Derivative Disastors

download Derivative Disastors

of 15

Transcript of Derivative Disastors

  • 8/8/2019 Derivative Disastors

    1/15

    PRESENTED BY:

    DEBJYOTI SARKARPARAG C DHAKATE

    RASHMI ROJA SAHU

    SUBHASREE SAHOO

    DERIVATIVES DISASTERS

    (ORANGE COUNTY)

  • 8/8/2019 Derivative Disastors

    2/15

    Introduction

    Joseph Jetts trading for kidder Peaboy lost$350 million.

    Barrings 1995- Nick Leeson responsible for aloss of $1billion in making big bets on thefuture direction of the NIKKEI 225 using

    futures and options.

    Chemical Bank lost $33million due to usage ofa incorrect model to view interest rate caps.

  • 8/8/2019 Derivative Disastors

    3/15

    Daiwa a Japanese bank in New York lost

    $1billion in 1990s.

    Long Term Capital Management- This hedge

    fund lost about $4billion by followingconvergence-arbitrage model,due to

    widening credit spreads from default of

    Russian bonds.

    Orange County- Bob Citrons trading led this

    municipality in California losing $1.6billion

  • 8/8/2019 Derivative Disastors

    4/15

    The loss must not be regarded as loss for the

    Derivative industry rather a small fraction of

    it which can be avoided.

    Derivative is multi trillion dollar industry andhas been outstandingly successful.

  • 8/8/2019 Derivative Disastors

    5/15

    ORANGE COUNTY

    InDecember 1994, Orange County stunned

    the markets by announcing that its

    investment pool had suffered a loss of $1.6billion.

    This loss was the result of unsupervisedinvestment activity of Bob Citron, the County

    Treasurer, who was entrusted with a $7.5

    billion portfolio.

  • 8/8/2019 Derivative Disastors

    6/15

    Citron delivered returns about 2% higherthan the comparable State pool before the

    disaster.

    Citron invested in derivatives securities and

    thereby leveraging the portfolio.

    Repeated public warning came from John

    Moorlach, who ran for Treasurer in 1994, thatthe pool was too risky.

  • 8/8/2019 Derivative Disastors

    7/15

    The county declared bankruptcy when the

    Fed started a series of interest rate hikes (six

    consecutive times) that caused severe lossesto the pool.

    Citron's main purpose was to increase current

    income by exploiting the fact that medium-

    term maturities had higher yields than short-term investments.

  • 8/8/2019 Derivative Disastors

    8/15

  • 8/8/2019 Derivative Disastors

    9/15

  • 8/8/2019 Derivative Disastors

    10/15

  • 8/8/2019 Derivative Disastors

    11/15

    FINDINGS

    Lack of control

    Risk limit

    Investor Overconfidence

    Yield curve

    Value at risk Opportunity loss

    diversification

  • 8/8/2019 Derivative Disastors

    12/15

    Lessons For Financial

    institutions

    1) Monitor Trader Carefully-Particularly high

    profit making traders trades must be fully

    accountable,to know whether the highprofits are made by taking unreasonable risk.

    1) Separate Front, Middle and Back office-So

    that any disastrous nature of the trade is not

    concealed.

  • 8/8/2019 Derivative Disastors

    13/15

    3)Do not blindly trust models- Followingincorrect models can ruin the company as in

    the case of kidder peaboy and chemical

    banks.

    4)Beware when everyone is following the

    same strategy-Give rise to unstable market

    and large losses for the market participants.

  • 8/8/2019 Derivative Disastors

    14/15

    Learning For All Users Of

    Derivatives.

    Define Risk Limits.

    Taking the risk limits seriously- Sticking to thepre-decided risk limit. e.g. Orange County

    Do not assume you can outguess the market

    Do not underestimate the benefit ofdiversification.

    Carry out scenario analysis and stress test.

  • 8/8/2019 Derivative Disastors

    15/15

    CONCLUSION

    Derivative provide treasures with very

    efficient ways to manage risks.

    Derivative should be appropriately used i.e.

    either for hedging or speculation.

    Importance of internal control.