Design Fiction: A short slideshow on design, science, fact and fiction

57
Design Fiction Julian Bleecker O’Reilly ETech 2009 San Jose, California March 12, 2009 A short slideshow on design, science, fact and fiction

description

http://cli.gs/DesignFictionEssay An exploration of the entanglements amongst science fiction and science fact, in order to show how they are not distinct, but infinitely knotted together. Why do this? In order to wonder — what are effective ways of designing the future? Design fiction is making things that tell stories. It's like science-fiction in that the stories bring into focus certain matters-of-concern, such as how life is lived, questioning how technology is used and its implications, its ability to speculate about the course of events; all of the unique abilities of science fiction to incite imagination-filling conversations about possible habitable, life-affirming future worlds. A larger discussion of this slidshow overview is available here: http://cli.gs/DesignFictionEssay

Transcript of Design Fiction: A short slideshow on design, science, fact and fiction

Design FictionJulian BleeckerO’Reilly ETech 2009San Jose, CaliforniaMarch 12, 2009 A short slideshow on design,

science, fact and fiction

4 Quotes About The Future

“You never change things by !ghting the existing model. To change something, build a new model that makes the

existing model obsolete”~ R. Buckminster Fuller

“As I’ve said many times, the future is here. It’s just not evenly distributed”~ William Gibson

“Fiction is evolutionarily valuable because it allows low-cost experimentation compared to trying things for real”

~ Dennis Dutton OH on @kevinmarks’ Twitter

“The Future Is Always Over Sold And Under Imagined”~ Chris Luebkeman

Hi.My Name Is Julian Bleecker

This Is My Context..

I Play Here

And I Also Play Here

These Ideas Do Not Represent..

But In Some Near Future, They May..

Here are some thoughts about a productive convergence of design, science, fact and !ction to help think about ways to meaningfully

shape the future, bring about change, make new sorts of habitable

\

A Convergence?

Some Examples And Stories About What I Mean

(The Details And Nuances Are In A Larger Project Available Here - http://cli.gs/DesignFictionEssay)

One. Science, Fact and Fiction Are All Knotted Up, Anyway.

http://cli.gs/p4X92W

2002. Minority Report Interface: http://cli.gs/p4X92WThis is a purposely long clip, because I want to emphasize not the technology and gee-whiz aspects of the “Minority Report Interface”, but that there is a drama that helps move the story forward, setting up an unusual framework that is crucial to understand the rest of the drama. Itʼs not the technology; itʼs the people story that matters and makes things legible to an audience. This is what circulates the concept; not the tech itself.

Blurry lines between the sci-fi props and research prototypes

“e Film”

Right alongside of “Science”

Jeff Hahn at TED 2008

Whole bunch of links to people who claim “minority report interface” research

Blurry boundaries between reality and?? Science fiction. Entanglements and knots help move and circulate the concept of new interaction rituals indexed by Minority Report (the movie). Doesnʼt matter where things start — the legible concept swirls about helping reality become real.

http://cli.gs/bEpXGe

Jeff Hahn at TED 2006: http://cli.gs/bEpXGe

http://cli.gs/s9NNgp

CNN ReportsTranscript: http://cli.gs/s9NNgpVideo: http://cli.gs/TZ4tzG

Even more. CeBIT 2008, more ideas anchored by the Google search of “Minority Report interface”

Two. Stories Matter More Than Features, Specs And Engineering

Realistic dinosaurs as a special-effect, produced to be visually compelling as a “prop” to help tell a story more

compelling than a dowdy documentary.

More entangled science-fiction and science-fact

SGI plays on the production / construction of dinosaurs in this advertisement during Jurassic Park filming

More entangled science-fiction and science-fact

Muddled associations amongst science, film and previous “truths” about dinosaurs.

Wow..

More entangled science-fiction and science-fact

Diegetic Prototype

"..cinematic depictions of future technologies are actually “diegetic prototypes” that demonstrate to large public audiences a technology’s need, benevolence, and viability. I show how diegetic prototypes have a major rhetorical advantage over true prototypes: in the diegesis these technologies exist as “real” objects that function properly and which people actually use."David A. Kirby, “The Future Is Now: Diegetic Prototypes, and the Cinematic Creation of the Future” (pre-pub)

What does this all suggest in terms of how knowledge is created and circulated about speculative activities?

Diegetic Prototype

"..cinematic depictions of future technologies are actually “diegetic prototypes” that demonstrate to large public audiences a technology’s need, benevolence, and viability. I show how diegetic prototypes have a major rhetorical advantage over true prototypes: in the diegesis these technologies exist as “real” objects that function properly and which people actually use."David A. Kirby, “The Future Is Now: Diegetic Prototypes, and the Cinematic Creation of the Future” (pre-pub)

Wow. Stories matter when designing the future. Maybe even more than the “real thing” in terms of their ability to flash-bang the imagination of real people. Ideas are more powerful than a crappy product that aspires to the idea.

Three. Science Fiction Can Do Things Science Fact Cannot.

A hybrid science-fiction / science-fact can do more things.1. better knowledge circulation and idea sharing2. expanding the realm of possible futures3. exploring aspects of technology-as-culture that science-fact by itself is very poorly equipped to do.

How William Shatner Changed The Worldhttp://cli.gs/tUJs1d

How William Shatner Changed The World — http://cli.gs/tUJs1dLooks at the “science behind the science-fiction of Star Trek”

Star Fleet Technical Manual, by Franz Josephhttp://cli.gs/rduvjm

Star Fleet Technical Manual, by Franz Josephhttp://cli.gs/rduvjm

Published: January 11, 1976Copyright © The New York Times

Star Trek Star Fleet Technical Manual becomes a best seller, early-days user-generated content. Elements and illustrations from the Manual make it into the science fiction of Star Trek (films, etc.) Designs and concepts in the Manual are entirely speculative, not actual props found in the show, etc.Best Sellers — Mass Market Paperbacks. 1976. The New York Times, January 11, 1976, BR7. http://cli.gs/E52ZQq.

Franz Josephʼs Star Trek Star Fleet Technical Manual http://cli.gs/rduvjm

COMMUNICATORSTANDARD FIELD EQUIPMENT ITEM

Communicator concept drawn by Franz Joseph, speculating about science fiction ideas in material form. http://cli.gs/rduvjm

Star Trek communicator speculative electronics schematic and parts list!

“Death Star Over San Francisco” by Michael Horn (2008)http://cli.gs/mmBtgN

Michael Horn. 2008. Death Star Over San Francisco. http://cli.gs/mmBtgN.Speculative imagining of a world in which the Star Wars Empire exists in the San Francisco Bay.

“Metalosis Maligna” by Floris Kaayk (2005)http://cli.gs/R3TSSD

Floris Kaayk. 2006. Metalosis Maligna. http://cli.gs/R3TSSD.Speculating on unintended consequences of advanced medical science

Dark Knighthttp://cli.gs/GzHJhW

Christopher Nolan. 2008. The Dark Knight. [http://cli.gs/GzHJhW]Ubiquitous Sensor Prototype, and immediately about the ethical dimensions. The collaboration between a sci-fact proposition and science-fiction allows one to place attention on things that science-fact just has no means to do; just doesnʼt know how to do engineering and ethics at the same time.Not just technically, and with special effects, but with, for example, ethics questions. There is no API for ethics in engineering, nor is it understood particularly well, and rarely taught. Itʼs fluff that lies on the outside, someone elses problem.Sascha Pohfleppʼs considerations of 23 and Me and their rush to market. No time to ask those kinds of questions. Itʼs not a legal thing, itʼs just not part of the epistemology. But, in film production its comes up because it adds drama to the production, which is at the root of the ontology of sci-fi film, which makes it more compelling to think of remarkable ways that sci-fiction and science-fact can collaborate explicitly.

Listening Post (Hansen & Rubin)

Does the same thing Cross-talk and entanglements between the surveillance mode of visualization in Dark Knight and this design/art/science project “Listening Post” by Ben Rubin and Mark Hansen.

http://cli.gs/ZX9R5t

Kubrick engaged many scientists and engineers, including two fellows called Harry Lange and Frederick Ordway. Lange and Ordway happened to arrive in New York City while Clarke and Kubrick were there scriptwriting. They were in town to attend a conference of the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics and to promote a book their space consultancy company had written on extra-terrestrial intelligence. Piers Bizony. 2000. 2001: Filming the Future. http://cli.gs/ZX9R5t

Clarke and Kubrick collaborate along with Douglas Trumbull, NASA, proper engineering consultancies who could speculate with engineering principles on what’s what in the film. I’ll just show UI examples that were marveled by NASA and other aerospace engineers for their precision. This is all happening during the space race. Clarke had concerns about what would happen if man got to the moon before the film was completed.

Graphical User Interfaces..before there were Graphical User Interfaces.

Why Muddle Design, Science, Fact and Fiction

It Is Valuable To Explain.To Imagine.

To Materialize Ideas.To Speculate About A Different Kind Of World.

It Is Useful To Think Of P.K. Dick As A System Administrator

There Are Insights To Be Had When You ReadBruce Sterling As Software Documentation

It Helps To Think Of Science Fiction Props As Conclusions To Today’s Engineering Prototypes

So, what? Why does all of this matter? It all matters because we care about imagining and materializing future habitable worlds. We care so much that effective mechanisms for creating these more habitable worlds is “our” concern. Smart, creative, imaginative ways of linking ideas to their materialization really do matter, because the future matters, and will use whatever means possible to do this, including the simultaneous deployment of science, fact, fiction and design.

Julian Bleeckerhttp://www.nearfuturelaboratory.comjulian at nearfuturelaboratory dot comjulian.bleecker at nokia dot com

Thank You.

http://cli.gs/DesignFictionEssay