Design and Performance of Prototype Telescope for NuTel project
-
Upload
paki-beasley -
Category
Documents
-
view
36 -
download
3
description
Transcript of Design and Performance of Prototype Telescope for NuTel project
Design and Performance of Prototype Telescopefor NuTel project
Yuri VelikzhaninNTUHEP, Taiwan
Outline
Schedule 2002Design of detector/electronicsLuLin testCalibrationResultsConclusionSchedule 2003
Global schedule 2002: design and fabrication a simple
telescope & electronics for measurement a background from mountain
2003: design and fabrication a final telescope & electronics with simple DAQ
2004: construct many telescopes, creating final DAQ (for many telescopes system separated few kilometres from each other)
Note: For start up a design of final telescope & electronics we need a results of background measurement and results of simulation.
Schedule of 2002
May – July: design and fabrication of electronics + creating software + design and making telescope
August – September: debugging full system
October: LuLin observatory test October – December: processing data +
calibration
Note: We decided to make LuLin test at October (before calibration) due the good weather at that time.
Design of detector/electronics Main task of this design – create a simple
equipment for the measurement of background light from a mountain
Design of detector/electronicsOptics
– Commercial Fresnel Lens (NTK-F300, f30cm, size=30cm*30cm, pitch=0.5mm, PMMA UV),
– UV filter (BG3)
Design of detector/electronics Preamplifier parameters:
– Gain: ~ 100 mV/pe– Rising front: ~35 nS– Falling front: exp(t/T), T = RC = 500 nS– Power supply: +/- 5V, 3.8W (240mW/channel)
+-
FromPMT
To Receiver
Design of detector/electronics Receiver parameters:
– Gain: 1 (~100mV/p.e.)– Noise: ~1-2 mV r.m.s.– There is a small problem: noise after
comparator due long falling front
+-
Shaper
ComparatorLVDS
transmitter
To Trigger
From
preamp.
100 nSDelay line
ToADC
Design of detector/electronics Trigger: using our TTM2 module made for
BELLE experiment (in VME + FPGA based) changing firmware code – one week only!
– Use this LVDS-level connector
Design of detector/electronics ADC – use industrial one (Acromag ADC):
– Inputs: differential 32 channels for simultaneous conversion
– Dead time: ~10 S (8 S – from data sheet!)
– Operation clock: 8MHz (there is a jitter 125nS)
– Range: +/- 10V (14 bit, 1.25 mV/bin)– Noise: ~1 mV (from data sheet)
Design of detector/electronics DAQ:
– use VME connected with PC via SBS system– Code: Visual C++, Windows
ADC SBS PCWindows,
Visual C++
ADCdata
On linetrigger
Buffer RAMHarddisc
HistogramsHarddisc
Triggerdata
Trigger
VMEHardware of DAQ
Software of DAQ
Design of detector/electronics DAQ: some print-screens from software
LuLin Test Field of view
E
LuLin test Some pictures from night shifts
Calibration Electronics test with test pulse:
– Sensitivity: ~100mV/3.3*10^6 e (1 photoelectron)
ADC data with optimized timing. A most noise is due jitter in ADC
ADC data with non-optimized timing. Strobe to ADC is delayed on 100 nS from optional timing
Calibration Electronics test with test pulse:
– Cross-talk due electronics: very small
It’s very difficult to observe cross-talk due electronics
But we observed a change in pedestals in some channels ~0.3 mV when a signal on neighboring one is ~1.5 V (0.02% !!! cross-talk)
Calibration Electronics test with pulse to LED + fiber + PMT:
– Cross-talk due PMT: ~1% (from data sheet)
Cross-talk ~ 0.6%
Cross-talk ~ 0.2%
Pedestal Dark current Light Limit (overflow)
Calibration Test using LED pulse 100 nS x 1kHz:
– Typical histogram in case of big photon flux
Calibration Calibration Trigger rates
– There is a limit ~4MHz for Trigger used during LuLin test due “OR of all channels” logic:
Channel AChannel B
A OR B
Results
0°3°
7°
15° S FOV testLooking at Sirius
Field of view – 3 elevation angles: 3°,7°, 15°– 2 conditions: w/o BG3 filter
Results Sirius
• Study:– Effective field of view
– Lens transmittance as function of off-axis angle.
• In the future, – Calibrate the pointing
accuracy
– Monitoring telescope health
Results Background photon flux
0
100000
200000
300000
400000
500000
600000
700000
800000
experiments with and without BG3
phot
on fl
ux (K
) [c
m -2
, s -1
, sr -
1 ]
3deg+BG3 3deg7deg + BG3
7deg
15deg+BG3 15deg
BefireSirius
Sirius
After Sirius
Consistent with some previous measurements, – Sky: ~ 150-180 photons/(m2 ns sr)– mountain: ~15 photons/(m2 ns sr)
Conclusion We made a telescope & electronics for
measurement background photon flux from mountain
A results of our measurement coincide with results from another group with good accuracy. Difference ~ 10-20 % could be easy explained by difference in conditions (attenuation length, difference in reflection from mountain and from a sky due atmosphere and mountain characteristics, different sky etc.)
We will use these results for creating a final electronics & telescope (together with results of simulation)
Plan on 2003 February – March: hardware design April – June: creating first iteration of
electronics + simple firmware + software for calibration/debugging
July: debugging full system August – October: making a second iteration of
electronics (final) + creating a final firmware + simple DAQ for single detector
November: debugging a second iteration of electronics
December: start mass production + start design a final DAQ (multi-detector’s version)
Note: A schedule for telescope design/producing depends of this schedule and of the detector configuration (number of pixels, size), which is strongly depends from funding.