Delta Gold Corporation

An Experienced Team An Experienced Team Building A New Gold CompanyBuilding A New Gold Company

February 2013February 2013

www.deltagold.com

Forward Looking StatementsForward Looking Statements

This presentation may contain “forward-looking information” within the meaning of Canadian securities acts or “forward-lookingstatements” within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 of the United States. Forward-lookingstatements are subject to a variety of risks and uncertainties which could cause actual events or results to differ from thosereflected in the forward-looking statements, including, without limitation, risks and uncertainties relating to the interpretation ofdrill results and the estimation of mineral resources, the geology, grade and continuity of mineral deposits, future materialproduction, the possibility that future exploration, development results will not be consistent with the Company’s expectations,accidents, equipment breakdowns, title matters and surface access, labour disputes, the potential for delays in explorationactivities, the potential for unexpected costs and expenses, commodity price fluctuations, currency fluctuations, failure to obtainadequate financing on a timely basis and other risks and uncertainties, including those described under Risk Factors in themanagement discussion and analysis. In addition, forward-looking information is based on various assumptions including,without limitation, the expectations and beliefs of management, the assumed long term price of gold, that the Company willreceive required permits and access to surface rights, that the Company can access financing, appropriate equipment andsufficient labour and that the political environment within California will continue to support the development of environmentallysafe mining projects. Should one or more of these risks and uncertainties materialize, or should underlying assumptions provei t t l lt t i ll f th d ib d i f d l ki t t t A di l dincorrect, actual results may vary materially from those described in forward-looking statements. Accordingly, readers areadvised not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements.

Forward-looking statements may prove inaccurate, as actual results and future events could materially differ from thoseanticipated in such statements. Delta Gold undertakes no obligation to update forward-looking statements if circumstances ormanagement estimates, assumptions or opinions change, except as required by applicable law.

This presentation may use the terms “indicated" and “inferred" as these terms are defined under Canada's National Instrument43-101. U.S. Investors are advised that, while such terms are recognized and required by Canadian regulations, they are notrecognized by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") and may not be comparable to similar informationfor United States mining or exploration companies. As such, certain information contained in this news release concerningdescriptions of mineralization and resources under Canadian standards is not comparable to similar information made public byUnited States companies subject to the reporting and disclosure requirements of the SEC. U.S. investors are cautioned not toassume that any part or all of the mineral deposits described in these categories will ever be converted into proven or probablereserves, as defined in the SEC's Industry Guide No. 7.

www.deltagold.com 1

Delta Delta Gold Gold -- Strategy and Strategy and ObjectivesObjectives

B ild ld i i b bli tf li f l t d hi hBuild a gold mining company by assembling a portfolio of low cost and high-quality, producing and development-stage gold assets in stable jurisdictions

Focus on economically, environmentally and socially viable projects ocus o eco o ca y, e o e a y a d soc a y ab e p ojec sleveraging the Delta Gold team’s experience and skill sets

Maintain very high safety, environmental and social standards

Generate superior returns for Delta Gold’s shareholders and meaningful benefits for the communities in which we operate

www.deltagold.com 2

Delta Delta Gold Gold –– Formula for SuccessFormula for Success

The Delta Gold Formula:Quality Resource

+ Good Jurisdiction

Technical Excellence

++

High Environmental Integrity

Cultural Respect

++

Good Communication

Community Economic Benefits and Business Opportunities

++ Community Economic Benefits and Business Opportunities++ Training, Hiring and Buying Locally

www.deltagold.com 3

ECONOMIC SUCCESS AND SUSTAINABILITY=

Delta Gold Delta Gold -- Corporate HighlightsCorporate Highlights

Flagship asset – Imperial Project, California

Feasibility and permitting stage gold deposit

Defined Resource(1):

Imperial

o 879,000 oz Indicated

o 1,298,000 oz Inferred

Dormant since 2002

Proven management team

On-budget and on-time project execution history

o Highly successful mine permitting track record

o Excellent CSR reputation

Management and Board of Directors with great breadth and depth of experience and a history of delivering shareholder value

Pipeline of additional growth opportunitiesPipeline of additional growth opportunities

www.deltagold.com 4

(1) Effective March 30, 2012 and calculated at a Cutoff Grade of 0.17 g/t within a constraining Whittle optimised shell at US$1,400/oz gold price as per technical report issued November 5, 2012 entitled “Preliminary Economic Assessment Technical Report for the Imperial Project, California, USA” prepared by SRK Consulting

Imperial Project Imperial Project –– HighlightsHighlights

Advanced stage gold development project

Location easily accessible by road - 30 minutes from city of Yuma Arizona and minutes from city of Yuma, Arizona, and international airport

Over 60,000 meters of drilling

Feasibility Study and draft EIS completed by Glamis Gold in 1996

Long mining history in the area, including New Gold’s operating Mesquite Mine

Contracted to purchase 100% of Imperial Project from Goldcorp

$30 million in Delta Gold equity + gold price participation above $1300/oz

Issued NI 43-101 compliant Technical Report and Preliminary Economic Assessment November 5, 2012

www.deltagold.com 5

Imperial Project Imperial Project –– SettingSetting

Gentle topography

Benign climate 365 d/y operations

No critical habitat for endangered fauna or flora species was identified in past environmental studies

Culturally sensitive area

Unemployment rates in both Yuma and Imperial counties ha e been consistentl among have been consistently among highest in the U.S. ~ 29.9% in August 2012 (1)

www.deltagold.com 6

East Pit area looking towards Indian Pass

(1) U.S. Bureau of Labor statistics

Imperial Project Imperial Project –– Infrastructure and TenureInfrastructure and Tenure

Excellent power, water and transportation infrastructure

656 claims covering 5,721 acres

Validated claims by BLM secure title to resource and give right to permit

Imperial Project: Drilled and tested large volume t ll

www.deltagold.com 7

water well

Imperial Project Imperial Project –– Technical CharacteristicsTechnical Characteristics

Geological setting similar to that found at nearby Mesquite and Picacho mines

Gold deposit is epithermal, disseminated, deeply oxidized

West Pit Singer Pits

Imperial Project Pit Shells (2)

deeply oxidized

Delineated Resource(1)

Indicated 879,000 ounces gold

Inferred 1,298,000 ounces gold

East Pit

Low strip ratio 2.68:1

Low cost mining due to weakly cemented gravel overburden

Excellent metallurgy 83% recovery projected

Low reagent consumption

www.deltagold.com 8

(1) Effective March 30, 2012 and calculated at a Cutoff Grade of 0.17 g/t within a constraining Whittle optimised shell at US$1,400/oz gold price as per technical report issued November 5, 2012 entitled “Preliminary Economic Assessment Technical Report for the Imperial Project, California, USA” prepared by SRK Consulting

(2) Pit shell 27 as per technical report entitled “Preliminary Economic Assessment Technical Report for the Imperial Project, California, USA” prepared by SRK Consulting. PEA Life of Mine Plan, 1.19 Million ozs recovered, 89 Million Tons ore at a 2.68 strip ratio (Includes 47% from Inferred Resources. Mineral resources that are not mineral reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability)

Imperial Project Imperial Project –– PEA SummaryPEA Summary

Incremental Opportunities: Decrease capital cost by leasing mining

fleet / contract mining

o Potential reduction ~ $65 million

PEA Highlights(1)

Mining Method Open Pit, Heap LeachProcessing Rate 25,000 tpdMine Production Life 10 yearso Potential reduction ~ $65 million

Improved pit development / backfilling sequence to reduce post-mining waste re-handling

Negotiate alternate reclamation and

yStrip Ratio (waste:ore) 2.68Metallurgical Recovery 83%Total Gold Recovered (2) 1.187 mozsAverage Annual Gold Production 119,000 ozs

backfilling plan

Optimise crushing/agglomerating, including evaluation of run-of-mine processing to reduce operating costs

Cash Costs (including royalty, refining) US$599/oz

Total life of mine cash costs US$ 965/ozInitial Capital Cost (3) US$202 millionLOM Sustaining Capital US$74 milliong p $Closure Capital US$149 million

Pre-Tax NPV (5%, US$1,300/oz Au) US$215 millionPre-Tax IRR 23%Post-Tax NPV (5%, US$1,300/oz Au) US$136 millionPost-Tax IRR 19%Capital Payback Period 3.5 years

www.deltagold.com 9

(1) Costs effective March 30, 2012 and calculated at a US$1,300/oz gold price as per technical report issued November 5, 2012 entitled “Preliminary Economic Assessment Technical Report for the Imperial Project, California,USA” prepared by SRK Consulting

(2) Inferred resources were used in the life-of-mine (“LOM”) plan with inferred resources representing 47% of the material planned for processing. Mineral resources that are not mineral reserves do not have demonstratedeconomic viability. There is no certainty that all or any part of the mineral resources will be converted into mineral reserves. Mineral reserves can only be estimated as a result of an economic evaluation as part of apreliminary feasibility study (“PFS”) or a feasibility study (“FS”) of a mineral project. Accordingly, at the present level of development, there are no mineral reserves at the Imperial Project.

(3) See details on slide 29 in Appendix

Imperial Project Imperial Project -- HighlightsHighlights

Defined resource

Technically de-risked

Low capital intensity

Low cash costs

Feasibility Study and Permitting Imperial Project: Proposed leach pads site and Cargo Muchacho Mountains

www.deltagold.com 10

Imperial Project Imperial Project –– Project HistoryProject History

Glamis Gold completed exploration, feasibility study, ordered mining equipment and issued draft EIS/EIR for public comment in 1996

Delta Gold team members have past history with Imperial exploration

Project faced opposition from NGOs and local Quechan Tribe. Focus on spiritual and cultural values of the area, as well as desert preservation agenda

In January 2001, a Negative Record of Decision was issued by the Bureau of Land M t iti l l i i th t P j t ld lt i “ d i i t” f Management, citing legal opinion that Project would result in “undue impairment” of spiritual and cultural values however the decision was rescinded in November 2001, based on a revised legal opinion, allowing EIS/EIR process to resume

In 2002, low gold prices (~US$300/oz) and new SMARA regulations requiring , g p ( $ / ) g q gbackfilling of open pit mines in California rendered the Project uneconomic

Goldcorp acquired Glamis in November 2006 and Project remained dormant

Delta Gold’s purchase agreement with Goldcorp completed in 2012 following a year-Delta Gold s purchase agreement with Goldcorp completed in 2012, following a year-long evaluation and due diligence process


Imperial Project Imperial Project –– Permitting Environment in CaliforniaPermitting Environment in California

California’s current mine permitting regulatory environment demands very high standards (e.g. backfilling open pits)

Delta Gold welcomes opportunity to meet these standards

Resulting mine will be first class operation

The BLM validation of the mineral claims in July 2002 gives Delta Gold the legal right to pursue permitting of the Imperial Project Imperial Project desert settingthe Imperial Project

Case Study: In 2012, Golden Queen Mining Co. Ltd. permitted the Soledad Mountainopen pit mine in California

A il 2007

Imperial Project desert setting

July 2012Kern County approved information

submitted in regards to Condition 107 of the Conditional Use Permits

(fully permitted)

July 2010Lohantan Regional Water Quality Control Board approved Waste

Discharge Requirements

April 2007Submitted application to Kern County for a revised Mining &

Reclamation Plan

April 2010Kern County Planning

Commission unanimously

July 2009Air Quality & Health Risk Assessment completed / submitted to the Kern

Feb 2012EKAPCD issued the

Authority to Construct Feb 2011


Commission unanimously approved the ProjectCounty Planning Department & the

Eastern Kern Air Pollution Control District (EKAPCD); approved April 2010

u o y o o upermits

Feb 201110 applications for

Authority to Construct permits submitted to

EKAPCD

Imperial Project Imperial Project –– Delta Gold’s ApproachDelta Gold’s Approach

The Delta Gold team has a unique reputation for respect for environmental and cultural values. It has a track record of building positive, lasting and pragmatic relationships with local communities. This approach is best known for:

A focus on sincere consultation and progressive partnerships with First Nations

Very high environmental standards – ethical and technical excellence

An award-winning approach (PDAC e3 Award, BC Mining & Sustainability Award and others)

Precedent-setting cultural recognition by First Nation communities

Delta Gold will strive for early, open, direct and transparent communication with local residents and communities – aiming to create understanding and confidence in Delta Gold and the Imperial Project, where local residents are given the chance to make a meaningful contribution to the Project evaluation and planning process

Delta Gold’s senior management team plans to demonstrate its commitment by establishing a personal, early and sustained presence in the local community, and to build direct relationships at all levels, one at a time

Delta Gold’s prime objective is for the Imperial Project to be a win-win scenario for all


Imperial Project Imperial Project –– Feasibility Study Plan and TimelineFeasibility Study Plan and Timeline

Goal: Completely update Feasibility Study and submit permit applications Strong focus on building relationship with local communitiesPhase 1 – Initiate regulatory process Obtain permit to execute 19,000 metre drill programp , p g Environmental Assessment work and updatePhase 2 – Feasibility Study Execute drill program, revise resource model Metallurgical testing Metallurgical testing Engineering studies, opex and capex estimates1-year program estimated at ~$4 million – Start Feasibility Study2-year program estimated at ~$10 million – Complete Feasibility Study


Environmental due diligence

Delta Gold Delta Gold –– Investment HighlightsInvestment Highlights

Feasibility Study stage Imperial Project

Technically de-risked asset in safe jurisdiction

Low start-up capital requirement and low cash costs

The right team to advance Imperial Project through permitting and into production

Strong opportunity pipeline


The Imperial Project, CaliforniaThe Imperial Project, California


New Gold’s Mesquite Mine New Gold’s Mesquite Mine –– Located 15 km awayLocated 15 km away

New Gold core asset

Produced 3.7 million ounces Au since 1986

+150,000 oz gold per annum

Geology and mine ali ation emineralization verysimilar to Imperial Project

2011 operating cash flo f om Mesq ite


New Gold’s Mesquite Mine easternmost pit, with Imperial Project and Picacho Peak in the distance

flow from Mesquite was $103 million

Imperial Project Imperial Project –– Goldcorp Acquisition TermsGoldcorp Acquisition Terms

Option to acquire 100% of the Imperial Gold Project from for $30 million payable in Delta Gold shares On signing: $5.0 million (paid June 2012)

On-going: $5.0 million per year over 4 years

Contingent payment: $5.0 million on positive construction decision

Additional contingent cash payments: Up to $15.0 million in price participation at gold price above $1,300/oz (1) $ ,

Work commitments: $2.0 million per year over 5 years

Goldcorp currently holds ~11.5% interest – Standstill and Voting Trust Agreement


(1) For 4 years of commercial production, cash payment to Goldcorp based on the following calculation: 50% x (actual gold price - US$1,300/oz) x total gold produced. Capped at cumulative $15 million.

Imperial Project Imperial Project –– Technical CharacteristicsTechnical Characteristics

GLOBAL MINERAL RESOURCE INVENTORYGLOBAL MINERAL RESOURCE INVENTORY (1)(1)

As of March 31, 2012

Classification ktonnes g/t oz

Indicated 45,763 0.60 879,000

349 RC drill holes (~59,454 metres) and 9 core holes (~1,494 metres) drilled to dateGeological setting and oxide gold mineralisation similar to that found at Indicated 45,763 0.60 879,000

Inferred 76,334 0.53 1,298,000

Calculated at a Cut-Off Grade of 0.17 g/t and within a Gemcom Whittle™ -Optimised Shell at US$1,400/oz gold price

nearby Mesquite and Picacho minesEpithermal, disseminated and deeply oxidized gold deposit hosted in biotite and sericite gneiss formations Extensive metallurgical test program – 1992 to 1996 Column test recovery: 78% to 94% over 80 days

Low reagent consumption (< 0 15 kg/t cyanide)Low reagent consumption (< 0.15 kg/t cyanide)

Column and bottle roll results compared favourably to Picacho and Mesquite reference column tests

Imperial recovery is better than Picacho and Imperial recovery is better than Picacho and equivalent to Mesquite oxide

SRK Engineering estimates 83% recovery with minus 2 inch crush and agglomeration


(1) As per technical report issued November 5, 2012 entitled “Preliminary Economic Assessment Technical Report for the Imperial Project, California, USA” prepared by SRK Consulting with an effective date of March 30, 2012

Imperial Project Imperial Project –– Mine Limits and Cost Reduction PotentialMine Limits and Cost Reduction Potential

West Pit

Mine to consist of two main open pits, West Pit and East Pit, separated by the smaller Singer Pits Potential for a single open pit at higher gold prices

Singer Pits

g p p g g p– facilitates backfill sequencing

Majority of waste is weakly cemented gravels yielding low overall mining cost of US$1.48/tonne

East PitOpportunities: Some resource expansion potential between West

Pit and East Pit and down dip of the Singer Pits

Studying various crushing options, including run-y g g p , gof-mine processing


Imperial Project Imperial Project –– Mining DetailsMining Details

Major Mining EquipmentYear 1 Maximum

Hydraulic Excavators RH200 – 34 cy

2 2

F t E d L d 1 1Front End Loaders Cat 994 – 26 cy

1 1

Haulage Trucks Cat 793 – 240 ton

8 10

Blasthole Drills12 ¼”

2 2

Ore mining sequenceW t Pit Y 1 t 5

12 ¼”

West Pit: Years -1 to 5

Singer Pits: Years 4 to 5

East Pit: Years 3 to 10

Backfilling West Pit begins in Year 5Backfilling West Pit begins in Year 5

Backfilling completed Year 16

Mining Cost - $1.34/ton material


Imperial Project Imperial Project –– Capital Cost DetailsCapital Cost Details

In US$ millions where applicable Pre-Production Life of MinePre-Strip $34.7 $34.7Mining (Incl. Spares) $77.1* $114.0*Crushing & ADR Plant $46.5 $46.5Heap Leach Pad $16.7 $44.1Infrastructure $13.1 $13.1EPCM, Owners, Other Sustaining $20.6 $21.5

Contingency $29.8 $38.8g ySub-Total $238.5 $312.7Less Pre-Production Sales ($36.6) ($36.6)Total Capital Costs $201.9 $276.1

As per technical report issued November 5, 2012 entitled “Preliminary Economic Assessment Technical Report for the Imperial Project, California, USA” prepared by SRK Consulting with an effective date of March 30, 2012* C t t i i t it t id d d thi i* Contract mining opportunity not considered under this scenario


Delta Gold Delta Gold –– Attractive Relative Valuation Attractive Relative Valuation

EV / Gold Resource

120

150

180

e (U

S$/

oz)

0

30

60

90

n x o d n 'l d d n a a r s a d d p d e n d d d rEV /

Gol

d Res

ourc

e

Price / Net Asset Value (1)(2)

Rub

icon

Tore

x

Rom

arco

Pilo

t G

old

Gol

den

Que

en

Lydi

an I

nt'

Sul

liden

Gol

d

Prem

ier

Gol

d

Bel

o Sun

Sab

ina

Espe

ranz

a

Rai

ny R

ive

Guy

ana

Gol

dfie

lds

Ata

cam

aPa

cific

Mid

way

Gol

d

Mid

as G

old

Gol

dgro

up

Del

ta G

old

Riv

erst

one

Car

path

ian

Gol

d

Ast

ur G

old

Vis

ta G

old

Vic

toria

Gol

d

Exet

e

0.40x

0.60x

0.80x

/ N

AV (

x)

0.00x

0.20x

ilot

Gol

d

Tore

x

Rom

arco

ny R

iver

mie

r G

old

dian

Int

'l

sper

anza

Rub

icon

den

Gol

d

way

Gol

d

n Q

ueen

das

Gol

d

Guy

ana

oldf

ield

s

stur

Gol

d

Sab

ina

Bel

o Sun

vers

tone

oria

Gol

d

rpat

hian

G

old

Ata

cam

a Pa

cific

sta

Gol

d

oldg

roup

elta

Gol

d

Exet

er

P /


P R

Rai

Prem Ly

d

Es

Sul

lid

Mid

w

Gol

den

Mid G G As B

Riv

Vic

to Ca A

Vi

Go

De

Note: As at February 15th, 2013. Assumes C$/US$ exchange rate of 1.0065(1) NAV based on analyst consensus estimates except Delta Gold which is based on 2012 PEA(2) Illustrative Delta Gold analysis assumes treatment of US$25 million instalment payments to Goldcorp as a liability; NAV based on 2012 PEA (5% discount rate, US$1,300/oz gold price)

Delta Gold Delta Gold –– Pro Forma Share CapitalisationPro Forma Share Capitalisation

Pro Forma Basic Shares Outstanding 191,171,258

Capital Structure

ITM Options & Warrants 7,698,592

Fully Diluted ITM Shares Outstanding 199,099,850

OTM Options & Warrants [48,161,866]

Fully Diluted Shares Outstanding [247,617,159]


Management & Board of Directors Management & Board of Directors

Marco A. Romero – President & Chief Executive Officer

Mr. Romero is an entrepreneur with over 30 years of diversified international experience in the mining and construction materials industries. He hasheld leadership roles in exploration, environmental permitting, mine development and operations, mergers and acquisitions, corporate finance andbusiness management. Mr. Romero was the founder of Polaris Minerals Corporation and served as its President and Chief Executive Officer from1999 to 2008. He remains one of its non-executive directors. Prior to that, Mr. Romero was Senior Vice President of Corporate Development ofIvanhoe Mines Ltd. from 1998 to 2000. From 1991 to 1998, Mr. Romero was a co-founder and Executive Director of Eldorado Gold Corporation.

John H. Purkis – Senior VP, Operations & Chief Operating Officer

Mr. Purkis has +40 years of experience in the mining industry covering all aspects of the business, from exploration to mining and mine closure. Hewas a co-founder and director of Polaris Minerals Corporation from 2000 to 2009. He is a director and officer of two private startup ventures: GalileoMinerals Ltd. and Mexico Pacific Gold Ltd. He is the former CEO of CanAfrican Metals and Mining Corp., President and CEO of MCK Mining Corp.,Vice-President, Mining and Development, of Atna Resources Ltd., Project Manager of the Pueblo Viejo Project for Genel Dominicana, Vice-President,Projects of Inmet Mining Corporation, Vice-President, Mining, of Minnova Inc., and Chief Engineer of Cyprus Anvil Mining Corp. He has also heldsenior roles at mines and projects including Quintette, Faro, Samatosum, Troilus, Cobre Panama and Antamina. Mr. Purkis holds a Bachelor ofsenior roles at mines and projects including Quintette, Faro, Samatosum, Troilus, Cobre Panama and Antamina. Mr. Purkis holds a Bachelor ofScience, Engineering, from the Royal School of Mines in England and a Masters of Business Administration from Queens University in Canada.

Harry P. Sutherland – VP, Finance & Chief Financial Officer

Mr. Sutherland has +40 years of experience in senior positions with financial responsibilities in the mining industry. Mr. Sutherland was VP Financeand CFO of Polaris Minerals Corporation from 2000 to 2006, Chief Financial Officer of Manhattan Minerals Corp. from 1996 to 1999, Chief FinancialOfficer of Eldorado Gold from 1995 to 1996, Manager of Finance of Hudson Bay Mining and Smelting Ltd. from 1993 to 1995, and Chief FinancialOfficer of Imperial Metals Corporation from 1984 to 1992. Mr. Sutherland held various finance and management positions with Gold Fields of SouthAfrica Ltd. from 1971 to 1982.

Alex Boronowski – Vice President, Evaluations

Mr. Boronowski is a geologist with +40 years of experience in surface and underground exploration, and mine development. His experience includesdomestic and international precious and base metal project evaluations and exploration for major companies, such as Cominco, Texasgulf, KiddCreek, TOTAL and Eldorado, and for various junior resource companies. Mr. Boronowski played a key role in the research, exploration and resourcedefinition of Polaris Minerals Corporation's Orca Quarry and its Eagle Rock Project.

Colin K. Benner – Chairman & Director

Mr. Benner is a professional mining engineer with over 40 years of experience in engineering and management in the Canadian and Internationalmining industry. Currently he serves as Executive Chairman of AuRico Gold Ltd., and Chairman of Corsa Coal Ltd. He is the past Executive Chairmanof PBS Coals Inc., CEO of Skye Resources Inc. and served as interim CEO of HudBay Minerals Inc. He has been directly involved in the successfulraising of capital for project development and in a number of commercial transactions in the mining industry including the taking public and sale ofPBS Coals, the acquisition of Rio Narcea Gold Mines, the merger of Lundin Mining Corp. and Tenke Mining Corp. and prior to this the merger ofLundin Mining Corp. and EuroZinc Mining Corp. Mr. Benner has held several senior positions in the base metal, uranium and potash business, as


g p g p p , p ,well as the precious metals sector. Some of these positions include Vice Chairman and CEO of Lundin Mining Corporation, Vice Chairman & CEO ofEuroZinc Mining Corporation, President & CEO of Breakwater Resources Ltd., President and CEO of Black Hawk Mining Ltd. and Executive VicePresident of Denison Mines Ltd. A qualified Independent Corporate Director. He is also a director of Adriana Resources, Adent Capital, MercatorMinerals, Dalradian Resources, Lundin Mining and Troon Ventures.

Management & Board of Directors (Continued)Management & Board of Directors (Continued)

John P.A. Budreski – Director

Mr. Budreski is an independent businessman who spent 25 years in the investment industry including investment banking, M&A, sales, trading andresearch. Until January 2012, he was Vice-chairman of Cormark Securities, Inc. Prior to that, Mr. Budreski was the President and CEO of OrionSecurities and held senior positions with RBC Dominion Securities and Scotia Capital in investment banking, equity capital markets and managingsales, trading and research teams. Mr. Budreski is also a director of Sandstorm Gold Ltd., Sandstorm Metals & Energy Ltd., Alaris RoyaltyCorporation and Erdene Resource Development Corporation. He holds a Bachelor of Engineering from the Technical University of Nova Scotia and anMBA f th U i it f C lMBA from the University of Calgary.

William Myckatyn – Director

Mr. Myckatyn has +35 years of technical and management experience in mine financing, development and operations. Mr. Myckatyn was co-founder, Chairman and subsequently Vice-Chairman of Quadra Mining FNX until its takeover in 2012. Prior to forming Quadra Mining in 2002, hewas Chairman, President and CEO of Dayton Mining Corporation where he led the restructuring of the company and its subsequent merger withPacific Rim Mining Corp. Prior to this, he served as President and CEO of Princeton Mining Corporation and Gibraltar Mines Limited., and worked forvarious operations controlled by Placer Dome Inc. and its associated and predecessor companies. Currently, Mr. Myckatyn is the Lead Director ofvarious operations controlled by Placer Dome Inc. and its associated and predecessor companies. Currently, Mr. Myckatyn is the Lead Director ofPacific Rim Mining Corp. and a director of First Point Minerals Corporation, San Marco Resources and Oceanagold Corporation.

Gary D. Nordin – Sr. Technical Advisor

Mr. Nordin is a geologist with +40 years of international experience in the mining industry. He was a co-founder and a director of Polaris MineralsCorporation from 2000 to 2009. Mr. Nordin is currently Vice President of Exploration of Orestone Mining Corp and a director of Canasil ResourcesInc. and Rae Wallace Mining. He is also the President of two private US exploration companies: Trend Resources LLC and Gale Peak ResourceGroup. Mr. Nordin is former co-founder, director, and Vice President Exploration of Eldorado Gold Corporation (1991-2001) and a former co-founder, director and Vice-President Exploration of Bema Gold Corporation (1982-1990).

Roman Shklanka – Director

Dr. Shklanka is a geologist with +45 years of international experience in the mining industry. He is currently the Chairman of Kobex Minerals Inc.and Pacific Imperial Mines Inc. He was Chairman of Polaris Minerals Corporation from 2000 to 2011 and Chairman of Canico Resource Corp., whichwas acquired by CVRD in 2005. He was also Chairman of Sutton Resources Ltd. from 1995 to 1999, when it was acquired by Barrick GoldCorporation. He was formerly Vice President of Exploration for Placer Dome. Dr. Shklanka was inducted into the Canadian Mining Hall of Fame in2009 in recognition of his numerous career accomplishments2009 in recognition of his numerous career accomplishments.


Contact InformationContact Information

650 West Georgia Street, Suite 480Vancouver, B.C. V6B 4N7

Marco Romero, President & CEOTelephone: (604) 681 – 2020 (101)

Fax: (604) 681 - [email protected]


Delta Gold Corporation

Business

Transcript of Delta Gold Corporation