Demographic Profile of Senate District 25 · 2020. 6. 3. · Demographic Profile of Senate District...
Transcript of Demographic Profile of Senate District 25 · 2020. 6. 3. · Demographic Profile of Senate District...
-
Prepared by the Strategic Initiatives Group Office of Legislative Research and General Counsel
2012
A Special Report to
Senator Lyle W. Hillyard
June 2020
Demographic Profile of Senate District 25
-
OFFICE OF LEGISLATIVE RESEARCH AND GENERAL COUNSEL John Q. Cannon, Director
John L. Fellows, General Counsel
Utah State Capitol Complex | W210 House Building | P.O. Box 145210 | Salt Lake City, Utah 84114 - 5210
Office: (801) 538-1032 | Fax: (801) 538-1712
June 1, 2020
Senator Lyle W. Hillyard
Senate District 25
RE: Demographic Profile of Senate District 25
The Strategic Initiatives Group within the Office of Legislative Research and General Counsel
has created a detailed demographic profile of the legislative district that you represent. This
profile contains summaries of information from the American Community Survey, which is an
ongoing nationwide survey that is conducted by the United States Census to produce information
on social, economic, housing, and demographic characteristics. The information from the
American Community Survey contained in this profile was obtained between January 1, 2014
and December 31, 2018, making it the most recent, accurate, complete information available.
The Strategic Initiatives Group was created to conduct long-term strategic planning to inform
policy analysis on issues of statewide concern for decades to come. We hope the 2020 profiles
prove helpful as you not only identify trends and issues but also as you evaluate proposals that
are intended to benefit the constituencies within your district. This profile not only provides
detailed demographic information about the constituents within your district, but it also provides
a comparison of this information to other legislative districts and to the statewide average.
After redistricting, when legislative districts are redrawn, we will produce profiles of the new
districts. This 2020 profile may be useful then, as a comparison to your new district. However
this profile is used, we hope it adds value to your legislative service.
Additionally, the American Community Survey contains a great deal of information that cannot
be included in a profile of this length. In truth, the American Community Survey contains more
than a thousand tables, with dozens of fields each. Moreover, the United State Census Bureau
conducts other surveys in addition to the American Community Survey. Please let us know if
you have a question about your district that is not answered in this profile. Perhaps we can find
the answer in Census data that is not used here.
Finally, if you have an idea about how the Strategic Initiatives Group may benefit the
Legislature, please let us know.
Kind Regards,
Jerry Howe
Strategic Initiatives Manager
-
Location of Cities and Districts
1
9
2
8
10
43
11
6
12
5
13 14
23
7
13
27
16
24
14
15
2611
21
1920
18
22
19
123
17
DAVIS
WEBER
MORGAN
UTAH SENATESenate Districts
Salt Lake County Senate Districts
Weber and Davis County Senate Districts
Utah County Senate Districts
LegendCityCityCityCityCountySenate District
-
District Senator1 Luz Escamilla2 Derek L. Kitchen3 Gene Davis4 Jani Iwamoto5 Karen Mayne6 Wayne A. Harper7 Deidre M. Henderson8 Kathleen Riebe9 Kirk A. Cullimore10 Lincoln Fillmore11 Daniel McCay12 Daniel W. Thatcher13 Jacob L. Anderegg14 Daniel Hemmert15 Keith Grover16 Curtis S. Bramble17 Scott D. Sandall18 Ann Millner19 Allen M. Christensen20 David G. Buxton21 Jerry W. Stevenson22 J. Stuart Adams23 Todd Weiler24 Ralph Okerlund25 Lyle W. Hillyard26 Ronald Winterton27 David P. Hinkins28 Evan J. Vickers29 Don L. Ipson
Membership of the Utah Senate
-
Demographic Profile ofSenate District 25
June 2020
Prepared by theStrategic Initiatives Group
Jerry Howe, ManagerJoseph Wade
Office of Legislative Research and General CounselUsing Data Collected by the United States Census Bureau
(American Community Survey 2014-2018 5-year Data Release)
Utah State Capitol Complex, House Building Suite W210Salt Lake City, Utah 84114-5210
-
Table of Contents
Page
DISTRICT PROFILE. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
COMPARISON CHARTS AND MAPS
Age. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
Race. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
Hispanic or Latino. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
Language Spoken at Home.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
Birthplace and Citizenship. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
Household Type. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
Household Type and Size. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
Marital Status. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
Women Giving Birth. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26
Child Living Arrangements.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28
Grandparent Living with Grandchild.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30
Education - Highest Level of Attainment. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32
Bachelor's Degree Attainment. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34
Veterans. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36
Employment by Industry. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38
Means of Transportation to Work. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42
Travel Time to Work. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44
Sources of Household Income.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46
Household Income.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48
Poverty. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50
Food Stamps by Poverty Status. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52
Food Stamps and Cash Public Assistance. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54
Housing. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56
Home Ownership.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58
Mortgage Status. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60
Year Moved into Unit. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62
Moved in Past Year. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 64
Vacancy Rates. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 66
APPENDIX
Table 1 - Age.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70
Table 2 - Race.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 71
Table 3 - Hispanic or Latino.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 72
Table 4 - Language Spoken at Home. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 73
Table 5 - Birthplace and Citizenship. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 74
Page 2
-
Table of Contents (continued)
Page
Table 6 - Household Type. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 75
Table 7 - Household Type and Size.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 76
Table 8 - Marital Status. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 77
Table 9 - Women Giving Birth. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 78
Table 10 - Child Living Arrangements. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 79
Table 11 - Grandparent Living with Grandchild. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 80
Table 12 - Education - Highest Level of Attainment. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 81
Table 13 - Bachelor's Degree Attainment. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 82
Table 14 - Veterans. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 83
Table 15 - Employment by Industry. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 84
Table 16 - Means of Transportation to Work. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 86
Table 17 - Travel Time to Work. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 87
Table 18 - Sources of Household Income. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 88
Table 19 - Household Income. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 89
Table 20 - Poverty. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 90
Table 21 - Food Stamps by Poverty Status. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 91
Table 22 - Food Stamps and Cash Public Assistance. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 92
Table 23 - Housing. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 93
Table 24 - Home Ownership. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 94
Table 25 - Mortgage Status. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 95
Table 26 - Year Moved into Unit. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 96
Table 27 - Moved in Past Year. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 97
Table 28 - Vacancy Rates. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 98
Page 3
-
Subject District State Subject District StatePercentage of Population, by Age
0-4 Years . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9% 8%
5-17 Years . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .20% 22% 15-19 Years . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1% 1%
18-24 Years . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .21% 11% 20-24 Years . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .8% 8%
25-44 Years . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .25% 28% 25-29 Years . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .15% 15%
45-64 Years . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .16% 20% 30-34 Years . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .14% 14%
65+ Years . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9% 11% 35-39 Years . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .9% 7%
40-44 Years . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1% 2%
Percentage of Population, by Race 45-50 Years . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1% 0%
White . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 90% 86%
Black . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1% 1%
American Indian . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .0% 1%
Asian . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2% 2% Living with 2 Parents, Both in Labor Force . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .42% 43%
Hawaiian or Pacific Islander . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .0% 1% Living with 2 Parents, One in Labor Force . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .41% 38%
Other Single Race . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4% 5% Living with 2 Parents, Neither in Labor Force . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1% 1%
Two or More Races . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2% 3% Living with 1 Parent, Parent in Labor Force . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .13% 16%
Living with 1 Parent, Parent Not in Labor Force . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3% 3%
Percentage of Population, by Hispanic or Latino
Hispanic or Latino . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .11% 14%
Not Hispanic or Latino . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .89% 86%
Grandparents Not Living with Grandchildren . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .98% 96%
2% 3%
English Only . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .88% 85%
Spanish . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7% 10% 1% 1%
Other Indo-European . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2% 2%
Asian or Pacific Islander . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2% 2%
Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1% 1%
No High School Diploma . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .7% 8%
High School Graduate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .20% 23%
Some College . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .27% 26%
Born in Utah . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .63% 62% Associate's Degree . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .8% 10%
Born in Another Western State . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .20% 18% Bachelor's Degree . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .25% 22%
Born Elsewhere as a U.S. Citizen . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .10% 12% Master's, Doctorate, or Professional Degree . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .13% 11%
Naturalized Citizen . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2% 3%
Not a Citizen . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .5% 5%
Percentage of Households, by Household Type Male and Female
Family, Married Couple, with Children
-
Subject District State Subject District State
Ag, Forestry, Mining, Fishing, Hunting . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3% 2% In Poverty, Received Food Stamps . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4% 3%
Construction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4% 7% In Poverty, Did Not Receive Food Stamps . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .12% 7%
Manufacturing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .16% 11% Not in Poverty, Received Food Stamps . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4% 4%
Wholesale Trade . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2% 3% Not in Poverty, Did Not Receive Food Stamps . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .80% 86%
Retail Trade . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .11% 12%
Transp., Warehousing, Utilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3% 5%
Information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2% 2%
Finance, Insurance, Real Estate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4% 7% Received Food Stamps or Cash Public Assistance . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
9% 8%
Prof., Scientific, Mgmt, Admin., Waste Mgmt Svcs . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
13% 12%
Educ., Hlth Care, Social Assist. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .28% 22% 91% 92%
Arts, Entertain, Rec., Accomm., Food . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .9% 9%
Public Administration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2% 5% Percentage of Housing Units, by Type of Structure
Other Services . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4% 4% House Detached . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .60% 69%
House Attached . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .8% 6%
2-4 Apts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .15% 7%
5-19 Apts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .7% 8%
Work at Home . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .6% 6% 20-49 Apts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3% 3%
Drive Alone . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .74% 76% 50+ Apts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3% 3%
Car Pool . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .12% 11% Mobile Home . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4% 3%
Public Transport. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2% 2% Boat, RV, Van, etc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .0% 0%
Walk or Bike . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .6% 3%
Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1% 1%
Owner-Occupied . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .59% 70%
Renter-Occupied . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .41% 30%
0-14 Minutes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .58% 33%
15-29 Minutes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .29% 40%
30-44 Minutes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .7% 16%
45-59 Minutes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2% 5% Mortgage, No 2nd Mortgage, No Home Equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .56% 60%
60+ Minutes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4% 5% Mortgage, 2nd Mortgage, No Home Equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2% 3%
Mortgage, No 2nd Mortgage, Home Equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .6% 7%
Mortgage, 2nd Mortgage, Home Equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1% 0%
No Mortgage . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .35% 29%
Wage or Salary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .76% 78%
Self-employment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .5% 5%
Interest, Dividends, or Net Rental . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .6% 4%
Social Security . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .6% 6% Owner-Occupied, Moved in Before 2010 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .40% 44%
Supplemental Security . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .0% 0% Owner-Occupied, Moved in 2010-2014 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .15% 19%
Cash Public Assistance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .0% 0% Owner-Occupied, Moved in After 2014 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .7% 10%
Retirement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .6% 5% Renter-Occupied, Moved in Before 2010 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3% 4%
Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2% 1% Renter-Occupied, Moved in 2010-2014 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .17% 13%
Renter-Occupied, Moved in After 2014 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .18% 11%
Percentage of Households, by Household Income
< $15,000 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .10% 7%
$15,000 - $29,999 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .16% 11%
$30,000 - $44,999 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .16% 13% Lived in Same House 1 Year Ago . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .78% 83%
$45,000 - $59,999 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .13% 12% Moved from Same City . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .7% 4%
$60,000 - $74,999 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .12% 12% Moved within Same County, but Different City . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .6% 5%
$75,000 - $99,999 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .13% 15% Moved from Different County within Utah . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .5% 3%
$100,000 - $149,999 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .13% 18% Moved from Another Western State . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3% 2%
$150,000 - $199,999 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4% 6% Moved from a Non-western State . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1% 1%
$200,000+ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3% 6% Moved from Abroad . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1% 1%
Percentage of Housing Units, by Vacancy
Housing Unit Vacant . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .13% 10%
Married Couple Family . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .35% 27% Housing Unit Occupied . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .87% 90%
Male Householder Family . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2% 5%
Female Householder Family . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .14% 22%
Non-family Household . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .49% 46%
Demographic Profile of Senate District 25
Percentage of Civilian Employed Workers Age 16+,
by Industry of Employment
Percentage of Households, by Poverty and Receipt
of Food Stamps
Percentage of Households Receiving, or Not
Receiving, Food Stamps or Cash Public Assistance
Percentage of Population, by Occupant Type and
Length of Occupancy
Percentage of Population Age 1+, by Moved in the
Past Year
Percentage of Households in Poverty, by Household
Type
Did Not Receive Food Stamps or Cash Public
Assistance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Percentage of Workers Age 16+, by Means of
Transportation to Work
Percentage of Occupied Housing Units, by Owned
or Rented
Percentage of Workers Age 16+ Who Do Not Work
at Home, by Travel Time
Percentage of Owner-Occupied Housing Units, by
Mortgage Status
Percentage of Aggregate Household Income, by
Source
Page 5
-
8%
22%
11%
28%
20%
11%9%
20% 21%
25%
16%
9%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
0-4 Years 5-17 Years 18-24 Years 25-44 Years 45-64 Years 65+ Years
State Senate District 25
Figure 1.1 - AGE
Percentage of Population, by Age(Categories are mutually exclusive and sum to 100%)
Figure 1.2 - AGE
Percentage of Population Age 0-4(First category in Figure 1.1; same data presented in Figure 1.3; additional data in Table 1 of the appendix)
13 7
15
10
21
11 1 5
17
22
►2
5 12 23
►St
ate 20 27 8 26 14 18 28 19 6 3 24 29 4 9 16 2
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
Senate Districts
Bar colors correspond to map colors on next page
Page 6
-
Percentage of Population Age 0-4(Same data presented in Figure 1.2)
1
9
2
8
10
4
11
3
612
5
13 14
23
7
13
27
16
24
14
15
2611 27
21
1920
18
22
191 23
17
Figure 1.3 - AGE
Senate Districts
Salt Lake County Senate Districts
Weber and Davis County Senate Districts
Utah County Senate Districts
Legend
Page 7
13% - 13%10% - 11%8% - 9%7%5% - 6%
1
25
192
Number ofDistricts in Range Values in Range
-
Figure 1.4 - AGE
Percentage of Population Who are School Age Children (Age 5-17)(Second category in Figure 1.1; same data presented in Figure 1.6; additional data in Table 1 of the appendix)
Figure 1.5- AGE
Percentage of Population Age 65+(Last category in Figure 1.1; additional data in Table 1 of the appendix)
29 4
24
28 8 9
27
23
18
19 2 3 6
►St
ate 26 22 17 5 20
►2
5 14 15 1 7 16 10 11 21 12 13
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
Senate Districts
13
14
21 7
11
17
10 1
22
12
27
26
20
28
24
►St
ate 19 5
►2
5 23 18 6 9 29 15 4 8 3 16 2
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
Senate Districts
Bar colors correspond to map colors on next page
Page 8
-
Percentage of Population Who are School Age Children (Age 5-17)(Same data presented in Figure 1.4)
1
9
2
8
10
4
11
3
612
5
13 14
23
7
13
27
16
24
14
15
2611 27
21
1920
18
22
191 23
17
Figure 1.6 - AGE
Senate Districts
Salt Lake County Senate Districts
Weber and Davis County Senate Districts
Utah County Senate Districts
Legend
Page 9
31%27% - 28%18% - 26%14% - 16%10%
1
13
204
Number ofDistricts in Range Values in Range
-
* The U.S. Census Bureau distinguishes between ethnicity and race. For example, a person could be Hispanic (ethnicity) and white(race), or Hispanic and black (race).
86%
1% 1% 2% 1%5% 3%
90%
1% 0% 2% 0%4% 2%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
White Black American Indian Asian Hawaiian orPacific Islander
Other SingleRace
Two or MoreRaces
State Senate District 25
Figure 2.1 - RACE
Percentage of Population, by Race*(Categories are mutually exclusive and sum to 100%)
Figure 2.2 - RACE
Percentage of Population Who are White(First category in Figure 2.1; same data presented in Figure 2.3; additional data in Table 2 of the appendix)
14
13 7
11
17 4
28
24
26
22 9
19
29
►2
5 16 20 18 21 15 10 23 27
►St
ate 8 6 12 2 3 5 1
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Senate Districts
Bar colors correspond to map colors on next page
Page 10
-
Percentage of Population Who are White(Same data presented in Figure 2.2)
1
9
2
8
10
4
11
3
612
5
13 14
23
7
13
27
16
24
14
15
2611 27
21
1920
18
22
191 23
17
Figure 2.3 - RACE
Senate Districts
Salt Lake County Senate Districts
Weber and Davis County Senate Districts
Utah County Senate Districts
Legend
Page 11
94%93%86% - 92%65% - 79%49%
1
15
202
Number ofDistricts in Range Values in Range
-
* The U.S. Census Bureau distinguishes between ethnicity and race. For example, a person could be Hispanic (ethnicity) and white(race), or Hispanic and black (race).
14%
86%
11%
89%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Hispanic or Latino Not Hispanic or Latino
State Senate District 25
Figure 3.1 - HISPANIC OR LATINO
Percentage of Population, by Hispanic or Latino*(Categories are mutually exclusive and sum to 100%)
Figure 3.2 - HISPANIC OR LATINO
Percentage of Population Who are Hispanic or Latino(First category in Figure 3.1; same data presented in Figure 3.3; additional data in Table 3 of the appendix)
1 5
12 6
19 3
15
18 2 7 8
►St
ate 20 23 29 16 21 26 27
►2
5 17 10 24 28 13 11 9 22 4 14
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
Senate Districts
Bar colors correspond to map colors on next page
Page 12
-
Percentage of Population Who are Hispanic or Latino(Same data presented in Figure 3.2)
1
9
2
8
10
4
11
3
612
5
13 14
23
7
13
27
16
24
14
15
2611 27
21
1920
18
22
191 23
17
Figure 3.3 - HISPANIC OR LATINO
Senate Districts
Salt Lake County Senate Districts
Weber and Davis County Senate Districts
Utah County Senate Districts
Legend
Page 13
32% - 44%18% - 24%8% - 15%7%6%
2
22
176
Number ofDistricts in Range Values in Range
-
85%
10%
2% 2% 1%
88%
7%2% 2% 1%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
English Only Spanish Other Indo-European Asian or Pacific Islander Other
State Senate District 25
Figure 4.1 - LANGUAGE SPOKEN AT HOME
Percentage of Population Age 5+, by Language Spoken at Home(Categories are mutually exclusive and sum to 100%)
Figure 4.2 - LANGUAGE SPOKEN AT HOME
Percentage of Population Age 5+ Who Do Not Speak English at Home(Sum of last four categories in Figure 4.1; same data presented in Figure 4.3; additional data in Table 4 of the appendix)
1 5 3 2
15 6
12
16 8
27
►St
ate 7 19 18 23
►2
5 26 9 21 4 10 11 13 29 24 20 14 22 28 17
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
Senate Districts
Bar colors correspond to map colors on next page
Page 14
-
Percentage of Population Age 5+ Who Do Not Speak English at Home(Same data presented in Figure 4.2)
1
9
2
8
10
4
11
3
612
5
13 14
23
7
13
27
16
24
14
15
2611 27
21
1920
18
22
191 23
17
Figure 4.3 - LANGUAGE SPOKEN AT HOME
Senate Districts
Salt Lake County Senate Districts
Weber and Davis County Senate Districts
Utah County Senate Districts
Legend
Page 15
35% - 46%17% - 26%10% - 15%9%8%
2
42
147
Number ofDistricts in Range Values in Range
-
62%
18%
12%
3% 5%
63%
20%
10%
2%5%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
Born in Utah Born in AnotherWestern State
Born Elsewhereas a U.S. Citizen
Naturalized Citizen Not a Citizen
State Senate District 25
Figure 5.1 - BIRTHPLACE AND CITIZENSHIP
Percentage of Population, by Birthplace and Citizenship Status(Categories are mutually exclusive and sum to 100%)
Figure 5.2 - BIRTHPLACE AND CITIZENSHIP
Percentage of Population Born in Utah(First category in Figure 5.1; same data presented in Figure 5.3; additional data in Table 5 of the appendix)
24
20
17 7
10
13
21
22
11
14
23
27 6
12
►2
5 18
►St
ate 26 9 4 5 19 28 8 15 29 3 1 16 2
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
Senate Districts
Bar colors correspond to map colors on next page
Page 16
-
Percentage of Population Born in Utah(Same data presented in Figure 5.2)
1
9
2
8
10
4
11
3
612
5
13 14
23
7
13
27
16
24
14
15
2611 27
21
1920
18
22
191 23
17
Figure 5.3 - BIRTHPLACE AND CITIZENSHIP
Senate Districts
Salt Lake County Senate Districts
Weber and Davis County Senate Districts
Utah County Senate Districts
Legend
Page 17
71% - 74%67%57% - 66%48% - 53%43%
3
14
183
Number ofDistricts in Range Values in Range
-
Figure 5.4 - BIRTHPLACE AND CITIZENSHIP
Percentage of Population Who are Naturalized Citizens(Fourth category in Figure 5.1; additional data in Table 5 of the appendix)
Figure 5.5 - BIRTHPLACE AND CITIZENSHIP
Percentage of Population Who are Not Citizens(Last category in Figure 5.1; same data presented in Figure 5.6; additional data in Table 5 of the appendix)
1 5 3 2
15 6
12 8
18
16
►St
ate 23 7 19
►2
5 26 29 9 4 10 11 27 28 24 13 17 21 14 20 22
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
14%
16%
18%
20%
Senate Districts
1 5 3 2 6 8
12 9
15
10 4
►St
ate 23 18 19 11 7 29
►2
5 16 20 21 22 26 14 13 17 28 27 24
0%
1%
2%
3%
4%
5%
6%
7%
8%
Senate Districts
Bar colors correspond to map colors on next page
Page 18
-
Percentage of Population Who are Not Citizens(Same data presented in Figure 5.5)
1
9
2
8
10
4
11
3
612
5
13 14
23
7
13
27
16
24
14
15
2611 27
21
1920
18
22
191 23
17
Figure 5.6 - BIRTHPLACE AND CITIZENSHIP
Senate Districts
Salt Lake County Senate Districts
Weber and Davis County Senate Districts
Utah County Senate Districts
Legend
Page 19
18%6% - 13%3% - 5%2%1%
1
14
158
Number ofDistricts in Range Values in Range
-
* Households are categorized as either family or non-family. A family is a household where the householder is related to at least one other person in the household by birth, marriage, or adoption.
32%
9%
34%
19%
6%
31%
7%
35%
18%
10%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
FamilyMarried Couple
with Children
-
Percentage of Households That are a Family with a Child Under Age 18 Present(Same data presented in Figure 6.2)
1
9
2
8
10
4
11
3
612
5
13 14
23
7
13
27
16
24
14
15
2611 27
21
1920
18
22
191 23
17
Figure 6.3 - HOUSEHOLD TYPE
Senate Districts
Salt Lake County Senate Districts
Weber and Davis County Senate Districts
Utah County Senate Districts
Legend
Page 21
66%51% - 54%37% - 48%28% - 33%18%
1
15
166
Number ofDistricts in Range Values in Range
-
* Households are categorized as either family or nonfamily. A family is a household where the householder is related to at least one other person in the household by birth, marriage, or adoption. A "two-person family" could be a husband and wife, or a parent and child.
27%28%
15%
4%
19%
4%2%
28%27%
13%
3%
18%
5% 5%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
Family2 Persons
Family3-4 Persons
Family5-6 Persons
Family7+ Persons
Nonfamily1 Person
Nonfamily2 Persons
Nonfamily3+ Persons
State Senate District 25
Figure 7.1 - HOUSEHOLD TYPE AND SIZE
Percentage of Households, by Household Type and Size*(Categories are mutually exclusive and sum to 100%)
Figure 7.2 - HOUSEHOLD TYPE AND SIZE
Percentage of Households That are 3-4 Person Family Households(Second category in Figure 7.1; same data presented in Figure 7.3; additional data in Table 7 of the appendix)
12
10
11
21
20
17 9 6
13
22 1 7 5
14
19
18
23
►St
ate 4 26 8
►2
5 15 27 24 28 3 16 29 2
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
Senate Districts
Bar colors correspond to map colors on next page
Page 22
-
Percentage of Households That are 3-4 Person Family Households(Same data presented in Figure 7.2)
1
9
2
8
10
4
11
3
612
5
13 14
23
7
13
27
16
24
14
15
2611 27
21
1920
18
22
191 23
17
Figure 7.3 - HOUSEHOLD TYPE AND SIZE
Senate Districts
Salt Lake County Senate Districts
Weber and Davis County Senate Districts
Utah County Senate Districts
Legend
Page 23
35%34%26% - 33%21% - 24%17%
2
15
201
Number ofDistricts in Range Values in Range
-
69%
4% 3%
13% 11%
75%
3% 3%
10% 9%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
MarriedSpouse Present
MarriedSpouse Not Present
Widowed Divorced Never Married
State Senate District 25
Figure 8.1 - MARITAL STATUS
Percentage of Population Age 30-74, by Marital Status(Categories are mutually exclusive and sum to 100%)
Figure 8.2 - MARITAL STATUS
Percentage of Population Age 30-74 Who are Married with Spouse Present(First category in Figure 8.1; same data presented in Figure 8.3; additional data in Table 8 of the appendix)
13
14
11
17
22
21 7
10
►2
5 9 27 28 29 24 26 20 23
►St
ate 16 15 4 19 12 18 6 8 5 1 3 2
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
Senate Districts
Bar colors correspond to map colors on next page
Page 24
-
Percentage of Population Age 30-74 Who are Married with Spouse Present(Same data presented in Figure 8.2)
1
9
2
8
10
4
11
3
612
5
13 14
23
7
13
27
16
24
14
15
2611 27
21
1920
18
22
191 23
17
Figure 8.3 - MARITAL STATUS
Senate Districts
Salt Lake County Senate Districts
Weber and Davis County Senate Districts
Utah County Senate Districts
Legend
Page 25
83% - 84%77% - 78%64% - 75%55% - 59%46%
2
23
175
Number ofDistricts in Range Values in Range
-
1%
8%
15%
14%
7%
2%
0%1%
8%
15% 14%
9%
1%1%
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
14%
16%
15-19 Years 20-24 Years 25-29 Years 30-34 Years 35-39 Years 40-44 Years 45-50 Years
State Senate District 25
Figure 9.1 - WOMEN GIVING BIRTH
Percentage of Women in Each Age CategoryGiving Birth in the Past 12 Months
(Numbers are the percentage of women in each age category giving birth; categories do not sum to 100%)
Figure 9.2 - WOMEN GIVING BIRTH
Percentage of Women Age 15-19 Giving Birth in the Past 12 Months(First category in Figure 9.1; same data presented in Figure 9.3; additional data in Table 9 of the appendix)
27 5
21
12 2
26 3 6 1
28 9
16
►St
ate 8 20
►2
5 13 23 17 19 22 15 10 24 18 29 14 4 7 11
0.0%
0.5%
1.0%
1.5%
2.0%
2.5%
Senate Districts
Bar colors correspond to map colors on next page
Page 26
-
Percentage of Women Age 15-19 Giving Birth in the Past 12 Months(Same data presented in Figure 9.2)
1
9
2
8
10
4
11
3
612
5
13 14
23
7
13
27
16
24
14
15
2611 27
21
1920
18
22
191 23
17
Figure 9.3 - WOMEN GIVING BIRTH
Senate Districts
Salt Lake County Senate Districts
Weber and Davis County Senate Districts
Utah County Senate Districts
Legend
Page 27
2.0% - 2.3%1.4% - 1.8%0.6% - 1.2%0.3% - 0.5%0.0%
6
34
135
Number ofDistricts in Range Values in Range
-
43%
38%
1%
16%
3%
42%41%
1%
13%
3%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
Living with 2 ParentsBoth in Labor Force
Living with 2 ParentsOne in Labor Force
Living with 2 ParentsNeither in Labor Force
Living with 1 ParentParent in Labor Force
Living with 1 ParentParent Not in Labor
Force
State Senate District 25
Figure 10.1 - CHILD LIVING ARRANGEMENTS
Percentage of Children Age 0-17 Living with Parent(s),by Living Arrangement
(Categories are mutually exclusive and sum to 100%)
Figure 10.2 - CHILD LIVING ARRANGEMENTS
Percentage of Children Age 0-17 Living with One Parent(Sum of last two categories in Figure 10.1; same data presented in Figure 10.3; additional data in Table 10 of the appendix)
1 3 2 8 5 6
18
19
12
27
29
20
28
►St
ate 15 24 26 4
►2
5 23 17 21 9 22 16 10 7 11 14 13
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
Senate Districts
Bar colors correspond to map colors on next page
Page 28
-
Percentage of Children Age 0-17 Living with One Parent(Same data presented in Figure 10.2)
1
9
2
8
10
4
11
3
612
5
13 14
23
7
13
27
16
24
14
15
2611 27
21
1920
18
22
191 23
17
Figure 10.3 - CHILD LIVING ARRANGEMENTS
Senate Districts
Salt Lake County Senate Districts
Weber and Davis County Senate Districts
Utah County Senate Districts
Legend
Page 29
40%30% - 33%14% - 26%12% - 13%9% - 10%
1
23
194
Number ofDistricts in Range Values in Range
-
* Includes grandparents who live in their adult child's home.** A grandparent is considered "financially responsible" for their grandchild if the grandparent is financially responsible for food, shelter, clothing, day care, or other basic needs.
96%
3% 1%
98%
2% 1%0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Households with GrandparentsNot Living with Grandchildren
Households with Grandparents Livingwith Grandchildren,
Grandparent is Not FinanciallyResponsible
Households with Grandparents Livingwith Grandchildren,
Grandparent is Financially Responsible
State Senate District 25
Figure 11.1 - GRANDPARENT LIVING WITH GRANDCHILD
Percentage of Households,by Grandparent Living with Grandchild Age 0-17*
(Categories are mutually exclusive and sum to 100%)
Figure 11.2 - GRANDPARENT LIVING WITH GRANDCHILD
Percentage of Households with a Grandparent Living withGrandchildren Age 0-17 and Grandparent is Financially Responsible**
(Last category in Figure 11.1; same data presented in Figure 11.3; additional data in Table 11 of the appendix)
1 5
21 6
12
17
24 7
27
20
26
14
10
►St
ate 22 19 15 29 13 18 23 9 3 8 28
►2
5 11 16 4 2
0.0%
0.5%
1.0%
1.5%
2.0%
2.5%
3.0%
3.5%
Senate Districts
Bar colors correspond to map colors on next page
Page 30
-
Percentage of Households with a Grandparent Living withGrandchildren Age 0-17 and Grandparent is Financially Responsible(Same data presented in Figure 11.2)
1
9
2
8
10
4
11
3
612
5
13 14
23
7
13
27
16
24
14
15
2611 27
21
1920
18
22
191 23
17
Figure 11.3 - GRANDPARENT LIVING WITH GRANDCHILD
Senate Districts
Salt Lake County Senate Districts
Weber and Davis County Senate Districts
Utah County Senate Districts
Legend
Page 31
3.1%1.7% - 2.3%0.8% - 1.6%0.7%0.3%
1
13
195
Number ofDistricts in Range Values in Range
-
8%
23%
26%
10%
22%
11%
7%
20%
27%
8%
25%
13%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
No High SchoolDiploma
High SchoolGraduate
Some College Associate'sDegree
Bachelor'sDegree
Master's,Doctorate, orProfessional
Degree
State Senate District 25
Figure 12.1 - EDUCATION - HIGHEST LEVEL OF ATTAINMENT
Percentage of Population Age 25+, by Highest Level ofEducational Attainment
(Categories are mutually exclusive and sum to 100%)
Figure 12.2 - EDUCATION - HIGHEST LEVEL OF ATTAINMENT
Percentage of Population Age 25+ without a High School Diploma(First category in Figure 12.1; same data presented in Figure 12.3; additional data in Table 12 of the appendix)
1 5
12 3 6
18
24
26
19
27
28 2
15
►St
ate 7
►2
5 17 8 23 29 20 21 16 14 9 11 22 4 10 13
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
Senate Districts
Bar colors correspond to map colors on next page
Page 32
-
Percentage of Population Age 25+ without a High School Diploma(Same data presented in Figure 12.2)
1
9
2
8
10
4
11
3
612
5
13 14
23
7
13
27
16
24
14
15
2611 27
21
1920
18
22
191 23
17
Figure 12.3 - EDUCATION - HIGHEST LEVEL OF ATTAINMENT
Senate Districts
Salt Lake County Senate Districts
Weber and Davis County Senate Districts
Utah County Senate Districts
Legend
Page 33
19% - 24%12% - 13%5% - 10%4%3%
2
43
182
Number ofDistricts in Range Values in Range
-
31%
38%35%
40%
33%
44%42%
46%
35% 35%
29%
24%
38%41%
34%
31%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
25-34 Years 35-44 Years 45-64 Years 65+ Years
State - Male Senate Dist 25 - Male State - Female House Dist 25 - Female
Figure 13.1 - BACHELOR'S DEGREE ATTAINMENT
Percentage of Population in Each Age Category, by Sex, with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher
(Numbers are the percentage of persons in each age and sex category; categories do not sum to 100%)
Figure 13.2 - BACHELOR'S DEGREE ATTAINMENT
Percentage of Population Age 25+ with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher(This data is not included in Figure 13.1; same data presented in Figure 13.3; additional data in Table 13 of the appendix)
4 2
16
14 9
11
13
22
23 8
►2
5 15 10
►St
ate 21 26 7 3 19 29 18 28 17 27 6 20 24 12 5 1
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
Senate Districts
Bar colors correspond to map colors on next page
Page 34
-
Percentage of Population Age 25+ with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher(Same data presented in Figure 13.2)
1
9
2
8
10
4
11
3
612
5
13 14
23
7
13
27
16
24
14
15
2611 27
21
1920
18
22
191 23
17
Figure 13.3 - BACHELOR'S DEGREE ATTAINMENT
Senate Districts
Salt Lake County Senate Districts
Weber and Davis County Senate Districts
Utah County Senate Districts
Legend
Page 35
51% - 59%45% - 48%27% - 42%20% - 23%14% - 16%
2
33
192
Number ofDistricts in Range Values in Range
-
* Veterans are people who have served on active duty in any branch of the military, but are not currently serving. People whoserved in the National Guard or Reserves are classified as veterans only if they were called or ordered to active duty, not counting training. Active duty refers to military members who are currently serving full-time in their military capacity. A civilian is any person not on active duty with the U.S. Armed Forces.
2%
4%
7%
17%
23%
1%
3%5%
15%
24%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
18-34 Years 35-54 Years 55-64 Years 65-74 Years 75+ Years
State Senate District 25
Figure 14.1 - VETERANS
Percentage of Civilians in Each Age Category Who are Veterans*(Numbers are the percentage of civilians in each age category, not the percentage of total civilians in the state or district;
categories do not sum to 100%)
Figure 14.2 - VETERANS
Percentage of Civilians Age 18+ Who are Veterans(This data is not included in Figure 14.1; same data presented in Figure 14.3; additional data in Table 14 of the appendix)
20
28
29
21
18
22
24
19
17
12
27 9
►St
ate 6 23 8 26 5 4 1 3 2 10 14 7 11
►2
5 13 15 16
0%
1%
2%
3%
4%
5%
6%
7%
8%
9%
10%
Senate Districts
Bar colors correspond to map colors on next page
Page 36
-
Percentage of Civilians Age 18+ Who are Veterans(Same data presented in Figure 14.2)
1
9
2
8
10
4
11
3
612
5
13 14
23
7
13
27
16
24
14
15
2611 27
21
1920
18
22
191 23
17
Figure 14.3 - VETERANS
Senate Districts
Salt Lake County Senate Districts
Weber and Davis County Senate Districts
Utah County Senate Districts
Legend
Page 37
9%7%5% - 6%3% - 4%2%
5
16
125
Number ofDistricts in Range Values in Range
-
* A civilian is any person not on active duty with the U.S. Armed Forces.
2%
7%
11%
3%
12%
5%
2%
7%
12%
22%
9%
5% 4%3%
4%
16%
2%
11%
3%2%
4%
13%
28%
9%
2%4%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
Ag, Forestry,Mining, Fishing,
Hunting
Construction Manufacturing Wholesale Trade Retail Trade Transp.,Warehousing,
Utilities
Information Finance,Insurance, Real
Estate
Prof., Scientific,Mgmt, Admin.,
Waste Mgmt Svcs
Educ., Hlth Care,Social Assist.
Arts, Entertain,Rec., Accomm.,
Food
PublicAdministration
Other Services
State Senate District 25
Figure 15.1 - EMPLOYMENT BY INDUSTRY
Percentage of Civilian Employed Workers Age 16+,by Industry of Employment*
(Categories are mutually exclusive and sum to 100%)
Figure 15.2 - EMPLOYMENT BY INDUSTRY
Percentage of Civilian Employed Workers Age 16+Who Work in Manufacturing
(Third category in Figure 15.1; same data presented in Figure 15.3; additional data in Table 15 of the appendix)
17
19
►2
5 12 20 5 1 18 7 6 10 21
►St
ate 22 3 23 11 13 24 9 15 2 28 14 4 27 8 29 16 26
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
Senate Districts
Bar colors correspond to map colors on next page
Page 38
-
Percentage of Civilian Employed Workers Age 16+Who Work in Manufacturing(Same data presented in Figure 15.2)
1
9
2
8
10
4
11
3
612
5
13 14
23
7
13
27
16
24
14
15
2611 27
21
1920
18
22
191 23
17
Figure 15.3 - EMPLOYMENT BY INDUSTRY
Senate Districts
Salt Lake County Senate Districts
Weber and Davis County Senate Districts
Utah County Senate Districts
Legend
Page 39
21%14% - 17%7% - 13%5%4%
1
12
196
Number ofDistricts in Range Values in Range
-
Figure 15.4 - EMPLOYMENT BY INDUSTRY
Percentage of Civilian Employed Workers Age 16+ Who Work in Education,and Health and Social Assistance*
(Tenth category in Figure 15.1; same data presented in Figure 15.6; additional data in Table 15 of the appendix)
Figure 15.5 - EMPLOYMENT BY INDUSTRY
Percentage of Civilian Employed Workers Age 16+ Who Work in Arts, Entertainment, Recreation, Accomodation, and Food Services
(Eleventh category in Figure 15.1; additional data in Table 15 of the appendix)
* A civilian is any person not on active duty with the U.S. Armed Forces.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10
►1
1 12 13
►1
4 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
Senate Districts
9
24 4
►2
5 29 17 19 28 27 22 15
►St
ate 18 10 6 7 28 20 30 27 21 13 26 29 25 26 12 23 16 8
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
Senate Districts
Bar colors correspond to map colors on next page
Page 40
-
Percentage of Civilian Employed Workers Age 16+ Who Work in Education,and Health and Social Assistance(Same data presented in Figure 15.4)
1
9
2
8
10
4
11
3
612
5
13 14
23
7
13
27
16
24
14
15
2611 27
21
1920
18
22
191 23
17
Figure 15.6 - EMPLOYMENT BY INDUSTRY
Senate Districts
Salt Lake County Senate Districts
Weber and Davis County Senate Districts
Utah County Senate Districts
Legend
Page 41
36%24% - 30%18% - 24%14% - 16%13%
1
22
213
Number ofDistricts in Range Values in Range
-
6%
76%
11%
2% 3% 1%6%
74%
12%
2%6%
1%0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
Work at Home Drive Alone Car Pool Public Transport. Walk or Bike Other
State Senate District 25
Figure 16.1 - MEANS OF TRANSPORTATION TO WORK
Percentage of Workers Age 16+, by Means of Transportation to Work(Categories are mutually exclusive and sum to 100%)
Figure 16.2 - MEANS OF TRANSPORTATION TO WORK
Percentage of Workers Age 16+ Who Drive Alone to Work(Second category in Figure 16.1; same data presented in Figure 16.3; additional data in Table 16 of the appendix)
20
18
21
19
22
29
23
27
12 6
11 4
14
17
10 7
26
►St
ate 15 9 28 5 24 3 13 8
►2
5 1 2 16
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
Senate Districts
Bar colors correspond to map colors on next page
Page 42
-
Percentage of Workers Age 16+ Who Drive Alone to Work(Same data presented in Figure 16.2)
1
9
2
8
10
4
11
3
612
5
13 14
23
7
13
27
16
24
14
15
2611 27
21
1920
18
22
191 23
17
Figure 16.3 - MEANS OF TRANSPORTATION TO WORK
Senate Districts
Salt Lake County Senate Districts
Weber and Davis County Senate Districts
Utah County Senate Districts
Legend
Page 43
81%80%74% - 79%71%62% - 63%
2
21
222
Number ofDistricts in Range Values in Range
-
33%
40%
16%
5% 5%
58%
29%
7%2% 4%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
0-14 Minutes 15-29 Minutes 30-44 Minutes 45-59 Minutes 60+ Minutes
State Senate District 25
Figure 17.1 - TRAVEL TIME TO WORK
Percentage of Workers Age 16+ Who Do Not Work at Home, by Travel Time(Categories are mutually exclusive and sum to 100%)
Figure 17.2 - TRAVEL TIME TO WORK
Average Travel Time to Work of Workers Age 16+Who Do Not Work at Home
(This data is not included in Figure 17.1; same data presented in Figure 17.3; additional data in Table 17 of the appendix)
13
12
10
17
11
21 5
19
20
22 9 6
14 7
►St
ate 26 1 18 8 23 3 27 4 2 24 15 28 16
►2
5 29
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
Min
ute
s
Senate Districts
Bar colors correspond to map colors on next page
Page 44
-
Average Travel Time to Work of Workers Age 16+Who Do Not Work at Home(Same data presented in Figure 17.2)
1
9
2
8
10
4
11
3
612
5
13 14
23
7
13
27
16
24
14
15
2611 27
21
1920
18
22
191 23
17
Figure 17.3 - TRAVEL TIME TO WORK
Senate Districts
Salt Lake County Senate Districts
Weber and Davis County Senate Districts
Utah County Senate Districts
Legend
Page 45
29 Minutes25 - 26 Minutes19 - 24 Minutes18 Minutes16 Minutes
1
22
222
Number ofDistricts in Range Values in Range
-
* Household income is categorized into the eight types shown in Figure 18.1. Aggregate household income for each income type is the sum of all income from that income type for all households in the legislative district.
78%
5% 4% 6%0% 0%
5%1%
76%
5% 6% 6%0% 0%
6%2%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
Wage or Salary Self-employment Interest,Dividends,
or Net Rental
Social Security SupplementalSecurity
Cash PublicAssistance
Retirement Other
State Senate District 25
Figure 18.1 - SOURCES OF HOUSEHOLD INCOME
Percentage of Aggregate Household Income, by Source*(Categories are mutually exclusive and sum to 100%)
Figure 18.2 - SOURCES OF HOUSEHOLD INCOME
Percentage of Aggregate Household Income fromInterest, Dividends, or Net Rental Income
(Third category in Figure 18.1; same data presented in Figure 18.3; additional data in Table 18 of the appendix)
4
16
26
29 2 8
►2
5 14 23 9 28 18
►St
ate 27 19 3 22 15 11 6 7 24 12 17 13 1 10 21 20 5
0%
1%
2%
3%
4%
5%
6%
7%
8%
9%
Senate Districts
Bar colors correspond to map colors on next page
Page 46
-
Percentage of Aggregate Household Income fromInterest, Dividends, or Net Rental Income(Same data presented in Figure 18.2)
1
9
2
8
10
4
11
3
612
5
13 14
23
7
13
27
16
24
14
15
2611 27
21
1920
18
22
191 23
17
Figure 18.3 - SOURCES OF HOUSEHOLD INCOME
Senate Districts
Salt Lake County Senate Districts
Weber and Davis County Senate Districts
Utah County Senate Districts
Legend
Page 47
8%6% - 7%3% - 5%2%1%
3
17
144
Number ofDistricts in Range Values in Range
-
7%
11%
13% 12%12%
15%
18%
6%6%
10%
16% 16%
13%12%
13% 13%
4%3%
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
14%
16%
18%
20%
< $15,000 $15,000 -$29,999
$30,000 -$44,999
$45,000 -$59,999
$60,000 -$74,999
$75,000 -$99,999
$100,000 -$149,999
$150,000 -$199,999
$200,000+
State Senate District 25
Figure 19.1 - HOUSEHOLD INCOME
Percentage of Households, by Household Income(Categories are mutually exclusive and sum to 100%)
Figure 19.2 - HOUSEHOLD INCOME
Average Household Income(This data is not included in Figure 19.1; same data presented in Figure 19.3; additional data in Table 19 of the appendix)
11 4
14
10 9
13
26
22
23
21 8
►St
ate 2 19 20 6 7 17 18 12 29 27 16 15 5 28
►2
5 24 3 1
$0
$20,000
$40,000
$60,000
$80,000
$100,000
$120,000
$140,000
Senate Districts
Bar colors correspond to map colors on next page
Page 48
-
Average Household Income(Same data presented in Figure 19.2)
1
9
2
8
10
4
11
3
612
5
13 14
23
7
13
27
16
24
14
15
2611 27
21
1920
18
22
191 23
17
Figure 19.3 - HOUSEHOLD INCOME
Senate Districts
Salt Lake County Senate Districts
Weber and Davis County Senate Districts
Utah County Senate Districts
Legend
Page 49
$121,408 - $131,762$101,579 - $115,279$69,682 - $91,949$63,812 - $66,383$62,617 - $62,617
2
12
186
Number ofDistricts in Range Values in Range
-
* For a family household, a household is classified as in poverty when the total income of the householder's family is below a poverty threshold. For nonfamily households, the householder's own income is compared with the appropriate threshold. The poverty threshold varies based on family size, number of children, and, for one- and two-person households, age of the householder.
27%
5%
22%
46%
35%
2%
14%
49%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
Married Couple Family Male Householder Family Female Householder Family Non-family Household
State Senate District 25
Figure 20.1 - POVERTY
Percentage of Households in Poverty, by Household Type*(Categories are mutually exclusive and sum to 100%)
Figure 20.2 - POVERTY
Percentage of Total Households in Poverty(This data is not included in Figure 20.1; same data presented in Figure 20.3; additional data in Table 20 of the appendix)
16
►2
5 2 1 3 28 15 18 24 27 29 26
►St
ate 19 8 7 5 17 23 12 20 6 21 14 22 4 9 13 11 10
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
Senate Districts
Bar colors correspond to map colors on next page
Page 50
-
Percentage of Total Households in Poverty(Same data presented in Figure 20.2)
1
9
2
8
10
4
11
3
612
5
13 14
23
7
13
27
16
24
14
15
2611 27
21
1920
18
22
191 23
17
Figure 20.3 - POVERTY
Senate Districts
Salt Lake County Senate Districts
Weber and Davis County Senate Districts
Utah County Senate Districts
Legend
Page 51
25%14% - 17%6% - 13%5%3% - 4%
1
23
167
Number ofDistricts in Range Values in Range
-
*Eligibility for the federal food stamp program now known as SNAP (Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program) is both income and asset based. A household's gross income must be less than 130% of poverty and the household's net income must be less than 100% of poverty. In addition, the household must have less than $2,000 in assets. For households with elderly or disabled members, the asset limit is $3,250.
3%7%
4%
86%
4%
12%
4%
80%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
In PovertyReceived Food Stamps
In PovertyDid Not Receive Food Stamps
Not in PovertyReceived Food Stamps
Not in PovertyDid Not Receive Food Stamps
State Senate District 25
Figure 21.1 - FOOD STAMPS BY POVERTY STATUS
Percentage of Households, by Poverty and Receipt of Food Stamps*(Categories are mutually exclusive and sum to 100%)
Figure 21.2 - FOOD STAMPS BY POVERTY STATUS
Percentage of Households in Poverty That Do Not Receive Food Stamps(Second category in Figure 21.1; same data presented in Figure 21.3; additional data in Table 21 of the appendix)
16
►2
5 2 28 3 15 24 1 29 26 18
►St
ate 27 19 8 7 23 17 4 5 6 21 12 20 14 9 11 13 22 10
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
Senate Districts
Bar colors correspond to map colors on next page
Page 52
-
Percentage of Households in Poverty That Do Not Receive Food Stamps(Same data presented in Figure 21.2)
1
9
2
8
10
4
11
3
612
5
13 14
23
7
13
27
16
24
14
15
2611 27
21
1920
18
22
191 23
17
Figure 21.3 - FOOD STAMPS BY POVERTY STATUS
Senate Districts
Salt Lake County Senate Districts
Weber and Davis County Senate Districts
Utah County Senate Districts
Legend
Page 53
22%10% - 12%5% - 9%4%3%
1
37
153
Number ofDistricts in Range Values in Range
-
* Cash public assistance includes general assistance and Temporary Assistance to Needy Families (TANF). Separate payments received for hospital or other medical care (vendor payments) are excluded. Also excluded is Supplemental Security Income (SSI) and noncash benefits such as Food Stamps.
8%
92%
9%
91%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Received Food Stamps or Cash Public Assistance Did Not Receive Food Stamps or Cash Public Assistance
State Senate District 25
Figure 22.1 - FOOD STAMPS AND CASH PUBLIC ASSISTANCE
Percentage of Households Receiving, or Not Receiving, Food Stampsor Cash Public Assistance*
(Categories are mutually exclusive and sum to 100%)
Figure 22.2 - FOOD STAMPS AND CASH PUBLIC ASSISTANCE
Percentage of Households Receiving Food Stamps or Cash Public Assistance(First category in Figure 22.1; same data presented in Figure 22.3; additional data in Table 22 of the appendix)
1 5
18 3
28
27
12 7
15
21
►2
5 24 2 29 19
►St
ate 17 8 20 26 6 16 22 23 14 13 10 9 11 4
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
14%
16%
Senate Districts
Bar colors correspond to map colors on next page
Page 54
-
Percentage of Households Receiving Food Stamps or Cash Public Assistance(Same data presented in Figure 22.2)
1
9
2
8
10
4
11
3
612
5
13 14
23
7
13
27
16
24
14
15
2611 27
21
1920
18
22
191 23
17
Figure 22.3 - FOOD STAMPS AND CASH PUBLIC ASSISTANCE
Senate Districts
Salt Lake County Senate Districts
Weber and Davis County Senate Districts
Utah County Senate Districts
Legend
Page 55
15%10% - 13%5% - 9%4%3%
1
23
176
Number ofDistricts in Range Values in Range
-
* A house detached is a 1-unit structure detached from any other house, that is, with open space on all four sides. A house attached is a 1-unit structure that has one or more walls extending from ground to roof separating it from adjoining structures. A house attached includes a duplex, twin home, or townhouse. An apartment is a unit in a structure containing two or more unitsthat are not a house attached.
69%
6% 7% 8%3% 3% 3%
0%
60%
8%
15%
7%3% 3% 4%
0%0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
HouseDetached
HouseAttached
2-4 Apts 5-19 Apts 20-49 Apts 50+ Apts Mobile Home Boat, RV,Van, etc.
State Senate District 25
Figure 23.1 - HOUSING
Percentage of Housing Units, by Type of Structure*(Categories are mutually exclusive and sum to 100%)
Figure 23.2 - HOUSING
Percentage of Housing Units That are a Detached House(First category in Figure 23.1; same data presented in Figure 23.3; additional data in Table 23 of the appendix)
24
20
14 9
17
13
12
11
21
22 7 4 6
19
27 5
10
28
29
23
►St
ate 26 18 1
►2
5 8 15 16 3 2
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
Senate Districts
Bar colors correspond to map colors on next page
Page 56
-
Percentage of Housing Units That are a Detached House(Same data presented in Figure 23.2)
1
9
2
8
10
4
11
3
612
5
13 14
23
7
13
27
16
24
14
15
2611 27
21
1920
18
22
191 23
17
Figure 23.3 - HOUSING
Senate Districts
Salt Lake County Senate Districts
Weber and Davis County Senate Districts
Utah County Senate Districts
Legend
Page 57
84% - 85%79% - 83%69% - 76%44% - 65%37% - 38%
3
27
125
Number ofDistricts in Range Values in Range
-
70%
30%
59%
41%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
Owner-Occupied Renter-Occupied
State Senate District 25
Figure 24.1 - HOME OWNERSHIP
Percentage of Occupied Housing Units, by Owned or Rented(Categories are mutually exclusive and sum to 100%)
Figure 24.2 - HOME OWNERSHIP
Percentage of Occupied Housing Units Owned by Occupant(First category in Figure 24.1; same data presented in Figure 24.3; additional data in Table 24 of the appendix)
13
20
11
14 9
22
17
12
10
24
21
19 6
27 4 7
23
26 5
►St
ate 29 28 18 8 1
►2
5 15 3 2 16
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
Senate Districts
Bar colors correspond to map colors on next page
Page 58
-
Percentage of Occupied Housing Units Owned by Occupant(Same data presented in Figure 24.2)
1
9
2
8
10
4
11
3
612
5
13 14
23
7
13
27
16
24
14
15
2611 27
21
1920
18
22
191 23
17
Figure 24.3 - HOME OWNERSHIP
Senate Districts
Salt Lake County Senate Districts
Weber and Davis County Senate Districts
Utah County Senate Districts
Legend
Page 59
84% - 85%82% - 83%68% - 80%47% - 63%40% - 41%
2
26
163
Number ofDistricts in Range Values in Range
-
60%
3%7%
0%
29%
56%
2%6%
1%
35%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
MortgageNo 2nd MortgageNo Home Equity
Mortgage2nd Mortgage
No Home Equity
MortgageNo 2nd Mortgage
Home Equity
Mortgage2nd MortgageHome Equity
No Mortgage
State Senate District 25
Figure 25.1 - MORTGAGE STATUS
Percentage of Owner-Occupied Housing Units, by Mortgage Status(Categories are mutually exclusive and sum to 100%)
Figure 25.2 - MORTGAGE STATUS
Percentage of Owner-Occupied Housing Units without a Mortgage(Last category in Figure 25.1; same data presented in Figure 25.3; additional data in Table 25 of the appendix)
27
24
29 4
26
28
16
►2
5 8 2 15 23 18 9 22
►St
ate 3 19 17 5 14 6 1 20 7 12 11 21 10 13
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
Senate Districts
Bar colors correspond to map colors on next page
Page 60
-
Percentage of Owner-Occupied Housing Units without a Mortgage(Same data presented in Figure 25.2)
1
9
2
8
10
4
11
3
612
5
13 14
23
7
13
27
16
24
14
15
2611 27
21
1920
18
22
191 23
17
Figure 25.3 - MORTGAGE STATUS
Senate Districts
Salt Lake County Senate Districts
Weber and Davis County Senate Districts
Utah County Senate Districts
Legend
Page 61
41% - 43%37% - 38%28% - 35%24% - 27%16% - 19%
2
54
144
Number ofDistricts in Range Values in Range
-
44%
19%
10%
4%
13%11%
40%
15%
7%
3%
17% 18%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
Owner-OccupiedMoved in
Before 2010
Owner-OccupiedMoved in
2010-2014
Owner-OccupiedMoved in
After 2014
Renter-OccupiedMoved in
Before 2010
Renter-OccupiedMoved in
2010-2014
Renter-OccupiedMoved in
After 2014
State Senate District 25
Figure 26.1 - YEAR MOVED INTO UNIT
Percentage of Population, by Occupant Type and Length of Occupancy(Categories are mutually exclusive and sum to 100%)
Figure 26.2 - YEAR MOVED INTO UNIT
Percentage of Population in Occupied Housing Units WhoMoved in Prior to 2010
(Sum of first and fourth categories in Figure 26.1; same data presented in Figure 26.3; additional data in Table 26 of appendix)
9 6
24
14
20
27 4
17
23
22 5
12
11
21
19
►St
ate 18 10 26 8 1 7
►2
5 28 15 3 29 13 2 16
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
Senate Districts
Bar colors correspond to map colors on next page
Page 62
-
Percentage of Population in Occupied Housing Units WhoMoved in Prior to 2010(Same data presented in Figure 26.2)
1
9
2
8
10
4
11
3
612
5
13 14
23
7
13
27
16
24
14
15
2611 27
21
1920
18
22
191 23
17
Figure 26.3 - YEAR MOVED INTO UNIT
Senate Districts
Salt Lake County Senate Districts
Weber and Davis County Senate Districts
Utah County Senate Districts
Legend
Page 63
60%56% - 58%43% - 54%38% - 41%32% - 35%
2
25
173
Number ofDistricts in Range Values in Range
-
83%
4% 5% 3% 2% 1% 1%
78%
7% 6% 5% 3% 1% 1%0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
Lived in SameHouse 1 Year
Ago
Moved fromSame City
Moved withinSame County,but Different
City
Moved fromDifferent County
within Utah
Moved fromAnother
Western State
Moved from aNon-western
State
Moved fromAbroad
State Senate District 25
Figure 27.1 - MOVED IN PAST YEAR
Percentage of Population Age 1+, by Moved in the Past Year(Categories are mutually exclusive and sum to 100%)
Figure 27.2 - MOVED IN PAST YEAR
Percentage of Population Age 1+ Who Moved to Utah in the Past Year (Sum of last three categories in Figure 27.1; same data presented in Figure 27.3; additional data in Table 27 of the appendix)
16 2
28 3
►2
5 15 29 26 8 1
►St
ate 7 4 10 21 9 24 13 14 22 18 23 19 11 5 17 6 27 12 20
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
14%
16%
Senate Districts
Bar colors correspond to map colors on next page
Page 64
-
Percentage of Population Age 1+ Who Moved to Utah in the Past Year (Same data presented in Figure 27.2)
1
9
2
8
10
4
11
3
612
5
13 14
23
7
13
27
16
24
14
15
2611 27
21
1920
18
22
191 23
17
Figure 27.3 - MOVED IN PAST YEAR
Senate Districts
Salt Lake County Senate Districts
Weber and Davis County Senate Districts
Utah County Senate Districts
Legend
Page 65
7.2% - 13.6%5.0% - 5.5%3.1% - 4.5%2.6% - 2.9%1.8% - 2.4%
2
34
164
Number ofDistricts in Range Values in Range
-
* Housing units used or intended for use only in certain seasons or for weekends or other occasional use are considered vacant. Seasonal units include those used for summer or winter sports or recreation, e.g., second homes and cabins.
10%
90%
13%
87%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Housing Unit Vacant Housing Unit Occupied
State Senate District 25
Figure 28.1 - VACANCY RATES
Percentage of Housing Units, by Vacancy*(Categories are mutually exclusive and sum to 100%)
Figure 28.2 - VACANCY RATES
Percentage of Housing Units That are Vacant(First category in Figure 28.1; same data presented in Figure 28.3; additional data in Table 28 of the appendix)
26
24
28
27
29
19
►2
5
►St
ate 2 18 8 17 16 3 15 9 4 23 22 20 10 14 12 11 1 7 21 5 6 13
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
Senate Districts
Bar colors correspond to map colors on next page
Page 66
-
Percentage of Housing Units That are Vacant(Same data presented in Figure 28.2)
1
9
2
8
10
4
11
3
612
5
13 14
23
7
13
27
16
24
14
15
2611 27
21
1920
18
22
191 23
17
Figure 28.3 - VACANCY RATES
Senate Districts
Salt Lake County Senate Districts
Weber and Davis County Senate Districts
Utah County Senate Districts
Legend
Page 67
27% - 38%13% - 20%5% - 10%4%3%
2
5895
Number ofDistricts in Range Values in Range
-
Page 68
-
AppendixNote: Percentages throughout the appendixare rounded to the nearest whole percent.
Page 69
-
District Percent District Percent District Percent District Percent District Percent District Percent
1 13 13% 13 31% 16 40% 2 37% 9 26% 29 22%
2 7 11% 14 28% 25 21% 3 35% 4 24% 4 15%
3 15 10% 21 27% 15 19% 8 32% 6 23% 24 15%
4 10 9% 7 27% 2 16% 12 32% 26 22% 28 15%
5 21 9% 11 27% 14 12% 10 31% 19 22% 8 14%
6 11 9% 17 26% 7 11% 13 31% 24 22% 9 14%
7 1 9% 10 26% 28 11% 5 31% 8 21% 27 13%
8 5 9% 1 24% 18 11% 23 30% 20 21% 23 13%
9 17 9% 22 24% 3 11% 1 30% 22 21% 18 12%
10 22 9% 12 24% 21 11% 11 30% 27 21% 19 12%
11 25 9% 27 24% 24 10% 6 30% 18 21% 2 11%
12 12 9% 26 24% 27 10% 19 29% 23 21% 3 11%
13 23 8% 20 23% 1 10% 15 29% 3 21% 6 11%
14 20 8% 28 22% 5 10% 20 29% 5 20% 26 10%
15 27 8% 24 22% 12 10% 21 29% 11 20% 22 10%
16 8 8% 19 21% 29 9% 4 28% 29 20% 17 10%
17 26 8% 5 21% 20 9% 18 28% 17 20% 5 10%
18 14 8% 25 20% 22 9% 7 28% 14 20% 20 9%
19 18 8% 23 20% 6 9% 26 27% 2 20% 25 9%
20 28 8% 18 20% 8 9% 22 27% 12 20% 14 9%
21 19 8% 6 20% 17 9% 9 26% 28 20% 15 8%
22 6 8% 9 19% 9 9% 17 26% 1 19% 1 8%
23 3 7% 29 19% 19 8% 25 25% 10 19% 7 7%
24 24 7% 15 19% 26 8% 27 24% 21 18% 16 7%
25 29 7% 4 18% 10 8% 28 24% 7 16% 10 7%
26 4 7% 8 16% 23 8% 24 24% 25 16% 11 7%
27 9 7% 3 15% 13 8% 14 23% 15 15% 21 7%
28 16 6% 16 14% 11 7% 29 23% 13 13% 12 7%
29 2 5% 2 10% 4 7% 16 22% 16 10% 13 5%
State 8% 22% 11% 28% 20% 11%Red line indicates state average.
Table 1 – AGE
Ran
kPercentage of Population, by Age
(see Figures 1.1 to 1.6)
0-4 Years 5-17 Years 18-24 Years 25-44 Years 45-64 Years 65+ Years
Page 70
-
District Percent District Percent District Percent District Percent District Percent District Percent District Percent
1 14 94% 3 5% 27 8% 2 6% 1 4% 1 32% 1 5%
2 13 93% 1 3% 26 3% 1 6% 5 4% 5 20% 6 4%
3 7 93% 2 2% 28 2% 3 6% 6 2% 12 13% 12 4%
4 11 92% 21 2% 3 2% 5 5% 3 1% 6 9% 18 4%
5 17 92% 8 2% 1 1% 6 4% 16 1% 3 9% 5 4%
6 4 92% 18 2% 29 1% 8 3% 12 1% 2 8% 21 4%
7 28 92% 5 2% 24 1% 10 3% 29 1% 23 5% 22 3%
8 24 92% 6 1% 5 1% 9 3% 2 1% 8 5% 15 3%
9 26 91% 10 1% 2 1% 4 3% 14 1% 19 4% 23 3%
10 22 91% 22 1% 20 1% 11 3% 9 1% 24 4% 16 3%
11 9 91% 15 1% 17 1% 16 3% 15 1% 18 4% 10 3%
12 19 90% 4 1% 15 1% 23 2% 8 1