Describing Images Using Attributes. Describing Images Farhadi et.al. CVPR 2009.

16
Describing Images Using Attributes

Transcript of Describing Images Using Attributes. Describing Images Farhadi et.al. CVPR 2009.

Page 1: Describing Images Using Attributes. Describing Images Farhadi et.al. CVPR 2009.

Describing Images Using Attributes

Page 2: Describing Images Using Attributes. Describing Images Farhadi et.al. CVPR 2009.

Describing Images

Farhadi et.al. CVPR 2009

Page 3: Describing Images Using Attributes. Describing Images Farhadi et.al. CVPR 2009.

No examples from these object categories were seen during training

Describing Objects by their Attributes

Farhadi et.al. CVPR 2009

Page 4: Describing Images Using Attributes. Describing Images Farhadi et.al. CVPR 2009.

Absence of typical attributes

752 reports

68% are correct Farhadi et.al. CVPR 2009

Page 5: Describing Images Using Attributes. Describing Images Farhadi et.al. CVPR 2009.

Presence of atypical attributes

951 reports47% are correct Farhadi et.al. CVPR 2009

Page 6: Describing Images Using Attributes. Describing Images Farhadi et.al. CVPR 2009.

NormalitySaleh et. al. Object Centric Anomalty Detection by Attribute-Based Reasoning, CVPR13

Page 7: Describing Images Using Attributes. Describing Images Farhadi et.al. CVPR 2009.

Abnormal Object DatasetSaleh et. al. Object Centric Anomalty Detection by Attribute-Based Reasoning, CVPR13

Page 8: Describing Images Using Attributes. Describing Images Farhadi et.al. CVPR 2009.

Abnormality Prediction and RankingMethod AUC

One class SVM 0.5980

Two class SVM 0.8657

Graphical Model 0.8703

Our Model with surprise score

0.9105

Less Abnormal High Abnormal

• Based on Abnormality Score, we can classify an object as Normal vs. Abnormal.

• Also, using this score we are able to rank images based on how strange they look like.

Saleh et. al. Object Centric Anomalty Detection by Attribute-Based Reasoning, CVPR13

Page 9: Describing Images Using Attributes. Describing Images Farhadi et.al. CVPR 2009.

Reasoning about Abnormality via Attributes

Saleh et. al. Object Centric Anomalty Detection by Attribute-Based Reasoning, CVPR13

Page 10: Describing Images Using Attributes. Describing Images Farhadi et.al. CVPR 2009.

Describing Objects

• Detector input– Strongest category response with good overlap– Strongest part response within each spatial bin

Farhadi et. al, Attribute-Centric Recognition for Cross-Category Generalization, CVPR10

Page 11: Describing Images Using Attributes. Describing Images Farhadi et.al. CVPR 2009.

Describing Objects

• Learn spatial correlations and co-occurrence

Detector Responses

True Value for Categories and Spatial

Parts

Has PartHas Function

Pose/Viewpoint

Latent “Root”

Learned by EM in training

Farhadi et. al, Attribute-Centric Recognition for Cross-Category Generalization, CVPR10

Page 12: Describing Images Using Attributes. Describing Images Farhadi et.al. CVPR 2009.

animal

function: can bitefunction: can fly

part: eyepart: footpart: headpart: legpart: mouthpart: tailpart: wing

Pose: objects_front

Animalblc: eaglefunction: can bitefunction: can flyfunction: is predatorfunction: is carnivorouspart: eyepart: footpart: headpart: legpart: mouthpart: wingPose: extended_wingsPose: objects_front

Describing Familiar Objects

Farhadi et. al, Attribute-Centric Recognition for Cross-Category Generalization, CVPR10

Page 13: Describing Images Using Attributes. Describing Images Farhadi et.al. CVPR 2009.

Using Localized Attributes

Vehicle

Wheel

Animal

Leg

HeadFour-leggedMammal

Can runCan JumpIs HerbivorousFacing right

Moves on roadFacing right

Farhadi et. al, Attribute-Centric Recognition for Cross-Category Generalization, CVPR10

Page 14: Describing Images Using Attributes. Describing Images Farhadi et.al. CVPR 2009.

Relative (ours):

More natural than insidecity Less natural than highway

More open than street Less open than coast

Has more perspective than highway Has less perspective than insidecity

Binary (existing):

Not natural

Not open

Has perspective

Using Relative Attributes

14Parikh, Grauman, Relative Attributes, ICCV 2011

Page 15: Describing Images Using Attributes. Describing Images Farhadi et.al. CVPR 2009.

Relative (ours):

More natural than tallbuilding Less natural than forest

More open than tallbuilding Less open than coast

Has more perspective than tallbuilding

Binary (existing):

Not natural

Not open

Has perspective

Using Relative Attributes

15Parikh, Grauman, Relative Attributes, ICCV 2011

Page 16: Describing Images Using Attributes. Describing Images Farhadi et.al. CVPR 2009.

Relative (ours):

More Young than CliveOwenLess Young than ScarlettJohansson

More BushyEyebrows than ZacEfron Less BushyEyebrows than AlexRodriguez

More RoundFace than CliveOwenLess RoundFace than ZacEfron

Binary (existing):

Not Young

BushyEyebrows

RoundFace

Using Relative Attributes

16

(Viggo)

Parikh, Grauman, Relative Attributes, ICCV 2011