulation with designated hinge zones at the member ends. Cross sections in the inelastic hinge zones are characterized through either nonlinear moment-curvature relationships or explicit fiber-section integrations that enforce the assumption that plane sections remain plane.
Integration scheme
Scott and Fenves (2006) proposed a Modified Gauss-Radau integration scheme in order to avoid localization issues
OpenSees Days Portugal 2014
Workshop on Multi-Hazard Analysis of Structures using OpenSees FLPH formulation
Advantages
Avoid localization issues (occurs in distributed plasticity elements) When compared to the concentrated plasticity formulation:
Lower modeling effort (less nodes and elements) Lower computational cost Allows for clear separation between member and connection nonlinearity
Disadvantages
Not possible to directly use empirically calibrated moment-rotation relationships (such as the ones provided by ModIMK models) Needs a plastic hinge length to be assigned (empirical or based on moment gradient – afternoon)
OpenSees Days Portugal 2014
Workshop on Multi-Hazard Analysis of Structures using OpenSees FLPH formulation
How to use ModIMK models in FLPH elements? Converting a moment-rotation relationship into moment-curvature:
The moment-curvature relationship can then be assigned to define the nonlinear hinge sections
M
θ
M
χ pMM
p
pMM
L
L
LKK
/
/
yt FE
OpenSees Days Portugal 2014
Workshop on Multi-Hazard Analysis of Structures using OpenSees FLPH formulation
How to use ModIMK models in FLPH elements? However, that is not enough
M
χ
pL pLpLL 2
pe LL
EIK
6
OpenSees Days Portugal 2014
Workshop on Multi-Hazard Analysis of Structures using OpenSees FLPH formulation
How to use ModIMK models in FLPH elements? However, that is not enough
Thinking about the elastic region
Original member FLPH member
pLL
EI6pL
L
EI6EI EI EI EIEI EI EI EI EIEI
OpenSees Days Portugal 2014
Workshop on Multi-Hazard Analysis of Structures using OpenSees FLPH formulation
How to use ModIMK models in FLPH elements? Proposed calibration procedure
Ribeiro, F.L.A.; Barbosa, A.R.; Scott, M.H. and Neves, L.A.C. (2014). “Deterioration Modeling of Steel Moment Resisting Frames Using Finite-Length Plastic Hinge Force-Based Beam-Column Elements. ASCE Journal of Structural Engineering.
OpenSees Days Portugal 2014
Workshop on Multi-Hazard Analysis of Structures using OpenSees FLPH formulation
How to use ModIMK models in FLPH elements? Proposed calibration procedure
If : ppJpI LLL
OpenSees Days Portugal 2014
Workshop on Multi-Hazard Analysis of Structures using OpenSees FLPH formulation
How to use ModIMK models in FLPH elements? Proposed calibration procedure – implementation in OpenSees section Elastic $interiorhingeSection $Es $A_beam [expr $Beta1*$I_beam]; section Elastic $interior $Es $A_beam [expr $Beta2*$I_beam]; set Locations "0 [expr (8.0/3*$Lp_Beam)/$LBeam] [expr (4.0*$Lp_Beam+($LBeam-8*$Lp_Beam)/2*(1-1/sqrt(3)))/$LBeam] [expr (4.0*$Lp_Beam+ ($LBeam-8*$Lp_Beam)/2*(1+1/sqrt(3)))/$LBeam] [expr ($LBeam-8.0/3*$Lp_Beam)/$LBeam] 1.0"; set weights "[expr $Lp_Beam/$LBeam] [expr 3.0*$Lp_Beam/$LBeam] [expr (($LBeam-8.0*$Lp_Beam)/2)/$LBeam] [expr (($LBeam-8.0*$Lp_Beam)/2) /$LBeam] [expr 3.0*$Lp_Beam/$LBeam] [expr $Lp_Beam/$LBeam]"; set secTags “$hingeSection $interiorhingeSection $interior $interior $interiorhingeSection $hingeSection "; set integration "LowOrder 6 $secTags $Locations $weights"; element forceBeamColumn 8 5 6 $BeamTransfTag $integration ;
OpenSees Days Portugal 2014
Workshop on Multi-Hazard Analysis of Structures using OpenSees CPH formulation
What is it?
How to overcome the additional flexibility?
Increase the elastic stiffness of the springs Consequently, change the post-yielding ratios
Change the stiffness of the element interior
Linear elastic element
Rigid-plastic zero-length springs
L
EInK se
6,
)1(1'
,
,
nK
K
se
sT
n
nEIEI
1mod
OpenSees Days Portugal 2014
Workshop on Multi-Hazard Analysis of Structures using OpenSees CPH formulation
Advantages: “Directly” assign moment-rotation relationships to the zero-length springs.
Disadvantages:
The ideal n value is not trivial, as low values lead to erroneous results and high values result in numerical instability.
The use of the parameter n, which modifies the elastic stiffness and the post-yielding ratios does not allow for direct use of expression proposed by Rahnama and Krawinkler (1993) for update of model parameters due to deterioration
11 iii XX
OpenSees Days Portugal 2014
Workshop on Multi-Hazard Analysis of Structures using OpenSees CPH formulation
Problems due to the parameter n
Take the unloading stiffness update (due to deterioration) as an example
Elastic stiffness: Energy dissipated:
Deterioration:
Updated unloading stifffness:
In the case of a CPH formulation: Thus: If n=100:
eK
kNmEs 100
1.001000
100
1
i
j
jt
ii
EE
E
eeiu KKK 9.01
ee KnK
eeiu KnKnK 9.01
eu KK 90
OpenSees Days Portugal 2014
Workshop on Multi-Hazard Analysis of Structures using OpenSees CPH formulation
Problems due to the parameter n
Take the unloading stiffness update (due to deterioration) as an example
-100 -50 0 50 100-1.5
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
1.5
Normalized Rotation /y
Norm
aliz
ed M
om
ent M
/My
Theoretical
CPH
30 35 40 45 50 55
-0.5
0
0.5
1
Normalized Rotation /y
Norm
aliz
ed M
om
ent M
/My
Theoretical
CPH
OpenSees Days Portugal 2014
Workshop on Multi-Hazard Analysis of Structures using OpenSees CPH formulation
Problems due to the parameter n
Take the unloading stiffness update (due to deterioration) as an example
Deterioration parameter should be seen as a post-yielding ratio thus being computed through:
i1
))1(1(1
)1('
i
i
e
u
nK
K
)1(1'
,
,
nK
K
se
sT
OpenSees Days Portugal 2014
Workshop on Multi-Hazard Analysis of Structures using OpenSees CPH formulation
Problems due to the parameter n Deterioration mechanisms:
Basic strength Post-yielding ratio Post-capping strength Unloading Stiffness Reloading stiffness Pinching
OpenSees Days Portugal 2014
Workshop on Multi-Hazard Analysis of Structures using OpenSees CPH formulation
Proposed implementation
Implemented ModIMK models should be prepared to be used with any formulation
Add an additional input parameter n (default value is 0)
Internal amplification of the elastic stiffness Modification of the post-yielding ratios due to parameter n
ee KnK )1(
)1(1'
nK
K
e
T
OpenSees Days Portugal 2014
Workshop on Multi-Hazard Analysis of Structures using OpenSees CPH formulation
Proposed implementation
Unloading stiffness
In case of CPH formulation:
1,, )1( iuiiu KK 0, )1( KK j
i
jiu
0,)1(11
)1(K
nK
j
i
j
j
i
j
iu
OpenSees Days Portugal 2014
Workshop on Multi-Hazard Analysis of Structures using OpenSees CPH formulation
Proposed implementation
Post-yielding stiffness
OpenSees Days Portugal 2014
Workshop on Multi-Hazard Analysis of Structures using OpenSees CPH formulation
Proposed implementation
Reloading stiffness
1)1( iii dd
elasticmemberspring ddd
membermembermemberspring FdFdd )(
OpenSees Days Portugal 2014
Workshop on Multi-Hazard Analysis of Structures using OpenSees CPH formulation
Proposed implementation
Reloading stiffness
OpenSees Days Portugal 2014
Workshop on Multi-Hazard Analysis of Structures using OpenSees Validation Example
ModIMK Bilin Model
OpenSees Days Portugal 2014
Workshop on Multi-Hazard Analysis of Structures using OpenSees Validation Example
ModIMK Peak-Oriented Model
OpenSees Days Portugal 2014
Workshop on Multi-Hazard Analysis of Structures using OpenSees Validation Example
ModIMK Pinching Model
OpenSees Days Portugal 2014
Workshop on Multi-Hazard Analysis of Structures using OpenSees Conclusions
Accurate results can be achieved either by using FLPH models or CPH models, since the proposed algorithm is used if the CPH models are employed
A significant reduction in model complexity is obtained when FLPH models are employed
The implementation procedure for FLPH models is significantly simpler than that required for the CPH models and the use of ad-hoc parameters simulating rigid plastic behavior can be avoided Work under development:
Validate results for different moment gradients
OpenSees Days Portugal 2014
Workshop on Multi-Hazard Analysis of Structures using OpenSees The Big Picture
Framework for robustness assessment of structures subjected to aftershock hazard events
Step 2
Define mainshock hazard
Step 4
Define conditional aftershock hazard
Step 6
Compute Robustness
Step 1
Define performance level
Step 3.1 – Generate mainshock
Step 3.4
Compute pf1
Step 3.2 –
Development of
structural model
Step 3.3 – Damage
evaluation due to
mainshock only
Ste
p 3
– M
ain
sh
ock A
na
lysis
Step 5.3
Compute pf3
Step 5.1 – Generate aftershock
Step 5.2 – Damage evaluation
due to mainshock-aftershock
sequence
Ste
p 5
– A
fte
rsh
ock A
na
lysis
OpenSees Days Portugal 2014
Workshop on Multi-Hazard Analysis of Structures using OpenSees The Big Picture
Building Models: (a) 3-story building LA3, (b) 9-story building LA9, (c) 20-story building LA20 Buildings designed for the SAC Steel Project for Los Angeles, according to pre-Northridge codes
OpenSees Days Portugal 2014
Workshop on Multi-Hazard Analysis of Structures using OpenSees The Big Picture
Building Models:
The models assume rigid diaphragms at each floor and account for geometric
nonlinearities by considering P−Δ leaning columns
Columns are modeled considering a distributed plasticity fiber-section model
an elasto-plastic constitutive law with 3% linear hardening assigned to each fiber
Beams are modeled using finite-length plastic hinge elements together with a
bilinear model with deterioration based on the empirical model proposed by
Lignos & Krawinkler (2011). A plastic hinge length of Lp = L/6 (Scott & Ryan
2013) is assigned, which provides for accurate calibration between moment-rotation
and moment-curvature relation
The proposed models were validated through nonlinear static (pushover) and
nonlinear dynamic time-history analyses against results of past studies (Luco
(2002), FEMA355C (2000))
OpenSees Days Portugal 2014
Workshop on Multi-Hazard Analysis of Structures using OpenSees The Big Picture
A significant correlation between the increase in residual displacements and the
reduction in the aftershock leading to failure
OpenSees Days Portugal 2014
Workshop on Multi-Hazard Analysis of Structures using OpenSees Future work
Compare robustness measures for: Different types of earthquake activity Other Cascading Events:
Mainshock – Fire Mainshock – Column Removal – Aftershock
Building models with different levels of complexity Study different types of structural systems
Correlation structure between mainshock and aftershock intensities
Comparative studies between the robustness measures obtained using artificial mainshock-aftershock sequences and real mainshock-aftershock sequences
OpenSees Days Portugal 2014
Workshop on Multi-Hazard Analysis of Structures using OpenSees Acknowledgements
Thank you
Filipe L. A. Ribeiro
FEUP, Porto, Portugal
July 2014
OpenSees Days Portugal 2014
Workshop on Multi-Hazard Analysis of Structures using OpenSees