Describing Images Using Attributes

16
Describing Images Using Attributes

description

Describing Images Using Attributes. Describing Images. Farhadi et.al . CVPR 2009. Describing Objects by their Attributes. No examples from these object categories were seen during training. Farhadi et.al . CVPR 2009. Absence of typical attributes. 752 reports 68% are correct. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Describing Images Using Attributes

Page 1: Describing Images Using Attributes

Describing Images Using Attributes

Page 2: Describing Images Using Attributes

Describing Images

Farhadi et.al. CVPR 2009

Page 3: Describing Images Using Attributes

No examples from these object categories were seen during training

Describing Objects by their Attributes

Farhadi et.al. CVPR 2009

Page 4: Describing Images Using Attributes

Absence of typical attributes

752 reports

68% are correct Farhadi et.al. CVPR 2009

Page 5: Describing Images Using Attributes

Presence of atypical attributes

951 reports47% are correct Farhadi et.al. CVPR 2009

Page 6: Describing Images Using Attributes

NormalitySaleh et. al. Object Centric Anomalty Detection by Attribute-Based Reasoning, CVPR13

Page 7: Describing Images Using Attributes

Abnormal Object DatasetSaleh et. al. Object Centric Anomalty Detection by Attribute-Based Reasoning, CVPR13

Page 8: Describing Images Using Attributes

Abnormality Prediction and RankingMethod AUC

One class SVM 0.5980Two class SVM 0.8657Graphical Model 0.8703Our Model with surprise score

0.9105

Less Abnormal High Abnormal

• Based on Abnormality Score, we can classify an object as Normal vs. Abnormal.

• Also, using this score we are able to rank images based on how strange they look like.

Saleh et. al. Object Centric Anomalty Detection by Attribute-Based Reasoning, CVPR13

Page 9: Describing Images Using Attributes

Reasoning about Abnormality via Attributes

Saleh et. al. Object Centric Anomalty Detection by Attribute-Based Reasoning, CVPR13

Page 10: Describing Images Using Attributes

Describing Objects

• Detector input– Strongest category response with good overlap– Strongest part response within each spatial bin

Farhadi et. al, Attribute-Centric Recognition for Cross-Category Generalization, CVPR10

Page 11: Describing Images Using Attributes

Describing Objects

• Learn spatial correlations and co-occurrence

Detector Responses

True Value for Categories and Spatial

Parts

Has PartHas Function

Pose/Viewpoint

Latent “Root”

Learned by EM in training

Farhadi et. al, Attribute-Centric Recognition for Cross-Category Generalization, CVPR10

Page 12: Describing Images Using Attributes

animal

function: can bitefunction: can fly

part: eyepart: footpart: headpart: legpart: mouthpart: tailpart: wing

Pose: objects_front

Animalblc: eaglefunction: can bitefunction: can flyfunction: is predatorfunction: is carnivorouspart: eyepart: footpart: headpart: legpart: mouthpart: wingPose: extended_wingsPose: objects_front

Describing Familiar Objects

Farhadi et. al, Attribute-Centric Recognition for Cross-Category Generalization, CVPR10

Page 13: Describing Images Using Attributes

Using Localized Attributes

Vehicle

Wheel

Animal

Leg

HeadFour-leggedMammal

Can runCan JumpIs HerbivorousFacing right

Moves on roadFacing right

Farhadi et. al, Attribute-Centric Recognition for Cross-Category Generalization, CVPR10

Page 14: Describing Images Using Attributes

Relative (ours):

More natural than insidecity Less natural than highway

More open than street Less open than coast

Has more perspective than highway Has less perspective than insidecity

Binary (existing):

Not natural

Not open

Has perspective

Using Relative Attributes

14Parikh, Grauman, Relative Attributes, ICCV 2011

Page 15: Describing Images Using Attributes

Relative (ours):

More natural than tallbuilding Less natural than forest

More open than tallbuilding Less open than coast

Has more perspective than tallbuilding

Binary (existing):

Not natural

Not open

Has perspective

Using Relative Attributes

15Parikh, Grauman, Relative Attributes, ICCV 2011

Page 16: Describing Images Using Attributes

Relative (ours):

More Young than CliveOwenLess Young than ScarlettJohansson

More BushyEyebrows than ZacEfron Less BushyEyebrows than AlexRodriguez

More RoundFace than CliveOwenLess RoundFace than ZacEfron

Binary (existing):

Not Young

BushyEyebrows

RoundFace

Using Relative Attributes

16

(Viggo)

Parikh, Grauman, Relative Attributes, ICCV 2011