Demographic and Housing Estimates (DP05) · 2017-04-20 · Demographic and Housing Estimates (DP05)...
21
Demographic and Housing Estimates (DP05) 2006-2010 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates (Not decennial census counts. See notes after table.) Council District # 1 Subject Estimate Estimate Margin of Error¹ Percent Percent Margin of Error¹ Reliability² High High High High High High Low High NC High High High High High High High High High High Moderate High High High High High High High High High High High High Low NC Low Low Low Low High Moderate Moderate Moderate Moderate Moderate Moderate Moderate +/-123 +/-123 Chippewa 0 0.0% +/-0.6 Navajo 0 0.0% +/-0.6 Total population: 85,552 Male 41,553 Female 43,999 Under 5 5,449 5 to 9 3,684 10 to 14 3,763 15 to 19 4,017 20 to 24 4,009 25 to 34 15,820 35 to 44 15,629 45 to 54 13,397 55 to 59 5,345 60 to 64 4,650 65 to 74 4,744 75 to 84 3,044 85 and over 2,001 Median Age 38.5 18 and over: 69,773 21 and over 67,860 62 and over 12,438 65 and over: 9,789 Male 33,821 Female 35,952 Male 3,959 Female 5,830 One Race 81,552 White 65,861 Black or African American 4,229 American Indian and Alaska Native: 670 Puget Sound Salish 20 Yakama 47 Cherokee 14 Sioux 86 Blackfeet 23 Tlingit-Haida 11 Asian: 8,604 Asian Indian 144 Chinese 901 Filipino 2,327 Japanese 653 Korean 575 Vietnamese 2,566 Other Asian 1,438 +/- 1,706 +/- 1,112 +/- 1,208 +/- 516 +/- 407 +/- 407 +/- 521 +/- 587 +/- 1,017 +/- 775 +/- 698 +/- 471 +/- 469 +/- 388 +/- 373 +/- 414 +/- 0.6 +/- 1,345 +/- 1,277 +/- 731 +/- 652 +/- 966 +/- 936 +/- 347 +/- 492 +/- 1,757 +/- 1,746 +/- 754 +/- 321 +/- 34 +/- 70 +/- 26 +/- 80 +/- 29 +/- 19 +/- 732 +/- 92 +/- 285 +/- 521 +/- 189 +/- 225 +/- 566 +/- 450 48.6% 51.4% 6.4% 4.3% 4.4% 4.7% 4.7% 18.5% 18.3% 15.7% 6.2% 5.4% 5.5% 3.6% 2.3% 81.6% 79.3% 14.5% 11.4% 48.5% 51.5% 40.4% 59.6% 95.3% 77.0% 4.9% 0.8% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 10.1% 0.2% 1.1% 2.7% 0.8% 0.7% 3.0% 1.7% X X X 100.0% +/-0.9 +/- 1 +/- 0.6 +/- 0.5 +/- 0.5 +/- 0.6 +/- 0.7 +/- 1.1 +/- 0.8 +/- 0.8 +/- 0.5 +/- 0.5 +/- 0.4 +/- 0.4 +/- 0.5 W +/- 1 +/- 0.9 W +/- 0.8 +/- 0.7 +/- 2.3 +/- 3.1 +/- 0.8 +/- 1.3 +/- 0.9 +/- 0.4 +/-0.1 +/-0.1 +/-0.1 +/-0.1 +/-0.1 +/- 0.8 +/- 0.1 +/- 0.3 +/- 0.6 +/- 0.2 +/- 0.3 +/- 0.7 +/- 0.5 Total population: 85,552 +/- 1,706 X 100.0% Two or More Races 4,000 +/- 595 4.7% +/- 0.7 One Race: 81,552 +/- 1,757 95.3% +/- 0.8 SEX AND AGE RACE +/-0.1 High Moderate 1 7/10/2014 Page 1 of 3 DP05 Demographic and Housing Estimates, 2006-2010 American Community Survey Geographic Area:
Transcript of Demographic and Housing Estimates (DP05) · 2017-04-20 · Demographic and Housing Estimates (DP05)...
Demographic and Housing Estimates (DP05)2006-2010 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates (Not decennial census counts. See notes after table.)
Council District # 1
Subject EstimateEstimate
Margin of Error¹ PercentPercent
Margin of Error¹ Reliability²
High
High
High
High
High
High
Low
High
NC
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
Moderate
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
Low
NC
Low
Low
Low
Low
High
Moderate
Moderate
Moderate
Moderate
Moderate
Moderate
Moderate
+/-123
+/-123
Chippewa 0 0.0% +/-0.6
Navajo 0 0.0% +/-0.6
Total population: 85,552
Male 41,553
Female 43,999
Under 5 5,449
5 to 9 3,684
10 to 14 3,763
15 to 19 4,017
20 to 24 4,009
25 to 34 15,820
35 to 44 15,629
45 to 54 13,397
55 to 59 5,345
60 to 64 4,650
65 to 74 4,744
75 to 84 3,044
85 and over 2,001
Median Age 38.5
18 and over: 69,773
21 and over 67,860
62 and over 12,438
65 and over: 9,789
Male 33,821
Female 35,952
Male 3,959
Female 5,830
One Race 81,552
White 65,861
Black or African American 4,229
American Indian and Alaska Native: 670
Puget Sound Salish 20
Yakama 47
Cherokee 14
Sioux 86
Blackfeet 23
Tlingit-Haida 11
Asian: 8,604
Asian Indian 144
Chinese 901
Filipino 2,327
Japanese 653
Korean 575
Vietnamese 2,566
Other Asian 1,438
+/- 1,706
+/- 1,112
+/- 1,208
+/- 516
+/- 407
+/- 407
+/- 521
+/- 587
+/- 1,017
+/- 775
+/- 698
+/- 471
+/- 469
+/- 388
+/- 373
+/- 414
+/- 0.6
+/- 1,345
+/- 1,277
+/- 731
+/- 652
+/- 966
+/- 936
+/- 347
+/- 492
+/- 1,757
+/- 1,746
+/- 754
+/- 321
+/- 34
+/- 70
+/- 26
+/- 80
+/- 29
+/- 19
+/- 732
+/- 92
+/- 285
+/- 521
+/- 189
+/- 225
+/- 566
+/- 450
48.6%
51.4%
6.4%
4.3%
4.4%
4.7%
4.7%
18.5%
18.3%
15.7%
6.2%
5.4%
5.5%
3.6%
2.3%
81.6%
79.3%
14.5%
11.4%
48.5%
51.5%
40.4%
59.6%
95.3%
77.0%
4.9%
0.8%
0.0%
0.1%
0.0%
0.1%
0.0%
0.0%
10.1%
0.2%
1.1%
2.7%
0.8%
0.7%
3.0%
1.7%
X
X X
100.0%
+/-0.9
+/- 1
+/- 0.6
+/- 0.5
+/- 0.5
+/- 0.6
+/- 0.7
+/- 1.1
+/- 0.8
+/- 0.8
+/- 0.5
+/- 0.5
+/- 0.4
+/- 0.4
+/- 0.5
W
+/- 1
+/- 0.9
W
+/- 0.8
+/- 0.7
+/- 2.3
+/- 3.1
+/- 0.8
+/- 1.3
+/- 0.9
+/- 0.4
+/-0.1
+/-0.1
+/-0.1
+/-0.1
+/-0.1
+/- 0.8
+/- 0.1
+/- 0.3
+/- 0.6
+/- 0.2
+/- 0.3
+/- 0.7
+/- 0.5
Total population: 85,552 +/- 1,706 X100.0%
Two or More Races 4,000 +/- 595 4.7% +/- 0.7
One Race: 81,552 +/- 1,757 95.3% +/- 0.8
SEX AND AGE
RACE
+/-0.1
High
Moderate
1 7/10/2014
Page 1 of 3DP05 Demographic and Housing Estimates, 2006-2010 American Community Survey
Geographic Area:
Council District # 1
Subject EstimateEstimate
Margin of Error¹ PercentPercent
Margin of Error¹ Reliability²
High
High
Moderate
Moderate
Low
Low
Low
Low
Moderate
High
Moderate
Moderate
Moderate
Low
High
High
Moderate
High
Moderate
Moderate
High
High
Moderate
Moderate
Moderate
High
High
High
Moderate
High
Moderate
Low
High
Low
High
High
Other Asian 1,438
Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander:
483
Native Hawaiian 85
Guamanian or Chamorro 17
Samoan 227
Other Pacific Islander 154
Some Other Race 1,705
Two or More Races: 4,000
White and Black or African American 734
White and American Indian and Alaska Native
434
White and Asian 1,670
Black or African American and American Indian and Alaska Native
70
White 69,521
Black or African American 5,343
American Indian and Alaska Native 1,390
Asian 10,705
Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander 937
Some Other Race 2,074
Hispanic or Latino of any race: 7,730
Mexican 5,235
Puerto Rican 494
Cuban 182
Other Hispanic or Latino 1,819
Not Hispanic or Latino: 77,822
White alone 60,641
Black or African American alone 4,088
American Indian and Alaska Native alone
572
Asian alone 8,550
Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander alone
483
Some other race alone 72
Two or more races: 3,416
Two races including Some other race 85
Two races excluding Some other race and Three or more races
3,331
Total Housing Units: 41,269
+/- 450
+/- 244
+/- 98
+/- 30
+/- 189
+/- 120
+/- 573
+/- 595
+/- 295
+/- 161
+/- 344
+/- 85
+/- 1,711
+/- 754
+/- 393
+/- 823
+/- 341
+/- 608
+/- 1,113
+/- 983
+/- 268
+/- 112
+/- 507
+/- 1,575
+/- 1,529
+/- 641
+/- 280
+/- 732
+/- 244
+/- 76
+/- 520
+/- 65
+/- 513
+/- 310
1.7%
0.6%
0.1%
0.0%
0.3%
0.2%
2.0%
4.7%
0.9%
0.5%
2.0%
0.1%
81.3%
6.2%
1.6%
12.5%
1.1%
2.4%
9.0%
6.1%
0.6%
0.2%
2.1%
91.0%
70.9%
4.8%
0.7%
10.0%
0.6%
0.1%
4.0%
0.1%
3.9%
100.0% X
+/- 0.5
+/- 0.3
+/- 0.1
+/-0.1
+/- 0.2
+/- 0.1
+/- 0.7
+/- 0.7
+/- 0.3
+/- 0.2
+/- 0.4
+/-0.1
+/- 1.2
+/- 0.9
+/- 0.5
+/- 0.9
+/- 0.4
+/- 0.7
+/- 1.3
+/- 1.1
+/- 0.3
+/- 0.1
+/- 0.6
+/- 0.3
+/- 1.1
+/- 0.7
+/- 0.3
+/- 0.8
+/- 0.3
+/-0.1
+/- 0.6
+/-0.1
+/- 0.6
Total population: 85,552 +/- 1,706 X100.0%
Total population: 85,552 +/- 1,706 X100.0%
RACES ALONE OR IN COMBINATION WITH ONE OR MORE OTHER RACES
HOUSING
HISPANIC OR LATINO AND RACE
1 7/10/2014
Page 2 of 3DP05 Demographic and Housing Estimates, 2006-2010 American Community Survey
Geographic Area:
U.S. Census Bureau, 2006-2010 American Community Survey (ACS), 5-Year estimates
City of Seattle, Department of Planning and Development (DPD)On the Web at: http://www.seattle.gov/dpd/Research/Population_Demographics/Overview/
Supporting documentation on code lists, subject definitions, data accuracy, and statistical testing can be found on the American Community Survey website in the Data and Documentation section.
Sample size and data quality measures (including coverage rates, allocation rates, and response rates) can be found on the American Community Survey website in the Methodology section.
Although the American Community Survey (ACS) produces population, demographic and housing unit estimates, for 2010, the 2010 Census provides the official counts of the population and housing units for the nation, states, counties, cities and towns. For 2006 to 2009, the Population Estimates Program provides intercensal estimates of the population for the nation, states, and counties.
Data are based on a sample and are subject to sampling variability. The degree of uncertainty for an estimate arising from sampling variability is represented through the use of a margin of error. The value shown here is the 90 percent margin of error. The margin of error can be interpreted roughly as providing a 90 percent probability that the interval defined by the estimate minus the margin of error and the estimate plus the margin of error (the lower and upper confidence bounds) contains the true value. In addition to sampling variability, the ACS estimates are subject to nonsampling error (for a discussion of nonsampling variability, see Accuracy of the Data). The effect of nonsampling error is not represented in these tables.
While the 2006-2010 American Community Survey (ACS) data generally reflect the December 2009 Office of Management and Budget (OMB) definitions of metropolitan and micropolitan statistical areas; in certain instances the names, codes, and boundaries of the principal cities shown in ACS tables may differ from the OMB definitions due to differences in the effective dates of the geographic entities.
Estimates of urban and rural population, housing units, and characteristics reflect boundaries of urban areas defined based on Census 2000 data. Boundaries for urban areas have not been updated since Census 2000. As a result, data for urban and rural areas from the ACS do not necessarily reflect the results of ongoing urbanization.
Explanation of Symbols:1. An '**' entry in the margin of error column indicates that either no sample observations or too few sample observations were available to compute a standard error and thus the margin of error. A statistical test is not appropriate.2. An '-' entry in the estimate column indicates that either no sample observations or too few sample observations were available to compute an estimate, or a ratio of medians cannot be calculated because one or both of the median estimates falls in the lowest interval or upper interval of an open-ended distribution.3. An '-' following a median estimate means the median falls in the lowest interval of an open-ended distribution.4. An '+' following a median estimate means the median falls in the upper interval of an open-ended distribution.5. An '***' entry in the margin of error column indicates that the median falls in the lowest interval or upper interval of an open-ended distribution. A statistical test is not appropriate.6. An '*****' entry in the margin of error column indicates that the estimate is controlled. A statistical test for sampling variability is not appropriate.7. An 'N' entry in the estimate and margin of error columns indicates that data for this geographic area cannot be displayed because the number of sample cases is too small.8. An '(X)' means that the estimate is not applicable or not available."
This is one of four reports that have been adapted from the ACS "Data Profile" (DP) Series. The four DP tables published by the Census Bureau are: DP02 Selected Social Characteristics; DP03 Selected Economic Characteristics; DP04 Selected Housing Characteristics; DP05 Demographic and Housing Estimates.
DPD has adapted these DP tables for reporting ACS estimates for locally-defined geographies. The locally defined areas covered in these reports are made up of multiple census tracts (except for a few Community Reporting Areas that are made up of only one Census Tract each), therefore estimates shown for these geographies are based on aggregating estimates for multiple census tracts. For ease of calculation, medians are the average of the medians.
¹ The ACS is a sample survey and as such, estimates carry sampling error. Margins of error (MOEs) provide a measure of sampling error
The MOEs displayed for the aggregated estimates in these reports could only be approximated using the formulas provided by the Census Bureau. These formulas do not account for “covariance” (or inter-relationship) between the aggregated estimates, and can understate or—more commonly—overstate the margins of error. In some cases, actual MOEs may be much different than approximated. MOEs of +/- 0.1 and below are displayed as +/- 0.1 based on Census Bureau convention.
² The reliability indicator of High, Moderate, or Low is meant to provide a general sense of an estimate's reliability. Data users will need to use discretion in identifying the level of reliability appropriate for their purposes.
“High” reliability: MOE is less than or equal to 20% of the estimate. Indicates that sampling error is small relative to the size of the estimate. Flagged green."Moderate” reliability: MOE is between 20% and 66.7% of the estimate. Flagged yellow to indicate that the estimate should be used with caution."Low” reliability: MOE is over 66.7% of the estimate. Flagged red to warn that sampling error is large relative to the estimate and that the estimate is very unreliable."NC": Estimate is 0. Reliability cannot be calculated.
Percent Margin of Error "W" value indicates the standard formula for estimating the percent MOE could not be applied (due to negative value under square root).
For more about MOEs, see Census Bureau notes below. For formulas, see “American Community Survey Multiyear Accuracy of the Data (3-year 2008-2010 and 5-year 2006-2010),” http://www.census.gov/acs/www/Downloads/data_documentation/Accuracy/MultiyearACSAccuracyofData2010.pdf.)
Census Bureau notes for DP05:
"For more information on understanding race and Hispanic origin data, please see the Census 2010 Brief entitled, Overview of Race and Hispanic Origin: 2010, issued March 2011. (pdf format)
The ACS questions on Hispanic origin and race were revised in 2008 to make them consistent with the Census 2010 question wording. Any changes in estimates for 2008 and beyond may be due to demographic changes, as well as factors including questionnaire changes, differences in ACS population controls, and methodological differences in the population estimates, and therefore should be used with caution. For a summary of questionnaire changes see http://www.census.gov/acs/www/methodology/questionnaire_changes/. For more information about changes in the estimates see http://www.census.gov/population/www/socdemo/hispanic/reports.html.
Notes:
Source:
Produced by:
1 7/10/2014
Page 3 of 3DP05 Demographic and Housing Estimates, 2006-2010 American Community Survey
Geographic Area:
Demographic and Housing Estimates (DP05)2006-2010 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates (Not decennial census counts. See notes after table.)
Council District # 2
Subject EstimateEstimate
Margin of Error¹ PercentPercent
Margin of Error¹ Reliability²
High
High
High
High
High
High
Low
High
NC
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
Moderate
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
Low
NC
Low
NC
Low
Low
High
Moderate
High
High
High
Low
High
Moderate
+/-123
+/-123
Chippewa 0 0.0% +/-0.6
Navajo 0 0.0% +/-0.6
Total population: 83,369
Male 41,880
Female 41,489
Under 5 5,670
5 to 9 4,664
10 to 14 5,133
15 to 19 5,078
20 to 24 5,211
25 to 34 11,938
35 to 44 12,579
45 to 54 11,759
55 to 59 5,357
60 to 64 4,415
65 to 74 5,410
75 to 84 4,153
85 and over 2,002
Median Age 38.9
18 and over: 64,794
21 and over 61,918
62 and over 13,987
65 and over: 11,565
Male 32,356
Female 32,438
Male 4,881
Female 6,684
One Race 79,857
White 24,806
Black or African American 19,298
American Indian and Alaska Native: 887
Puget Sound Salish 131
Yakama 8
Cherokee 10
Sioux 131
Blackfeet 53
Tlingit-Haida 0
Asian: 30,631
Asian Indian 342
Chinese 9,844
Filipino 6,904
Japanese 1,965
Korean 333
Vietnamese 7,078
Other Asian 4,165
+/- 2,243
+/- 1,541
+/- 1,421
+/- 626
+/- 566
+/- 577
+/- 578
+/- 609
+/- 879
+/- 803
+/- 701
+/- 520
+/- 485
+/- 511
+/- 476
+/- 452
+/- 1
+/- 1,672
+/- 1,559
+/- 925
+/- 866
+/- 1,149
+/- 1,080
+/- 428
+/- 657
+/- 2,272
+/- 1,402
+/- 1,606
+/- 376
+/- 115
+/- 13
+/- 16
+/- 150
+/- 87
+/-123
+/- 1,807
+/- 194
+/- 1,246
+/- 1,108
+/- 358
+/- 263
+/- 1,255
+/- 990
50.2%
49.8%
6.8%
5.6%
6.2%
6.1%
6.3%
14.3%
15.1%
14.1%
6.4%
5.3%
6.5%
5.0%
2.4%
77.7%
74.3%
16.8%
13.9%
49.9%
50.1%
42.2%
57.8%
95.8%
29.8%
23.1%
1.1%
0.2%
0.0%
0.0%
0.2%
0.1%
0.0%
36.7%
0.4%
11.8%
8.3%
2.4%
0.4%
8.5%
5.0%
X
X X
100.0%
+/-1.3
+/- 1.1
+/- 0.7
+/- 0.7
+/- 0.7
+/- 0.7
+/- 0.7
+/- 1
+/- 0.9
+/- 0.8
+/- 0.6
+/- 0.6
+/- 0.6
+/- 0.6
+/- 0.5
W
+/- 1.2
+/- 1.1
W
+/- 1
+/- 1
+/- 1.9
+/- 3.7
+/- 0.9
+/- 1.5
+/- 1.8
+/- 0.5
+/- 0.1
+/-0.1
+/-0.1
+/- 0.2
+/-0.6
+/- 1.9
+/- 0.2
+/- 1.5
+/- 1.3
+/- 0.4
+/- 0.3
+/- 1.5
+/- 1.2
Total population: 83,369 +/- 2,243 X100.0%
Two or More Races 3,512 +/- 597 4.2% +/- 0.7
One Race: 79,857 +/- 2,272 95.8% +/- 0.9
SEX AND AGE
RACE
+/- 0.1
High
Moderate
2 7/10/2014
Page 1 of 3DP05 Demographic and Housing Estimates, 2006-2010 American Community Survey
Geographic Area:
Council District # 2
Subject EstimateEstimate
Margin of Error¹ PercentPercent
Margin of Error¹ Reliability²
High
High
Moderate
Moderate
Low
Low
Moderate
Low
Moderate
High
Moderate
Moderate
Moderate
Low
High
High
Moderate
High
Moderate
Moderate
Moderate
Moderate
Low
Low
Moderate
High
High
High
Moderate
High
Moderate
Low
High
Moderate
High
High
Other Asian 4,165
Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander:
1,725
Native Hawaiian 152
Guamanian or Chamorro 413
Samoan 833
Other Pacific Islander 327
Some Other Race 2,510
Two or More Races: 3,512
White and Black or African American 526
White and American Indian and Alaska Native
412
White and Asian 977
Black or African American and American Indian and Alaska Native
99
White 27,399
Black or African American 20,499
American Indian and Alaska Native 2,096
Asian 32,475
Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander 1,977
Some Other Race 3,156
Hispanic or Latino of any race: 5,604
Mexican 4,528
Puerto Rican 260
Cuban 87
Other Hispanic or Latino 729
Not Hispanic or Latino: 77,765
White alone 22,205
Black or African American alone 19,095
American Indian and Alaska Native alone
639
Asian alone 30,545
Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander alone
1,725
Some other race alone 547
Two or more races: 3,009
Two races including Some other race 355
Two races excluding Some other race and Three or more races
2,654
Total Housing Units: 33,545
+/- 990
+/- 669
+/- 157
+/- 326
+/- 536
+/- 224
+/- 885
+/- 597
+/- 198
+/- 134
+/- 307
+/- 80
+/- 1,453
+/- 1,606
+/- 557
+/- 1,815
+/- 717
+/- 940
+/- 1,121
+/- 1,050
+/- 194
+/- 70
+/- 311
+/- 2,123
+/- 1,187
+/- 1,590
+/- 301
+/- 1,803
+/- 669
+/- 533
+/- 518
+/- 231
+/- 462
+/- 314
5.0%
2.1%
0.2%
0.5%
1.0%
0.4%
3.0%
4.2%
0.6%
0.5%
1.2%
0.1%
32.9%
24.6%
2.5%
39.0%
2.4%
3.8%
6.7%
5.4%
0.3%
0.1%
0.9%
93.3%
26.6%
22.9%
0.8%
36.6%
2.1%
0.7%
3.6%
0.4%
3.2%
100.0% X
+/- 1.2
+/- 0.8
+/- 0.2
+/- 0.4
+/- 0.6
+/- 0.3
+/- 1.1
+/- 0.7
+/- 0.2
+/- 0.2
+/- 0.4
+/-0.1
+/- 1.5
+/- 1.8
+/- 0.7
+/- 1.9
+/- 0.9
+/- 1.1
+/- 1.3
+/- 1.3
+/- 0.2
+/-0.1
+/- 0.4
+/- 0.4
+/- 1.2
+/- 1.8
+/- 0.4
+/- 1.9
+/- 0.8
+/- 0.6
+/- 0.6
+/- 0.3
+/- 0.5
Total population: 83,369 +/- 2,243 X100.0%
Total population: 83,369 +/- 2,243 X100.0%
RACES ALONE OR IN COMBINATION WITH ONE OR MORE OTHER RACES
HOUSING
HISPANIC OR LATINO AND RACE
2 7/10/2014
Page 2 of 3DP05 Demographic and Housing Estimates, 2006-2010 American Community Survey
Geographic Area:
U.S. Census Bureau, 2006-2010 American Community Survey (ACS), 5-Year estimates
City of Seattle, Department of Planning and Development (DPD)On the Web at: http://www.seattle.gov/dpd/Research/Population_Demographics/Overview/
Supporting documentation on code lists, subject definitions, data accuracy, and statistical testing can be found on the American Community Survey website in the Data and Documentation section.
Sample size and data quality measures (including coverage rates, allocation rates, and response rates) can be found on the American Community Survey website in the Methodology section.
Although the American Community Survey (ACS) produces population, demographic and housing unit estimates, for 2010, the 2010 Census provides the official counts of the population and housing units for the nation, states, counties, cities and towns. For 2006 to 2009, the Population Estimates Program provides intercensal estimates of the population for the nation, states, and counties.
Data are based on a sample and are subject to sampling variability. The degree of uncertainty for an estimate arising from sampling variability is represented through the use of a margin of error. The value shown here is the 90 percent margin of error. The margin of error can be interpreted roughly as providing a 90 percent probability that the interval defined by the estimate minus the margin of error and the estimate plus the margin of error (the lower and upper confidence bounds) contains the true value. In addition to sampling variability, the ACS estimates are subject to nonsampling error (for a discussion of nonsampling variability, see Accuracy of the Data). The effect of nonsampling error is not represented in these tables.
While the 2006-2010 American Community Survey (ACS) data generally reflect the December 2009 Office of Management and Budget (OMB) definitions of metropolitan and micropolitan statistical areas; in certain instances the names, codes, and boundaries of the principal cities shown in ACS tables may differ from the OMB definitions due to differences in the effective dates of the geographic entities.
Estimates of urban and rural population, housing units, and characteristics reflect boundaries of urban areas defined based on Census 2000 data. Boundaries for urban areas have not been updated since Census 2000. As a result, data for urban and rural areas from the ACS do not necessarily reflect the results of ongoing urbanization.
Explanation of Symbols:1. An '**' entry in the margin of error column indicates that either no sample observations or too few sample observations were available to compute a standard error and thus the margin of error. A statistical test is not appropriate.2. An '-' entry in the estimate column indicates that either no sample observations or too few sample observations were available to compute an estimate, or a ratio of medians cannot be calculated because one or both of the median estimates falls in the lowest interval or upper interval of an open-ended distribution.3. An '-' following a median estimate means the median falls in the lowest interval of an open-ended distribution.4. An '+' following a median estimate means the median falls in the upper interval of an open-ended distribution.5. An '***' entry in the margin of error column indicates that the median falls in the lowest interval or upper interval of an open-ended distribution. A statistical test is not appropriate.6. An '*****' entry in the margin of error column indicates that the estimate is controlled. A statistical test for sampling variability is not appropriate.7. An 'N' entry in the estimate and margin of error columns indicates that data for this geographic area cannot be displayed because the number of sample cases is too small.8. An '(X)' means that the estimate is not applicable or not available."
This is one of four reports that have been adapted from the ACS "Data Profile" (DP) Series. The four DP tables published by the Census Bureau are: DP02 Selected Social Characteristics; DP03 Selected Economic Characteristics; DP04 Selected Housing Characteristics; DP05 Demographic and Housing Estimates.
DPD has adapted these DP tables for reporting ACS estimates for locally-defined geographies. The locally defined areas covered in these reports are made up of multiple census tracts (except for a few Community Reporting Areas that are made up of only one Census Tract each), therefore estimates shown for these geographies are based on aggregating estimates for multiple census tracts. For ease of calculation, medians are the average of the medians.
¹ The ACS is a sample survey and as such, estimates carry sampling error. Margins of error (MOEs) provide a measure of sampling error
The MOEs displayed for the aggregated estimates in these reports could only be approximated using the formulas provided by the Census Bureau. These formulas do not account for “covariance” (or inter-relationship) between the aggregated estimates, and can understate or—more commonly—overstate the margins of error. In some cases, actual MOEs may be much different than approximated. MOEs of +/- 0.1 and below are displayed as +/- 0.1 based on Census Bureau convention.
² The reliability indicator of High, Moderate, or Low is meant to provide a general sense of an estimate's reliability. Data users will need to use discretion in identifying the level of reliability appropriate for their purposes.
“High” reliability: MOE is less than or equal to 20% of the estimate. Indicates that sampling error is small relative to the size of the estimate. Flagged green."Moderate” reliability: MOE is between 20% and 66.7% of the estimate. Flagged yellow to indicate that the estimate should be used with caution."Low” reliability: MOE is over 66.7% of the estimate. Flagged red to warn that sampling error is large relative to the estimate and that the estimate is very unreliable."NC": Estimate is 0. Reliability cannot be calculated.
Percent Margin of Error "W" value indicates the standard formula for estimating the percent MOE could not be applied (due to negative value under square root).
For more about MOEs, see Census Bureau notes below. For formulas, see “American Community Survey Multiyear Accuracy of the Data (3-year 2008-2010 and 5-year 2006-2010),” http://www.census.gov/acs/www/Downloads/data_documentation/Accuracy/MultiyearACSAccuracyofData2010.pdf.)
Census Bureau notes for DP05:
"For more information on understanding race and Hispanic origin data, please see the Census 2010 Brief entitled, Overview of Race and Hispanic Origin: 2010, issued March 2011. (pdf format)
The ACS questions on Hispanic origin and race were revised in 2008 to make them consistent with the Census 2010 question wording. Any changes in estimates for 2008 and beyond may be due to demographic changes, as well as factors including questionnaire changes, differences in ACS population controls, and methodological differences in the population estimates, and therefore should be used with caution. For a summary of questionnaire changes see http://www.census.gov/acs/www/methodology/questionnaire_changes/. For more information about changes in the estimates see http://www.census.gov/population/www/socdemo/hispanic/reports.html.
Notes:
Source:
Produced by:
2 7/10/2014
Page 3 of 3DP05 Demographic and Housing Estimates, 2006-2010 American Community Survey
Geographic Area:
Demographic and Housing Estimates (DP05)2006-2010 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates (Not decennial census counts. See notes after table.)
Council District # 3
Subject EstimateEstimate
Margin of Error¹ PercentPercent
Margin of Error¹ Reliability²
High
High
High
High
High
High
Low
High
Low
High
Moderate
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
Low
Low
Low
Low
NC
NC
High
Moderate
High
Moderate
Moderate
Moderate
Moderate
Moderate
+/- 27
+/- 30
Chippewa 24 0.0% +/-0.1
Navajo 26 0.0% +/-0.1
Total population: 83,275
Male 40,958
Female 42,317
Under 5 3,659
5 to 9 3,006
10 to 14 2,510
15 to 19 4,952
20 to 24 7,252
25 to 34 19,988
35 to 44 14,237
45 to 54 10,539
55 to 59 5,012
60 to 64 4,339
65 to 74 4,086
75 to 84 2,501
85 and over 1,194
Median Age 36.5
18 and over: 72,442
21 and over 68,159
62 and over 10,095
65 and over: 7,781
Male 35,372
Female 37,070
Male 3,190
Female 4,591
One Race 79,530
White 56,930
Black or African American 11,541
American Indian and Alaska Native: 973
Puget Sound Salish 18
Yakama 0
Cherokee 11
Sioux 0
Blackfeet 16
Tlingit-Haida 66
Asian: 7,702
Asian Indian 435
Chinese 1,698
Filipino 997
Japanese 1,095
Korean 841
Vietnamese 1,346
Other Asian 1,290
+/- 2,284
+/- 1,279
+/- 1,671
+/- 444
+/- 338
+/- 345
+/- 1,484
+/- 786
+/- 961
+/- 725
+/- 680
+/- 488
+/- 443
+/- 387
+/- 312
+/- 235
+/- 0.6
+/- 2,122
+/- 1,367
+/- 545
+/- 447
+/- 1,134
+/- 1,562
+/- 304
+/- 344
+/- 2,207
+/- 1,835
+/- 973
+/- 291
+/- 19
+/-123
+/- 13
+/-123
+/- 21
+/- 61
+/- 748
+/- 174
+/- 317
+/- 259
+/- 253
+/- 269
+/- 391
+/- 482
49.2%
50.8%
4.4%
3.6%
3.0%
5.9%
8.7%
24.0%
17.1%
12.7%
6.0%
5.2%
4.9%
3.0%
1.4%
87.0%
81.8%
12.1%
9.3%
48.8%
51.2%
41.0%
59.0%
95.5%
68.4%
13.9%
1.2%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.1%
9.2%
0.5%
2.0%
1.2%
1.3%
1.0%
1.6%
1.5%
X
X X
100.0%
+/-0.7
+/- 1.4
+/- 0.5
+/- 0.4
+/- 0.4
+/- 1.8
+/- 0.9
+/- 0.9
+/- 0.7
+/- 0.7
+/- 0.6
+/- 0.5
+/- 0.4
+/- 0.4
+/- 0.3
+/- 0.9
+/- 0.6
+/- 1.5
W
+/- 0.6
+/- 0.5
+/- 3.1
+/- 2.8
+/- 0.4
+/- 1.2
+/- 1.1
+/- 0.3
+/-0.1
+/-0.6
+/-0.1
+/-0.6
+/-0.1
+/- 0.9
+/- 0.2
+/- 0.4
+/- 0.3
+/- 0.3
+/- 0.3
+/- 0.5
+/- 0.6
Total population: 83,275 +/- 2,284 X100.0%
Two or More Races 3,745 +/- 554 4.5% +/- 0.7
One Race: 79,530 +/- 2,207 95.5% +/- 0.4
SEX AND AGE
RACE
+/-0.1
High
Moderate
3 7/10/2014
Page 1 of 3DP05 Demographic and Housing Estimates, 2006-2010 American Community Survey
Geographic Area:
Council District # 3
Subject EstimateEstimate
Margin of Error¹ PercentPercent
Margin of Error¹ Reliability²
High
High
Moderate
Moderate
Low
Low
Low
Low
Moderate
High
Moderate
Moderate
Moderate
Moderate
High
High
High
High
Moderate
Moderate
High
High
Moderate
Moderate
Moderate
High
High
High
Moderate
High
Moderate
Moderate
High
Low
High
High
Other Asian 1,290
Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander:
127
Native Hawaiian 41
Guamanian or Chamorro 49
Samoan 21
Other Pacific Islander 16
Some Other Race 2,257
Two or More Races: 3,745
White and Black or African American 738
White and American Indian and Alaska Native
745
White and Asian 927
Black or African American and American Indian and Alaska Native
305
White 60,133
Black or African American 13,085
American Indian and Alaska Native 2,422
Asian 9,181
Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander 453
Some Other Race 2,418
Hispanic or Latino of any race: 6,232
Mexican 3,829
Puerto Rican 482
Cuban 152
Other Hispanic or Latino 1,769
Not Hispanic or Latino: 77,043
White alone 53,763
Black or African American alone 11,066
American Indian and Alaska Native alone
693
Asian alone 7,659
Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander alone
109
Some other race alone 301
Two or more races: 3,452
Two races including Some other race 27
Two races excluding Some other race and Three or more races
3,425
Total Housing Units: 45,597
+/- 482
+/- 72
+/- 46
+/- 44
+/- 24
+/- 22
+/- 656
+/- 554
+/- 258
+/- 248
+/- 227
+/- 184
+/- 1,922
+/- 973
+/- 451
+/- 841
+/- 204
+/- 674
+/- 927
+/- 696
+/- 259
+/- 89
+/- 565
+/- 2,140
+/- 1,686
+/- 888
+/- 246
+/- 747
+/- 65
+/- 149
+/- 540
+/- 27
+/- 538
+/- 388
1.5%
0.2%
0.0%
0.1%
0.0%
0.0%
2.7%
4.5%
0.9%
0.9%
1.1%
0.4%
72.2%
15.7%
2.9%
11.0%
0.5%
2.9%
7.5%
4.6%
0.6%
0.2%
2.1%
92.5%
64.6%
13.3%
0.8%
9.2%
0.1%
0.4%
4.1%
0.0%
4.1%
100.0% X
+/- 0.6
+/-0.1
+/-0.1
+/-0.1
+/-0.1
+/-0.1
+/- 0.8
+/- 0.7
+/- 0.3
+/- 0.3
+/- 0.3
+/- 0.2
+/- 1.2
+/- 1.1
+/- 0.5
+/- 1
+/- 0.2
+/- 0.8
+/- 1.1
+/- 0.8
+/- 0.3
+/- 0.1
+/- 0.7
+/- 0.4
+/- 1
+/- 1
+/- 0.3
+/- 0.9
+/-0.1
+/- 0.2
+/- 0.6
+/-0.1
+/- 0.6
Total population: 83,275 +/- 2,284 X100.0%
Total population: 83,275 +/- 2,284 X100.0%
RACES ALONE OR IN COMBINATION WITH ONE OR MORE OTHER RACES
HOUSING
HISPANIC OR LATINO AND RACE
3 7/10/2014
Page 2 of 3DP05 Demographic and Housing Estimates, 2006-2010 American Community Survey
Geographic Area:
U.S. Census Bureau, 2006-2010 American Community Survey (ACS), 5-Year estimates
City of Seattle, Department of Planning and Development (DPD)On the Web at: http://www.seattle.gov/dpd/Research/Population_Demographics/Overview/
Supporting documentation on code lists, subject definitions, data accuracy, and statistical testing can be found on the American Community Survey website in the Data and Documentation section.
Sample size and data quality measures (including coverage rates, allocation rates, and response rates) can be found on the American Community Survey website in the Methodology section.
Although the American Community Survey (ACS) produces population, demographic and housing unit estimates, for 2010, the 2010 Census provides the official counts of the population and housing units for the nation, states, counties, cities and towns. For 2006 to 2009, the Population Estimates Program provides intercensal estimates of the population for the nation, states, and counties.
Data are based on a sample and are subject to sampling variability. The degree of uncertainty for an estimate arising from sampling variability is represented through the use of a margin of error. The value shown here is the 90 percent margin of error. The margin of error can be interpreted roughly as providing a 90 percent probability that the interval defined by the estimate minus the margin of error and the estimate plus the margin of error (the lower and upper confidence bounds) contains the true value. In addition to sampling variability, the ACS estimates are subject to nonsampling error (for a discussion of nonsampling variability, see Accuracy of the Data). The effect of nonsampling error is not represented in these tables.
While the 2006-2010 American Community Survey (ACS) data generally reflect the December 2009 Office of Management and Budget (OMB) definitions of metropolitan and micropolitan statistical areas; in certain instances the names, codes, and boundaries of the principal cities shown in ACS tables may differ from the OMB definitions due to differences in the effective dates of the geographic entities.
Estimates of urban and rural population, housing units, and characteristics reflect boundaries of urban areas defined based on Census 2000 data. Boundaries for urban areas have not been updated since Census 2000. As a result, data for urban and rural areas from the ACS do not necessarily reflect the results of ongoing urbanization.
Explanation of Symbols:1. An '**' entry in the margin of error column indicates that either no sample observations or too few sample observations were available to compute a standard error and thus the margin of error. A statistical test is not appropriate.2. An '-' entry in the estimate column indicates that either no sample observations or too few sample observations were available to compute an estimate, or a ratio of medians cannot be calculated because one or both of the median estimates falls in the lowest interval or upper interval of an open-ended distribution.3. An '-' following a median estimate means the median falls in the lowest interval of an open-ended distribution.4. An '+' following a median estimate means the median falls in the upper interval of an open-ended distribution.5. An '***' entry in the margin of error column indicates that the median falls in the lowest interval or upper interval of an open-ended distribution. A statistical test is not appropriate.6. An '*****' entry in the margin of error column indicates that the estimate is controlled. A statistical test for sampling variability is not appropriate.7. An 'N' entry in the estimate and margin of error columns indicates that data for this geographic area cannot be displayed because the number of sample cases is too small.8. An '(X)' means that the estimate is not applicable or not available."
This is one of four reports that have been adapted from the ACS "Data Profile" (DP) Series. The four DP tables published by the Census Bureau are: DP02 Selected Social Characteristics; DP03 Selected Economic Characteristics; DP04 Selected Housing Characteristics; DP05 Demographic and Housing Estimates.
DPD has adapted these DP tables for reporting ACS estimates for locally-defined geographies. The locally defined areas covered in these reports are made up of multiple census tracts (except for a few Community Reporting Areas that are made up of only one Census Tract each), therefore estimates shown for these geographies are based on aggregating estimates for multiple census tracts. For ease of calculation, medians are the average of the medians.
¹ The ACS is a sample survey and as such, estimates carry sampling error. Margins of error (MOEs) provide a measure of sampling error
The MOEs displayed for the aggregated estimates in these reports could only be approximated using the formulas provided by the Census Bureau. These formulas do not account for “covariance” (or inter-relationship) between the aggregated estimates, and can understate or—more commonly—overstate the margins of error. In some cases, actual MOEs may be much different than approximated. MOEs of +/- 0.1 and below are displayed as +/- 0.1 based on Census Bureau convention.
² The reliability indicator of High, Moderate, or Low is meant to provide a general sense of an estimate's reliability. Data users will need to use discretion in identifying the level of reliability appropriate for their purposes.
“High” reliability: MOE is less than or equal to 20% of the estimate. Indicates that sampling error is small relative to the size of the estimate. Flagged green."Moderate” reliability: MOE is between 20% and 66.7% of the estimate. Flagged yellow to indicate that the estimate should be used with caution."Low” reliability: MOE is over 66.7% of the estimate. Flagged red to warn that sampling error is large relative to the estimate and that the estimate is very unreliable."NC": Estimate is 0. Reliability cannot be calculated.
Percent Margin of Error "W" value indicates the standard formula for estimating the percent MOE could not be applied (due to negative value under square root).
For more about MOEs, see Census Bureau notes below. For formulas, see “American Community Survey Multiyear Accuracy of the Data (3-year 2008-2010 and 5-year 2006-2010),” http://www.census.gov/acs/www/Downloads/data_documentation/Accuracy/MultiyearACSAccuracyofData2010.pdf.)
Census Bureau notes for DP05:
"For more information on understanding race and Hispanic origin data, please see the Census 2010 Brief entitled, Overview of Race and Hispanic Origin: 2010, issued March 2011. (pdf format)
The ACS questions on Hispanic origin and race were revised in 2008 to make them consistent with the Census 2010 question wording. Any changes in estimates for 2008 and beyond may be due to demographic changes, as well as factors including questionnaire changes, differences in ACS population controls, and methodological differences in the population estimates, and therefore should be used with caution. For a summary of questionnaire changes see http://www.census.gov/acs/www/methodology/questionnaire_changes/. For more information about changes in the estimates see http://www.census.gov/population/www/socdemo/hispanic/reports.html.
Notes:
Source:
Produced by:
3 7/10/2014
Page 3 of 3DP05 Demographic and Housing Estimates, 2006-2010 American Community Survey
Geographic Area:
Demographic and Housing Estimates (DP05)2006-2010 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates (Not decennial census counts. See notes after table.)
Council District # 4
Subject EstimateEstimate
Margin of Error¹ PercentPercent
Margin of Error¹ Reliability²
High
High
High
High
High
High
Low
High
Low
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
Moderate
Low
NC
Low
NC
NC
Low
High
Moderate
High
Moderate
Moderate
Moderate
Moderate
Moderate
+/-123
+/- 21
Chippewa 0 0.0% +/-0.6
Navajo 13 0.0% +/-0.1
Total population: 85,846
Male 43,206
Female 42,640
Under 5 3,693
5 to 9 3,267
10 to 14 2,391
15 to 19 8,619
20 to 24 17,717
25 to 34 15,914
35 to 44 10,790
45 to 54 9,092
55 to 59 4,536
60 to 64 3,219
65 to 74 3,129
75 to 84 2,460
85 and over 1,019
Median Age 32.5
18 and over: 75,074
21 and over 63,173
62 and over 8,323
65 and over: 6,608
Male 37,745
Female 37,329
Male 2,744
Female 3,864
One Race 81,484
White 67,110
Black or African American 1,788
American Indian and Alaska Native: 446
Puget Sound Salish 14
Yakama 39
Cherokee 35
Sioux 0
Blackfeet 7
Tlingit-Haida 0
Asian: 11,200
Asian Indian 802
Chinese 3,787
Filipino 1,336
Japanese 1,226
Korean 2,037
Vietnamese 995
Other Asian 1,017
+/- 2,620
+/- 1,608
+/- 1,451
+/- 370
+/- 303
+/- 283
+/- 910
+/- 1,735
+/- 918
+/- 613
+/- 694
+/- 509
+/- 568
+/- 293
+/- 286
+/- 186
+/- 0.6
+/- 2,561
+/- 2,123
+/- 432
+/- 322
+/- 1,569
+/- 1,389
+/- 232
+/- 289
+/- 2,466
+/- 2,131
+/- 531
+/- 229
+/- 22
+/- 67
+/- 36
+/-123
+/- 11
+/-123
+/- 965
+/- 275
+/- 509
+/- 381
+/- 272
+/- 412
+/- 350
+/- 276
50.3%
49.7%
4.3%
3.8%
2.8%
10.0%
20.6%
18.5%
12.6%
10.6%
5.3%
3.7%
3.6%
2.9%
1.2%
87.5%
73.6%
9.7%
7.7%
50.3%
49.7%
41.5%
58.5%
94.9%
78.2%
2.1%
0.5%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
13.0%
0.9%
4.4%
1.6%
1.4%
2.4%
1.2%
1.2%
X
X X
100.0%
+/-1.1
+/- 0.7
+/- 0.4
+/- 0.3
+/- 0.3
+/- 1
+/- 1.9
+/- 0.9
+/- 0.6
+/- 0.7
+/- 0.6
+/- 0.7
+/- 0.3
+/- 0.3
+/- 0.2
+/- 1.3
+/- 1.2
+/- 0.7
+/- 1
+/- 0.4
+/- 0.3
+/- 2.9
+/- 3.3
W
+/- 0.7
+/- 0.6
+/- 0.3
+/-0.1
+/-0.1
+/-0.1
+/-0.6
+/-0.6
+/- 1.1
+/- 0.3
+/- 0.6
+/- 0.4
+/- 0.3
+/- 0.5
+/- 0.4
+/- 0.3
Total population: 85,846 +/- 2,620 X100.0%
Two or More Races 4,362 +/- 577 5.1% +/- 0.7
One Race: 81,484 +/- 2,466 94.9% W
SEX AND AGE
RACE
+/-0.1
High
Moderate
4 7/10/2014
Page 1 of 3DP05 Demographic and Housing Estimates, 2006-2010 American Community Survey
Geographic Area:
Council District # 4
Subject EstimateEstimate
Margin of Error¹ PercentPercent
Margin of Error¹ Reliability²
High
High
Moderate
Moderate
Low
Low
Low
Low
Moderate
High
Moderate
Moderate
High
Low
High
Moderate
Moderate
High
Moderate
Moderate
High
Moderate
Low
Low
Moderate
High
High
Moderate
Moderate
High
Low
Low
High
Low
High
High
Other Asian 1,017
Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander:
194
Native Hawaiian 91
Guamanian or Chamorro 73
Samoan 12
Other Pacific Islander 18
Some Other Race 746
Two or More Races: 4,362
White and Black or African American 456
White and American Indian and Alaska Native
814
White and Asian 1,920
Black or African American and American Indian and Alaska Native
76
White 71,047
Black or African American 2,595
American Indian and Alaska Native 1,583
Asian 13,770
Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander 682
Some Other Race 1,019
Hispanic or Latino of any race: 2,606
Mexican 1,359
Puerto Rican 90
Cuban 64
Other Hispanic or Latino 1,093
Not Hispanic or Latino: 83,240
White alone 65,710
Black or African American alone 1,762
American Indian and Alaska Native alone
335
Asian alone 11,109
Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander alone
188
Some other race alone 50
Two or more races: 4,086
Two races including Some other race 29
Two races excluding Some other race and Three or more races
4,057
Total Housing Units: 38,534
+/- 276
+/- 126
+/- 93
+/- 79
+/- 19
+/- 30
+/- 236
+/- 577
+/- 171
+/- 271
+/- 347
+/- 86
+/- 2,257
+/- 531
+/- 402
+/- 1,097
+/- 292
+/- 273
+/- 487
+/- 380
+/- 83
+/- 64
+/- 283
+/- 2,587
+/- 2,118
+/- 445
+/- 181
+/- 961
+/- 126
+/- 58
+/- 563
+/- 34
+/- 561
+/- 315
1.2%
0.2%
0.1%
0.1%
0.0%
0.0%
0.9%
5.1%
0.5%
0.9%
2.2%
0.1%
82.8%
3.0%
1.8%
16.0%
0.8%
1.2%
3.0%
1.6%
0.1%
0.1%
1.3%
97.0%
76.5%
2.1%
0.4%
12.9%
0.2%
0.1%
4.8%
0.0%
4.7%
100.0% X
+/- 0.3
+/- 0.1
+/- 0.1
+/-0.1
+/-0.1
+/-0.1
+/- 0.3
+/- 0.7
+/- 0.2
+/- 0.3
+/- 0.4
+/- 0.1
+/- 0.7
+/- 0.6
+/- 0.5
+/- 1.2
+/- 0.3
+/- 0.3
+/- 0.6
+/- 0.4
+/-0.1
+/-0.1
+/- 0.3
+/- 0.6
+/- 0.8
+/- 0.5
+/- 0.2
+/- 1
+/- 0.1
+/-0.1
+/- 0.6
+/-0.1
+/- 0.6
Total population: 85,846 +/- 2,620 X100.0%
Total population: 85,846 +/- 2,620 X100.0%
RACES ALONE OR IN COMBINATION WITH ONE OR MORE OTHER RACES
HOUSING
HISPANIC OR LATINO AND RACE
4 7/10/2014
Page 2 of 3DP05 Demographic and Housing Estimates, 2006-2010 American Community Survey
Geographic Area:
U.S. Census Bureau, 2006-2010 American Community Survey (ACS), 5-Year estimates
City of Seattle, Department of Planning and Development (DPD)On the Web at: http://www.seattle.gov/dpd/Research/Population_Demographics/Overview/
Supporting documentation on code lists, subject definitions, data accuracy, and statistical testing can be found on the American Community Survey website in the Data and Documentation section.
Sample size and data quality measures (including coverage rates, allocation rates, and response rates) can be found on the American Community Survey website in the Methodology section.
Although the American Community Survey (ACS) produces population, demographic and housing unit estimates, for 2010, the 2010 Census provides the official counts of the population and housing units for the nation, states, counties, cities and towns. For 2006 to 2009, the Population Estimates Program provides intercensal estimates of the population for the nation, states, and counties.
Data are based on a sample and are subject to sampling variability. The degree of uncertainty for an estimate arising from sampling variability is represented through the use of a margin of error. The value shown here is the 90 percent margin of error. The margin of error can be interpreted roughly as providing a 90 percent probability that the interval defined by the estimate minus the margin of error and the estimate plus the margin of error (the lower and upper confidence bounds) contains the true value. In addition to sampling variability, the ACS estimates are subject to nonsampling error (for a discussion of nonsampling variability, see Accuracy of the Data). The effect of nonsampling error is not represented in these tables.
While the 2006-2010 American Community Survey (ACS) data generally reflect the December 2009 Office of Management and Budget (OMB) definitions of metropolitan and micropolitan statistical areas; in certain instances the names, codes, and boundaries of the principal cities shown in ACS tables may differ from the OMB definitions due to differences in the effective dates of the geographic entities.
Estimates of urban and rural population, housing units, and characteristics reflect boundaries of urban areas defined based on Census 2000 data. Boundaries for urban areas have not been updated since Census 2000. As a result, data for urban and rural areas from the ACS do not necessarily reflect the results of ongoing urbanization.
Explanation of Symbols:1. An '**' entry in the margin of error column indicates that either no sample observations or too few sample observations were available to compute a standard error and thus the margin of error. A statistical test is not appropriate.2. An '-' entry in the estimate column indicates that either no sample observations or too few sample observations were available to compute an estimate, or a ratio of medians cannot be calculated because one or both of the median estimates falls in the lowest interval or upper interval of an open-ended distribution.3. An '-' following a median estimate means the median falls in the lowest interval of an open-ended distribution.4. An '+' following a median estimate means the median falls in the upper interval of an open-ended distribution.5. An '***' entry in the margin of error column indicates that the median falls in the lowest interval or upper interval of an open-ended distribution. A statistical test is not appropriate.6. An '*****' entry in the margin of error column indicates that the estimate is controlled. A statistical test for sampling variability is not appropriate.7. An 'N' entry in the estimate and margin of error columns indicates that data for this geographic area cannot be displayed because the number of sample cases is too small.8. An '(X)' means that the estimate is not applicable or not available."
This is one of four reports that have been adapted from the ACS "Data Profile" (DP) Series. The four DP tables published by the Census Bureau are: DP02 Selected Social Characteristics; DP03 Selected Economic Characteristics; DP04 Selected Housing Characteristics; DP05 Demographic and Housing Estimates.
DPD has adapted these DP tables for reporting ACS estimates for locally-defined geographies. The locally defined areas covered in these reports are made up of multiple census tracts (except for a few Community Reporting Areas that are made up of only one Census Tract each), therefore estimates shown for these geographies are based on aggregating estimates for multiple census tracts. For ease of calculation, medians are the average of the medians.
¹ The ACS is a sample survey and as such, estimates carry sampling error. Margins of error (MOEs) provide a measure of sampling error
The MOEs displayed for the aggregated estimates in these reports could only be approximated using the formulas provided by the Census Bureau. These formulas do not account for “covariance” (or inter-relationship) between the aggregated estimates, and can understate or—more commonly—overstate the margins of error. In some cases, actual MOEs may be much different than approximated. MOEs of +/- 0.1 and below are displayed as +/- 0.1 based on Census Bureau convention.
² The reliability indicator of High, Moderate, or Low is meant to provide a general sense of an estimate's reliability. Data users will need to use discretion in identifying the level of reliability appropriate for their purposes.
“High” reliability: MOE is less than or equal to 20% of the estimate. Indicates that sampling error is small relative to the size of the estimate. Flagged green."Moderate” reliability: MOE is between 20% and 66.7% of the estimate. Flagged yellow to indicate that the estimate should be used with caution."Low” reliability: MOE is over 66.7% of the estimate. Flagged red to warn that sampling error is large relative to the estimate and that the estimate is very unreliable."NC": Estimate is 0. Reliability cannot be calculated.
Percent Margin of Error "W" value indicates the standard formula for estimating the percent MOE could not be applied (due to negative value under square root).
For more about MOEs, see Census Bureau notes below. For formulas, see “American Community Survey Multiyear Accuracy of the Data (3-year 2008-2010 and 5-year 2006-2010),” http://www.census.gov/acs/www/Downloads/data_documentation/Accuracy/MultiyearACSAccuracyofData2010.pdf.)
Census Bureau notes for DP05:
"For more information on understanding race and Hispanic origin data, please see the Census 2010 Brief entitled, Overview of Race and Hispanic Origin: 2010, issued March 2011. (pdf format)
The ACS questions on Hispanic origin and race were revised in 2008 to make them consistent with the Census 2010 question wording. Any changes in estimates for 2008 and beyond may be due to demographic changes, as well as factors including questionnaire changes, differences in ACS population controls, and methodological differences in the population estimates, and therefore should be used with caution. For a summary of questionnaire changes see http://www.census.gov/acs/www/methodology/questionnaire_changes/. For more information about changes in the estimates see http://www.census.gov/population/www/socdemo/hispanic/reports.html.
Notes:
Source:
Produced by:
4 7/10/2014
Page 3 of 3DP05 Demographic and Housing Estimates, 2006-2010 American Community Survey
Geographic Area:
Demographic and Housing Estimates (DP05)2006-2010 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates (Not decennial census counts. See notes after table.)
Council District # 5
Subject EstimateEstimate
Margin of Error¹ PercentPercent
Margin of Error¹ Reliability²
High
High
High
High
High
High
Low
High
Low
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
Low
Low
Low
Low
NC
NC
High
Moderate
High
Moderate
Moderate
Moderate
Moderate
Moderate
+/- 51
+/- 18
Chippewa 60 0.1% +/-0.1
Navajo 10 0.0% +/-0.1
Total population: 89,709
Male 44,091
Female 45,618
Under 5 4,276
5 to 9 4,193
10 to 14 3,298
15 to 19 4,093
20 to 24 6,306
25 to 34 18,322
35 to 44 13,065
45 to 54 13,195
55 to 59 6,833
60 to 64 4,253
65 to 74 5,106
75 to 84 4,136
85 and over 2,633
Median Age 38.9
18 and over: 75,546
21 and over 72,892
62 and over 14,066
65 and over: 11,875
Male 36,984
Female 38,562
Male 4,625
Female 7,250
One Race 85,186
White 64,526
Black or African American 5,390
American Indian and Alaska Native: 970
Puget Sound Salish 149
Yakama 0
Cherokee 75
Sioux 0
Blackfeet 37
Tlingit-Haida 20
Asian: 11,607
Asian Indian 858
Chinese 4,506
Filipino 2,211
Japanese 971
Korean 921
Vietnamese 1,036
Other Asian 1,104
+/- 1,733
+/- 1,248
+/- 1,202
+/- 478
+/- 463
+/- 388
+/- 500
+/- 639
+/- 1,047
+/- 754
+/- 737
+/- 573
+/- 424
+/- 444
+/- 401
+/- 323
+/- 0.6
+/- 1,431
+/- 1,393
+/- 576
+/- 517
+/- 1,091
+/- 948
+/- 349
+/- 410
+/- 1,738
+/- 1,708
+/- 1,058
+/- 321
+/- 126
+/-123
+/- 103
+/-123
+/- 34
+/- 36
+/- 878
+/- 295
+/- 662
+/- 492
+/- 254
+/- 276
+/- 329
+/- 332
49.1%
50.9%
4.8%
4.7%
3.7%
4.6%
7.0%
20.4%
14.6%
14.7%
7.6%
4.7%
5.7%
4.6%
2.9%
84.2%
81.3%
15.7%
13.2%
49.0%
51.0%
38.9%
61.1%
95.0%
71.9%
6.0%
1.1%
0.2%
0.0%
0.1%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
12.9%
1.0%
5.0%
2.5%
1.1%
1.0%
1.2%
1.2%
X
X X
100.0%
+/-1
+/- 0.9
+/- 0.5
+/- 0.5
+/- 0.4
+/- 0.6
+/- 0.7
+/- 1.1
+/- 0.8
+/- 0.8
+/- 0.6
+/- 0.5
+/- 0.5
+/- 0.4
+/- 0.4
W
+/- 1.1
+/- 0.8
W
+/- 0.6
+/- 0.5
+/- 2.4
+/- 2.2
+/- 0.6
+/- 1.3
+/- 1.2
+/- 0.4
+/- 0.1
+/-0.6
+/- 0.1
+/-0.6
+/-0.1
+/- 0.9
+/- 0.3
+/- 0.7
+/- 0.5
+/- 0.3
+/- 0.3
+/- 0.4
+/- 0.4
Total population: 89,709 +/- 1,733 X100.0%
Two or More Races 4,523 +/- 589 5.0% +/- 0.6
One Race: 85,186 +/- 1,738 95.0% +/- 0.6
SEX AND AGE
RACE
+/-0.1
High
Moderate
5 7/10/2014
Page 1 of 3DP05 Demographic and Housing Estimates, 2006-2010 American Community Survey
Geographic Area:
Council District # 5
Subject EstimateEstimate
Margin of Error¹ PercentPercent
Margin of Error¹ Reliability²
High
High
Moderate
Moderate
Low
Low
Low
Low
Moderate
High
Moderate
Moderate
High
Low
High
High
Moderate
High
Moderate
Moderate
High
Moderate
Moderate
Low
Moderate
High
High
High
Moderate
High
Moderate
Moderate
High
Low
High
High
Other Asian 1,104
Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander:
643
Native Hawaiian 96
Guamanian or Chamorro 63
Samoan 354
Other Pacific Islander 130
Some Other Race 2,050
Two or More Races: 4,523
White and Black or African American 674
White and American Indian and Alaska Native
833
White and Asian 1,913
Black or African American and American Indian and Alaska Native
89
White 68,626
Black or African American 6,443
American Indian and Alaska Native 2,128
Asian 14,048
Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander 1,049
Some Other Race 2,468
Hispanic or Latino of any race: 6,307
Mexican 4,045
Puerto Rican 308
Cuban 147
Other Hispanic or Latino 1,807
Not Hispanic or Latino: 83,402
White alone 61,075
Black or African American alone 5,054
American Indian and Alaska Native alone
801
Asian alone 11,554
Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander alone
589
Some other race alone 325
Two or more races: 4,004
Two races including Some other race 89
Two races excluding Some other race and Three or more races
3,915
Total Housing Units: 45,335
+/- 332
+/- 310
+/- 83
+/- 86
+/- 262
+/- 124
+/- 561
+/- 589
+/- 278
+/- 228
+/- 371
+/- 77
+/- 1,700
+/- 1,058
+/- 426
+/- 1,002
+/- 361
+/- 590
+/- 996
+/- 850
+/- 176
+/- 120
+/- 482
+/- 1,633
+/- 1,597
+/- 942
+/- 275
+/- 877
+/- 284
+/- 206
+/- 543
+/- 80
+/- 536
+/- 327
1.2%
0.7%
0.1%
0.1%
0.4%
0.1%
2.3%
5.0%
0.8%
0.9%
2.1%
0.1%
76.5%
7.2%
2.4%
15.7%
1.2%
2.8%
7.0%
4.5%
0.3%
0.2%
2.0%
93.0%
68.1%
5.6%
0.9%
12.9%
0.7%
0.4%
4.5%
0.1%
4.4%
100.0% X
+/- 0.4
+/- 0.3
+/-0.1
+/-0.1
+/- 0.3
+/- 0.1
+/- 0.6
+/- 0.6
+/- 0.3
+/- 0.3
+/- 0.4
+/-0.1
+/- 1.2
+/- 1.2
+/- 0.5
+/- 1.1
+/- 0.4
+/- 0.7
+/- 1.1
+/- 0.9
+/- 0.2
+/- 0.1
+/- 0.5
+/- 0.3
+/- 1.2
+/- 1
+/- 0.3
+/- 0.9
+/- 0.3
+/- 0.2
+/- 0.6
+/-0.1
+/- 0.6
Total population: 89,709 +/- 1,733 X100.0%
Total population: 89,709 +/- 1,733 X100.0%
RACES ALONE OR IN COMBINATION WITH ONE OR MORE OTHER RACES
HOUSING
HISPANIC OR LATINO AND RACE
5 7/10/2014
Page 2 of 3DP05 Demographic and Housing Estimates, 2006-2010 American Community Survey
Geographic Area:
U.S. Census Bureau, 2006-2010 American Community Survey (ACS), 5-Year estimates
City of Seattle, Department of Planning and Development (DPD)On the Web at: http://www.seattle.gov/dpd/Research/Population_Demographics/Overview/
Supporting documentation on code lists, subject definitions, data accuracy, and statistical testing can be found on the American Community Survey website in the Data and Documentation section.
Sample size and data quality measures (including coverage rates, allocation rates, and response rates) can be found on the American Community Survey website in the Methodology section.
Although the American Community Survey (ACS) produces population, demographic and housing unit estimates, for 2010, the 2010 Census provides the official counts of the population and housing units for the nation, states, counties, cities and towns. For 2006 to 2009, the Population Estimates Program provides intercensal estimates of the population for the nation, states, and counties.
Data are based on a sample and are subject to sampling variability. The degree of uncertainty for an estimate arising from sampling variability is represented through the use of a margin of error. The value shown here is the 90 percent margin of error. The margin of error can be interpreted roughly as providing a 90 percent probability that the interval defined by the estimate minus the margin of error and the estimate plus the margin of error (the lower and upper confidence bounds) contains the true value. In addition to sampling variability, the ACS estimates are subject to nonsampling error (for a discussion of nonsampling variability, see Accuracy of the Data). The effect of nonsampling error is not represented in these tables.
While the 2006-2010 American Community Survey (ACS) data generally reflect the December 2009 Office of Management and Budget (OMB) definitions of metropolitan and micropolitan statistical areas; in certain instances the names, codes, and boundaries of the principal cities shown in ACS tables may differ from the OMB definitions due to differences in the effective dates of the geographic entities.
Estimates of urban and rural population, housing units, and characteristics reflect boundaries of urban areas defined based on Census 2000 data. Boundaries for urban areas have not been updated since Census 2000. As a result, data for urban and rural areas from the ACS do not necessarily reflect the results of ongoing urbanization.
Explanation of Symbols:1. An '**' entry in the margin of error column indicates that either no sample observations or too few sample observations were available to compute a standard error and thus the margin of error. A statistical test is not appropriate.2. An '-' entry in the estimate column indicates that either no sample observations or too few sample observations were available to compute an estimate, or a ratio of medians cannot be calculated because one or both of the median estimates falls in the lowest interval or upper interval of an open-ended distribution.3. An '-' following a median estimate means the median falls in the lowest interval of an open-ended distribution.4. An '+' following a median estimate means the median falls in the upper interval of an open-ended distribution.5. An '***' entry in the margin of error column indicates that the median falls in the lowest interval or upper interval of an open-ended distribution. A statistical test is not appropriate.6. An '*****' entry in the margin of error column indicates that the estimate is controlled. A statistical test for sampling variability is not appropriate.7. An 'N' entry in the estimate and margin of error columns indicates that data for this geographic area cannot be displayed because the number of sample cases is too small.8. An '(X)' means that the estimate is not applicable or not available."
This is one of four reports that have been adapted from the ACS "Data Profile" (DP) Series. The four DP tables published by the Census Bureau are: DP02 Selected Social Characteristics; DP03 Selected Economic Characteristics; DP04 Selected Housing Characteristics; DP05 Demographic and Housing Estimates.
DPD has adapted these DP tables for reporting ACS estimates for locally-defined geographies. The locally defined areas covered in these reports are made up of multiple census tracts (except for a few Community Reporting Areas that are made up of only one Census Tract each), therefore estimates shown for these geographies are based on aggregating estimates for multiple census tracts. For ease of calculation, medians are the average of the medians.
¹ The ACS is a sample survey and as such, estimates carry sampling error. Margins of error (MOEs) provide a measure of sampling error
The MOEs displayed for the aggregated estimates in these reports could only be approximated using the formulas provided by the Census Bureau. These formulas do not account for “covariance” (or inter-relationship) between the aggregated estimates, and can understate or—more commonly—overstate the margins of error. In some cases, actual MOEs may be much different than approximated. MOEs of +/- 0.1 and below are displayed as +/- 0.1 based on Census Bureau convention.
² The reliability indicator of High, Moderate, or Low is meant to provide a general sense of an estimate's reliability. Data users will need to use discretion in identifying the level of reliability appropriate for their purposes.
“High” reliability: MOE is less than or equal to 20% of the estimate. Indicates that sampling error is small relative to the size of the estimate. Flagged green."Moderate” reliability: MOE is between 20% and 66.7% of the estimate. Flagged yellow to indicate that the estimate should be used with caution."Low” reliability: MOE is over 66.7% of the estimate. Flagged red to warn that sampling error is large relative to the estimate and that the estimate is very unreliable."NC": Estimate is 0. Reliability cannot be calculated.
Percent Margin of Error "W" value indicates the standard formula for estimating the percent MOE could not be applied (due to negative value under square root).
For more about MOEs, see Census Bureau notes below. For formulas, see “American Community Survey Multiyear Accuracy of the Data (3-year 2008-2010 and 5-year 2006-2010),” http://www.census.gov/acs/www/Downloads/data_documentation/Accuracy/MultiyearACSAccuracyofData2010.pdf.)
Census Bureau notes for DP05:
"For more information on understanding race and Hispanic origin data, please see the Census 2010 Brief entitled, Overview of Race and Hispanic Origin: 2010, issued March 2011. (pdf format)
The ACS questions on Hispanic origin and race were revised in 2008 to make them consistent with the Census 2010 question wording. Any changes in estimates for 2008 and beyond may be due to demographic changes, as well as factors including questionnaire changes, differences in ACS population controls, and methodological differences in the population estimates, and therefore should be used with caution. For a summary of questionnaire changes see http://www.census.gov/acs/www/methodology/questionnaire_changes/. For more information about changes in the estimates see http://www.census.gov/population/www/socdemo/hispanic/reports.html.
Notes:
Source:
Produced by:
5 7/10/2014
Page 3 of 3DP05 Demographic and Housing Estimates, 2006-2010 American Community Survey
Geographic Area:
Demographic and Housing Estimates (DP05)2006-2010 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates (Not decennial census counts. See notes after table.)
Council District # 6
Subject EstimateEstimate
Margin of Error¹ PercentPercent
Margin of Error¹ Reliability²
High
High
High
High
High
High
Low
High
NC
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
Moderate
NC
Low
NC
Low
NC
NC
High
Moderate
Moderate
Moderate
Moderate
Moderate
Moderate
Moderate
+/- 21
+/-123
Chippewa 14 0.0% +/-0.1
Navajo 0 0.0% +/-0.6
Total population: 83,909
Male 41,327
Female 42,582
Under 5 4,428
5 to 9 3,530
10 to 14 2,904
15 to 19 2,627
20 to 24 4,719
25 to 34 19,211
35 to 44 16,059
45 to 54 12,704
55 to 59 6,014
60 to 64 4,055
65 to 74 3,428
75 to 84 2,663
85 and over 1,567
Median Age 38.0
18 and over: 71,325
21 and over 69,881
62 and over 9,940
65 and over: 7,658
Male 35,331
Female 35,994
Male 3,327
Female 4,331
One Race 80,260
White 72,761
Black or African American 1,111
American Indian and Alaska Native: 428
Puget Sound Salish 0
Yakama 0
Cherokee 0
Sioux 0
Blackfeet 27
Tlingit-Haida 101
Asian: 4,658
Asian Indian 315
Chinese 1,237
Filipino 707
Japanese 762
Korean 983
Vietnamese 226
Other Asian 428
+/- 1,555
+/- 1,120
+/- 1,050
+/- 458
+/- 364
+/- 354
+/- 356
+/- 641
+/- 1,054
+/- 725
+/- 675
+/- 471
+/- 394
+/- 365
+/- 312
+/- 255
+/- 0.6
+/- 1,308
+/- 1,280
+/- 540
+/- 445
+/- 983
+/- 868
+/- 334
+/- 348
+/- 1,518
+/- 1,460
+/- 640
+/- 197
+/-123
+/-123
+/-123
+/-123
+/- 42
+/- 74
+/- 571
+/- 152
+/- 306
+/- 231
+/- 206
+/- 324
+/- 118
+/- 178
49.3%
50.7%
5.3%
4.2%
3.5%
3.1%
5.6%
22.9%
19.1%
15.1%
7.2%
4.8%
4.1%
3.2%
1.9%
85.0%
83.3%
11.8%
9.1%
49.5%
50.5%
43.4%
56.6%
95.7%
86.7%
1.3%
0.5%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.1%
5.6%
0.4%
1.5%
0.8%
0.9%
1.2%
0.3%
0.5%
X
X X
100.0%
+/-1
+/- 0.8
+/- 0.5
+/- 0.4
+/- 0.4
+/- 0.4
+/- 0.8
+/- 1.2
+/- 0.8
+/- 0.8
+/- 0.5
+/- 0.5
+/- 0.4
+/- 0.4
+/- 0.3
W
+/- 1
+/- 0.8
W
+/- 0.6
+/- 0.5
+/- 3.6
+/- 3.1
+/- 0.4
+/- 0.7
+/- 0.8
+/- 0.2
+/-0.6
+/-0.6
+/-0.6
+/-0.6
+/-0.1
+/- 0.7
+/- 0.2
+/- 0.4
+/- 0.3
+/- 0.2
+/- 0.4
+/- 0.1
+/- 0.2
Total population: 83,909 +/- 1,555 X100.0%
Two or More Races 3,649 +/- 641 4.3% +/- 0.8
One Race: 80,260 +/- 1,518 95.7% +/- 0.4
SEX AND AGE
RACE
+/-0.1
High
Moderate
6 7/10/2014
Page 1 of 3DP05 Demographic and Housing Estimates, 2006-2010 American Community Survey
Geographic Area:
Council District # 6
Subject EstimateEstimate
Margin of Error¹ PercentPercent
Margin of Error¹ Reliability²
High
High
Moderate
Low
NC
Low
NC
NC
Moderate
High
Moderate
Moderate
Moderate
NC
High
Moderate
Moderate
High
Moderate
Moderate
High
Moderate
Moderate
Moderate
Moderate
High
High
Moderate
Moderate
High
Low
Moderate
High
Low
High
High
Other Asian 428
Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander:
37
Native Hawaiian 0
Guamanian or Chamorro 37
Samoan 0
Other Pacific Islander 0
Some Other Race 1,265
Two or More Races: 3,649
White and Black or African American 825
White and American Indian and Alaska Native
674
White and Asian 1,645
Black or African American and American Indian and Alaska Native
0
White 76,250
Black or African American 2,084
American Indian and Alaska Native 1,177
Asian 6,439
Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander 133
Some Other Race 1,545
Hispanic or Latino of any race: 4,031
Mexican 2,183
Puerto Rican 130
Cuban 147
Other Hispanic or Latino 1,571
Not Hispanic or Latino: 79,878
White alone 70,423
Black or African American alone 1,111
American Indian and Alaska Native alone
246
Asian alone 4,620
Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander alone
24
Some other race alone 290
Two or more races: 3,164
Two races including Some other race 14
Two races excluding Some other race and Three or more races
3,150
Total Housing Units: 43,347
+/- 178
+/- 47
+/-123
+/- 47
+/-123
+/-123
+/- 430
+/- 641
+/- 380
+/- 236
+/- 410
+/-123
+/- 1,455
+/- 640
+/- 340
+/- 767
+/- 84
+/- 462
+/- 667
+/- 519
+/- 83
+/- 85
+/- 417
+/- 1,557
+/- 1,447
+/- 416
+/- 115
+/- 570
+/- 41
+/- 123
+/- 590
+/- 21
+/- 590
+/- 298
0.5%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.5%
4.3%
1.0%
0.8%
2.0%
0.0%
90.9%
2.5%
1.4%
7.7%
0.2%
1.8%
4.8%
2.6%
0.2%
0.2%
1.9%
95.2%
83.9%
1.3%
0.3%
5.5%
0.0%
0.3%
3.8%
0.0%
3.8%
100.0% X
+/- 0.2
+/-0.1
+/-0.6
+/-0.1
+/-0.6
+/-0.6
+/- 0.5
+/- 0.8
+/- 0.5
+/- 0.3
+/- 0.5
+/-0.6
+/- 0.4
+/- 0.8
+/- 0.4
+/- 0.9
+/- 0.1
+/- 0.5
+/- 0.8
+/- 0.6
+/-0.1
+/- 0.1
+/- 0.5
+/- 0.6
+/- 0.7
+/- 0.5
+/- 0.1
+/- 0.7
+/-0.1
+/- 0.1
+/- 0.7
+/-0.1
+/- 0.7
Total population: 83,909 +/- 1,555 X100.0%
Total population: 83,909 +/- 1,555 X100.0%
RACES ALONE OR IN COMBINATION WITH ONE OR MORE OTHER RACES
HOUSING
HISPANIC OR LATINO AND RACE
6 7/10/2014
Page 2 of 3DP05 Demographic and Housing Estimates, 2006-2010 American Community Survey
Geographic Area:
U.S. Census Bureau, 2006-2010 American Community Survey (ACS), 5-Year estimates
City of Seattle, Department of Planning and Development (DPD)On the Web at: http://www.seattle.gov/dpd/Research/Population_Demographics/Overview/
Supporting documentation on code lists, subject definitions, data accuracy, and statistical testing can be found on the American Community Survey website in the Data and Documentation section.
Sample size and data quality measures (including coverage rates, allocation rates, and response rates) can be found on the American Community Survey website in the Methodology section.
Although the American Community Survey (ACS) produces population, demographic and housing unit estimates, for 2010, the 2010 Census provides the official counts of the population and housing units for the nation, states, counties, cities and towns. For 2006 to 2009, the Population Estimates Program provides intercensal estimates of the population for the nation, states, and counties.
Data are based on a sample and are subject to sampling variability. The degree of uncertainty for an estimate arising from sampling variability is represented through the use of a margin of error. The value shown here is the 90 percent margin of error. The margin of error can be interpreted roughly as providing a 90 percent probability that the interval defined by the estimate minus the margin of error and the estimate plus the margin of error (the lower and upper confidence bounds) contains the true value. In addition to sampling variability, the ACS estimates are subject to nonsampling error (for a discussion of nonsampling variability, see Accuracy of the Data). The effect of nonsampling error is not represented in these tables.
While the 2006-2010 American Community Survey (ACS) data generally reflect the December 2009 Office of Management and Budget (OMB) definitions of metropolitan and micropolitan statistical areas; in certain instances the names, codes, and boundaries of the principal cities shown in ACS tables may differ from the OMB definitions due to differences in the effective dates of the geographic entities.
Estimates of urban and rural population, housing units, and characteristics reflect boundaries of urban areas defined based on Census 2000 data. Boundaries for urban areas have not been updated since Census 2000. As a result, data for urban and rural areas from the ACS do not necessarily reflect the results of ongoing urbanization.
Explanation of Symbols:1. An '**' entry in the margin of error column indicates that either no sample observations or too few sample observations were available to compute a standard error and thus the margin of error. A statistical test is not appropriate.2. An '-' entry in the estimate column indicates that either no sample observations or too few sample observations were available to compute an estimate, or a ratio of medians cannot be calculated because one or both of the median estimates falls in the lowest interval or upper interval of an open-ended distribution.3. An '-' following a median estimate means the median falls in the lowest interval of an open-ended distribution.4. An '+' following a median estimate means the median falls in the upper interval of an open-ended distribution.5. An '***' entry in the margin of error column indicates that the median falls in the lowest interval or upper interval of an open-ended distribution. A statistical test is not appropriate.6. An '*****' entry in the margin of error column indicates that the estimate is controlled. A statistical test for sampling variability is not appropriate.7. An 'N' entry in the estimate and margin of error columns indicates that data for this geographic area cannot be displayed because the number of sample cases is too small.8. An '(X)' means that the estimate is not applicable or not available."
This is one of four reports that have been adapted from the ACS "Data Profile" (DP) Series. The four DP tables published by the Census Bureau are: DP02 Selected Social Characteristics; DP03 Selected Economic Characteristics; DP04 Selected Housing Characteristics; DP05 Demographic and Housing Estimates.
DPD has adapted these DP tables for reporting ACS estimates for locally-defined geographies. The locally defined areas covered in these reports are made up of multiple census tracts (except for a few Community Reporting Areas that are made up of only one Census Tract each), therefore estimates shown for these geographies are based on aggregating estimates for multiple census tracts. For ease of calculation, medians are the average of the medians.
¹ The ACS is a sample survey and as such, estimates carry sampling error. Margins of error (MOEs) provide a measure of sampling error
The MOEs displayed for the aggregated estimates in these reports could only be approximated using the formulas provided by the Census Bureau. These formulas do not account for “covariance” (or inter-relationship) between the aggregated estimates, and can understate or—more commonly—overstate the margins of error. In some cases, actual MOEs may be much different than approximated. MOEs of +/- 0.1 and below are displayed as +/- 0.1 based on Census Bureau convention.
² The reliability indicator of High, Moderate, or Low is meant to provide a general sense of an estimate's reliability. Data users will need to use discretion in identifying the level of reliability appropriate for their purposes.
“High” reliability: MOE is less than or equal to 20% of the estimate. Indicates that sampling error is small relative to the size of the estimate. Flagged green."Moderate” reliability: MOE is between 20% and 66.7% of the estimate. Flagged yellow to indicate that the estimate should be used with caution."Low” reliability: MOE is over 66.7% of the estimate. Flagged red to warn that sampling error is large relative to the estimate and that the estimate is very unreliable."NC": Estimate is 0. Reliability cannot be calculated.
Percent Margin of Error "W" value indicates the standard formula for estimating the percent MOE could not be applied (due to negative value under square root).
For more about MOEs, see Census Bureau notes below. For formulas, see “American Community Survey Multiyear Accuracy of the Data (3-year 2008-2010 and 5-year 2006-2010),” http://www.census.gov/acs/www/Downloads/data_documentation/Accuracy/MultiyearACSAccuracyofData2010.pdf.)
Census Bureau notes for DP05:
"For more information on understanding race and Hispanic origin data, please see the Census 2010 Brief entitled, Overview of Race and Hispanic Origin: 2010, issued March 2011. (pdf format)
The ACS questions on Hispanic origin and race were revised in 2008 to make them consistent with the Census 2010 question wording. Any changes in estimates for 2008 and beyond may be due to demographic changes, as well as factors including questionnaire changes, differences in ACS population controls, and methodological differences in the population estimates, and therefore should be used with caution. For a summary of questionnaire changes see http://www.census.gov/acs/www/methodology/questionnaire_changes/. For more information about changes in the estimates see http://www.census.gov/population/www/socdemo/hispanic/reports.html.
Notes:
Source:
Produced by:
6 7/10/2014
Page 3 of 3DP05 Demographic and Housing Estimates, 2006-2010 American Community Survey
Geographic Area:
Demographic and Housing Estimates (DP05)2006-2010 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates (Not decennial census counts. See notes after table.)
Council District # 7
Subject EstimateEstimate
Margin of Error¹ PercentPercent
Margin of Error¹ Reliability²
High
High
High
High
High
High
NC
High
Low
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
High
NC
Low
Low
Low
Low
NC
High
Moderate
High
Moderate
Moderate
Moderate
Moderate
Moderate
+/- 21
+/- 21
Chippewa 12 0.0% +/-0.1
Navajo 13 0.0% +/-0.1
Total population: 83,463
Male 42,497
Female 40,966
Under 5 3,028
5 to 9 2,326
10 to 14 1,672
15 to 19 3,093
20 to 24 6,937
25 to 34 20,800
35 to 44 14,922
45 to 54 11,550
55 to 59 5,341
60 to 64 4,374
65 to 74 4,433
75 to 84 3,355
85 and over 1,632
Median Age 38.4
18 and over: 75,419
21 and over 72,208
62 and over 11,968
65 and over: 9,420
Male 38,404
Female 37,015
Male 4,117
Female 5,303
One Race 80,376
White 67,798
Black or African American 3,189
American Indian and Alaska Native: 692
Puget Sound Salish 51
Yakama 0
Cherokee 0
Sioux 32
Blackfeet 0
Tlingit-Haida 32
Asian: 7,248
Asian Indian 941
Chinese 1,701
Filipino 1,282
Japanese 884
Korean 910
Vietnamese 510
Other Asian 1,020
+/- 2,002
+/- 1,515
+/- 1,224
+/- 389
+/- 277
+/- 289
+/- 549
+/- 938
+/- 1,090
+/- 897
+/- 721
+/- 494
+/- 442
+/- 421
+/- 383
+/- 278
+/- 0.7
+/- 1,901
+/- 1,756
+/- 623
+/- 519
+/- 1,458
+/- 1,129
+/- 348
+/- 396
+/- 1,957
+/- 1,739
+/- 495
+/- 260
+/- 83
+/-123
+/-123
+/- 31
+/-123
+/- 51
+/- 842
+/- 284
+/- 319
+/- 422
+/- 220
+/- 284
+/- 267
+/- 455
50.9%
49.1%
3.6%
2.8%
2.0%
3.7%
8.3%
24.9%
17.9%
13.8%
6.4%
5.2%
5.3%
4.0%
2.0%
90.4%
86.5%
14.3%
11.3%
50.9%
49.1%
43.7%
56.3%
96.3%
81.2%
3.8%
0.8%
0.1%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
8.7%
1.1%
2.0%
1.5%
1.1%
1.1%
0.6%
1.2%
X
X X
100.0%
+/-1.3
+/- 0.9
+/- 0.5
+/- 0.3
+/- 0.3
+/- 0.7
+/- 1.1
+/- 1.2
+/- 1
+/- 0.8
+/- 0.6
+/- 0.5
+/- 0.5
+/- 0.4
+/- 0.3
+/- 0.7
+/- 1.4
+/- 0.8
+/- 0.3
+/- 0.7
+/- 0.6
+/- 2.8
+/- 2.8
+/- 0.4
+/- 0.7
+/- 0.6
+/- 0.3
+/-0.1
+/-0.6
+/-0.6
+/-0.1
+/-0.1
+/- 1
+/- 0.3
+/- 0.4
+/- 0.5
+/- 0.3
+/- 0.3
+/- 0.3
+/- 0.5
Total population: 83,463 +/- 2,002 X100.0%
Two or More Races 3,087 +/- 511 3.7% +/- 0.6
One Race: 80,376 +/- 1,957 96.3% +/- 0.4
SEX AND AGE
RACE
+/-0.6
High
Moderate
7 7/10/2014
Page 1 of 3DP05 Demographic and Housing Estimates, 2006-2010 American Community Survey
Geographic Area:
Council District # 7
Subject EstimateEstimate
Margin of Error¹ PercentPercent
Margin of Error¹ Reliability²
High
High
Moderate
Low
Low
NC
Low
Low
Moderate
High
Moderate
Moderate
Moderate
Low
High
High
Moderate
High
Moderate
Moderate
High
Moderate
Moderate
Low
Moderate
High
High
High
Moderate
High
Low
Moderate
High
Low
High
High
Other Asian 1,020
Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander:
97
Native Hawaiian 20
Guamanian or Chamorro 0
Samoan 31
Other Pacific Islander 46
Some Other Race 1,352
Two or More Races: 3,087
White and Black or African American 238
White and American Indian and Alaska Native
784
White and Asian 1,432
Black or African American and American Indian and Alaska Native
140
White 70,546
Black or African American 3,644
American Indian and Alaska Native 1,702
Asian 8,911
Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander 246
Some Other Race 1,588
Hispanic or Latino of any race: 3,955
Mexican 2,063
Puerto Rican 223
Cuban 196
Other Hispanic or Latino 1,473
Not Hispanic or Latino: 79,508
White alone 65,505
Black or African American alone 3,141
American Indian and Alaska Native alone
631
Asian alone 7,216
Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander alone
97
Some other race alone 117
Two or more races: 2,801
Two races including Some other race 80
Two races excluding Some other race and Three or more races
2,721
Total Housing Units: 54,745
+/- 455
+/- 80
+/- 33
+/-123
+/- 47
+/- 55
+/- 379
+/- 511
+/- 136
+/- 229
+/- 379
+/- 96
+/- 1,768
+/- 495
+/- 389
+/- 946
+/- 129
+/- 407
+/- 608
+/- 438
+/- 132
+/- 166
+/- 377
+/- 1,962
+/- 1,740
+/- 457
+/- 254
+/- 838
+/- 80
+/- 71
+/- 497
+/- 87
+/- 488
+/- 425
1.2%
0.1%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.1%
1.6%
3.7%
0.3%
0.9%
1.7%
0.2%
84.5%
4.4%
2.0%
10.7%
0.3%
1.9%
4.7%
2.5%
0.3%
0.2%
1.8%
95.3%
78.5%
3.8%
0.8%
8.6%
0.1%
0.1%
3.4%
0.1%
3.3%
100.0% X
+/- 0.5
+/-0.1
+/-0.1
+/-0.6
+/-0.1
+/-0.1
+/- 0.5
+/- 0.6
+/- 0.2
+/- 0.3
+/- 0.5
+/- 0.1
+/- 0.6
+/- 0.6
+/- 0.5
+/- 1.1
+/- 0.2
+/- 0.5
+/- 0.7
+/- 0.5
+/- 0.2
+/- 0.2
+/- 0.4
+/- 0.6
+/- 0.9
+/- 0.5
+/- 0.3
+/- 1
+/-0.1
+/-0.1
+/- 0.6
+/- 0.1
+/- 0.6
Total population: 83,463 +/- 2,002 X100.0%
Total population: 83,463 +/- 2,002 X100.0%
RACES ALONE OR IN COMBINATION WITH ONE OR MORE OTHER RACES
HOUSING
HISPANIC OR LATINO AND RACE
7 7/10/2014
Page 2 of 3DP05 Demographic and Housing Estimates, 2006-2010 American Community Survey
Geographic Area:
U.S. Census Bureau, 2006-2010 American Community Survey (ACS), 5-Year estimates
City of Seattle, Department of Planning and Development (DPD)On the Web at: http://www.seattle.gov/dpd/Research/Population_Demographics/Overview/
Supporting documentation on code lists, subject definitions, data accuracy, and statistical testing can be found on the American Community Survey website in the Data and Documentation section.
Sample size and data quality measures (including coverage rates, allocation rates, and response rates) can be found on the American Community Survey website in the Methodology section.
Although the American Community Survey (ACS) produces population, demographic and housing unit estimates, for 2010, the 2010 Census provides the official counts of the population and housing units for the nation, states, counties, cities and towns. For 2006 to 2009, the Population Estimates Program provides intercensal estimates of the population for the nation, states, and counties.
Data are based on a sample and are subject to sampling variability. The degree of uncertainty for an estimate arising from sampling variability is represented through the use of a margin of error. The value shown here is the 90 percent margin of error. The margin of error can be interpreted roughly as providing a 90 percent probability that the interval defined by the estimate minus the margin of error and the estimate plus the margin of error (the lower and upper confidence bounds) contains the true value. In addition to sampling variability, the ACS estimates are subject to nonsampling error (for a discussion of nonsampling variability, see Accuracy of the Data). The effect of nonsampling error is not represented in these tables.
While the 2006-2010 American Community Survey (ACS) data generally reflect the December 2009 Office of Management and Budget (OMB) definitions of metropolitan and micropolitan statistical areas; in certain instances the names, codes, and boundaries of the principal cities shown in ACS tables may differ from the OMB definitions due to differences in the effective dates of the geographic entities.
Estimates of urban and rural population, housing units, and characteristics reflect boundaries of urban areas defined based on Census 2000 data. Boundaries for urban areas have not been updated since Census 2000. As a result, data for urban and rural areas from the ACS do not necessarily reflect the results of ongoing urbanization.
Explanation of Symbols:1. An '**' entry in the margin of error column indicates that either no sample observations or too few sample observations were available to compute a standard error and thus the margin of error. A statistical test is not appropriate.2. An '-' entry in the estimate column indicates that either no sample observations or too few sample observations were available to compute an estimate, or a ratio of medians cannot be calculated because one or both of the median estimates falls in the lowest interval or upper interval of an open-ended distribution.3. An '-' following a median estimate means the median falls in the lowest interval of an open-ended distribution.4. An '+' following a median estimate means the median falls in the upper interval of an open-ended distribution.5. An '***' entry in the margin of error column indicates that the median falls in the lowest interval or upper interval of an open-ended distribution. A statistical test is not appropriate.6. An '*****' entry in the margin of error column indicates that the estimate is controlled. A statistical test for sampling variability is not appropriate.7. An 'N' entry in the estimate and margin of error columns indicates that data for this geographic area cannot be displayed because the number of sample cases is too small.8. An '(X)' means that the estimate is not applicable or not available."
This is one of four reports that have been adapted from the ACS "Data Profile" (DP) Series. The four DP tables published by the Census Bureau are: DP02 Selected Social Characteristics; DP03 Selected Economic Characteristics; DP04 Selected Housing Characteristics; DP05 Demographic and Housing Estimates.
DPD has adapted these DP tables for reporting ACS estimates for locally-defined geographies. The locally defined areas covered in these reports are made up of multiple census tracts (except for a few Community Reporting Areas that are made up of only one Census Tract each), therefore estimates shown for these geographies are based on aggregating estimates for multiple census tracts. For ease of calculation, medians are the average of the medians.
¹ The ACS is a sample survey and as such, estimates carry sampling error. Margins of error (MOEs) provide a measure of sampling error
The MOEs displayed for the aggregated estimates in these reports could only be approximated using the formulas provided by the Census Bureau. These formulas do not account for “covariance” (or inter-relationship) between the aggregated estimates, and can understate or—more commonly—overstate the margins of error. In some cases, actual MOEs may be much different than approximated. MOEs of +/- 0.1 and below are displayed as +/- 0.1 based on Census Bureau convention.
² The reliability indicator of High, Moderate, or Low is meant to provide a general sense of an estimate's reliability. Data users will need to use discretion in identifying the level of reliability appropriate for their purposes.
“High” reliability: MOE is less than or equal to 20% of the estimate. Indicates that sampling error is small relative to the size of the estimate. Flagged green."Moderate” reliability: MOE is between 20% and 66.7% of the estimate. Flagged yellow to indicate that the estimate should be used with caution."Low” reliability: MOE is over 66.7% of the estimate. Flagged red to warn that sampling error is large relative to the estimate and that the estimate is very unreliable."NC": Estimate is 0. Reliability cannot be calculated.
Percent Margin of Error "W" value indicates the standard formula for estimating the percent MOE could not be applied (due to negative value under square root).
For more about MOEs, see Census Bureau notes below. For formulas, see “American Community Survey Multiyear Accuracy of the Data (3-year 2008-2010 and 5-year 2006-2010),” http://www.census.gov/acs/www/Downloads/data_documentation/Accuracy/MultiyearACSAccuracyofData2010.pdf.)
Census Bureau notes for DP05:
"For more information on understanding race and Hispanic origin data, please see the Census 2010 Brief entitled, Overview of Race and Hispanic Origin: 2010, issued March 2011. (pdf format)
The ACS questions on Hispanic origin and race were revised in 2008 to make them consistent with the Census 2010 question wording. Any changes in estimates for 2008 and beyond may be due to demographic changes, as well as factors including questionnaire changes, differences in ACS population controls, and methodological differences in the population estimates, and therefore should be used with caution. For a summary of questionnaire changes see http://www.census.gov/acs/www/methodology/questionnaire_changes/. For more information about changes in the estimates see http://www.census.gov/population/www/socdemo/hispanic/reports.html.
Notes:
Source:
Produced by:
7 7/10/2014
Page 3 of 3DP05 Demographic and Housing Estimates, 2006-2010 American Community Survey
Geographic Area:
